Introduction to Accelerators

Similar documents
Longitudinal Dynamics

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Putting it all together

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

Accelerators. There are some accelerators around the world Nearly all are for industrial (20 000) or clinical use (10 000)

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Introduction to Collider Physics

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Introduction to particle accelerators

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

Physics at Accelerators

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Low Emittance Machines

Low Emittance Machines

Introduction to Accelerator Physics

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Particle physics experiments

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Theory English (Official)

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

LECTURE 18. Beam loss and beam emittance growth. Mechanisms for beam loss. Mechanisms for emittance growth and beam loss Beam lifetime:

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Practical Lattice Design

Note. Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

Accelerator Physics. Elena Wildner. Transverse motion. Benasque. Acknowldements to Simon Baird, Rende Steerenberg, Mats Lindroos, for course material

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Accelerator Physics Weak Focussing. A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, and T. Zolkin Jefferson Lab Colorado State University Lecture 2

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Transverse Dynamics II

The CERN Accelerator School holds courses in all of the member states of CERN. 2013, Erice, Italy

10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics

Practical Lattice Design

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Weak focusing I. mv r. Only on the reference orbit is zero

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

Engines of Discovery

Historical developments. of particle acceleration

Accelerator Physics Weak Focusing. S. A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, S. DeSilva, R. Gamage Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 2

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

COMBINER RING LATTICE

Accelerator Physics and Technologies for Linear Colliders University of Chicago, Physics 575

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

Vacuum Science and Technology in Accelerators

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Emittance preservation in TESLA

CEPC and FCCee parameters from the viewpoint of the beam-beam and electron cloud effects. K. Ohmi (KEK) IAS-HEP, HKUST, Hong Kong Jan.

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 9, Physics 663, lecture 2 1

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Operational Experience with HERA

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

EP228 Particle Physics

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Single-Bunch Effects from SPX Deflecting Cavities

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

STATUS OF BEPC AND PLAN OF BEPCII

Beam Transfer Lines. Brennan Goddard CERN

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

Accelerators. The following are extracts from a lecture course at Nikhef (Amsterdam).

Fundamentals of Accelerators

Particle Accelerators. The Electrostatic Accelerators

RF System Calibration Using Beam Orbits at LEP

Particle Accelerators

Non-Scaling Fixed Field Gradient Accelerator (FFAG) Design for the Proton and Carbon Therapy *

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Beam-beam effects. (an introduction) Werner Herr CERN, AB Department. (/afs/ictp/home/w/wfherr/public/cas/doc/beambeam.pdf)

Why do we accelerate particles?

Transcription:

Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt, CERN CAS Platja d Aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 1

Why an Introduction? The time where each accelerator sector was working alone in its corner is definitively over! Modern machines are at the limit of technology, so that individual (ideal) requests often cannot be fulfilled. The only solution is to find a reasonable compromise, which implies for each sector to understand the (sometimes extreme) requests from the other sectors, and to be able to explain its (sometimes extreme) requests to the other sectors: (e.g. beam dynamics <-> magnets < > Power Converters ) This lecture is an attempt to introduce a few basic concepts of transverse beam dynamics, which might be useful for vacuum considerations. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 2

Accelerators in the world (2002) Basic and Applied Research Medicine High-energy phys. 120 Radiotherapy 7500 S.R. sources 50 Isotope Product. 200 Non-nuclear Res. 1000 Hadron Therapy 20 Industry Ion Implanters 7000 Industrial e- Accel. 1500 Total: 17390 Courtesy: W. Mondelaers JUAS 2004 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 3

Ideal linear machines (linacs) E Target - + - + - + - + Available Energy : E c.m. = m. (2+2γ) 1/2 = (2m.(m+E)) 1/2 with γ = E/E 0 Advantages: Single pass High intensity Drawbacks: Single pass Available Energy Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 4

Improved solution for E c.m. e - e + - + - + - + - + Available Energy : E c.m. = 2mγ = 2E with γ = E/E 0 Advantages: High intensity Drawbacks: Single pass Space required Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 5

Keep particles: circular machines Basic idea is to re-use the particles or keep them in the machine. Move from the linear design To a circular one: Need Bending Need Dipoles! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 6

Circular machines (E c.m. ~ (me) 1/2 ) fixed target: cyclotron fixed target: synchrotron RF huge dipole, compact design, B = constant low energy, single pass. varying B, small magnets, high energy Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 7

Colliders (E c.m. =2E) Colliders: electron positron proton - antiproton Colliders with the same type of particles (e.g. p-p) require two separate chambers. The beam are brought into a common chamber around the interaction regions Ex: LHC 8 possible interaction regions 4 experiments collecting data Question: What about LHC physics with fixed target? Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 8

Beam Dynamics A particle is described by: Its azimuthal position along the machine: s Its momentum: p Its horizontal position: x Its horizontal slope: x Its vertical position: y Its vertical slope: y i.e. a sixth dimensional phase space (s, p, x, x, y, y ) Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 9

Circular machines: Dipoles Classical mechanics: B Equilibrium between two forces Lorentz force Centripetal force F = e.(v x B) F = mv 2 /ρ evb = mv 2 /ρ p = m 0.c.(βγ) Magnetic rigidity: Bρ = mv/e = p/e Relation also holds for relativistic case provided the classical momentum mv is replaced by the relativistic momentum p Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 10

Simple but fundamental relation! If you already have a site and you know the physics (E) to be achieved -> you know the magnets required (SC or warm). If you have the site and do not want to go for SC magnets -> you know the energy range you can cover (fixed target or collider). Now, check LHC physics with fixed target.! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 11

Ideal circular machine: Neglecting radiation losses in the dipoles Neglecting gravitation ideal particle would happily circulate on axis in the machine for ever! Unfortunately: real life is different! Alignment of the machine Ground motion Gravitation: Δy = 20 mm in 64 msec! Limited physical aperture Field imperfections Energy error of particles and/or (x, x ) inj (x, x ) nominal Error in magnet strength (power supplies and calibration) Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 12

From Ideal to Real machines Most of the particles are NOT ideal particles (x,x,y,y,p) (x,x,y,y p) ideal Sooner or later these particles will hit the walls and will be lost! How can we keep these particles within the vacuum chamber? Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 13

Focusing with quadrupoles F x = -g.x F y = g.y Force increases linearly with displacement. Unfortunately, effect is opposite in the two planes (H and V). Remember: this quadrupole is focusing in the horizontal plane but defocusing in the vertical plane! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 14

Alternating gradient focusing Basic new idea: Alternate QF and QD QF QD QF QD QF Let us first consider a «non-ideal» injection in position and slope (x, x ) or (y, y ) Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 15

Alternating gradient focusing It can be shown that a section composed of alternating focusing and defocusing elements has a net focusing effect, provided the quadrupoles are correctly placed. What happens to «non-ideal» particles? QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD The «non-ideal» particles perform an oscillation around the «ideal» trajectory. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 16

Thin lens analogy of AG focusing x 1 0 x x out = -1/f 1 x in x Δx = x/f X out = x in + 0.x in x out = (-1/f).x in + x in 1 L Drift = 0 1 More intuitively: f 1-L/f L QF-Drift-QD = -L/f 2 1+L/f x 1 < x 2 Initial: x = x and L < f x = 0 x 1 x 2 F x Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 17 QD QF

The FODO cell: QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD L 4 L One complete oscillation in 4 cells 90 / cell μ = 90 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 18

Real circular machines (no errors!) The accelerator is composed of a periodic repetition of FODO cells: L B D B F The phase advance per cell μ can be modified, in each plane, by varying the strength of the quadrupoles. The ideal particle will follow a particular trajectory, which closes on itself after one revolution: the closed orbit. The real particles will perform oscillations around the closed orbit. The number of oscillations for a complete revolution is called the Tune Q of the machine (Qx and Qy). Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 19

The beta function β(s) (β) 1/2 The β-function is the envelope around all the trajectories of the particles circulating in the FODO lattice. The β-function has a minimum at the QD and a maximum at the QF, ensuring the net focusing effect of the lattice. It is a periodic function in the FODO lattice. The oscillations of the particles are called betatron motion or betatron oscillations. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 20

Phase space at some position (s) Select the particle in the beam with the largest betatron motion and plot its position vs. its phase (x vs. x ) at some location in the machine for many turns. X ideal X ε Is the emittance of the beam [π mm mrad] ε is a property of the beam (quality) Measure of how much particle depart from ideal trajectory. β is a property of the machine (quadrupoles). Beam size [m] Area = π.ε σ(s) = (ε.β(s)) 1/2 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 21

Emittance conservation QF QD QF The shape of the ellipse varies along the machine, but its area (the emittance ε) remains constant for a given energy. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 22

Recapitulation The fraction of the oscillation performed in a FODO cell is called the phase advance μ per cell (x or y). The total number of oscillations over one full turn of the machine is called the betatron tune Q (x or y). The envelope of the betatron oscillations is characterised by the beta function β(s). This is a property of the quadrupole settings. The quality of the (injected) beam is characterised by the emittance ε. This is a property of the beam and is invariant around the machine. The r.m.s. beam size (measurable quantity) is σ = (β.ε) 1/2. What about a «non-ideal» injection energy Δp/p 0? Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 23

Off momentum particles: For particles with Δp/p 0, the magnets induce other important effects like: The dispersion (dipoles) The chromaticity (quadrupoles) These effects will not be treated in this lecture! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 24

Real high energy collider Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 25

Vacuum and Accelerators In HEP, accelerators are used to produce: - Collisions (fixed target or colliders) - Synchrotron light This requires: - High intensities - As small as possible beams - As long as possible runs Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 26

e.g. for colliders: the Luminosity dn/dt = L x σ [1/s] = [1/(cm 2.s)] x [cm 2 ] L = N 1.N 2.f.k/(4.π.σ x.σ y ) Vacuum with: N 1,2 = Number of particles per bunch f = revolution frequency k = number of bunches σ x,y = horixontal and vertical beam size Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 27

Intensity: Impedance Z L (ω) (1) Perfect conductor: E s = 0 M. Ferrario CAS Baden 2005 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 28

Impedance Z L (ω) (2) If conductor is not perfect, or, even worse, if b const. b d L M. Ferrario CAS Baden 2005 Es 0 => there is an interaction between the beam and the wall! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 29

Impedance Z L (ω) (3) Worst case: abrupt changes in the cross-section of the pipe: M. Ferrario CAS Baden 2005 The beam looses energy (heating problems), but the induced fields can act back on the bunch or on the following bunches: => Instabilities! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 30

Induced fields e.m. fields induced in the RF cavities during the passage of a bunch. The fields can act back either on the bunch itself or, on the following bunches M. Ferrario CAS Baden 2005 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 31

Impedance Z L (ω) (4) Not surprisingly: I max 1/Z L (ω) Select carefully the materials you are using. Avoid any (unnecessary) change in the cross-section. When variations of the cross-section are unavoidable, use smooth tapers (α 15 ). Z L (ω) is a complex function. The quality of the design is characterised by the value of Z/n with n=ω/ω 0. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 32

Z/n as a function of time: Machine Z/n [Ω] PS ( 1960) > 50 SPS ( 1970) 20 LEP ( 1990) 0.25 (1.0) LHC ( 2007) 0.10 (0.25) Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 33

LHC Beam-Screen (material) Without proper Cu-coating of the beam-screen, nominal intensity foreseen for the LHC could not circulate in the machine! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 34

Transverse Impedance Z T (ω) In case of a broad-band impedance, there is a very convenient relation between the longitudinal and the transverse impedances, namely: Z T (ω) = (2R/b 2 ). Z L (ω)/n [Ω/m] This relation clearly shows that magnets designers, vacuum experts and financial considerations might favour solutions which are opposite to those of accelerator physicists! The only solution is to understand each other s constraints and to find the best possible compromise. Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 35

Vacuum: beam sizes and Lifetime A poor vacuum can affect the beam in different ways: Blow-up of the beam sizes (performance). Induce losses by deflecting particles outside the aperture (lifetime): Physical aperture Dynamic aperture RF acceptance Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 36

Gas scattering Particles scatter with residual gas molecules in the vacuum chamber: Two main SINGLE particle effects: Elastic collisions (particles deflected resulting in increase of betatron oscillation => apertures!). Inelastic collisions (particles loose energy either by energy transfer to the residual gas molecule or by photon emission Bremsstrahlung effect => RF acceptance) Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 37

Elastic scattering Apertures are very important for elastic scattering. The lifetime at a given position (s) in the machine for elastic scattering behaves like: τ 1/ β s P s i.e. inversely proportional to the product of gas partial pressure and the beta function => pumping at places with large beta functions is appropriate! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 38

Synchrotron radiation Charged particles bent in a magnetic field emit synchrotron radiation! with γ = E/E 0 = m/m 0 and m 0 is the rest mass Energy loss: eu 0 = A. γ 4 /ρ m 0 proton = 0.938 GeV/c 2 m 0 electron = 0.511 MeV/c 2 (m o-p /m o-e ) 4 = (1836) 4 10 13 Collider B (T) E/beam (GeV) γ eu 0 (GeV) LEP (e + e - ) 0.12 100 196000 2.92 LHC (p-p) 8.3 7000 7500 0.00001 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 39

The power is all too real! 4 ccγ E Pγ = 2 2π ρ L. Rivkin CAS-Trieste2005 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 40

Synchrotron radiation (2) Desorption of gas molecules by synchrotron radiation is the main source of residual gas in synchrotron light sources! P γ E 4 /ρ 2 Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 41

E-cloud effect Accumulation of electrons which can perturb the circulating beam. Strongly depends on intensity, bunch spacing and surface conditioning Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 42

Conclusions Vacuum design has to take into account the accelerator physics constraints (and vice-versa). On top of considering beam-gas interactions, the choice of the correct materials and of the most appropriate geometry is essential in the design phase of the vacuum system. A poor vacuum design will definitively affect the optimal operation of the accelerator (apertures, instabilities). I hope to have convinced you that the time where experts from individual fields were working alone is definitively over! Platja d'aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 43