Solution Set of Homework # 6 Monday, December 12, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Laloë, Second Volume

Similar documents
Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Outline

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 12 and Study Aid

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Chapter 1. Quantum interference 1.1 Single photon interference

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Lecture #1. Review. Postulates of quantum mechanics (1-3) Postulate 1

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 20, March 8, 2006

CHAPTER 6: AN APPLICATION OF PERTURBATION THEORY THE FINE AND HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM. (From Cohen-Tannoudji, Chapter XII)

For example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions.

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

3 Angular Momentum and Spin

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Notes on atomic and molecular energy levels and fundaments of spectroscopy

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

9 Electron orbits in atoms

Physics 622: Quantum Mechanics -- Part II --

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Solution of Second Midterm Examination Thursday November 09, 2017

Are these states normalized? A) Yes

Solutions Final exam 633

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m.- 9:30 a.m.

Quantum mechanics of many-fermion systems

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

Final Examination. Tuesday December 15, :30 am 12:30 pm. particles that are in the same spin state 1 2, + 1 2

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

Isospin. K.K. Gan L5: Isospin and Parity 1

Adding angular momenta

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 8 (10/4/06) Neutron-Proton Scattering

Problem 1: Step Potential (10 points)

The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Problem Set # 4 SOLUTIONS

2 The Density Operator

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 11

Representations of angular momentum

Physics 125 Course Notes Identical Particles Solutions to Problems F. Porter

Potential energy, from Coulomb's law. Potential is spherically symmetric. Therefore, solutions must have form

1 Algebra of State Vectors

1. Estimate the lifetime of an excited state of hydrogen. Give your answer in terms of fundamental constants.

CHM Physical Chemistry II Chapter 9 - Supplementary Material. 1. Constuction of orbitals from the spherical harmonics

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

C/CS/Phys 191 Uncertainty principle, Spin Algebra 10/11/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 13

Energy Level Energy Level Diagrams for Diagrams for Simple Hydrogen Model

Physics 622: Quantum Mechanics -- Part II --

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 1

Basic Physical Chemistry Lecture 2. Keisuke Goda Summer Semester 2015

A.1 Alkaline atoms in magnetic fields

Fine structure in hydrogen - relativistic effects

Group representation theory and quantum physics

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Degeneracy & in particular to Hydrogen atom

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Homework Solution Set # 3. Thursday, September 22, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Lalo, Second Volume Complement G X

QM and Angular Momentum

PHYSICS 721/821 - Spring Semester ODU. Graduate Quantum Mechanics II Midterm Exam - Solution

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics Thursday February 21, Problem # 1 (10pts) We are given the operator U(m, n) defined by

Electrons in a periodic potential

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

PHYS852 Quantum Mechanics II, Spring 2010 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 8: Solutions. Topics covered: hydrogen fine structure

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Notes on Spin Operators and the Heisenberg Model. Physics : Winter, David G. Stroud

1 Recall what is Spin

Properties of Elementary Particles

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

( )! rv,nj ( R N )! ns,t

Outline Spherical symmetry Free particle Coulomb problem Keywords and References. Central potentials. Sourendu Gupta. TIFR, Mumbai, India

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Angular Momentum set II

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Homework assignment 3: due Thursday, 10/26/2017

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Mechanics crash course (For the scholar with an higher education in mathematics) Fabio Grazioso :48

26 Group Theory Basics

PH425 Spins Homework 5 Due 4 pm. particles is prepared in the state: + + i 3 13

Time Independent Perturbation Theory

Space-Time Symmetries

Chapter Electron Spin. * Fine structure:many spectral lines consist of two separate. lines that are very close to each other.

Approximation Methods in QM

ψ(t) = U(t) ψ(0). (6.1.1)

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

Transcription:

Department of Physics Quantum II, 570 Temple University Instructor: Z.-E. Meziani Solution Set of Homework # 6 Monday, December, 06 Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Laloë, Second Volume Complement D XIV Solution Exercise, page 447 We summarize the results of a) and b) in the tables below a) E g ω 0 ω 0 4 3 ω 0 8 4 ω 0 4 5 ω 0 b) E g 0 ω 0 ω 0 3 ω 0 4 ω 0 5 ω 0 6 ω 0 a) h 0 is the Hamiltonian of a single particle, and acts only on the orbital variables. We are concerned with both the spin space and the subspace of E r, which is spanned by the three eigenstates of h 0 whose eigenvalues are 0, ω 0 and ω 0. These eigenvalues are non-degenerate in the orbital space of E r. Electrons are spin-/ particles, so the Pauli Exclusion Principle applies. The problem is to distribute the three electrons among three energy levels while satisfying the principle. Let and represent spin-up and spin-down electrons, respectively. Now, we draw all of the ways to fill the energy levels. Note: means up or down. Each contributes a factor of to the degeneracy. Energy Level ω 0 ω 0 0 Result E = E = E = E = E = E = E = ω 0 ω 0 ω 0 3 ω 0 4 ω 0 4 ω 0 5 ω 0 b) Same question for spin-0 bosons. Since they are bosons, Pauli Exclusion does not apply. Since they are spin-0, there is no degeneracy due to spin. Let (n) indicate the number of particles in each energy level: Energy Level ω 0 () () () () () (3) ω 0 () () () (3) () () 0 (3) () () () () () Result E = 0 E = E = E = E = E = E = E = E = E = ω 0 ω 0 ω 0 3 ω 0 3 ω 0 4 ω 0 4 ω 0 5 ω 0 6 ω 0 Exercise 6, page 449 Possible values of the relative angular momentum of two identical particles

a) First assume that the two particles are identical bosons of zero spin (π mesons for example). α. We use the { r G, r } basis of the state space E of the system, composed of common eigenvectors of the observables R G and R. We want to show that Since r = r r and r G = ( r + r ) we can write ˆP r G, r = r G, r () Now exchanging particle and we have ˆP = r G, r = ˆP r G = ( r + r ), r = ( r r ) () ˆP = r G, r = ˆP r G = ( r + r ), ( r r ) = ( r + r ), ( r r ) = r G = ( r + r ), r = ( r r ) = r G, r (3) β. We now go to the { p G ; E n, l, m } basis of common vectors of P G, H r, L and L z ( L = R P is the relative angular momentum of the two particles). We will show that these new basis vectors are given by expressions of the form: p G ; E n, l, m = R nl (r)yl m (θ, φ) r G, r (4) To show this we just need to insert the closure relation in the basis {vertr G, r } expressed as r G, r r G, r G = (5) p G ; E n, l, m = p G ; E n, l, m = r G, r r G, r p G ; E n, l, m G = G r G p G r E n, l, m r G, r (6) We have used the fact that r G, r = r G r where each ket is a state in a subspace of the center of mass space and the relative coordinate space. Now since we know that r G is a conjugate coordinate of p G, the projection coefficients from the position r G to the momentum eigenstates p G, are plane waves: r G p G = (π ) 3/ ei p G r G / Furthermore the projection of the Dirac states of the relative position representation gives r E n, l, m = R nl (r)yl m (θ, φ) (8) (7)

replacing these terms in the equation (6) above we get the desired result, namely p G ; E n, l, m = R nl (r)yl m (θ, φ) r G, r (9) Now we will show that: ˆP p G ; E n, l, m = ( ) l p G ; E n, l, m (0) If we act with the exchange operation on the equivalent expression of p G ; E n, l, m given by equation (9 ˆP p G ; E n, l, m = ˆP p G ; E n, l, m = r G, r r G, r ˆP p G ; E n, l, m G = r G, r r G, r p G ; E n, l, m G = G r G p G r E n, l, m r G, r = R nl (r)yl m (π θ, π + φ) r G, r = ( ) l R nl (r)yl m (θ, φ) r G, r = ( ) l p G ; E n, l, m () wehere we have used r G, r ˆP = r G, r and the Parity operator ˆ P. γ. It is clear that since the states describing this system of two bosons have to be symmetric, it is clear that l can only take even values to respect the symmetrization postulate. b) Now the two particles under consideration are identical fermions of spin / (electrons or protons). α. The state space of the system is { r G, r; S, M } basis of common eigenstates of R G, R, S and S z, where S = S + S is the total spin of the system. We want to show that ˆP r G, r; S, M = ( ) S+ r G, r; S, M () Since we can write the state vector r G, r; S, M as a tensor product of r G, r S, M of spatial states and spin states and because we have already seen the action of ˆP on the spatial states let us now determine its action on the spin states. From Section B of Chapter X we can write for the triplet states ˆP, + = ˆP : +; : + = : +; : + = : +; : + =, + ˆP, 0 = ˆP ( : +; : + : ; : + ) = ( : ; : + + : +; : ) =, 0 ˆP, = ˆP : ; : = : ; : = : ; : =, (3) 3

This result can be summarized in one equation ˆP S =, M = ( ) S=+ S =, M. Now for the singlet state we have ˆP 0, 0 = ˆP ( : +; : : ; : + ) = ( : ; : + : +; : ) = ( : +; : : ; : + ) = 0, 0 (4) which we can summarize as ˆP S = 0, 0 = ( ) S=0+ S =, M. Therefore combining the triplet and singlet state and the spatial part we arrive at the following result note the change of sign for the relative spatial variable r ˆP r G, r; S, M = ( ) S+ r G, r; S, M (5) β. Making the transformation from the r G, r; S, M states to the p G ; E n, l, m; SM states it is clear that we need to combine the result of a) β and b) α and can find through the tensor product of spin states and spatial states (expressed in terms of spherical coordinate system) the following result b β namely ˆP p G ; E n, l, m; S, M = ( ) S+ ( ) l p G ; E n, l, m; S, M (6) γ. The values allowed by the symmetrization for fermions are such that ˆP p G ; E n, l, m; S, M = p G ; E n, l, m; S, M (7) this implies that l + S + should be odd for all combinations of l and S thus l values should be odd for the triplet state and even values of l for the singlet state. c) The total scattering cross section in the center of mass of two distinguishable particles interacting through the potential V (r) is written as: σ = 4π k (l + ) sin δ l (8) with δ l as the phase shifts associated with V (r). l=0 α. When we have identical particles and the measurement device is equally sensitive to both particles it means that there is an ambiguity between two different scattering configurations which are indistinguishable, one where the angle of the scattered particle is θ and one where r r thus θ = π θ. Here the angles are described in the center of mass of the system of the two particles. β. The calculation of the cross section according to Chapter VIII formula C-56 needs to be augmented by a different scattering amplitude (f k (θ) + f k (π θ)) to include both possibilities of scattering. For the case of bosons f k (π θ) = ( ) l f k (θ) with thus f k (π θ) = +f k (θ). Thus the properly normalized scattering amplitude of formula C-55 should be with l is restricted to even values. This leads to (f k (θ) + f k (π θ)) = (f k (θ) + f k (θ)) σ = f k (θ) (9) σ = 8π k (l + ) sin δ l (0) γ. Note that the sum is only on the even values of the quantum number l. For the case of fermions f k (π θ) = ( ) l f k (θ) but here we need to include the spin of the particles. Therefore for the triplet spin 4

states l is odd with f k (π θ) = f k (θ) and for the singlet case l is even leading to f k (π θ) = f k (θ). Thus the scattering amplitude of formula is (f k (θ) f k (π θ)) = (f k (θ) + f k (θ)) = f k (θ) = f k (θ) () In order to evaluate the identical fermions cross section we need to take into account that the total spin part of the amplitude is normalized properly. For the cross section we have /4 probability that the scattering happens when the two particles are in a singlet state configuration with even l values and 3/4 probability that the scattering occurs when the particles are in a triplet state configuration with l is restricted to even values. This leads to σ = 4π k { σ = π k /4 (l + ) sin δ l + 3/4 } (l + ) sin δ l l odd { (l + ) sin δ l + 3 } (l + ) sin δ l l odd () 5