Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

Similar documents
GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

Appendix I Feasibility Study for Vernal Pool and Swale Complex Mapping

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Harrison 1. Identifying Wetlands by GIS Software Submitted July 30, ,470 words By Catherine Harrison University of Virginia

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

High Speed / Commuter Rail Suitability Analysis For Central And Southern Arizona

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

The Invasion of False Brome in Western Oregon

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Potential Restorable Wetlands (PRWs):

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Background. North Cascades Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement. Steve Rochetta

Mapping and Modeling for Regional Planning

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

1.1 What is Site Fingerprinting?

Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography. Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Restoring Rivers in Cumbria Online Story Map of a case study on the River Lyvennet

Appendix J Vegetation Change Analysis Methodology

RESTORATION EVALUATION PROJECT. University of Minnesota July

Use of Bioengineering Techniques for Revegetation of Riparian Areas: Colomac Mine Remediation Project, NWT

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Application of GIS and remote sensing in conservation of vernal pools

Minimum Standards for Wetland Delineations

Name: Date: Class: Louisiana: Our History, Our Home Chapter 1: Louisiana s Geography - Section 2: Natural Regions Guided Reading

Appendix P San Joaquin Valley Greenprint

Hennepin GIS. Tree Planting Priority Areas - Analysis Methodology. GIS Services April 2018 GOAL:

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted


Nikki Sacha. NRS 509 Restoration Ecology

Wetland Mapping. Wetland Mapping in the United States. State Wetland Losses 53% in Lower US. Matthew J. Gray University of Tennessee

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

Data Dictionary for Potential Conservation Area Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Steve Pye LA /22/16 Final Report: Determining regional locations of reference sites based on slope and soil type. Client: Sonoma Land Trust

Technical Drafting, Geographic Information Systems and Computer- Based Cartography

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

The Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative Conservation Goals

Baseline Estuarine-Upland Transition Zone

Lesson 9 and 10: Final Project. by Diana Jo Lau

Karr J.R. and D.R. Dudley Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Manager 5:55-68.

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

A Small Migrating Herd. Mapping Wildlife Distribution 1. Mapping Wildlife Distribution 2. Conservation & Reserve Management

NREL, Intro to GIS for Wind Energy Siting for IGERT Wind NSF

Least-Cost Transportation Corridor Analysis Using Raster Data.

Ecological Patterns and Processes in Ghost Tree Islands of the Everglades

Effects of input DEM data spatial resolution on Upstream Flood modeling result A case study in Willamette river downtown Portland

Biodiversity Blueprint Overview

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Conservation and Recovery of Ione Endemic Plants: Mapping the Ione Plant Community

Lecture 4. Spatial Statistics

ICAN Great Lakes 2010 Workshop

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

DST MODEL SUPPORT SPATIAL DATA AND WATER RIGHTS INFORMATION. Tim Minor, Desert Research Institute

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

p of increase in r 2 of quadratic over linear model Model Response Estimate df r 2 p Linear Intercept < 0.001* HD

Classifying Access on Whitewater Wildlife Management Area Callahan Unit using GIS

USE OF RADIOMETRICS IN SOIL SURVEY

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

Sprague River Basin Restoration Post Project Evaluations: Lessons Learned and Future Applications

APPENDIX PHASE 1 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK

LAB EXERCISE #4 Modeling Connectivity

COLUSA BASIN WATERSHED ASSESSMENT. Final. Prepared by: H. T. Harvey & Associates. In Collaboration With:

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

GIS-Based Sediment Quality Database for the St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC): Overview Presentations and Demonstration

Noel M. Estwick College of Agriculture and Human Sciences, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, Texas

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Environmental. Plan Update. By Jodie Pavlica

Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study in the Upper and Middle Susitna Basin Study Plan Section 11.5

Landscape Planning and Habitat Metrics

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

COMMON GIS TECHNIQUES FOR VECTOR AND RASTER DATA PROCESSING. Ophelia Wang, Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas

Resilient Landscapes Fund

Getting to know GIS. Chapter 1. Introducing GIS. Part 1. Learning objectives

Finding Hot Spots in ArcGIS Online: Minimizing the Subjectivity of Visual Analysis. Nicholas M. Giner Esri Parrish S.

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Land Use MTRI Documenting Land Use and Land Cover Conditions Synthesis Report

Project Leader: Project Partners:

Field Survey for Laramie Columbine. (Aquilegia laramiensis) In the Rawlins Field Office

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued)

SPATIAL ANALYSIS. Transformation. Cartogram Central. 14 & 15. Query, Measurement, Transformation, Descriptive Summary, Design, and Inference

Phase One Development of a Comprehensive GIS for the Mentor Marsh and its Proximal Watershed

Regional Plan 4: Integrating Ecosystem Services Mapping into Regional Land Use Planning

GIS Spatial Statistics for Public Opinion Survey Response Rates

1:30 2:00 Tangible Examples of NVC Uses from Monitoring, Mapping, and Habitat Modeling. (Todd Keeler- Wolf, ESA Panel)

Transcription:

WILLAMETTE VALLEY WET-PRAIRIE RESTORATION MODEL WHAT IS A WILLAMETTE VALLEY WET-PRAIRIE Hot Spot s Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Rare plant species Less than 5% woody plant species Often dominated by Tufted Hairgrass and found in Oak Savannah Seasonally wet Inclusions of vernal pools High plant diversity Flood plain and lower elevation valley terraces Hydric soils 1

IMPORTANCE OF WET-PRAIRIES Hot Spot s Historically covered a large portion of the Willamette Valley Habitat for rare and imperiled species i.e. Nelson s Checkermallow, Bradshaw s Lomatium, Willamette Daisy. Provide important ecological services Impoverished, fragmented, and blinking out of existence Templates for ecosystem recovery CURRENT STATUS OF WET-PRAIRIE Hot Spot s Less than 1% of the 1850 Willamette Valley wet-prairie remains intact today Wet-prairie habitat is a priority for restoration by State, Federal, and Nongovernmental organizations Restoration efforts are currently actively in progress on both private and public lands 2

RESEARCH QUESTIONS Hot Spot s What areas in the Willamette Valley eco-region provide various levels of suitable opportunities for wet-prairie restoration? Are there discernible landscape patterns in the GIS model that show suitable wet-prairie restoration areas? Is there a visual correlation between the placement of existing wet-prairie mitigation projects and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the GIS wetprairie restoration model? How many acres in each class does the restoration model identify as suitable for wet prairie restoration? METHODS Hot Spot s Data Acquisition Report Data Selection Evaluation 3

DATA ACQUISITION Hot Spot s County Soils Rare Plants Land Ownership Historic Vegetation Current Wetlands Stream/Rivers Flood Plain State Line Wetlands Land Use Cites Major Highways Mitigation Banks WV Eco-regions boundary Hydrologic Units County Borders Anadromous Fish Wildlife DATA SELECTION Hot Spot s Primary Data Layers County Soils Rare Plants Land Ownership Historic Vegetation Current Wetlands Land Use Secondary Data Layers Cites Major Highways Mitigation Banks WV Eco-regions boundary 4

GEOPROCESSING (6) Hot Spot s Standard Protocol Applied to All Data Layers Select by Attribute to identify records needed for the analysis Export to separate feature class Union to clip of Willamette Valley Ecoregion Add field to attribute table and use field calculator to assign value 0 or 1 Polygon-to-Raster Conversion Reclassify GEOPROCESSING HYDRIC SOILS GEOPROCESSING (1) 5

GEOPROCESSING CURRENT WETLANDS (2) GEOPROCESSING HISTORIC VEGETATION (3) 6

GEOPROCESSING RARE PLANTS (4) GEOPROCESSING LAND USE (5) 7

GEOPROCESSING LAND OWNERSHIP (6) FINAL GEOPROCESSING STEPS Hot Spot s Weighted Sum, Add all six layers Assign weights of each layers Select SUM as weighting measurement Use Times function to remove cities and highways from model analysis Reclassify Raster Using Field calculator in the attribute table we generated acres field for number of acres per class Convert Raster to Vector in order to perform analyses 8

ASSIGNING PRIORITY Hot Spot s Layer Name Weighted Value Ownership 1 Land Use 2 Hydric Soils 3 Rare Plant Species 4 Historic Vegetation 4 Current Wetlands 5 FINAL OVERLAY Hot Spot s 9

ANALYSIS HOT SPOT GETIS-ORD Hot Spot s ANALYSIS HOT SPOT GETIS-ORD Hot Spot s High-Low Clustering Report ( General G) 10

ANALYSIS CLUSTER AND OUTLIER MORANS I Hot Spot s ANALYSIS CLUSTER AND OUTLIER MORANS I Hot Spot s Spatial Autocorrelation Report (Morans I) Moran's Index: 0.156152 Expected Index: -0.000009 Variance: 0.000000 z-score: 483.637900 p-value: 0.000000 11

CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s What areas in the Willamette Valley eco-region provide various levels of suitable opportunities for wet-prairie restoration? Mid to Southern Valley Are there discernible landscape patterns in the GIS model that show suitable wet-prairie restoration areas? Is there a visual correlation between the placement of existing wet-prairie mitigation projects and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the GIS wet-prairie restoration model? How many acres in each class does the restoration model identify as suitable for wet prairie restoration? CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s 12

CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s What areas in the Willamette Valley eco-region provide various levels of suitable opportunities for wet-prairie restoration? Are there discernible landscape patterns in the GIS model that show suitable wet-prairie restoration areas? Yes. Clustering and hot spot analysis showed these patterns. Is there a visual correlation between the placement of existing wet-prairie mitigation projects and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the GIS wet-prairie restoration model? How many acres in each class does the restoration model identify as suitable for wet prairie restoration? CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s 13

CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s What areas in the Willamette Valley eco-region provide various levels of suitable opportunities for wet-prairie restoration? Are there discernible landscape patterns in the GIS model that show suitable wet-prairie restoration areas? Is there a visual correlation between the placement of existing wet-prairie mitigation projects and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the GIS wet-prairie restoration model? Yes. Mitigation banks appeared to be visually correlated. How many acres in each class does the restoration model identify as suitable for wet prairie restoration? 14

CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s CONCLUSIONS Hot Spot s What areas in the Willamette Valley eco-region provide various levels of suitable opportunities for wet-prairie restoration? Are there discernible landscape patterns in the GIS model that show suitable wet-prairie restoration areas? Is there a visual correlation between the placement of existing wet-prairie mitigation projects and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the GIS wet-prairie restoration model? How many acres in each class does the restoration model identify as suitable for wet prairie restoration? 734,560 acres in the top three classes. 15

FUTURE DIRECTIONS Hot Spot s Conduct a formal aerial photo investigation to eliminate unsuitable areas Develop a methodology to validate model though field observations Perform a random sampling of visits to potential sites indicated by the analysis Add flood plain layer to analysis Select a fourth field hydrologic unit to do a more detailed analysis of how well the model performs QUESTIONS? Hot Spot s 16

SOURCES City Boundaries - Geographic Information Services Unit, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT); Highways Earth Systems Institute; Land Cover Northwest Habitat Institute; Mitigation Banks Oregon Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Soils Natural Resource Conservation Service - http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/; Willamette Valley Ecoregion World Wildlife Fund; Historic Vegetation Oregon Natural Heritage Program; Willamette Valley Wetlands Oregon Natural Heritage Program; and Rare Plants Oregon Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 17