Spinning Satellites Examples. ACS: Gravity Gradient. ACS: Single Spin

Similar documents
Attitude Determination and. Attitude Control

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

Lecture Module 5: Introduction to Attitude Stabilization and Control

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

Generation X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

Sensors: a) Gyroscope. Micro Electro-Mechanical (MEM) Gyroscopes: (MEM) Gyroscopes. Needs:

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

Attitude Control Strategy for HAUSAT-2 with Pitch Bias Momentum System

Attitude dynamics and control

Presentation by Indian Delegation. to 49 th STSC UNCOPUOS. February 2012 Vienna

Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem (ADCS) Review

Spacecraft Subsystems Part 1 Fundamentals of Attitude Control

A Miniaturized Satellite Attitude Determination and Control System with Autonomous Calibration Capabilities

MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009

GP-B Attitude and Translation Control. John Mester Stanford University

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Pointing Control for Low Altitude Triple Cubesat Space Darts

Sensors for mobile robots

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

Attitude control system for ROCSAT-3 microsatellite: a conceptual design

Design Architecture of Attitude Determination and Control System of ICUBE

Infrared Earth Horizon Sensors for CubeSat Attitude Determination

On-Orbit Performance of KOMPSAT-2 AOCS Korea Aerospace Research Institute Seung-Wu Rhee, Ph. D.

Attitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Attitude Determination and Control

An Attitude Control System and Commissioning Results of the SNAP-1 Nanosatellite

Quaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode

CS491/691: Introduction to Aerial Robotics

Lecture Module 2: Spherical Geometry, Various Axes Systems

Infrared Earth Horizon Sensors for CubeSat Attitude Determination

Attitude Determination and Control System Design for STU-2A Cubesat and In-Orbit Results

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

Inertial Frame frame-dragging

A Stellar Gyroscope for CubeSat Attitude Determination

Chapter 8 Part 1. Attitude Dynamics: Disturbance Torques AERO-423

FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute

Satellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon

Design of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft

Automatic Control Systems. -Lecture Note 15-

FIBER OPTIC GYRO-BASED ATTITUDE DETERMINATION FOR HIGH- PERFORMANCE TARGET TRACKING

A Multi-mode Attitude Determination and Control System for SUNSAT

D-SAT Simplified Magnetic Attitude Control

Attitude Determination using Infrared Earth Horizon Sensors

Orbital Environment Simulator

PRELIMINAJ3.:( 6/8/92 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION FOR THE DSPSE GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CSCI. Prepared by

Study Participants: T.E. Sarris, E.R. Talaat, A. Papayannis, P. Dietrich, M. Daly, X. Chu, J. Penson, A. Vouldis, V. Antakis, G.

GCOM-C/SGLI and its Lunar Calibration

An Inverse Dynamics Attitude Control System with Autonomous Calibration. Sanny Omar Dr. David Beale Dr. JM Wersinger

Attitude Determination System of Small Satellite

EE565:Mobile Robotics Lecture 6

Constant Orbital Momentum Equilibrium Trajectories of a Gyrostat-Satellite

Naoteru Gouda(NAOJ) Taihei Yano (NAOJ) Nano-JASMINE project team

Lunar Satellite Attitude Determination System

An Attitude Control System for a Low-Cost Earth Observation Satellite with Orbit Maintenance Capability

Attitude Determination using Infrared Earth Horizon Sensors

ONBOARD AUTONOMOUS CORRECTIONS FOR ACCURATE IRF POINTING

Design and Implementation of a Space Environment Simulation Toolbox for Small Satellites

Absolute Radiometric Calibration Using a Solar Reflector in Near-Geosynchronous Orbit

GOES-R Instrument Status and Accommodations. Barbara Pfarr GOES-R Program Systems Engineering January 2010 AMS Conference

APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING

Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics and Control. Christopher D. Hall

FAULT DETECTION for SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM. M. Amin Vahid D. Mechanical Engineering Department Concordia University December 19 th, 2010

Multi-aperture miniaturized star sensors, modular building blocks for small satellite AOCS systems

Orbit Determination of Satellite Formations. Terry Alfriend 9 th US Russian Space Surveillance Workshop

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

PRATHAM IIT BOMBAY STUDENT SATELLITE. Critical Design Report Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) for Pratham

Learning Lab Seeing the World through Satellites Eyes

VELOX-CI: Advanced Application of GPS for Radio Occultation and Satellite Attitude Determination

Dynamics and Control Functional Division Report

The Swarm Vector Field Magnetometer (VFM): instrument commissioning & performance assessment José M. G. Merayo

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

The Torque Rudder: A Novel Semi-Passive Actuator for Small Spacecraft Attitude Control

Tracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum. Wheels

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SPACE TETHER MISSIONS

Space Surveillance using Star Trackers. Part I: Simulations

Tides and Lagrange Points

AA 528 Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. Mehran Mesbahi Aeronautics & Astronautics Winter 2017 University of Washington

Hysteresis Nutation Damper for Spin Satellite

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Physics 106a, Caltech 4 December, Lecture 18: Examples on Rigid Body Dynamics. Rotating rectangle. Heavy symmetric top

THE DYNAMIC TEST EQUIPMENT FOR THE STAR TRACKERS PROCESSING

Structure and algorithms of motion control system's software of the small spacecraft

Fundamentals of attitude Estimation

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

INVESTIGATION OF PULSED PLASMA THRUSTERS FOR SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL

Exploring the Mysteries of the Cosmos on the MOST Microsatellite Mission

Jitter and Basic Requirements of the Reaction Wheel Assembly in the Attitude Control System

Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics for Undergraduates

LOCAL VERTICAL/LOCAL HORIZONTAL ATTITUDE CONTROL FOR SPARTAN SPACECRAFT. James R. Morrissey C. T. A. Incorporated Beltsville, Maryland, USA 20705

Tools of Astronomy Tools of Astronomy

OTSUKIMI Moon-sighting Satellite Kyushu Institute of Technology. 3 rd Mission Idea Contest UNISEC Global

T. Matsuo (NAOJ) ISS dimension ~ football stadium ISS mass ~ Jumbo jet ISS space = 1.5 x Jumbo jet. 90 min per orbit

Laser de-spin maneuver for an active debris removal mission - a realistic scenario for Envisat

Precision Attitude and Translation Control Design and Optimization

ENAE483: Principles of Space System Design Power Propulsion Thermal System

Ay 1 Lecture 2. Starting the Exploration

Transcription:

Attitude Determination and Attitude Control Placing the telescope in orbit is not the end of the story. It is necessary to point the telescope towards the selected targets, or to scan the selected sky area with the telescope. So the satellite attitude needs to be measured and controlled. Attitude Control Is the control of the angular position and rotation of the spacecraft, either relative to the object that it is orbiting (Earth, Moon..), or relative to the celestial sphere. The attitude control system (ACS) is composed of : Attitude Sensors, Controller, Actuators. Desired Attitude Estimated Attitude determines the desired torques, and send electrical commands Estimates the current attitude applies the desired torques take the measurements Actual Attitude Yaw = Imbardata Pitch = Beccheggio Roll = Rollio XY = piano dell orbita ACS: Gravity Gradient Description: Uses the change in gravity with altitude to create a torque when the principal axes are not aligned with the orbital reference frame. Long booms are usually extended to create the torque. The gravity gradient provides the restoring or stabilizing torque but does not damp the librational motion. Viscous dampers are added to dissipate the energy and damp out the librations. The gravity gradient torque can be a control torque but it can also be a disturbance torque if there are products of inertia. For example, LANDSAT had large products of inertia and the gravity gradient was the dominant disturbance torque. Advantages: Simple, reliable, cheap, long lifetime. Disadvantages: Poor pointing accuracy (5 deg), poor yaw control, thermal bending of boom causes oscillations, tendency to flip upside down. Description: The entire spacecraft spins, which provides inertial orientation. The spinning provides gyroscopic stiffness, and stability. The nutation damper damps out the nutation, but precession still exists. Spin is about the axis of maximum moment of inertia, that is usually, but not always, the orbit normal. Solar arrays are fixed to the body. Advantages: Simple, reliable, long lifetime. Disadvantages: Sensor collection is limited to scanning obtained by spin motion. High angular momentum results in poor maneuverability, i.e., reorientation of spin axis. Poor power efficiency, only half the solar cells are illuminated at any one time. Must spin about the axis of maximum moment of inertia. ACS: Single Spin Spinning Satellites Examples Spinning is used in satellites for astronomy when sky scanning is required. COBE, WMAP, Planck all spin at 1-10 rpm, so the telescopes (antennas) can scan the sky at a rate of deg/s. Complex scan patterns can be obtained by combining satellite spin and slow reorientation manouvers (see COBE, WMAP, Planck) 1

Flat spin: in the absence of perturbations the spin axis orientation remains constant with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars Not useful for astronomy. Using the ACS and perturbations, the spin axis orientation can be continuously reoriented away from the earth center. This is useful for full-sky surveys (COBE) Dual-Spin Satellite (2/6) A vehicle consisting of two primary components free to perform relative rotations about a common bearing axis is called a "dual- spin" vehicle, and the idea of stabilizing such a vehicle by spinning one part (the "rotor") while the other part (the "despun platform") rotates more slowly - or not at all - is called the dual-spin attitude stabilization concept. This dual-spin configuration thus serves to create a spin stabilized satellite. 3 A A C A C A 3 S Rotor Platform Description: ACS: Dual Spin The limitations of single spin satellites are partially overcome with dual spin satellites. With a dual spin satellite the payload, e.g. the antenna, is despun while the other portion of spacecraft spins to provide gyroscopic stability. Nutation is damped by nutation damper, located on either the spun or despun portion. Many of the geosynchronous communication satellites have been dual spin. Advantages: Despun payload allows Earth pointing payload. Can have spin about minimum moment of inertia axis. Reliable, long lifetime. Disadvantages: Poor power efficiency because solar cells are on spinning portion. High angular momentum results in poor maneuverability, i.e., reorientation of spin axis. Sensitive to mass imbalances. ACS: Momentum Bias Description: The momentum bias satellite is a variation of the dual spin concept that overcomes some of the problems of the dual spin. With the momentum bias spacecraft the gyroscopic stability is provided by a rapidly spinning momentum wheel rather than the bus. The payload and bus are despun or rotating at orbital rate. The momentum wheel provides control about the spin (pitch) axis and some combination of nutation damper, magnetic torquing, or propellant provide control about the yaw and roll axes. Use of propellant is avoided whenever possible. Magnetic or propellant are used for momentum damping. Advantages: Better pointing accuracy, better power efficiency due to despun solar arrays. Still relatively cheap and not complex which means less weight than three axis systems. When the pointing requirements are not stringent, i.e., > 0.5 deg, the momentum bias ACS is usually the desired approach. The momentum bias approach with magnetic torquers is the dominant type of ACS in LEO. Disadvantages: Usually poor yaw control. Gyroscopic stiffness results in poor maneuverability. Poorer reliability and lifetime. Due to its lower cost and complexity and relatively accurate pointing capability this has been the most popular type of ACS. 2

Typically a spacecraft will have several momentum wheels oriented along orthogonal axes. To change its rotation along those axes it will increase or decrease the spin of the momentum wheels in the opposite direction. When the spacecraft achieves its desired orientation, it can then halt its rotation by braking the momentum wheels by the same amount. Momentum wheels are usually spun by electric motors. Both spin-up and braking are controlled electronically by computer controls. The strength of the materials of a momentum wheel establishes a speed at which the wheel would come apart, and therefore how much angular momentum it can store. Since the momentum wheel is a small fraction of the spacecraft's total inertia, easily-measurable changes in its speed provide very precise changes in angle. Reaction (momentum) wheels Example: In the CNES ACS: Three magnetic-bearing reaction wheels apply a torque on the satellite to rotate it about one of its three axes. Two magnetic torquers interact with the Earth's magnetic field to generate torques and thus control the speed of rotation of the reaction wheels. Thrusters complete the system. Description: ACS: Three Axis ACS methods: All three axes are independently controlled by mass expulsion, reaction wheels (RWs) or control moment gyros (CMGs). Usually RWs or CMGs are used for control and propellant (sometimes magnetic torquing) is used for momentum dumping. Gravity gradient Passive Semi-passive Active Momentum bias with magnetics Propellant Advantages: Pointing accuracy, maneuverability and adaptability to changing mission requirements. Disadvantages: Spinner with nutation damper Dual spinner with nutation damper Reaction wheels with magnetics for momentum dumping CMGs with magnetics for momentum dumping Reaction wheels with propellant for momentum dumping CMGs with propellant for momentum dumping Cost, weight, complexity and lifetime. Attitude Control Methods and their Capabilities Actuators Actuators are usually broken into four classes: mass expulsion, momentum exchange, environmental and dissipative. An ACS may have actuators from any or all the classes. Mass Expulsion Momentum Exc. Environmental Dissipative Reaction wheel Gravity gradient Nutation damper Momentum wheel Magnetic GG viscous damper CMG Aerodynamic There are two types of magnetic torquers. Those used for momentum dumping or control in momentum bias systems, and the eddy current dampers used in gravity gradient systems. Range of torques available from some of these actuators (From Chobotov) Actuator Type Torque Range (N-m) From this table we see that RWs Reaction Control (RCS) 10-2 -10 and CMGs are used when precision pointing and/or high Magnetic Torquer 10-2 -10-1 torque is required. Satellites that Gravity Gradient 10-6 -10-3 perform rapid attitude maneuvers Aerodynamic 10-5 -10-3 or have articulating payloads Reaction Wheel 10-1 -1 which create large disturbance Control Moment Gyro 10-2 -10 3 torques require CMGs 3

Sensors The types of sensors used for attitude determination are: 1. horizon sensors (or conical Earth scanners), 2. sun sensors, 3. star sensors, 4. magnetometers, 5. inertial reference units (Inertia Measurement Unit or attitude reference units ARU), and 6. GPS receivers. Horizon sensors measure pitch and roll to an accuracy of about 0.1-0.5 deg. An accuracy less than 0.05 deg can be achieved by extensive calibration and accounting for the equatorial bulge. Sun and star sensors provide directions. An horizon sensor does not provide yaw information (for momentum bias systems it is not necessary to measure yaw). One wide- FOV or two narrow-fov star sensors are needed to provide attitude. Since the star sensors cannot provide continuous attitude measurements an IMU/ARU is needed to provide the attitude between measurements. IMUs suffer from drift and biases and need frequent updates which are provided by the star sensors. Magnetometers measure Earth's magnetic. Accuracies no better than 1 deg can be obtained. The GPS receivers are used in an interferometer mode to determine attitude. Accuracies as good as 0.01 deg are expected using GPS. Sun Sensors Most common because they are light weight, not expensive, limited power required and because they provide an accuracy which is acceptable for most of the missions. Sun is the principal source of energy (exemption: interplanetary spacecraft). Solar flux goes as 1/r 2. Sun (in the Inertial Reference Frame) is evaluated by using interpolating functions (armonic series expansion) which least square fit the Sun positions recorded in the star atlas. They are used to synchronize command with spin period, and they are used to protect star sensors. At 1AU the sun may be considered as a point (0.267 deg.). For GEO there is the parallax error (0.03 deg as max values). Presence Sun Sensors Presence Sun Sensors Based on the Snell refraction law. Sun rays Shadow rod Shadow area Entrance slit Photocell Presence sun sensors provide the sun crossing time only, or the sun presence within the sensor FOV ' nsin sin nsin 1 Image plane mask Aperture Lens Photocells Grid slit Used to synchronize pulsed command (spin-up, spin-down) to maneuvre, and to turn on/off onboard experiments and instrumentation. Photocell at the base (below the slit) Photo cell 2 Photocell 1 Sun image Mirror Analogic Sun Sensors Reference axis Normal Sun rays Normal Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Photocell T I( ) I(0) d n I(0)cos Normal Normal Mask Sun rays Photocells Photocell #2 Photocell #1 4

Sensor #1 Output current Sensor #2 Angle (deg) Measurement Command Digital Sun Sensors Command: sun presence Measurement (4 parts): 1) ATA, 2) Sign bit, 3) Code bits, 4) Interpolating bits. Command Measurement Digital Sun sensor Grid slits Photocells Binary and Gray code The gain of the Gray code consists of the fact that the bit string, which represents the angle measure, changes one bit only at each digital step. Decimal Binary Gray Decimal Binary Gray Sun angle 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 10 11 100 101 110 111 1000 1001 1010 0 1 11 10 110 111 101 100 1100 1101 1111 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111 10000 10001 10010 10011 10100 10101 1110 1010 1011 1001 1000 11000 11001 11011 11010 11110 11111 Binary code Gray code 5

Double Digital Sun Sensor Photocells Earth horizon sensor Best range: 14-16 of CO 2 (less high altitude clouds contr.) Earth horizon sensor Measure two crossing times t and t 1 2 With angular speed, the measured angle is ( t t ) Two measured angles, and 1 2 allow to evaluate the Nadir direction. 2 1 Relative radiance 400 (IR) and 30,000 (visible) Relative radiance Hot Moon Cold Moon Moon horizon sensor Hard horizon Moon temperature range: 240 deg to +30 deg Hot area for cold Moon Hot area for hot Moon Displacement angle (deg) Earth/Sun sensors for spinning S/C Meridian slit Inclined slit Satellite equator Moon center distance Cold horizon position Hot horizon position 6

Star sensor for spinning S/C The Archeops Star Sensor Archeops was a telescope on a spinning balloon payload, designed to map a significant fraction of the CMB sky with a microwave telescope. Optical axis Elevation slit Azimuth slit Da Nati et al. Mem. S.A.It. 2008 7

Star Sensor Da Nati et al. Mem. S.A.It. 2008 Optical Gyroscopes They are based on the Sagnac effect (see http://www-3.unipv.it/donati/papers/2c.pd, Shamir, Adi, An overview of Optical Gyroscopes Theory, Practical Aspects, Applications and Future Trends, May 16, 2006 Terry Pearson, How a gyroscope works, Febuary 1997, www.gyros.freeserve.co.uk) in which two light waves traveling in opposite direction in the same closed loop and generated by the same source, undergo a phase shift proportional to the rotating speed of the closed loop with respect to the inertial frame.both laser and fiber optic gyros replaced mechanical gyros 8

Jupiter scans Focal Plane Archeops Kiruna 2002 Star Trackers Electronics Photomultiplier Optical system Star Grid Baffle Da Nati et al. Mem. S.A.It. 2008 9

Da Nati et al. Mem.S.A.It. 2008 Magnetometers V They may be used at altitudes less than 1,000 Km, only. (Earth magnetic field decreases with radius as 1/r 3 ) Small precision is associated with the fact that the EMF Models are not so accurate. d Edl dt B Sensors Biases not negligeable (residuals of magnetic fields caused by onboard circuits) Electronic unit Da Nati et al. Mem. S.A.It. 2008 Signal processing and Analog to digital converter Telemetry Link Typical GN&C Sensors (Wertz) Attitude Determination Systems 10