Numerical diagonalization studies of quantum spin chains

Similar documents
Quantum spin systems - models and computational methods

Exact diagonalization methods

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 17 Jan 2011

Non-magnetic states. The Néel states are product states; φ N a. , E ij = 3J ij /4 2 The Néel states have higher energy (expectations; not eigenstates)

Spin liquids in frustrated magnets

Ground State Projector QMC in the valence-bond basis

Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations in the Valence Bond Basis. Anders Sandvik, Boston University

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

Spin liquids on ladders and in 2d

Critical Spin-liquid Phases in Spin-1/2 Triangular Antiferromagnets. In collaboration with: Olexei Motrunich & Jason Alicea

Gapless Spin Liquids in Two Dimensions

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003

Quantum Spin-Metals in Weak Mott Insulators

Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations in the Valence Bond Basis

H ψ = E ψ. Introduction to Exact Diagonalization. Andreas Läuchli, New states of quantum matter MPI für Physik komplexer Systeme - Dresden

Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions

Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 2 Solutions

Boulder School 2016 Xie Chen 07/28/16-08/02/16

Luigi Paolasini

Stochastic series expansion (SSE) and ground-state projection

T S z 1,S z 2,..., S z N = S z N,S z 1,..., S z N 1

The Hubbard model in cold atoms and in the high-tc cuprates

Notes on Spin Operators and the Heisenberg Model. Physics : Winter, David G. Stroud

Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of the Half-filled Hubbard Model. Anders F. J. Gabrielsson

Lecture 2: Deconfined quantum criticality

Quantum phase transitions in Mott insulators and d-wave superconductors

Spin-orbital separation in the quasi-one-dimensional Mott insulator Sr 2 CuO 3 Splitting the electron

Paramagnetic phases of Kagome lattice quantum Ising models p.1/16

Are these states normalized? A) Yes

Some open questions from the KIAS Workshop on Emergent Quantum Phases in Strongly Correlated Electronic Systems, Seoul, Korea, October 2005.

Lecture 11: Long-wavelength expansion in the Neel state Energetic terms

Quantum Phase Transitions

Ideas on non-fermi liquid metals and quantum criticality. T. Senthil (MIT).

Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of deconfined quantum criticality at. the 2D Néel-VBS transition. Anders W. Sandvik, Boston University

Solving the sign problem for a class of frustrated antiferromagnets

Tensor network simulations of strongly correlated quantum systems

SU(N) magnets: from a theoretical abstraction to reality

The Mott Metal-Insulator Transition

SPIN LIQUIDS AND FRUSTRATED MAGNETISM

SPIN-LIQUIDS ON THE KAGOME LATTICE: CHIRAL TOPOLOGICAL, AND GAPLESS NON-FERMI-LIQUID PHASE

Measuring Entanglement Entropy in Valence Bond Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 10

Quasi-1d Antiferromagnets

Dimerized & frustrated spin chains. Application to copper-germanate

Winter School for Quantum Magnetism EPFL and MPI Stuttgart Magnetism in Strongly Correlated Systems Vladimir Hinkov

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 22 Jun 2007

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Classical Monte Carlo Simulations

Emergent SU(4) symmetry and quantum spin-orbital liquid in 3 α-zrcl3

2. Spin liquids and valence bond solids

Coupled Cluster Method for Quantum Spin Systems

Design and realization of exotic quantum phases in atomic gases

Magnetoelastics in the frustrated spinel ZnCr 2 O 4. Roderich Moessner CNRS and ENS Paris

A New look at the Pseudogap Phase in the Cuprates.

Luigi Paolasini

Small and large Fermi surfaces in metals with local moments

Homework assignment 3: due Thursday, 10/26/2017

M. A. Gusmão IF-UFRGS

Quantum magnetism and the theory of strongly correlated electrons

Quantum and classical annealing in spin glasses and quantum computing. Anders W Sandvik, Boston University

Spin Superfluidity and Graphene in a Strong Magnetic Field

Quantum s=1/2 antiferromagnet on the Bethe lattice at percolation I. Low-energy states, DMRG, and diagnostics

Decoherence and Thermalization of Quantum Spin Systems

8.334: Statistical Mechanics II Problem Set # 4 Due: 4/9/14 Transfer Matrices & Position space renormalization

Tensor network methods in condensed matter physics. ISSP, University of Tokyo, Tsuyoshi Okubo

Computational strongly correlated materials R. Torsten Clay Physics & Astronomy

Quantum correlations and entanglement in far-from-equilibrium spin systems

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Realizing non-abelian statistics in quantum loop models

Spins and spin-orbit coupling in semiconductors, metals, and nanostructures

Topological order in the pseudogap metal

Deconfined Quantum Critical Points

Quantum Phases in Bose-Hubbard Models with Spin-orbit Interactions

Simulations of Quantum Dimer Models

Symmetric Surfaces of Topological Superconductor

A05: Quantum crystal and ring exchange. Novel magnetic states induced by ring exchange

Quantum phases of antiferromagnets and the underdoped cuprates. Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu

Newton s Method and Localization

Quasi-1d Frustrated Antiferromagnets. Leon Balents, UCSB Masanori Kohno, NIMS, Tsukuba Oleg Starykh, U. Utah

Spinons and triplons in spatially anisotropic triangular antiferromagnet

The bosonic Kondo effect:

Global phase diagrams of two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets. Subir Sachdev Harvard University

= a. a = Let us now study what is a? c ( a A a )

Frustrated diamond lattice antiferromagnets

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

Low-lying excitation spectrum of quantum many-body systems

Kitaev honeycomb lattice model: from A to B and beyond

Quantum Phase Transitions

Degeneracy Breaking in Some Frustrated Magnets. Bangalore Mott Conference, July 2006

221B Lecture Notes Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

Quantum Phase Transition

Neutron scattering from quantum materials

Spin liquid phases in strongly correlated lattice models

Ashvin Vishwanath UC Berkeley

5 Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry

R. Citro. In collaboration with: A. Minguzzi (LPMMC, Grenoble, France) E. Orignac (ENS, Lyon, France), X. Deng & L. Santos (MP, Hannover, Germany)

4 Surfaces and Interfaces

Hole dynamics in frustrated antiferromagnets: Coexistence of many-body and free-like excitations

Superfluid vortex with Mott insulating core

C/CS/Phys 191 Uncertainty principle, Spin Algebra 10/11/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 13

Transcription:

PY 502, Computational Physics, Fall 2016 Anders W. Sandvik, Boston University Numerical diagonalization studies of quantum spin chains Introduction to computational studies of spin chains Using basis states incorporating conservation laws (symmetries) magnetization conservation, momentum states, parity, spin inversion discussion without group theory - only basic quantum mechanics and common sense needed Lanczos diagonalization (ground state, low excitations) How to characterize different kinds of ground states critical ground state of the Heisenberg chain quantum phase transition to a valence-bond solid in a J1-J2 chain

Quantum spins Spin magnitude S; basis states S z 1,S z 2,...,S z N>, S z i = -S,..., S-1, S Commutation relations: [Si x,s y i ]=i Sz i (we set = 1) [Si x,s y j ]=[Sx i,sj z ]=...=[Si z,sj z ]=0 (i = j) Ladder (raising and lowering) operators: S + i = Si x + is y i, S i = Si x is y i S + i Sz i = S(S + 1) Si z(sz i + 1) Sz i +1, S i Si z = S(S + 1) Si z(sz i 1) Si z 1, Spin (individual) squared operator: Si 2 Si z = S(S + 1) Si z S=1/2 spins; very simple rules Si z =+ 1 2 = i, Si z = 1 2 = i Si z i =+ 1 2 i S i i = i S + i i =0 Si z i = 1 2 i S + i i = i S i i =0

Quantum spin models Ising, XY, Heisenberg hamiltonians the spins always have three (x,y,z) components interactions may contain 1 (Ising), 2 (XY), or 3 (Heisenberg) components H = J ij S z i S z j = 1 4 J ij i j (Ising) ij ij H = J ij [S x i S x j + S y i Sy j ]= 1 2 J ij [S + i S j + S i S+ j ] (XY) H = J ij Si S j = J ij [S z i S z j + 1 2 (S+ i S j + S i S+ j )] (Heisenberg Quantum statistical mechanics Q = 1 Z Tr H/T Qe Z =Tr e H/T = Large size M of the Hilbert space; M=2 N for S=1/2 - difficult problem to find the eigenstates and energies - we are also interested in the ground state (T 0) - for classical systems the ground state is often trivial M 1 n=0 e E n/t

Why study quantum spin systems? Solid-state physics localized electronic spins in Mott insulators (e.g., high-tc cuprates) large variety of lattices, interactions, physical properties search for exotic quantum states in such systems (e.g., spin liquid) Ultracold atoms (in optical lattices) some spin hamiltonians can be engineered (ongoing efforts) some bosonic systems very similar to spins (e.g., hard-core bosons) Quantum information theory / quantum computing possible physical realizations of quantum computers using interacting spins many concepts developed using spins (e.g., entanglement) quantum annealing Generic quantum many-body physics testing grounds for collective quantum behavior, quantum phase transitions identify Ising models of quantum many-body physics Particle physics / field theory / quantum gravity some quantum-spin phenomena have parallels in high-energy physics e.g., spinon confinement-deconfinement transition spin foams, string nets: models to describe emergence of space-time and elementary particles

Prototypical Mott insulator; high-tc cuprates (antiferromagnets) CuO2 planes, localized spins on Cu sites - Lowest-order spin model: S=1/2 Heisenberg - Super-exchange coupling, J 1500K Many other quasi-1d and quasi-2d cuprates chains, ladders, impurities and dilution, frustrated interactions,... H = J i,j S i S j Cu (S = 1/2) Zn (S = 0) Ladder systems - even/odd effects non-magnetic impurities/dilution - dilution-driven phase transition

The antiferromagnetic (Néel) state and quantum fluctuations The ground state of the Heisenberg model (bipartite 2D or 3D lattice) H = J S i S j = J [Si z Sj z + 1 2 (S+ i S j + S i S+ j )] Does the long-range staggered order survive quantum fluctuations? order parameter: staggered (sublattice) magnetization; [H,ms] 0 m s = 1 N N i=1 m s = 1 N S A SB i S i, i =( 1) x i+y i (2D square lattice) If there is order (ms>0), the direction of the vector is fixed (N= ) conventionally this is taken as the z direction m s = 1 N N i=1 i S z i = S z i For S (classical limit) <ms> S what happens for small S (especially S=1/2)? \

Numerical diagonalization of the hamiltonian To find the ground state (maybe excitations, T>0 properties) of the Heisenberg S=1/2 chain H = J = J N i=1 N i=1 S i S i+1 = J N i=1 [S x i S x i+1 + S y i Sy i+1 + Sz i S z i+1], [S z i S z i+1 + 1 2 (S+ i S i+1 + S i S+ i+1 )] Simplest way computationally; enumerate the states construct the hamiltonian matrix using bit-representation of integers 0 =,,,..., (= 0...000) 1 =,,,..., (= 0...001) 2 =,,,..., (= 0...010) 3 =,,,..., (= 0...011) H ab = hb H ai a, b 2 {0, 1,...,2 N 1} bit representation perfect for S=1/2 systems use >1 bit/spin for S>1/2, or integer vector construct H by examining/flipping bits

spin-state manipulations with bit operations Let a[i] refer to the i:th bit of an integer a In Fortran 90 the bit-level function ieor(a,2**i) can be used to flip bit i of a bits i and j can be flipped using ieor(a,2**i+2**j) a 2 i +2 j ieor(a, 2 i +2 j ) Other Fortran 90 functions Translations and reflections of states ishftc(a,-1,n) shifts N bits to the left btest(a,b) checks (T or F) bit b of a ibset(a,b), ibclr(a,b) sets to 1 or 1 bit b of a

The S=1/2 Heisenberg chain hamiltonian can be constructed according to: do a =0, 2 N 1 do i =0,N 1 j = mod(i +1,N) if (a[i] =a[j]) then H(a, a) =H(a, a) + 1 4 else H(a, a) =H(a, a) 1 4 b = flip(a, i, j); H(a, b) = 1 2 endif enddo enddo j is the right nearest-neighbor of i periodic boundary conditions

Diagonalizing the hamiltonian matrix on the computer gives the eigenvalues and eigenvectors If U is the matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of H, then n A n =[U T AU] nn is the expectation value of some operator A in the n:th eigenstate Problem: Matrix size M=2 N becomes too large quickly maximum number of spins in practice; N 20 M 2 matrix elements to store, time to diagonalize M 3 Using conservation laws (symmetries) for block-diagonalization We can choose the basis in such a way that the H becomes block-diagonal H the blocks can be diagonalized individually we can reach larger N (but not much larger, N 40 is max)