The wave front set of a distribution

Similar documents
Introduction to Microlocal Analysis

Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Sobolev Spaces. Chapter 10

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final

Microlocal Analysis : a short introduction

Notes on Distributions

Solutions to Problem Set 5 for , Fall 2007

Diffraction by Edges. András Vasy (with Richard Melrose and Jared Wunsch)

EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

CHAPTER 1. Preliminaries Basic Relevant Algebra Introduction to Differential Geometry. By Christian Bär

LECTURE 3 Functional spaces on manifolds

2. Function spaces and approximation

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS METHODS

Singularities of affine fibrations in the regularity theory of Fourier integral operators

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ).

Traces, extensions and co-normal derivatives for elliptic systems on Lipschitz domains

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

Reminder on basic differential geometry

Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography

Outline of the course

The theory of manifolds Lecture 2

GEOMETRIA ZBIORÓW ZER PÓL KONFOREMNYCH

Lagrangian submanifolds and generating functions

Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Problem: A class of dynamical systems characterized by a fast divergence of the orbits. A paradigmatic example: the Arnold cat.

LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

DEVELOPMENT OF MORSE THEORY

Takao Akahori. z i In this paper, if f is a homogeneous polynomial, the correspondence between the Kodaira-Spencer class and C[z 1,...

Algebras of singular integral operators with kernels controlled by multiple norms

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

Math 147, Homework 5 Solutions Due: May 15, 2012

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003

Hölder regularity estimation by Hart Smith and Curvelet transforms

Lecture 6. Differential Equations

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

Lectures on. Sobolev Spaces. S. Kesavan The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai.

POINTWISE BOUNDS ON QUASIMODES OF SEMICLASSICAL SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN DIMENSION TWO

Continuity of the fundamental operations on distributions having a specified wave front set (with a counterexample by Semyon Alesker)

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012

SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2.

Lecture Notes Math 632, PDE Spring Semester Sigmund Selberg Visiting Assistant Professor Johns Hopkins University

Coordinate Systems and Canonical Forms

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

274 Microlocal Geometry, Lecture 2. David Nadler Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Math 215B: Solutions 1

Distributions, Frobenious Theorem & Transformations

A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

LECTURE 3: SMOOTH FUNCTIONS

A Walking Tour of Microlocal Analysis

An Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010

Unbounded operators on Hilbert spaces

INTEGRATION ON MANIFOLDS and GAUSS-GREEN THEOREM

Lecture 11 Hyperbolicity.

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM

Chapter 16. Manifolds and Geodesics Manifold Theory. Reading: Osserman [7] Pg , 55, 63-65, Do Carmo [2] Pg ,

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

Euler Equations: local existence

UNIFORM APPROXIMATION BY b HARMONIC FUNCTIONS

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

The theory of manifolds Lecture 3. Tf : TR n TR m

Lecture 2: Some basic principles of the b-calculus

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

PHASE TRANSITIONS: REGULARITY OF FLAT LEVEL SETS

Differential Geometry Exercises

LECTURE 7, WEDNESDAY

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY

There are five problems. Solve four of the five problems. Each problem is worth 25 points. A sheet of convenient formulae is provided.

FOURIER TRANSFORMS OF SURFACE MEASURE ON THE SPHERE MATH 565, FALL 2017

Implicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces

CHAPTER 5. Microlocalization

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

arxiv: v4 [math.dg] 22 May 2018

225A DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY FINAL

Math 215B: Solutions 3

Notes on symplectic geometry and group actions

4 Divergence theorem and its consequences

Linear Analysis Lecture 5

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

ISSN: [Engida* et al., 6(4): April, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116

COMPLEX ANALYSIS HW 8

Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem

The theory of manifolds Lecture 3

Pseudodifferential calculus on a singular foliation 1 2

Geometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves

COMPLEX ANALYSIS AND RIEMANN SURFACES

Transcription:

The wave front set of a distribution The Fourier transform of a smooth compactly supported function u(x) decays faster than any negative power of the dual variable ξ; that is for every number N there exists a constant C N such that û(ξ) C N (1 + ξ ) N. (1) On the other hand, if the Fourier transform of a distribution with compact support satisfies the estimate (1) then this distribution is actually induced by a smooth function. Therefore, the estimate (1) can be viewed as a characteristic property for smoothness. The singular support of a distribution tells us where the singularities of a distribution lie. The wave front set gives more precise description of singularities; it tells us not only at what points a singularity occur, but it also indicates the directions in the dual space from which the singularities are coming; that is, in what directions the estimate (1) does not hold. Let us start with some definitions. A set V R n \{0} is called a conic set if, together with any point ξ, it contains all the points tξ where t > 0. A conic set is completely determined by its intersection with the unit sphere S n 1 in R n. By a conic neighborhood of a point ξ R n \ {0} we mean an open conic set that contains ξ. Let u E be a distribution in R n with compact support. Its Fourier transform is a smooth function. We define the set Σ(u) R n \ {0} by saying that ξ Σ(u) if there exists a conic neighborhood V of ξ such that the estimate (1) holds in V for all N. It follows immediately from the definition that Σ(u) is a closed conic set. Notice that the distribution u is induced by a smooth function if and only if Σ(u) =. Proposition 1. Let u E (R n ) and φ C (R n ). Then Σ(φu) Σ(u). Proof. First, let φ C0. Let ξ Σ(u), and let V be a conic neighborhood of ξ where the estimate (1) holds. We take a smaller conic neighborhood, V of ξ the closure of which lies in V, and we will prove the estimate (1) for the product φu in V. First, there exists a constant c such that, for every η V, the closed ball of radius c η, centered at η, lies in V. In fact, the distance between V S n 1 and the complement of V is positive. Choose c to be a positive number that is smaller that that distance. The inequality ζ η < c η implies (ζ/ η ) (η/ η ) < c; so (ζ/ η ) V, and ζ V because V is conic. The Fourier transform of φu equals the convolution of Fourier transforms, φu(η) = (2π) n ˆφ(η ζ)û(ζ)dζ. (2) The Fourier transform of u has an upper bound û(ζ) C(1 + ζ ) M (3) for some number M. The integral in (2) can be broken into I 1 + I 2 = +. ζ η c η 1 ζ η >c η

In the first integral, ζ V, so û(ζ) C N (1 + ζ ) N C N (1 + η) N because ζ (1 c) η. Therefore, I 1 C N(1 + η ) N ˆφ(η) dη. (4) To estimate the integral I 2, we notice that ζ η c η implies and, therefore, ζ η ζ η ζ 1 ζ η, c ζ η c ζ. (5) c + 1 The estimates (1) and (3) imply that, for any choice of N, I 2 C (1 + ζ η ) N M n 1 (1 + ζ ) M dζ. ζ η c η The integrand in the last formula is bounded by (1 + ζ η ) N (1 + ζ η ) M n 1 (1 + ζ ) M C 1 (1 + η ) N (1 + ζ ) n 1 when ζ η c η (see (5).) Therefore, The last estimate, together with (4), implies I 2 C 2 (1 + η ) N. φu(η) C 3 (1 + η ) N. This proves the Proposition in the case φ C0. If a function φ is not compactly supported then one can find a function φ C0 that coincides with φ in a neighborhood of suppu. Clearly, φu = φ u. Q.E.D. Corrolary 2. Let u D (R n ), and let φ 1, φ 2 C0 (R n ). Suppose that φ 2 (x) 0 when x supp(φ 1 ). Then Σ(φ 1 u) Σ(φ 2 u). Proof. Let U be a neighborhood of supp(φ 1 ) such that φ 2 (x) 0 when x U, and let V be a smaller neighborhood of supp(φ 1 ): supp(φ 1 ) V ; V U. Let χ(x) be a smooth function such that χ(x) = 1 when x V and χ(x) = 0 when x U. We define a function { χ(x)/φ2 (x), if x U; ψ(x) = 0, if x U. 2

Clearly, ψ(x) is a smooth, compactly supported function, and φ 1 = ψ(φ 2 u). Q.E.D. Let Ω be an open set in R n, and let u D(Ω). For a point x Ω, we define Σ x (u) = Σ(φu); φ C 0 (Ω), φ(x) 0. As an intersection of closed conic sets, Σ x (u) is a closed conic set. Proposition 3. Let Γ be a conic neighborhood of Σ x (u), u D (Ω). Then there exists a neighborhood U of x such that Σ(φu) Γ for every function φ(x) C 0 (U). Proof. The set K = S n 1 \ Γ is a closed subset of the unit sphere. For every point ω K there exists a function φ ω C 0 (Ω) such that φ ω (x) 0 and a neighborhood of ω does not intersect with Σ(φ ω u). These neighborhoods cover K. One can find a finite number of them that still cover K. Therefore, there exists a finite number of functions φ j C 0 (Ω) such that φ j (x) 0 and K ( j Σ(φ j u)) =. Because Γ is a conic set, we conclude j Σ(φ j u) Γ. Let U be a neighborhood of x that all φ j s do not vanish in U. By Corrolary 2, Σ(φu) Σ(φ j u) for every function φ C 0 (U). Therefore, Σ(φu) Γ. Q.E.D. One can interpret Proposition 3 in the following way: Σ x (u) is the limit of Σ(φu) when supp(φ) {x} and φ(x) 0. Now, we are ready to define the wave front set of a distribution. Definition. The wave front set of a distribution u D(Ω) is defined as W F (u) = {(x, ξ) Ω (R n \ {0}) : ξ Σ x (u)}. It is a simple exercise to derive from the definition of the wave front set and from Proposition 3 that the projection of W F (u) on Ω is exactly the singular support of u. Example 4. Let P k R n be the k-dimensional co-ordinate plane x k+1 = = x n = 0. By x I will denote the collection (x 1,..., x k ), and x is the collection of remaining coordinates, so x = (x, x ). For a function u(x ) C (P k ), we will compute the wave front set of the distribution u(x )δ(x ). This distribution acts on a test function in the following way u(x )δ(x ), ψ = u(x )ψ(x, 0)dx. The support of this distribution is {x = (x, 0) : x supp(u)}. Choose a point x 0 = (x 0, 0) from this set. Let φ be a compactly supported smooth function such that φ(x 0 ) 0. The Fourier transform of the distribution φu(x )δ(x ) equals F (ξ, ξ ) = u(x )φ(x, 0)e x ξ dx. Let Γ k = {(ξ, ξ ) 0 : ξ = 0}. On the whole cone Γ k, the function F (ξ) is constant (the integral of u(x )φ(x, 0).) For every neighborhood of x 0, one can find a function φ 3

supported in that neighborhood such that the integral of u(x )φ(x, 0) does not vanish. So, by Proposition 3, Γ k Σ x0 (uδ(x )). On the other hand, if ξ 0 Γ k then ξ C ξ for every point ξ = (ξ, ξ ) from a certain conic neighborhood Γ of ξ 0. Therefore, for every N, F (ξ) C N (1 + ξ ) N C N(1 + ξ ) N when ξ Γ, and ξ 0 Σ x0 (uδ(x )). We conclude that W F (u(x )δ(x )) = {(x, x ; ξ, ξ ) : x supp(u), ξ = 0}. (6) Transformation of the wave front set under a diffeomorphism. Let Φ : Ω Ω be a diffeomorphism, and let u D (Ω ). acts according to the formula The distribution v = Φ u v, φ = u, Ψ (y) φ(ψ(y)) where Ψ = Φ 1 and Ψ is the absolute value of the Jacobian of Ψ. In particular, if u is a distribution with compact support then ˆv(ξ) = u, Ψ (y) e iψ(y) ξ = u, a(y) Ψ (y) e iψ(y) ξ where a(y) is a smooth compactly supported function that equals 1 identically on supp(u). The support of a(y) can be made as close to supp(u) as one wishes.to simplify notations, we set b(y) = a(y) Ψ (y). By the definition of the Fourier transform of a distribution, ˆv(ξ) = û, F 1( b(y)e iψ(y) ξ) = (2π) n û(η)b(y)e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) dydη. (7) Fix a point x 0 Ω. We will assume that the support of u lies in a ball of sufficiently small radius centered at the point y 0 = Φ(x 0 ). We also assume that the support of b(y) also lies in that ball. To make notations simpler, set x 0 = y 0 = 0. Lemma 5. Let A(y) = Ψ (y) be the Jacobi matrix of Ψ. Then Σ(Φ u) y supp(u) (A t (y)) 1 Σ(u). (8) Proof. Let ξ 0 be a point that does not belong to y suppu(a t (y)) 1 Σ(u). Then there exists a conic neighborhood Γ of ξ 0 and a conic neighborhood V of Σ(u) such that 4

A t (y)γ V = when y suppu. Let Γ be a smaller conic neighborhood of ξ 0, Γ Γ. We break the integral (7) into the sum v 1 (ξ) + v 2 (ξ) = (2π) n +(2π) n. It is easy to estimate v 2 (ξ). The function û(η) decays rapidly outside of V, so (2π) n b(y) û(η)e iyη dη V c is a smooth, compactly supported function. Therefore, after having made a substitution x = Ψ(y), one would recognize v 2 (ξ) as the Fourier transform of a smooth, compactly supported function. Thus, v 2 (ξ) decays rapidly. To estimate v 1 (ξ) we will use multiple partial integrations. Notice that D j e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) = ( η j k We introduce a first order differential operator η V η V ) Ψ k (y) ξ k e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) y j = (η A t (y)ξ) j e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ). L = j (η A t (y)ξ) j η A t (y)ξ 2 D j. (9) The denominator in (9) does not vanish when ξ Γ and η V. One has Le i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) = e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ). (10) Let ξ Γ and ξ 1. Then v 1 (ξ) = (2π) n = (2π) n V V û(η)b(y)l k e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) dydη û(η)((l t ) k b(y))e i(yη Ψ(y) ξ) dydη (11) where L t = j D j (η A t (y)ξ) j η A t (y)ξ 2. The operator (L t ) k is a differential operator of order k in y. Exercise. By induction, show that the coefficients of (L t ) k are of the form k m=0 P k+m (y, ξ, η) η A t (y)ξ 2(k+m) 5

where P k+m is a polynomial in (ξ, η) of degree k + m with smooth in y coefficients. The cones Γ and (A t (y) 1 V do not intersect, and the closure of Γ lies in Γ, so η A t (y)ξ C η, η A t (y)ξ C ξ when ξ Γ and η V. If one assumes in addition that ξ 1 then η A t (y)ξ C(1 + ξ + η ). The last estimate, the result of the exercise, and (11) imply for any k. On the other hand, v 1 (ξ) C k V û(η) (1 + ξ + η ) k dη û(η) C(1 + η ) M for some M because u is a distribution with compact support. By choosing k = N + M + n + 1, one gets the desired estimate v 1 (ξ) C(1 + ξ ) N. Q.E.D. Now, we can formulate the theorem that says how the wave front set of a distribution is transformed under a change of variables. Theorem 6. Let Ω and Ω be open domains in R n, and let Φ : Ω Ω be a diffeomorphism. The wave front set of the pull-back Φ u of a distribution u D (Ω ) is given by the following formula W F (Φ u) = {(x, ξ) Ω (R n \ {0}) : (Φ(x), (Φ (x)) t ξ) W F (u)}. (12) Before we prove theorem 6, let us discuss how to interpret it. one-form η = η j dy j on Ω is The pull-back of a so Φ η = n ξ k dx k = k=1 ξ k = n j=1 n n k=1 j=1 Φ j x k η j. The last equation can be re-written in the matrix form as Φ j x j η j dx k ; ξ = (Φ (x)) t η. (13) 6

A diffeomorphism Φ : Ω Ω gives rise to a mapping ˆΦ : T (Ω ) T (Ω): ˆΦ(y, η) = (Φ 1 (y), (Φ (Φ 1 (y)) t )η. (14) This mapping is a diffeomorphism, and it maps the zero section Ω {0} onto the zero section Ω {0}. Theorem 6 says that W F (Φ u) = ˆΦ(W F (u)). In other words, the wave front set is a correctly defined set in the cotangent bundle over a domain. One should think of Ω (R n \ {0}) as the space of non-zero covectors over Ω. Proof of Theorem 6. We start from proving the inclusion W F (Φ u) ˆΦ(W F (u)). (15) Suppose that (y, η) = ˆΦ 1 ((x, ξ)) W F (u). By Proposition 3, there exists a conic neighborhood Γ of η and a neighborhood V of the point y such that Σ(ψu) Γ = (16) for every smooth function ψ that is supported in V. Let U = Φ 1 (V ); this is a neighborhood of the point x. The equation (16) implies ξ (Φ (x) t )(Σ(ψu)), and, therefore, ξ (Φ (x ) t )(Σ(ψu)) (17) for every point x from a sufficiently small neighborhood U of the point x. Let Ũ = U U and Ṽ = Φ(Ũ). Take any function φ C 0 (Ũ) such that φ(x) 0. Let ψ(z) = φ(φ 1 (z)). Then φφ u = Φ (ψu), and by Lemma 5, ξ Σ(φΦ u) (see (17).) By the definition of the wave front set, (x, ξ) W F (Φ u), so the inclusion (15) has been established. To prove the opposite inclusion, we notice that the composition of ˆΦ and Φ 1 is the identity mapping and (Φ 1 ) Φ u = u; so the inclusion (15) written for Φ 1 is equivalent to W F (Φ u) ˆΦ(W F (u)). Q.E.D. Example 7. Let M be a k-dimensional smooth submanifold in R n. For a function u C (M) we define the distribution uδ M D (R n ): uδ M, φ = M u(x)φ(x)ds where ds is the area element in M that is induced by the Euclidean metric in R n. Let us compute W F (uδ M ). First, a point (x, ξ) may lie in W F (uδ M ) only if x M and 7

x 0 supp(u). Theorem 6 allows us to use any co-ordinate system for computing the wave front set. Let x supp(u) M. First, we take an orthogonal co-ordinate system (y 1,..., y n ), with the origin at the point x 0, with the first k co-ordinate axes lying in the tangent plane T x0 (M) to M at the point x 0, and the last n k co-ordinate axes going along its orthogonal complement. The transition from the old co-ordinate system (x 1,..., x n ) to the new one is given by the composition of a shift and an orthogonal transformation. A neighborhood of the point x 0 in M is given by equation with smooth functions F l. Notice that y l = F l (y 1,..., y k ), l = k + 1,..., n, F l (0) = 0, l = k + 1,..., n. (18) In a neighborhood of the point x 0 in R n, we introduce co-ordinates (z 1,..., z n ): z j = { yj, when j k; y j F j (y 1,..., y k ), when j > k. (19) Equations (18) imply that the Jacobi matrix ( z/ y)(0) is the identity matrix, so (19) define a diffeomorphism in a neighborhood of x 0. In that neighborhood of x 0, the manifold M is given by the equations z k+1 = = z n = 0, and the distribution uδ M acts on a function that is supported in a neighborhood of x 0 by the formula u, δ M φ = u(z )φ(z, 0)m(z )dz where z = (z 1,..., z k ), z = (z k+1,..., z n ), and m(z )dz is the area element ds written in the local co-ordinates z on M. From Example 4, we know that (x 0, ζ) W F (uδ M ) when ζ = 0. If interpreted as a point in the cotangent space T x 0 (M), it annihilates the tangent space T x0 (M). A subspace in T x 0 (M) that annihilates T x0 (M) is called the normal space to M at x 0, and it is denoted by N x0 (M). In the original co-ordinates, it is given by We conclude that N x0 (M) = {ξ R n : ξ T x0 (M)}. W F (uδ M ) = {(x, ξ) : x supp(u) M, ξ N x (M) \ {0}}. 8