Class 27: Block Diagrams

Similar documents
Chapter 8. Feedback Controllers. Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram for a stirred-tank blending system.

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

Process Control, 3P4 Assignment 6

Task 1 (24%): PID-control, the SIMC method

Process Control and Instrumentation Prof. A. K. Jana Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Overview of Control System Design

Subject: Introduction to Process Control. Week 01, Lectures 01 02, Spring Content

BITS-Pilani Dubai, International Academic City, Dubai Second Semester. Academic Year

Fundamental Principles of Process Control

Queen s University at Kingston. CHEE Winter Process Dynamics and Control. M. Guay. Quiz 1

Control of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes

CM 3310 Process Control, Spring Lecture 21

Process Dynamics, Operations, and Control Lecture Notes 2

CHAPTER 15: FEEDFORWARD CONTROL

Overview of Control System Design

CONTROL OF MULTIVARIABLE PROCESSES

Process Control Hardware Fundamentals

Process Control J.P. CORRIOU. Reaction and Process Engineering Laboratory University of Lorraine-CNRS, Nancy (France) Zhejiang University 2016

Process Control, 3P4 Assignment 5

CHAPTER 13: FEEDBACK PERFORMANCE

( ) ( = ) = ( ) ( ) ( )

Overview of Control System Design

SIMULATION SUITE CHEMCAD SOFTWARE PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS COURSE WITH CHEMCAD MODELS. Application > Design > Adjustment

Development of Dynamic Models. Chapter 2. Illustrative Example: A Blending Process

A Tuning of the Nonlinear PI Controller and Its Experimental Application

ChE 6303 Advanced Process Control

Process Control & Design

Solutions for Tutorial 5 Dynamic Behavior of Typical Dynamic Systems

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

Feedforward Control Feedforward Compensation

(Refer Slide Time: 1:42)

Feedback Control of a Water Heater

CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Solution to exam in PEF3006 Process Control at Telemark University College

Dr Ian R. Manchester

Basic Procedures for Common Problems

Control Lab. Thermal Plant. Chriss Grimholt

CHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING

Mathematical Modeling of Chemical Processes. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University

Root Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus - 1

Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies (Advanced Control) Cascade Control Time-Delay Compensation Inferential Control Selective and Override Control

Lab-Report Control Engineering. Proportional Control of a Liquid Level System

Chapter 2 Linear Feedback Control

بسمه تعالي کنترل صنعتي 2 دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده گروه کنترل دانشکده مهندسي برق دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران پاییس 90

Systems Engineering and Control

Solutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis

Theoretical Models of Chemical Processes

Exercise 8: Level Control and PID Tuning. CHEM-E7140 Process Automation

EXAMINATION INFORMATION PAGE Written examination

DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL

INTRODUCTION TO THE SIMULATION OF ENERGY AND STORAGE SYSTEMS

Solutions for Tutorial 4 Modelling of Non-Linear Systems

Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

Solutions for Tutorial 3 Modelling of Dynamic Systems

Closed Loop Identification Of A First Order Plus Dead Time Process Model Under PI Control

CHAPTER 7 MODELING AND CONTROL OF SPHERICAL TANK LEVEL PROCESS 7.1 INTRODUCTION

Integrator Windup

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies Chapter 16

PID controllers. Laith Batarseh. PID controllers

Development of Dynamic Models. Chapter 2. Illustrative Example: A Blending Process

ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317. G 1 (s) = 3 s + 6, G 2(s) = s + 2

CONSIM - MS EXCEL BASED STUDENT FRIENDLY SIMULATOR FOR TEACHING PROCESS CONTROL THEORY

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1EXAMINATION 2017/2018

Multiple Model Based Adaptive Control for Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Process

Systems Engineering/Process Control L1

Lecture 12. AO Control Theory

Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018

Experiment # 5 5. Coupled Water Tanks

Control and Monitoring of a High Recovery Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process

Process Control Exercise 2

Competences. The smart choice of Fluid Control Systems

Lesson 19: Process Characteristics- 1 st Order Lag & Dead-Time Processes

Alireza Mousavi Brunel University

Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)

CHEE 434/821 Process Control II Some Review Material

1 Goal: Use Mass Balances to Predict Control Corrections

EE 422G - Signals and Systems Laboratory

Control Introduction. Gustaf Olsson IEA Lund University.

An Improved Relay Auto Tuning of PID Controllers for SOPTD Systems

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Design Project

sc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11

Ch 14: Feedback Control systems

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

Control 2. Proportional and Integral control

Basic Analysis of Data

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS

Step input, ramp input, parabolic input and impulse input signals. 2. What is the initial slope of a step response of a first order system?

Model based control design

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e

EEL2216 Control Theory CT1: PID Controller Design

CHAPTER 3 TUNING METHODS OF CONTROLLER

Chapter 3: Block Diagrams and Signal Flow Graphs

Process Solutions. Process Dynamics. The Fundamental Principle of Process Control. APC Techniques Dynamics 2-1. Page 2-1

Guide to Selected Process Examples :ili3g eil;]iil

Control of Manufacturing Processes

Chapter 7 Control. Part Classical Control. Mobile Robotics - Prof Alonzo Kelly, CMU RI

Design of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system

Soft Computing Technique and Conventional Controller for Conical Tank Level Control

Transcription:

Class 7: Block Diagrams

Dynamic Behavior and Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems We no ant to consider the dynamic behavior of processes that are operated using feedback control. The combination of the process, the feedback controller, and the instrumentation is referred to as a feedback control loop or a closed-loop system. Block Diagram Representation To illustrate the development of a block diagram, e return to a previous eample, the stirred-tank blending process considered in earlier chapters.

Composition control system for a stirred-tank blending process (Fig..) (V,, and assumed to be constant) CT CC Controlled variable: Measured variable: Manipulated variable: Disturbance variable: Outlet concentration () Outlet concentration () Flo rate ( ) Inlet concentration ( ) 3

4 Process In section 4.3 the approimate dynamic model of a stirred-tank blending system as developed: dt d V ) ( ρ ) ( ) ( f f f f ss ss ss variables

5 here s W s X s X s V dt d V ) ( ρ ρ Combining partial fractions and deviation variables, s W s K s X s K s X τ τ K and K V,, ρ τ

Disturbance Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable Process Figure. Block diagram of the process. 6

Wanted: Transfer function for each piece of equipment - Please try to label variables, then transfer functions 7

Standard Labels D Y sp Y ~ sp - E P U Y u Y d Y Y m 8

Definitions Y controlled variable U manipulated variable D P disturbance variable (also referred to as load variable) controller output E error signal Y m Y sp measured value of Y set point Y u Y d G c G v G p G d G m K m change in Y due to U change in Y due to D controller transfer function transfer function for final control element (including K IP, if required) process transfer function disturbance transfer function transfer function for measuring element and transmitter steady-state gain for G m Y % sp internal set point (used by the controller) 9

Transfer Functions D G d Y sp Y ~ sp E P U Y u K m G c G v G P - Y d Y Y m G m 0

No back to our problem (Blending Tank) Need transfer functions for: CT CC

Modified Block Diagram D G d Y sp Y ~ sp E P U Y u K m G c G ip G v G P - P t Y d Y Y m G m Notes:. All variables are in deviation variables ecept E. All variables are in Laplace coordinates (i.e., Y (s)) 3. Pink boes need transfer functions

Composition Sensor-Transmitter (Analyzer) We assume that the dynamic behavior of the composition sensortransmitter can be approimated by a first-order transfer function: X m ( s) Km G m (-3) X s τ s Controller Suppose that an electronic proportional plus integral controller is used. From Chapter 8, the controller transfer function is G c m P s Kc (-4) E s τi s here P s and E(s) are the Laplace transforms of the controller output p ( t) and the error signal e(t). Note that p and e are electrical signals that have units of ma, hile K c is dimensionless. The error signal is epressed as 3

% (-5) e t t t or after taking Laplace transforms, sp m % (-6) E s X s X s sp The symbol % sp t denotes the internal set-point composition epressed as an equivalent electrical current signal. This signal is used internally by the controller. % sp ( t) is related to the actual composition set point sp ( t) by the composition sensortransmitter gain K m : m Thus K m sp (-7) % t K t X% sp X sp ( s) ( s) m sp K m (-8) 4

Current-to-Pressure (I/P) Transducer Because transducers are usually designed to have linear characteristics and negligible (fast) dynamics, e assume that the transducer transfer function merely consists of a steady-state gain K IP : Pt ( s) G ip KIP (-9) P s Control Valve As discussed in Section 9., control valves are usually designed so that the flo rate through the valve is a nearly linear function of the signal to the valve actuator. Therefore, a first-order transfer function usually provides an adequate model for operation of an installed valve in the vicinity of a nominal steady state. Thus, e assume that the control valve can be modeled as G v W s Kv P s τ s t v (-0) 5

Block diagram for the entire blending process composition control system (Fig.7) Done! 6

What about PID ith derivative on measurement? P P t c τ I 0 ( t) K e( t) e( t) dy dt ( s) K E( s) K τ sy ( s) c τ Is K c C τ D G (s) G (s) D m m ( s) Y ~ sp Ym E Y sp Y ~ sp E K m G - P G Y m 7

PID /Derivative on Measurement D G d Y sp Y ~ sp E P U Y u K m G PI G ip G v G P - P t Y d Y G deriv Y m G m 8

Your Homeork Problem. 9

Manipulated variable Problem. Disturbance Want to control c, not c TL c CT CC. First identify the controlled variable, manipulated variable, and disturbance variable. 0

Prob..

Problem. Want to control c, not c TL c CT Set point CC Derivative on measurement. Dra a block diagram similar to the one e did in class. My diagram has 9 boes for transfer functions, including the unit conversion on the set point (K m ). Also, you ill have a transfer function G TL for the transport delay in the transfer line. The time delay bo should be in the feedback loop, since it only represents the delay in measurement.