Studies of OAM at JLAB

Similar documents
Experimental Overview Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs)

Spin and Azimuthal Asymmetries at JLAB

Generalized Parton Distributions and Nucleon Structure

Probing Generalized Parton Distributions in Exclusive Processes with CLAS

Shape and Structure of the Nucleon

The Physics Program of CLAS12

Measurements with Polarized Hadrons

Generalized Parton Distributions Recent Progress

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Meson Production at JLab/CLAS

Deeply Virtual Compton JLab

DVCS with CLAS. Elton S. Smith. Jefferson Lab. Conference on Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics New York, Elton S.

The GPD program at Jefferson Lab: recent results and outlook

Experimental Program of the Future COMPASS-II Experiment at CERN

Helicity: Experimental Status. Matthias Grosse Perdekamp, University of Illinois

A glimpse of gluons through deeply virtual Compton scattering

HERMES status and future running

Timelike Compton Scattering

Experimental investigation of the nucleon transverse structure

Exclusive Physics with the HERMES Recoil Detector

Single and double polarization asymmetries from deeply virtual exclusive π 0 electroproduction

THE GPD EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM AT JEFFERSON LAB. C. Muñoz Camacho 1

hermes Collaboration

Generalized Parton Distributions Program at COMPASS. QCD Evolution 2015

The Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade

Neutrons in a Spin: Nucleon Structure at Jefferson Lab

Hall A/C collaboration Meeting June Xuefei Yan Duke University E Collaboration Hall A collaboration

Transverse Target Asymmetry in Exclusive Charged Pion Production at 12 GeV

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4. He: New results and future perspectives

GENERALIZED PARTON DISTRIBUTIONS

Nucleon Spin Structure: Overview

Hall C SIDIS Program basic (e,e p) cross sections

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron

Neutron DVCS. Carlos Muñoz Camacho. IPN-Orsay, CNRS/IN2P3 (France)

Transversity experiment update

hunting the OAM Delia Hasch a very brief review of the spin sum rule observables of OAM some attempts to quantify OAM conclusion

HERMES Status Report

Transverse Spin Effects and k T -dependent Functions

Development of a framework for TMD extraction from SIDIS data. Harut Avakian (JLab)

Target single- and double-spin asymmetries in DVCS off a longitudinal polarised hydrogen target at HERMES

well known known uncertain

The Longitudinal Photon, Transverse Nucleon, Single-Spin Asymmetry in Exclusive Pion Production

Opportunities in Hadron Structure. Guided by Key Questions

THE NUCLEUS AS A QCD LABORATORY: HADRONIZATION, 3D TOMOGRAPHY, AND MORE

Possible relations between GPDs and TMDs

Study of the structure of hadrons using beam and target polarization observables with CLAS AKA Overview of the eg1- dvcs results

Transverse SSA Measured at RHIC

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4. He: New results and future perspectives

Exclusive Processes at HERMES

Distribution Functions

Hadron Tomography. Matthias Burkardt. New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM, 88003, U.S.A. Hadron Tomography p.

Status report of Hermes

Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions

Latifa Elouadrhiri. Phone: X Jefferson Lab. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1

Hall B Physics Program and Upgrade Plan

Experimental Studies of Hadron Structure via Generalized Parton Distributions

Two Photon Exchange in Inclusive and Semi Inclusive DIS

Recent results on DVCS from Hall A at JLab

Present and Future Exploration of the Nucleon Spin and Structure at COMPASS

The Neutral-Particle Spectrometer

Probing nucleon structure by using a polarized proton beam

Subleading-twist effects in single-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive DIS on a longitudinally polarized hydrogen target

Nuclear GPDs and DVCS in Collider kinematics. Vadim Guzey. Theory Center, Jefferson Lab. Outline

Spin Structure of the Nucleon: quark spin dependence

Measurements of unpolarized azimuthal asymmetries. in SIDIS at COMPASS

Transverse Momentum Dependent distributions:theory...phenomenology, future

Recent Development in Proton Spin Physics

Studying Evolution with Jets at STAR. Renee Fatemi University of Kentucky May 28 th, 2015

Latifa Elouadrhiri. Phone: X Jefferson Lab. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1

Flavor Decomposition of Nucleon Spin via polarized SIDIS: JLab 12 GeV and EIC. Andrew Puckett Los Alamos National Laboratory INT 09/24/2010

Present and Future of Polarized Target Experiment at CLAS12. Harut Avakian (JLab)

Proposal submitted to the SPS comittee (May 17,2010)

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Realistic parameterization of GPDs and its applications. Simonetta Liuti University of Virginia. Jlab Theory Group Seminar November 10th, 2008.

Measuring the gluon Sivers function at a future Electron-Ion Collider

SSA and polarized collisions

Target single- and double-spin asymmetries in DVCS off a longitudinal polarized hydrogen target at HERMES

Asmita Mukherjee Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India

Deep Exclusive π " Production with transversely polarized He3 using SoLID

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Polarised Drell-Yan Process in the COMPASS Experiment

Proton longitudinal spin structure- RHIC and COMPASS results

QCD Collinear Factorization for Single Transverse Spin Asymmetries

Partonic Structure of Light Nuclei

Exciting opportunities at JLab GeV!

Nucleon Spin Structure from Confinement to Asymptotic Freedom

GPDs and TMDs at Electron-Ion Collider. Workshop on hadron tomography at J-PARC and KEKB January 6 th, 2017 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan Yuji Goto (RIKEN)

Relations between GPDs and TMDs (?)

TCS with transversally polarized target at NPS

Measurements of transverse momentum in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at CLAS

Lessons from Lepton-Nucleon and Lepton-Nuclei Interactions Probing the structure of the atomic nucleus

QCD Factorization and Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry in ep collisions

Transverse target spin asymmetries in exclusive ρ 0 muoproduction

Measuring the gluon Sivers function at a future Electron-Ion Collider

Progress on the DVCS program at Compass E. Burtin CEA Saclay Irfu/SPhN GDR nucléon, Ecole Polytechnique, 12 décembre 2008

Experimental results on GPDs

DVCS and DVMP: results from CLAS and the experimental program of CLAS12

JAMboree. Theory Center Jamboree Jefferson Lab, Dec 13, Pedro Jimenez Delgado

Study of the hadron structure using the polarised Drell-Yan process at COMPASS

Single Spin Asymmetries on proton at COMPASS

Outline. Generalized Parton Distributions. Elastic Form Factors and Charge Distributions in Space. From Form Factors to Quark Spin Distributions

Transcription:

Studies of OAM at JLAB Harut Avakian Jefferson Lab UNM/RBRC Workshop on Parton Angular Momentum, NM, Feb 2005 Introduction Exclusive processes Semi-Inclusive processes Summary * In collaboration with V.Burkert and L.Elouadrhiri

Parton picture: Longitudinal and transverse variables long before

Quark Angular Momentum Sum Rule GPDs H u, H d, E u, E d provide access to total quark contribution to proton angular momentum. Proton s spin ½ = ½ (Δu+Δd+Δs) + L q + J g J q J q = 1 2 J G = 1 2 1 xdx [ H q ( x, ξ,0) + E q ( x, ξ,0) ] 1 X. Ji, Phy.Rev.Lett.78,610(1997) Large x contributions important.

3D Parton Distributions TMD PDFs f pu (x,k T ), GPDs H pu (x,ξ,t).. Measure momentum transfer to quark d 2 k T ξ=0,t=0 dx Measure momentum transfer to target PDFs f pu (x,k T ), g 1, h 1 FFs F 1pu (t),f 2pu (t).. Analysis of SIDIS and DVMP are complementary

Form Factor Studies Sachs Form Factors G E (t)=f 1 (t)+t/4m 2 *F 2 (t) G M (t)=f 1 (t)+f 2 (t) ~9 0% n More data expected in 2006/2007

Form Factor Studies Use various parameterizations for GPDs to fit the existing form factor data A.Afanasev hep-ph/9910565 Diehl et al, Eur.Phys.J c39 (2005) M.Guidal et al PRD (2005) Different parameterizations yield different contributions for quarks to the OAM A)Large L d and small L u B)Sum of L u and L d small Issues: different realistic fits to FFs produce different values for Lq fits done at high t, need to be extrapolated to t 0 More observables needed for detailed studies of GPDs and the OAM (RCS,DVCS,DVMP)

Hard Exclusive Processes and GPDs DVCS DVMP long. only hard gluon hard vertices DVCS for different polarizations of DVMP for different mesons is beam and target provide access to ~ sensitive to flavor contributions different combinations of GPDs H, H, E (ρ 0 /ρ + select H, E, for u/d flavors, π, η, K select H, E) Study the asymptotic regime and guide theory in describing HT.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering ep->e p γ DVCS GPD BH d 4 σ dq 2 dx B dtdφ ~ T DVCS + T BH 2 T BH : given by elastic form factors T DVCS : determined by GPDs Polarized beam, unpolarized target: ~ Δσ LU ~ sinφim{f 1 H + ξ(f 1 +F 2 )H +kf 2 E} dσ/dt (nb/gev 4 ) 1 10-1 10-2 DVCS 6 GeV 27 GeV 200 GeV Kinematically suppressed Unpolarized beam, longitudinal target: ~ Δσ UL ~ sinφim{f 1 H+ξ(F 1 +F 2 )(H +.. } Kinematically suppressed Unpolarized beam, transverse target: Δσ UT ~ sinφim{k 1 (F 2 H-F 1 E ) +.. } Kinematically suppressed 10-3 10-4 10-5 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 -t(gev 2 ) ξ = x B /(2-x B ),k = t/4m 2 BH 0 0.5 1 Different GPD combinations accessible as azimuthal moments of the total cross section.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering ep e p γ s I I A xb s1 LU y BH c0 8 Ky ( 2 y ) Im H ~ Δ = λ Way to access to GPDS [ F H ( F F ) F Ε ] x 2 B + + 1 1 2 x B 1 2 2 4 M Interference responsible for SSA, contain the same lepton propagator P 1 (φ) as BH 2 GPD combinations accessible as azimuthal moments of the total cross section.

φ-dependent amplitude 2 Q t y col = = 2 Q xt 2 2 t Q ( Q 2xME y = col 2 ( Q 2ME ) x ) BH φ=0 5.7 GeV φ=45 φ=90 DVCS x=0.25 Strong dependence on kinematics of prefactor φ-dependence, at y=y col P 1 (φ)=0 Fraction of pure DVCS increases with t and φ

DVCS Experiments CLAS at 4.3 GeV HERMES 27 GeV Α(φ) = αsinφ + βsin2φ S. Stepanyan et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) A. Airapetian et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)

GPDs from ep->e p γ Requirements for precision (<15%) measurements of s 2 I and GPDs from DVCS SSA: Define relation between A LU and s 2 I effect of other non-0 moments ~5-10% effect of finite bins ~10% Define background corrections pion contamination ~10% radiative background ADVCS <3% at CLAS More relevant when proton is not detected

DVCS event samples 3 event samples(after data quality cuts) 1) ep 0 photons (~2M events) tight cuts on PID,missing mass MX 2) epγ 1 photon in Calorimeter (~150000 events) cut on the direction θ γx <0.015, 3) epγγ 2 photon(π 0 ) in Calorimeter (~70000 events) cut on the direction θ πx <0.02, epγ(dvcs) epγ(π 0 ) Kinematic coverage of 5.75 GeV(red) and 5.48(blue) CLAS data sets Angular cut most efficient in separating π 0

π 0 MC vs Data Exclusive pi0 production simulated using a realistic MC Kinematic distributions in x,q 2,t tuned to describe the CLAS data

π 0 beam SSA cross section Main unknown in corrections of photon SSA are the π 0 contamination and its beam SSA. 1.6<Q 2 <2.6, 0.22<x<0.32 Use epγγ to estimate the contribution of π0 in the ep and epγ samples CLAS 5.7 GeV PRELIMINARY Contamination from π 0 photons increasing at large t and x and also at large f. Significant SSA measured for exclusive π0s also should be accounted

BH cosφ moment A LU c BH 0 λ (1+ c s I I I BH BH s2 sinφ λ 2 sinφ λ 2( 1 /2 0 )sin2 BH BH BH 1 / c0 cosφ ) c0 BH cosφ moment can generate ~3% sin2φ in the A LU s c c φ

DVCS SSA kinematic dependences at 5.7 GeV PRELIMINARY Fine binning allows to observe the x and Q 2 dependence A LU for ep->ep[γ] sample with -t<0.5 GeV 2 Preliminary data for fully exclusive epγ is consistent with the ep data and consistent with GPD base predictions

Dedicated DVCS experiments Dedicated detection of 3 particles e, p and γ in final state Firmly establish scaling laws (up to Q 2 ~ 5 GeV 2 ), if observed, or deviations thereof understood, first significant measurement of GPDs. Large kinematical coverage in x B and t e p γ e JLab/Hall A HRS JLab/CLAS Calorimeter and superconducting magnet within CLAS torus 424 PbWO4 crystals e Beam LH2 target p γ e Electromagnetic calorimeter Plastic scintillator array HRS + PbF 2 + Plastic scintillator H(e,e γp) D(e,e γn)n dedicated calorimeters

Extraction of GPD H from A LU moment c LU epγ 2<Q 2 <2.4 GeV A LU /c LU ξ(f 1 +F 2 )H +kf 2 E ~20% ~ Red[blue] points correspond to projected A LU [un]corrected for π0 (bin by bin) H stands for the ratio of the A LU and prefactor calculated for all events in a bin (averaged over φ) Curves are for a simple model for CFF H (blue) and H+ (red)

Target Spin Asymmetry: t- Dependence Unpolarized beam, longitudinal target: ~ Δσ UL ~ sinφim{f 1 H+ξ(F 1 +F 2 )(H +.. } Δσ LL ~ cosφre{f 1 H+ξ(F ~ 1 +F 2 )(H +.. } Kinematically suppressed First data available(5 CLAS days), more(60 days) to come at 6 GeV Measurements with polarized target will constrain the polarized GPD and combined with beam SSA measurements would allow precision measurement of unpolarized GPDs.

C. Hadjidakis et al., PLB 605 Exclusive ρ meson production: ep epρ 0 CLAS (4.2 GeV) Regge (JML) GPD (MG-MVdh) CLAS (5.75 GeV) GPD formalism (beyond leading order) describes approximately data for x B <0.4, Q 2 >1.5 GeV 2 Analysis in progress Two-pion invariant mass spectra Decent description in pqcd framework already at moderate Q 2

e p Exclusive π + π and π + π 0 e p ρ π + π - e - p e - nρ+ π + π 0 ρ 0 ρ+ n Provide access to different combinations of orbital momentum contributions J u,j d ρ 0 -> 2J u + J d, ρ + -> J u -J d

Exclusive ρ 0 production on transverse target 2Δ (Im(AB*))/π Α UT = Α 2 (1 ξ 2 ) Β 2 (ξ 2 +t/4m 2 ) - Re(ΑΒ )2ξ 2 ρ 0 A~ 2H u + H d B ~ 2E u + E d ρ 0 ρ + A ~ H u -H d B ~ E u -E d E u, E d needed for angular momentum sum rule. K. Goeke, M.V. Polyakov, M. Vanderhaeghen, 2001 Asymmetry is a more appropriate observable for GPD studies at JLab energies as possible corrections to the cross section are expected to cancel

TMD measurements in SIDIS (γ*p πx) TMD PDFs related to interference between L=0 and L=1 light-cone wave functions. TMD Process FF Moment f 1T ep eπx D 1 sin(φh φs) h 1 ep eπx H 1 sin(φh φs ) h 1L ep eπx H 1 sin(φh φs ) S T (q P T ) φs =π/2-φ h φs =π-φ h f L ep eπx D 1 sinφh Survive in jet limit g ep eπx D 1 sinφh h L ep eπx H 1 sinφh Significant beam and target SSA were observed in all listed channels, more data under way

Sivers Effect studies with Transversely polarized target E06-010 and E06-011 Proposal approved, to study the Sivers function at JLab (Hall-A)

Sivers SSA at CLAS @5.7GeV Expected precision of the A UT with transversely polarized target Measurement of π 0 A UT at CLAS would allow model independent extraction of the Sivers function π+ Sivers A UT ~ Simultaneous measurement of SIDIS, exclusive ρ,ρ+,ω and DVCS asymmetries with a transversely polarized target.

Polarized target SSA using CLAS at 6 GeV q q h1 L ( x ) H 1 ( z ) sin 2 φ q AUL = D 60 days of CLAS+IC UL q q f ( x ) D ( z ) (L=1.5.10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) q 1 1 curves, χqsm from Efremov et al H unf =-5H fav H unf =-1.2H fav H unf =0 Provide measurement of SSA for all 3 pions, extract the Mulders TMD and study Collins fragmentation with longitudinally polarized target Allows also measurements of 2-pion asymmetries

Target SSA measurements at CLAS σ sin φ UL S L M Q y 2 q 1 y eq xf L ( x) D1 Σ q, q q ( z) p 1 sinφ+p 2 sin2φ ep e πx CLAS PRELIMINARY W 2 >4 GeV 2 Q 2 >1.1 GeV 2 y<0.85 0.4<z<0.7 M X >1.4 GeV p 1 = 0.059±0.010 p 2 =-0.041±0.010 p 1 =-0.042±0.015 p 2 =-0.052±0.016 p 1 =0.082±0.018 p 2 =0.012±0.019 P T <1 GeV 0.12<x<0.48 Significant SSA measured for pions with longitudinally polarized target Complete azimuthal coverage crucial for separation of sinφ, sin2φ moments

A LU x-dependence: CLAS @ 5.7 GeV π+,0.5<z<0.8 Parton distribution g (x) is calculated within the same dynamical model of Afanasev, Carlson Assume k T is small Assume NLO corrections small Beam SSA for π 0 may provide a FF independent access to g

Measuring the Q 2 dependence of SSA σ sinφ LU(UL) ~F LU(UL) ~ 1/Q (Twist-3) For fixed x, 1/Q behavior expected Wide kinematic coverage and higher statistics will allow to check the higher twist nature of beam and longitudinal target SSAs

CLAS12 High luminosity polarized (~80%) CW beam Wide physics acceptance (exclusive, semi-inclusive current and target fragmentation) Wide geometric acceptance 12GeV significantly increase the kinematic acceptance and accessible luminosity Provides new insight into - quark orbital angular momentum contributions - to the nucleon spin - 3D structure of the nucleon s interior and correlations - quark flavor polarization

Summary Current JLab data are consistent with a partonic picture, and can be described by a variety of theoretical models. High luminosity, polarized CW beam, wide kinematic and geometric acceptance allow studies of exclusive and semi-inclusive processes, providing data needed to constrain relevant 3D distribution functions (TMDs,GPDs) Experimental investigation of properties of 3D PDFs at JLab, complementary to planed studies at HERMES, COMPASS, RHIC, BELLE, GSI, would serve as an important check of our understanding of nucleon structure in terms of quark and gluon properties. CLAS12 Full acceptance, general purpose detector for high luminosity electron scattering experiments, is essential for high precision measurements of GPDs and TMDs in the valence region.