Proton Polarimetry for the EIC

Similar documents
Measurement of the Proton Beam Polarization with Ultra Thin Carbon Targets at RHIC

P-Carbon CNI Polarimeter Operation Experience

Commissioning of RHIC p-carbon CNI Polarimeter 1 H. Huang 1, I. Alekseev 2, G. Bunce 1, A. Deshpande 1, D. Fields 3, K. Imai 4, V. Kanavets 2, K. Kuri

Tagging with Roman Pots at RHIC. Proton tagging at STAR

EICUG Working Group on Polarimetry. Elke Aschenauer BNL Dave Gaskell Jefferson lab

Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009

New DAQ for the HJET polarimeter at RHIC

A Helium-3 polarimeter using electromagnetic interference. Nigel Buttimore

Ion Polarization in RHIC/eRHIC

Consideration for polarization in FCChh. V. Ptitsyn (BNL)

The Gluon Spin Contribu1on to the Proton Spin

RHIC AND ITS UPGRADE PROGRAMS

Christine Aidala Columbia University Transversity 2004, Trento June 14, 2004

Polarized Proton Acceleration at the J-PARC Accelerator Complex

RHIC pc CNI Polarimeter: Experimental Setup and Physics Results

Recent transverse spin results from STAR

The Electron-Ion Collider

RHIC upgrades and capabilities for the next decade. Wolfram Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory

Siberian Snakes and Spin Manipulations. From controlling spin to taming snakes.

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

RHIC OPERATIONAL STATUS

Hall A Compton Calorimeter G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University

RHIC - the high luminosity hadron collider

The low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter at the JLab EIC

Precision Polarimetry at JLab, 6 GeV Era G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University

Møller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen

Future prospects of di-jet production at. forward rapidity constraining Δg(x) at low x in. polarized p+p collisions at RHIC

Highlights from RHIC Spin Program

Calorimetry in QGP studies at RHIC

Longitudinal Double Spin Asymmetry in Inclusive Jet Production at STAR

Møller Polarimetry in Hall A and Beyond

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

EIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary

EIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary

ELIC Design. Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators. Jefferson Lab. Second Electron-Ion Collider Workshop Jefferson Lab March 15-17, 2004

Studying Evolution with Jets at STAR. Renee Fatemi University of Kentucky May 28 th, 2015

Spin Filtering at COSY - First Results

Spin Physics at RHIC. Particle Physics Phenomenology at KEK March 2, 2004 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)

First results of W ± boson production in high-energy polarized p+p collisions at RHIC at BNL

The Underlying Event at s = 500 GeV at STAR

Nucleon Spin Structure Longitudinal Spin of the Proton. HUGS Summer School Jefferson National Laboratory June 2, 2011 Lecture 5

Polarimetry in Hall A

Outline. Introduction of spin dynamics. RHIC polarized proton 250GeV development. Conclusion

Search for an electric dipole moment with polarized beams in storage rings

Photons in the universe. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

1. Polarimetry Strategy 2. Møller Polarimeter 3. Compton Polarimeter 4. Summary

Physics with Tagged Forward Protons and Results from Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Quarkonium Production at J-PARC

Contributions to our Understanding of TMDs from Polarized Proton Collisions at STAR

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 6 Oct 2008

Outline: Introduction and Motivation

Der Silizium Recoil Detektor für HERMES Ingrid-Maria Gregor

POLARIMETRY FOR A STORAGE-RING ELECTRIC-DIPOLE-MOMENT MEASUREMENT MARIA ŻUREK FOR THE JEDI COLLABORATION

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory. UVA Nuclear Physics Seminar

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

LOLA: Past, present and future operation

Spin-Filtering Studies at COSY

5 MeV Mott Polarimeter at Jefferson Lab

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

The 2015 erhic Ring-Ring Design. Christoph Montag Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory

POLARIMETER WORKING GROUP - D.G. Crabb Department of Physics, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

Forward nucleon tagging at EIC. J.H. Lee BNL

Particle physics experiments

Calibrating the FNAL Booster Ionization Profile Monitor

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Di muons and the detection of J/psi, Upsilon and Z 0 Jets and the phenomenon of jet quenching

Measurements of the dilepton continuum in ALICE. Christoph Baumann Resonance Workshop, Austin

Transverse SSA Measured at RHIC

Study of Baryon Form factor and Collins effect at BESIII

HIRA CSI DETECTOR RESPONSE TO LOW ENERGY PROTONS

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

Unique features of linac-ring

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

THE DOUBLE-POLARIZED DD-FUSION EXPERIMENT + DETECTOR SYSTEM

Measurement of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at High Q 2

Measurement of light mesons at RHIC by the PHENIX experiment

Probing nucleon structure by using a polarized proton beam

Pulsed Neutron Interrogation Test Assembly - PUNITA

SPIN2010. I.Meshkov 1, Yu.Filatov 1,2. Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH. 19th International Spin Physics Symposium September 27 October 2, 2010

Introduction to polarimetry at HERA

Polarization of a stored beam by spin filtering

Status of Proof-of-Principle Experiment of Coherent Electron Cooling at BNL

Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling (LEReC)

Beam Polarimetry (for Future Experiments at JLab)

Electron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects. DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab)

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

Luminosity measurement in ATLAS with Diamond Beam Monitor

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Transversity experiment update

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Calibration and Monitoring Systems

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

First experiments with the polarized internal gas target at ANKE/COSY

Sea-quark spin/flavor with Drell-Yan experiments. INT Workshop Orbital Angular Momentum in QCD February 15, 2012 Yuji Goto (RIKEN)

Spin physics at the NICA D.Peshekhonov on behalf of the NICA community

Acceleration of Polarized Protons and Deuterons at COSY

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

Identification of Central Production in the π + π π + π Channel at COMPASS

Transcription:

Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting June 24-27, 2014 at Stony Brook University Proton Polarimetry for the EIC Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 1

Outline Proton Polarimetry at RHIC Discussion of systematic errors Projection to erhic 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 2

Polarizaed beams at RHIC Siberian Snakes Hydrogen Jet Polarimeter Carbon Polarimeters PHENIX STAR Spin Flipper Spin Rotators Siberian Snakes Polarized Source Tune Jump Quads Helical Partial Snake 200 MeV Polarimeter LINAC BOOSTER AGS Strong Snake RF Dipole AGS pc Polarimeter AGS Internal Polarimeter 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 3

Polarimeters at RHIC Complex Linac absolute 200 MeV polarimeter - counting of protons scattered at 12 and 16 degrees in scintillator counters - absolute Polarization measurements - every second bunch is measured AGS relative pcarbon Polarimeter - detection of 400-900 kev recoil Carbons in 96 Si strips. - monitoring of the beam polarization extracted to RHIC - a tool for beam development studies - statistical accuracy - detection of 400-900 kev recoil Carbons in 96 Si strips. - monitoring of the beam polarization extracted to RHIC δδpp 2 3% per a few minute measurement. About 4,000 measurements per RHIC run. 4 RHIC relative pcarbon Polarimeters (two per RHIC beam) - detection of 400-900 kev recoil Carbons in 72 Si strips (each polarimeter). - monitoring of polarization profiles, polarization decays, bunch by bunch and fill by fill polarization in both RHIC beams. - few 1 minute measurements per RHIC store. RHIC absolute Polarized Hydrogen Jet Target Polarimeter (measures both beams) - detection of 1-5 MeV recoil protons in 96 Si strips - the jet (target) polarization 92%. - continuous measurement of average beam polarization - statistical errors δδpp 3% per 8-hour store. Local relative polarimeters at STAR (BBC) and Phenix (ZDC) - monitoring transverse component of the polarization after rotators. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 4

Polarization Measurement Schema in the pcarbon and H-Jet Spin dependent amplitude: Rate in the detector: Beam polarization P can be measured from the production asymmetry a: If average analyzing power is known To suppress systematic errors the asymmetry is calculated as In the pcarbon we use predefine analyzing power A N (E) In the H-Jet, A N is internally measured: 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 5

Polarization in Collision Experiments Intensity and Polarizations profiles, I(x,y) and P(x,y), are needed for the analysis Gaussian Approximation: (similar for y coordinate). Average Beam Polarization (measured by polarimeter): In the pcarbon polarimeters, x- and y- profiles may be measured using moving target (vertical and horizontal, respectively). In a fixed target run, the Pmax is measured. In the H-Jet polarimeter, average beam polarization is measured. Average Polarization in experiment: (single spin) A model dependence between <P> and R: (W. Fischer and A. Bazilevsky, Phys.Rev.ST Accel.Beams 15 (2012) 041001) If the development of polarization profiles it the primary reason for the reduction of the average polarization : P 0 = P source is zero-emittance polarization. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 6

Square Root Formula L + - R Number of events in a detector: If physics, acceptance, and intensity asymmetries are uncorrelated then Exact solution a polarization asymmetry ε acceptance asymmetry λ intensity asymmetry There is no systematic errors in measurement of asymmetry aa. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 7

Possible correlation between asymmetries It was evaluated in analysis of the AGS pcarbon data: Actually δ ε, δ ±, δ LR are systematic errors in measurements of the a, ε, and λ, respectively WCM Above the δδδδ~00. 111 level, errors in calculation of average analyzing power are the only sources of polarization systematic errors. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 8

AGS p-carbon Detectors: Rate Corrections Rate corrections are non-linear effect which was not accounted by the asymmetry correlations. Rate corrections are essential only for the AGS polarimeter. Run 58731 In a single Si strip, rate per bunch is r 0.05-0.10 (depends on intensity, emittance, target, ) The Data Acquisition may take only one events per bunch. No good event may be detected even if both coincide signals are good. The measured Polarization is underestimated: In Run13, the average rate correction is 6% (for RHIC ref. runs). Uncertainty in the parameter k propagates to a ~ 1% uncertainty in the measured polarization. The parameter k may be evaluated using experimental data (separately for each detector) with accuracy about 20%: ONLINE the value of k=1 is used (consistent with previous runs) Polarization in RHIC reference runs Horizontal Polarization Profile 2012 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 9

Sources of the systematic errors in pcarbon Analyzing power AA NN EE used in data analysis. Errors in measurement of signal amplitude (e.g. due to (RF) noise) Energy Calibration Background, 1% < δδδδ<0 Energy losses in the target, 1% < δδδδ<0 Rate Corrections, δδδδ 1% 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 10

AGS pcarbon: Analyzing power For data analysis we use Analyzing Power theoretically derived from the E950 (21 GeV/c). We can measure A N (t) up to a scaling factor. Results of measurements are well reproducible. Discrepancy between theoretical and measured analyzing powers may be caused by wrong energy calibration. Measured Analyzing Power ( <P> is determined with theor. A N (t) ) Analyzing Power A N (t) 2012 Analyzing Power A N (t) 2013 Analyzing Power A N (t) 2014 For relative measurements : δδpp ssssssss /PP 22 333 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 11

Standalone measurements with FADC250. (Superimposed signal waveforms) RF noise Prompt Carbon Scattering pulse RF noise In regular measurements, signal amplitude and time are calculated in the 8-bit, 140x3 MHz WFD firmware. A simple algorithm assume a flat base time. In RHIC pcarbons we suppress RF noise by reducing cavity voltage during the measurement For AGS pcarbon, the RF noise is a problem which affects time and amplitude measurements and may corrupt the energy calibration. Improving of the RF shielding is needed. At minimum, RF noise should be monitored and properly accounted in measurements. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 12

AGS p-carbon: Energy Calibration Since A N =A N (E), energy calibration is crucial for the polarization measurement δp/p δe/e From experimental data, can find the dependence between measured time and amplitude: If t 0 is known, we can calibrate detector in a model independent way: ADC gain is calibrated using α-source 241 Am : E dep = αa Energy losses may be accounted : EE kkkkkk AA = ααaa + EE llllllll (EE kkkkkk, xx DDDD ) A dead-layer approximation: Stopping range: Dead Layer A dead-layer condition: Using MSTAR parameterization for the de/dx, we can determine t 0 and x DL from the data fit 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 13

Comments about Dead-Layer based calibration This calibration is very sensitive to small variations of the stopping power and dead-layer model. Comparison of the standard and modified calibrations t m is measured time t A is time derived from the measured amplitude Normalized stopping range L 0 (E) = L MSTAR (E) / x DL Fit function: L(E t ) L(αA) = 1 The modified stopping range L(E) = p 0 L 0 (E) + p 1 L 02 (E) fits data much better. Energy calibrations are significantly different. Better fit does not garantee better calibration. This example shows why there is a a concern about reliability of the energy calibration. More reliable method is needed. Determination of t 0 may solve the problem. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 14

Calibration using fast (punch through) protons Carbons Bethe-Bloch formula: Fast Protons The method worked well only in few channels. Results are affected by induced pulse. Extension of the WFD range may solve the problem. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 15

RHIC p-carbon: Target in Beam Ultra-thin (55 μμμμ/cccc 22 ) Carbon ribbon target thickness 30 nnnn width 10 μμμμ Beam heats up the target to glow Targets graphitize from operation Target is electrostatically attracted to the beam Mechanical stress on target, can break need replacement Material in beam is hard to control Induced charge from wake field on target ends Change to insulated ladder construction Targets are broken often Target attraction to beam can affect the results of profile measurement. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 16

Polarized Hydrogen Jet Polarimeter (H-Jet) 255 GeV/c proton beams. 6 detectors (98 channels) Ran with two beam simultaneously separated vertically by 3-4 mm dictated by the machine beam-beam requirements. Alpha-source runs were taken separately from physics runs. Full waveform was recorded for every triggered event Recoil protons were selected within energy range 1 5 MeV Recoil proton asymmetry relative to the beam and jet polarization was mesured simultaneously a Beam = A N (t) P Beam & a Jet = A N (t) P Jet P Beam = (a Beam /a Jet ) P Jet 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 17

Systematic Errors in H-Jet The Breit-Rabi polarimeter measures only polarization (96%) of atomic hydrogen. Average polarization of the jet (including molecular hydrogen) is about 92%. The admixture of the molecular hydrogen in the jet is not monitored continuously. We consider this as a biggest contribution to the systematic error of polarization measurement. Systematic errors due to background - scattering on beam gas - inelastic pp scattering can be studied using acquired data. Elastic pp Beam gas background pp 250 GeV Elastic pp + mπ Elastic pp 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 18

Plans for RHIC Run15 Upgrade of the H-Jet: New detectors: - larger acceptance - extended energy range of detected protons (0.5 9 MeV) - factor 4 effective gain in statistics New DAQ : - based on 12 bit, 250 MHz FADC250 (JLab) - expect improvement in background suppression - study for future upgrade of the p-carbon DAQ The upgrade of the H-Jet may help us to resolve some problems discussed above. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 19

erich The erhic proton beam conditions are likely similar to the current in that the bunch spacing is still 114 nsec, but shorter bunches, but reduced bunch intensity (factor 5-10) factor 10 smaller emittance resulting factor 3 smaller transverse beam size σσ xx, yy~200 μμμμ at polarimeter location. shorter bunches, σσ = 5 cccc = 170 pppp Desirable accuracy of absolute polarization measurement δδδδ PP = 2% 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 20

H-Jet at erich For reduced beam intensity, statistical accuracy of measurements is expected to be about 10% per 8-hour store. very long time will be needed to achieve required statistical accuracy stability of p-carbon performance becomes very important possible solutions: o add unpolarized hydrogen jet target (factor 10 higher jet density) o new Si detectors which will be tested in RHIC Run 15 may effectively increased statistics by factor 4. Continuous molecular hydrogen component measurements has to be implemented. p-carbon at erich Rate at p-carbon detectors will be reduced by factor ~3. We may consider increasing of target thickness by factor 3. Polarization profile (transverse) measurements will still be available. To measure longitudinal polarization profile, the time resolution should be better than σσ 50 pppp. Such a resolution could be provided by FADC250. Due to noise, time resolution is constrained by a value of about σσ~ 500 pppp. Energy resolution should be of order of 10 3 since (δδδδ tt = δδδδ 2EE) It is unlikely to measure longitudinal polarization profile with existing Si detectors. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 21

3 He 2+ beam at erich Yousef Makdisi, EIC14, March 20, 2014 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 22

Summary Based on experience with proton polarimetry at RHIC, a 2% accuracy of absolute polarization measurement of proton beam at erich seems to be achievable with existing detectors, but significant improvements are needed including continuous monitoring of molecular hydrogen component in H-Jet improving of the carbon targets for RHIC p-carbon reducing and monitoring of the RF noise reliable energy calibration for p-carbon detectors upgrading of the DAQ It is expected that p-carbon polarimeters can be used for relative polarization measurements of the 3 He 2+ beam. More study is needed to find a solution for absolute polarization measurement of the 3 He 2+ beam. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 23

Backup 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 24

Absolute Proton Beam Polarimeter at 200 MeV The polarimeter is based on the elastic proton-carbon scattering at 16.2 degree angle, where analyzing power is closed to 100% and is measured with a high accuracy. Inelastic protons background is suppressed by 41 mm Cu absorber The high rate inclusive 12 degree polarimeter is calibrated using the 16.2 degree measurements. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 25

AGS pcarbon Polarimeter (Run 2013 configuration) Every detector consists of 12 Si strips. Right Left Carbon target foils: Thickness: 27 nm Width: 50 and 125 µm (Vertical) 75 and 125 µm (Horizontal) outer inner The polarimeter is employed for 1. Monitoring of the polarization extracted to the RHIC 2. Monitoring the polarization in the beam development studies. A regular measurement (40M events) takes few minutes and allows to determine the polarization with statistical accuracy of about 2-3%. About 4000 measurements per RHIC run. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 26

AGS pcarbon: Polarization Measurements Event selection Ramp Fixed Target Moving Target (Profile meas.) Polarization flips at integer values of GGγγ 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 27

AGS pcarbon: Analyzing power For data analysis we use Analyzing Power theoretically derived from the E950 (21 GeV/c). We can measure A N (t) up to a scaling factor. Results of measurements are well reproducible. Discrepancy between theoretical and measured analyzing powers may be caused by wrong energy calibration. Measured Analyzing Power ( <P> is determined with theor. A N (t) ) Analyzing Power A N (t) 2012 Analyzing Power A N (t) 2013 Analyzing Power A N (t) 2014 For relative measurements : δδpp ssssssss /PP 22 333 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 28

RHIC pcarbon Polarimeters 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 29

Target in Beam Beam heats up the target to glow Targets graphitize from operation Target is electrostatically attracted to the beam Mechanical stress on target, can break need replacement Material in beam is hard to control Induced charge from wake field on target ends 2014.06.27 Change to insulated ladder EIC Users construction Meeting 30

Polarization Profile Intensity Significant polarization profiles are observed RR = σσ II 2 σσ PP 2 0.1 0.2 Polarization in units of intensity σσ xx,yy 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 31

Polarization Decay Polarization losses are correlated to acceleration emittance profile Polarization P (%) injection Provide experiments with PP = PP 0 + dddd dddd tt R = RR 0 + dddd dddd tt Profile R Typical values: dddd dddd = 1%/h ddrr dddd = 5%/h 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 32

Fill Pattern Raw asymmetry per bunch Confirm bunch fill pattern reliably Blue beam PP Averaged over all measurements in a fill PP Example Fill 17370 Yellow beam PP PP 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 33

The H-jet polarimeter includes three major parts: polarized Atomic Beam source (ABS), scattering chamber, and Breit-Rabi polarimeter. The polarimeter axis is vertical and the recoil protons are detected in the horizontal plane. The common vacuum system is assembled from nine identical vacuum chambers 50 cm diameter, which provide nine stages of differential pumping each at 1000 l/s Flip jet polarization every 300 sec The Jet beam is focused to 6 mm FWHM so it sees the full beam polarization profile Thickness: 1.2 x10 12 atoms / cm 2 Jet polarization ~ 92% 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 34

Running conditions (2013) 255 GeV/c proton beams. 6 detectors (98 channels) Ran with two beam simultaneously separated vertically by 3-4 mm dictated by the machine beam-beam requirements. Alpha-source runs were taken separately from physics runs. Full waveform was recorded for every triggered event Recoil protons were selected within energy range 1 5 MeV Recoil proton asymmetry relative to the beam and jet polarization was mesured simultaneously a Beam = A N (t) P Beam & a Jet = A N (t) P Jet P Beam = (a Beam /a Jet ) P Jet 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 35

Analyzing Power Used for polarization measurements pp- CNI 24 GeV: PRD 79, 094014(2009) 31 GeV: Preliminary 100 GeV: PLB 638 (2006) 450 250 GeV: Preliminary Average Analyzing Power in Run 13: 255 GeV Variations of the measured value of A N are less than 1% 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 36

Polarization measurement in the H-Jet in Run 13 Preliminary Analysis: Fills 17201 17324 (Run13 Lattice) Fills 17328 17601 (Run12 Lattice) Fills 17328 17601 (Run12 Lattice) 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 37

Systematic Errors in the H-Jet Measurements Jet Polarization: there are 2 hydrogen components in the jet: - atomic with (measured) polarization P BR 96% - molecular (unpolarized) The admixture of molecular hydrogen was measured to be ε 3% but, but systematic errors of this measurement is not well known. The average polarization P jet = (1- ε) P BR should be used in analysis Background: r ~ 5% is background level For Jet asymmetry α=0. For beam asymmetry α is unknown and may be as large as 1 (e.g for beam gas protons). (some previous experimental estimates gave α 0) In ONLINE analysis the value of P jet = 92% was used. 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 38

Calibration methods used in HJet EE GGGG = 3.183 MeV EE AAAA = 5.486 MeV α-particles from 241 Am and 148 Gd (α, x DL ) high energy (low amplitude) prompt particles (t 0 ) geometry based calibration (t 0 and α* ) 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 39

Estimation of background effect. For elastic pp-scattering: z-profile of the jet (smeared by Si strip size) is approximated by : Background may be expected to be the same in all strips strip s The method is not verified yet! Two methods for background subtraction - from the fit - average background The peak position is associated with well known (from geometry) energy. In such a calibration t 0 may be determined with accuracy of about 200 ps, and proton energy may be calibrated with accuracy better than 2% By product detector geometry may be aligned. α-particles and prompt indicated more complicated background 2014.06.27 EIC Users Meeting 40