Copyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.

Similar documents
TO-17 Extending the Hydrocarbon Range above Naphthalene for Soil Vapor and Air Samples Using Automated

ELECTRONICALLY REPRINTED FROM. Volume 34 Number 3 MARCH

SAB Soil Vapour Forum July 8, Overview of Soil Vapour Assessment From A Laboratory Industry Perspective

A Single-Method Approach for the Analysis of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Air Using Thermal Desorption Coupled with GC MS

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC

Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

The Application of Method TO-15 to Naphthalene Measurements in Indoor Air

Analysis of SVOCs in Indoor Air Using Thermal Desorption GC/MS

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

CIA Advantage-xr. Cryogen-free automated canister and whole-air sampling system

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Vapor Intrusion Sampling Options: Performance Data for Canisters, Badges, and Sorbent Tubes for VOCs

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Selection of a Capillary GC Column

Author. Abstract. Introduction

Analysis of TO-15/TO-17 air toxics in urban air using TD GC/TOF MS and automated compound identification software

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

Innovative Thermal Desorption From Agilent Technologies. Vivek Dhyani Application Chemist

Target Compound Results Summary

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

Determination of VOC in Artificial Runway by Multiple Headspace Extraction-GC/MS. Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry APPLICATION.

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Selection of a Capillary

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

AppNote 6/2004. Thermal Desorption GC Analysis of High Boiling, High Molecular Weight Hydrocarbons SUMMARY

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

THE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Accelerated Solvent Extraction GC-MS Analysis and Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Tar analysis by Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) associated with Thermal Desorption (TD) and Gas Chromatography (GC) analysis

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

Fast, Quantitative Analysis of Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

GC/MS: A Valid Tool for Soil Gas Hydrocarbons Speciation

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Magnitudes of Back Diffusion During Long-Term Diffusive Sampling of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Carbotrap and Chromosorb 106

Thermal Desorption Technical Support. Note 56: TD-GC/MS analysis of vapour-phase organic compounds for materials emissions testing.

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

TDTS 16 Round-the-clock, on-line and cryogen-free monitoring of hydrocarbons from acetylene to trimethylbenzene in ambient air

Determination of VOCs by USEPA Method 8260 with Extended Dynamic Range using Fast, Sensitive Capillary GC/MS

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Characterising Volatile Organic Compounds from Sewer Emissions by Thermal Desorption coupled with Gas- Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

CALA Directory of Laboratories

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

DETERMINATION OF UPTAKE RATES FOR VOCs IN AMBIENT AIR BY USING AXIAL TYPE THERMAL DESORPTION PASSIVE TUBES

Series 2. Continuous monitoring of trace chemical vapours

Test Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe

U.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination

TPH Methods and Measurements and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion (PVI) Risks

For Routine Level Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Data Validation (pg.

Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME

Test Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe

Application Note 059 Direct Desorption of Car Trim Materials for VOC and SVOC Analysis in Accordance with VDA Method 278

APPLICATION NOTE. A Capillary Approach to ASTM D3606: Test Method for Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Finished Motor and Aviation Gasoline

Transcription:

Optimizing Sampling and Analytical Parameters for Soil Vapour Samples using Automated Thermal Desorption / Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry (ATD/GC/MS) Stephen Varisco, Technical Manager, CARO Analytical Services Lee Marotta, GC/MS Product Specialist, PerkinElmer LAS Miles Snow, GC/MS Product Specialist, PerkinElmer LAS Copyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.

Outline Objective: Soil Vapour Tube Background CARO Analytical Services Soil Vapour Regulations Thermal Desorption Technology Advantages Operation Tube Design and Adsorbent Optimization Limitations of current tubes for soil vapour samples Objectives of new tube New Tube Performance Characteristics

Background information on CARO Analytical Services British Columbia based Full Service Environmental Testing Capabilities Technical Leadership in Soil Vapour Co-authored BC SV Reference Methods ISO 17025 Accreditation for SV (www.cala.ca) Client Collaboration Knowledgeable & Accessible Staff Equipment Rentals, Client Training SR&D Projects VOC Artifacts in Tubing (www.caro.ca/soilvapour) Custom TD Tube Development VOC Sorption on Tubing in progress

Regulatory Background 23 US States regulate Soil Vapour Intrusion British Columbia Contaminated Sites Regulations, Schedule 11 Effective January 1, 2009 118 regulated parameters: >90% via TD Stringent regulations Trichloroethene (TCE) 1.0 ug/m 3 (dry cleaning site) Benzene 1.5 ug/m 3 (gasoline site) Why is soil vapour important? Protection of Human Health Test water and soil first? Or Test vapour first?

Advantages and Operation of Thermal Desorption Technology

Advantages of Thermal Desorption Technology Air Toxics Charcoal Tubes 1. Established methodology 2. Convenient transport 3. Easy to clean immediate reuse fast turnaround 4. Cost effective 5. Large sample volumes 6. Suitable for non-polar and polar compounds 7. Inherent Water Management 8. Enables Recollection to preserve sample

State 1: Sample Tube Desorption IS and/or surrogate spike Optional inlet split Desorb flow Temperature Flow Time xxxxxx Peltier-cooled trap no need for liquid cryogen Inert gas

Stage 2: Transfer of Sample to Instrument Optional outlet split or Recollect on same tube or new tube Column Flow = 2.5mL/min Recollect Flow = 10mL/min %Recollected = 80% GC Detector heated trap Carrier gas in Analytical column

Optimizing Sample Integrity with Thermal Desorption Automatic Internal Standard addition Recollection onto the same tube or new tube Automated Leak Checking Impedance Testing Excellent Water Management

Total Ion Chromatogram of a 74 TO-15 and TO-17 Component Mix Linearity AT_032609_09 100 Mass Range: 35 to 300 AMU Conc: 20ng on Column Broad Boiling Point Range: Chloromethane to Naphthalene 22.97 23.59 27-Mar-2009 + 01:37:40 25.82 Scan EI+ TIC 3.23e8 21.34 15.02 19.51 18.73 18.42 20.52 21.28 25.66 26.18 % 17.81 26.30 10.95 2.97 5.57 7.99 9.53 6.99 8.32 8.89 7.33 10.75 12.62 12.33 13.58 14.59 15.37 16.74 19.72 23.89 3.27 4.02 4.69 5.00 5.67 6.55 6.01 10.34 11.16 15.65 16.02 13.14 0 2.77 4.77 6.77 8.77 10.77 12.77 14.77 16.77 18.77 20.77 22.77 24.77 26.77 Time

Tube Design and Adsorbent Optimization

Thermal Desorption Tube Multiple Adsorbents accommodate wide boiling point range sample Weaker Adsorbent Strong Adsorbent Strongest Adsorbent Sample Stream Carrier for Desorption DESORB ADSORB

Goal Optimize a Tube for Soil Vapour Intrusion Sampling Soil vapour differs from other air sampling applications: Higher moisture Greater analyte range Wider concentration range Limitations of current industry-standard sorbent tubes: Lack of a weak adsorbent prevents release beyond nc12 Ensure Safe sampling volumes for the low boilers

Characteristics of New Thermal Desorption Tube Broadest Analytical Range dichlorodifluoromethane to phenanthrene nc3 nc22+ Protects the Strong Adsorbents Prevents irreversible adsorption Clean after one desorption cycle Good Safe Sampling Volumes Optimal Water Management

Soil Vapour Intrusion Tubes Performance Characteristics

Precision, Linearity (average for Class) and Reporting Limits Instrumentation: PerkinElmer TurboMatrix 650 Thermal Desorber PerkinElmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Compound Class # Comp Precision (%RSD) Dynamic Range Reporting Limit Outliers n=8 0.2 to 200 ng 10 liter sample (FS) on RL Gasses 6 6.9% 0.9952 0.05 ug/m3 non-aromatic Halogens 33 2.7% 0.9985 0.02 ug/m3 CHCl 3 =0.05ppb Aromatics 15 1.4% 0.9995 0.02 ug/m3 Halogenated Aromatics 9 1.4% 0.9997 0.02 ug/m3 Others 10 2.7% 0.9965 0.05 ug/m3

Recovery Results EXCELLENT 79 components investigated 400ng VOC mix + 250ng PAH Range: difluorodichloromethane to phenanthrene Recovery procedure Analyzed spiked tube Analyzed blank tube Re-analyzed spiked tube which should be clean Non-detectable carryover Slight carryover of 4 heaviest PAHs Significantly below method criterion 100 100 PAH Compounds % Carryover (very low) 1-Methyl Napthalene 0.3 Anthracene 0.2 Fluorene 0.6 Phenanthrene 1.2 AT_040809_07 % 0 AT_040809_11 % 0 Spiked Tube 10.59 Re-inject of spiked tube 11.87 12.53 13.99 09-Apr-2009 + 14:13:55 Scan EI+ 153+166+142+178 2.06e8 9.44 9.94 10.44 10.94 11.44 11.94 12.44 12.94 13.44 13.94 14.44 14.94 15.44 14.07 Scan EI+ 153+166+142+178 2.06e8 Time

Tube Robustness Diesel Carryover <1% new 650_040809_08 100 10,000ng Diesel spiked tube 24.55 25.87 26.98 27.96 08-Apr-2009 + 16:57:46 Scan EI+ TIC 6.96e8 % 22.91 20.72 24.01 17.71 21.34 22.37 0 new 650_040809_10 100 Reanalysis of this tube to determine Carryover 25.54 26.78 28.06 28.83 29.64 Scan EI+ TIC 6.96e8 % 0 28.82 27.95 9.00 11.00 13.00 15.00 17.00 19.00 21.00 23.00 25.00 27.00 29.00 31.00 33.00 Time

What is Breakthrough? Goal: Regulated compounds do not break through EPA TO-17: The volume sampled when the amount of analyte collected in a back-up sorbent tube reaches a certain percentage (typically 5%) of the total amount collected by both sorbent tubes Calculation: BT / (BT+spiked)*100% BT = concentration of back tube Spiked = concentration of front tube Safe Sampling Volume (SSV): 2/3 of Breakthrough Volume Assessing breakthrough in the real-world: Sampling in series Sampling in parallel (distributed volume pairs)

Manifold used for determining breakthrough & moisture retention Injector Nitrogen carrier gas Spiked Clean water bubbler Sample Tube spiked 300ng of 79 components Total = 23,700ng on tube Passed humidified N 2 through tube flow rate = 100mL/min Time = 100min Mimic 10L sampling All studies performed in triplicate

Slight Breakthrough of only two Components out of 79 VOCs VOC gasses: 10L of sample 70% humidity Component % BT Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 Chloromethane 5.4 Vinyl Chloride nd Bromomethane nd Chloroethane nd Trichlorofluoromethane nd

Water Management

Methods of Water Removal 1. Nafion Drier / Desiccants Polar Compounds Removed - Cannot be used 2. Hydrophobic adsorbents 3. Minimize sampling volumes while maintaining regulated detection limits 4. Dry Purging Typically not required for indoor air

Why Remove Moisture? Mass Spectrometer (detector) problems Signal quenching Increased maintenance Poor chromatography Can cause false negatives AT_050609_BT_14 100 3.05 With Dry Purge 3.54 Water 07-May-2009 + 03:49:07 Scan EI+ Sum 1.85e7 AT_050209_BT_22 100 No Dry Purge 2.96 3.04 3.22 3.38 3.49 3.67 3.78 3.86 3.97 4.60 4.21 4.30 4.54 03-May-2009 + 04:04:33 Scan EI+ Sum TIC 1.59e9 1.85e7 4.81 4.96 5.02 5.51 5.25 5.605.76 5.90 5.96 6.12 6.25 6.42 6.50 2.63 2.11 2.22 2.43 2.82 3.26 4.25 2.95 3.70 % 6.43 % 3.49 4.04 3.02 3.22 4.22 3.66 5.16 5.96 6.11 1 2.18 2.38 2.58 2.78 2.98 3.18 3.38 3.58 3.78 3.98 4.18 4.38 4.58 4.78 4.98 Time 01 Time 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00

Real World Sample Petroleum Contamination (Tank Pull Site) Abundance 1700000 Component Result (ug/m3) 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 72.7 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 16.2 Benzene 1.6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 9.1 Ethylbenzene 12.3 Naphthalene 20.9 Tetrachloroethene 9.9 Toluene 45.7 900000 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.2 800000 Xylenes (total) 80.0 nc6-nc13 9950 1600000 1500000 1400000 1300000 1200000 1100000 1000000 700000 TIC: 090515a-39.D 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 Time--> 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 nc6 nc10 nc13

Summary Thermal Desorption Technology Tubes well-suited for vapour intrusion investigations Instrumentation Advancements Analytical Integrity Team developed new Thermal Desorption Tube that Achieves 1. Broadest Analytical Range 2. Protection of the Strong Adsorbents 3. Good Safe Sampling Volumes 4. Optimal Water Management Presentation available for download at www.caro.ca or www.perkinelmer.com

Acknowledgements Project Team: CARO Analytical Services: Stephen Varisco, Technical Manager Luba Tsurikova, Senior Analyst Patrick Novak, Business Manager Brent Mussato, President PerkinElmer: Lee Marotta, Senior Product Specialist Miles Snow, Senior Product Specialist Copyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.