Evaluation of Different Software Packages in Flow Modeling under Bridge Structures

Similar documents
Parts Manual. EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031

State of the Art Two- Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling Tools Model Benchmark Testing

ANSWER KEY. Page 1 Page 2 cake key pie boat glue cat sled pig fox sun dog fish zebra. Page 3. Page 7. Page 6

08257 ANSWER KEY. Page 1 Page 2 cake key pie boat glue cat sled pig fox sun dog fish zebra. Page 3. Page 7. Page 6

Oddn ENTRIES. Two New Buildings For County 4-H Fair

Defra / Environment Agency FCERM Joint Science Programme. SC030218/SR Afflux Estimation System. August 2007 HYDRAULIC REFERENCE

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

Rural Women Get Invitations For Conference. Playground Opens With Enthusiasm

D. MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND SIMULATION

R a. Aeolian Church. A O g C. Air, Storm, Wind. P a h. Affinity: Clan Law. r q V a b a. R 5 Z t 6. c g M b. Atroxic Church. d / X.

Chair Susan Pilkington called the meeting to order.

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

FP101 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN FIRE PROTECTION SYMBOL LEGEND FIRE PROTECTION CODES & STANDARDS FIRE PROTECTION ABBREVIATIONS

* Ho h h (3) D where H o is the water depth of undisturbed flow, D is the thickness of the bridge deck, and h is the distance from the channel floor t

Prediction of bed form height in straight and meandering compound channels

Applying GIS to Hydraulic Analysis

Marine Harvest Herald

Conveyance Estimation System (CES) Launch

OVER 150 J-HOP To Q JCATS S(MJ) BY NOON TUESDAY CO-ED S LEAGUE HOLDS MEETING

Networking Management system Protocol. User s Manual

via via CCTA File /6 Train Avenue West and 70 Yonge Street South, Springwater Natural Hazard Study

`G 12 */" T A5&2/, ]&>b ; A%/=W, 62 S 35&.1?& S + ( A; 2 ]/0 ; 5 ; L) ( >>S.

Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones. Topics of Discussion. What is a Zone A Floodplain?

Accounting for increased flow resistance due to lateral momentum loss in restoration designs using 2-stage channels

:,,.. ;,..,.,. 90 :.. :, , «-»,, -. : -,,, -, -., ,, -, -. - «-»:,,, ,.,.

Please turn in form and check to the office by Monday, December 11 th. Amazon.com. HomeGoods. American Express. Lowe s. American Girl. Macy s.

Evaluation of tsunami force on concrete girder by experiment simulating steady flow

Grand Bapids Business Directory.

Whitney Grummon. She kick started a fire in my soul Teaching me a tool to cleanse my mind That ll last a life time. That s how I will remember

Evaluation of Scour Depth around Bridge Piers with Various Geometrical Shapes

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

RESOURCE, SUPPORT, AND DEVELOPMENT, INC

1. Introduction. Keywords Compound channel, Momentum transfer, Relative roughness, Relative depth, Relative width

Texas A & M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory Model Description Form

Analysis of flow around impermeable groynes on one side of symmetrical compound channel: An experimental study

Experimental Study of Discharge Characteristics in a Compound Meandering River

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

Advanced Radiology Reporting and Analytics with rscriptor vrad results after 10 million radiology reports

Volume 6 Water Surface Profiles

FICH~:s lciithyo\l~~trio~es.

4- u 4-4 u 1 - u/ qu 2025 u HGG EO H 0 2 G RGM P xg h O 2006] 10 h h v u v h u u h u v v u z u k u qu h k h - h v u u x x M) k v Pu vv v h P) h k u u

Muhammad Rezaul Haider (A ). Date of Submission: Course No.: CEE 6440, Fall 2016.

MEANDERING EFFECT FOR EVALUATION OF ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS IN OPEN CHANNEL FLOW

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9

2 xg v Z u R u B pg x g Z v M 10 u Mu p uu Kg ugg k u g B M p gz N M u u v v p u R! k PEKER S : vg pk H g E u g p Muu O R B u H H v Yu u Bu x u B v RO

HVAC LEGEND F.D. M.D. S.R. L.S.R. D.G. MECHANICAL COMPONENT IMPORTANCE FACTOR (Ip) DESIGNATION X Y

PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE 1/32"=1'-0"

Examination of Direct Discharge Measurement Data and Historic Daily Data for Selected Gages on the Middle Mississippi River,

,. *â â > V>V. â ND * 828.

BACKWATERRISE DUE TO FLOW CONSTRICTION BY BRIDGE PIERS

Klour Q» m i o r L l V I* , tr a d itim i rvpf tr.j UiC lin» tv'ilit* m in 's *** O.hi nf Iiir i * ii, B.lly Q t " '

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

13 Congruent Circles in a Circle

Sessom Creek Sand Bar Removal HCP Task 5.4.6

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

GUIDE. mirfieldshow.com. Sponsored by. Orange Design Studio.

APPENDIX B Hydraulic Considerations for Pipeline Crossings of Stream Channels

Solutionbank M1 Edexcel AS and A Level Modular Mathematics

4 8 N v btr 20, 20 th r l f ff nt f l t. r t pl n f r th n tr t n f h h v lr d b n r d t, rd n t h h th t b t f l rd n t f th rld ll b n tr t d n R th

PwC Middle East Spa Benchmarking Survey January - August 2012

Calibration of Manning s Friction Factor for Rivers in Iraq Using Hydraulic Model (Al-Kufa River as Case study)

-$! " #$%&! ' () * +,,,)* -./ ( 01! 6 %&! +,,.: - 1?* 'F! %&! '3*4 -$ ):7 +,,

THE EFFECT OF THICKNESS OF PILLAR IN THE CHANNEL BEND TO CHANGES THE COEFFICIENT OF SUPERELEVATION

Two-Dimensional Simulation of Truckee River Hydrodynamics

T e c h n i c u e. SOUTH'S LIVEST COLLEGE WEEKLY Georgia School of Technology. Phi Kappa Tau Frat Installed With WeekEnd of Activity mm

!"# $ % & '( INRA-RP-RE /71-0-Tir.1395

MEMORANDUM. Situation. David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA Ph Fx

U a C o & I & I b t - - -, _...

Below are the current active months, active strike prices, and their codes for WISDOM TREE DREYFUS BRAZILIAN R ETF

f;g,7k ;! / C+!< 8R+^1 ;0$ Z\ \ K S;4 i!;g + 5 ;* \ C! 1+M, /A+1+> 0 /A+>! 8 J 4! 9,7 )F C!.4 ;* )F /0 u+\ 30< #4 8 J C!

y 2 = 1 + y 1 This is known as the broad-crested weir which is characterized by:

Original. Public-Private Transportation Act Detailed Proposal ROUTE 28 PHASE III. Linton Hall Road to Pennsylvania Avenue Prince William Count y, VA

< < or a. * or c w u. "* \, w * r? ««m * * Z * < -4 * if # * « * W * <r? # *» */>* - 2r 2 * j j. # w O <» x <» V X * M <2 * * * *

SPACE TYPES & REQUIREMENTS

Z 9 (Seattle Displacement Coalition)

and ALTO SOLO C H, Rnnciman. Woman's Mistake f*" M>rqut4te\ ol ting about wilh a crutch 00 ac- Gr,,,,d Ri ''*' d5 L o,

RESOURCE, SUPPORT, AND DEVELOPMENT, INC

AS-SV ± 0.16 Ma Cumulative 39 Ar Released (%)

Vegetation effects on river hydraulics. Johannes J. (Joe) DeVries David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc. Sacramento, CA

Data, frameworks, and financial instrument identification

A combination of neural networks and hydrodynamic models for river flow prediction

Predictive criteria for the representation of primes by binary quadratic forms

>> Taste from our extensive collection. >> Meet the chefs and producers. >> Connect with our team to chat

TESA IP40 protection against dust (TLC) Connector for a forward thinking approach to your overall quality control system

HEC-RAS v5.0: 2-D applications

Discovery Guide. Beautiful, mysterious woman pursued by gunmen. Sounds like a spy story...

EQUATIONS FOR DISCHARGE CALCULATION IN COMPOUND CHANNELS HAVING HOMOGENEOUS ROUGHNESS * S. M. HOSSEINI **

Dam Break Analysis Using HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS A Case Study of Ajwa Reservoir

Express. Instruction Booklet. whole juicer JMB1000

For personal use only

Polyurethane Evolution

GNSS-Based Orbit Determination for Highly Elliptical Orbit Satellites

M $ 4 65\ K;$ 5, 65\ M $ C! 4 /2 K;$ M $ /+5\ 8$ A5 =+0,7 ;* C! 4.4/ =! K;$,7 $,+7; ;J zy U;K z< mj ]!.,,+7;

Ratios and Units of Measurement - Step-by-Step Lesson. Lesson 1 Ratio Problem: a) How many feet are there in 2 meters?

kind read i i i i i i

Analysis of the Cause for the Collapse of a Temporary Bridge Using Numerical Simulation

0# E % D 0 D - C AB

Determining the Suitable Sediment extraction Locations of Existing Sand and Gravel Mines on Boshar River in Iran using HEC-RAS Modeling

semi-annual Activities Fair, aimed at extra-cwrricular activities which the School

Transcription:

4*6 $ " $D )>2A " B*C )(=(@$1 )'2/ &35 &/( L!1' 2 (// QR4 /d/d G*) T)!MIKE11 54 /'# 4 G(%?,J # ( A# # /; ( 7;# F K u S E# 5#/ 7#%5. #<8> 5"# " D#P 7"#B4 <P ISIS ( HECRAS 4 7"#B4!> t (. 54 J# D#/;8n J#<n 5#nR 7/ hh J8, F " 5#/ # v*b %#nr#". 1(#/ D#P (!> % 7"#B4. #> # US BPR X > # 4[ U/; > 7n ( #% ( > G #" <P.O 8 (? ( ;# #%?, J " M# ^#/ (,O #" #" ( U D [ ( % N%.,O ;# 54 7O5" # # #%?,J T 54 B# ). V 0 #%?,J #. 1(#/ #<. T 54 2 ^#/ G! 7"#B4 4[ U/; ( 7#<8> " D#P #?,J D#R 7/R ( # (HECRAS v#m') ISIS ( HECRAS?,J (! > " D#P 7"#B4 <P U/; > " D#P 7"#B4 #.4 %#nr#". ^#/ # 7#" 8M#, 8 MIKE11 " M# ^#/ G # n?, J ( # ;# HECRAS " M# ^#/ N % w 2 E ^#/?, J %!4[. F? %#nr#". MIKE11 ISIS =9 '>5 : 36 517+ 89 : 5 ; < ; < : 36 :&6A).HECRAS Evaluation of Different Software Packages in Flow Modeling under Bridge Structures Mohammad Taghi Dastorani 1 (Received Sep. 7, 2005 Accepted Nov. 8, 2006) Abstract This study is an independent and a comparative research concerning the accuracy, capability and suitability of three wellknown packages of ISIS, MIKE11 and HECRAS as hydraulic river modeling software packages for modeling the flow through bridges. The research project was designed to assess the ability of each software package to model the flow through bridge structures. It was carried out using the data taken from experiments completed by a 22meter laboratory flume at the University of Birmingham. The flume has a compound cross section containing a main channel and two flood plains on either side. For this study a smooth main channel and a smooth floodplain have been assumed. Two types of bridges are modeled in this research; a multiple opening semicircular arch bridge and a single opening straight deck bridge. For each bridge, two different simulations were carried out using two different upstream boundaries as low flow and high flow simulations. According to the results, all three packages were able to model arch and US BPR bridges but in some cases they presented different results. The highest water elevation upstream the bridge (maximum afflux) was the main parameter to be compared to the measured values. ISIS and HECRAS (especially HECRAS) seem to be more efficient to model arch bridge. However, in some cases, MIKE 11 produced considerably higher results than those of the other two packages. To model USBPR bridge, all three packages produced reasonable results. However, the results by HECRAS are the best when the outputs are compared to the experimental data. Keywords: Flow Modeling, Under Bridge Flow, Software Packages, Hydrodynamic Modeling, Bridge, ISIS, MIKE11, HECRAS. 1 Assistant Prof., Natural Resources Department, Yazd University, mdastorani@yazduni.ac.ir mdastorani@yazduni.ac.ir V U' V3,A _. T' V#; &L 29

8P'! $w d* ' ; HM$.[x] <'1 A 1.Z F*A 0 g' 5% 5. h? 2 6Q9H 8@3 5*'Z < 0; 1*H03=< 8!'= 03=< 0?.<< <'A 23 1%? F 6* < $ D H C)? ($ 1 $3#@: F*A $w d*?m$ )A $ 0= 2E3 I&H 13 9; <'Q & 1I&$H #UU, 2;) ISIS : _ [ ( Y93< d&$h?s) MIKE11 ( (FQ3 < j 6* d* H.( I*4 k 6?$ ) HECRAS <? <' F*A #P< 5. )A 1!= H2E3 < F*A 1I&$H ) 1? )A L& $ H< 1 ^ 0&U 6*.$3< <'= * " 09A H? * < F*A? 0@ < 2 E3 0? 6* d* H 1*3' ^ 1* <' <* 1< V; 1< G^' < # 5" S'3 < *<U 23 Q*$I* H2 E3 6* 5!. *3.$H< 1 $, 5, 0*U <' QJ*4 < $ $3.)? AO3 I Q )D 1G3 1HQJ*4 #UU, 5!. H<< TU, 6* < QJ3< < E' d* < $ 0=? 1I*2 M$ d* < E' 6*.[ ] )? $*< <? FQ3 EQ )< < +? < 1! M3; d* 0; )? h; GBU RB? 1J 5!. H << 6*.)? 0 ^ F4 NZ < < 1? 1UU, O" š* < 0 )? 1 Hk*4 0 : F4 < 0 $ E73 E' 6* <? ) 23 1< # *<U (5" # I EP.)? $ G^ <? <' 23 M3 H FUU, 0 1'J. TU, S 5@^ 0 )? r 0 ' L H << h? ),! )^< ) E73 '2 Z *3 M$ *3 0*U )A) TU, 6* < <? )A E' 6* GBU 1*93 a 5.$ 5!. F 9Z (1HQJ*4.$H<1 FJ3 < $ <? V; '9H E' TU, 6* < : $3#@: 0; ) ^?0@ <' # 5" S'3 (03H< < ) 1?'^ 5" 1 Halcrow /Wallingford Software 2 DHI Water and Environment 3 US Army Corps of Engineers H1? #@?, : 03=< 5" d* 1.Z <? 5, < F*A 1I&$H ) T^< 1? (? (4 S 1< #] 5 1I&$H 9 <4 'Z 0 1I *<$H H3 23 1QJ4 LQ'? ($ H V;. 0H4 $*" 0; 1': )= 1; 5': 1? H1< S'^ k*? H$*$".)? 0&B $ H FA gu3 19 < " h* #= 1! < $ # 3 )UU. < 23 5': 6* 1 &$H 1? (F4 :.[[] )?H? S'3 6* $*" f < FA gu3 < #=? 5': 34 )=? 1.Z < 0 0?'" S'^0 1*".[_] )? $J3 1? 0&B 1'= 0 1 &$H #!'= 0; $3'1 h* FA?? < 0&? H <* " 5': ku3 6Q3 /3 < 5&< 0 0I (? 5*P< 0 03 hc 5': 6* T^< 1* )A.$1 " 1.Z < 1I&$H $1 * M'9 1 (M$ <? (1.Z?0 5, M$ )=? )A 3 <' #: Z ()&. 6* <.[j] 0&B 5!. *3? <'1 )< 1! O".< 1 ^ <? <' 1! O" 1.Z )A (M$.$ ' ; * 1I*2 ( 1* M$ d* $3'1 M$ hc 6I& ($3< 0/. 5^ )^< $ D H 1I*2 HM$ 5. )A ' ; HM$.$ H )^ 0 *2H" 1U * 1 (03=< 1?$ 0 g' 5% 0.)? << FJ3 <'= 23 1@? 1*4; 8@&c 0; <'1 $*< 0 0 6* < 23 <$ H2 E3 (): 69H < 0 ^ <? <' 3< gu3 < 0; )? $* 0; 19 0>.[m l] )? << 0% 1'= *3 23 <' 6* 1*4; F 9Z < ^ 0A' <' 0 6* < )A 34 +?' 0; )? 17*3 0 1; <9: H2E3 Q ()3 6* C<' 1 0% +* < 1.Z Q*$I* 34 *3 0*U 0 6* < EP #UU, E73.1HQJ*4 * 1^ *3 23 ), (1@Z M3 š* F' : 0 03=< < 4 F*A 5, 1? ): 69H 0 0 ^ <$ 5': f{ F*A $ D H.[u o] )? <'= 1!= 1$X" 23 F4 hc < 6I& ()? $w 0? 1? < 03=< < 4 $. k $w 0? ' ; M$ H<; J <' RB? T9: 1 Q3 )&. L& $ 1 )^ $X" F4 $w d* M$ d* 073 < <'1 0 /3 < 30

0*" 0? < 0: VU 5" 23 5" 6*.)? $ << FJ3 v 5I < 5" 6* < F*A1< $U < <? #?0@ <.)? $ E73 <* F*A V; F*A F' : ), 0@.$H<1 FJ3 5" S'3 6* 0 g' < (_ 5I F*A F' : ), F*A 1< $U < 5" 6*? (03f < & jl/lj) <* F*A (03f < & _ / u) V;.)? 0 E73 ' 40.73 FX/UE ' N 5 ' FX/ 40.73 UE ' 39.8 EW/V TU, 6* < $ <? E' GBU 1*93 )v 9. 5 cm 23 cm 5 cm 17 cm 40.73 cm 19 cm 19 cm 40.73 cm 03H< < 1?'^ 5" GBU )v cd efb xh 12 B b 23 cm 5 cm 17 cm 40.73 cm 39.8 cm 40.73 cm 0*" 0? < 0: VU 5" GBU E )v TU, 6* < $ <? H2 E3 #J *+ (==w 3 FQ3 < I&H 13 9; <'Q & 1I&$H #UU, 2; Y93< d&$h?s I*4 k 6?$ (Version)0$' (p a 0*'3O) p (_ [ b) ~ ~p (p a0*') 3.1.0(Beta) :?' ISIS MIKE11 HECRAS 31

0.35 ArchBridge Plan: Plan 07 Birmingham 18mflume Legend 0.30 EG PF 1 l g3 () 0.25 0.20 0.15 WS PF 1 Crit PF 1 Ground Left Levee Right Levee Obs WS PF 1 0.10 0.05 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 BU )^' 9H 0 E' 1&'Z GBU F )v c $3 F*A S'3 < H )? <^ 2 E3 6*.)? )A 1I *< 8 ; 1 ISIS.$*93?0@ $3 _ F4 < 0; <1 ; 0 F3 6? #P< <$: 5..<'1 <? 0BU3 l H0I@ 69*" R*! 1?'^ 5" * 4 $. S 0 g' #@?, ISIS <'Q & d&$h #UU, 2; +?' 0; 1 <? 5!. *3 e? 6*.$H<1 E73 )? $ 0% <?? $ V/ QJ*4 < 1I*2 HM$ ),! F'4 <' FQ3 < <'A' " 0 g' H<< d* 1?'^ " * 4 $. S.)? 0 ^ 1* ^ 0@?, <' 1'! 0 6* < 03H< $ D 03H< " < " F' : ), 12 < F4 #%2A 0; <1 6* < 0; )? ;r 0 EP.[a ] )? $*< R*J,"1?'^ $ RB? 23 ; H03H< d* H * RB? ( j 0@?, )? '9? e'^ 5I 0; W 6* e'^ S g' 7 23 5" P <A 0 g' F*A.[a ] <<1 (<'193 0 /3 < 6* < (? L *)? 0 2*? 0 g'?0@ H$. F'1 E2& #'! < 6* F<< k'" '/ 0 )? <'A' 2 E3 < 0 L*.<; 0 M$ 0 <' 0@?, )A 1 ISIS (< 0: VU " <' < d&$h ; < 0; <1 ; 0 5" * 4 $. S )? EP 6* <.[aa] )? $*< R*J 5" H0H4 " ;$. 0; 1*A 8,A) 5" )?<P < GBU RB? d* 0; 5" )?< 6*" < 23 GBU RB? d* (V*< 4 1< < (E' < GBU RB? 6*=4) )?< 6*" +* GBU RB? <$: k.$ << ^ "M3 T9:" ) a~ ( /y ( /v ( ( 5!' < $ $3 h 0 /y /v GZU 0; $ * E' $ )A.$3<' 0 ^ 5" )?< 6*" )?< P < 0! )?< P 8!'= (J gu3 < 4 RB? }93 $3 <? 23 1 GBU RB? <$ (5" )?< 6*".$ 0 /3 < 1* F 03 6*=4 0; ($*< 1? *? 0@ E73 )A << <? (<' <'A' TU, S F < 0; H2E3.<Q3 #'! $ <? 03 < 1ƒ*' TU, F*".$H<1 FJ3 H2 E3 6* #J a M$A $3 GBU RB? k : ($ 0 'Z F9H M$ 0 1*F #'! 0 23 Q*< GBU RB? [l ('2 i$ BU RB? (E' )?< 6*" )?<P )9^ <.$*< 0 13 )9^ < 0; 1&. < ($ 0 /3 < d* 5!' (<'1 5 5" *"? 0; j <$. M'Z < E'.(y 5 ) $ << M$ 0 V3 5!' BU RB? ISIS :?' * 5.? 0@ )A 0; )? ' ; 2 E3 d* ISIS $w d* )&. < F*A d&$h 0 g' 5% 5IJ 1 H03 * <'= <'1 G^ <? <' #UU, 2; +?' YJ #'! 0 2 E3 6*.)? $ [ $ $&' FQ3 < I&H 13 9; <'Q & d&$h 2 St.Venant Equations 1 HR Wallingford 3 Springing Level 32

0rA 3 ( YIB! 0 g'?0@ ( 6*.$ ;1? 0@ V 9 0&< < 1I&$H F*< 5': ; <'1?0@ 23 4 1< " #f ( 6* < 734.$H< ^ 1? <' )?< 6*" +* << A )A $3'1 L& (<; 1'" VJD 1? * 5': 6* 0; H3 0; <' < 6 X9H.$ h? 4 1< " 5, 14 J3 0; 1&. < * $ H V )U 0 g' 1'"VJD 1? * #] F'1 $1 \ 5? '.$1 h? (<; 3 = y I 6 M< W e? F*A #@?, ( 6* 6*.$H<1 E73 0rA YIB! H3 )? h? 4 1< " #f F$ <* h H03=<.[ap] $193 4 1< " #f?0@ 0 <^ 0; D [ 1I *< ' F4 < 0; MIKE111I *<$H k (F3 6? #P<) 1Q?'" V 9 0&< ($ $ 3 e? #P< 6* 5..$ 1 5. 1 M9:.<'1 E73 R*! <$, 5 MIKE11 < < 1?'^ 5" < F*A #@?, _ '&< * $3#@: 0; )? $ 0@ < 4 S '&< * <.<'Q & #UU,?s.<1 ^ <? <' 5" )?< 6*" GBU )?< P GBU <'1 0@?, _ 0B )?<P T9: e? F*A 1< 1/ 2 3 / 2 Q = 0.7083C (2g) Y D us 2 Y * b 1 0.1294 us 0.0177 r Y us r 4 :F4 < 0; (p) (( /zam/s 2 ) 0rA : g ( 1< 0 g' h* :C D ($ 23 5" )?<P 1< " $3 < 0; F*A T9: :Y us j,3 S :r 0 ( e'^ S 5, < 03H< W: :b 0 5" e'^ )&. 6* < 0 )? r 0 EP.)? 0 e'^ /3 < 1B #'! 0 03=< M3 GBU *$93 #'!.<<1 0@?, 4 T9: <'1 0 MIKE112 E3 (< 0: VU H5" <' < T9: +* W F*A <4 RB? 0 g' #@?, < ( H 1 (4 S ;$. )&. 6* <.$H<1 E73 M3 1 MIKE11 HD 2 Biery and Delleur 3 Spring Line M$ < ($?1 M3 T9: )&. 0 F*A 0; 1*A 8,A) )?<P < 4 1< " RB? #@?, )A.$ $ 0@ <'1 <? [ B < 0: VU 5" d* < 5" 2 2 2 A A VB a B h ka B = + 2 1 2g A 4 A 1 2 V B 2g :F4 < 0; 1< " :h (a) (1 1< " 0 g' h* :k (1 O3 h* :a 2 ()?<P GBU < 1J@ A O3 h* :a 1 ): 0 03=< W: 0 1*A) $ <J GBU < 1J@ A ( ( /x[ m/s 2 ) 0rA :g (($ V; 5" F9=? F*A GBU RB? :A B ($ <J GBU < ):? 6Q3 :V B )?< 6*" GBU < F*A GBU RB? :A 4 ($ <J GBU < $U 0; )? )?<P GBU < F*A 1; GBU RB? :A 1 2*? 1&9. F*A.<1 < 23 1< " 5!. 0; 1'! < 0Q3 ^ /3$ )&. 6* < 5" P $ 0 g' $. d* 0; )? EP $ V;. 1 6 D 0 5" #' 0 ()? <'A' 2 E3 < 0;) 2*??M$.[a ] << <2 M$ MIKE11 :?' * E $&' Y93< d&$h 0?s +?' 0; MIKE11 2 E3 0@ )A 1?$ 0. 2 E3 d* G^ < ()? $ H03=< (@ < '? MU3 4 ); (F*A? 0@ )A 2 d*?? 2 E3 6*.)? 4 HM3; HV? < A )**$ (1.Z '/ 0 $w d*? )A 27 0? F4 < )? $X" <? 03=< 34 $3'1 0> +* 0 ; 0; $ 0@ F*A 5, : $3#@: 0? 6*.[aa] $*93 3 = y I H3 $3 < 0; V 9 5; 0&< 6* < +* )&. 6*.<1 ^ <? <' $1 23 $ H< )? G*? #] < 0; 1Q H F*A?0@ )A.$*931 5 )? V;. $ 2A )&. 0 1Q H 23 0 4 1< " }93 0 g' #@?, )&. 6* < 6 X9H 0; )? h? 13 6* 3.<1 E73 1. <' < 23 )? V FI F < F*A 1? * #] 6 X9H )? $ 2A F*A?0@ 0 3 0; )U ; h (4 RB? h 0; 1*H03=<.[ap] $ 1 dd'; ($3' k") J3 ' 33

<? )9^ 6* F*A 0@?, )A 2*? <$3? 0&< 2 E3 23 $*41 P ($. J F*A 0 1&. <.<'1 #@?, < 2*? 1$\c ) d' 'Z 0 #@?, < <'= 0 <'= 2 E3 )&. 6* <.$H<1 )&=<.[ay] <'1 O3 0&< e? O3 ) $H 0 1*H" 0B < M$ F'?@& 0 )? 1*$ < M$ F'?@&.)? V << F'?@& 0 3 M$ H" 0 g' *<U? 0 <4 )UU. +* F4 M$ 0 'Z 0 )? <? <' +* 0 0A' < $ $3 *<U 8@&c )&. 6* <.$ $"? <'1 1? <<1 <? QJ*4 * )@Z $HJ *<U 0 M$ 1A= (M$ H" $U?0 0A'. TU, <.<< š*<23 ($ $3) $ 0 g' +* 0 $ <? 1HQJ*4 E' š* 0 * 0 F*A (Q*< NZ <' F * F4 9^ E9 < GBU <* 1$X" M$ F'?@& ()? $ 0 /3 < $3 H2E3 < M$ )=? " (TU, 6* <.)< $H'3 8!'= (M$ < <? <' H" $*< 1? +* (M3 H M< ) <? #P< 0 g' h* 6 X9H E' *" 0 g' 1 )^< F*A 1< T9: 0@?, )A H2E3 < $ $3 H<< ('/ 6* 0.<' << M$ 0 <4? 0@ " 0 #'! 6*$ ($*< <? ' L E' < 34 < 5"? F<< ^ 5@^ H2E3 š*h < E' (1A= M$ H" V/ < F*A 1< F< < $*< š*<23 *" < $ $3 *<U 0 M$.$? E' +* M$ 0? 6*$ * %+ N < (<0: VU 5" 1?'^ 5" 0 g' HM$ <.$ E73 <* F*A 1< V; F*A 1< <??0@ T9: )&. < E' *" ) ($ 23 8 @^ 0; 'ZF9H E' *" H<< ISIS 2 E3 <.) ^ M3 <.<'1 $&' 2 E3 <'= +?' M3 T9: )&. M3 T9: 0 g' H<< <7* FI ( MIKE 112E3 L& ()3 *L"FI 2E3 <'= <? E' *" ) $ < M$ < $*< 0@?, 1?< #'! 0 *<U 6* FI 1. 0 HECRAS 2E3.( t 3 0B <? <'1 0@?, j 0B <? 5" )?<P GBU 2 2 2 2 a V A A V k * 2 N2 N2 N2 N2 H 1 = + a (v) 1 2g A A 2g 4 1 :F4 < 0; RB? < +?' ):? :V N2 ( 1 1< " h* :k* T9: )&. < F*A GBU RB? :A N2 (M3 T9: < 5" GBU ((5" )?<P) [ GBU < F*A GBU RB? :A 1 (M3 :g ((5" )?< 6*") l GBU < F*A GBU RB? :A 4 h* :a ):? G*' h* :a ( ( /x[ m/s 2 2 1 ) 0rA.)? ):? G*' e9 < 5" 03H< U? )9^ F*A RB? 0; 1&. ), <'@3 <4 RB? )&. < F*A )UU. < ()? 5; Q*< #P< MIKE11 )&. 6* <.<<1 ', J 0 $H<1 ^ <? <' 5" * < F*A 0@?, )A.)? <'A' o GA < <' 6* < J #: Z HECRAS :?' * F k +?' $ <? TU, 6* < 0; HECRAS = 3 k 6?$ O'&$H 1?$ 2; < 03=< 5, d*?0@ )? <^ 2E3 6*.)? $ 0% I*4 4 RB? }93 #@?, 23 $3c $3 F*A $w [ g' F*A V*O 23 13, \' (13, * )&. < 1I&$H #@?, E73 )A 2E3 6*.[av] $H< E73 1@Z H03=< 5; V? $w d* F*A <.[ay] )? $ 1.Z? )?< HM3; $w d* 5. d* #@?, 1! $ *4 HECRAS 0 GBU RB? d* O3 0&<.)? '? O3 0&< )A <$3? E 0 E <? $ GBU RB? $H 6 X9H 2E3 6*.<'1 5. 4 RB? }93 0@?, f < 23 (t 3 0&< 0? 0) YIB! f < O3 ).$H<1 ^ 1* <' 03=< W: F$ <* V; " ($*931 <'= 5" 03H< U? 0 $4 P 4 0 1&. <.$1 J ), F*A )UU. < $1 \ 4 1<.$H<1 E73 )&. < #@?, 2 E3 ()&. 6* ^ 4 e9 < +U 5" 03H< U? 0; )? 13 (M )&. 03H< 0L 23 $. 6* 0; )? 13 (E< )&. <1 F*A 0; 1&..<< ^c )&. )? " 89 5" ($ ;1 M] 5" <A Q*< #@: 0 * $ ;1 2*? 5" 1 Mixed Flow 34

(V F*A 1< 1?'^ 5"? 0@) $ $3 *<U 0*U < 4 RB? S 0B < H2 E3 š* H 5!. () ( %@(&'./pa./paz./pp ()HECRAS S './pap./pap./pap./pap./pap./pap ~ a z ~ z () MIKE 11 S ' ~ ~ ~ ~ () ISIS S ' a z y p y y a a z y p *3 *+ a p v y ~ /~ /v /yv z z/~ a aa ap av ay a~ (<* F*A 1< 1?'^ 5"? 0@) $ $3 *<U 0*U < 4 RB? S 0B < H2 E3 š* H 5!. () ( %@ (&'./p ~./p ~./p z ()HECRAS S './pay./p ~ v v a z ~ () MIKE 11 S ' v a () ISIS S './pay./pay./pay y a ~ v a a p v y ~ /~ /v /yv z z/~ a aa ap av ay a~ *3 E *+ 35

V F*A 1< < 0: VU 5" M$ < $ $3 $?0@ 4 RB? S F *+ () ( %@ (&'./pa./pa./paz./paz./paz./pa./pa./pa./pa v z ()HECRAS S './pay./pay p p p a ~ () MIKE 11 S ' ~ ~ ~ () ISIS S ' a a z y p a p v y ~ /~ /v /yv z z/~ a aa ap av ay <* F*A 1< < 0: VU 5" M$ < $ $3 $?0@ 4 RB? S N *+ () ( %@ (&'./p~./p~./p./p./p~./p~./p~./p~z./p~a z a z z z ()HECRAS S './p~y./p ~ ~ y v p a () MIKE 11 S ' v v a a () ISIS S ' y a ~ v a a p v y ~ /~ /v /yv z z/~ a aa ap av ay F*A?0@ 5!. *3.$H<1 FJ3 (<' <'A' 0; y &$A < h 0 <0: VU 5" <' < <* V; k*93 z ~ I < 4 RB? }93.)? $ << k*93 ~ P < 4 RB? }93 0 g' ~ I.)? $ << }93 6* (z I )? 1?'^ 5" )?< 6*" )?< VU 5" <* V; F*A *?0@ < h 0 VH M3 T9: )&. < E' *" ) F<< ^ +?' ) 6* 5 1< 0B 0 'Z 0 (<?1.<<1 < M$ < $ 0@?, 2 E3 <'= RO S ' E V; F*A?0@ 5!. *3 h 0 v p &$A <' <) $HJ *3 9H 0 1?'^ 5" < <* F*A 36

() xh 12bb l g3 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 #w, + z zf )C 0.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 ISIS MIKE11 HECRAS 89: ;< 8=>9> $ $3 *<U H2E3 š* H 5!. *3 e? 4 RB? }93 N )v V F*A 1< 1?'^ 5"?0@ < () xh 12b l g3 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 &, + z zf )C 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 ISIS MIKE11 HECRAS 89: ;< 8=>9> $ $3 *<U H2 E3 š* H 5!. *3 e? 4 RB? }93 T )v <* F*A 1< 1?'^ 5"?0@ < 1*3 GBU RB? < F*A 1< M GBU RB? < F*A H 0; << FJ3 1* 6* 073.)? $ 0*U?0@ H 0 < 1< <; 59: '= <' 6* < 2E3 0?.<$3 13$ D N = V? 1A= 1< V? 0 <^ 2 E3 0? H $ DH 0; ) F'1 1; 'Z 0 *3 1& ($3<' < 0: VU 5" 1?'^ 5"?0@ < 0; 14 V7. (4 RB? S :.$H<1 FJ3 <0: 0*U 1* <' 23 <L1 V? J F d* <? TU, 6* < *?0@ 0I * 0 0A'.) ^ 1* )A * 13 < ()? 0 #'! $3 F*A 0*U +U 1* 6* L& <$3 13$ D E' 4 V7. 1< (Q*< #@: 0 C)? 0 E73 1A= < F*A 37

0.25 #w, + z D #$ )C 0.20 () xh 12b l g3 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 ISIS MIKE11 HECRAS 89: ;< 8=>9> $ $3 *<U H2 E3 š* H 5!. *3 e? 4 RB? }93 U )v V F*A 1< < 0: VU 5"?0@ < 0.35 0.30 &, + z D #$ )C 0.25 () xh 12b l g3 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 ISIS MIKE11 HECRAS 89: ;< 8=>9> $ $3 *<U H2 E3 š* H 5!. *3 e? 4 RB? }93 V )v <* F*A 1< < 0: VU 5"?0@ < d*<23 QJ*4 < $ $3 *<U 0 Q*< 2 E3 0/. 5^ $U 0 <' 6* < MIKE11 *3.)? )? $ $3 *<U 23 Q*< 2 E3 < P $3 *<U 6*" 1;$3 ISIS 0? 0 $ 0% *3 0? 0 $ 0% *3 23 < 0: VU 5" <' <.$1 <' <.)? $ $3 *<U 0 d*<23 8 ; HECRAS # 0/. 5^ 'Z0 <' 1= < 34 $ L= ):? 23 5" )?< P < $ 0@?, 4 S 6*P.<' *3 < 0; <' 1*H" 6*1! F' : 0 0Z' FJ3 M$A < *<U 6*.$1 # H2E3 < <'1 $HJ M$A 6* < 0; 'Z F9H.)? $ << < 0*U < HECRAS +?' $ 0% *3 1?'^ 5" <' 38

D #$ )C %& c $ E73 *?0@ < 5" )?<P < F4 0 g' ):? S $. T *+ f )C %& c ( ' ^ )D () l g3 (' ^ )D () l g3 :?' <* 1< V 1< <* 1< V 1< <* 1< V 1< <* 1< V 1< /a / z /va /pvy /a /aa /pay /a a ISIS /av / /p~y /pay /av / /p~v /pav HECRAS /a /ap /pav /a /y / y / vv /y MIKE11 /ap~ / v /p /pa /ap / v /p /pa $ $3 *<U %@ 8' F $3#@: 0; 1I&$H $ 0= 2E3 0? TU, 6* < $w d*?0@ )A MIKE11 HECRAS (ISIS ^ 1* <' <0: VU 1?'^ " * < F*A +* F' : 0 F*A # $U < 5" H <' <.) TU, 5!. *3 0 0A'.) ; 0 )?<P :) F'1?0@ )A EP #3I 2E3 0? H $ D H a FJ3 1 *3 1& ($3< 5" S'3 < H * < F*A.$3<< *<U H2E3 6* +?' $ 0% *3 0*U p 5" * < F*A?0@ )A 0; ) $* $ $3 )^< 1*3' (HECRAS 8!'=) ISIS HECRAS (1?'^ <* 0! MIKE11 *3 1& C$3<< FJ3 J.<< 1^ *3 <0: VU 5" * < F*A?0@ 0B < v 5!. *3 0; $ D H ($3<< 0% 1&'U *3 2E3 0? H *<U 0 h 0 Q*< 2 E3 < 0*U < HECRAS.)? d*<23 $ $3 1*3' 23 <? 1. ( *3 )^< 0 0A' y 2E3 HECRAS 0 $ J TU, 6* <,1I.$ 1 5" * < F*A? 0@ )A h? MIKE11 0? 0 $ 0% *3 1?'^ 5" I: 5" S'3 6* *3 0; 1&. < ()? $ $3 *<U 6*" 1;$3 13 #$ /3.$1 P $U ISIS +?' $ 0% N! 2 E3 0? š* H < M$ A 6=? )A 0; < HECRAS ISIS 2 E3 < 0; ) $* ()? $ 0?0@ 0< EP 9; F MIKE11 0*U?0@ 59 F<; A 0; 1&. < $3<< E73 1. $*"?0@ <' 3 J F MIKE11 HB= E" )*< 5&< 0 2E3 6* F<;;.< E73 0 )? 1&. < 6*.)< 13 # )^< 0 3 1"" $3Q3 2 E3 0? H # 1@^ 07 F2 MIKE11 23 1I *3' /3.)? <' 0J @*U ($H<193 k*93 1I #'! 0 $ <7* 5" GBU RB? 8!'= $ H<1 E73 59: 6* Q*< 2 E3 < 0; 1&. < <'= <&\' 1*3' 0 6* < HECRAS 0 H2 E3 *3 N = ): 1J $?1 /3 0.$1 0 0 34 < 0 )? 1 1@?, 5&< ): 0 23 1J $ 0&U 1@^ 9^ < 0 <'1 A 17? ()=? < 2 E3 '< * )&'? 1*3 *3 0 1*B= )? 6 9 )&. 6* < 0 $1 M$.<' 59, H2E3 1= ]+ N 1 Transport Association of Canada. (2004). Guide to bridge hydraulics, 2 nd Ed., Thomas Telford Ltd Press. 2 Hamill, L. (1999). Bridge hydraulics: theory and practice, 1 st Ed., E & FN Spon press..!b[! cd 456" 6 " 1+ VW %2 =Y _!(+8! <3 aa".(h) `?. 39

4 Kwan, T.L., YaoHsien, H., and YuhJu,C. (2006). Bridge blockage and overbank flow simulation using HECRAS in the keeling river during the 2001 Nari Typhoon. J. of hydraulic engineering, 132 (3), 319323. 5 Rodriguez, A., et al. (2000). Hydraulic analyses for a new bridge over the Parana river Argentina. International journal of sediment research, 18 (2), 166175..#" 6 " U+ VW #M3,8% \!(+8!.(H) `?..e f ".#% 456" 6 " 1%W VW U"[ \!(+8!.(H).g 4 \W[ +..# EA.* @8i #,& 6 " `6/ VW U"[ \!(+8!.().1.@!= +.h M6$ H 9Atabay,S., and Knight, D.W. (2002). Bridge afflux experiments in compound channels, A report written and presented to the JBA consulting engineers and UK Environmental Agency. 10 Wallingford and Halcrow. (2000). ISIS User Manual, UK. 11 Bradley, N. J. (1978). Hydraulics of bridge waterways, US Federal Highway Administration, Bridge Division, USA. 12 MIKE 11 User Manual. (2002). DHI, Denmark. 13 US Corps of Engineers. (2002). HECRAS User Manual, USA. 14 US Corps of Engineers. (1999). HECRAS Hydraulic Reference, USA. 40