Unitary representations of the icosahedral graded Hecke algebra

Similar documents
On the unitary dual of classical and exceptional real split groups. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine MIT, March, 2010

Subquotients of Minimal Principal Series

Hermitian and Unitary Representations for Affine Hecke Algebras

Unitarity of non-spherical principal series

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework

Outline. Some Reflection Group Numerology. Root Systems and Reflection Groups. Example: Symmetries of a triangle. Paul Renteln

WHITTAKER UNITARY DUAL OF AFFINE GRADED HECKE ALGEBRAS OF TYPE E

Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory

On the centralizer of a regular, semi-simple, stable conjugacy class. Benedict H. Gross

ON THE STANDARD MODULES CONJECTURE. V. Heiermann and G. Muić

The Waring rank of the Vandermonde determinant

Notes on D 4 May 7, 2009

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

Critical level representations of affine Kac Moody algebras

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

KIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

Rational Catalan Combinatorics: Intro

Whittaker unitary dual of affine graded Hecke algebras of type E

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

RSI 2009 ABSTRACTS Anirudha Balasubramanian

Lie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Arithmetic harmonic analysis on character and quiver varieties

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

5 Quiver Representations

What is the Langlands program all about?

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Notes on Lie Algebras

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 26 Feb 2009

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Workshop on B-stable ideals and nilpotent orbits

Intertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups

QUIVERS AND LATTICES.

LECTURE 20: KAC-MOODY ALGEBRA ACTIONS ON CATEGORIES, II

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

UNITARY FUNCTORIAL CORRESPONDENCES FOR p ADIC GROUPS

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

On some combinatorial aspects of Representation Theory

Classification of Numerical Semigroups

Some notes on Coxeter groups

Ad-nilpotent ideals of Borel subalgebras: combinatorics and representation theory

Marko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Residual modular Galois representations: images and applications

The Spinor Representation

Representations Are Everywhere

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Representation Theory

Counting chains in noncrossing partition lattices

NOTES ON POINCARÉ SERIES OF FINITE AND AFFINE COXETER GROUPS

Du Val Singularities

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Reflection groups. Arun Ram Department of Mathematics University of Wisconsin Madison, WI s f(α),λ = fs α,λ f 1.

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Induced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

Talk at Workshop Quantum Spacetime 16 Zakopane, Poland,

The classification of root systems

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

Longest element of a finite Coxeter group

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Unitarizable Minimal Principal Series of Reductive Groups

On some conjectures on VOAs

SHELLABILITY AND HIGHER COHEN-MACAULAY CONNECTIVITY OF GENERALIZED CLUSTER COMPLEXES

Contents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2

An LMI description for the cone of Lorentz-positive maps II

DIRAC COHOMOLOGY FOR GRADED AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS

Geometric rationality of Satake compactifications

A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

is an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent

A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS

Root systems. S. Viswanath

Unipotent Representations and the Dual Pairs Correspondence

L 2 -cohomology of hyperplane complements

Colette Mœglin and Marko Tadić

Hodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces

Outline. The Distance Spectra of Cayley Graphs of Coxeter Groups. Finite Reflection Group. Root Systems. Reflection/Coxeter Groups.

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

The geometry of secants in embedded polar spaces

Math 210C. The representation ring

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 6 Dec 2018

The Image of Weyl Group Translations in Hecke Algebras

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

Computing the Unitary Dual. Jeffrey Adams, David Vogan, Peter Trapa and Marc van Leeuwen

Representation theory & the Hubbard model

The rational cohomology of real quasi-toric manifolds

On the Grothendieck Ring of a Hopf Algebra

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Why do we do representation theory?

ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8. Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia

Transcription:

Unitary representations of the icosahedral graded Hecke algebra AMS Southeastern Section Meeting, LA - March 9, 008 Cathy Kriloff Idaho State University krilcath@isu.edu Joint work in progress with Yu Chen Idaho State University Partial support provided by a grant from the ISU WeLEAD Project which is funded by NSF ADVANCE grant SBE-00073 Slides will be available at www.isu.edu/ krilcath/pubs. 1

(1) Icosahedral group and graded Hecke algebra () Tempered and unitary representations (3) Intertwining operators and other ingredients () Statement of results for H(H 3 )

Icosahedral reflection group H 3 = 10 symmetries of the icosahedron or dodecahedron = Coxeter group s 1, s, s 3 with relations given by h R = reflection representation of W containing root system R Positive roots α 1,... α 1, and actions of s i are given below. Figure 1. Positive roots of H 3, actions of s i, and the root order α 1 α s α 3 s 3 s 1 s α α s α 3 s3 s s 1 s 1 α 7 s1 α 8 α 9 s 3 s α 10 α 11 s s 1 s 3 α 1 α 13 s 1 s 3 α 1 s α1 where for τ = 1+, α = α 1 + τα α = τα 1 + α α = α + τα 3 α 7 = τα 1 + τα α 8 = α 1 + τα + τα 3 α 9 = τα 1 + α + α 3 α 10 = τα 1 + τα + τα 3 α 11 = τα 1 + (τ + 1)α + α 3 α 1 = τα 1 + (τ + 1)α + τα 3 α 13 = (τ + 1)α 1 + (τ + 1)α + α 3 α 1 = (τ + 1)α 1 + (τ + 1)α + τα 3 α 1 = (τ + 1)α 1 + τα + τα 3

Why noncrystallographic root systems? Crystallographic graded Hecke algebras have been well-studied by geometric, algebraic, and combinatorial means. Noncrystallographic algebras have no known geometry, but the representation theory is similar in many ways and intriguingly different in others. Understanding the representation theory of noncrystallographic graded Hecke algebras may help reveal some as yet unknown geometry. Efforts to generalize aspects of Lie theory to the setting of complex reflection groups must include the noncrystallographic cases. Since these are still real reflection groups they may serve as good boundary or test cases. Since they differ in fundamental ways they may help show what differences need to be accounted for. On a combinatorial level, these or similar algebras may help to relate objects that exhibit common numerology (e.g., noncrossing partitions, nonnesting partitions, vertices in generalized associahedra) but whose connections are not entirely understood.

Associated geometric and combinatorial objects Reflecting hyperplanes H 0 α i = {x h R x, α i = 0} for 1 i 1 Affine hyperplanes H 1 α i = {x h R x, α i = 1} for 1 i 1 C = closure of fundamental chamber is divided into 3-, -, 1-, and 0-dimensional cells by {H 1 α i } 1 i=1 3 1 0 0 0 y x 8 8 Characterize the 0-dimensional cells (vertices) using Z(x) = {α i x, α i P (x) = {α i x, α i = 0} = reflecting hyperplanes containing x = 1} = affine hyperplanes containing x. Theorem(Chen-K, 007). Ideals in the poset of positive roots under the root order characterize the 3-dimensional cells. (See final page.)

(Icosahedral) graded Hecke algebra H Additional ingredients: W acts on complexification h C = C R h R. W acts on symmetric algebra S(h C ) = polynomials on h C. { } CW = a w t w a w C with multiplication as in W. w W Graded Hecke algebra is H = CW S(h C ) with multiplication as in S(h C ) and in CW and xt si = t si s i (x) + x, αi = t si s i (x) + x s i(x) α i for x h C. Center is Z(H) = S(h C )W = W -invariant polynomials on h C. Z(H) acts on simple H-module V by central character γ h C (W γ). We will often restrict to real central character γ h R. Goal: Describe the real support of spherical unitary representations of H(H 3 ) ( SPUD ).

Tempered representations of H Any simple H-module V has generalized weight space decomposition V = γ h C V gen γ, where γ called a weight of V if V gen γ 0. H-module V is tempered (discrete series) if for all weights λ h C of V and all fundamental weights ω i h C, ω i(λ) 0 (ω i (λ) < 0). Unitary representations of H -operation defined on H by t w = t w 1, for w W and x h. x = t w0 (w 0 x)t w0 = x + α R + x(α )t sα, H-module V is Hermitian if there is nondegenerate form such that hv 1, v = v 1, h v, for all h H, v 1, v V, and V is unitary if, is also positive definite. An invariant Hermitian form on V is equivalent to an H-module isomorphism from V to its Hermitian dual.

Langlands classification for H Fix subset Π M of simple roots and root system R M they generate. H has subalgebra H M = H M0 S(t ) (h C, R M) where H M0 (C Π M, R M ), and define t = {ν h C α(ν) = 0 for all α Π M } t = {λ h C λ(α ) = 0 for all α Π M } t + = {ν t Re(α(ν)) > 0 for all α Π \ Π M }. For an H M -module U let I(M, U) = H HM U. Theorem(Langlands Classification - Evens, 199). (1) Every simple H-module is a quotient of a standard module X(M, σ, ν) = I(M, σ C ν ), σ a tempered H M0 -module, ν t +. () X(M, σ, ν) has unique irreducible (Langlands) quotient L(M, σ, ν). (3) L(M, σ, ν) is unique up to conjugacy of the triple (M, σ, ν). The W -module structure of X(M, σ, ν) is constant on cells.

Intertwining operator Restrict to spherical representations V such that Hom W (V, 1) 0. Writing w 0 = s i1 s il = (s 1 s s 1 s s 3 ) 3 induces the ordering β 1 = s l s α 1,..., β l 1 = s l α l 1, β l = α l. {α 1, α, α 7, α, α 13, α, α 11, α 1, α 1, α 1, α 9, α 10, α 8, α, α 3 }. For each ν V, define the following element of R[W ]: A(ν) = (1 + ν, β 1 s i1 ) (1 + ν, β s i ) (1 + ν, β l s il ) = (1 + ν, α 1 s 1 ) (1 + ν, α s ) (1 + ν, α 3 s 3 ). A(ν) is independent of the choice of reduced expression for w 0. A(ν) is invertible if and only if ν, αi = ±1 for all i. Define the principal series module X(ν) = H S(h C ) C ν for ν h R. If ν C then X(ν) has a unique simple quotient L(ν), which is spherical, and any spherical H-module appears in this way. L(ν) is Hermitian if and only if w 0 ν = ν. A(ν) is an intertwining operator from X(ν) to X( ν) with image L(ν) if w 0 ν = ν. L(ν) is unitary if and only if ρ(a(ν)) is positive semi-definite for all ρ Ŵ. The signature of ρ(a(ν)) is constant on cells.

Results for H(H 3 ) The spherical unitary dual of H(H 3 ) consists of three connected closed 3-dimensional pieces connected to three 1-dimensional pieces, a single isolated 1-dimensional piece, and two isolated points.!"α, $% &'( )'*&!" α+!"α # $%&'( )'*&!" α+ γ γ γ!"α, $% &'( )'*&!" α # γ γ γ γ γ γ γ

Techniques (1) Obtain vertices ν of 3-d polyhedral regions (a) Convert half-space description from exact inequalities over Q[ ] to approximate inequalities. (b) Use Polymake to convert approximate half-space description to vertex description. (Is there an algorithm over Q[ ]?) (c) Compute inner products in Maple to guess P (ν), Z(ν) for each vertex ν. (d) Solve systems of equations exactly in Maple to obtain an exact form for each vertex over Q[ ]. () Analyze signs of eigenvalues for each ρ(a(ν)) where ρ is an irreducible representation of H 3 (from W -graphs), ν is a vertex or average of vertices (chosen efficiently) (a) Compute matrix ρ(a(ν)) and characteristic polynomial χ ρ,ν over Q[ ]. (b) Analyze signs of coefficients in χ ρ,ν by inspection if possible and by computing an approximation if not. (c) Use Descartes Rule of Signs to detect or rule out negative eigenvalues.

Figure. Ideals in the positive root poset or 3-dim cells for H 3 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 3 1 3 7 7 3 9 8 7 9 8 8 7 8 7 9 9 8 9 7 11 13 8 11 10 8 13 10 11 10 1 13 1 13 1 1