TERRITORIAL COHESION MEASUREMENT AT THE REGIONAL SCALE. A METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL AND APPLICATION IN ANDALUSIA

Similar documents
16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update. 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

I. INTRODUCTION. 1 Regulation EU No 1303/2013 on the Common Provisions on the ESI Funds.

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

How to measure Territorial Cohesion and Cooperation?

The National Spatial Strategy

European Regional and Urban Statistics

November 29, World Urban Forum 6. Prosperity of Cities: Balancing Ecology, Economy and Equity. Concept Note

General considerations of regional policy

Tackling urban sprawl: towards a compact model of cities? David Ludlow University of the West of England (UWE) 19 June 2014

National SDG Data Hubs: Statistical integration and geographic disaggregation (Philippines)

Third Cohesion report February 2004

BUILDING SOUND AND COMPARABLE METRICS FOR SDGS: THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE OECD DATA AND TOOLS FOR CITIES AND REGIONS

POPULATION AND TERRITORY. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL PRODUCTION IN SPAIN ( )

Towards an International Data Set for MST

Building the Sustainable Network of Settlements on the Caspian Sea Region of Kazakhstan

Together towards a Sustainable Urban Agenda

Contents: LEVANTE DE ALMERÍA A INFORMATION SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM RESULTS

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

Declaration Population and culture

DETERMINE OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN IZMIR

Entrepreneurship on islands and other peripheral regions. Specific Contract No 6511 implementing Framework contract No CDR/DE/16/2015/

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

Correlation of Neighborhood Map Machine to Grade 1 Ontario Social Studies Curriculum

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Poland, European Territory, ESPON Programme Warsaw, 2 July 2007 STRATEGY OF THE ESPON 2013 PROGRAMME

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning in Preparing Territorial Development Strategies

International Guidelines on Access to Basic Services for All

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

CCDR-N A SMART INSTITUTION

SPATIAL INEQUALITIES OF HABITABILITY IN HERITAGE CITIES. THE APPLICATION OF MONITORING INDICATORS TO THE CITIES OF SAN GABRIEL AND SANGOLQUI (ECUADOR)

Measuring Poverty. Introduction

Integrated Strategies in regional development

Analysis of travel-to-work patterns and the identification and classification of REDZs

Regional Plan 4: Integrating Ecosystem Services Mapping into Regional Land Use Planning

CARTOGRAPHY OF TERRITORIAL VULNERABILITY TO FLOODING RISK. ADAPTED PROPOSAL TO THE EUROPEAN FLOODS DIRECTIVE AND DERIVED LEGISLATION

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

Vincent Goodstadt. Head of European Affairs METREX European Network

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

Land Use Planning and Agriculture: Austrian Experiences and Challenges I

The view of Europaforum Northern Sweden concerning the future of EU cohesion policy

Shetland Islands Council

National planning report for Denmark

Sustainable development of the Greek islands

UNCTAD Single-year Expert Meeting on Tourism s Contribution to Sustainable Development

National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) Policy Coordination and Advisory Service

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ( )

Opportunities and challenges of HCMC in the process of development

European spatial policy and regionalised approaches

r10_summary.qxd :19 Page 245 ABOUT THE BOOK

New Prospects for Peripheral Rural Regions Helmut Hiess Glasgow, 19th of May 2010

Legal problems of environmental management. Spatial planning and space management. M. Gajewski 2014 / 2015

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

Background to the PFRA European Overview - UC9810.5b

RURAL AND URBAN MUNICIPALITIES IN THE REGIONS OF LATVIA DEVELOPMENT TENDENCIES AND CHALLENGES

Measurement of the Urban-Housing Deficit:

CEMAT results - over the years

Role of SF-MST. A summary of SF-MST

Urban and rural poles in positive interrelations

Monitoring of regional development in the Alps by means of indicators

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

Regional collaboration & sharing: pathway to sustainable, just & inclusive cities in Europe

COSTA RICA Limon City-Port Project

Topic 4: Changing cities

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Transnational SWOT Analysis

ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES IN REGIONS AND CITIES: MEASURES AND POLICIES NOTE FOR THE WPTI WORKSHOP, 18 JUNE 2013

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

a national geological survey perspective François ROBIDA BRGM (French Geological Survey)

CURRICULUM VITAE JAVIER GUTIÉRREZ

DEFINING AND MEASURING WORLD-METRO REGIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS

GIS (GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS) AS A FACILITATION TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Plan4all (econtentplus project)

PURR: POTENTIAL OF RURAL REGIONS UK ESPON WORKSHOP Newcastle 23 rd November Neil Adams

Population. Date established: 29 October EGTC: Established on 25 August 2009 The Euroregion s legal and administrative arm

Economic and Social Council

BOOK REVIEWS. ESPON Atlas: Territorial Dimensions of the Europe 2020 Strategy. ESPON 2013 Programme, Luxembourg, 2013, 66 p. ISBN

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

The Euroregion, which puts into practice the determination for active cooperation, has led to concrete actions such as:

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

Pathways. Pathways through the Geography Major

Sustainable tourism in for Sustaibale Danang

Taking into account people with special needs

Possibilities for applying ES assessment results in spatial planning in Latvia

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services

Presentation by Thangavel Palanivel Senior Strategic Advisor and Chief Economist UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia-Pacific

PROTOCOL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION OF 1991 RELATING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Economic Benefit Study on Value of Spatial Information Australian Experience

BIG IDEAS. Area of Learning: SOCIAL STUDIES Urban Studies Grade 12. Learning Standards. Curricular Competencies

Measuring Disaster Risk for Urban areas in Asia-Pacific

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Smart City Governance for effective urban governance. David Ludlow Assoc. Professor European Smart Cities University of the West of England, Bristol

Assessment of Sustainable Land Use within the Town Planning Process Experiences with a Multi Criteria Approach (MCA)

5 th DRAFT OF THE ICOMOS CHARTER ON CULTURAL ROUTES (September, 2005)

Governance and Urban Nexus: Closing the gaps

COSTA RICA Limon City-Port Project

Transcription:

Boletín Territorial de la Asociación cohesion measurement de Geógrafos at Españoles the regional N.º scale. 68-2015, A methodological págs. 455-459 proposal and application in Andalusia I.S.S.N.: 0212-9426 TERRITORIAL COHESION MEASUREMENT AT THE REGIONAL SCALE. A METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL AND APPLICATION IN ANDALUSIA Mª Fernanda Pita López Departamento de Geografía Física y Análisis Geográfico Regional. Universidad de Sevilla. mfpita@us.es Belén Pedregal Mateos Departamento de Geografía Humana. Universidad de Sevilla. bpedregal@us.es I. INTRODUCTION Territorial cohesion is one of the political objectives that are clearly shared by the Member States of the European Union. This has lead to a great advancement in its definition on the basis of several initiatives such as the consultation carried out through the publication of the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion (CE, 2008; CRPM, 2008). However, it is still considered an ambiguous and polysemic concept that still needs to be precisely defined in its components for it to become operational for the purposes of public policies. From this perspective, in this article an approach for the analysis of the territorial cohesion concept - and its measurement at the regional scale - is proposed, based on the experience of the Territorial Development Reports of Andalusia. The analysis of the territorial cohesion at the regional scale faces the same problems as any other scale - among them, the definition of the term but also encounters two difficulties that are specific to this geographical scale. The first difficulty refers to the need to define territorial units as a starting point to analyse territorial cohesion, as was done in the European Union for countries or regions (NUTS2 units) or at a national scale, in which regions are also the basic units. The second difficulty is the lack of sufficient and adequate information about development and territorial cohesion at each particular scale. All this justifies the need to draft methodological proposals to tackle these problems. Based on these premises, the goal of this article is making a methodological proposal to assess the degree of territorial cohesion at the regional scale, as well as illustrating it with its application in Andalusia. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles N.º 68-2015 455

Mª Fernanda Pita López & Belén Pedregal Mateos II. OPERATIONALIZING THE NOTION OF TERRITORIAL COHESION For the purposes of this paper by territorial cohesion we mean a set of factors that attract the components of a territory to keep them united and balanced, neutralizing the possible effect of centrifuge forces that could divide them. Based on this definition, it was assumed that the indicators for its measurements should reflect the three following basic components (Collado, 2009): (1) equal opportunities and equity, that make up an essentially economic element; (2) the sense of belonging to the same community or identification in a common project, which has a mainly political dimension; (3) the interrelations between the different territories, in an institutional and socio-cultural context. (1) Equal opportunities and /or equity are the fundamental glue for territorial cohesion. They involve the physical articulation of the territory and, at the same time, territorial justice. They are usually measured according to three essential components: a) infrastructure and transport, that ensure connectivity and allow for the physical territorial articulation; b) accessibility of services and facilities, that guarantee equal opportunities and, as a result, territorial justice; c) a balanced and harmonious territorial development without excessive inequalities and disparities, that would hinder cohesion. (2) The identification with a common project is also an element of uttermost importance for territorial cohesion and it is usually assessed based on the citizen s sense of belonging to a community. In order to understand the degree of territorial cohesion in those territories that are still under construction - as the European Union may be defined - and in those where the current territorial model of the State is being questioned, such as in Spain, it is essential to monitor the degree of citizen identification with a common project through indicators. In other territories that do not meet any of the two previous criteria, such as Andalusia, this component is irrelevant. (3) The interrelationship between different territories is the third component that defines territorial cohesion, which is all the more intense the more numerous relations between different territorial units. These relations can be personal or institutional and especially important are those that serve as an inter-territorial solidarity mechanism due to their marked cohesive power; the EU regional cohesion funds could play this role. No equivalent mechanism exists within the Spanish regions and hardly any detailed studies exist about the interrelations within regions, all of which makes the inclusion of this component in our analysis very difficult. A first interesting attempt to fill in this gap are the works on territorial cooperation in Andalusia by Feria et al. (2005, 2007) and Feria (2011). Based on these premises, in this paper, priority was given to indicators of equal opportunities and equity that are also the best indicators of territorial cohesion as a whole. In fact, territorial cohesion as a political objective of the European Union, aims to pursue more harmonious, balanced and efficient development, as well as achieving the economic convergence of different territories. III. METHODOLOGY The analysis of territorial cohesion in Andalusia will focus on two basic components that describe equal opportunities for citizens and businesses, access to transport and hospi- 456 Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles N.º 68-2015

Territorial cohesion measurement at the regional scale. A methodological proposal and application in Andalusia tal care. To these two, a third component was added that refers to the degree of territorial balance: the disparities in the development level between different territories. As regards access to hospital care and transport, mean values were used as calculated at the sub-regional scale in the Third Report on Territorial Development of Andalusia, IDTA (Díaz, García and Zoido, 2011). The development disparities were analysed based on the indicators for territorial development derived from the same Report (Pita and Pedregal, 2011b). These indicators are aggregate sub-regional indices that measure the achievement of the territorial development goals with respect to the three main environmental, economic and social components. A total of 8 aggregate indices were defined, of which 3 refer to the environmental component, 2 to the economic component and 3 to the social component (see Table 1). Table 1 INDICATORS USED TO MEASURE THE TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OF ANDALUSIA Component/ Indicator Environmental Objectives and aggregate indices 1. Environmental quality Variables Number of days with bad or very bad air quality Ecological status and risk of non-compliance with the WFD objectives for surface and transition waters Parameters measured Air quality Water quality Soil quality 2. Sustainability Greenhouse Gases Emissions Sustainability to cope with climate change % of agricultural land with high or very high risk of water erosion Sustainability to cope with soil loss 3. Smart environmental management Total water demand/ effective rainfall ratio Sustainable water use % protected areas and SCIs Protected areas Equivalent population with wastewater treatment as a percentage of total equivalent population Installed power from renewable energy sources Waste water treatment Renewable energy Economic 4. Competitiveness Business electricity consumption Economic dynamism Company investments in R&D funded by CDTI (Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial) Number of patents and utility models 2000-2007 /number of undertakings 2007 Innovation efforts Innovation efforts 5. Employment Employees Employment Number of jobs in competitive sectors/total number of jobs Industrial employment location quotient Jobs in tourism/total number of jobs Social 6. Welfare Declared net average income Income Standardized Mortality Ratio Outcomes of innovative activities Specialization in competitive sectors Industrial specialization Tourist specialization Health % of sub-regional population with libraries and/or cinema in their municipality Socio-cultural facilities 7. Equity % of population aged 65 and over that receives a non-contributory retirement pension Social cohesion due to low proportion of vulnerable groups 8. Socio-cultural integration Source: Pita and Pedregal (2011b). % economic migrants /total population Social cohesion due to low proportion of vulnerable groups % of female councillors in local government Gender equal opportunities % average participation rate in the local elections Public participation Cultural and sports associations per 1000 inhabitants Association networks Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles N.º 68-2015 457

Mª Fernanda Pita López & Belén Pedregal Mateos Finally, in order to better define the analysis of disparities in the development level, a set of variables were chosen as especially indicative of socioeconomic development and the Gini coefficient was applied to them. These variables are: the declared net income, the total number of jobs, the total number of competitive jobs, the total electricity consumption and the electricity consumption by businesses. These data come originally from the Andalusian Multi-territorial Information System (SIMA, continuously updated), but they have been extracted directly from the chapters drafted by the different authors of the mentioned Third IDTA Report. IV. MAIN FINDINGS IV.1. Applicability and functionality of the method for the regional scales At the regional scale, the studies on territorial cohesion have to face a two-fold problem: to identify smaller territorial units on which to apply the analysis and to find the necessary pieces of information to pursue the analysis. Concerning the first problem, the two smaller existing administrative units in Spain are the province with too aggregate and heterogeneous data and the municipality - with too disaggregate data. As a result, an intermediate unit must be identified that can be used for the purposes of the analysis of territorial cohesion. In most Spanish regions, sub-regional units have been defined for different purposes, though we are not aware of any case in which the purpose was the study of territorial cohesion and this issue is worth pursuing. In our case we opted for a specific sub-regional classification with 63 territorial units, which have allowed us to sufficiently detail the levels of development and territorial cohesion. Concerning the data collection, as they were not available at this particular sub-regional scale, it was necessary to use the information provided at the municipal scale and subsequently aggregate it. However, most of the relevant information for the development assessment (e.g. gross internal product or energy consumption) is not available at the municipal scale and this limits the analysis, although it opens up a great field for research and institutional work aimed at producing such information. In the Third IDTA Report, published in December 2011, most of the information available at the time of its drafting refers to 2006-2008. In this respect, it is imperative to explore more agile and cooperative information systems, looking for synergies among different initiatives. The indicators used in this paper were provided by the previous publication of the Territorial Development Report for Andalusia and had in turn been defined based on a literature review on territorial development and its application with the available statistical information and consensus among the authors of the Report. As a result, the methodological proposal on the measurement of territorial cohesion at the regional scale would include: a) the elaboration of indicators of territorial development and the selection of variables especially indicative of development at the municipal scale; b) the aggregation of such indicators and variables at the sub-regional scale selected for this purpose; c) the analysis of territorial cohesion on the basis of the dispersion of such indicators and the concentration indices applied to the development proxies; d) the completion of the analysis with the treatment of the variables used as territorial justice and equity indica- 458 Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles N.º 68-2015

Territorial cohesion measurement at the regional scale. A methodological proposal and application in Andalusia tors, such as the access to services, facilities or transport; e) the development of indicators to measure social and institutional cooperation to complement the previous analysis; f) in communities with a lack of identification with a common project these problems should be analyzed as an addition to this proposal and indicators of social and institutional cooperation should also be designed to monitor territorial cohesion. IV.2. Territorial cohesion levels in Andalusia In Andalusia, the main finding is that the sense of belonging to a community and equal opportunities of different territories, as far as access to transport and basic services are concerned, are not a problem. The main problems are linked to the lack of equity in certain indicators, especially the economic ones and in particular those linked with competitiveness. In these aspects important imbalances exist in the region, given the concentration of competitive activities in very few centres. This is an important feature that should be taken into account in the design of policies aimed at economic convergence and integration. The economic imbalances negatively reflect the environmental imbalances. It is in the environmental context where the main strengths of the region can be found: good indicators in most of the areas but with clearly negative values in those enclaves in which economic development is higher. This highlight an excessive coupling between economic development and environmental quality in the region, against which measures should be taken. The reduction of the environmental problems in the areas with higher levels of development is urgent and, as the environment is one of our best territorial assets, it is also imperative to enhance development based on this environmental heritage, which would in turn contribute to a shift in the productive model, to which not only Andalusia, but the whole of Spain aspires. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles N.º 68-2015 459