Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Similar documents
D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Introduction to Accelerators

Longitudinal Dynamics

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Putting it all together

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

Introduction to particle accelerators

Accelerators. There are some accelerators around the world Nearly all are for industrial (20 000) or clinical use (10 000)

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

Practical Lattice Design

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

Introduction to Collider Physics

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

COMBINER RING LATTICE

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

Particle physics experiments

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 9, Physics 663, lecture 2 1

Theory English (Official)

Status of Optics Design

Transverse Dynamics II

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Collider Rings and IR Design for MEIC

Physics at Accelerators

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Low Emittance Machines

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Accelerator Physics. Elena Wildner. Transverse motion. Benasque. Acknowldements to Simon Baird, Rende Steerenberg, Mats Lindroos, for course material

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

Lattice Design II: Insertions Bernhard Holzer, DESY

Simulation and Optimization of the Tevatron Accelerator

Engines of Discovery

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

LECTURE 7. insertion MATCH POINTS. Lattice design: insertions and matching

Beam Transfer Lines. Brennan Goddard CERN

Low Emittance Machines

Proposta per l'uso di DAFNE come allungatore d'impulso per il fascio di positroni del Linac

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

Basic Mathematics and Units

Accelerator Physics and Technologies for Linear Colliders University of Chicago, Physics 575

FODO Cell Introduction to OptiM

Optimization of CESR-c Optics for High Time-Integrated Luminosity

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

S9: Momentum Spread Effects and Bending S9A: Formulation

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Weak focusing I. mv r. Only on the reference orbit is zero

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Correction of β-beating due to beam-beam for the LHC and its impact on dynamic aperture

Why do we accelerate particles?

Study of Alternative Optics for the NLC Prelinac Collimation section

Practical Lattice Design

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Introductory slides: Ferrite. Ferrite

Pretzel scheme of CEPC

Historical developments. of particle acceleration

RF System Calibration Using Beam Orbits at LEP

Medical Linac. Block diagram. Electron source. Bending magnet. Accelerating structure. Klystron or magnetron. Pulse modulator.

Operational Experience with HERA

accelerator physics and ion optics summary longitudinal optics

Feasibility Study of Accumulator and Compressor for the 6-bunches SPL based Proton Driver

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Linear Imperfections Oliver Bruning / CERN AP ABP

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

HE-LHC Optics Development

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

Chromatic aberration in particle accelerators ) 1

accelerator physics and ion optics summary longitudinal optics

USPAS Accelerator Physics 2017 University of California, Davis

Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Non-Scaling Fixed Field Gradient Accelerator (FFAG) Design for the Proton and Carbon Therapy *

Beam Optics design for CEPC collider ring

Transcription:

Beam Dynamics D. Brandt, CERN D. Brandt 1

Some generalities D. Brandt 2

Units: the electronvolt (ev) The electronvolt (ev)) is the energy gained by an electron travelling, in vacuum, between two points with a voltage difference of 1 Volt. 1 ev = 1.602 10-19 Joule We also frequently use the electronvolt to express masses from E=mc 2 : 1 ev/c 2 = 1.783 10-36 kg D. Brandt 3

What is a Particle Accelerator? a machine to accelerate some particles! How is it done? Many different possibilities, but rather easy from the general principle: - + - + - + - + D. Brandt 4

Ideal linear machines (linacs) E Target - + - + - + - + Available Energy : E c.m. = m. (2+2γ) 1/2 = (2m.(m+E)) 1/2 with γ = E/E 0 Advantages: Single pass High intensity Drawbacks: Single pass Available Energy D. Brandt 5

Improved solution for E c.m. e - e + - + - + - + - + Available Energy : E c.m. = 2mγ = 2E with γ = E/E 0 Advantages: High intensity Drawbacks: Single pass Space required D. Brandt 6

Watch out! The difference between fixed target and colliding mode deserves to be considered in some detail: Fixed target mode: E c.m. (2mE) 1/2 Colliding mode: E c.m. 2E What would be the required beam energy to achieve E c.m. =14 TeV in fixed target mode? D. Brandt 7

Keep particles: circular machines Basic idea is to keep the particles in the machine for many turns. Move from the linear design To a circular one: Need Bending Need Dipoles! D. Brandt 8

Circular machines 1 (E c.m. ~ (me) 1/2 ) fixed target: cyclotron huge dipole, compact design, B = constant, low energy, single pass. D. Brandt 9

Circular machines 2 (E c.m. ~ (me) 1/2 ) fixed target: synchrotron varying B small magnets, high energy RF D. Brandt 10

Colliders (E c.m. =2E) Colliders with the same type of particles (e.g. p-p) require two separate chambers. The beam are brought into a common chamber around the interaction regions e - e + - + - + - + - + D. Brandt 11

Colliders (e + -e - ) et (p p) LHC LEP D. Brandt 12

Transverse Dynamics F = e (E + v x B) D. Brandt 13

Beam Dynamics (1) In order to describe the motion of the particles, each particle is characterised by: Its azimuthal position along the machine: s Its momentum: p (or Energy E) Its horizontal position: x Its horizontal slope: x Its vertical position: y Its vertical slope: y i.e. a sixth dimensional vector (s, p, x, x, y, y ) D. Brandt 14

Beam Dynamics (2) In an accelerator designed to operate at the energy E nom, all particles having (s, E nom, 0, 0, 0, 0) will happily fly through the center of the vacuum chamber without any problem. These are ideal particles. The difficulties start when: one introduces dipole magnets the energy E E nom or (p-p nom /p nom ) = Δp/p nom 0 either of x, x, y, y 0 D. Brandt 15

Circular machines: Dipoles Classical mechanics: B Equilibrium between two forces Lorentz force Centrifugal force F = e.(v x B) F = mv 2 /ρ evb = mv 2 /ρ p = m 0.c.(βγ) Magnetic rigidity: Bρ = mv/e = p/e Relation also holds for relativistic case provided the classical momentum mv is replaced by the relativistic momentum p D. Brandt 16

Why fundamental? Constraints: E and ρ given Magnets defined (B)( Constraints: E and B given Size of the machine (ρ)( Constraints: B and ρ given Energy defined (E)( D. Brandt 17

Dipoles (1): D. Brandt 18

Dipoles (2): D. Brandt 19

Ideal circular machine: Neglecting radiation losses in the dipoles Neglecting gravitation ideal particle would happily circulate on axis in the machine for ever! We need Focusing! Unfortunately: real life is different! Gravitation: Δy = 20 mm in 64 msec! Alignment of the machine Ground motion Limited physical aperture Field imperfections Energy error of particles and/or (x, x ) inj (x, x ) nominal Error in magnet strength (power supplies and calibration) D. Brandt 20

Focusing with quadrupoles F x = -g.x F y = g.y Force increases linearly with displacement. Unfortunately, effect is opposite in the two planes (H and V). Remember: this quadrupole is focusing in the horizontal plane but defocusing in the vertical plane! D. Brandt 21

Quadrupoles: D. Brandt 22

Focusing properties A quadrupole provides the required effect in one plane but the opposite effect in the other plane! Is it really interesting? D. Brandt 23

Alternating gradient focusing Basic new idea: Alternate QF and QD QF QD QF QD QF valid for one plane only (H or V)! D. Brandt 24

Alternating gradient focusing QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD D. Brandt 25

Alternating gradient focusing: Particles for which x, x, y, y 0 thus oscillate around the ideal particle but the trajectories remain inside the vacuum chamber! D. Brandt 26

Thin lens analogy of AG focusing x 1 0 x x out = -1/f 1 x in x Δx = x/f X out = x in + 0.x in x out = (-1/f).x in + x in f 1 L Drift = 0 1 More intuitively: 1-L/f L QF-Drift-QD = -L/f 2 1+L/f x 1 < x 2 Initial: x = x 0 x = 0 and L < f x 1 x 2 F x D. Brandt 27 QD QF

The concept of the «FODO cell» QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD L 4 L One complete oscillation in 4 cells 90 / cell μ = 90 D. Brandt 28

Circular machines (no errors!) The accelerator is composed of a periodic repetition of cells: L B D B F The phase advance per cell μ can be modified, in each plane, by varying the strength of the quadrupoles. The ideal particle will follow a particular trajectory, which closes on itself after one revolution: the closed orbit. The real particles will perform oscillations around the closed orbit. The number of oscillations for a complete revolution is called the Tune Q of the machine (Qx and Qy). D. Brandt 29

Regular periodic lattice: The Arc D. Brandt 30

Synchrotrons D. Brandt 31

The beta function β(s) (εβ) 1/2 The β-function is the envelope around all the trajectories of the particles circulating in the machine. The β-function has a minimum at the QD and a maximum at the QF, ensuring the net focusing effect of the lattice. It is a periodic function (repetition of cells). The oscillations of the particles are called betatron motion or betatron oscillations. D. Brandt 32

Phase space Select a particle in the beam being at 1 sigma (68%) of the distribution and plot its position vs. its phase (x vs. x ) at some location in the machine for many turns. X ideal X ε Is the emittance of the beam [mm mrad] ε describes the quality of the beam Measure of how much particle depart from ideal trajectory. β is a property of the machine (quadrupoles). Area = π.ε D. Brandt 33

Emittance conservation QF QD QF The shape of the ellipse varies along the machine, but its area (the emittance ε) remains constant at a given energy. D. Brandt 34

Why introducing these functions? The β function and the emittance are fundamental parameters, because they are directly related to the beam size (measurable( quantity!):! Beam size [m] σ x,y (s) = (ε.β x,y (s)) 1/2 σ (IP) = 17 μm at 7 TeV (β=0.55( m) The emittance ε characterises the quality of the injected beam (kind of measure how the particules depart from ideal ones). It is an invariant at a given energy. ε = beam property β = machine property (quads) D. Brandt 35

Off momentum particles: These are non-ideal particles, in the sense that they do not have the right energy, i.e. all particles with Δp/p 0 What happens to these particles when traversing the magnets? D. Brandt 36

Off momentum particles (Δp/p 0) Effect from Dipoles If Δp/p > 0, particles are less bent in the dipoles should spiral out! If Δp/p < 0, particles are more bent in the dipoles should spiral in! No! 25 Δp/p>0 D(x) There is an equilibrium with the restoring force of the quadrupoles Δp/p<0 Δp/p=0-25 D. Brandt 37

Dispersion In general: (E y β y ) 1/2 y (E x β x ) 1/2 Only extreme values of Δp/p are shown. x D(s).Δp/p Δp/p < 0 Δp/p = 0 Δp/p > 0 The vacuum chamber must accomodate the full width. VH: A y (s) = (E y β y (s)) 1/2 and 1/2 and HW: A x (s) = (E x β x (s)) 1/2 + D(s).Δp/p D. Brandt 38

Off momentum particles (Δp/p 0) Effect from Quadrupoles If Δp/p > 0, particles are less focused in the quadrupoles lower Q! If Δp/p < 0, particles are more focused in the quadrupoles higher Q! Particles with different momenta would have a different betatron tune Q=f(Δp/p)! Q<Q 0 Q>Q 0 Q=Q 0 D. Brandt 39

The chromaticity Q Particles with different momenta (Δp/p) would thus have different tunes Q. So what? unfortunately The tune dependence on momentum is of fundamental importance for the stability of the machine. It is described by the chromaticity of the machine Q : Q = ΔQ / (Δp/p) The chromaticity has to be carefully controlled and corrected for stability reasons. D. Brandt 40

The sextupoles (SF and SD) A SF sextupole basically «adds» focusing for the particles with Δp/p > 0, and «reduces» it for Δp/p < 0. The chromaticity is corrected by adding a sextupole after each quadrupole of the FODO lattice. Δx x 2 D. Brandt 41

Sextupoles: SPS D. Brandt 42

Chromaticity correction QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD QF QD SF1 SD1 SF2 SD2 SF1 SD1 SF2 SD2 SF1 SD1 The undesired effect of sextupoles on particles with the nominal energy can be avoided by grouping the sextupoles into «families». Nr. of families: N = (k * 180 )/μ = Integer e.g. 180 / 90 = 2 D. Brandt 43

Natural chromaticity Take a particle and slightly increase its momentum: Δp/p > 0 ΔQ Q < 0 Q < 0 Take a particle and slightly decrease its momentum: Δp/p < 0 ΔQ Q > 0 Q < 0 Q is always negative! D. Brandt 44

Tune vs. momentum Correction with 1 sextupole family: Bad! Off momentum particles rapidly cross the integer (Qy!). Correction with 2 sextupole families: Excellent! Tunes remain almost constant over the whole range of momentum! D. Brandt 45

Transverse stability of the beam: So, apparently, the tunes Q x and Q y have to be selected and controlled very accurately. Why this? LHC in collision: Q x = 64.31 Q y = 59.32 D. Brandt 46

Forbidden values for Q An error in a dipole gives a kick which has always the same sign! Integer Tune Q = N Forbidden! The perturbation adds up! 0 B Half-integer Tune Q = N + 0.5 O.K. for an error in a dipole! The perturbation cancels after each turn! 0 D. Brandt 47

Forbidden values for Q An error in a quadrupole gives a kick whose sign depends on x (F x) Half-integer Tune Q = N + 0.5 First turn: x>0 Forbidden! 0 The amplitude of the oscillation is steadily increasing! Second turn: x<0 What about a 1/3 integer tune? D. Brandt 48

1/3 integer Tune 2 1 4 Tune Q = N + 0.33 Forbidden! The amplitude of the oscillation increases every third turn! 3 One would come to similar conclusions for Q = 1/4, 1/5, D. Brandt 49

Tune diagram for leptons (5th order): Q y 1.5 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.3 1.25 Tune values (Qx and/or Qy) which are forbidden in order to avoid resonances 1.2 1.15 1.1 1.05 The lowest the order of the resonance, the most dangerous it is. 1 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 Q x D. Brandt 50

Tune diagram for protons Due to the energy spread in the beam, we have to accommodate an «area» rather than a point! 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 LHC 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.3 D. Brandt 51

In more details: Qy 0.3 0.28 0.26 9 th 4 th th & 8 th 11 th 7 th Different energy dependent effects (e.g. space charge) will modify the area when the energy is changed! 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 Q x 0.3 D. Brandt 52

Choice of the lattice: If you are working on a conventional machine,, then you are very likely to use a standard FODO lattice. If your synchrotron has insertions (injection, extraction, RF, low-β, experiments), then you will need an «Optics program» to adapt (match) these specific regions to the FODO/periodic cells. If you are working on a Synchrotron Light Source (very small emittance, insertion devices, FELs) you will opt for a special lattice. For such a case, the use of a dedicated «Optics program» is probably unavoidable. D. Brandt 53

The phase advance per cell μ Aperture expensive μ between 60 and 90 degrees. Closed orbit correction Chromaticity correction with a reasonable number of sextupole families σ = (βε)( 1/2 Some phase advances are advantageous for the lattice design (e.g. 60 or 90 ) E. Wilson s lecture, CAS Sesimbra 2002 60 < μ > 90 D. Brandt 54

More general case You will need a dedicated «Optics program» to compute the lattice of your machine (e.g. MAD-X). This applies for «special» synchrotrons like the Synchrotron Light Sources, where FODO lattices are not optimal as far as the required beam parameters are concerned. In any case Get the correct Optics Predict the performance Match your insertions. Correct the chromaticity Compensate coupling Compute Tunes vs. Momentum Perform tracking with errors Evaluate the dynamic aperture D. Brandt 55

A few useful checks Although the «Optics code» will provide you all the required parameters, it is always recommended to perform a few very basic checks (garbage IN, garbage OUT the program does what YOU asked it to do). Useful checks: <β> R/Q α 1/Q 2 <D> = αr R/Q 2 γ tr Q D. Brandt 56

Summary for the transverse planes: A particle is described by its position and its slope (x, x ) and (y, y ) The circular trajectory is achieved with dipoles. The particles are kept together in the chamber with quadrupoles. The particles perform betatron oscillations around the closed orbit. The number of oscillations per turn (the tune Q) has to be carefully selected in order to avoid resonances. The phase advance per cell (μ) can be modified with quadrupoles. The natural chromaticity of the machine Q (<0) is compensated with sextupoles. D. Brandt 57

What type of particles? The choice of the type of particles is intimately linked to the dedicated application. For high energy circular machines, synchrotron radiation and the available magnet strength will be the important parameters. Possible candidates: Electrons and/or positrons (synchrotron radiation in circular machines) Protons (magnet strength) Antiprotons, neutrinos (available intensities) Ions (sources) Muons (future machines) D. Brandt 58

Where are we? We have covered the transverse beam dynamics and we have learned that, essentially,, the machine is composed of a periodic repetition of dipoles, quadrupoles and sextupoles. Is there still anything missing? A system to accelerate the particles A system to get efficient collisions D. Brandt 59