Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Similar documents
Left-invariant Einstein metrics

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

A note about invariant SKT structures and generalized Kähler structures on flag manifolds

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2008

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF TODA SYSTEMS ALEXANDER V. RAZUMOV AND MIKHAIL V. SAVELIEV

Twistor constructions of quaternionic manifolds and asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein Weyl spaces. Aleksandra Borówka. University of Bath

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

RIEMANN SURFACES: TALK V: DOLBEAULT COHOMOLOGY

Topic: First Chern classes of Kähler manifolds Mitchell Faulk Last updated: April 23, 2016

H-projective structures and their applications

Austere pseudo-riemannian submanifolds and s-representations

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

VINCENT PECASTAING. University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 1

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

September 27, :51 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE biswas-loftin. Hermitian Einstein connections on principal bundles over flat affine manifolds

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY

WICK ROTATIONS AND HOLOMORPHIC RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Notes on Lie Algebras

The Calabi Conjecture

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Recent developments in pseudo-riemannian holonomy theory

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Symplectic geometry of deformation spaces

Geometric Structures in Mathematical Physics Non-existence of almost complex structures on quaternion-kähler manifolds of positive type

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

The local geometry of compact homogeneous Lorentz spaces

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

Noncompact homogeneous Einstein manifolds attached to graded Lie algebras

Published as: Math. Ann. 295 (1993)

How to recognise a conformally Einstein metric?

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 30 Aug 2018

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

Holomorphic line bundles

How to recognize a conformally Kähler metric

Symplectic critical surfaces in Kähler surfaces

A new class of pseudodifferential operators with mixed homogenities

HARMONIC READING COURSE

C-PROJECTIVE COMPACTIFICATION; (QUASI )KÄHLER METRICS AND CR BOUNDARIES

THE HODGE DECOMPOSITION

Metrics and Holonomy

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

A Joint Adventure in Sasakian and Kähler Geometry

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 1

Ricci-flat metrics on the complexification of a compact rank one symmetric space

Some brief notes on the Kodaira Vanishing Theorem

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Invariant Distributions and Gelfand Pairs

HARMONIC MAPS INTO GRASSMANNIANS AND A GENERALIZATION OF DO CARMO-WALLACH THEOREM

Quaternionic Complexes

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Self-dual conformal gravity

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik Bonn

DIRAC STRUCTURES FROM LIE INTEGRABILITY

REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

7 Curvature of a connection

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Introduction to Extremal metrics

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

On para-norden metric connections

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX

The spectral action for Dirac operators with torsion

Homogeneous spaces admitting transitive semigroups

5 Constructions of connections

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Stable bundles with small c 2 over 2-dimensional complex tori

The Weitzenböck Machine

Transcription:

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1

The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey of recent results on para-complex geometry is given. It includes para-complex and generalized para-complex structures, para-hypercomplex (complex product structure) and 3-webs, almost para-hermitian and para-hermitian structures, para-kähler (bi-lagrangian) structures, para hyperkähler and para hyperkahler with torsion structures, para-quaternionic Kahler and para-quaterniuonic Kähler with torsion structures, para-cr and para-quaternionbic CR structures. 2

Para-complex structures on a real vector space The algebra of para-complex numbers is defined by C = R + er R 2, e 2 = 1. Para-complex structure in a vector space V : K : V V, K 2 = 1 such that V = V + + V, dim V + = dim V. Para-complexification of (V, K) is V C := V C. 3

Holomorphic and antiholomorphic subspaces are defined by V 1,0 = {v V C Kv = ev} = {v + ekv v V }, V 0,1 = {v V C Kv = ev} = {v ekv v V }, Then V C = V 1,0 V 0,1.

Exterior forms The dual space where (V ) C = V C = V 1,0 V 0,1, V 1,0 = {α V C, K α = eα} = {α + ek α α V }, V 0,1 = {α V C, K α = eα} = {α ek α α V }. Denote by p,q V C the subspace of V C spanned by α β, with α p V 1,0 and β q V 0,1. Then r V C = p+q=r p,q V C. 4

Para-Hermitian forms Definition 1 A para-hermitian form on V C is a map h : V C V C C such that: i) h is C-linear in the first entry and C-antilinear in the second entry; ii) h(w, Z) = h(z, W ). Definition 2 A para-hermitian symmetric form on V C is a symmetric C-bilinear form h : V C V C C such that h(v 1,0, V 1,0 ) = h(v 0,1, V 0,1 ) = 0, h(z, W ) = h(z, W ) for any Z, W V C. It is called non-degenerate if it has trivial kernel. If h(z, W ) is a para-hermitian symmetric form, then ĥ(z, W ) = h(z, W ) is a para-hermitian form. 5

Lemma 3 There exists a natural 1 1 correspondence between pseudo-euclidean metric g on a vector space V such that g(kx, KY ) = g(x, Y ), X, Y V and non-degenerate para-hermitian symmetric forms h = g C in V C, where g C is the natural extension of g to C-bilinear symmetric form. Moreover, the natural C-extension ω C of the two form ω = g K coincides with the (1, 1)- form g C K. 6

Para-complex manifolds Definition 4 A para-complex structure on a 2n-dimensional manifold M is a field K of paracomplex structures such that the ±1-eigendistributions T ± M are involutive. A map f : (M, K) (M, K ) between two para-complex manifolds is said to be para-holomorphic if df K = K df. (1) By Frobenius theorem, there are local coordinates (called adapted coordinates) (z α +, zα ) α = 1,..., n on M, such that T + M = span z+ α, α = 1,..., n T M = span { z α, α = 1,..., n }. 7

(p+, q )-decomposition of real differential forms ) The cotangent bundle T M splits as T M = T+ M T M, and, moreover, r T M = r p+q=1 p,q + T M, where p,q + T M = p (T+ M) q (T M). We put + = pr p+1,q d : p,q + (M) + (M) p+1,q + (M) = pr p,q+1 d : p,q + (M) + (M) p,q+1 + (M). Then exterior differential d can be decomposed as d = + + and, since d 2 = 0, we have 2 + = 2 = 0, + + + = 0. 8

Para-holomorphic coordinates Let (z+ α, zα ) be adapted local coordinates on (M, K). Then z α = zα + + zα + e zα + zα, α = 1,..., n. (2) 2 2 z α are para-holomorphic functions in the sense of (1) and the transition functions between two para-holomorphic coordinate systems are para-holomorphic. The real part x α and the imaginary part y α of the functions z α, given by x α = 1 2 (zα + z α ) = 1 2 (zα + + zα ), y α = 1 2e (zα z α ) = 1 2 (zα + zα ), are not necessarily real analytic. 9

Para-complex differential forms The para-complex tangent bundle T C M = T M C is decomposed into a direct sum T C p M = T 1,0 p M T 0,1 p M, (3) of para-holomorphic and para-anti-holomorphic bundles, where T 1,0 p M = {Z T C p M KZ = ez} = {X + ekx X T p M} T 0,1 p M = {Z T C p M KZ = ez} = {X ekx X T p M} are the eigenspaces of K with eigenvalues ±e. 10

Similar where 1-forms (T C ) M = 1,0 (M) 0,1 (M), dz α = dx α + edy α and dz α = dx α edy α form a basis of 1,0 (M) and 0,1 (M) dual to the bases z α and z α respectively. The last decomposition induces a splitting of the bundle r (T C ) M of para-complex r-forms on (M, K) given by r (T C ) M = p+q=r p,q (M). The sections of p,q (M) are called (p, q)-forms on the para-complex manifold (M, K). We have 1,1 + (M) = {ω 1,1 (M) ω = ω}. (4) 11

The exterior derivative d : r T M C r+1 T M C splits as d = +, where = pr p+1,q (M) d : p,q (M) p+1,q (M), = pr p,q+1 (M) d : p,q (M) p,q+1 (M), and 2 = 0, 2 = 0, + = 0. The operators, are related to +, by = 1 2 (( + + ) + e( + )) In particular, = 1 2 (( + + ) e( + )). = e +. 12

Dolbeault lemma (V.Cortes, C. Mayer, Th. Mohaupt, F.Sauressig) Lemma 5 Let (M, K) be a para-complex manifold and ω be a closed 2-form belonging to 1,1 + (M). Then locally there exists a realvalued function F (called potential) such that ω = + F = e F. The potential F is defined up to addition of a function f satisfying the condition + f = 0. 13

Para-Kähler manifolds Definition 6 A para-kähler manifold is given equivalently by: i) a pseudo-riemannian manifold (M, g) together with a skew-symmetric para-complex structure K which is parallel with respect to the Levi-Civita connection; ii) a symplectic manifold (M, ω) together with two complementary involutive Lagrangian distributions L ±. iii) a para-complex manifold (M, K) together with a symplectic form ω which belongs to 1,1 + (M); 14

Curvature and Ricci curvature of a para- Kähler manifold Proposition 7 The curvature R and the Ricci tensor S of a para-kähler metric g satisfy the following R(X, Y ) K = K R(X, Y ) R(KX, KY ) = R(X, Y ) S(KX, KY ) = S(X, Y ) for any vector fields X, Y X(M). We define the Ricci form ρ of the para-kähler metric g by ρ := Ric K. (5) It is a 2-form. Its para-complex extension ρ has type (1, 1) and in local para-holomorphic coordinates is given by ρ = 2e Ric αβ dz α dz β. 15

Proposition 8 The Ricci form of a para-kähler manifold is a closed (1, 1)-form and can be represented by In particular, ρ = e log(det(g αβ )). (6) Ric αβ = 2 log(det(g αβ )) z α z β. (7) 16

The canonical form of a para-complex manifold with a volume form Let (M, K, vol) be an oriented manifold with para-complex structure K and a (real) volume form vol. Let z = (z 1,..., z n ) be local para-holomorphic coordinates and (x α, y α ) corresponding real coordinates, where z α = x α + ey α. Then vol = V (z, z)dz 1 dz 1... dz n dz n (8) = U(x, y)dx 1 dy 1... dx n dy n. We may assume that U(x, y) > 0, as M is oriented. Then V (z, z) = ( 2e) n U(x, y). In particular, the function Ṽ = ( e) n V is positive. 17

Definition of the canonical 2-form Lemma 9 The formula ρ = e log (( e) n V ) (9) defines a real global closed 2-form of type (1, 1) on the oriented para-complex manifold (M, K, vol). The form ρ is called the canonical form of (M, K, vol). Corollary 10 Let (M, K, ω, g) be an oriented para-kähler manifold and denote by vol g the volume form associated with the metric g. Then the Ricci form ρ of the para-kähler manifold M coincides with the canonical form associated with the volume form vol g. In particular ρ depends only on the para-complex structure and the volume form. 18

A formula for the canonical form ρ in term of divergence Lemma 11 Let X, Y be real vector fields with div X = div Y = 0. Assume that the fields X c = X + ekx, Y c = Y + eky are paraholomorphic. Then 2ρ(X, Y ) = div (K[X, Y ]). (10) 19

Koszul formula for the canonical form ρ of a homogeneous para-complex manifold (M = G/H, K) with an invariant volume form vol. Given (M = G/H, K, vol). Let m be a complementary subspace to the Lie subalgebra h = LieH in the Lie algebra g = LieG. We identify m with the tangent space T o (G/H), o = eh and extend K o End(m) to an endomorphism K of g with kernel h. Then the pull back ρ of the canonical 2-form associated with (vol, K) at the point e G is given by 2ρ e (X, Y ) = ω i ( [ K[X, Y ], X i ] K[[X, Y ], X i ] ). In particular, ρ e = dψ, where ψ g is the Ad h -invariant 1-form on g given by ψ(x) = tr g/h ( ad KX Kad X ), X g. (11) The 1-form ψ g is called the Koszul form. 20

A description of homogeneous para- Kähler manifolds (M = G/H, ω, L ± ) of a semisimple Lie group We recall an important characterization of homogeneous manifolds M = G/H of a semisimple Lie group G which admit invariant para- Kähler structure (ω, L ± ). Theorem 12 (Hou-Deng-Kaneyuki-Nishiyama,97) A homogeneous manifold M = G/H of a semisimple group G admits an invariant para-kähler structure (ω, L ± ) iff it is a covering of the adjoint orbit Ad G h = G/Z G (h) of a semisimple element h g. 21

The proof follows from a result by Ozeki and Wakimoto (1972) that any polarization of a semisimple Lie algebra is a parabolic subalgebra and a classical result by Dixmier that the intersection of two parabolic subalgebras has maximal rank. Indeed,the subalgebras p ± := {X g X o L ± o } are polarizations for 1-form ξ g such that ω o = dξ, that is maximal isotropic subspaces with respect to ω o = dξ Λ 2 g. 22

Fundamental gradations of a semisimple Lie algebra A Z-gradation g = g k + +g 1 +g 0 +g 1 + +g k [g i, g j ] g i+j (12) of a (real or complex) semi-simple Lie algebra g is called fundamental if the subalgebra is generated by g 1. g = g k + + g 1 There exist unique element d g (called the grading element) such that Ad d g j = j Id. We set g ± = ±j>0 g j. Then g = g + g 0 + g + (associated decomposition) 23

Examples. Fundamental gradations of sl(v ) Let V be a (complex or real) vector space and V = V 1 + + V k a decomposition of V into a direct sum of subspaces. It defines a fundamental gradation sl(v ) = k i= k g i of the Lie algebra sl(v ), where g i = {A sl(v ), AV j V i+j, j = 1,..., k }. 24

A generalized Gauss decomposition A direct space decomposition g = n + h + n + is called a generalized Gauss decomposition if p ± := n ± + h are parabolic subalgebras with nilradical n ± and reductive part h. Proposition 13 Any generalized Gauss decomposition (ggd) is associated with a unique fundamental gradation i.e. n ± = g ±, h = g 0. 25

Invariant para-kähler structures and generalized Gauss decompositions Proposition 14 Let g = n +h+n + be a generalized Gauss decomposition associated with a fundamental gradation, defined by a grading element d g. Let G be a Lie group with the Lie algebra g and H a closed subgroup of G with LieH = h which preserves d g. Then M = G/H has an invariant para-complex structure K defined by K n ± = ± Id. Moreover, any Ad H -invariant element h h with Z g (h) = h defines an invariant symplectic form ω h on M = G/H (where ωo h = db h and B is the Killing form) which is consistent with K, i;.e. (K, ω) is an invariant para-kähler structure. Moreover, any invariant para-kähler structure cab be obtained by this construction. 26

Fundamental gradations of a complex semisimple Lie algebra g Let g = h + α R g α be a root space decomposition of a complex semisimple Lie algebra g with respect to a Cartan subalgebra h. We fix a system of simple roots Π = {α 1,, α l } R Any disjoint decomposition Π = Π 0 Π 1 of Π defines a fundamental gradation of g as follows. We define the function d : R Z by d Π 0 = 0, d Π 1 = 1, d(α) = k i d(α i ), α = k i α i. Then the fundamental gradation is given by g 0 = h+ α R, d(α)=0 g α, g i = α R, d(α)=i g α. Any fundamental gradation of g is conjugated to a unique gradation of such form. 27

Fundamental gradations of a real semisimple Lie algebra Any real semisimple Lie algebra ĝ is a real form of a complex semisimple Lie algebra γ, that is it is the fixed point set ĝ = g σ of some antilinear involution σ of g, i.e. an antilinear involutive map σ : g g, which is an automorphism of g as a Lie algebra over R. We can always assume that σ preserves a Cartan subalgebra h of g and induces an automorphism of the root system R. A root α R is called compact (or black) if σα = α. It is always possible to choose a system of simple roots Π = {α 1,, α l } such that, for any non compact root α i Π, the corresponding root σα i is a sum of one non-compact root α j Π and a linear combination of compact roots from Π. The roots α i and α j are called equivalent. 28

Theorem 15 (Djokovič ) Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, σ : g g an antilinear involution and g σ the corresponding real form. The gradation of g, associated with a decomposition Π = Π 0 Π 1, defines a gradation g σ = (g i ) σ of g σ if and only if Π 1 consists of non compact roots and any two equivalent roots are either both in Π 0 or both in Π 1.

Example. Fundamental gradations of g 2 The root system of the complex exceptional Lie algebra g 2 has the form R = {±ε i, ±(ε i ε j ), i, j =, 2, 3} where the vectors ε i satisfy ε 1 +ε 2 +ε 3 = 0, ε 2 i = 2/3, (ε i, ε j ) = 1/3, i j. Consider the system of simple roots Π = {α 1 = ε 2, α 2 = ε 2 ε 3 }. The corresponding system of positive roots is R + = {α 1, α 2, α 1 +α 2, 2α 1 +α 2, 3α 1 +α 2, 3α 1 +2α 2 }. There are three fundamental gradations for the complex Lie algebra g 2. 29

Calculation of the fundamental form ρ = dψ of a homogeneous para-complex manifold (M = G/H, K) associated with a generalized Gauss decomposition Now we compute the Koszul form for the homogeneous para-complex manifold (M = G σ /H σ, K M, vol), where M is a covering of an adjoint orbit of a real semisimple Lie group G σ, K M is the invariant para-complex structure defined by a gradation of the Lie algebra g σ and vol is an invariant volume form. First of all, we describe the Koszul form ψ on the Lie algebra g σ = g σ k + + gσ 1 + gσ 0 + gσ 1 + + gσ k. or, equivalently, its complex extension ψ to the complex Lie algebra g (defined by the same formula). 30

We choose a Cartan subalgebra a g 0 of the Lie algebra g and denote by R the root system of (g, a). Let Π = Π 0 Π 1, P = P 0 P 1 be the decomposition of a simple root system Π of the root system R which corresponds to the gradation and the corresponding decomposition of the fundamental weights. Let R + be the set of positive roots defined by the basis Π. We put R + 0 = {α R+ g α g 0 }.

The following lemma describes the Koszul form in terms of fundamental weights. Lemma 16 The 1-form ψ is equal to where δ g = ψ = 2(δ g δ h ) α R + α, δ h = α R + 0 and the linear forms on the Cartan subalgebra a are considered as linear forms on g which vanish on root spaces g α. α, 31

Proposition 17 Let Π = Π 0 Π 1 = {α 1,..., α l } be the simple root system (corresponding to the gradation) and denote by π i the fundamental weight corresponding to the simple root α i, namely 2 (π i, α j ) (α j, α j ) = δ ij. If P 1 = {π i1,..., π ir }, then the Koszul form ψ is equal to where ψ = 2 π P 1 n π π = 2 r h=1 a ih π ih, (13) a ih = 2 + b ih, with b ih = 2 (δh, α ih ) (α ih, α ih ) 0. (14) 32

The main theorem Theorem 18 Let R be a root system of a complex semisimple Lie algebra g with respect to a Cartan subalgebra a and g = g k + + g k the fundamental gradation associated with a decomposition Π = Π 0 Π 1 of a simple root system Π R. Let σ be an admissible antiinvolution of g which defines the graded real form g σ of g and ψ be the corresponding Koszul form on g. Let (M = G σ /H σ, K) be a homogeneous manifold of a real semisimple Lie group G σ with Lie algebra g σ such that the stability subalgebra h = g σ 0 and Hσ preserves the generalized Gauss decomposition. Denote by K the invariant para-complex structure on M associated with the ggd and by ρ = dψ the invariant symplectic form on M defined by dψ. Then for any λ 0 the pair (K, λρ) is an invariant para-kähler Einstein structure on M and this construction exhausts all homogeneous para- Kähler Einstein manifolds of real semisimple Lie groups. 33