Proton Structure from HERA and the impact for the LHC

Similar documents
Results on the proton structure from HERA

Inclusive Cross Sections at HERA and Determinations of F L

A M Cooper-Sarkar on behalf of ZEUS and H1 collaborations

F 2. cc _ Q 2 =2GeV 2. Q 2 =4GeV 2 Q 2 =6.5G Q 2 =35 G. Q 2 =12 GeV 2. Q 2 =20 GeV 2. Q 2 =120GeV 2. Q 2 =60 GeV 2 Q 2 =200G. HERA (pre.

Novel Measurements of Proton Structure at HERA

QCD Measurements at HERA

PoS(Photon 2013)004. Proton structure and PDFs at HERA. Vladimir Chekelian MPI for Physics, Munich

Results on the proton structure from HERA

ZEUS physics results for summer 2013

HERAFitter - an open source QCD Fit platform

Overview of PDF-sensitive measurements from Run I in ATLAS

Structure Functions and Parton Distribution Functions at the HERA ep Collider

Achim Geiser, DESY Hamburg. Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering Jets and Heavy Flavours in DIS Exclusive dipion electroproduction

The HERAPDF1.0 PDF set, which was an NLO QCD analysis based on H1 and ZEUS combined

Jets and Diffraction Results from HERA

HERAPDF fits of the proton parton distribution functions (PDFs)

Tests of QCD Using Jets at CMS. Salim CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration IPM /10/2017

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)455. HERAFitter - an open source QCD fit framework. Andrey Sapronov. on behalf of theherafitter team

QCD Results from HERA

from Klaus Rabbertz, KIT Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz Status of αs Determinations Mainz, Germany,

Proton Structure Function Measurements from HERA

Beauty contribution to the proton structure function and charm results

Open Issues in DIS The High Energy Perspective

Proton Structure Functions: Experiments, Models and Uncertainties.

3.2 DIS in the quark parton model (QPM)

Measurements of charm and beauty proton structure functions F2 c c and F2 b b at HERA

High Energy Physics. Lecture 9. Deep Inelastic Scattering Scaling Violation. HEP Lecture 9 1

INCLUSIVE D- AND B-MESON PRODUCTION

Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004

Lecture 3 Cross Section Measurements. Ingredients to a Cross Section

PDF at LHC and 100 TeV Collider

LHC Collider Phenomenology

Hard QCD and Hadronic Final State at HERA. Alice Valkárová, on behalf of H1 and ZEUS Collaborations

Physique des Particules Avancées 2

Physics at HERA. Summer Student Lectures August Katja Krüger Kirchhoff Institut für Physik H1 Collaboration

QCD and low x physics

Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ATLAS Detector

Diffractive PDF fits and factorisation tests at HERA

Physics at HERA. Contents HERA and ZEUS Electroweak results Structure of the proton. Katsuo Tokushuku (KEK, ZEUS)

Study of Inclusive Jets Production in ep Interactions at HERA

F c 2 measurements at HERA. Katerina Lipka

Electroweak Physics and Searches for New Physics at HERA

Precision QCD measurements at HERA

Outline: Introduction Quantum ChromoDynamics (QCD) Jet algorithms Tests of QCD QCD analyses at HERA extraction of the proton PDFs

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)309. Electroweak Physics at LHCb

Limits on the effective quark radius and the contact-interaction mass scales from inclusive ep scattering at HERA. Aleksander Filip Żarnecki

NNPDF. Progress in the NNPDF global analysis. Juan Rojo! STFC Rutherford Fellow! Rudolf Peierls Center for Theoretical Physics! University of Oxford!

Physics at Hadron Colliders Partons and PDFs

CT14 Intrinsic Charm Parton Distribution Functions from CTEQ-TEA Global Analysis

Proton PDFs constraints from measurements using the ATLAS experiment

Particles and Deep Inelastic Scattering

Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at HERA

The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology

Lepton-hadron collider for the 2020s, based on the high lumi LHC Can we add ep and ea collisions to the existing LHC pp, AA and pa programme?

The structure of the proton and the LHC

Moriond QCD. Latest Jets Results from the LHC. Klaus Rabbertz, KIT. Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz

Progress in CTEQ-TEA (Tung et al.) PDF Analysis

Multijet in Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering

Parton Distribution Functions and the LHC

Intrinsic Heavy Quarks

Status and news of the ABM PDFs

PoS(ICHEP 2010)170. D +, D 0 and Λ + c production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

, 2004 Peter Schleper University of Hamburg Strasbourg, March 12 HC: The decade of Hadron machines L evatron HERA

Parton Distribution Functions, Part 1. Daniel Stump. Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University

Jet and photon production and

W, Z and top production measurements at LHCb

New results from CMS for PDF studies

NNPDF3.0. & parton distributions for the LHC run II. Maria Ubiali. University of Cambridge

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

HEAVY QUARKS FROM PHOTOPRODUCTION (AND DIS)

Electroweak constraints from HERA. 1 Introduction. Elisabetta Gallo INFN Firenze Via G. Sansone 1 I Sesto Fiorentino, ITALY

ZEUS results for EPS-HEP combined ZEUS+H1 result

Outline. Heavy elementary particles. HERA Beauty quark production at HERA LHC. Top quark production at LHC Summary & conclusions

Structure Functions at Very High Q 2 From HERA

Recent QCD results from ATLAS

Electroweak measurements at HERA

Charm and Beauty Structure of the proton

Research in QCD factorization

Future Perspectives in HEP Jet Physics and Precision Tests of QCD

Physics and Physics prospects at HERA

Physics at LHC. lecture one. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden

Measurements of the Vector boson production with the ATLAS Detector

QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets

The TMDpdf determination at NLO using parton branching method

The gluon PDF: from LHC heavy quark production to neutrino astrophysics

Introduction to the physics of hard probes in hadron collisions: lecture I. Michelangelo Mangano TH Division, CERN

Quantum Chromodynamics at LHC

Measurement of F L at HERA. S. Glazov, DESY, Ringberg 2008

CT10, CT14 and META parton distributions

X COLLIDER PHYSICS : BASIC CONCEPTS

QCD at hadron colliders Lecture 3: Parton Distribution Functions

Nuclear PDFs: latest update

ZEUS New Results. Wesley H. Smith, University of Wisconsin on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration DIS 2004, Strbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 14, 2004

PDFs, the LHC and the Higgs

Gluons at high x in Nuclei at EIC

Paul Newman Birmingham University. Can we add ep and ea collisions to the existing LHC pp, AA and pa programme?

Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory

Status of parton distributions and impact on the Higgs

PoS(DIFF2006)005. Inclusive diffraction in DIS H1 Results. Paul Laycock

Physics Results on the Tagged Structure Functions at HERA

Transcription:

Proton Structure from HERA and the impact for the LHC Katerina Lipka, DESY for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Lomonosov Conference on High Energy Physics 13

Proton structure: fundamental subject in matter studies baryonic matter nucleons (protons, neutrons) mass M N ~ 1 GeV u u d partons (quarks & qluons) valence quarks (u, d) quantum properties BUT: M u ~.3 M N, M d ~.6 M N Origin of the proton mass: QCD energy parton composition, coupling, masses and momentum distributions 1

Proton structure in quark-parton model Point-like constituents (partons) behave incoherently Probability f(x) for a parton f to carry the fraction x of the nucleon momentum is an intrinsic property of the nucleon, i.e. process independent Learn about the nucleon structure via lepton-nucleon scattering Electron-proton scattering in parton picture Electron scatters off a charged constituent (parton) of the proton Identify the charged partons with quarks γ, Z exchange: Neutral Current (NC) W ± exchange: Charged Current (CC)

Proton structure in quark-parton model Point-like constituents (partons) behave incoherently Probability f(x) for a parton f to carry the fraction x of the nucleon momentum is an intrinsic property of the nucleon, i.e. process independent Learn about the nucleon structure via lepton-nucleon scattering Electron-proton scattering in parton picture Kinematics 4-momentum transfer Q defines distance scale r at which proton is probed Proton Q r ~1.6 fm Q =-q photon virtuality r hc/q =.[fm]/q[gev] 3

Proton structure in quark-parton model Point-like constituents (partons) behave incoherently Probability f(x) for a parton f to carry the fraction x of the nucleon momentum is an intrinsic property of the nucleon, i.e. process independent Learn about the nucleon structure via lepton-nucleon scattering Electron-proton scattering in parton picture Kinematics Infinite proton momentum frame: Q =-q photon virtuality x=-q /p q Bjorken scaling partons do not interact, move parallel to the proton, massless, no transverse momentum parton i carries fraction xi of Pp <xi<1, xi =1 4

Proton structure in quark-parton model Point-like constituents (partons) behave incoherently Probability f(x) for a parton f to carry the fraction x of the nucleon momentum is an intrinsic property of the nucleon, i.e. process independent Lepton-proton scattering cross section and proton structure functions Neutral Current measured cross-section γ*, Z d σ e± p dxdq πα xq 4 (1 + (1 y) )F y F L xf 3 structure functions F x f q f + q f parton distributions Q =-q photon virtuality x=-q /p q Bjorken scaling y inelasticity Bjorken scaling: if partons do not interact, q=q(x); F=F(x) 5

Proton structure in Quantum ChromoDynamics Quarks do interact via gluon exchange. Probability via splitting functions: g(x) q(x) P q(x) qg P qq P gq P gg q(z) q(z) q(z-x) g(z) g(z) g(z-x) q(z-x) g(x) g(z-x) Parton Distribution Functions: number of partons in the proton, carrying momentum between xp and (x+dx)p, as resolved at Q. Scaling violation: F (x) F (x,q ), q(x) q(x,q ) 6

Proton structure in Quantum ChromoDynamics Quarks do interact via gluon exchange. Probability via splitting functions: g(x) q(x) P q(x) qg P qq P gq P gg q(z) q(z) q(z-x) g(z) g(z) g(z-x) q(z-x) g(x) g(z-x) Parton Distribution Functions: number of partons in the proton, carrying momentum between xp and (x+dx)p, as resolved at Q. Scaling violation: F (x) F (x,q ), q(x) q(x,q ) Additional dependence on Q quantitatively described in perturbative QCD via Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) Evolution Equations q(x, Q ) lnq g(x, Q ) lnq 1 x 1 x dz z dz z x x q(z,q )P qq + g(z,q )P qg z z x x q(z,q )P gq + g(z,q )P gg z z Quark and gluon PDF coupled in DGLAP PDFs determined experimentally, mostly using data on Deep Inelastic Scattering 6

DIS at Hadron-Electron-Ring-Accelerator at DESY World-only ep collider Energies and rates of cosmic ray particles E p =46-9 GeV protons E e =7.6 GeV electrons E dn/de (GeV cm - sr -1 s -1 ) Unique machine to study the proton structure e p compatible with 5 TeV γ beam on a fixed p target HERA measurements 7

DIS at Hadron-Electron-Ring-Accelerator at DESY World-only ep collider E p =46-9 GeV E e =7.6 GeV protons HERA I : 199- HERA II: 3-7 collider experiments H1 & ZEUS, s max = 318 GeV integrated Luminosity electrons ~.5 fb -1 / experiment HERA switched off June 7, analyses ongoing Central on the way to final precision Tracker H1 and ZEUS combine experimental data accounting for systematic correlations HERA performs the QCD analysis of (semi) inclusive DIS data (HERAPDF) H1 and ZEUS collaborations provide/support the PDF Fitting Tool (HERAFitter) 7

Kinematics at HERA as compared to the LHC DIS at HERA: clean lepton probe Kinematics reconstructed from the scattered lepton (or hadronic final state) fi(x) Proton-proton collision at LHC E 1 ŝ = τs = x 1 x s Reconstruction of x1 and x not straightforward E x 1, = M s exp(±y) 8

Kinematics at HERA as compared to the LHC DIS at HERA: clean lepton probe HERA covers low, medium x range of the LHC Q evolution via QCD fi(x) LHC TEVATRON Proton-proton collision at LHC E 1 ŝ = τs = x 1 x s DGLAP HERA E x 1, = M s exp(±y) HERA data: backbone for PDF determination 1 9

Structure functions in DIS and proton PDFs DIS cross sections provide an access to parton distribution functions in proton γ, Z Exchange: Neutral Current ep e X d σ e± P dxdq LO : F i = πα xq 4 [Y +F Y xf 3 y F L ] (q i (x)+ q i (x)) dominant contribution LO : F 3 i (q i (x) q i (x)) γ/z interference NLO : F L x α S g(x, Q ) contribution from gluon W ± Exchange: Charged Current ep ν X σ e+ p CC x{(ū + c)+(1 y) (d + s)} x{(u + c)+(1 y) ( d + s)} σ e p CC sensitive to individual quark flavours

Recent results on Neutral Current Cross Sections JHEP 9:61 (1) precision 1.5% for Q < 5 GeV arxiv:8:6138 xf γz 3 x q val JHEP 9:61 (1) Q =15 GeV F γz q q gluon distribution via scaling violations sensitivity to valence composition 11

Recent results on Charged Current Cross Sections HERA II: improvement in precision: e+ (e-) p by a factor of 3 () luminosity wrt. HERA I JHEP 9:61 (1) improved sensitivity to quark flavour composition 1

Combined HERA DIS Cross Sections Neutral Current H1 and ZEUS Charged Current H1 and ZEUS r,nc (x,q ) ± 3 1-1 - HERA I+II NC e + p (prel.) HERA I+II NC e - p (prel.) x =. (x3.) x =.3 (x17.) HERAPDF1.5 e + p HERAPDF1.5 e - p x =.5 (x9.) x =.8 (x5.) x =.13 (x.) x =.18 (x8.) x =.5 (x.4) x =.4 (x.7) x =.65 3 4 5 Q / GeV HERA Inclusive Working Group August r,cc (x,q ) - 1.5 1.5 1.5.8.6.4. Q = 3 GeV Q = 5 GeV Q = GeV Q = 15 GeV Q = GeV Q = 3 GeV Q = 5 GeV Q = 8 GeV - -1 - -1 Q = 15 GeV Q = 3 GeV - -1 - -1 x x HERA Inclusive Working Group August HERA I+II CC e - p (prel.) HERAPDF1.5 Preliminary H1 and ZEUS measurements are combined accounting for correlations Impressive precision up to high Q and high x QCD analysis of combined HERA NC and CC data: HERAPDF 13

HERA parton density functions HERAPDF1.5: most precise DIS data, recommended HERA PDF set xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II Combined PDF Fit HERAI +HERAII (prel.) xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.5 (prel.) exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 x HERA Structure Functions Working Group July DGLAP evolution (QCDNUM, arxiv:5.1481) Heavy quarks: massive Variable Flavour Number Scheme Scales: µ r = µ f = Q, starting scale 1.9 GeV Experimentally uncertainty (Δχ =1) Parameterization at starting scale: Model assumptions: Q min =3.5 GeV, α s (M Z )=.1176 m c =1.4 GeV; m b =4.75 GeV; f s (Q )=.31 14

HERA parton density functions HERAPDF1.5 NLO and NNLO most precise DIS data, proper treatment of correlation of errors, allows for model studies Available in LHAPDF with eigenvectors for uncertainties and αs variation Describes LHC data very well, used in ATLAS, CMS and LHCb analyses xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit xs (.5) NNLO -3 xg (.5) - HERAPDF1.5 NNLO (prel.) exp. uncert. Q = GeV model uncert. parametrization uncert. xd v -1 xu v 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 Final combination of HERA inclusive data and QCD analysis on the way (HERAPDF.) 15

i Precision QCD: jet production at HERA (Multi)-jet production directly sensitive to the strong coupling constant DIS, 15 GeV < Q < 15 GeV Normalised Inclusive Jet Normalised Dijet Normalised Trijet H1 Preliminary Photoproduction Q ~ Nuclear Physics B 864 (1) 1 Jet / NC 8 6 4 NLO c had NLOJet++ and fastnlo QCDNUM CT, s =.118 15 < Q < GeV (i = ) < Q < 7 GeV (i = 8) 7 < Q < 4 GeV (i = 6) 4 < Q < 7 GeV (i = 4) 7 < Q < 5 GeV 1 (i = ) 5 < Q < 15 GeV (i = ) - +.3 -. +.4 7 5 P T,Jet 7 5 P T Dijet 7 5 P T Trijet [GeV] αs(mz)=.6 (exp) -.35 (theory) +.11 +.4 αs(mz)=.1163 (exp) (theory) Measure αs running in a single experiment different measurement methods agree -.11 -.4 < 1% experimental error 16

Additional Constraints on PDFs: Charm at HERA stringent test of QCD, direct probe of the gluon Eur. Phys. J. C 73:311 (13), [arxiv:111.118] e γ c, b cc _ red. H1 VTX H1 D* HERA-I ZEUS D* 98- ZEUS D H1 D* HERA-II ZEUS c µ X ZEUS D* 96-97 ZEUS D + H1 and ZEUS Q =.5 GeV Q =5 GeV Q =7 GeV p g(x) c, b.5 Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV use different tagging methods: - meson reconstruction, - large mass and long lifetime.5 Q =6 GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV combination: - orthogonal uncertainties - take into account correlations.5 Q =35 GeV Q =65 GeV Q = GeV HERA -4-3 - -4-3 - -4-3 - x 17

Additional Constraints on PDFs: Charm at HERA stringent test of QCD, direct probe of the gluon Eur. Phys. J. C 73:311 (13), [arxiv:111.118] p e γ g(x) c, b c, b use different tagging methods: - meson reconstruction, - large mass and long lifetime _ cc red.6.4 H1 VTX cc _ red H1 D* HERA-II..5.5 H1 D* HERA-I H1 VTX ZEUS c µ X H1 D* HERA-II H1 D* HERA-I ZEUS c µ X ZEUS D* 98- ZEUS D* 96-97 ZEUS D ZEUS D + H1 and ZEUS Q =.5 GeV Q =5 GeV Q =7 GeV Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV H1 and ZEUS ZEUS D* 98- ZEUS D* 96-97 HERA ZEUS D ZEUS D + Q =18 Q =6 GeV GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV combination: - orthogonal uncertainties - take into account correlations..5 Q =35 GeV Q =65 GeV Q = GeV HERA -3 - -4-3 - x -4-3 - -4-3 - x Precision ~ 5% at medium Q reached 17

Additional Constraints on PDFs: Charm at HERA Eur. Phys. J. C 73:311 (13), [arxiv:111.118] Inclusion of charm: reduced uncertainty on gluon, charm and light sea...mostly due to better constrained charm-quark mass 18

Additional Constraints on PDFs: Charm at HERA Determination of mc(mc) MS at NLO Study mc -choice in variable flavor number schemes mc(mc) = 1.6 ±.5exp ±.3mod±.par±.αs GeV perform PDF fit varying mc in FFNS coefficients Eur. Phys. J. C 73:311 (13), [arxiv:111.118] Consistent with the world average mc(mc)wa = 1.75 ±.5 GeV Different schemes prefer different Mc 19

Additional Constraints on PDFs: Charm at HERA Prediction for W+ (W-, Z ) production at the LHC Study mc -choice in variable flavor number schemes Eur. Phys. J. C 73:311 (13), [arxiv:111.118] Uncertainty due to differences in charm treatment in PDFs significantly reduced by using optimal Mc Different schemes prefer different Mc

HERAFitter: Open-Source Modular Tool for QCD Analysis Developed at HERA, extended to LHC and theory groups, https://www.herafitter.org/herafitter Study the impact of different data on PDFs and test different theory approaches r,nc (x,q ) + 1.6 1.4 1. 1.8.6.4. x=. H1 and ZEUS x=. HERA I NC e + p ZEUS H1 x=.8 x=.3 1 3 4 /d y T (CTEQ 6.6)/dp /d y /d T /dp d 1.8 1.6 1.4 1. 1.8.6.4 anti-k t jets. R =.4 (.< y <.3) PDF (CL9) Data CTEQ 6.6 HERAPDF 1. ATLAS Preliminary HERAPDF 1.5 GJR 8 x=.8 x=.5 Q / GeV experimental input Tevatron inclusive jet cross sections 3 [pb/gev] jet jet d /dy dp T 11 9 7 5 3-1 -3-5 -7-9 -11-13 -15 p [GeV] T 3 4 5 6 7 jet p [GeV] processes: NC, CC DIS, jets, diffraction, heavy quarks (c,b,t) Drell-Yan, W production theoretical calculations/tools Heavy quark schemes: MSTW, CTEQ, ABM Jets, W, Z production: fastnlo, Applgrid Top production NNLO (Hathor) QCD Evolution DGLAP (QCDNUM) kt factorisation Alternative tools NNPDF reweighting Other models Dipole model + Different error treatment models + Tools for data combination (HERAaverager) D RunII NLOjet++ (HERAPDF1.5) + nonperturbative corr. jet 6 y <.4 (x ) jet 3.4 < y <.8 (x ) jet.8 < y < 1. jet -3 1. < y < 1.6 (x ) jet -6 1.6 < y <. (x ) jet -9. < y <.4 (x ) experiments: HERA, Tevatron, LHC, fixed target HERAFitter xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.5 NNLO (prel.) exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 PDF or DPDF,... αs (MZ),mc,mb,mt, fs,.. Theory predictions Benchmarking Comparison of schemes x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 1

Summary HERA data are unique and of particular importance for PDF determination HERA II inclusive DIS cross section measurements are published H1+ZEUS combination and analysis towards HERAPDF. ongoing HERA jet and charm data provide additional constrains on αs and charm-quark mass HERA Expertise in QCD analysis preserved in HERAFitter development developed and supported by several experiments and theory groups allows experimentalists to perform QCD analysis and test theory approaches open source program, successfully used by the LHC experiments

Back up

Determination of parton density functions Structure function factorization: for the exchange of Boson V (γ, Z, W ± ) F V (x, Q )= from measured cross sections i=q, q,g 1 x dz C V,i (x z,q,µ F,µ R, α S ) f i (z,µ F,µ R ) calculable in pqcd PDF x-dependence of PDFs is not calculable in perturbative QCD: parameterize at a starting scale Q : f(x)=axb (1-x) C (1+Dx+Ex ) evolve these PDFs using DGLAP equations to Q >Q construct structure functions from PDFs and coefficient functions: predictions for every data point in (x, Q ) plane χ - fit to the experimental data

HERA Inclusive DIS Measurements at highest Q ] [pb/gev d /dq NC and CC cross sections at large scales: Inclusive HERA I and II data precision NC: ~1.5%, CC: ~4% -1-3 -5-7 Neutral Current Charged Current H1 e p CC + H1 e p CC ZEUS e p CC HERA II + ZEUS e p CC HERA II SM e p CC (HERAPDF 1.5) + SM e p CC (HERAPDF 1.5) y <.9 P e = 3 HERA textbook measurements in electroweak physics HERA H1 e p NC + H1 e p NC ZEUS e 4 p NC HERA II + ZEUS e p NC HERA II SM e p NC (HERAPDF 1.5) + SM e p NC (HERAPDF 1.5) Electroweak unification Q [GeV ] [pb] CC arxiv:8.6138 JHEP 9:61 (1) EPJC 6 (9) 65 EPJC 7 () 945 EPJC 61 (9) 3 SM: zero cross section for a RH e- or LH e+ 8 6 4 ± HERA Charged Current e p Scattering Q > 4 GeV y <.9 e + p X H1 ZEUS p X - -5 5 [%] e HERAPDF 1.5 H1 ZEUS HERAPDF 1.5 P e Good agreement with the SM 6

Combination Procedure Minimized value: µ i measured value at point i δ i statistical, uncorrelated systematic error γ j j correlated systematic error b j shift of correlated systematic error sources m i _ true value (corresponds to min χ ) Measurements performed sometimes in slightly different range of (x,q ) swimming to the common (x,q ) grid via NLO QCD in massive scheme

HERAPDF1.7: DIS+ low energy+jets+charm Flexible parametrization heavy flavours: mc=1.5±.15 GeV αs (MZ)=.119 steeper gluon as HERAPDF1.6 xf 1.8.6.4. -4 HERA I+II inclusive, jets, charm PDF Fit xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.7 (prel.) exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. HERAPDF1.6 (prel.) - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group June 11 Including the jet and the charm data: decouple the gluon from αs and mc

Heavy Quarks and PDF Fits Factorization: F V (x, Q )= i=q, q,g 1 x dz C V,i (x z,q,µ F,µ R, α S ) f i (z,µ F,µ R ) i - number of active flavours in the proton: defines the factorization (HQ) scheme i fixed : Fixed Flavour Number Scheme (FFNS) only light flavours in the proton: i = 3 (4) c- (b-) quarks massive, produced in boson-gluon fusion Q» m HQ : can be less precise, NLO coefficients contain terms ~ ln Q m HQ i variable: Variable Flavour Number Scheme (VFNS) - Zero Mass VFNS: all flavours massless. Breaks down at Q ~m HQ - Generalized Mass VFNS: different implementations provided by PDF groups smooth matching with FFNS for Q m HQ must be assured QCD analysis of the proton structure: treatment of heavy quarks essential

Heavy Quark Production at HERA Heavy quarks in ep scattering produced in boson-gluon fusion e γ c (b) Contribution to total DIS cross section: charm: ~ 3% at large Q p g(x) c (b) beauty: at most few % Gluon directly involved: cross-check of g(x) from NC and CC DIS cross sections HQ contributions to the proton structure function F : (e.g. charm) Direct test of HQ schemes in PDF fits

HERA Charm Data test PDFs obtained with inclusive DIS HERAPDF is obtained using only inclusive HERA DIS NC and CC data, use VFNS Describes charm cross-sections very good Uncertainty band mostly due to variation of charm quark mass in PDF: 1.35<mc<1.65 GeV red cc. Q =.5 GeV Q = 5 GeV H1 and ZEUS Q = 7 GeV Sensitivity to charm mass in PDF fit increased once HERA charm data used together with inclusive DIS data.5 Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV ) c (M 8 75 HERA-I inclusive H1 and ZEUS Charm + HERA-I inclusive opt M c =1.5 ±.6 GeV.5 Q =6 GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV 7 65 RT standard inclusive+ charm DIS.5 Q =35 GeV Q =65 GeV Q = GeV HERA HERAPDF1.5 6 inclusive DIS only -4-3 - -4-3 - -4-3 - x 55 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 M c [GeV]

HERA Charm Data vs QCD Analysis in FFNS QCD Predictions at NLO (~αs ) and NNLO (~αs 3 ) describe data very well Running mass of charm quark is used in coefficient functions in QCD analysis H1 and ZEUS Determine mc(mc) in MS at NLO cc _ red..5 Q =.5 GeV Q =5 GeV Q =7 GeV Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV 7 68 H1 and ZEUS Charm + HERA-I inclusive FF (ABM) mc(mc) m= c (m1.6 )=1.6 ±.5 GeV c ±.5exp ±.3mod±.par±.αs GeV.5 Q =6 GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV 66 64 perform PDF fit varying mc in FFNS coefficients.5 Q =35 GeV -4-3 - Q =65 GeV -4-3 - HERA Q = GeV ABM9NNLO MS ABM9NLO MS -4-3 - x 6 1 1. 1.4 1.6 m c (m ) [GeV] c Consistent with the world average mc(mc)wa = 1.75 ±.5 GeV

cc _ red. HERA Charm Data vs QCD Analysis in VFNS Data are confronted to predictions using Variable-Flavour Number Scheme at NLO (αs) and NNLO (αs ) H1 and ZEUS Q =.5 GeV Q =5 GeV Q =7 GeV cc _ red. H1 and ZEUS Q =.5 GeV Q =5 GeV Q =7 GeV.5 Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV.5 Q =1 GeV Q =18 GeV Q =3 GeV.5 Q =6 GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV.5 Q =6 GeV Q = GeV Q = GeV.5 Q =35 GeV Q =65 GeV Q = GeV HERA.5 Q =35 GeV Q =65 GeV Q = GeV HERA MSTW8NNLO MSWT8NNLO (opt.) CTNLO CTNNLO (prel.) -4-3 - -4-3 - -4-3 - x -4-3 - -4-3 - -4-3 - x Predictions using heavy quark coefficients at higher order describe data better at lower Q

Charm mass in Variable Flavor Number Scheme Study charm mass choice in PDF using different VFNS implementations using HERAFitter ) c (M 75 Charm + HERA-I inclusive H1 and ZEUS different implementation of VFNS use mc pole in the HQ coefficients 7 RT standard RT optimised ACOT-full S-ACOT- ZM-VFNS opt M C matching between Nflavor to Nflavor+1, (choosing an interpolation approach and different methods for truncation of the perturbative series) definition of mc(pole) gets as uncertain as matching conditions: mc pole Mc 65 6 parameter Mc is implicitly used in predictions for the LHC processes using VFNS PDFs (CTEQ, MSTW, NNPDF, HERAPDF) 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 M c [GeV] Different schemes prefer different Mc

Effect of charm mass in VFNS PDF on σ(w, Z) at NLO NLO prediction for W+ (W-, Z ) production at the LHC: dependence on charm mass in PDF Larger M c charm σ W

Effect of charm mass in VFNS PDF on σ(w, Z) at NLO NLO prediction for W+ (W-, Z ) production at the LHC: dependence on charm mass in PDF Only one HQ scheme Mc variation in PDF 1.3 < Mc < 1.5 GeV 3% uncertainty on W prediction Larger M c charm σ W

Effect of charm mass in VFNS PDF on σ(w, Z) at NLO NLO prediction for W+ (W-, Z ) production at the LHC: dependence on charm mass in PDF Only Several one HQ schemes Mc variation in PDF 1.3 < Mc < 1.5 GeV 3% uncertainty on W prediction Using different HQ schemes: + 7% uncertainty Larger M c charm σ W

Data sensitivity to different heavy quark treatments in PDFs NLO prediction for W+ (W-, Z ) production at the LHC: dependence on charm mass in PDF [nb] - W 44 4 Use optimal Mc in each scheme Charm + HERA-I inclusive RT standard RT optimised ACOT-full S-ACOT- ZM-VFNS opt M C < % H1 and ZEUS ) c (M 75 7 Charm + HERA-I inclusive RT standard RT optimised ACOT-full S-ACOT- ZM-VFNS opt M C H1 and ZEUS 4 65 38 s = 7 TeV 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 M c [GeV] 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 [GeV] Uncertainty due to differences in charm treatment in PDFs significantly reduced by using optimal Mc in each HQ scheme in PDF 6 M c

Heavy Quarks in PDFs and W/Z at LHC Prediction of W ± cross section @ LHC: dominant uncertainty due to PDF s=14 TeV NLO HERAPDF1. Prediction using m c =1.4 GeV Error band: PDF uncertainty Experimental error Parametrization variation Model assumptions including mc variation rapidity mc variation in PDF: significant uncertainty on W@LHC in central region

(HERA)PDF and top quark at the LHC Top quark at CMS: cross section @ approx. NNLO Q =4mt HERAPDF1.5NNLO _ t t (pb) 6 4 approx. NNLO (Langenfeld et al.) HERAPDF15NNLO only PDF uncertainties (68% CL): experimental parametrization model variations: Q > 5 GeV thanks A. Cooper-Sarkar CMS (Prel.) CMS-PAS-TOP-11-5 (11) 14 15 16 17 18 19 m t pole (GeV) Dominant uncertainty: variation of Q min imposed on data used in the fit top quark production at the LHC has potential to constrain the high-x gluon

PDF fits using HERA jet data: fixed αs xu v xs 1.8.6.4..4. -. -.4 8 7 6 5 4 3 1.4. -. -.4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit with Jets -4-4 -3-3 Q = GeV - Q = GeV - -1 1 x -1 1 x xd v xg 1.8.6.4..4. -. -.4 16 14 1 8 6 4-4.4. -. -.4-4 -3-3 Q = GeV HERAPDF1.6 (prel.) Exp. uncert. Model uncert. Param uncert. HERAPDF1.5f (prel.) - Q = GeV - -1 1 x -1 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 Inclusive DIS data: combined HERAI+HERAII Jet data: H1 high Q, EPJ C65 () low Q, EPJ C67 () ZEUS incl. jets PLB547 () incl.+jets NP B765 (7) PDF Fit: - flexible parametrisation - αs(mz) fixed Inclusion of jet data into the PDF fit using fixed αs does not have large impact 13

PDF fits with free αs (MZ) xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit no jet data xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.5f (prel.) free s (M ) Z exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 14

PDF fits with free αs (MZ) xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit no jet data xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.5f (prel.) free s (M ) Z exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 xf 1.8.6.4. -4 H1 and ZEUS HERA I+II PDF Fit with Jets + jet data xg (.5) xs (.5) -3 HERAPDF1.6 (prel.) free s (M ) Z exp. uncert. model uncert. parametrization uncert. - Q = GeV xu v xd v -1 1 x HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 Inclusion of jet data into the PDF fit decouples the gluon and αs (MZ)

αs (MZ) from PDF fits including HERA jet data min - Scan of the αs (MZ) in the PDF fit 15 5 H1 and ZEUS (prel.) no jet data + jet data HERAPDF1.5f HERAPDF1.6.114.116.118.1.1.14.16 S (M ) Z HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 HERAPDF1.6 Preliminary H1 high Q H1 low Q k T Eur. Phys. J. C67, 1 () PDF and αs (MZ) determined in the common fit: Eur. Phys. J. C65, 363 () norm. k T multijets multijets ZEUS incl. k T jets 96-97 Phys. Lett. B 547, 164 () ZEUS incl. k T jets 98- Phys. Lett. B 649, 1 (7) World average S. Bethke, Eur. Phys. J. C64, 689 (9) H1 and ZEUS (prel.) αs (MZ)=. ±.13exp ±.7model/param ±.1had+.45scale exp. uncert. th. uncert..11.1.13 s (M ) Z HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group March 11 From including the Jet data in the PDF fit: determine gluon and αs (MZ)

HERAFitter: Open-Source Modular Tool for QCD Analysis Open source code, available at https://www.herafitter.org/herafitter Version.3. released in March 13. Joined effort of experimentalists, theorists and tool-developers Successfully used by the LHC experiments