A Simple Problem Which Students Can Solve and Check Using an Inexpensive Calculator

Similar documents
Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using Pro/MECHANICA Wildfire 5.0

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Truss Structures: The Direct Stiffness Method

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

k 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44

46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference April 2005 Austin, Texas

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example

STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Using the finite element method of structural analysis, determine displacements at nodes 1 and 2.

[5] Stress and Strain

Stress analysis of a stepped bar

BOOK OF COURSE WORKS ON STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FOR THE 2 ND YEAR STUDENTS OF THE UACEG

IV B.Tech. I Semester Supplementary Examinations, February/March FINITE ELEMENT METHODS (Mechanical Engineering) Time: 3 Hours Max Marks: 80

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Reg. No. : Question Paper Code : B.Arch. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL/MAY Second Semester AR 6201 MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES I

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

14. *14.8 CASTIGLIANO S THEOREM

CAAM 335 Matrix Analysis Planar Trusses

P.E. Civil Exam Review:

If the number of unknown reaction components are equal to the number of equations, the structure is known as statically determinate.

Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. Introduction

SRSD 2093: Engineering Mechanics 2SRRI SECTION 19 ROOM 7, LEVEL 14, MENARA RAZAK

CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses

3.032 Problem Set 1 Fall 2007 Due: Start of Lecture,

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS Credit Hours: 6

CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS

Lecture 4 Honeycombs Notes, 3.054

Two Tier projects for students in ME 160 class

CE 206: Engineering Computation Sessional. System of Linear Equations

Vector Mechanics: Statics

Stiffness Matrices, Spring and Bar Elements

Structural Analysis of Truss Structures using Stiffness Matrix. Dr. Nasrellah Hassan Ahmed

A. Objective of the Course: Objectives of introducing this subject at second year level in civil branches are: 1. Introduction 02

Project Engineer: Wesley Kinkler Project Number: 4.14 Submission Date: 11/15/2003. TAMUK Truss Company Trusses Made Simple

JEPPIAAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE

FREE VIBRATIONS OF FRAMED STRUCTURES WITH INCLINED MEMBERS

Parametric study on the transverse and longitudinal moments of trough type folded plate roofs using ANSYS

Composite Structural Mechanics using MATLAB

7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES

POE Practice Test - Materials

4 Finite Element Method for Trusses

Development of Truss Equations

ME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS

A new computational method for threaded connection stiffness

Statics Principles. The laws of motion describe the interaction of forces acting on a body. Newton s First Law of Motion (law of inertia):

Due Monday, September 14 th, 12:00 midnight

PVP BUTANE STORAGE BULLET CALCULATION AND FEA VERIFICATION

Discretization Methods Exercise # 5

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

1.105 Solid Mechanics Laboratory

Mechanical Design in Optical Engineering

ME 475 Modal Analysis of a Tapered Beam

Chapter 2: Deflections of Structures

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ME 6603 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS PART A (2 MARKS)

Jeff Brown Hope College, Department of Engineering, 27 Graves Pl., Holland, Michigan, USA UNESCO EOLSS

Equilibrium Equilibrium and Trusses Trusses

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

MATHEMATICS 132 Applied Mathematics 1A (Engineering) SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION

Geometric Misfitting in Structures An Interval-Based Approach

Discontinuous Distributions in Mechanics of Materials

T R U S S. Priodeep Chowdhury;Lecturer;Dept. of CEE;Uttara University//TRUSS Page 1

Strength of Material. Shear Strain. Dr. Attaullah Shah

Principles Of Engineering. Part A

Study of Rotational Column with Plastic Hinge

STRUCTURAL SURFACES & FLOOR GRILLAGES

2 marks Questions and Answers

Simulation of Geometrical Cross-Section for Practical Purposes

Effect of Angular movement of Lifting Arm on Natural Frequency of Container Lifting Mechanism using Finite Element Modal Analysis

CIVL 8/7117 Chapter 12 - Structural Dynamics 1/75. To discuss the dynamics of a single-degree-of freedom springmass

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

To show how to determine the forces in the members of a truss using the method of joints and the method of sections.

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

PROBLEM #1.1 (4 + 4 points, no partial credit)

Free Body Diagram: Solution: The maximum load which can be safely supported by EACH of the support members is: ANS: A =0.217 in 2

Mechanics of Materials

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

3.5 STRESS AND STRAIN IN PURE SHEAR. The next element is in a state of pure shear.

Table of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level

EVALUATING DYNAMIC STRESSES OF A PIPELINE

Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.

ENGR-1100 Introduction to Engineering Analysis. Lecture 19

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Pin-Jointed Frame Structures (Frameworks)

Statics Chapter II Fall 2018 Exercises Corresponding to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3

ME Statics. Structures. Chapter 4

BHAR AT HID AS AN ENGIN E ERI N G C O L L E G E NATTR A MPA LL I

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir

Address for Correspondence

Chapter 14 Truss Analysis Using the Stiffness Method

MEG 741 Energy and Variational Methods in Mechanics I

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Excel Spreadsheet in Mechanical Engineering Technology Education

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A WESTFALL 2800 MIXER, BETA = 0.8 GFS R1. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE. Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Material subjected to combined direct and shear stresses:

4. SHAFTS. A shaft is an element used to transmit power and torque, and it can support

WORKBOOK MECHANICS OF MATERIALS AND ELEMENTS OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURES

Transcription:

Session 3649 A Simple Problem Which Students Can Solve and Check Using an Inexpensive Calculator Patrick J. Cronin The Pennsylvania State University New Kensington Campus Abstract This paper proposes a simple engineering structural analysis problem which can be used to introduce lower division engineering or engineering technology students to the fundamentals of the finite element analysis (FEA) method. Step by step the student sets up the matrix equation which represents the system of simultaneous linear equations which is necessary to solve for the unknown displacements at each of the nodes. They then solve this system of equations using a numerical method which is efficient for large numbers of equations. All of this they do with an inexpensive scientific calculator. As the final step they calculate the stress in each structural member. 1. Introduction Finite element analysis (FEA) software can produce color stress contour plots representing the stress at thousands of points within a machine part with dozens of forces applied. A student studying stress analysis for the first time can beneficially be exposed to the terminology and progression of calculations used to calculate the stresses in the elements of an FEA model. Terms involved in FEA analysis include: nodes, local and global stiffness matrices, local and global coordinate systems, forward reduction, and backward substitution. A model which I have used is a truss composed of three strut elements which form a triangle. Each strut has a simple 4 x 4 local element stiffness matrix 1. The local x direction of each strut makes a non-zero angle with the global X axis. Therefore, the local stiffness matrix of each strut must be transformed into a global element stiffness matrix. The transformation is done using transformation matrices based upon the angle between the local and global coordinate systems. All of these calculations can be done using an inexpensive scientific calculator. The required data consists of: (1) the Page 5.56.1

number of nodes and elements, (2) the (x,y) coordinates of each node, and (3) node i, node j, area, and elastic modulus of each element. The student calculates: (1) the local and global stiffness matrices of each element, (2) the global stiffness matrix of the structure, (3) the displacement of each node in the X and Y directions using the applied forces and boundary conditions, and (4) the stresses in each element. Some additional points are the following ones. Stress contours are not shown on truss element FEA models. Often, small squares of red, blue, etc. colors (red representing the highest axial stress) are shown in the middle of each truss element. Another point is that I indicate to the students that the calculations they will perform would also be done by a computer performing an FEA analysis, but a much larger set of finite elements, forces, displacements, and stresses would be involved. One of the educational objectives is to give the students a good understanding of solving an engineering stress analysis problem which must be accomplished by setting up and solving a large set of simultaneous linear equations (usually performed by a computer). The calculations shown in this paper could be used as the basis of programming this type of FEA analysis. 2. Description of the Problem An elevation view of the structure for which the stress analysis is to be performed is shown in Figure 1. It is a planar truss structure. The joint constraints are shown in Figure 1, as are the forces applied at the joints. Figure 1. The structure for which a stress analysis is required. Page 5.56.2

Each of the three truss members is made of steel. The modulus of elasticity value which will be used for the steel is 3 x 1 6 lb/in 2. The data for the three joints and members is given in Table 1. Table 1. Data for the structure joints and members. Joint F x, lb F y, lb 1 1, 2, 2 1, 3 Member Length, in Cross-section Area, in 2 1 12 3. 2 169.7 4. 3 12 5. The geometry of the structure was chosen such that each of the truss members has a different angle of inclination with the horizontal lines.. The goal of the exercise is to calculate the tensile or compressive stress in each of the three truss members using an FEA model of the truss with the given applied forces and joint constraints. A scientific calculator is to be used. No stored algorithms such as simultaneous equation solvers are to be used. 3. Solution of the Problem The finite element model of the truss is shown in Figure 2. The global coordinate system for the structure is also shown in the figure. The node number at which each element begins and ends is shown in Table 2. The truss element itself is depicted in Figure 3. The angle of inclination of the element with the global X axis is angle θ. The value of this angle can be between -18 and 18. Table 2. The node at which each element begins and ends. Element Node i Node j 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 Each of the element stiffness matrices can be written as [ K ] - [ K ] - [ K ] [ K ] [ K ] where Page 5.56.3

Figure 2. The FEA model of the structure to be analyzed. Figure 3. The pin-jointed bar (truss) element. Page 5.56.4

[ K ] AE L 2 λ λµ λµ 2 µ and λ cos θ and µ sin θ. For element number 1 θ 3 o and [ K ] 5.63E5 3.25E5 3.25E5 1.88E5 The units of the K matrix numbers are lb/in. For element number 2, θ 165 o and For element number 3, [ K ] 6.6E5 1.77E5 1.77E5 4.74E4 θ 12 o and [ K ] 3.13E5 5.41E5 5.41E5 9.38E5 The assembled structure stiffness matrix becomes [ K S ] [ K11] [ K12 ] [ ] [ ] K 21 K 22 where Page 5.56.5

[ K 11] 8.76E5 2.16E5 5.63E5 2.16E5 1.13E6 3.25E5 5.63E5 3.25E5 12.23E5 [K 12 ], [K 21 ], and [K 22 ] are similar looking 3 x 3 matrices but will not be given here since they are not needed to solve for the desired displacements at nodes 1 and 2. The matrix equation for the entire structure is where [K S ] {u} {F} {u} [u 1x u 1y u 2x ] T {F} [F 1x F 1y F 2x F 2y F 3x F 3y ] T Forces F 1x, F 1y, and F 2x are the applied forces of 1, lb, 2, lb, and 1, lb, respectively. Forces F 2y, F 3x, and F 3y are the three unknown reaction forces. Choleski s method 2 can be used to solve for the unknown displacements u 1x, u 1y, and u 2x. That matrix equation is [K] {u} {F} where [K] [K 11 ] {u} [u 1x u 1y u 2x ] T {F} [F 1x F 1y F 2x ] T Choleski s method is based upon [K] [L] [L] T where [L] is a lower triangular matrix. The elements of the lower triangular matrix can be calculated as l 11 k 11 1/2 9.36E2 l 21 k 21 / l 11-2.31E2 Page 5.56.6

2 l 22 ( k 22 l 21 ) 1/2 1.4E3 l 31 k 31 / l 11-6.1E2 l 32 ( k 32 l 21 l 31 ) /l 22 4.96E2 l 33 ( k 33 l 2 31 l 2 32 ) 1/2 7.85E2 The equation for forward reduction is Lv F so 9.36E2 2.31E2 6.1E2 1.4E3 4.96E2 7.85E2 v v v 1 2 3 1 2 3 The solution to this matrix equation is relatively easily obtained as v 1 1.7, v 2 2.16, v 3 3.46 The equation for backward substitution is L T u v so 9.36E2 2.31E2 1.4E3 6.1E2 4.96E2 7.85E2 u u u 1 2 3 1.7 2.16 3.46 The solution to this matrix equation can be obtained giving Therefore, the displacements at nodes 1 and 2 are u 1 5.1E 3, u 2 4.18E 3, u 3 4.41E 3 u 1x 5.1E-3 inches, u 1y 4.18E-3 inches u 2x 4.41E-3 inches The equation for the axial stress can be found 2 to be σ x ( E/L) [ -λ -µ λ µ ] [u 1x u 1y u 2x u 2y ] T Page 5.56.7

for the element between nodes 1 and 2. Therefore, the stress is calculated as σ x 3E6 12 [-.866 -.5.866.5 ] 5.1E 3 4.18E 3 4.41E 3 σ x -652 lb/in 2 Using the same approach for elements 2 and 3 leads to σ x 753 lb/in 2 (element 2) σ x - 279 lb/in 2 (element 3) More exact stress values could be obtained by using a larger number of significant digits in the calculations. 4. Summary A simple three element FEA problem has been shown. It is a problem which students can solve without investing an overly burdensome amount of time and effort. It includes FEA procedures similar the the ones which would be performed by a high speed computer solving a large FEA problem. It gives the student an insight into what happens to the large amount of input data which causes it to become the colored contour stress plots which are now the standard FEA stress result presentations. References 1. Martin, H.C. and Carey, G.F., Introduction To Finite Element Analysis, McGraw-Hill,1973. 2. Przemieniecki, J.S., Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 1968. PATRICK J. CRONIN Patrick Cronin is currently an Assistant Professor of engineering at The Pennsylvania State University New Kensington Campus. He holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and an M.S. degree in Civil Engineering, both from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He previously worked as an engineer performing stress and vibration analysis of various types of mechanical equipment. Page 5.56.8