PHASE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOURCE TIME FUNCTION MODELED BY STOCHASTIC IMPULSE TRAIN

Similar documents
Phase Spectrum Modeling to Simulate Design Earthquake Motion

Stochastic Processes. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno

Lecture 15. Theory of random processes Part III: Poisson random processes. Harrison H. Barrett University of Arizona

Name of the Student: Problems on Discrete & Continuous R.Vs

ECE 650 Lecture #10 (was Part 1 & 2) D. van Alphen. D. van Alphen 1

Stochastic Structural Dynamics Prof. Dr. C. S. Manohar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

STAT/MATH 395 A - PROBABILITY II UW Winter Quarter Moment functions. x r p X (x) (1) E[X r ] = x r f X (x) dx (2) (x E[X]) r p X (x) (3)

Stochastic Processes- IV

SEISMIC WAVE PROPAGATION. Lecture 2: Fourier Analysis

Photomultiplier (PMT) basic elements

Chapter 6 - Random Processes

ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 6 Stochastic Process

STRONG MOTION PREDICTION ON ROCK SURFACE BY SUPERPOSED EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRA

PHASE ANGLE PROPERTIES OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTIONS: A CRITICAL LOOK

EMPIRICAL STUDY ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL GROUD MOTIONS

Name of the Student: Problems on Discrete & Continuous R.Vs

Chapter 2. Random Variable. Define single random variables in terms of their PDF and CDF, and calculate moments such as the mean and variance.

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II

Communication Signals (Haykin Sec. 2.4 and Ziemer Sec Sec. 2.4) KECE321 Communication Systems I

13.42 READING 6: SPECTRUM OF A RANDOM PROCESS 1. STATIONARY AND ERGODIC RANDOM PROCESSES

The sound generated by a transverse impact of a ball on a circular

Relevance Vector Machines for Earthquake Response Spectra

Algorithms for generating surrogate data for sparsely quantized time series

ELEMENTS OF PROBABILITY THEORY

Applied Probability and Stochastic Processes

Week 1 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Distributions A

Research Engineer, Technology Center, Taisei Corporation, Yokohama Japan

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II Bugs/queries to HT 2011 For hints and answers visit dwm/courses/2tf

Problem Sheet 1 Examples of Random Processes

Fourier Transform for Continuous Functions

Stochastic Processes. Monday, November 14, 11

Correlator I. Basics. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 Digitization Sampling. D. Anish Roshi

Random Fatigue. ! Module 3. ! Lecture 23 :Random Vibrations & Failure Analysis

Conditional simulation of spatially incoherent seismic ground motion using Gaussian process models.

Gaussian, Markov and stationary processes

Discrete Distributions

AN EVALUATION METHOD OF MODAL DAMPLING AND ITS APPLICATION BASED ON A FVT OF CABLE STAYED BRIDGE

P 1.5 X 4.5 / X 2 and (iii) The smallest value of n for

Prediction of landslide-induced debris flow hydrograph: the Atsumari debris flow disaster in Japan

Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Processes I

Northwestern University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

WHITE NOISE APPROACH TO FEYNMAN INTEGRALS. Takeyuki Hida

E[X n ]= dn dt n M X(t). ). What is the mgf? Solution. Found this the other day in the Kernel matching exercise: 1 M X (t) =

Lecture 1: Brief Review on Stochastic Processes

TIME-VARIANT RELIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SERIES SYSTEMS WITH LOG-NORMAL VECTOR RESPONSE

2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008

Fourier Analysis Linear transformations and lters. 3. Fourier Analysis. Alex Sheremet. April 11, 2007

Frequency Based Fatigue

System Simulation Part II: Mathematical and Statistical Models Chapter 5: Statistical Models

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Approach to Random Vibration Theory (RVT) for NGA-East

Soil Profile Confirmation through Microtremor Observation

A STRATEGY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF BUILDING STRUCTURES UNDER BASE EXCITATIONS

Alternate Methods for Construction of Design Response Spectrum

RECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES

SITE EFFECTS IN HIROSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN DURING THE 2001 GEIYO EARTHQUAKE OF MARCH 24, 2001

MEDE2500 Tutorial Nov-7

Probability and Statistics

ANALYTICAL STUDY ON RELIABILITY OF SEISMIC SITE-SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATED FROM MICROTREMOR MEASUREMENTS

Correlation, discrete Fourier transforms and the power spectral density

Feature extraction 2

System Identification & Parameter Estimation

NAME: 11 December 2013 Digital Signal Processing I Final Exam Fall Cover Sheet

Safety Envelope for Load Tolerance and Its Application to Fatigue Reliability Design

A Probability Primer. A random walk down a probabilistic path leading to some stochastic thoughts on chance events and uncertain outcomes.

TLT-5200/5206 COMMUNICATION THEORY, Exercise 1, Fall 2012

RELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES

BMIR Lecture Series on Probability and Statistics Fall, 2015 Uniform Distribution

Chapter 6: Random Processes 1

EXAM. Exam #1. Math 3342 Summer II, July 21, 2000 ANSWERS

output dimension input dimension Gaussian evidence Gaussian Gaussian evidence evidence from t +1 inputs and outputs at time t x t+2 x t-1 x t+1

PROOF COPY [EM/2004/023906] QEM

SHOCK AND VIBRATION RESPONSE SPECTRA COURSE Unit 6B. Notes on the Fourier Transform Magnitude

Likelihood Function for Multivariate Hawkes Processes

Stochastic Processes

Effects of data windows on the methods of surrogate data

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Examining the Adequacy of the Spectral Intensity Index for Running Safety Assessment of Railway Vehicles during Earthquakes

Empirical Mean and Variance!

A.1 THE SAMPLED TIME DOMAIN AND THE Z TRANSFORM. 0 δ(t)dt = 1, (A.1) δ(t)dt =

Earthquake predictability measurement: information score and error diagram

Topic 3: Fourier Series (FS)

7 The Waveform Channel

Ching-Han Hsu, BMES, National Tsing Hua University c 2015 by Ching-Han Hsu, Ph.D., BMIR Lab. = a + b 2. b a. x a b a = 12

Non-stationary Ambient Response Data Analysis for Modal Identification Using Improved Random Decrement Technique

[Read Ch. 5] [Recommended exercises: 5.2, 5.3, 5.4]

2. SPECTRAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

System Simulation Part II: Mathematical and Statistical Models Chapter 5: Statistical Models

Lecture Notes 7 Stationary Random Processes. Strict-Sense and Wide-Sense Stationarity. Autocorrelation Function of a Stationary Process

Application of Batch Poisson Process to Random-sized Batch Arrival of Sediment Particles

Thermodynamic Functions at Isobaric Process of van der Waals Gases

Queueing Theory and Simulation. Introduction

Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits Lecture 14. Noise Spectral Analysis for Circuit Elements

ESTIMATING SCALING EXPONENTS IN AUDITORY-NERVE SPIKE TRAINS USING FRACTAL MODELS INCORPORATING REFRACTORINESS

Utility of Correlation Functions

Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction

Basics on 2-D 2 D Random Signal

Stochastic Processes. A stochastic process is a function of two variables:

2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008

Preliminary statistics

Lecture 4a: Continuous-Time Markov Chain Models

Transcription:

PHASE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOURCE TIME FUNCTION MODELED BY STOCHASTIC IMPULSE TRAIN 92 H MORIKAWA, S SAWADA 2, K TOKI 3, K KAWASAKI 4 And Y KANEKO 5 SUMMARY In order to discuss the relationship between the lower and higher frequency components of source spectra, we deal with impulse train model as source time function. Considering the successive rupture of small extent on a fault plane, we represent the source time function by time series which consist of random sequence of impulses. Under this assumption, the spectral characteristics of source time function are obtained analytically and numerically from the stochastic viewpoints: namely, on one hand, the trend of impulse train determines the frequency characteristics of phase spectrum in lower frequency range, and on the other hand, the uctuation from the trend settles higher frequency range. Furthermore, it is shown that the spectral properties of source time function can be determined using only two parameters which are number of impulses N and probability density function (PDF) of occurrence time of impulse f T (t). INTRODUCTION The objective of this study is to discuss the relationship between the lower and higher frequency components of source spectra and to model its spectral properties. For this purpose, we will deal with impulse train model as source time function, because spectral characteristics of source time function depend on the occurrence time of impulse function which corresponds to small extent on the fault. Considering the successive rupture of small extent on a fault plane, we will represent the source time function by impulses which are randomly generated on time axis from a probability model. There are many studies which deal with the stochastic processes of impulse train. Most of such studies are focused on the problems of \point process," which are mainly discussed as counting problems [ex. Daley and Vere-Jones, 988]. These studies did not treat the Fourier spectrum, while a few researchers deal with power spectra for spectral representation of the point processes [ex. Vanmarcke, 983, and Lin and Cai, 995]. We analytically derive the stochastic properties for Fourier amplitude and phase spectrum of time series which consist of impulses occurred randomly. In particular, introducing the group delay time spectrum t gr (ω) instead of Fourier phase spectrum, which is the gradient of phase spectrum, the stochastic characteristics of phase in frequency domain will be made clear. While the basic ideas of t gr (ω) have been appeared more than twenty years ago [Ohsaki, 979, Izumi and Katsukura, 983, and Soda, 986], there were little studies on this problem in this decade. We discuss newly the the group delay time spectrum from the viewpoints of stochastic impulse train. 2 3 4 5 School of Civil Engineering, Tottori University, Japan, E-mail: morika@mcn.ne.jp Disaster Prevention Research Inst, Kyoto Univ, Japan,E-mail: sawada@cat_sh.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp Graduate School of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan,E-mail: toki@quake.kuciv.kyoto-u.ac.jp Graduate School of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan,E-mail: toki@quake.kuciv.kyoto-u.ac.jp Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., Ltd., Japan, E-mail: y.kaneko@b2.ezweb.ne.jp

We will treat a time series obtained by 2. PROBLEM SETTING x(t) = (t t k ); k= () where (t) is Dirac's delta function, magnitude of impulses, N number of impulses, and t k random variable following any probability density function (PDF) f T (t). It should be noted that the magnitude can be constant without the loss of generality, because we can consider that some impulses occur at same time t k in a case where the impulses have dierent magnitudes. Using the relation that the Fourier transform of (t) is exp[i!], where i = p, and! is circular frequency, the Fourier transform of x(t) becomes X(!) = exp[i!t k ]: k= (2) Rewriting X(!) as A(!)exp[i(!)], the Fourier amplitude A(!) and phase spectrum (!) yield, respectively, A(!)= vu u t X N cos!(t k t`) (3) k= `= sin!t k (!)=tan k= : cos!t k k= (4) Then the group delay time spectrum t gr (!) ofx(t) isderived as t gr (!) = d(!) d! = t k cos!(t k t`) k= `= : (5) cos!(t k t`) k= `= To examine the generality of the constant magnitude, a simple example is presented in Figure. The uppermost panel (a) of this gure shows two impulses with dierent magnitudes, and the other panels compare the results obtained from the Eqs.(3) and Eq.(5) and from fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. Since these gures seem to be same, we can accept the supposition of constant magnitude of impulses. The binomial variate, generally speaking, is the number of successes in n-independent Bernoulli trials where the probability of success at each trial is p and the probability of failure is p. The probability function of the binomial variate X n is represented by P (X n = x) = n x! p x ( p) nx (x =; ; 2;:::;n): (6)

2 amp -2-2 3 4 time (sec) (a) Impulse train with dierent magnitude 5 Analytical 5 FFT 4 4 frequency (Hz) 3 2 frequency (Hz) 3 2-2 - 2 3 4 tgr (sec) (b) Group delay time (Analytical) -2-2 3 4 tgr (sec) (c) Group delay time (Numerical) 4 3.5 Analytical 4 3.5 FFT Fourier amplitude 3 2.5 2.5 Fourier amplitude 3 2.5 2.5.5.5.. frequency (Hz) (d) Fourier amplitude (Analytical).. frequency (Hz) (e) Fourier amplitude (Numerical) Figure Comparison between analytical and numerical results for a impulse train with dierent magnitude. Then, the mean and variance of X n are Xn = np, 2 Xn = np( p), respectively. Furthermore, the binomial variate X n canbeapproximated by the normal variate with mean np and variance np( p), provided np( p) > 25 for any p [Evans et al., 993]. Now, let us consider x(t i ) from Eq.() which represents the realized value of impulse train at a xed time interval [t i ;t i +t], where t is a small increment oftime. Then, x(t i ) can be treated as Bernoulli trial. Applying the binomial distribution to the impulse train x(t), n in Eq.(6) corresponds to the total number of impulses N, p to f T (t)t, and X n to n i, where f T (t) is the probability density function of the occurrence time of impulses and n i is the number of impulses occurred in a small time interval [t i ;t i +t]. Since we will consider large N, n i can be approximated by the normal variate for any t i. Thus, the stochastic impulse train x(t) of Eq.() can be treated as Gaussian process represented by N ((t); 2 (t)), where the mean (t) and variance 2 (t) are, respectively, (t)=np = Nf T (t)t 2 (t)=np( p) =Nf T (t)t( f T (t)t): (8) (7) To understand the characteristics of x(t), we will divide x(t) into two components: that is, x(t) =x m (t) +x s (t); (9) where x m (t) is the trend process of x(t) andx s (t) uctuation from x s (t). From Eqs.(7) and (8), we can obtain x m (t)=nf T (t)t ()

3 8 25 7 acc.(gal) 2 5 5 amplitude(gal.sec).. tgr(sec) 6 5 4 3 2 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 time(sec) e-6 e-8...... (a) A(!) (b) t gr (!) acc.(gal) 3 25 2 5 5 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 time(sec) acc.(gal) 6 4 2-2 -4-6 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 time(sec) Figure 2 Schematic example for Eq.(9). upper panel: original impulse train x(t), lower left panel: trend process x m (t), lower right panel: uctuation x s (t). amplitude(gal.sec).. e-6 As (ω) Am (ω) e-8...... tgr(sec) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 t grs (ω) t grm (ω) (c) A m (!) anda s (!) (d) t grm (!) andt grs (!) Figure 3 Fourier amplitude A(!) and group delay time t gr (!) x s (t)=n(;nf T (t)t( f T (t)t)) = p Nf T (t)t( f T (t)t) (t); () where (t) is Gaussian process with zero-mean and the expectation E[(t )(t 2 )] = (as t 6= t 2 )or (as t = t 2 ). Eq.() shows that the trend process x m (t) has similar shape with probability density function f T (t) for occurrence time of impulses. The coecient in Eq.(), that is, p Nf T (t)t( f T (t)t) can be regarded as the envelope function of x s (t). As an example, the trend process x m (t) and uctuation x s (t) for a case where f T (t) is triangular distribution are shown in Figure 2. 3. Basic Properties 3. FOURIER SPECTRUM OF IMPULSE TRAIN We will discuss the relationship between the stochastic process x(t) and its components x m (t) andx s (t). It is considered that x(t) is dominated by the component which has larger spectral amplitude. Namely, this can be formularized as ( A m (!) (!! c ) A(!) ' (2) A s (!) (!! c ) t gr (!) ' ( t grm (!) (!! c ) pt grs (!) (!! c ); (3) where A(!), A m (!), and A s (!) stands for Fourier amplitude spectra, t gr (!), t grm (!), and t grs (!) for group delay time spectra for x(t), x m (t), and x s (t), respectively.! c is a value on!-axis for the intersection of A m (!) and A s (!). Although the group delay time spectrum has large uctuation in high frequency range, our discussion, hereafter, will be focused on the average properties for simplicity. A(!), A m (!), and A s (!) are shown in the left panels of Figure 3 and t gr (!), t grm (!), and t grs (!) inthe right panels. From this gure, Eq.(2) provides good approximation, while Eq.(3) cannot be acceptable

tgr(sec) amplitude(gal.sec) because of the unsettled area in which the group delay time spectrum t gr (!) changes gradually from t grm (!)tot grs (!) around! c. One of reasons why such the area is observed, is existence of the uctuation of A s (!) around! c. Because we cannot determine uniquely which Fourier amplitude of x m (t) andx s (t) is larger. We will call this area \transition area" and use! and! + as the frequencies at lower and upper boundary of the area, respectively. From Figure 3, it appears that t gr (!) changes linearly from t grm (! )tot grs (! + ) in the transition area. Figure 4 shows schematically the relationship between the Fourier amplitudes and group delay time spectra for x(t), x m (t), and x s (t). Dividing the frequency range into three parts, that is, low and high frequency and transition area, we will model A(!)andt gr (!)foreach frequency range in the following sections. log Fourier amplitude A s of fluction x s ( t ) Fourier amplitude A (ω) of impulse train x(t) Fluctuation of A s(ω ) 3.2 Low Frequency Range Since the trend process x m (t) predominates in low frequency range, the Fourier spectrum can be determined without diculty: that is, Fourier amplitude A m(ω) of trend x m(t ) ω - ω c ω + Mean spectrum of group delay time for fluction xs( t ) log A m (!)=A f (!) Nt (4) t grm (!)=t grf (!); (5) transition area Mean spectrum of group delay time for impulse train x ( t ) Mean spectrum of group delay time of trend xs( t ) where A f (!) and t grf (!) arefourier amplitude and group delay time spectrum of f T (t), respectively. In a case to multiply the number of impulses N by,thevalue of A m (!) yields p times from Eq.(4). Furthermore, if f T (t) is triangular distribution, then A m (!) has gradient 2 on a log-log scale. Thus, the intersection! c of A m (!) anda s (!) is reduced to =4 times. 3.3 High Frequency Range On the other hand, uctuation x s (t) predominates in high frequency range. Since x s (t) is Gaussian white noise multiplied by complicated envelope function as shown in Eq.(), strict reduction of Fourier amplitude A s (!) and group delay timet grs (!) are generally dicult. We, therefore, will derive analytically the representativevalues of A s (!) and t grs (!). ω - ω c ω + log Figure 4 Relation between Fourier amplitude and group delay time of impulse train. amp amp.. (a) Fourier amplitude Probability density.5 5 5225335 amp (b) Histogram Figure 5 PDF of Fourier amplitude. gradient of Fourier amp. =.2785 For the Fourier amplitude A s (!) in high frequency range, it is considered that the average of A s (!) is constant from the observation of numerical results. The constant value coincides with the root mean squared of time series x s (t): A s (!) A s = = s s fx s (t)g 2 = T T s N f T (t)( f T (t))dt; T where T denotes the duration time of x(t). 2 (t) (6) time(sec).. frequaency(hz) transition area 2 6-6. frequaency(hz) Figure 6 Determination of transition area.

Generally, the following relation can be obtained for any time series z(t) [Izumi and Katsukura, 983]: E Z Z t jz(t)j2 dt = 2E t gr(!)jz(!)j 2 d!; (7) where z(t) is the analytical function of z(t), Z(!) thefourier coecients in complex of z(t), and E = Z Z jz(t)j2 dt = 2 j Z(!)j 2 d!: (8) Eq.(7) means that the center of gravity for squared envelope function jz(t)j 2 coincides with average of group delay time spectrum. For the group delay time spectrum t grs (!) in high frequency range, it seems that the average of t grs (!) is constant, and then we willuset grs as such the constant value. Taking Eq.(7) into account, t grs yields t grs = E t 2 (t)dt = E t Nf T (t)( f T (t))dt; (9) where E = 2 (t)dt = Nf T (t)( f T (t))dt: (2) 3.4 Transition Area To determine the lower and upper boundary of transition area! and! + for t gr (!), we have to analytically estimate the variance of A(!) in high frequency range. If t k (k =; 2;:::;N) are random variables in Eq.(), the probability density function of x = A(!) is derived from Eq.(3) for large N as follows: f A (x) = 2x N exp x2 N : (2) It should be notice in this equation that f A (x) is independent of the probability density function f T (t) for the occurrence time of impulses. In Figure 5, Eq.(2) is compared with a histogram of Fourier amplitude which is obtained from numerically simulated impulse train x(t) of Eq.(). From this gure, it is observed that Eq.(2) agrees with the numerical result. Using relation y = log x, moreover, Eq.(2) is transformed as 2ln 2y f Y (y) = n exp 2y : (22) n Then, the mean y and standard deviation y of the random variable y are y = C +ln 2ln n r y =ln 24 =:2785; (23) (24)

tgr(sec) 8 75 7 65 6 55 5 Triangular distribution Shape parameter c=7 Number of impulse N=, by FFT tgr(sec) 4 35 3 25 2 5 Triangular distribution Shape parameter c=2 Number of impulse N=,, by FFT 45 4... Analytical 5... Figure 7 Example of the estimated group delay time. Analytical where C stands for Euler's constant. From Eq.(24), the standard deviation of log A(!) is constant: namely, it is independent of number of impulses N and PDF f T (t) for occurrence time of impulses. This means that the range of transition area depend only on the gradient offourier amplitude of trend process x m (t). Using the properties obtained above, we can determine the transition area as shown in Figure 6. 4. MODELING PHASE SPECTRA On the basis of the discussion in the previous sections, we can determine the spectral properties of source time function modeled by stochastic impulse train. The procedure for modeling the spectrum is given as follows: () x(t) is divided into two components: that is, x(t) =x m (t)+x s (t), where x m (t) stands for trend and x s (t) for uctuation. (2) x m (t) andx s (t) are represented by x m (t)=nf T (t)t (25) p x s (t)= Nf T (t)t( f T (t)t) (t); (26) where (t) is Gaussian process with zero-mean and expectation E[(t )(t 2 )]=(ast = t 2 )or (as t 6= t 2 ). (3) Fourier amplitude and group delay time for x m (t) are obtained through the Fourier transform of f T (t): A m (!)=A f (!) N t t grm (!)=t grf (!): (27) (28) (4) Fourier amplitude of x s (t) is calculated as root mean squared of envelope function for x s (t): s N A s = f T (t)( f T (t))dt: (29) T (5) Group delay time of x s (t) is calculated as the center of gravity ofenvelope function for x s (t): Z t grs = T t Nf T (t)( f T (t))dt: (3) E (6) Then, A(!) is obtained as follows: 8 < A m (!)=A f (!) N t (!! c ) A(!) ' q R : N T A s = T f T (t)( f T (t))dt (! >! c ): (3) (7) The standard deviation of log A s (!) is independent ofn and f T (t): As =:2785. (8) The lower and upper boundaries of transition area! and! + are determined from As and A m (!).

(9) Then, t gr (!) is obtained as follows: 8 t grm (!) =t grf (!) (! <! ) >< t gr (!) ' t grm (! log! log! )+ log! >: + log! ft grs(! + ) t grm (! )g (!!<! + ) R T t Nf T (t)( f T (t))dt (! +!): t grs = E (32) The average properties of group delay time for impulse train is uniquely determined from only two factors, namely, the number of impulses N and the probability density function f T (t) for occurrence time of impulses. Figure 7 shows t gr (!) estimated on the basis of f T (t) and N following the above procedure. In this gure, it is observed that the analytically obtained t gr (!) agrees with the result calculated by FFT method. This means that the proposed method is appropriate for analysis of phase properties of source time function. 6. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions derived from this study are summarized as follows:. The stochastic impulse train can be divided into two components such as trend process and uctuation from trend. Then, the spectral properties of impulse train are dominated by a component which has larger spectral amplitude. 2. The spectral properties of source time function depend on the trend process in low frequency range and on the uctuation from trend in high frequency range. 3. In the middle frequency range, the \transition area" appears because of the uctuation of Fourier amplitude. The range of transition area can be determined by the standard deviation of Fourier amplitude in high frequency range, which is constant and independent of number of impulses and PDF for occurrence time of impulses. 4. It is shown that we can analytically derive the average properties for group delay time spectrum of impulse train using only two factors which are the number of impulses and PDF for occurrence time of impulses. REFERENCES Evans, M., Hastings, N., and Peacock, B. (993), Statistical Distribution, Second Edition, Johon Wiley & Sons, New York, pp.38{4. Daley, D.J. and Vere-Jones, D. (988), An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Springer- Verlag, New York. Izumi, M. and Katsukura, Y. (983), \A Fundamental Study on Extraction of Phase Information in Earthquake Motions," J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No. 327, pp.2{27 (in Japanese). Lin, Y.K. and Cai, G.Q. (995), Probabilistic Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, pp.4{47. Ohsaki, Y. (979), \On the Signicance of Phase Content in Earthquake Ground Motions," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 7, pp.427{439. Soda, S. (986), \Basic Study on Application of Probability Characteristics of Phase Inclination to Nonstationary Random Vibration Analysis," J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No. 365, pp.48{57 (in Japanese). Vanmarcke, E. (983), Random Fields, MIT press, Massachusetts, pp.9{92.