Double (Concentric) Eyewalls in Hurricane Katrina at Landfall:

Similar documents
P2.37 EXTREME WINDS ASSOCIATED WITH A COLLAPSING CORE ON THE MOBILE WATERFRONT DURING THE LANDFALL OF HURRICANE KATRINA 2.

Hurricane Structure: Theory and Application. John Cangialosi National Hurricane Center

Homework 2: Hurricane Katrina. Part 1. Hurricane Katrina, August 28, 2005 Satellite Imagery

Hurricane Structure: Theory and Diagnosis

HURRICANE IVAN CHARACTERISTICS and STORM TIDE EVALUATION

Specification of Tropical Cyclone Parameters From Aircraft Reconnaissance. Andrew Cox and Vincent Cardone Oceanweather Inc.

HURRICANE FRANCES CHARACTERISTICS and STORM TIDE EVALUATION

ERTH 365 Homework #2: Hurricane Harvey. 100 points

HURRICANE CHARLEY CHARACTERISTICS and STORM TIDE EVALUATION

HURRICANE JEANNE CHARACTERISTICS and STORM TIDE EVALUATION

Impact of Assimilating Airborne Doppler Radar Velocity Data Using the ARPS 3DVAR on the Analysis and Prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008)

16D.3 EYEWALL LIGHTNING OUTBREAKS AND TROPICAL CYCLONE INTENSITY CHANGE

SMAP Winds. Hurricane Irma Sep 5, AMS 33rd Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology Ponte Vedra, Florida, 4/16 4/20, 2018

The Atlantic Hurricane Database Reanalysis Project

LECTURE #18: Hurricane Damage, Monitoring & Case Study

Hurricane Wilma Post Storm Data Acquisition Estimated Peak Wind Analysis and Storm Tide Data. December 27, 2005

30 If Vmax > 150, HSI intensity pts = 25

WEDNESDAY 30 TH AUGUST, :57 p.m. Tropical Storm Irma forms in the Atlantic. Don t let your guard down, always #Be Ready.

Lecture #18 (April 12, 2010, Monday) Tropical Storms & Hurricanes Part 3. Hurricane Floyd September 15, 1999

Frank Revitte National Weather Service. Weather Forecast Office New Orleans/Baton Rouge

KCC White Paper: The 100 Year Hurricane. Could it happen this year? Are insurers prepared? KAREN CLARK & COMPANY. June 2014

Ch. 11: Hurricanes. Be able to. Define what hurricane is. Identify the life and death of a hurricane. Identify the ways we track hurricanes.

P4.10. Kenichi Kusunoki 1 * and Wataru Mashiko 1 1. Meteorological Research Institute, Japan

Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina

P1.6 Simulation of the impact of new aircraft and satellite-based ocean surface wind measurements on H*Wind analyses

What s s New for 2009

(April 7, 2010, Wednesday) Tropical Storms & Hurricanes Part 2

Unmanned Aircraft Hurricane Reconnaissance. Pat Fitzpatrick GeoSystems Research Institute Mississippi State University Stennis Space Center branch

Hurricane Initialization Using Airborne Doppler Radar Data for WRF

Advanced diagnostics of tropical cyclone inner-core structure using aircraft observations

Hurricane Harvey: SE Texas Impacts. 10 PM CDT UPDATE Friday, August 25, 2017 Prepared by: Lance Wood

Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler Radar Data for the Advancedresearch Hurricane WRF (AHW) Model

Navigating the Hurricane Highway Understanding Hurricanes With Google Earth

A Tropical Cyclone with a Very Large Eye

Hurricane Isaac. National Weather Service. Communication Challenges and The Future. Weather Forecast Office New Orleans/Baton Rouge

Improved Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer Wind Retrievals. From Airborne Doppler Radar

GC Briefing. Weather Sentinel Tropical Storm Michael. Status at 8 AM EDT (12 UTC) Today (NHC) Discussion. October 11, 2018

The spatial contribution of translation speed to tropical cyclone wind structure

University of Miami/RSMAS

Bradley W. Klotz 1, 2 and Eric W. Uhlhorn 2. NOAA/AOML/HRD, Miami, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 16, Part Hurricane Paths. 2. Hurricane Paths. Hurricane Paths and Damage

Tropical Storms & Hurricanes Part 1. August 1992

Feel free to ask for help also, we will try our best to answer your question or at least direct you to where you can find the answer.

TROPICAL STORM HARVEY BRIEFING

Retrieving Surface Wind Directions from Neural-Net Wind Speed Retrievals in Tropical Cyclones

(Preliminary) Observations of Tropical Storm Fay Dustin W Phillips Kevin Knupp, & Tim Coleman. 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology October 8, 2009

8.1 RECENT RESULTS FROM NOAA'S HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECAST EXPERIMENT (IFEX)

Tri-Agency Forecast Discussion for August 24, 2010

A NEW SAR RETRIEVAL METHOD FOR HURRICANE WIND PARAMETERS

An analysis of storm surge attenuation by wetlands using USGS, FEMA, and NASA data

An Ensemble based Reliable Storm Surge Forecasting for Gulf of Mexico

Storm Summary for Hurricane Joaquin

Atmospheric Motions Derived From Space Based Measurements: A Look To The Near Future. James F.W. Purdom

RapidScat Along Coasts and in Hurricanes. Bryan Stiles, Alex Fore, Sermsak Jaruwatanadilok, and Ernesto Rodriguez May 20, 2015

Kimberly J. Mueller Risk Management Solutions, Newark, CA. Dr. Auguste Boissonade Risk Management Solutions, Newark, CA

Tropical Cyclone Modeling and Data Assimilation. Jason Sippel NOAA AOML/HRD 2018 WMO Workshop at NHC

Tuesday, September 13, 16

Tropical Cyclone Data Impact Studies: Influence of Model Bias and Synthetic Observations

HURRICANE NATE BRIEFING

WindSat Ocean Surface Emissivity Dependence on Wind Speed in Tropical Cyclones. Amanda Mims University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

2008 Hurricane Caravan. Daniel Noah Meteorologist National Weather Service x1 May 22, 2008

Vertical structure of the atmosphere

Current Details from the National Hurricane Center (NHC)

Hurricanes. Hurricanes are large, tropical storm systems that form and develop over the warm waters near the equator.

SLOSH New Orleans Basin 2012 Update

Severe Weather: Tornadoes and Hurricanes

Comparison of reflected GPS wind speed retrievals with dropsondes in tropical cyclones

Objectives for meeting

A Look Back at the 2012 Hurricane Season and a Look Ahead to 2013 & Beyond. Daniel Brown National Hurricane Center Miami, Florida 24 April 2013

THE ROLE PLAYED BY BLOCKING OVER THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE ON HURRICANE KATRINA

Unit 7 Section 3 Computer Lab. Part 1: OPEN OCEAN AND COASTAL IMPACTS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES

Tropical Update. 5 AM EDT Wednesday, September 6, 2017 Hurricane Irma, Tropical Storm Jose, and Tropical Storm Katia

10 years after Hurricane Charley

Hurricane KATRINA Lessons Learned for Managing Risk

P2.8 LONG-RANGE LIGHTNING APPLICATIONS FOR HURRICANE INTENSITY. Nicholas W. S. Demetriades and Ronald L. Holle Vaisala, Inc.

HURRICANE HARVEY COE Navigation BRIEFING

Derrick Herndon and Chris Velden University of Wisconsin - Madison Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies

An Assessment of the Climatology of Florida Hurricane-Induced Tornadoes (HITs): Technology versus Meteorology

Hurricane Katrina Tracking Lab

A Hurricane Outlook for the 21st Century.

Current Details from the National Hurricane Center (NHC)

Q-Winds satellite hurricane wind retrievals and H*Wind comparisons

A proposal to establish a dedicated Hurricane Model Evaluation and Improvement Project. Joseph Cione Eric Uhlhorn NOAA/Hurricane Research Division

ANALYSIS AND DETECTION OF TORNADOES ASSOCIATED WITH HURRICANE EMILY

Derrick Herndon and Chris Velden University of Wisconsin - Madison Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies

DA/Initialization/Ensemble Development Team Milestones and Priorities

The Properties of Convective Clouds Over the Western Pacific and Their Relationship to the Environment of Tropical Cyclones

Visualizing hurricanes

Forecast Challenges of the 2017 Hurricane Season and NHC Priorities for 2018

Low-end derecho of 19 August 2017

P4.1 CONSENSUS ESTIMATES OF TROPICAL CYCLONE INTENSITY USING MULTISPECTRAL (IR AND MW) SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS

STORM HISTORY FOR COLLIER COUNTY

TROPICAL STORM HARVEY COE Navigation Call - Update

General background on storm surge. Pat Fitzpatrick and Yee Lau Mississippi State University

Typhoon Maemi and Hurricane Katrina: Impacts and Aftermath. Typhoon Maemi: September 13, Typhoon Maemi Track and Characteristics

Weather Middle School Teacher Instructions and Activity

Photo by Herb Stein. Center for Severe Weather Research. Hurricane Studies. Photo by Herb Stein

Hurricane Tracking Lab

How does NASA study hurricanes? 17 August 2015, by Max Gleber

Hurricane Harvey the Name says it all. by Richard H. Grumm and Charles Ross National Weather Service office State College, PA

Transcription:

Double (Concentric) Eyewalls in Hurricane Katrina at Landfall: A Key to the Storm s Huge Size and Devastating Impact over a Three-State Coastal Region Keith Blackwell Coastal Weather Research Center University of South Alabama Pat Fitzpatrick Stennis Space Center/Mississippi State University Chris Velden and Tony Wimmers NOAA/Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) SFMR Assistance from Eric Uhlhorn NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division

Katrina made landfall with the third-lowest central pressure (920 hpa) of any U.S. hurricane, but was only labeled a category 3. Why were the winds not stronger? Hurricane Katrina making landfall along the Louisiana and Mississippi coasts, as captured in visible imagery from the NOAA-15 satellite at 6:48 am CDT, 29 August 2005 (Image courtesy of NOAA).

The color microwave imagery displays Katrina with an intense single eyewall. The storm was rapidly strengthening over the Gulf Loop Current at this time. (Image courtesy of CIMSS.)

The color microwave imagery indicates that Katrina has begun an eyewall replacement cycle as spiral bands begin to coalesce into an outer eyewall. (Image courtesy of CIMSS.)

Microwave imagery continues to indicate the development of an outer eyewall in Katrina which almost completely encircles the inner eyewall. This ongoing eyewall replacement was one factor aiding the reduction of Katrina s maximum winds from earlier. However, the development of this outer eyewall greatly increased the size of the storm. (Image courtesy of CIMSS.)

Color morphed microwave imagery of Hurricane Katrina at 7:00 am CDT, 29 August 2005 from the MIMIC (Morphed Integrated Microwave Imagery at CIMSS) system showing the double eyewall structure of Katrina as it makes landfall along the northern Gulf Coast.

Color morphed microwave imagery of Hurricane Katrina at 10:00 am CDT, 29 August 2005 from MIMIC showing continued evidence of an open double eyewall structure of Katrina as the inner eyewall crosses the Mississippi coast. Image courtesy of CIMSS.

MIMIC Microwave Loop Concentric Eyewall Structure

NOAA Aircraft Reflectivity Cross Section [Single Eyewall] (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division) NOAA Aircraft: N49RF, 1725-1818 UTC, 28 Aug 2005 (Northeast Quad)

NOAA Aircraft: N49RF, 1725-1818 UTC, 28 Aug 2005 (Northeast Quad) NOAA Aircraft Velocity Cross Section [Single Eyewall] (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division)

NOAA Aircraft Radar Reflectivity (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division) Concentric Eyewall Structure NOAA Aircraft: N43RF, 1023 UTC, 29 Aug 2005

NOAA Aircraft: N43RF, 1000-1040 UTC, 29 Aug 2005 (East Quad) NOAA Aircraft Reflectivity Cross Section [Double Eyewall] (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division)

NOAA Aircraft Velocity Cross Section [Double Eyewall] (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division) NOAA Aircraft: N43RF, 1000-1040 UTC, 29 Aug 2005 (East Quad)

Katrina Dropsondes NOAA Dropsondes North of 28 N between 90.5 and 87.5 W. Source: NOAA/Hurricane Research Division

MIMIC Microwave Loop Max Dropsonde Winds (mph) below 2000 ft

Dropsonde Mean Wind Profiles Eyewall wind maxima are found near 500 m (1600 ft) elevation. Non-eyewall wind maxima are found much higher (closer to 1000 m [3000 ft]) (From Franklin et al., 2003 and TPC/NHC webpage) From TPC/NHC and AOML/ HRD

Dropsonde Max Wind (mph) (sfc-2000 feet) Overlaid on Microwave Satellite Imagery MIMIC Microwave Image Max Pascagoula Dropsonde Wind (mph) below 2000 ft

Pascagoula Dropsonde Profile in Outer Eyewall (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division)

Surface Wind Estimates in the Outer Eyewall over Water Per Franklin et al. 2003, NHC Operational Procedures, and Franklin personal communication (March 2007), a surface (10 m) sustained wind can be estimated from the Pascagoula dropsonde (g052116016) by averaging the winds over a 150 m layer centered on the following levels: Method 1) 90% of 700 hpa wind 90% of 126 mph at 700 hpa (9435 feet) = 113 mph (113.4 mph) at 10 m. Method 2) 80% of 850 hpa wind 80% of 130 mph at 850 hpa (4000 feet) = 104 mph at 10 m. Method 3) Midpoint percent of the lowest 150 m of wind reports in dropsonde 76.5% of 134 mph at 285 m (961 feet) = 103 mph at 10 m. These estimates represent sustained 1 minute wind estimates. Are winds of approximately this strength found in any other dataset in the outer eyewall?

Yes! NOAA aircraft Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) data shows an outer surface wind maximum up to 105 mph south of Pascagoula, directly within the outer eyewall and at nearly the same time as the Pascagoula dropsonde. Outer Eyewall Wind Maximum Pascagoula HRD s H*Wind profile shows no such outer wind maximum. Courtesy of Eric Uhlhorn (NOAA/AOML/HRD), Pat Fitzpatrick (Stennis/Miss State Univ.), and Ben Jelley (WorldWinds Inc.) H*Wind

Reconstructions of Katrina s wind field generally show only a single eyewall storm (i.e., a storm with only one RMW) making landfall. For instance, HRD s H*Wind analysis program fails to show a double eyewall structure in Katrina at landfall.

Neither does the Corps of Engineer s IPET simulation Also, notice the likely erroneous decrease in radius of maximum wind (RMW) and storm size near landfall in Mississippi (similar to H*Wind). From IPET

We believe the IPET simulation (and possibly H*Wind) was confusing inner and outer eyewalls, resulting in rapid fluctuations in RMW near landfall. These RMW fluctuations appear unrealistic. From IPET

Conclusions The massive size of Katrina s wind field was a product of concentric (double) eyewall structure at and before landfall on the northern Gulf Coast. The strengthening of the outer eyewall reduced the maximum winds in the inner eyewall, thus allowing a 920-928 hpa storm to display only category 3 sustained winds at landfall. This double eyewall structure is not portrayed in most (if not all) storm re-constructions of Katrina s wind field at landfall. Virtually the entire Mississippi Coast suffered the impact of at least one eyewall in Katrina. Some locations received two eyewall impacts. The microwave satellite imagery shows potential for identifying regions in the hurricane containing strong sustained winds and gusts. (based on comparisons with dropsondes, radar, SFMR, and some surface observations [not shown]). Microwave and MIMIC imagery can provide an important operational nowcast tool for identifying eyewalls and regions of strong surface winds within hurricanes.

Slides Not Used, but kept for potential questions.

South of Pearlington MS Dropsonde in Outer Eyewall (Courtesy Hurricane Research Division)

Surface Wind Estimates in the Outer Eyewall over Water Per Franklin et al. 2003, NHC Operational Procedures, and Franklin personal communication (March 2007), a surface (10 m) sustained wind can be estimated near Pearlington/Waveland from the dropsonde (g051926111) by averaging the winds over a 150 m layer centered on the following levels: Method 1) 90% of 700 hpa wind 90% of 128 mph at 700 hpa (9017 feet) = 115 mph at 10 m. Method 2) 80% of 850 hpa wind 80% of 135 mph at 850 hpa (3567 feet) = 108 mph at 10 m. Method 3) Midpoint percent of the lowest 150 m of wind reports in dropsonde 83.8% of 121 mph at 95 m (301 feet) = 101 mph at 10 m. These estimates represent sustained 1 minute wind estimates. Thus, mid-to high category 2 sustained winds were likely in the outer eyewall in the vicinity of Pearlington/Waveland shortly after 7 am CDT. Slidell NWS Doppler also supports winds near the speeds shown in outer eyewall dropsondes. What were the gusts in this outer eyewall?