Optimizing Conditions for Volatiles Analysis

Similar documents
Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

New Approaches to the Development of GC/MS Selected Ion Monitoring Acquisition and Quantitation Methods Technique/Technology

ANNE JUREK. Abstract: soils and are found. in can also with GC/MS. poster. in series. option for. There are problems. analytes. in methanol.

Fast USEPA 8270 Semivolatiles Analysis Using the 6890/5973 inert GC/MSD with Performance Electronics Application

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Introduction to Capillary GC. Page 1. Agilent Restricted February 2, 2011

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Introduction to Capillary GC

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Cerno Bioscience MassWorks: Acquiring Calibration Data on Agilent GC/MSDs

The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note

Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

U.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYTICAL METHODS INTENDED FOR CIPAC COLLABORATIVE STUDY

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Understanding Gas Chromatography

Agilent G3212 GC-APCI Source

Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software

The end of. mass-speculation. MS Certified Vials Pre-cleaned and certified vials for mass spectrometry

Introduction to Capillary GC

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

VOC Analysis of Water-Based Coatings by Headspace-Gas Chromatography

Uncontrolled Copy. SOP-060 Chromatography, Tune Evaluation and Troubleshooting. Table of Contents. 1. Principle... 3

Determination of VOCs by USEPA Method 8260 with Extended Dynamic Range using Fast, Sensitive Capillary GC/MS

Agilent ESI and APCI sources: for polar to non-polar compounds

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

A Newly Approved ASTM Standard For Analysis of Thiophene in Benzene Using a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD)

Meeting Challenging Laboratory Requirements for USEPA Method 8270 Using a Highly Sensitive, Robust, and Easy-to-Use GC/MS

Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application

Natural Rock Sample Manual

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 27. Chem 4631

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

METHOD 8430 ANALYSIS OF BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER AND HYDROLYSIS PRODUCTS BY DIRECT AQUEOUS INJECTION GC/FT-IR

EGASUS. 4D GCxGC TOFMS. Delivering the Right Results

NATURAL ROCK SAMPLE. Performance Monitoring Accessory for the RAD7 User Manual

Analyst Software. Automatic Optimization Tutorial

METHOD 8000A GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Application Note 032

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1826 PAGE: 1 of 18 REV: 0.0 DATE: 03/30/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN WIPE SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Pittcon P

Lab 3 Guide: Gas Chromatography (GC) (Sept 8-14)

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

METHOD 8033 ACETONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH NITROGEN-PHOSPHORUS DETECTION

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY. Pre-Lab Questions

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Determination of Volatile Substances Proof of Food Adulteration

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

MassHunter TOF/QTOF Users Meeting

Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Fast Determination of Impurities in Propane- Propylene Streams Using a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD) and a New Capillary.

TO-15 Checklist Determination of VOCs in Air by GC-MS

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Application Note # Performance of Method 8270 Using Hydrogen Carrier Gas on SCION Bruker SCION GC-MS

Highly Sensitive and Rugged GC/MS/MS Tool

Analysis of Total PCBs and PCB Congeners and Trans-nonachlor in Fish by Gas Chromatography/ Negative Chemical Ionization Single Ion Mass Spectrometry

High-Speed Environmental Analysis Using the Agilent 7500cx with Integrated Sample Introduction System Discrete Sampling (ISIS DS)

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (GC)

NON-METHANE ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER (NMOC Method 25)

Analysis of Sulfur-Containing Flavor Compounds By GC/MS With A PFPD

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Volatile Organic Compounds in Every Day Food

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Author. Abstract. Introduction

MassHunter METLIN Metabolite PCD/PCDL Quick Start Guide

Low-Level Sulfur Compounds in Beer by Purge and Trap with a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD)

Agilent 6400 Series Triple Quadrupole Users Workshop. MH QQQ Users workshop 2/21/2014 1

1. Prepare the MALDI sample plate by spotting an angiotensin standard and the test sample(s).

Expectations for GC-MS Lab

UltiMetal Plus Advanced Chemistry for Stainless Steel Surface Deactivation

USP<467> residual solvents

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), gas chromatography, microextraction

Innovative Thermal Desorption From Agilent Technologies. Vivek Dhyani Application Chemist

Maximizing Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry Productivity with the Agilent StreamSelect LC/MS System

Agilent MassHunter Quantitative Data Analysis

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Secrets of GC Column Dimensions

Agilent MassHunter Quantitative Data Analysis

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

for Acclaim Mixed-Mode HILIC-1 Column

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

HPLC Praktikum Skript

Exercise in gas chromatography

AlphaLab Gaussmeter Model VGM -- Instructions

Introducing the Agilent 7000A QQQ-MS for GC Sunil Kulkarni Product Specialist Agilent Technologies

Transcription:

July 2016 SPEXCertiPrep.com/ECS Optimizing Conditions for Volatiles Analysis by Mark A. Ferry GC/MS Technical Consultant MFerry@SPEX.com A publication by Environmental Consulting & Supplies a Division of

Optimize July 2016 A publication by ECS, a division of SPEX CertiPrep 203 Norcross Ave. Metuchen, NJ 08840 Phone: 732-549-7144 Email: crmsales@spexcsp.com Web: www.spexcertiprep.com/ecs Copyright 2016 SPEX CertiPrep

OPTIMIZING CONDITIONS FOR VOLATILES ANALYSIS Over the years, many configurations for Volatile systems have come and gone. Now virtually all labs run a narrow bore column and split/splitless injection port. Thus, we will address only this configuration. The most common narrow bore columns are 30-60 meters long, 0.18 mm or 0.25 mm ID. These are the considerations with this configuration. The connection from the Purge and Trap to the split/splitless injector is CRITICAL. Over the years, we have come to the following conclusion: For 5890 GCs (regardless of the MSD involved), you are better off using the direct insertion technique whereby the transfer line of the purge and trap is butt-connected to a piece of 0.32 mm ID fused silica which is then inserted directly into the injector, thereby leaving the split/splitless pneumatics intact. This configuration not only leads to better chromatography but reduces exposure of the analytes to the stainless steel in the injector. For 6890 GCs (regardless of the MSD involved), you are better off using the slice and dice technique whereby the transfer line from the purge and trap concentrator is teed into the stainless steel lines of the split/splitless injector. Also, be sure to use a gold inlet seal and a 1 or 2 mm injection port liner for 5890s and either a 2 or 4 mm liner for 6890s. For 5890s - desorb flows between 25-30 ml/minute are ideal whereas with the 6890 performance is usually better at 30-35 ml/minute. Pressure pulsing usually provides good results, with initial head pressures of 25-30 psi for 1 minute and then a constant flow of 0.4-1.2 ml/minute depending on your column and MSD. For 0.18 mm ID columns a flow of 0.4 ml/minute is a good starting point while for 0.25 mm ID columns a flow of 1.0 ml/minute is a good starting point. Monitor Source pressure. The pressure should always be in the low 10^-5 to high 10^-6 range with this configuration. Monitor and record the source pressure with the column flow set to what it typically is in your analytical run and keep a record of it. If problems occur, note the changes in source pressure. Desorb with shorter desorb times. I recommend a 2 minute desorb time for virtually all VOA applications. Optimizing Purge and Trap Conditions Regardless of how your GC/MS is configured, you need to optimize purge and trap conditions. At this point in time, virtually all discussions about Volatiles analyses relate to purge and trap concentrators using the VOCARB 3000 trap. Standard VOCARB 3000 recommended conditions for most 500, 600 and 8000 series Volatile GC/MS methods are as follows: Sample temperature: ambient (aqueous) or heated (non-aqueous) Purge: 11-15 minutes at 40-45 ml/minute Dry purge: Desorb preheat: Desorb: Bake: 2-4 minutes 220 C 2 minutes at 230 C 7 minutes at 260 C July 2016 Optimize 3

To optimize the system, the analyst can vary any of the above parameters based on the types of analytes in the method and the configuration employed. The following illustrates important considerations: Purge Conditions You must consider both flow rate and time. Both parameters will have DRAMATIC effects on recoveries of certain analytes. Generally 11-15 minutes at 42-45 ml/minute often works best if the method requires monitoring of Volatile gases. Longer times and higher flows help the more water soluble analytes, and shorter times and lower flows help the more Volatile analytes. You will usually obtain better results by purging at a lower flow rate for a longer time rather than cranking the purge flow really high and reducing the purge time. The use of Dry Purge (generally 2-4 minutes is sufficient) is critical to controlling water vapor buildup on the trap. 2. For Tekmar systems, it s usually best to desorb Preheat at 5 C below the desorb temperature so that the trap will be fully heated before cycling the 6 port valve. 3. Desorption efficiency is highly dependent on the desorb flow rate. Low desorb flows of 10-25 ml/minute are usually not as efficient as high flows of 25-40 ml/minute but you should try various desorb flows to see what works best. 4. Generally, the higher the desorb temperature, the sharper the peaks will be. However, thermal degradation of certain species can occur (a good starting point is 230 C). Bake conditions Key point: Bake does not affect chromatography except to minimize cross-contamination and carryover. My recommendation is to bake for 7 minutes. Use Bake Gas Bypass with a 60 second delay if your system is so equipped (unless you have a single-spot Purge and Trap with the Auto-Drain feature in which case you do not use Bake Gas Bypass). This way, the bake flushes pure helium through the trap (heated to its maximum temperature) and reduces carryover. Longer bake times will reduce trap lifetime, but whether the trap lasts 2 months or 3 is not nearly important as keeping the system as Desorb Conditions Key points: 1. Desorption efficiency ranks at the top of the list as to what affects chromatography so pay close attention to desorb flow, desorb time and desorb temperature! Desorption efficiency is the term that expresses how well the analytes are transferred from the trap to the GC inlet. The goal is to focus the analytes in a tight band on the trap and then transfer them in that same tight band to the GC inlet. A tight band of analytes into the inlet leads to the best possible separation and peak shape. 4 Optimize July 2016 SPEXCertiPrep.com/ECS

clean as possible. General Guidelines for Volatiles A good ICC is one that meets the following criteria: 1. LINEARITY: Has low RSD s (relative standard deviations) for most or all compounds. This means the system is linear throughout your working calibration range which translates directly into accuracy of data. 2. SENSITIVITY: Has adequate response at the low standard to meet the stated detection limit. The push with all state and federal methodologies (especially 500 series drinking water and most 600 series wastewater) is for lower MDL s, so being able to detect low levels is critical. 3. REPRODUCIBILITY: In addition to being linear and sensitive, the system must be reproducible. After you run your multi-level curve, your daily (or 12 hour) check standard should also yield low RSD s-indicating minimal drift from your ICC. A properly optimized system should stay linear for at least two weeks. If you need to recalibrate more frequently than once every week, your system is not optimized. The following guidelines will help you keep your system linear and sensitive: Make sure the system is tuned reproducibly each day. Keep your relative ratios and peak widths of ions 69, 131 and 219 in your tune file constant from the time you set up your initial calibration curve to your day to day continuing calibration check. I recommend making a hard copy of a Spectrum Scan and Profile Scan when running your initial curve. Each day, try to attain the same ratios, peak widths and sensitivity. Keeping your system tuned each day will go a long way in keeping your system linear. Make sure the Purge & Trap is cleaned thoroughly. The type of system you have will determine how you clean it, but in any case, you should flush the system out with clean helium for 2 hours each 24 shift prior to running anything. Monitor spot-to-spot variations in flow rates of your autosampler. If you have an automatic sampler that has different ports for each sample (i.e. ALS-2016), you should measure the flow rate from each spot, because the valve in these systems sometimes gets out of alignment from use, and can vary the spot-to-spot purge flow rate, which would cause reduced linearity and reproducibility. If the flow varies by more than 4 ml/minute, the valve should be realigned or replaced. Monitor the areas of the internal standards and adjust the electron multiplier as necessary. Record the internal standard areas you obtain when you run your initial curve, and increase or decrease the multiplier during the subsequent weeks in order to keep those internal standard areas as close as possible to what they were when you ran the initial curve. In other words, keep the ISTD areas from drifting. Adjust the EM setting daily to make sure they stay constant. Daily monitoring and adjustment of electron multiplier voltage is frequently necessary and essential to staying linear for extended periods of time. Beware of active sites. Unless you are running drinking water samples, it s inevitable that sample contamination will create active sites to some extent. Periodic methanol flushing lines and valves is helpful, but replacement of the 6 port valve and sample lines on the Purge and Trap on an annual basis is a good idea. Beware of excess acidity which can cause 2-Chloroethyl-vinyl ether to break down. Beware of excessively high desorb temperatures which can cause certain analytes to break down on the trap during desorb. Be sure you are using the correct EM voltage. Sometimes, you need to increase it above what you used in manual tune, depending on your configuration. Use the following table as a starting point (Note: these are just guidelines, the overall quality of your curve determines the proper EM setting). Most laboratories aim for about 2 million counts of ion 69 in manual tune (assuming Enviroquant Version G1701BA or equivalent) Configuration 0.25 mm ID capillary column w/split i.p.: 0.18mm ID capillary column w/split i.p.: Usual EM Voltage Guide Manual Tune +200 volts Manual Tune +300 volts July 2016 Optimize 5

Once you get a good ICC, record the area of the first internal standard and shoot for the EM voltage that gives you that same area and you should be able to reproduce your results! Be sure you are using the correct A/D sampling rate. This stands for Analog to Digital setting and is a measure of how many scans the system will average before storing a single spectrum point. When you view a TIC (Total Ion Chromatogram), you are actually seeing a big connect the dots picture. Each point on the TIC is one spectrum, and each spectrum is actually the average of several scans. The number of scans in a TIC is a function of 3 things: 1. The scan range being used (typically 35-300 amu). 2. The model of MSD. The newer 5973 and 5975 models are faster than the 5971 and 5972 s which in turn scan faster than the 5970 MSD. 3. The A/D setting. A/D is expressed as an exponent of 2; i.e. 2^1=2; 2^2=4, etc. The larger the resulting A/D the more scans get averaged before a point is stored and thus you collect less data points. Use the sampling rate that gives you 10-20 scans across the peak. If are you getting less than 10 scans, that means you need to lower the A/D to increase the scans. Conversely, if you are getting more than 20 scans across the peak you need to raise the A/D to decrease the number of scans. Be sure you are using the correct threshold. This is the all-or-nothing level. Abundance counts of ions below this level register as 0; abundance counts of ions above it get stored with their corresponding abundance in that scan. You should set it low enough to see all minor ions at your detection level. Here s how to set the Threshold: you need to do a test run in which you set the Threshold to 0 in your method. Run a low level standard (let s say 2.0 ppb for 8260 or 0.5 ppb for 524). You will get a chromatogram with a noisy baseline (this is expected). Look on your Quant report and determine the 10 poorest responding compounds. Then do a spectrum scan at the apex of each of those 10 analytes whose secondary or tertiary ions are at low percentages (i.e. <20% of the base peak). Obtain a tabulation of the abundances. Find the smallest result. Set your threshold to 1/2 the abundance of the smallest qualifier ion in one of your 10 smallest peaks in your low level standard. This is a good setting which enables you to see all minor ions and eliminates as much background noise simultaneously. Consider using pressure pulsing followed by constant flow. Pressure pulsing is where the head pressure is raised at the time of desorb then lowered to facilitate constant flow throughout the balance of the run. Example using a 0.18 mm ID column with a 2 minutes desorb: You set the head pressure to 30 psi for 2 minutes to match the desorb time. After 2 minutes you set the program for constant flow thereafter. Benefits of this setup 1. The high head pressure during desorb helps focus the water/methanol/analyte slug coming from the Purge and Trap during desorb into a tight band entering the column. That is a natural follow up to optimizing desorb conditions to which I referred earlier. 2. The constant flow for the balance of the run directly translates to constant ion source pressure in the MSD. Constant ion source pressure is extremely helpful in maintaining pump integrity and keeping the GC/MS stable over long periods of time. 6 Optimize July 2016 SPEXCertiPrep.com/ECS

Keys to Optimizing the Quantitation Routine For you DOS users with Enviroquant here are my tips on optimizing the compound list: 1. Retention time window: I recommend 1 minute. That is ample time for the integrator to properly integrate. 2. Integration parameters: Use 5000 area counts for most compounds. Start threshold = 0.200; stop threshold 0.000. Data point sampling = 1. Smoothing box checked. Detection filtering = 5 points. Don t forget to set your MDL cutoff in Edit Quant Report Options. 3. Curve fit: Average of Response factors. 4. Subtraction method: Use no abundance subtraction. I ve found that the other methods are needed only if poor chromatography exists. 5. Identify by: Use Combination Q value and retention time. This means that if there are multiple hits in the RT window, the system will choose the correct one based on both Q value (i.e. how close the ion ratios are in the peak as compared to the ID file) and retention time. This is the best way. 6. Relative response: 50% Relative (NOT absolute). This may seem wide (and indeed it is) but I can always delete false positives. The last thing we want to have happen is a false negative. It is better to widen the window and delete a mishit, than to have too narrow a window and miss a compound that is present! Use as many qualifier ions as possible. If the compound produces 4 qualifier ions that have >20% response, then enter them all. Use ions throughout the entire mass range rather than using several ions with similar masses. Modify the global parameters listed above on a compound by compound basis for the most effective quantitation. The compound list is the heart of accurate quantitation and qualification for target analysis; do your best to keep it optimized each day! Create a customized integration parameter file for any compound which cannot be accurately integrated by the default parameters. Questions or comments on this or any issue of OPTIMIZE may be emailed to the author, Mark Ferry, at MFerry@SPEX.com. Key points to maintaining an effective Compound List: ALWAYS have at least two ions for each compound. Once you set up a good compound list, DON T start cutting out ions if the system fails to locate the compound. Find out why and correct. In other words, don t butcher your compound list; instead constantly fine-tune and update it as your chromatographic and spectral changes warrant. Update RT s and Q values daily. You can do this automatically in Update Levels. Also update reference spectra daily. July 2016 Optimize 7

US Address: SPEX CertiPrep, Inc. 203 Norcross Avenue Metuchen, NJ 08840 Tel: 1-800-LAB-SPEX Fax: 732-603-9647 E-mail: CRMSales@spexcsp.com Web: www.spexcertiprep.com UK Address: SPEX Europe 2 Dalston Gardens Stanmore Middlesex, HA7 1BQ UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 8204 6656 Fax: +44 (0) 20 8204 6654 E-mail: SPEXEurope@spex.com Web: www.spexeurope.com Go Green! SPEX CertiPrep supports saving our natural resources. Please Recycle!