Contents... 1 Intro... 1 Giving guarantees... 2

Similar documents
ISO/TC 180/SC. Date: ISO/xxxx yyyy. Secretariat: SA. Solar energy Collector fields Check of performance. Énergie solaire xxx yyy

Chapter 11: Heat Exchangers. Dr Ali Jawarneh Department of Mechanical Engineering Hashemite University

Development and Validation of Flat-Plate Collector Testing Procedures

Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient

The Research of Heat Transfer Area for 55/19 Steam Generator

Development and Validation of Flat-Plate Collector Testing Procedures

PROPOSED SOLUTION - ASSIGNMENT 5

SOME ASPECTS ON PARABOLIC TROUGH FIELD OPERATION WITH OIL AS A HEAT TRANSFER FLUID

Simplified Collector Performance Model

1 / 17. TÜV Rheinland (Shanghai) Co., Ltd Solar/ Fuelcell Technologies. Test Report

Dynamic simulation of DH house stations

Heat Exchangers for Condensation and Evaporation Applications Operating in a Low Pressure Atmosphere

Chapter 5 MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE EVACATED SOLAR COLLECTOR. 5.1 Thermal Model of Solar Collector System

UNIT FOUR SOLAR COLLECTORS

ANSI/AHRI Standard (Formerly ARI Standard ) 2006 Standard for Performance Rating of Desuperheater/Water Heaters

A. Solar Walls. B. Prototype I

8.1 Technically Feasible Design of a Heat Exchanger

1/54 Circulation pump, safety valve, expansion vessel

Collector test according to EN ,2:2002

INSTRUCTOR: PM DR MAZLAN ABDUL WAHID

Solar radiation and thermal performance of solar collectors for Denmark

Collector test according to EN ,2:2006

Monthly performance of passive and active solar stills for different Indian climatic conditions

Development and Validation of Flat-Plate Collector Testing Procedures

Solar Flat Plate Thermal Collector

Thermal conductivity measurement of two microencapsulated phase change slurries

Double-Skin Facade in Low-Latitude: Study on the Absorptance, Reflectance, and Transmittance of Direct Solar Radiation

Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of the Overall Heat Loss Coefficient of a Vacuum Tube Solar Collector

Cooling of Electronics Lecture 2

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

T718. c Dr. Md. Zahurul Haq (BUET) HX: Energy Balance and LMTD ME 307 (2018) 2/ 21 T793

Collector test according to EN ,2 : 2006

Experiment 1. Measurement of Thermal Conductivity of a Metal (Brass) Bar

PROBLEM The heat rate, q, can be evaluated from an energy balance on the cold fluid, 225 kg/h J. 3600s/h

Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science

Principles of Food and Bioprocess Engineering (FS 231) Problems on Heat Transfer

HEAT EXCHANGER. Objectives

Validation of IDA Indoor Climate and Energy

TOLERANCES AND UNCERTAINTIES IN PERFORMANCE DATA OF REFRIGERANT COMPRESSORS JANUARY 2017

HEAT LOSS SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT LINEAR FRESNEL COLLECTOR RECEIVER GEOMETRIES

1D-HAM. Coupled Heat, Air and Moisture Transport in Multi-layered Wall Structures. Manual with brief theory and an example. Version 2.

Project Memorandum. N N o. = e (ρx)(µ/ρ) (1)

INVESTIGATIONS ON SOLAR THERMAL PROCESS HEAT INTEGRATION WITH PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTORS

3-1. Heat Dissipation Design Method. Power Dissipation Loss Calculation Usage of The Cooler with Water Jacket 3-7 Flange Adapter Kit 3-10

arxiv: v1 [physics.app-ph] 25 Mar 2018

FIELD TEST OF WATER-STEAM SEPARATORS FOR THE DSG PROCESS

A fire resistance assessment case history G.C. and M.E. Giuliani

THE SIMPLIFIED CALCULUS OF THE FLAT PLATE SOLAR COLLECTOR

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF HEAT PUMP MODELS. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EQUATION-FIT AND REFRIGERANT CYCLE BASED MODELS.

TÜV Rheinland PTL, LLC 2210 South Roosevelt Street Tempe, AZ Test Report

Countercurrent heat exchanger

The energy performance of an airflow window

Effects of Nanofluids Thermo-Physical Properties on the Heat Transfer and 1 st law of Thermodynamic in a Serpentine PVT System

Chapter 7: External Forced Convection. Dr Ali Jawarneh Department of Mechanical Engineering Hashemite University

Plate heat exchangers DV285 series, type E

REPORT NUMBER: GZU -001 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:

The influence of solar radiation on the distribution of temperatures in historic masonry

VALIDATION OF A TRNSYS SIMULATION MODEL FOR PCM ENERGY STORAGES AND PCM WALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS

Analyzing Mass and Heat Transfer Equipment

Definitions of U- and g-value in case of double skin facades or vented windows

FORSCHUNGS- UND TESTZENTRUM FÜR SOLARANLAGEN. Institut für Thermodynamik und Wärmetechnik Universität Stuttgart

Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigerating, Sixth Edition, First Printing ERRATA

NEGST. New generation of solar thermal systems. Advanced applications ENEA. Comparison of solar cooling technologies. Vincenzo Sabatelli

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE AIR FLOW AROUND THE ARRAYS OF SOLAR COLLECTORS

The Electrodynamics of a Pair of PV Modules with Connected Building Resistance

Chapter 3 NATURAL CONVECTION

Gas Technology Institute UTSR Fellow: Miad Karimi. > Summer 2017

In order to optimize the shell and coil heat exchanger design using the model presented in Chapter

EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF TRIPLE CONCENTRIC TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER

Exergy Analysis of Solar Air Collector Having W Shaped Artificial Roughness

Construction and performance analysis of a three dimensional compound parabolic concentrator for a spherical absorber

Certificate: / 29 April 2014

Evaluating a Site s Solar Potential May, 2003

1. Nusselt number and Biot number are computed in a similar manner (=hd/k). What are the differences between them? When and why are each of them used?

METHODS OF FINDING A SOLUTION

Monitoring of a Concentrating Solar Thermal Field: Energy Measurements and Uncertainty Analysis

Study on the improved recuperator design used in the direct helium-turbine power conversion cycle of HTR-10

not for commercial-scale installations. Thus, there is a need to study the effects of snow on

Thermal Unit Operation (ChEg3113)

Thermal sensitive foils in physics experiments

Numerical Study of PCM Melting in Evacuated Solar Collector Storage System

Flow Management Devices, LLC An ISO 9000:2008 Certified Company

N. Lemcoff 1 and S.Wyatt 2. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Hartford. Alstom Power


EUROVENT 8/12 SOUND TEST METHOD FOR DUCTED FAN COIL UNITS. FCP 2008 testing procedures FCP acoustical test method pag. 1

Simulation of Free Convection with Conjugate Heat Transfer

ECE309 INTRODUCTION TO THERMODYNAMICS & HEAT TRANSFER. 3 August 2004

PSA on Extreme Weather Phenomena for NPP Paks

Heat and Mass Transfer Unit-1 Conduction

Aalborg Universitet. Empirical Test Case Specification Larsen, Olena Kalyanova; Heiselberg, Per Kvols. Publication date: 2006

Energy balance and melting of a glacier surface

SECTION 1 - WHAT IS A BTU METER? BTU's = Flow x ΔT Any ISTEC BTU Meter System consists of the following main components:

Project Two. James K. Peterson. March 26, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503

DESIGN AND COST ANALYSIS OF HEAT TRANSFER EQUIPMENTS

Introduction to Heat and Mass Transfer

Measuring Albedo. Materials Light meters Student worksheets

Interactivity-Compatibility. TA Hydronic College Training

INTRODUCTION: Shell and tube heat exchangers are one of the most common equipment found in all plants. How it works?

S.E. (Chemical) (Second Semester) EXAMINATION, 2011 HEAT TRANSFER (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

Transcription:

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 1 of 12 Subject: Description: Guarantee power output of large collector fields Procedures to give power output guarantees for large collector fields and heat exchangers Procedures to check power output guarantees for large collector fields and heat exchangers. Date: 18 th March 2016 Authors: Download: Jan Erik Nielsen, PlanEnergi (jen@planenergi.dk); Daniel Trier, PlanEnergi (dt@planenergi.dk) http://task45.iea-shc.org/fact-sheets Contents Contents... 1 Intro... 1 Giving guarantees... 2 Give solar collector field guarantee... 2 Restrictions on operating conditions... 2 Example 1: Give a guarantee for a collector field performance... 3 Give guarantee for heat exchanger performance... 3 Example 2: Give a guarantee for a heat exchanger performance... 4 Checking performance guarantees... 6 Measurements needed for checking guarantees... 6 Valid data points... 7 Checking collector field performance guarantee... 7 Example 3: Checking collector field performance guarantee... 8 Checking heat exchanger performance guarantee... 9 Example 4: Checking heat exchanger temperature difference:... 10 Annex: Templates... 12 Template for the equipment used for data logging... 12 Template for the solar collector fluid properties... 12 Intro The performance guarantees described here relate to the power performance of a collector field and a heat exchanger under some restricted ( full load ) operating conditions. The procedures described here do not pretend to give and check a guarantee on the annual output of the system. For annual output guarantee, see IEA SHC Fact Sheet 45.A.3.2 Guaranteed annual output (http://task45.iea-shc.org/fact-sheets).

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 2 of 12 Giving guarantees The procedures for giving guarantee for the collector field power and heat exchanger performance are given below. Give solar collector field guarantee Guarantee for the collector field performance can be given in the form of a guarantee equation: where: P g = A c [η 0 G a 1 (T m T a) a 2 (T m T a) 2 ] f P f U f O (eq. 1) P g: Guaranteed performance (thermal power output) [W] A c: Collector area corresponding to the collector module efficiency parameters: η 0, a 1 and a 2 η 0: Optical efficiency [-] a 1: 1 st order heat loss coefficient [W/(K m²)] a 2: 2 nd order heat loss coefficient [W/(K² m²)] G: Solar irradiance on collector plane [W/m²] T a: Ambient air temperature [ C] The collector module efficiency parameters should be based on certified 1 test results. The mean collector fluid temperature is taken as simple average of in and outlet temperatures: where: T m = (T c,in + T c,out) / 2 (eq. 2) T m: Mean temperature of solar collector fluid [ C] T c,out: Hot side of collector field (= collector outlet temperature) [ C] T c,in: Cold side of collector field (= collector inlet temperature) [ C] f P: Safety factor taking into account heat losses from pipes etc. in the collector loop; if heat losses are estimate to be 3 %, f P is 0.97 f U: Safety factor taking into account measurement uncertainty; if the overall measurement uncertainty is estimated to be 5 %, f U is 0.95 f O: Safety factor for other uncertainties e.g. related to non-ideal conditions such as non-ideal flow distribution and unforeseen heat losses; if this uncertainty is considered insignificant, F O can be put close to 1. Restrictions on operating conditions It is important to give restriction on the operation conditions for which the guarantee is valid. The recommended restrictions for valid data points are: G 800 W/m² No shadows on collectors 1 E.g.: Solar Keymark or similar.

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 3 of 12 No snow/ice/condensation on solar radiation sensors - i.e. T a 5 C No sudden change ( 5 K) in collector mean operating temperature level during an hour Example 1: Give a guarantee for a collector field performance Collector data (from e.g. Solar Keymark data sheet): Collector field area: Module area: 13.2 m² Number of collector modules: 1000 A C = 13 200 m² Corresponding collector efficiency parameters η 0 = 0.80 a 1 = 3.0 W/(K m²) a 2 = 0.01 W/(K² m²) Other data: Estimated pipe heat losses: 3 % f P = 0.97 Estimated uncertainty on measurements: 10 % f U = 0.90 Safety factor other things: f O = 0.95 Guarantee equation 1 with the values inserted is then: P g = 13 200 [0.80 G 3.0 (T m T a) 0.01 (T m T a)²] 0.97 0.90 0.95 [W] = 10 947 [0.80 G 3.0 (T m T a) 0.01 (T m T a)²] [W] Give guarantee for heat exchanger performance The performance guarantee for the heat exchanger ( hx ) in the solar collector loop can be given as a maximum logarithmic 2 mean temperature difference between the primary ( prim ) and secondary ( sec ) side of the heat exchanger: ΔT g,hx = guaranteed value [K] for a given set of minimum ( min ) requirements on in- and outlet temperatures on primary side: T prim,in,min given value 1 (e.g. 80 C) [ C] T prim,out,min given value 2 (e.g. 40 C) [ C] It is recommended to set these minimum temperature values 10 K below the typical full load situation in order to be sure to have valid data points for checking the guaranty, i.e. T prim,in,min = T prim,in,full 10 K 2 If the capacity rates on both sides of the heat exchanger are approx. equal (they should be!), then the logarithmic mean temperature difference is approx. equal to the arithmetic mean. If the capacity flows are significantly different then it should be calculated as T mean = T 1 T 2 ln( T [K] where ΔT1 = Tprim,in Tsec,out [K] and ΔT2 = Tprim,out Tsec,in [K]. 1 T2 )

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 4 of 12 T prim,out,min = T prim,out,full 10 K Power value: The guarantee should be given for a certain value of the power transferred through the heat exchanger; a natural choice would be the power corresponding to a typical full load situation, e.g.: P hx = P g [W] with G: chosen to 900 [W/m²] T m: chosen to be the mean collector temperature at full load 3 T a: chosen to 15 C. It is recommended to include some safety margin on ΔT g,hx e.g. 0.5 K. It is important to specify the fluid (brand name, type name, glycol percentage) and to give maximum allowed tolerance on the capacity flows (w) on primary and secondary side of the heat exchanger (e.g. 0.95 w prim / w sec 1.05). Example 2: Give a guarantee for a heat exchanger performance The typical full load situation is defined as: T prim,in,full = 90 [ C] T prim,in,min = 80 (10 K lower as recommended) [ C] T prim,out,full = 50 [ C] T prim,out,min = 40 (10 K lower as recommended) [ C] T a = 15 [ C] T m T a = (90 + 50) / 2 15 = 55 [K] G = 900 [W/m²] P hx = P g [W] 0.95 w prim / w sec 1.05 Assuming same collector field as before: P g = 10 947 [0.8 900 3.0 55 0.01 55²] [W] = 10 947 525 [W] = 5.75 [MW] Choosing a heat exchanger specified (with the actual glycol mixture) to a) transfer 5.75 MW at primary side b) run with temperatures in and out of primary side at 80 C and 40 C respectively c) have a mean temperature difference across the heat exchanger of 3 K 3 If the temperature decrease between Tc,out and Thx,prim,in is negligible, these values can be assumed equal here. The same thing accounts for Thx,prim,out and Tc,in. Equation 2 can then be used to determine Tm. These assumptions depend on the physical distance between the measurement points, i.e. whether or not they are placed close to each other.

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 5 of 12 it should then be safe 4 to give a guarantee of: ΔT g,hx = 3.5 [K] (including a safety interval of 0.5 K). The guarantee could look like the following text box: The logarithmic mean temperature difference across the heat exchanger (from primary side to secondary side) is maximum 3.5 K under the following conditions: Fluid: Primary side: Tyforop Chemie GmbH type Tyfocor HTL, 30 % wt; secondary side: water Power transferred = 5.75 MW Temperatures: Primary side: Inlet temperature 80 ; outlet temperature 40 C Tolerance on the capacity flows on primary and secondary side of the heat exchanger: 0.95 w prim / w sec 1.05) For the example given (example no. 2) the influence of the heat exchanger ΔT on the instant performance is seen in fig.1. The figure shows the reduction in collector performance for the collector described in example no. 1, running at the given full load situation. It is seen that the reduction in performance in this case approximately equals the ΔT. 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Reduction in output due to heat exchanger ΔT 0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 Temperature difference from primary to secondary side in heat exchanger (example) [K] Figure 1. Example of the influence of the heat exchanger on the performance of the solar system. The higher the temperature difference across the heat exchanger (ΔT) the higher the temperature in the collector loop - and the lower the collector performance. The influence of the heat exchanger depends on the heat loss coefficient of the solar collector: The higher the collector heat loss coefficient - the larger the influence of the heat exchanger. (Source: PlanEnergi) 4 Note: It might be wise to have the provider/manufacturer of the heat exchanger involved in this guarantee.

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 6 of 12 Checking performance guarantees In the following procedures are given to check the guarantees described above. Measurements needed for checking guarantees To check the solar collector field performance guarantee, it is necessary (at least) to measure the following data points (see figure 2 below): T c,out: Outlet temperature from collector field (measured at heat exchanger inlet) [ C] T c,in: Inlet temperature to collector field (measured at heat exchanger outlet) [ C] P hx: Thermal power supplied to (or from) heat exchanger [W] G: Solar irradiance on collector plane [W/m²] T a: Ambient air temperature (shadowed and ventilated) [ C] To check also the guarantee on the heat exchanger the following additional points shall be measured: w prim Capacity flow in collector loop primary side (glycol mixture side) [W/K] T hx,sec,out Outlet temperature from heat exchanger secondary side (water side) [ C] T hx,sec,in Inlet temperature to heat exchanger secondary side (water side) [ C] w sec Capacity flow in heat exchanger secondary side (water side) [W/K] Requirements: Logging time 2 minutes Recording time = 1 hour Time and date for all recorded data are needed. The values in the record shall represent the average values over the last hour (e.g. data in the record saved 2011-04-31 12:00 represent the average values in the hour from 11:00 to 12:00 on April 31 st 2011). Time indication shall always be standard time (not daylight saving time or summer time ). Fig. 2. Schematic drawing showing the measurement points. T c,out = T prim,in and T Cc,in = T prim,out. (Source: PlanEnergi)

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 7 of 12 Referring to figure 2 the heat exchanger power is calculated either for the primary or the secondary side, e.g. for the primary side as: P hx = V prim ρ prim c p (T prim,in T prim,out) (eq. 3) where P hx: Thermal power supplied to (or from) heat exchanger [W] V prim Flow rate in primary loop [m 3 /s] 5 ρ prim Density of the collector fluid [kg/m 3 ] c p Heat capacity of solar collector fluid [J/(kg K)] T prim,in Inlet temperature on the primary side of the heat exchanger [ C] T prim,out Outlet temperature on the primary side of the heat exchanger [ C] The calculation is the same for the secondary side except for the fact that the inlet and outlet temperatures are switched in the formula. Valid data points Only data points (hourly average values) fulfilling the following requirements are valid: G 800 W/m² T a 5 C No snow or ice or condensing on/in collectors and solar radiation sensor No shadows on any collector in the field Incidence angle of direct solar radiation 30 For checking the collector performance, the measuring period shall have at least 20 data records. All valid data records in the period shall be used unless it is obvious that errors in data or very atypical operating conditions occur (omitting valid data points shall be reported and justified). Checking collector field performance guarantee The summarized measured ( meas ) energy output for all valid data point are compared with the corresponding energy calculated according to the guarantee formula (eq.1), using the measured weather data and temperatures in collector loop. If this measured energy is equal to or greater than the energy corresponding to the guarantee calculation, then the guarantee is fulfilled: Q hx,meas Q g => Guarantee OK Each Q hx,meas and Q g is calculated as P hx,meas and P g multiplied by time (3600 s) respectively [J]. Plot of corresponding data points for measured and calculated thermal power should be made to check for deviations. See example below in figure 4. 5 Normally measured in m 3 /h and converted to m 3 /s by multiplying with 3600 s/h.

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 8 of 12 Example 3: Checking collector field performance guarantee Data points from a performance check of a Danish system are used to illustrate the checking and plotting. 28 valid data points were recorded. Summing up hourly measured energy output and comparing with the sum of guaranteed energy output shows that Q hx,meas Q g. Guarantee is then OK. 105% Measured & guaranteed energy output 100% 95% Q hx,meas Q g Fig.3. Plot of summarized measured energy and corresponding guaranteed energy. (Source: PlanEnergi) Plotting the measured data points against the corresponding guaranteed ones shows that the variation of the data points looks reasonable - see fig. 4. Though there are points both above and below the red guarantee line the sum of measurements in figure 3 shows that the guarantee indeed is fulfilled.

Measured output (MWh) Task 45 Large Systems Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 9 of 12 5500 Measured versus garanteed ouput 5000 4500 4000 4000 4500 5000 5500 Guaranteed output (MWh) Fig.4. Plot of measured hourly energy against corresponding guaranteed hourly points. (Source: PlanEnergi). Checking heat exchanger performance guarantee The performance guarantee of the heat exchanger can be checked by plotting the measured logarithmic mean temperature difference across the heat exchanger against the transferred thermal power. A linear regression based on these measurements has the expression f(p hx,meas) = c 1 P hx,meas + c 2 (eq. 4) where f(p hx,meas) = ΔT hx,meas [K] c 1 and c 2 are constants determined by the linear regression. When the power for which the guarantee was made (P g) is inserted in equation 4, it is revealed whether or not the temperature difference is too large since the calculated value ΔT check = f(p g) = c 1 P g + c 2 [K] must be lower than or equal to the guaranteed maximum temperature difference ΔT g,hx. Hence the guarantee is fulfilled if ΔT check = f(p g) ΔT g,hx It shall be documented that the temperature and capacity flow requirements are fulfilled. The example below illustrates this checking.

ΔT hx,meas [K] Task 45 Large Systems Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 10 of 12 Example 4: Checking heat exchanger temperature difference: The guarantee: The temperature difference across the heat exchanger is maximum 5 K under the following conditions: Fluid: Primary side: <fluid specification>; secondary side: water Power transferred = 4.5 MW Temperatures: Primary side: Inlet temperature 80 ; outlet temperature 40 C Tolerance on the capacity flows on primary and secondary side of the heat exchanger: 0.95 w prim / w sec 1.05) The plot in figure 5 shows measured temperature difference points ΔT hx,meas a linear regression based on the measurement points the guaranteed maximum temperature difference ΔT g,hx (in this case 5 K) for the given heat exchanger power P g for which the guarantee is given (in this case 4.5 MW): 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 Fig.5. Logarithmic mean temperature difference across heat exchanger as function of the transferred power. Guarantee point indicated with red square at 4.5 MW; 5 K. It is seen that in this case the guarantee is NOT fulfilled! (Source: PlanEnergi) Check of temperatures: ΔT hx,meas as function of P hx 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 P hx [MW] f(p hx ) = 0.629 P hx + 2.5 R 2 = 0.899 ΔT hx,meas ΔT g,hx

Flow rate ratio [-] Temperature [ C] Task 45 Large Systems Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 11 of 12 100 90 Temperatures at heat exchanger primary side 80 70 60 50 40 T hx,prim,out T hx,prim,in Linear () T hx,prim,out,min Linear () 30 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Data point no. Fig.6. Temperature requirements fulfilled since T hx,prim,out is above T hx,prim,out,min (40 C) and T hx,prim,in is above Checking thermal capacity flow rate ratio: 1.10 Thermal capacity flow ratio 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Data point no. Fig.7. Capacity flow rate ratio requirement fulfilled since the measurement points are between 0.95 and 1.05 as required. (Source: PlanEnergi) It is seen that the requirements given in the heat exchanger performance guarantee is fulfilled (as seen in figure 6 and 7) BUT the guarantee is in this case NOT fulfilled (as seen in figure 5). Only if the red, square marker in figure 5 is above the regression line the guarantee is fulfilled - and this is not the case here. In the next page is seen a template which can be used to check that all necessary component details are noted as well as the collector fluid properties.

Guaranteed power output IEA SHC TECH SHEETS 45.A.3.1, page 12 of 12 Annex: Templates Template for the equipment used for data logging Equipment type Name of manufacturer and component Placement and orientation Measurement range Solar radiation sensor [W/m 2 ] Flowmeter 1 [m 3 /h] Uncertainty +/- [%] Flowmeter 2 [m 3 /h] Temperature sensors Table A.1. Properties of the equipment used for measuring the collector and heat exchanger efficiency. [ C] Template for the solar collector fluid properties Name of manufacturer [-] Product name [-] Concentration [wt %] Heat capacity (40 C) Heat capacity (80 C) [J/(kg K)] [J/(kg K)] Density (40 C) [kg/m 3 ] Density (80 C) [kg/m 3 ] Table A.2. Solar collector fluid properties of the fluid used in the tests.