ALGEBRAIC PROPERTIES OF THE LATTICE R nx

Similar documents
11 Annihilators. Suppose that R, S, and T are rings, that R P S, S Q T, and R U T are bimodules, and finally, that

ON NIL SEMI CLEAN RINGS *

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

MV-algebras and fuzzy topologies: Stone duality extended

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

g 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M.

LECTURE 4 LECTURE OUTLINE

FIXED POINT THEOREMS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS OF METRIC COMPLETENESS. Tomonari Suzuki Wataru Takahashi. 1. Introduction

G. de Cooman E. E. Kerre Universiteit Gent Vakgroep Toegepaste Wiskunde en Informatica

Folland: Real Analysis, Chapter 4 Sébastien Picard

Common idempotents in compact left topological left semirings

1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces

That is, there is an element

Subrings and Ideals 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 SUBRING

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d

II - REAL ANALYSIS. This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define

BANACH SPACES IN WHICH EVERY p-weakly SUMMABLE SEQUENCE LIES IN THE RANGE OF A VECTOR MEASURE

A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND

An algebraic approach to Gelfand Duality

On the uniform Opial property

Introduction to Algebraic and Geometric Topology Week 3

Tropical matrix algebra

Appendix A. Definitions for Ordered Sets. The appendices contain all the formal definitions, propositions and proofs for

(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X.

Large deviation convergence of generated pseudo measures

Criteria for existence of semigroup homomorphisms and projective rank functions. George M. Bergman

1. Group Theory Permutations.

(a + b)c = ac + bc and a(b + c) = ab + ac.

Introduction to generalized topological spaces

Characterizing integral domains by semigroups of ideals

Provenance Semirings. Todd Green Grigoris Karvounarakis Val Tannen. presented by Clemens Ley

THE LATTICE OF SUBVARIETIES OF SEMILATTICE ORDERED ALGEBRAS

MATH 102 INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS. 1. Some Fundamentals

B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces

Linear maps. Matthew Macauley. Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University Math 8530, Spring 2017

On Monoids over which All Strongly Flat Right S-Acts Are Regular

We will begin our study of topology from a set-theoretic point of view. As the subject

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS

Notes for Functional Analysis

In Theorem 2.2.4, we generalized a result about field extensions to rings. Here is another variation.

DYNAMICAL CUBES AND A CRITERIA FOR SYSTEMS HAVING PRODUCT EXTENSIONS

The Lebesgue Integral

Topological dynamics: basic notions and examples

TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS

ITERATIVE SCHEMES FOR APPROXIMATING SOLUTIONS OF ACCRETIVE OPERATORS IN BANACH SPACES SHOJI KAMIMURA AND WATARU TAKAHASHI. Received December 14, 1999

Integral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma

The wave model of metric spaces

THE AUTOMORPHISM GROUP OF A SHIFT OF LINEAR GROWTH: BEYOND TRANSITIVITY

LECTURE 4: GOING-DOWN THEOREM AND NORMAL RINGS

Lecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).

René Bartsch and Harry Poppe (Received 4 July, 2015)

Convergence Theorems of Approximate Proximal Point Algorithm for Zeroes of Maximal Monotone Operators in Hilbert Spaces 1

A CLOSURE SYSTEM FOR ELEMENTARY SITUATIONS

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi

SPECTRAL-LIKE DUALITY FOR DISTRIBUTIVE HILBERT ALGEBRAS WITH INFIMUM

On the structure of maximal non-finitely generated ideals of ring and Cohen s theorem

Primary Decompositions of Powers of Ideals. Irena Swanson

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter

Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal

Characterisation of Accumulation Points. Convergence in Metric Spaces. Characterisation of Closed Sets. Characterisation of Closed Sets

Math Introduction to Modern Algebra

The prime spectrum of MV-algebras based on a joint work with A. Di Nola and P. Belluce

OTTO H. KEGEL. A remark on maximal subrings. Sonderdrucke aus der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

A Note on Finitely Generated Multiplication Semimodules over Commutative Semirings

Exercise Solutions to Functional Analysis

MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION. Problem 1

2. ETALE GROUPOIDS MARK V. LAWSON

On a quasi-ordering on Boolean functions

Contents: 1. Minimization. 2. The theorem of Lions-Stampacchia for variational inequalities. 3. Γ -Convergence. 4. Duality mapping.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 10. Metric Spaces.

General Mathematics Vol. 16, No. 1 (2008), A. P. Madrid, C. C. Peña

6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings

Introduction Non-uniqueness of factorization in A[x]... 66

SENSITIVITY AND REGIONALLY PROXIMAL RELATION IN MINIMAL SYSTEMS

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

THE NUMBER OF LOCALLY RESTRICTED DIRECTED GRAPHS1

CW complexes. Soren Hansen. This note is meant to give a short introduction to CW complexes.

Topological vectorspaces

A note on Derivations of Commutative Rings

CONTINUITY. 1. Continuity 1.1. Preserving limits and colimits. Suppose that F : J C and R: C D are functors. Consider the limit diagrams.

First Results for a Mathematical Theory of Possibilistic Processes

Infinite Galois theory

ON THE SUBGROUPS OF TORSION-FREE GROUPS WHICH ARE SUBRINGS IN EVERY RING

TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY

Key Renewal Theory for T -iid Random Fuzzy Variables

Math 711: Lecture of September 7, Symbolic powers

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices

On the filter theory of residuated lattices

Definable Extension Theorems in O-minimal Structures. Matthias Aschenbrenner University of California, Los Angeles

Extreme points of compact convex sets

Topologies, ring norms and algebra norms on some algebras of continuous functions.

MATH 117 LECTURE NOTES

Math 4317 : Real Analysis I Mid-Term Exam 1 25 September 2012

Universal Algebra for Logics

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

MAS3706 Topology. Revision Lectures, May I do not answer enquiries as to what material will be in the exam.

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra

Transcription:

CHAPTER 6 ALGEBRAIC PROPERTIES OF THE LATTICE R nx 6.0 Introduction This chapter continues to explore further algebraic and topological properties of the complete lattice Rnx described in Chapter 5. We also investigate certain algebraic structures that can be formed on the lattice Rnx under various fuzzy set theoretic operations. These investigations are valuable for a deeper understanding of the theory of ordered possibility distributions and also for obtaining further useful results regarding the theory. Throughout this chapter, Rnx denotes the complete distributive lattice of ordered possibility distributions with bounds OR =(I, 0,..., 0) and IR=(l, 1,..., 1) 6.1 Further algebraic properties of R "x In this section, we investigate further algebraic properties of Rnx w.r.t. different topologies on it. Throughout this section, Px denotes the metric on R nx defined in Chapter 5. 6.1.1 Proposition R is a topological lattice (See: Def. (1.1.16)) in its metric topology induced by nx the metric Px. As any metric lattice is a topological lattice in its metric topology (See: Result (1.1.17)), the result follows.

6.1.2 Proposition Let d, be a metric on the lattice Rnx defined by d,(r, t) = y$ lri - $1 ;r, t E Rnx Then d, is a complete metric on Rnx. The result can be easily verified. 6.1.3 Proposition The metrics Px and 4, defined on Rnx are equivalent in the sense that they give rise to same family of open sets. Let SS(r), 6 > 0 be an open sphere in the metric space (Rnx, P, ) If $(r) is an open sphere in the metric space (Rnx, d,), then = [ri - til (log,i - log2(i - 1)) < a log,n

Thus for every S: (r). 2 > 0 there exists Sg(r) with 5 = a(l0g 2n - 1% 2(n- 1)) such that Ss(r) c ~:(r) Thus Px and d, are equivalent rnetrics on Rnx and hence they induce same topology on Rnx. 6.1.4 Proposition The topology on Rnxinduced by d, is the order topology (See: Def. (1.1.15)) on Rnx. It is enough to prove that a net { a r) in Rnx converges to r E Rnx in the order topology iff { a r) converges to r w.r.t. the metric d,. Let { a r) be a net in Rnx which converges to r in Rnx w.r.t the order topology on R nx ' a belongs to any directed index set. a r + r in the order topology e lirninf ar =lirnsup ar =r e lirninf ari=lirnsupari=ri V~EN,

G liminf)ar,-r,\=limsuplari-rii=o b'i~n, G lim inf max 1 a ri -ri I= lim sup max 1 a r, -ri 1 = 0 i EN,, i EN" G lim inf dx(a r, r) = lim sup dx(a r, r) = 0 G a r + r in the metric topology induced by dx. Hence the result. 6.1.5 Corollary The metric topology induced by PX on Rnx is equivalent to the order topology on R "x' An immediate consequence of Prop. (6.1.3) and Prop. (6.1.4). 6.1.6 Corollary Rnx is a topological lattice w.r.t. the order topology on Rnx. As the order topology on Rnx is equivalent to the metric topology on Rnx induced by the metric Px, the result follows fiom Prop.(6.1.1)

6.1.7 Proposition Rnx satisfies the infinite distributive laws. Since any complete distributive lattice which is a topological lattice under order convergence satisfies the infinite distributive laws(see: Result (1.1.18)), the result follows. 6.1.8 Remark The above result can be obtained directly. For any set { a r) and any t in Rnx, the infinite distributive laws t A (V ar) = V(t A ar) a a tv (A ar) = A (tvar) a a hold in Rnx as they hold in the case of real numbers in [0, 11 w.r.t. arbitrary maximum and arbitrary minimum. 6.1.9 Proposition R is both Brouwerian and dually Brouwerian. "X As any complete lattice which satisfies the infinite distributive laws is both Brouwerian and dually Brouwerian (See: Def. (1.1.19) and Result (1.1.20)), the result follows.

6.1.10 Remark R is both Brouwerian and dually Brouwerian.. For any given elements, "X r = (r,,..., rn), t = (t,,..., tn) in Rnx, the greatest element t: r of the set. {x Rnx : r /\ x 5 t) is given by t:r= a = (a,,..., a,) E R wherefori EN", "X 1 if i=l a,, if ti > ri The least element r:t of the set. {x Rnx : r v x 2 t) is given by. r: t = p = (PI,..., P,) R where for i E "X N,,, 1 ifi=l if ti 5 ri where P, + = 0 ti if ti > ri 6.1.11 Definition Let r, t E Rnx. Then for any A. [O, I], the hction A r + (1- )t defined by (A r + (1 - A )t) (x) = A r(x) + (1 - A )t (x) ; x E "X is called a convex linear combination of r and t.

6.1.12 Proposition If r, t E Rnx are not comparable w.r.t. the partial order relation ' 5 ' on the lattice Rnx, then for no A, p E (0, I), A+ p, hr + (1-h)t and pr +(l-p)t are comparable. that Let r, t E R be not comparable. If possible let there exist A, p E (0, 1)such "x hr+(l-h)t hr+(l-h)t 5 pr+(l-p)t with h # p 5 pr+(l-p)t 3 (h-p)ri 5 (h-p)ti v i Nn 3 ri 5 ti tf i d n, (-:h# P) which is a contradiction to our assumption. Hence if two elements in Rnx are not comparable, then their convex linear combinations are also not comparable. 6.1.13 Note The following results hold true in R "x as they hold in any complete lattice. 1. Every complete automorphism on the lattice Rnx is a homeomorphism in the order topology.

2. Every principal ideal of the lattice Rnx is a convex sublattice and is closed in the order topology. 6.2 Further algebraic structures on the lattice R "X In this section, we shall discuss what kinds of algebraic structures, the lattice R form under some well known fuzzy set theoretic operations. "X 6.2.1 Definition The fuzzy set theoretic operations called algebraic product (-), algebraic sum (i), bounded product (O), bounded sum (@), drastic product (A) and drastic sum (v) can be defined on RnX as follows. For r, t E R "x' (1) algebraic product r.t is defined as (r.t) (x) = r(x) t(x) v x E "X (2) algebraic sum r i t is defined as (rit) (x) = r(x) + t(x) - r(x) t(x) v X' E "X (3) bounded product r 0 t is defined as (r~t)(x)= ov(r(x)+t(x)-1) vx E "X (4) bounded sum r CB t is defined as (r $ t) (x) = I A (r(x) + t(x)) t/ x E "X

(5) drastic product r A t is defined as (6) drastic sum r \;/ t is defined as 6.2.2 Proposition Let * E{., 4, 0, 63, A, V ) Then for any r, s, t E R, the following results hold. "x (i) r * t E R (closure property) "x (ii) r * t = t * r (commutativity) (iii) r * (t * s) = (r * t) * s (associativity) (iv) r * (t v s) = (r * t) v (r * s) r*(t A s)=(r* t) ~ (r*s) (distributivity) Commutativity, associativity and distributivity hold in R "x as they hold true in fuzzy sets with membership values in [0, I]. (See: [60,61] )

The closure property can easily be verified in all cases except for (4) Proof of closure property for (4) Let r, t E RnX. (r / t) (x) = r(x) + t(x) - r(x) t(x) = 1 - (I-r(x))(l-t(x)) E [0, 11 y x E "X and (r i t) (x,) = 1 Also, if i < j, (r -it) (xi) = 1 - (1-r(xi)) (1-t(xi)) :. (r i t) E Rnx 2 1 - (1 -r(x,)) (1 - t(x>) = (r / t) (x,) (-: r (xj 2 r (x,) and t(x> 2 t(x,) 6.2.3 Proposition R forms a lattice ordered semigroup with unity I, and zero OR under A, v and "X bounded product 0 where '0' is the semigroup operation. Dually RnX forms a lattice ordered semi group with unity 0, and zero I, under v, A and bounded sum $ where ' $' is the semigroup operation. RnX also forms a unitary (= 1, ) commutative semi ring with zero (= 0, ) under

v as addition and bounded product a as multiplication. Duality holds for A and bounded sum 8 with unity (= 0, ) and zero (= I, ). The universal bounds OR and I, of Rnx satisfy the identities r 8 I, = I, = I, 8 r Then the results follow from the Prop.(6.2.2) and Definitions (1.1.22) and 6.2.4 Proposition Rnx forms a lattice ordered semigroup with unity 1, and zero OR under A, v and algebraic product 6 3 where is the semigroup operation. Dually Rnx forms a lattice ordered semi group with unity 0, and zero I, under v A and algebraic sum i where is the semigroup operation.

Rnx also forms a unitary (= I, ) commutative semi ring with zero (= OR ) under v as addition and algebraic product. as multiplication. Duality holds for A and algebraic sum i with unity (= 0, ) and zero (= I, ). In addition to the identity laws w.r.t. A and v, the universal bounds 0, and I, of Rnx also satisfy the identities r. 0, = OR= 0, -r - r.1, - r = I; r r +OR= r = 0,ir r +IR = I, = IR+r Then the results follow from the Prop. (6.2.2) and Definitions (1.1.22) and (1.1.23). 6.2.5 Proposition Rnx forms a lattice ordered semigroup with unity I, and zero OR under A, v and drastic product A, where A is the semigroup operation. Dually Rnx forms a lattice ordered semi group with unity 0, and zero I, under v, A and drastic sum V. Rnx also forms a unitary (= 1, ) commutative semi ring with zero (= OR ) under v as addition and drastic product A as multiplication. The duality holds for A and drastic sum \;I with unity (= 0, ) and zero (= I, ).

In addition to the identity laws w.r.t. A and v, the universal bounds 0, and I, of Rnx also satisfy the identities ra OR = OR= OR Ar ra I,= r = IRA r rvor= r = ORvr r v IR = IR = IRv r Then the results follow from the Prop (6.2.2) and Definitions (1.l.22) and (1.1.23). The following proposition gives the identities satisfied by the non-specificity measure U, on Rnx (See: Def. (5.2.2)) w.r.t. the fuzzy set theoretic operations. 6.2.6 Proposition The non-specificity measure U, on Rnx satisfies the following identities. (i) U, (r. t) + U, (r + t) = U, (r) + U, (t) (ii) U, (r t) + U, (r $ t) = U, (r) + U, (t) for all r, t E Rnx.

The results follow immediately from the Definitions(6.2.1) and (5.2.2) 6.2.7 Remark The following result need NOT hold for all r, t E Rnx ux (r A t) + Ux (r \;I t) = ux (r) + Ux (t) Example: Let r = (1,.8,.3) t= (1,.6,.4) be elements in R3X rat =(l,o,o), r\;it =(I, 1, 1) Then it is obvious that 6.2.8 Remark The set Rnx does not satisfy idempotency, absorption and distributivity w.r.t. algebraic product (.) and algebraic sum (4). Hence Rnx does not constitute algebraic structures such as lattice or semiring w.r.t. these operations. The same is true of (a, $) and (A, V).