A Brief Review on Akkar, Sandikkaya and Bommer (ASB13) GMPE

Similar documents
EFEFCTS OF GROUND MOTION UNCERTAINTY ON PREDICTING THE RESPONSE OF AN EXISTING RC FRAME STRUCTURE

Probability-Based Seismic Assessments: Implementing Wide-Range Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Methods

Probability Distributions for Gradient Directions in Uncertain 3D Scalar Fields

Chapter 9: Inferences based on Two samples: Confidence intervals and tests of hypotheses

Tests for the Ratio of Two Poisson Rates

THERMAL EXPANSION COEFFICIENT OF WATER FOR VOLUMETRIC CALIBRATION

1B40 Practical Skills

APPROPRIATE ATTENUATION MODEL FOR CHIANG MAI, THAILAND FROM FIELD MEASUREMENT TO MODEL EQUATION

A027 Uncertainties in Local Anisotropy Estimation from Multi-offset VSP Data

Analysis of Foreshock Sequences in California and Implications for Earthquake Triggering

Lecture 3 Gaussian Probability Distribution

Math 1B, lecture 4: Error bounds for numerical methods

Section 11.5 Estimation of difference of two proportions

APPROXIMATE INTEGRATION

Simplified procedure to estimate ground settlement from seismic compression in compacted soils

Nonextensive analysis of crustal seismicity in Taiwan

Tremor-rich shallow dyke formation followed by silent magma flow at Bárðarbunga in Iceland

Driving Cycle Construction of City Road for Hybrid Bus Based on Markov Process Deng Pan1, a, Fengchun Sun1,b*, Hongwen He1, c, Jiankun Peng1, d

Lecture INF4350 October 12008

Student Activity 3: Single Factor ANOVA

On the Uncertainty of Sensors Based on Magnetic Effects. E. Hristoforou, E. Kayafas, A. Ktena, DM Kepaptsoglou

PHYSICS ASSIGNMENT-9

Math 8 Winter 2015 Applications of Integration

Polynomial Approximations for the Natural Logarithm and Arctangent Functions. Math 230

A New Statistic Feature of the Short-Time Amplitude Spectrum Values for Human s Unvoiced Pronunciation

Comparison Procedures

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

Now, given the derivative, can we find the function back? Can we antidifferenitate it?

LECTURE 14. Dr. Teresa D. Golden University of North Texas Department of Chemistry

Non-Linear & Logistic Regression

5.1 How do we Measure Distance Traveled given Velocity? Student Notes

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Data Assimilation. Alan O Neill Data Assimilation Research Centre University of Reading

Entropy ISSN

Section 5.1 #7, 10, 16, 21, 25; Section 5.2 #8, 9, 15, 20, 27, 30; Section 5.3 #4, 6, 9, 13, 16, 28, 31; Section 5.4 #7, 18, 21, 23, 25, 29, 40

Credibility Hypothesis Testing of Fuzzy Triangular Distributions

Acceptance Sampling by Attributes

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

Precalculus Spring 2017

approaches as n becomes larger and larger. Since e > 1, the graph of the natural exponential function is as below

Log1 Contest Round 3 Theta Individual. 4 points each 1 What is the sum of the first 5 Fibonacci numbers if the first two are 1, 1?

Linear Inequalities: Each of the following carries five marks each: 1. Solve the system of equations graphically.

Hybrid Group Acceptance Sampling Plan Based on Size Biased Lomax Model

Operations with Polynomials

Chapter 1: Fundamentals

Emission of K -, L - and M - Auger Electrons from Cu Atoms. Abstract

SESSION 2 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions. Math 30-1 R 3. (Revisit, Review and Revive)

Geophysical Journal International

Solutions to Supplementary Problems

Physics 9 Fall 2011 Homework 2 - Solutions Friday September 2, 2011

New data structures to reduce data size and search time

7.2 The Definite Integral

Predict Global Earth Temperature using Linier Regression

List all of the possible rational roots of each equation. Then find all solutions (both real and imaginary) of the equation. 1.

Fig. 1. Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Systems with Plant Variations

CMDA 4604: Intermediate Topics in Mathematical Modeling Lecture 19: Interpolation and Quadrature

KEYWORDS: Seismic hazard, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty, Sudan

ELE B7 Power Systems Engineering. Power System Components Modeling

Remarks to the H-mode workshop paper

Math 426: Probability Final Exam Practice

SOLUTIONS FOR ADMISSIONS TEST IN MATHEMATICS, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND JOINT SCHOOLS WEDNESDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2014

Sufficient condition on noise correlations for scalable quantum computing

a < a+ x < a+2 x < < a+n x = b, n A i n f(x i ) x. i=1 i=1

The Properties of Stars

Scientific notation is a way of expressing really big numbers or really small numbers.

Stein-Rule Estimation and Generalized Shrinkage Methods for Forecasting Using Many Predictors

Jackson 2.26 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Math 113 Exam 2 Practice

The steps of the hypothesis test

SUMMER KNOWHOW STUDY AND LEARNING CENTRE

Exponents and Logarithms Exam Questions

Time : 3 hours 03 - Mathematics - March 2007 Marks : 100 Pg - 1 S E CT I O N - A

Lesson 5.3 Graph General Rational Functions

Rule 1 Rule 2 Rule 3 Rule 4. Balance Weight

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

QUADRATIC EQUATIONS OBJECTIVE PROBLEMS

Supporting Online Material for

Phys 7221, Fall 2006: Homework # 6

New Expansion and Infinite Series

Measuring Electron Work Function in Metal

USA Mathematical Talent Search Round 1 Solutions Year 21 Academic Year

DECAMETER RADIO EMISSION OF THE SUN: RECENT OBSERVATIONS

Multi-objective optimization of dielectric layer photonic crystal filter

APPLICATIONS OF THE DEFINITE INTEGRAL

5.7 Improper Integrals

Magnitude and Frequency of Avalanches in Relation to Terrain and Forest Cover

CS667 Lecture 6: Monte Carlo Integration 02/10/05

Chapter 3 Polynomials

Lecture 14: Quadrature

The EbayesThresh Package

Experiments with a Single Factor: The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1

Math 116 Final Exam April 26, 2013

Spanning tree congestion of some product graphs

CHM Physical Chemistry I Chapter 1 - Supplementary Material

1 Module for Year 10 Secondary School Student Logarithm


Temperature influence compensation in microbolometer detector for image quality enhancement

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 A NON-CONTACT SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORTING OBJECTS USING ULTRASONIC LEVITATION

Minimum Energy State of Plasmas with an Internal Transport Barrier

Probabilistic Investigation of Sensitivities of Advanced Test- Analysis Model Correlation Methods

Transcription:

Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Chrcteriztion Senior Seismic Hzrd Anlysis Committee Level 3 Workshop #2 October 22-24, 2013 A Brief Review on Akkr, Sndikky nd Bommer (ASB13 GMPE Sinn Akkr Deprtment of Civil Engineering, Middle Est Technicl University 06800 Ankr, Turkey

Outline o Overview of ASB13 with emphsis on o Mgnitude dependence of sigm o Reduction in sigm fter 3 seconds o Dependence of residuls on depth o Norml fulting fctors

Mjor fetures of ASB13 o Developed using subset of RESORCE (Reference Dtbse for Seismic- Ground Motion in Europe o Totl number of erthqukes: 221 o Totl number of records: 1041 o Minimum nd mximum response periods: PGA, PGV nd T = 1s T = 4.0s o Horizontl component definition: Geometric men o Distnce metrics: R epi, R hyp nd o Mximum distnce: 200 km o Mximum depth: 30 km o Minimum nd mximum moment mgnitude: M w 4 M w 7.6 o Minimum nd mximum V S30 (ll mesured: V S30 = 92 m/s V S30 = 2165 m/s o Recommended mgnitude, distnce, period nd V S30 intervls: o 4 M w 8 o Distnces up to 200 km o PGA, PGV nd 1s T 4 s o 150 m/s V S30 1200 m/s

Overll distribution of strong-motion dtbse M w 8 7 6 5 4 o 3-component, 1041 recordings with distnces less thn 200 km o 221 erthqukes (MS AS with focl depths less thn 30 km nd M w 4. o Ech event hs t lest 2 recordings o 322 sttions with mesured V S30 vlues. o Mgnitudes up to M w 7 nd distnces > 5 km re well represented

SoF nd V S30 bsed distribution of strongmotion dtbse o Few dt with V S30 > 800 m/s nd V S30 < 180 m/s o Reverse-fulting erthqukes re poorly represented. Most dt come from norml (Itlin nd strike-slip (Turkish events o M w > 7 events re mostly from strike-slip erthqukes

Depth distribution of strong-motion dtbse o Events with M w > 6 hve depths less thn 20 km o Depth distribution is more uniform for M w 6

Functionl Form [ ] [ ] t JB w REF S SoF R M Y Y εσ = ln,, ( ln ln( [ ] [ ] > = 1 9 8 2 6 2 1 5 4 2 3 1 7 1 1 9 8 2 6 2 1 5 4 2 3 1 2 1 ln( ( (8.5 ( ln( ( (8.5 ( ln( c M F F R c M M c M c M F F R c M M c M Y w N R JB W w w w N R JB W w w REF Medin ground-motion for reference rock Site effect Aletory vribility Sinn Akkr 11/07/2013

Style-of-Fulting (SoF fctors o SoF coefficients re found to be sensitive to the distribution of fulting type in the dtbse. o They re obtined by removing the smll events (M w < 5 hving less thn 3 recordings (eliminte the poorly recorded events. N:SS 1.4 1.2 1.0 Firly consistent pttern with CB08 nd AB10 This study AB10BAD12 AS08 BA08 CB08 CY08 1 0.1 1 R:SS 1.4 1.2 1.0 Very complicted ptterns. No model is entirely comptible with the others 1 0.1 1 Period (s Z TOR is ssumed s zero for AS08, CB08 nd CY08 Period (s

Residul nlysis overll trends Between-event Residuls Within-event Residuls Within-event Residuls 1.0 0.5-0.5-1.0 2 1 0-1 -2 2 1 0-1 -2 T = s T = s T = 1.0s T = s 4 5 6 7 8 M w 100 1000 V S30 (m/s T = s 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8 M w 100 1000 V S30 (m/s T = 1.0 s M w 100 1000 V S30 (m/s o Dt do not support mgnitude-dependent sigm (sprse dt smpling towrds lrge mgnitudes o No bised estimtions in terms of distnce o Slight overestimtion t very soft sites nd under estimtion for rock sites t short periods (e.g., T = s

Residul nlysis dependence of mgnitude Stndrd devition Between-event residuls (T = s Between-event residuls (T = s 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Within-event residuls (T = s 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Within-event residuls (T = s Between-event residuls (T = 1.0s 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Within-event residuls (T = 1.0s Vrition of stndrd devition seems to be independent of mgnitude for M w 6.5. Stndrd devition 0.7 0.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 0.7 0.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 0.7 0.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 For lrger mgnitudes, the fluctutions cn be misleding s there is fewer dt. M w M w M w

Residul nlysis mgnitude nd SoF dependence

Sigm Mu Sigm Mu Sigm Mu Modeling uncertinty considering mgnitude nd SoF PGA - Strike-Slip Strike-slip PGA - Norml PGA - Reverse 0.3 0.1 1 10 p 100 0.3 0.1 1 10 p 100 0.3 0.1 PGA T=s T=1.0s 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 M4.0 M4.5 M5.0 M5.5 M6.0 M6.5 M7.0 M7.5 M8.0 o No significnt differences between M4.0 norml M4.5 nd strike-slip M5.0 M5.5 M6.0 erthqukes. M6.5 Modeling M7.0 M7.5 M8.0 uncertinty is higher for reverse events with respect to other two M4.0 SoF M4.5 M5.0 M5.5 M6.0 o More M6.5 relible results M7.0 M7.5 M8.0 between 4.5 M w 6

Residul nlysis depth dependence PGA T = s T = 1.0s - - - Norml Events Reverse Events Strike-Skip Events p = 87 p = 07 p = 0.339 - - - - - - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 p = 0.17 p = 11 p = 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - -1.0-0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 - - - - - - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Depth p = 5 p = 09 p = 8 - - - Depth - - - - - - Depth

Stndrd devition R epi Stndrd devition 1.0 totl within-event between-event 1 0.1 1 Period (s R hyp o Vrition of sigm is lmost period independent except for the portion between 3s nd 4s. o The level of totl sigm is similr to AB10. It is slightly lrger with respect to NGA- W1 GMPEs.

Reduction in stndrd devition fter T = 3s At T = 4s, 36% of ccelerogrms nd 28% of erthqukes re removed due to low-cut filter vlues used in dt processing. 1.0 Dt Loss (in % 40 30 20 10 Accelerogrms Erthqukes Dt loss doubles between T = 3s nd T = 4s Stndrd Devition (for model totl sigm within-event sigm between-event sigm 0 0 1 2 3 4 Period (s Considerble reduction in the dt size for T 3s results in the observed decy in stndrd devitions 1 0.1 1 Period (s

Conclusions 1/3 Mgnitude-dependence of sigm (for lrger erthqukes o Dtbse contins few lrge mgnitude events bove M w 7. Thus, the distribution of dt does not llow estblishing mgnitudedependent sigm. o The vrition of stndrd devition seems to be independent for M w 6.5. o The model uncertinty seems to be less significnt for 4.5 M w 6 for the whole distnce rnge. Influence of depth on ASB13 estimtes o The vrition of between-event residuls in terms of depth indicte tht the bis in norml nd strike-slip ground-motion estimtions is insignificnt with respect to reverse events. The reverse fult ground motions tend to be overestimted with incresing depth.

Conclusions 2/3 How well the estimtes re for different SoF? o SoF coefficients show similrities with CB08 nd AB10 for N:SS rtios. They differ significntly with the compred GMPEs for R:SS rtios. The dtbse is rich in terms of norml nd strike-slip erthqukes. It is believed tht N:SS rtios re stble in our model. o The insignificnt M w -dependent between-event residul trends for N nd SS estimtes indicte better performnce of ASB13 for these fulting mechnisms. The sme performnce is not observed for reverse erthqukes o The model uncertinty lso seems to be less significnt for norml nd strike-slip events. This observtion supports the stbility of N:SS rtios (or stbility of N nd SS SoF coefficients.

Conclusions 3/3 Reduction in sigm fter T = 3.0s o The decrese in number of erthqukes nd ccelerogrms results in sudden drop in sigm fter T = 3.0s. o The within-event sigm seems to be ffected more by the decrese in ccelerogrms fter T = 3s o The reduction in between-event sigm is observed only for T 3.8s due to decrese in event number.

References o Akkr S, Sndikky MA nd Bommer J (2013. Empiricl ground-motion models for point- nd extended-source crustl erthquke scenrios in Europe nd the Middle Est. Bulletin of Erthquke Engineering, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4 o Akkr S, Sndikky MA nd Bommer J (2013. Errtum to: Empiricl ground-motion models for point- nd extendedsource crustl erthquke scenrios in Europe nd the Middle Est. Bulletin of Erthquke Engineering, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9508-6 o Al Atik L nd Youngs RR (2013. Epistemic uncertinty for NGA-West2 models. Pcific Erthquke Reserch Center, University of Cliforni t Berkeley, PEER Report 2013/11

Thnk you