arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 24 Feb 2018

Similar documents
Characteristic subspaces and hyperinvariant frames

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

ON TYPES OF MATRICES AND CENTRALIZERS OF MATRICES AND PERMUTATIONS

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 19 Oct 2013

QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10.

JORDAN AND RATIONAL CANONICAL FORMS

BESSEL MATRIX DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS: EXPLICIT SOLUTIONS OF INITIAL AND TWO-POINT BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35

Structure of rings. Chapter Algebras

A proof of the Jordan normal form theorem

NONCOMMUTATIVE POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS. Edward S. Letzter. Introduction

CANONICAL FORMS FOR LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS AND MATRICES. D. Katz

ON ABELIAN SUBALGEBRAS AND IDEALS OF MAXIMAL DIMENSION IN SUPERSOLVABLE LIE ALGEBRAS

The final publication is available at

A note on the Jordan decomposition

THE JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOMPOSITION

Q N id β. 2. Let I and J be ideals in a commutative ring A. Give a simple description of

Math 113 Homework 5. Bowei Liu, Chao Li. Fall 2013

On finite semifelds of prime degree. equivalence classifcation of subspaces of invertible matrices

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Hessenberg Pairs of Linear Transformations

Math Introduction to Modern Algebra

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 3 Feb 2019

August 2015 Qualifying Examination Solutions

On the solvability of groups with four class sizes.

Moore Penrose inverses and commuting elements of C -algebras

How many units can a commutative ring have?

Fundamental theorem of modules over a PID and applications

Linear Algebra M1 - FIB. Contents: 5. Matrices, systems of linear equations and determinants 6. Vector space 7. Linear maps 8.

Direction: You are required to complete this test by Monday (April 24, 2006). In order to

Generalized core inverses of matrices

Linear and Cyclic Codes over direct product of Finite Chain Rings

MATHEMATICS 217: HONORS LINEAR ALGEBRA Spring Term, First Week, February 4 8

A connection between number theory and linear algebra

A classification of sharp tridiagonal pairs. Tatsuro Ito, Kazumasa Nomura, Paul Terwilliger

Section VI.33. Finite Fields

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 Feb 2015

Some remarks on Leibniz algebras whose semisimple part related with $sl_2$

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 7 Oct 2014

PERFECT POLYNOMIALS OVER F p WITH p + 1 IRREDUCIBLE DIVISORS. 1. Introduction. Let p be a prime number. For a monic polynomial A F p [x] let d

Notes on the matrix exponential

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

Leibniz Algebras Associated to Extensions of sl 2

A new parallel polynomial division by a separable polynomial via hermite interpolation with applications, pp

The Jordan-Postnikov Normal Form of a Real Linear Operator

Math 4310 Solutions to homework 7 Due 10/27/16

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 Nov 2018

MINIMAL POLYNOMIALS AND CHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIALS OVER RINGS

On Representability of a Finite Local Ring

Generalized eigenspaces

HIGHER CLASS GROUPS OF GENERALIZED EICHLER ORDERS

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

Commuting nilpotent matrices and pairs of partitions

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups

Algebra Exam Syllabus

IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS

Moreover this binary operation satisfies the following properties

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

Integral Similarity and Commutators of Integral Matrices Thomas J. Laffey and Robert Reams (University College Dublin, Ireland) Abstract

Extension fields II. Sergei Silvestrov. Spring term 2011, Lecture 13

List of topics for the preliminary exam in algebra

Check Character Systems Using Chevalley Groups

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Eigenvalues of Random Matrices over Finite Fields

MIT Algebraic techniques and semidefinite optimization February 16, Lecture 4

Lacunary Polynomials over Finite Fields Course notes

FORMAL TAYLOR SERIES AND COMPLEMENTARY INVARIANT SUBSPACES

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

Problem 4 (Wed Jan 29) Let G be a finite abelian group. Prove that the following are equivalent

Definition (T -invariant subspace) Example. Example

HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES AND PARABOLIC VECTOR BUNDLES ON A SYMMETRIC PRODUCT

Lecture 20 FUNDAMENTAL Theorem of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups (FTFGAG)

On a theorem of Ziv Ran

THE MODULI OF SUBALGEBRAS OF THE FULL MATRIX RING OF DEGREE 3

A SURPRISING FACT ABOUT D-MODULES IN CHARACTERISTIC p > Introduction

Contents. 1. Introduction

22M: 121 Final Exam. Answer any three in this section. Each question is worth 10 points.

C-Characteristically Simple Groups

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA MAT6608. References

A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF RINGS VIA AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS

STABILITY OF INVARIANT SUBSPACES OF COMMUTING MATRICES We obtain some further results for pairs of commuting matrices. We show that a pair of commutin

REAL AND COMPLEX HOMOGENEOUS POLYNOMIAL ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS IN n-space AND m-ary REAL AND COMPLEX NON-ASSOCIATIVE ALGEBRAS IN n-space

Simplicity of P SL n (F ) for n > 2

Fields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.

0.1 Rational Canonical Forms

Graphs and Classes of Finite Groups

Further linear algebra. Chapter II. Polynomials.

The only global contact transformations of order two or more are point transformations

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 15 Dec 2015

5 Dedekind extensions

Block companion matrices, discrete-time block diagonal stability and polynomial matrices

(Can) Canonical Forms Math 683L (Summer 2003) M n (F) C((x λ) ) =

Math 120 HW 9 Solutions

Transcription:

THE LATTICE OF CHARACTERISTIC SUBSPACES OF AN ENDOMORPHISM WITH JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOMPOSITION DAVID MINGUEZA, M EULÀLIA MONTORO, AND ALICIA ROCA arxiv:180208832v1 [mathra] 24 Feb 2018 Abstract Given an endomorphism A over a finite dimensional vector space having Jordan-Chevalley decomposition, the lattices of invariant and hyperinvariant subspaces of A can be obtained from the nilpotent part of this decomposition We extend this result for lattices of characteristic subspaces We also obtain a generalization of Shoda s Theorem about the characterization of the existence of characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces 1 Introduction The lattice of characteristic subspaces of an endomorphism over a finite dimensional space has been studied in[1, 2, 7, 8], where structural properties of the lattice have been given when the minimal polynomial of the endomorphism splits over the underlying field F It was proved in ([1]) that only if F = GF(2), the lattices of characteristic and hyperinvariant subspaces may not coincide When the minimal polynomial of the endomorphism does not split over F, the lattice of characteristic subspaces has not been described The aim of this paper is to analyze this case when the minimal polynomial of the endomorphism is separable The results are based on the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of an endomorphism which exists if the minimal polynomial of the endomorphism is separable (see [5]) In particular, on perfect fields every irreducible polynomial is separable, therefore the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition holds The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we introduce some definitions and previous results We present some lemmas showing that the study the lattices of the invariant and hyperinvariant subspaces of an endomorphism can be reduced to the case of an endomorphism where the minimal polynomial is a power of an irreducible polynomial p In Section 3, out of the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of an endomorphism into its commuting semisimple and nilpotent parts, we reduce the problem to the study of the lattice of characteristic subspaces of the associated nilpotent part Finally, we conclude that characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces can only appear when the irreducible factor of the Date: February 27, 2018 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 06F20, 06D50, 15A03, 15A27 Key words and phrases Hyperinvariant subspaces, characteristic subspaces, lattices Montoro is supported by the Spanish MINECO/FEDER research project MTM 2015-65361-P, Roca is supported by grant MTM2017-83624-P MINECO 1

2 DAVID MINGUEZA, M EULÀLIA MONTORO, AND ALICIA ROCA minimal polynomial is of degree 1, in other words, if p splits over F This result extends Shoda s theorem (Theorema 29) for the separable case 2 Preliminaries We introduce some definitions and previous results which will be used throughout the paper Let F be a field Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over F and f : V V an endomorphism We denote by A M n (F) its associated matrix with respect to given basis and by m A the minimal polynomial of A In what follows we will identify f with A The degree of a polynomial p is written as deg(p), and is the cardinality of The lattice of the vector subspaces of V will be denoted by L F (V) A subspace Y V is invariant with respect to A if AY Y We denote by Inv F (A) the lattice of invariant subspaces The centralizer of A over F is the algebra Z F (A) = {B M n (F) : AB = BA} If we only take those endomorphisms B that are automorphisms we write Z F (A) = {B M n(f) : AB = BA, det(b) 0} A subspace Y V is called hyperinvariant with respect to A if BY Y for all matrices B Z F (A) We denote by Hinv F (A) the lattice of hyperinvariant subspaces An invariant subspace Y V with respect to A is called characteristic if BY Y for all matrices B Z F (A) and AY Y We denote by Chinv F(A) the lattice of characteristic subspaces Obviously, Hinv F (A) Chinv F (A) Inv F (A) The lattices of invariant and hyperinvariant subspaces allow the following decompositions Proposition 21 [3] Let A and B be endomorphisms on finite dimensional vector spaces V and W respectively, over a field F The following properties are equivalent: (1) The minimum polynomials of A and B are relatively prime (2) Inv F (A B) = Inv F (A) Inv F (B) Proposition 22 [4] Let A and B be endomorphisms on finite dimensional vector spaces V and W respectively, over a field F The following properties are equivalent: (1) The minimum polynomials of A and B are relatively prime (2) Hinv F (A B) = Hinv F (A) Hinv F (B) As a consequence, if m A = p k 1 1 pkr r is the prime decomposition of m A for a given A M n (F), taking into account the primary decomposition V = V 1 V r, V i = ker(p i (A) k i ), i = 1,,r, and A i = A V i, i = 1,r, the next result is satisfied (see [3, 4]) Proposition 23 Let A M n (F) and m A = p k 1 1 pkr r with p 1,,p r distinct irreducible polynomials Then, (1) Inv F (A) = Inv F (A 1 ) Inv F (A r )

THE LATTICE OF CHARACTERISTIC SUBSPACES OF AN ENDOMORPHISM WITH JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOM (2) Hinv F (A) = Hinv F (A 1 ) Hinv F (A r ) If p(x) F[x] is an irreducible polynomial and α / F is a root of p(x), we denoteby F(α) theminimal extension offcontaining α Thenextresultcan be found in [3] Although a proof of the following property 4 was included in [3], we give here a simple proof of the whole lemma Lemma 24 [3] Let A M n (F) Assume that m A = p 0 + p 1 x + + p s x s F[x] is irreducible, and that α is a root of p such that α / F Let K = {a 0 I n +a 1 A++a s 1 A s 1 a i F} be the algebra of polynomials of degree at most s Then, (1) K is a field isomorphic to F(α) (2) V is a K vector space (3) A is K linear (4) Inv F (A) = L K (V) Proof (1) The following application Γ : K F(α), with Γ(a 0 I n +a 1 A+a s 1 A s 1 ) = a 0 +a 1 α++a s 1 α s 1 is an isomorphism (2) For all λ = a 0 I n +a 1 A++a s 1 A s 1 K, it is satisfied that λv = (a 0 I n +a 1 A++a s 1 A s 1 )v V, v V (3) For all λ K, Aλv = λav (4) The following equivalences hold, W Inv F (A) AW W λw W, λ K W L K (V) Notice that properties 1 4 of this lemma are trivially true if s = 1 A polynomial is called p-primary if it is of theform p r for someirreducible polynomial p and a positive integer r A polynomial is called separable if it is coprime with its derivate ([6]) A linear operator S on a finite-dimensional vector space is semisimple if every S-invariant subspace has a complementary S-invariant subspace A linear operator N on a finite-dimensional vector space is nilpotent if N k = 0 for some positive integer k The next lemma contains the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of a matrix, which plays a key role in this work The result can be found in [5] Lemma 25 (Jordan-Chevalley decomposition) Let A M n (F) be a matrix with m A = p r, where p is irreducible and separable Then, there is a unique decomposition A = S +N, where S is semisimple, N is nilpotent and SN = NS Moreover, S and N are polynomials in A

4 DAVID MINGUEZA, M EULÀLIA MONTORO, AND ALICIA ROCA Remark 26 [3] If A has Jordan-Chevalley decomposition then there exist a transformation into a rational canonical form such that A is similar to: with diag(c 1,C 2,,C m ), C 0 0 0 I s C 0 0 C i = M ni (F), i = 1,2,,m, 0 0 C 0 0 0 I s C where C is the companion matrix of p, and n 1 n 2 n m > 0, n 1 ++n m = n, n 1 = sr (where s = deg(p)), then C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 I s 0 0 0 S =, N = 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 I s 0 Taking advantage of the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition it can be proved that the lattices of the invariant and hyperinvariant subspaces of A over F can be obtained as lattices of the corresponding subspaces of a nilpotent matrix over a different field K (see [3] and [4], respectively) The results are included in the next theorem Although proofs are sketched in [3, 4], we provided them in detail Theorem 27 Let A M n (F) Assume that m A is p primary (m A = p r ) with p separable and deg(p) = s Let A = S + N be the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of A Let K = {a 0 I n +a 1 S ++a s 1 S s 1 a i F} Then, Proof (1) Inv F (A) = Inv K (A) = Inv K (N) (2) Hinv F (A) = Hinv K (A) = Hinv K (N) (1) W Inv F (A) W Inv K (A) (because A is K linear) Moreover, since S K (2) Notice that and Therefore Inv K (A) = Inv K (A S) = Inv K (N) Z K (A) = Z F (A) Z F (S) = Z F (A), Z K (A) = Z K (A S) = Z K (N) Hinv F (A) = Hinv K (A) = Hinv K (A S) = Hinv K (N) Next example illustrates the above lemma for the field of real numbers

THE LATTICE OF CHARACTERISTIC SUBSPACES OF AN ENDOMORPHISM WITH JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOM Example 28 Let F = R, V = R 4 and A = 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 The minimal polynomial of A is m A = (x 2 + 1) 2 The Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of A is given by 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S = 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1, N = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0, 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 and K = {a 0 I 4 +a 1 S, a i R} Notice that the Jordan chains of N are e 1 e 3 0, Then, e 2 e 4 0 Inv R (A) = Inv K (N) = {0, e 3,e 4,V} The lattice of hyperinvariant subspaces is Hinv R (A) = Hinv K (N) = {0, e 3,e 4,V} Concerning to characteristic subspaces, Shoda s theorem characterizes the existence of characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces Theorem 29 [9] Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field F = GF(2) and let f : V V be a nilpotent linear operator The following statements are equivalent: (1) There exists a characteristic subspace of V which is not hyperinvariant (2) For some numbers r and s with s > r + 1 the Jordan form of f contains exactly one Jordan block of size s and exactly one block of size r Astuti-Wimmer proved ([1]) that characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces can only exist on the field GF(2) Theorem 210 [1] Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over a field F and let f : V V be a linear operator Assume that the minimal polynomial of f splits over F If F > 2, then Chinv F (f) = Hinv F (f)

6 DAVID MINGUEZA, M EULÀLIA MONTORO, AND ALICIA ROCA 3 Reduction to the nilpotent case for characteristic subspaces In this section we focus on the study of the lattice of characteristic subspaces of an endomorphism over a field when the irreducible factors of the minimal polynomial are separable Firstof all wesee that thegeneral casecan bereducedtotheespecificcase of endomorphisms having minimal polynomials with an unique irreducible factor, as in the lattices of invariant of hyperinvariant subspaces Lemma 31 Let A and B be endomorphisms on finite dimensional vector spaces V and W respectively, over a field F The following properties are equivalent: (1) The minimum polynomials of A and B are relatively prime (2) Chinv F (A B) = Chinv F (A) Chinv F (B) Proof First assume that (1) is true It is evident that Chinv(A B) Chinv(A) Chinv(B) holds even for an arbitrary polynomials As it is stated in [10], Z(A B) = Z(A) Z(B), therefore every commuting automorphism of A B is of the form X = ( ) X1 0 0 X 2 with X 1 Z (A) and X 2 Z (B) Taking W = W 1 W 2 Chinv(A) Chinv(B), clearly W Chinv(A B) follows Assume now that (2) is true As Chinv(A B) = Chinv(A) Chinv(B), it is satisfied that V 0 ( Chinv(A) B) Notice that if X is a matrix such that XA = BX, then I 0 Z X I (A B) Therefore, V 0 must be invariant for this matrix and this implies X = 0 If gcd(m A,m B ) = q, deg(q) > 0, then m A = qf and m B = qh for some polynomials f,h, andwlog we can supposegcd(q,f) ( ) = 1 With ( respect to ) Cq 0 Cq H an appropriate basis, we can write A = and B = 0 F 0 G where C q is the companion matrix ( of q ) and for some matrices F,H and G U 0 Let U Z (C q ), then X = 0 satisfies XA = BX, which is 0 0 clearly a contradiction Corollary 32 Let A M n (F) and m A = p k 1 1 pkr r with p i distinct irreducible polynomials Then, (1) Chinv(A) = Chinv(A 1 ) Chinv(A r ), where A i M ni (F) is the restriction of A M n (F) to V i = ker((p i (A)) k i ), i = 1,2,,r, (V = V 1 V r ) In the next lemma we see that the lattice of characteristic subspaces of A can also be determined on a different field for a nilpotent matrix, using Jordan-Chevalley decomposition

THE LATTICE OF CHARACTERISTIC SUBSPACES OF AN ENDOMORPHISM WITH JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOM Lemma 33 Let A M n (F) Assume that m A is p primary (m A = p r ) with p separable and deg(p) = s Let A = S + N be the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of A Let K = {a 0 I n +a 1 S ++a s 1 S s 1 a i F} Then, (1) Chinv F (A) = Chinv K (A) = Chinv K (N) Proof Similarly to the proof of Theorem 27, Z K (A) = Z F (A) Z F (S) = Z F (A), and Z K (A) = Z K (A S) = Z K (N) Therefore Chinv F (A) = Chinv K (A) = Chinv K (A S) = Chinv K (N) Finally we obtain the conclusion that characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces can only exist over Jordan blocks Theorem 34 Let A be an endomorphism on a finite dimensional space V over a field F Assume that m A is p primary (m A = p r ) with p separable If Chinv F (A)\Hinv F (A) { }, then deg(p) = 1 and F = GF(2) Proof Let us assume that Chinv F (A)\Hinv F (A) { } and deg(p) > 1 As p is separable, let A = N + S be the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of A By Lemma 33 we know that Chinv F (A) = Chinv K (N) with K defined as in Lemma 33 By assumption deg(p) > 1, which implies that K > 2, and by [1, Theorem 34], Chinv K (N) = Hinv K (N) Finally, by Theorem 27, Hinv K (N) = Hinv F (A) Therefore, Chinv F (A) = Hinv F (A), which is a contradiction We see that for the existence of characteristic non-hyperinvariant subspaces it is necessary that deg(p) = 1 and F = GF(2) If we take into account the Shoda condition, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition Corollary 35 Let A be an endomorphism on a finite dimensional space V over a field F Assume that m A is p primary (m A = p r ) with p separable Then, the next two statement are equivalent: (1) Chinv F (A)\Hinv F (A) { } (2) F = GF(2), deg(p) = 1 and the Shoda condition is satisfied We show next how the lattice of characteristic subspaces can be obtained in two examples In the first one Hinv F (A) = Chinv F (A), and in the second one Chinv F (A) Hinv F (A) for some matrices A

8 DAVID MINGUEZA, M EULÀLIA MONTORO, AND ALICIA ROCA Example 36 Let F = GF(2) and 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 A = 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Theminimal polynomial of A is p-primary, m A = (x 2 +x+1) 3, p = x 2 +x+1 separable, and the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of A is 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S = 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0, N = 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Let K = {a 0 I 8 +a 1 S, a i GF(2)} The Segre characteristic of N is (3,3,1,1) with Jordan chains e 1 e 3 e 5 0 e 2 e 4 e 6 0 e 7 0 e 8 0 The characteristic and hyperinvariant subspaces of N are (see [7]): Hinv K (N) = Chinv K (N) = {0, e 3,e 5,e 4,e 6,e 7,e 8, e 3,e 5,e 4,e 6, e 5,e 6,e 7,e 8, e 5,e 6,V} Example 37 Let F = GF(2) and A = 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 The minimal polynomial of A is m A = (x + 1) 3, p = x + 1 trivially splits over F and 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S = 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0, N = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Observe that K = F = GF(2) as deg(p) = 1 The Segre characteristic of N is (3,1) with vector chains: e 1 e 2 e 3 0 e 4 0

THE LATTICE OF CHARACTERISTIC SUBSPACES OF AN ENDOMORPHISM WITH JORDAN-CHEVALLEY DECOM The hyperinvariant and characteristic non hyperinvariant subspaces, according to [7], are: Hinv K (N) = {0, e 2,e 3,e 4, e 2,e 3, e 3,e 4, e 3,V}, Chinv K (N)\Hinv K (N) = {e 2 +e 4 + e 3 } Acknowledgments The second author is partially supported by grant MTM2015-65361-P MINECO/FEDER, UE The third author is partially supported by grant MTM2017-83624-P MINECO References [1] P Astuti, HK Wimmer Hyperinvariant, characteristic and marked subspaces Oper Matrices 3, (2009) 261-270 [2] P Astuti, HK Wimmer Characteristic and hyperinvariant subspaces over the field GF(2) Linear Algebra Appl 438, 4, (2013), 1551-1563 [3] L Brickman, PA Fillmore The invariant subspace lattice of a linear transformation Can J Math, 19, 35, (1967), 810-822 [4] PA Fillmore, DA Herrero and WE Longstaff The hyperinvariant subspace lattice of a linear transformation Linear Algebra Appl 17 (1977), 125-132 [5] KHoffman and R Kunze Linear Algebra Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1971 [6] S Lang Algebra, Vol I, Princeton, NJ, 1953 [7] D Mingueza, ME Montoro, JR Pacha Description of the characteristic nonhyperinvariant subspaces over the field GF(2) Linear Algebra Appl 439 (2013), 3734-3745 [8] D Mingueza, ME Montoro, A Roca The characteristic subspace lattice of a linear transformation Linear Algebra Appl 506 (2016) 329-341 [9] K Shoda Über die characteristischen Untergruppen einer endlichen Abelschen Gruppe Math Z 31 (1930) 611 624 [10] D A Suprunenko,R I Tyshkevich Commutative Matrices Academic Paperbacks, 1968 Accenture, Passeig Sant Gervasi 51-53, 08022 Barcelona, Spain E-mail address: davidmingueza@outlookes Departamento de Matemáticas e Informática Universitat de Barcelona,, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 585, 08007 Barcelona, Spain E-mail address: eulamontoro@ubedu Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, IMM, Universitat Politècnica de València,, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain E-mail address: aroca@matupves