#$% &'!&()&*&'(+(!"(",!%, (!(!!- &( '!&( '!&(& (! (!(!%-&!

Similar documents
COGNITIVE GROUP why talent is the key to successful business transformation

Introduction to Portal for ArcGIS. Hao LEE November 12, 2015

Introduction to Portal for ArcGIS

Portal for ArcGIS: An Introduction

Leveraging Web GIS: An Introduction to the ArcGIS portal

Portal for ArcGIS: An Introduction. Catherine Hynes and Derek Law

Workforce Development Enables Your Adoption Strategy

United States Forest Service Makes Use of Avenza PDF Maps App to Reduce Critical Time Delays and Increase Response Time During Natural Disasters

Introduction to ArcGIS Server - Creating and Using GIS Services. Mark Ho Instructor Washington, DC

ArcGIS. for Server. Understanding our World

ArcGIS Enterprise: What s New. Philip Heede Shannon Kalisky Melanie Summers Sam Williamson

The File Geodatabase API. Craig Gillgrass Lance Shipman

No. of Days. Building 3D cities Using Esri City Engine ,859. Creating & Analyzing Surfaces Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst 1 7 3,139

ANYTIME PDUs: COMBO PACK 4 (62 PDUs) No Longer Available PLAN SUMMARY TAKE COURSES ONLINE 24/7** Purchase Option

CHAPTER 22 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

FIS' Partnership with Zelle for P2P Payments

Web GIS Deployment for Administrators. Vanessa Ramirez Solution Engineer, Natural Resources, Esri

Incorporating ArcGIS Pro in your Curriculum

The purpose of this report is to recommend a Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy for the Town of Richmond Hill.

Web GIS & ArcGIS Pro. Zena Pelletier Nick Popovich

A Summary of State DOT GIS Activities. Presented at the 2004 AASHTO GIS-T Symposium Rapid City, SD

Web GIS Administration: Tips and Tricks

No. of Days. ArcGIS 3: Performing Analysis ,431. Building 3D cities Using Esri City Engine ,859

No. of Days. ArcGIS Pro for GIS Professionals ,431. Building 3D cities Using Esri City Engine ,859

T H R EAT S A R E H I D I N G I N E N C RY P T E D T R A F F I C O N YO U R N E T WO R K

JOB TITLE: CURRENT CLASSIFICATION/GRID POSITION # GIS Coordinator AD Grid Level 6(c) # 420

The File Geodatabase API. Dave Sousa, Lance Shipman

CORPORATE PROFILE MEVATRON SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED.

Test More, Test Faster, Test Continuously with HP Unified Functional Testing v January 29, 2015

December 2009 ArcGIS Server Functionality Matrix

Enterprise Integration of Autodesk MapGuide at the City of Vancouver

Putting the U.S. Geospatial Services Industry On the Map

ArcGIS Enterprise: Administration Workflows STUDENT EDITION

Math 301 Final Exam. Dr. Holmes. December 17, 2007

A People Strategy for Organizations

CHARTING SPATIAL BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION

ArcGIS Earth for Enterprises DARRON PUSTAM ARCGIS EARTH CHRIS ANDREWS 3D

Scaling Magento in the Cloud

Building an Enterprise GIS for Chicago s Water Reclamation District

Metering IT Assets: Chargeback/Showback 101

Oregon Department of Transportation. Geographic Information Systems Strategic Plan

THE WORLD S FASTEST MOST PRECISE FORECASTS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

Introduction to ArcGIS Server Development

JOB DESCRI PTI ON. GIS Administrator

ArcGIS Enterprise: What s New. Philip Heede Shannon Kalisky Melanie Summers Shreyas Shinde

GIS for Crime Analysis. Building Better Analysis Capabilities with the ArcGIS Platform

Geo-enabling a Transactional Real Estate Management System A case study from the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation

ASSESSMENT. Industry Solutions Harness the Power of GIS for Property Assessment

Rheological Testing Equipment for Polymers

Adoption of Engineering Practices for Maximization of Solvent Recovery

Introducing ArcGIS Engine

Web GIS Patterns and Practices

B E N E F I T S U R V E Y G O I N G D I G I T A L!

Geocoding of Statistics Portugal Business Register and it s integration with the INSPIRE s Annex III Buildings theme

What Would John Snow Do (Today)? Part 1

ArcGIS Deployment Pattern. Azlina Mahad

Better Topographic Map Production Using ArcGIS. A Comprehensive Solution for Mapping Organizations

An Enterprise Geodatabase: Montgomery County, Maryland ESRI 2004 User Conference Paper #1674

Using the File Geodatabase API. Lance Shipman David Sousa

GIS Geographical Information Systems. GIS Management

The Platform Generation. Derek Law and Ebony Wicks

Web GIS: Architectural Patterns and Practices. Shannon Kalisky Philip Heede

Design and implementation of a new meteorology geographic information system

2007 / 2008 GeoNOVA Secretariat Annual Report

The Underutilization of GIS & How to Cure It. Adam Carnow Esri

How To Juggle. Chemistry, Computers, and Business Interests: Perspectives on the Career Transition from Information Buyer to Information Supplier

Write a report (6-7 pages, double space) on some examples of Internet Applications. You can choose only ONE of the following application areas:

GIS Products & Solutions

Developing a Tactical-Level Geospatial Course for Army Engineers

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Academic and Student Affairs ******************************************************************************

Global 3D Machine Vision Market Report- Forecast till 2022

Salisbury University: Eric Flint, John O Brien, & Alex Nohe

Changes in Esri GIS, practical ways to be ready for the future

Global Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Market Professional Survey Report 2016

Developing GIS Software to Process Photogrammetric Point Cloud Data for Inventory Production

How does ArcGIS Server integrate into an Enterprise Environment? Willy Lynch Mining Industry Specialist ESRI, Denver, Colorado USA

The SAB Medium Term Sales Forecasting System : From Data to Planning Information. Kenneth Carden SAB : Beer Division Planning

2018 AWS Global Summit Sponsorship Overview

The Emerging Role of Enterprise GIS in State Forest Agencies

MEASURING THE COMPLEXITY AND IMPACT OF DESIGN CHANGES

Comprehensive Chemoinformatics since Web-based, client/server, and toolkit approaches. Native Oracle (cartridge) and Microsoft technology.

HOME NSGIS PORTS ENESGY DEMO CONTACT. Copyright NorthSouth GIS LLC, All rights reserved.

Reducing Complex Spatial Data Management Needs in and Upstream Oil and Gas Operations Team. Jason Wilson GIS Business Analyst SM Energy

WHITEPAPER. J u l y V2.01

The Journal of Database Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1999, pp Retail Trade Area Analysis: Concepts and New Approaches

Deploying Portal for ArcGIS STUDENT EDITION

INVESTOR UPDATE JUSTIN MILLER CEO & CO-FOUNDER O C T O B E R

Creating a Staff Development Plan with Esri

Road Ahead: Linear Referencing and UPDM

Overview of ArcGIS Enterprise August 24, Dan Haag ESRI

B E N E F I T S U R V E Y G O I N G D I G I T A L!

GIS Implementation part 2. Implementation challenges Key issues Effect Consequences

IBM System Storage N series function authorizations for IBM System Storage N3220 and N3240

Ørsted. Flexible reporting solutions to drive a clean energy agenda

ArcGIS GeoAnalytics Server: An Introduction. Sarah Ambrose and Ravi Narayanan

FLORIDA COLLEGE SYSTEM VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS AGGREGATED OUTCOME DATA

Boston, 16 August 2017 The UN Open GIS Initiative

Educational Qualification No ( No of Positions) 01. Geographic

B E N E F I T S U R V E Y G O I N G D I G I T A L!

Transcription:

!"!!"

#$% &'!&()&*&'(+(!"(",!%, (!(!!- &( '!&( '!&(& (! #$%(!& &("(&-" "(&& (!(!%-&! #$%( -""(&-( %%!&,. %'!&(-"&%%/0' #&.!"(%% "(&, #$%&*& *-( 12%"!1'3'14 15"!

#$%- -!6!&&,% ""(&,7 #1-"!"(8 #1-"!"(8 #1-"!"(8 #&( 9-'!&(* (!7 # 1(",/0' # 1!!&, # 1- #+( &!& 7 # 1:4$;/;3/ /$ %"" #1("" #'!&( &, (!% #%&,<&%&%!"(,%"&.&, '!&(*%(",/0'

70 Use of Eclipse-Based Products #$%(%(",!= "( <,&*&, #$%,- %6( '!&(%(",/0'&, *&-" &,<1!-"!!& Percent of Programmers 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Currently use IDE Occasionally use IDE Aware of Eclipse Which of the following best describes your knowledge / use of Eclipse or Eclipsebased products (such as IBM Rational Application Developer, MyEclipse, WindowBuilder, Compuware OptimalJ or others)? 2005 2006 Currently use as primary IDE 32.5 60.4 Currently use occasionally as an IDE 19.6 20.3 Aware of Eclipse or Eclipse-based products 47.9 19.3 Total 100 100

Title / Job Function 27%(%= " & %,&" &( ""& # 1%!"* &-% ""& # $%&-(""9-!"(&,%( >1? Percent of Programmers 40 30 20 10 0 Testing manager Product manager Development manager MIS manager Systems analyst Team leader Software architect CTO, CIO or Director Programmer VP Database Admin Other Which best describes your title or job function? 2005 Which best describes your title or job function? 2006 Programmer/software developer 42.6 Programmer / software engineer 29.2 Team leader/project manager 27.5 CTO, CIO or Director 18.0 Development manager or director 8.6 Software architect 13.3 Chief architect or CTO 8.1 Project lead / team leader 13.1 MIS manager or director 4.2 Systems analyst 6.8 Executive management 2.5 IT, MIS or Other Management 5.5 Testing Manager 1.2 Departmental Development manager 4.7 Line of business manager 0.7 Product manager 2.9 Other 4.6 Software Tester/Testing Manager 1.8 Total 100.0 Database Administrator 0.5 VP 0.5 Other 3.7 Total 100.0

!"# # $%& ( - ( >-? " " & %!( ( ((&! - %!"( #$% 6& ( " &(!""!& ((&! - & % /:-& *, % % ((&! - & "&.( (" Percent of Programmers Developer Segment 50 40 30 20 10 0 Corp enterprise Custom, SI, VAR OEM Commercial, ISV Corp apps for ind. Other Which of the following best describes the type of applications you work on MOST OFTEN? 2005 2006 Corporate-wide enterprise applications for use inside your company 41.4 43.7 Commercial applications for sale to people outside your company (ISV) 18.5 25.4 Applications for individuals, small workgroups, or department 14.6 11.3 Custom applications of any kind for clients outside your company (SI, VAR) 13.0 12.0 Applications or utilities to support specific devices your company makes or sells (OEM) 6.0 3.1 Open source software 2.3 * Other 4.2 4.5 Total 100.0 100.0

$#! %# & #$%!,- &((% &(->1? #$%(! %-!% 1-(.(% ""(&, Percent of Programmers 30 20 10 0 Number of Developers in Company Using Eclipse 11-25 6-10 1-5 101-500 51-100 26-50 501-1,000 Not currently using Don't know More than 1,000 If Eclipse IDE or Eclipse-based products are being used in your com pany, about how m any developers use them? 2005 2006 1-5 11.3 9.1 6-10 7.6 5.3 11-25 8.2 8.6 26-50 7.5 5.9 51-100 7.0 10.7 101-500 9.3 10.7 501-1,000 2.8 4.0 M ore than 1,000 4.0 24.9 Don't know 20.1 13.9 Not currently using Eclipse or Eclipse-based products 22.2 7 T otal 100 100 Eclipse Custom Survey 2006, 2006 Evans D ata Corp

!# ' "&# # 70 Operating System Used for Development (Host) #@ A4!*%(- % &("(,"> 1? #$%&@ -"&,",, *> 1? #56%" -&1(&%&,!&,>1? Percent of Programmers 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Windows XP Linux Windows 2003 Windows 2000 Solaris Mac OS Windows Vista Other Other UNIX IBM iseries OS IBM AIX HP-UNIX When using Eclipse or Eclipse-based products, which operating system do you run on the computer you use MOST to-program / Development? 2005 2006 Windows 2003 5.0 8.8 Windows XP 58.4 63.3 Windows 2000 20.7 7.4 Windows Vista * 4.7 Windows Other 0.5 * Linux * 8.8 Redhat Linux 4.2 * SuSe Linux 1.9 * Other Linux 1.1 * Solaris 2.1 1.6 IBM AIX 1.9 0.8 IBM iseries OS * 0.3 Other UNIX 0.8 0.3 HP-UNIX 0.5 0.8 Mac OS 1.6 2.2 Other 1.3 1.1 Total 100.0 100.0

!&# "&# # Operating System Used for Target Deployment (Target) #@ A4"%(", (," #$%,56"! (&!% 1(-"1&, -!'!&(< (-!-;(! (&-" (! Percent of Programmers 30 20 10 0 Linux Windows XP Windows 2003 Windows Vista Solaris Windows 2000 IBM AIX HP-UNIX IBM iseries OS Other UNIX Mac OS Other When using Eclipse or Eclipse-based products, which operating system do you run on the computer you use MOST to - Deploy / Target Applications for 2005 2006 Windows XP 25.5 24.4 Windows 2000 15.4 5.4 Windows 2003 11.0 * Windows 2003 1.9 16.4 Windows Vista * 11.3 Solaris 11.8 6.5 IBM AIX 6.3 5.4 IBM iseries OS * 2.0 HP-UNIX 2.5 2.8 Other UNIX 1.4 1.1 Linux * 19.8 Redhat Linux 8.8 * Other Linux 3.0 * SuSe Linux 2.7 * Mac OS * 1.1 Other 9.6 3.7 Total 100.0 100.0

Type of Software Eclipse Is Used To Develop - Trend Eclipse: Plug-in Adoption and Use #&"9 &(!!((&! 1!&, #$%,%"*- -,(-((&! % &,% #&%%&!%! &("-+4"*," (&-'!&(% %& W h a t ty p e o f s o f t w a r e a r e y o u r E c l i p s e - b a s e d p r o d u c t s b e in g u s e d t o d e v e l o p? P e r c e n t o f C a s e s 2 0 0 5 P e r c e n t o f C a s e s 2 0 0 6 S e r v e r - c e n t r i c a p p l i c a t i o n s ( J 2 E E a p p l i c a t i o n s, d a t a b a s e a p p s, E R P, C R M, e t c.) 5 4.9 6 5.1 D e s k t o p c l ie n t a p p l i c a t i o n s 2 6.6 4 4.1 T h i n - c l i e n t a p p l i c a t i o n s 2 4.5 3 3.5 P l u g - i n s f o r E c l i p s e 9.1 2 3.2 E m b e d d e d s o f t w a r e 9.1 2 2.7 R i c h c l i e n t a p p lic a t i o n s u s i n g E c lip s e R C P 9.3 2 2.7 M o b i l e c l i e n t a p p l i c a tio n s * 1 6.8 O t h e r 4.7 5.4 N o t c u r r e n tly u s i n g E c l i p s e / E c l i p s e - b a s e d p r o d u c ts 3 1.5 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - T o t a l R e s p o n s e s 1 6 9.9 2 4 2.2 E c l i p s e C u s t o m S u r v e y 2 0 0 6, 2 0 0 6 E v a n s D a t a C o r p

( )% # * + #$%=%, #96(!%%,&*%+4%6"% -% &,%&-6(!! How do you expect your use of the Eclipse Rich Client Platform to change over the next 6-24 months? 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months 24 Months Increase 44.2 44.5 37.8 37.5 Stay the same 23.6 26.0 22.2 19.5 Decrease 2.3 1.4 3.3 2.1 Will not use 13.1 8.7 8.7 7.2 Don't know 16.8 19.4 27.9 33.6

%, * + #$%= %, #; &(. (&. (B!% 6"% # 1(& +4 W h a t E c l i p s e p r o j e c t s d o y o u u s e o r p l a n t o u s e i n t h e n e x t 1 2 m o n t h s? C o u n t P e r c e n t o f R e s p o n s e s P e r c e n t o f C a s e s J a v a D e v e l o p m e n t T o o l s ( J D T ) 1 9 2 1 0. 8 5 7. 5 C / C + + I D E ( C D T ) 1 5 8 8. 9 4 7. 3 E c l i p s e M o d e l i n g F r a m e w o r k ( E M F ) 1 2 2 6. 9 3 6. 5 E c l i p s e R i c h C l i e n t P l a t f o r m ( R C P ) 9 9 5. 6 2 9. 6 W e b T o o l s P r o j e c t ( W T P ) 9 7 5. 5 2 9 D a t a T o o l s P l a t f o r m ( D T P ) 8 1 4. 6 2 4. 3 U M L 2 7 9 4. 4 2 3. 7 B u s i n e s s I n t e l l i g e n c e a n d R e p o r t i n g T o o l s ( B I R T ) 7 4 4. 2 2 2. 2 G r a p h i c a l E d i t o r F r a m e w o r k ( G E F ) 7 2 4 2 1. 6 E c l i p s e P r o c e s s F r a m e w o r k ( E P F ) 7 1 4 2 1. 3 V i s u a l E d i t o r ( V E ) 6 8 3. 8 2 0. 4 E c l i p s e C o m m u n i c a t i o n F r a m e w o r k ( E C F ) 6 7 3. 8 2 0. 1 T e s t & P e r f o r m a n c e T o o l s P l a t f o r m ( T P T P ) 6 7 3. 8 2 0. 1 G r a p h i c a l M o d e l i n g F r a m e w o r k ( G M F ) 6 4 3. 6 1 9. 2 A s p e c t J D e v e l o p m e n t T o o l s ( A J D T ) 6 3 3. 5 1 8. 9 M o b i l e T o o l s f o r J a v a 5 9 3. 3 1 7. 7 P H P I D E P r o j e c t 4 9 2. 8 1 4. 7 S O A T o o l s P l a t f o r m 4 9 2. 8 1 4. 7 D e v i c e S o f t w a r e D e v e l o p m e n t P l a t f o r m ( D S D P ) 4 1 2. 3 1 2. 3 E m b e d d e d R C P 3 5 2 1 0. 5 D a l i E J B O R M a p p i n g P r o j e c t 3 4 1. 9 1 0. 2 C o r o n a 2 7 1. 5 8. 1 E q u i n o x 2 3 1. 3 6. 9 H i g g i n s T r u s t F r a m e w o r k 2 2 1. 2 6. 6 P a r a l l e l T o o l s P l a t f o r m 1 8 1 5. 4 A L F 1 6 0. 9 4. 8 M y l a r 1 6 0. 9 4. 8 V o i c e T o o l P r o j e c t 1 5 0. 8 4. 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T o t a l R e s p o n s e s 1 7 7 8 1 0 0 5 3 2. 3 5 0 m i s s i n g c a s e s ; 3 3 4 v a l i d c a s e s E c l i p s e C u s t o m S u r v e y 2 0 0 6, 2 0 0 6 E v a n s D a t a C o r p

Please rank the following considerations with regard to barriers to Eclipse (Open Source) adoption within your organization. 1 (Most important) 2 3 4 5 (Least important) Relative Ranking Lack of training for Eclipse 16.4 29.5 22.6 12.5 19.0 311.8 Concerns about using Open Source software 34.3 11.4 15.2 9.4 29.6 311.4 Lack of expertise in using Eclipse 22.2 18.9 21.1 17.0 20.7 304.8 Concerns about Open Source licenses 25.7 20.3 14.5 10.5 29.0 303.3 Lack of support for Eclipse 10.9 20.8 26.3 22.5 19.5 281.2 Lack of support for Eclipse plug-ins 11.7 15.8 20.0 27.5 24.9 261.9 Lack of training for Eclipse plug-ins 8.3 18.1 25.0 22.9 25.7 260.4 Technical limitations of Eclipse 9.5 17.8 21.9 19.4 31.4 254.5 Lack of certification for Eclipse plug-ins 6.8 15.2 22.8 21.1 34.2 239.2 New releases of Eclipse platform too frequently 6.6 13.6 25.6 20.9 33.3 239.2 Other 28.4 12.3 6.2 4.9 48.1 267.9

#!;(! &!.-%"!""&,! -'!&( P lease rank the follow ing considerations with regard to barriers to E clipse (O pen Source) adoption within your organization. R elative R anking 2005 R elative R anking 2006 Lack of training for E clipse 315.4 311.8 C oncerns about using O pen Source softw are 291.5 311.4 Lack of expertise in using E clipse 327.8 304.8 C oncerns about O pen Source licenses 298.6 303.3 Lack of support for E clipse 310.4 281.2 Lack of support for E clipse plug-ins 300.2 261.9 Lack of training for E clipse plug-ins 295.5 260.4 T echnical lim itations of E clipse 296.4 254.5 Lack of certification for E clipse plug-ins 270.3 239.2 N ew releases of E clipse platform too frequently * 239.2 O ther 227.6 267.9 E clipse C ustom Survey 2005, 2005 E vans D ata C orp

+!%- '0(( ".!%-% &("!"", ;&(% (-%!"",- &(%!"(%!!& (" %,"% &(@ %&(!&*!!-&(*& ".%%!%!!!!!&(!".'0-% (",!!& 3&&,", $ &,! $%-"( %"&(-%-"' 0(%&*&%%,!!%!"!%!(*&"-"(&!!%%-% (!&'0( @*!" 4*&!%,-%&,*!* -%!"(,%%&!&!&*&&! %%-"%%!"(,

%#)"& &!% +./001 "-"!!7 C% B D!"!"