Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME

Similar documents
Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Determination of Off-Odor Compounds in Drinking Water Using an SPME Device with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), gas chromatography, microextraction

Date 02/24/96 Page 1 Revison 4.0 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8020/8015 (MODIFIED) GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS (GRO)

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Application. Gas Chromatography February Introduction

Analyzing Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC Headspace with Valve-and-Loop Sampling

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC

GC/MS Application Note

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Method of determination of phtalates in spirituous beverages by gaschromatography/mass

Volatile Hydrocarbons (VH) in Waters by GC/FID

Determination of BTEX in Cigarette Filter Fibers Using GC-MS with Automated Calibration

Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

TOTALLY INNOVATIVE MULTIMODE AUTOSAMPLER NEW KONIK ROBOKROM Laboratory Gas Generators An Overview +8 OPERATIONAL MODES MAIN FEATURES

PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)

METHOD 8030A ACROLEIN AND ACRYLONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Residual solvents analysis using an Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC system

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Automated Sample Preparation of Headspace Standards Using the Agilent 7696 WorkBench

IMPCA METHANOL REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS

Simultaneous dual capillary column headspace GC with flame ionization confirmation and quantification according to USP <467> Application Note

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

BUTYL ALCOHOL in urine by GC-FID Code GC05510

Determination of Volatile Substances Proof of Food Adulteration

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Screening of Pesticide Residues in Water by Sequential Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction-Thermal Desorption with GC/MS

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

Accurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID. Application Note.

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note

The Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using the Agilent G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

-xt. -xt SYSTEM. Specifications for PAL-xt Systems. Valid for PAL-xt System models only. Prep and Load Platform

METHOD 8032A ACRYLAMIDE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

METHOD 5000 SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Determination of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene in River Water by Solid-Phase Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

The Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC-VUV and Static Headspace

IMPCA METHANOL REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

Determination of VOC in Artificial Runway by Multiple Headspace Extraction-GC/MS. Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry APPLICATION.

Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology

Atlantic RBCA. Guidelines for Laboratories. Tier I and Tier II Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methods

Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

GAFTI Analytical method for ISO/TS 16179:2012 Detection and Determination of Organotin Compounds in Footwear and Apparel Materials by GC-MS

Spring 2010 updated March 24 Determination of Aromatics in Gasoline by Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry: Comparison of Grades and Brands

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler


ENVIRONMENTAL analysis

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Author. Abstract. Introduction

TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC16110

Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC15010

Static Headspace Blood Alcohol Analysis with the G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

Fast Analysis of USP 467 Residual Solvents using the Agilent 7890A GC and Low Thermal Mass (LTM) System

GC/MS: A Valid Tool for Soil Gas Hydrocarbons Speciation

The Focus Robotic Sample Processor as a Tool for the Multiple Analysis of Samples using Complementary Techniques

FORMIC ACID in URINE by GC/MS-headspace - Code GC74010

USP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument

METHANOL REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS

Product Brief. - Hydrocarbons alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, dienes including natural gas, refinery gas, liquified petroleum gas

Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

Simultaneous Estimation of Residual Solvents (Isopropyl Alcohol and Dichloromethane) in Dosage Form by GC-HS-FID

Date 10/22/97 Page 1 Revision 4.1 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8000/8100 (MODIFIED) DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Analysis of Metals, Halides, and Inorganic Ions Using Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography

Certified BTEX in Unleaded Gas Composite

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

METHYLISOBUTYLKETONE (4-methyl-2 pentanone) IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC10510

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION FOR TRACE ANALYSIS OF BENZENE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

Transcription:

Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME Application Note Environmental Author Giordano Vassalli Sezione Protezione Aria Introduction Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) isomers are monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which have a moderate solubility in water (benzene: 1600 mg/l; toluene: 500 mg/l; ethylbenzene and xylenes: 160 mg/l). They are constituents of mineral oil products and are used in many industrial processes as solvents. Moreover, these compounds are the major water-soluble constituents of petroleum derivatives (gasoline). During tire burning, benzene and toluene are the two components, which have the highest exhaust emission factor.

Instrumentation and Conditions GC with FID Detector temperature: 300 C Work-range: 10 Injection technique: Agilent 1093 (SPI) on-column injector Injection temperature: 290 C, isothermal, equipped with a 0.75 mm SPME Insert Autosampler with automated SPME and needle heater Column: Agilent CP-Sil 5CB (p/n: CP8770) Temperature: 30 C, hold 4 min, 4 C/min to 130 C, hold 1 min Carrier: Fiber: Helium 5.0 @ 3.0 ml/min 75 µm Carboxen/PDMS Extraction/analysis times: pre-incubation time 5 min@ 400 rpm (35 C), 24 min extraction time @ 250 rpm, 4 min desorbtion, 1 min bake-out time @ 300 C Working mode: Reagents and Materials PVOC Mixture 3 in MeOH Chlorobenzene neat 99.9 % (ISTD) Methanol, GC Grade Water, Suprapur Grade 20 ml Headspace screw vial ND18 Silicone blue/ptfe white screw cap Sodium chloride, RPE grade Description SPME extraction is performed in the headspace to improve extraction sensitivity. Samples are injected without performing a septum purge. Calibration standards: Into different 20 ml calibration vials weigh approximately 6 ± 0.05 g of salt and 15 ml of suprapur water. Prepare an internal standard (ISTD) solution at 2.5 µg/ml in water. 25 µl of this solution is transferred to each calibration vial (final concentration in the water: 4.156 µg/l). Then prepare the calibration standards in these vials by adding different 2 volumes of a calibration standard solution in water at 2.5 µg/ ml (prepared from the PVOC Mixture 3 ampoule) of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, p-xylene and o- xylene. Close the vials and shake vigorously for 30 sec to dissolve the salt. Table 1 shows a short recapitulation of the procedure for this first preparation. Table 1. Short STD preparation procedure Vial # Name Water NaCl ±0.05 +ISTD ISTD (ug/l) +Cal. sol. BTEX (µg/l) 1 Blank 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 0 Blank 2 STD 1 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 5.0 0.83 3 STD 2 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 5.0 0.83 4 STD 3 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 10.0 1.67 5 STD 4 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 15.0 2.49 6 STD 5 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 20.0 3.32 7 STD 6 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 25.0 4.16 Sample treatment: Samples are collected in the precleaned 20 ml vials, and closed with the correct septa and caps. During sampling, all air bubbles must be eliminated from the vial. If the analysis is performed within fourteen days, it is not necessary to preserve the samples (by adding 1 drop of HCl 1:1). A sampling blank collection on-site is recommended using suprapur water. Open the vials, remove 5 ml of water and discard it, add 6 ± 0.05 g of salt, and 25 µl of the ISTD solution at 2.5 µg/l. To avoid a loss of more volatile molecules, it is better to perform these additions as quickly as possible. Shake vigorously for 30 sec and analyze. Table 2 illustrates a short sample preparation procedure. Table 2. Short sample preparation procedure. Vial # Name Water sampled Residual water NaCl ± 0.05 +ISTD ISTD (µg/l) 11 Sampling blank 20 ml 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 12 Sample A 20 ml 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 13 Sample B 20 ml 15 ml 6 g 25 4.16 Results and Discussion The GC/FID spectrum for a standard and a sample are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1. Injection of a standard Figure 2. Injection of polluted water 3

Linear, 6-point calibration curves for the BTEX compound are shown below. Calibration Curve m/p-xylene 2.500 Calibration Curve BENZENE 2.000 y = 0.71075x + 0.00544 R 2 = 0.99717 1.500 y=2.05496x-0.00441 R 2 = 0.99791 1.200 1.200 Calibration Curve o-xylene 1.200 Calibration Curve TOLUENE 0.900 y = 0.92537x - 0.0058 R 2 = 0.99929 1.200 Calibration Curve ETHYLBENZENE y=1.11415x-0.01647 R 2 = 0.99691 1.200 With the same fiber, more than 300 injections were done without loss in performance. Table 3 shows the variations in retention time for the components studied. 0.900 y=0.93033x-29 R 2 = 0.99848 1.200 Table 3. Retention times Benzene Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene m/p- o- RT (min) 7.63 12.54 16.04 17.13 17.58 18.62 CV (%) < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4

The sampling error on the volume remaining in the vial (15 ml) was assessed after the removal of 5 ml from the full, plain vial: a test conducted on 21 vials gave an average of 15.1383 ml and a CV of 0.92 %, which can be considered sufficiently accurate. For the extraction of ISTD, a series of blanks doped with differents ISTD concentrations was analyzed (Table 4). Table 4. Chlorobenzene area variation ISTD (µg/l) Samples % RSD 1.154 53 9.1 4.156 17 6.7 11.543 45 7.3 The determination of the minimum detection limit (MDL) was calculated using the procedure published in Chapter One of SW-846 (EPA): a minimum 3 replicates of a matrix spiked with analytes at a concentration 3-5 times the estimated MDL (= S/N between 2.5 to 5.0) are injected and, for each compound, standard deviations are calculated and multiplied with the one-sided 99 % t-test. After measuring four replies of a standard at 0.21µg/L, the following MDLs were obtained (Table 5). Table 5. MDLs from SW-846 Compound MDL (µg/l) Benzene 0.056 Toluene 0.065 Ethylbenzene 0.043 m/p- 0.040 o- 0.075 Table 6. Precision and accuracy results (IN-and-OUT calibration range). Conclusion Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p- o- Average (µg/l) 1.66 1.73 1.69 3.77 1.74 Recovery (%) 99.3 103.3 101.4 113.1 104.2 RSD (%) 6.9 2.8 5.5 6.4 6.4 Average (µg/l) 3.52 3.46 3.52 3.64 4.07 Recovery (%) 105.7 103.9 105.7 109.3 (122.3) Average (µg/l) 4.82 4.99 4.96 4.79 4.71 Recovery (%) 96.4 99.8 99.2 95.8 94.2 Average (µg/l) 6.89 6.80 6.90 6.78 6.81 Recovery (%) 103.5 102.1 103.6 101.8 102.3 Average (µg/l) 8.28 8.24 8.30 8.29 8.00 Recovery (%) 99.5 99.1 99.8 99.7 96.2 Global results illustrate that SPME-extraction is an excellent method to extract BTEX from water samples. Due to the fiber s properties, it is very important to find and adjust correctly extraction / injection parameters. With such molecules, any cross-contamination between samples was demonstrated, even at higher concentrations. It is possible to increase the sensitivity for toluene (x1.6), ethylbenzene (x4.5), m/p-xylene (x9) and o-xylene (x4) by using a DVB-CAR-PDMS fiber. However, with such fiber, benzene is less sensitive (factor x0.7). Use of DVB-CAR- PDMS fiber will be of interest in the analysis of more highboiling substances (such as trimethylbenzenes) with a loss in the lighter ones (methyl tert-butyl ether, benzene). Precision and accuracy from two independent quality control laboratories were investigated, although not all samples were situated in the calibration range (see Table 6). www.agilent.com/chem This information is subject to change without notice. Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2010 Published in UK, September 29, 2010 SI-01251