TOPOLOGICAL SPACES THAT ARE a-favorable FOR A PLAYER WITH PERFECT INFORMATION

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.gn] 6 Jul 2016

A REMARK ON IRREDUCIBLE SPACES

MAXIMAL INDEPENDENT COLLECTIONS OF CLOSED SETS

Fragmentability and σ-fragmentability

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

E.7 Alaoglu s Theorem

DIFFERENTIABILITY VIA DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVES

POINTS OF OPENNESS AND CLOSEDNESS OF SOME MAPPINGS

THE PRODUCT OF A LINDELÖF SPACE WITH THE SPACE OF IRRATIONALS UNDER MARTIN'S AXIOM

CLOSED MAPS AND THE CHARACTER OF SPACES

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then

Math 426 Homework 4 Due 3 November 2017

arxiv: v1 [math.gn] 27 Oct 2018

MUTUAL ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF SETS OF MEASURES

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9

Topology Part of the Qualify Exams of Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University Prepared by Zhang, Zecheng

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

PROPERTIES OF 5-CLOSED SPACES

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

PRODUCTS OF STEINER'S QUASI-PROXIMITY SPACES

A GENERALIZATION OF LUSIN'S THEOREM

A CROSS SECTION THEOREM AND AN APPLICATION TO C-ALGEBRAS

POINTWISE PRODUCTS OF UNIFORMLY CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

DENSELY k-separable COMPACTA ARE DENSELY SEPARABLE

Chapter 2 Metric Spaces

Calculation of the Ramanujan t-dirichlet. By Robert Spira

NON-EXISTENCE OF UNIVERSAL SPACES FOR SOME STRATIFIABLE SPACES

AN EXTENSION OF A THEOREM OF NAGANO ON TRANSITIVE LIE ALGEBRAS

FOR COMPACT CONVEX SETS

SPACES IN WHICH COMPACT SETS HAVE COUNTABLE LOCAL BASES

THE OPENNESS OF INDUCED MAPS ON HYPERSPACES

MAT 578 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS EXERCISES

cr-hereditarily CLOSURE-PRESERVING /t-networks AND g-metrizability

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

Week 5 Lectures 13-15

Strong completeness properties in topology

THE CANTOR GAME: WINNING STRATEGIES AND DETERMINACY. by arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 29 Jan 2017 MAGNUS D. LADUE

(GENERALIZED) COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY. 1. Introduction

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

MATH 614 Dynamical Systems and Chaos Lecture 6: Symbolic dynamics.

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

A Glimpse into Topology

A GENERALIZATION OF KELLEY S THEOREM FOR C-SPACES

VALUATION THEORY, GENERALIZED IFS ATTRACTORS AND FRACTALS

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

THE FIXED POINT PROPERTY FOR CONTINUA APPROXIMATED FROM WITHIN BY PEANO CONTINUA WITH THIS PROPERTY

Quasi-invariant measures for continuous group actions

LIFTING RECURSION PROPERTIES THROUGH GROUP HOMOMORPHISMS

A Countably-Based Domain Representation of a Non-Regular Hausdorff Space

COUNTABLE PARACOMPACTNESS AND WEAK NORMALITY PROPERTIES

YET MORE ON THE DIFFERENTIABILITY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS

ABSOLUTE F. SPACES A. H. STONE

A Ramsey theorem for polyadic spaces

Weakly Perfect Generalized Ordered Spaces

COMPOSITION OF LINEAR FRACTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN TERMS OF TAIL SEQUENCES

Topological properties

EXTENSIONS OF CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS FROM DENSE SUBSPACES

ON JOINTLY SOMEWHAT NEARLY CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction

Semi-stratifiable Spaces with Monotonically Normal Compactifications

^-,({«}))=ic^if<iic/n^ir=iic/, where e(n) is the sequence defined by e(n\m) = 8^, (the Kronecker delta).

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF sn-metrizable SPACES. Ying Ge

FINITE BOREL MEASURES ON SPACES OF CARDINALITY LESS THAN c

Oxtoby s pseudocompleteness revisited

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

. ffflffluary 7, 1855.

The topology of ultrafilters as subspaces of 2 ω

Maths 212: Homework Solutions

SET OF CONTINUITY POINTS OF FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN GENERALIZED METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction

LINDELÖF sn-networks

4 Countability axioms

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 39 No.6 (2013), pp

Measurable Choice Functions

TWO CHARACTERIZATIONS OF POWER COMPACT OPERATORS

On a Question of Maarten Maurice

Sanjay Mishra. Topology. Dr. Sanjay Mishra. A Profound Subtitle

Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski

ON ORDINALLY CLOSED SETS

THE NUMBER OF MULTIPLICATIONS ON //-SPACES OF TYPE (3, 7)

A NEW PROOF OF THE MCKINSEY-TARSKI THEOREM

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.gn] 21 Jun 2002

General Topology. Summer Term Michael Kunzinger

BOREL MEASURABILITY IN LINEAR ALGEBRA

4 Choice axioms and Baire category theorem

On productively Lindelöf spaces

g-metrizability and S, *

MONOTONICALLY COMPACT AND MONOTONICALLY

(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define

SELECTED ORDERED SPACE PROBLEMS

Houston Journal of Mathematics. c 1999 University of Houston Volume 25, No. 4, 1999

AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE TRIANGLE INEQUALITY FOR THE WASSERSTEIN METRIC

Exhibit 2-9/30/15 Invoice Filing Page 1841 of Page 3660 Docket No

A PROOF OF A CONVEX-VALUED SELECTION THEOREM WITH THE CODOMAIN OF A FRÉCHET SPACE. Myung-Hyun Cho and Jun-Hui Kim. 1. Introduction

SPACES WHOSE PSEUDOCOMPACT SUBSPACES ARE CLOSED SUBSETS. Alan Dow, Jack R. Porter, R.M. Stephenson, Jr., and R. Grant Woods

On surjectively universal Polish groups

A NOTE ON THE SINGULAR MANIFOLDS OF A DIFFERENCE POLYNOMIAL

KAHANE'S CONSTRUCTION AND THE WEAK SEQUENTIAL COMPLETENESS OF L1 E. A. HEARD

SIMULTANEOUS SOLUTIONS OF THE WEAK DIRICHLET PROBLEM Jan Kolar and Jaroslav Lukes Abstract. The main aim of this paper is a geometrical approach to si

FUCAI LIN AND SHOU LIN

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

1 Introduction. The Big Bush Machine. by Harold Bennett 1, Dennis Burke 2 and David Lutzer 3

Transcription:

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 50, July 1975 TOPOLOGICAL SPACES THAT ARE a-favorable FOR A PLAYER WITH PERFECT INFORMATION H. E. WHITE, JR. ABSTRACT. The class of spaces mentioned in the title is closely related to the class of a-favorable spaces introduced by G. Choquet \i\. For convenience, call the spaces mentioned in the title weakly a-favorable. The following statements are true: (1) every dense G g subset of a quasi-regular, weakly a-favorable space is weakly a-favorable; (2) the product of any family of weakly a-favorable spaces is weakly a-favorable; (3) any continuous, open image of a weakly a-favorable space is weakly a-favorable; (4) a quasi-regular space with a cr -disjoint pseudobase is weakly a-favorable if and only if it is pseudo-complete in the sense of J. C. Oxtoby; and (5) the product of a weakly a-favorable space and a Baire space is a Baire space. 1. Introduction. In recent years, a number of classes of topological spaces have been considered, each of which is a subclass of the class of Baire spaces, and each of which is closed under the formation of products (see [l] for a discussion of these classes). The purpose of this note is to show that the class of spaces mentioned in the title has a number of reasonable properties. The author would like to thank D. J. Lutzer for suggesting (in a letter) the desirability of finding a class of spaces satisfying statements which are essentially (2), (A), (5), (6), (7), (8), and (11) of the theorem, and for supplying the author with a copy of [l], which proved very helpful. 2. Definitions. For any function cp, let D(cf>), R(çf>) denote the domain and the range of cp, respectively. For any collection A of sets, let K = K <\. 101. A topological space (X, J ) is called weakly a-favorable (or a-favorable for a player with perfect information) if there is a sequence o - (cp ) of functions such that (2.1) D(</jj)= A*AR(cp1) and<p1((7)c U fot all U in >(<,), (2.2) for all tz in N, Received by the editors November 14, 1973 and, in revised form, April 10, 1974. AMS (MOS) subject classifications (1970). Primary 54E99, 54D99; Secondary 54E25, 54C10. Key words and phrases. Weakly a-favorable, a-favorable, pseudo-complete, ^-disjoint pseudo-base. Copyright 1975, American Mathematical Society 477

478 H. E. WHITE, JR. Dícp ) = \(U.,..., U +.)e(3"*)" + 1: ~ n + 1 I ' ' n + 1 «(^+l)cr.^d<pn+1(l/1,...,l/n D(cpn+l), and (2.3) if (U ) *, is a sequence such that n n c/v a Ui+ic^j('Uv'-'> ^for/=!,, «I, + 1)C(7n+1forall(í71,...,í7n+1)in (2.3.1) ((/,,, (7 ) e D((/j ) for all tí in /V, then fu^ : zz e NS^0. 72 There is an interesting discussion in [3, pp. 115 116] which can be used to give an interpretation, in the language of game theory, of the preceding definition. Any sequence o = (cp ) which satisfies (2.1), (2.2), and (2.3) is called a winning strategy for (X, J ). A sequence (U ) N which satisfies (2.3.1) is called an ö-sequence. A subfamily 9 of J is called a pseudo-base for J if every nonempty element of 9 contains a nonempty element of 9. A pseudo-base 9 is called (7-disjoint if 9 = Ul 9 ' n N\, where each 9 is a disjoint family. 3. Theorem. Suppose (X, 3) is a topological space. (1) If X is weakly a-favorable, then X is a Baire space. (2) If X is locally weakly a-favorable, then X is weakly a-favorable. (3) // X is either pseudo-complete [4] or a-favorable [3], then X is weakly a-favorable. (A) If, for each i in I, X. is weakly a-favorable and m > N, then the m- box product of (X.).. is weakly a-favorable. favorable. (5) // X is weakly a-favorable and U is open in X, then U is weakly a- (6) // X is quasi-regular [A] and weakly a-favorable, and X. is a dense Gg subset of X, then X is weakly a-favorable. (7) If 6 is a continuous, closed, irreducible mapping of (X, A) onto (Y, II), then X is weakly a-favorable if and only if Y is weakly a-favorable. (8) // 6 is a continuous, open mapping of (X, J ) 072Z0 (Y, ll), fltzzi X is weakly a-favorable, then Y is weakly a-favorable. is a Baire (9) // X is a Baire space and (Y, ll) is weakly a-favorable, then X x Y space. (10) // X has a o-disjoint pseudo-base 9, then X is weakly a-favorable if and only if it is a-favorable. If X is also quasi-regular, then X is weakly a-favorable if and only if X is pseudo-complete.

a-favorable TOPOLOGICAL SPACES 479 (11) // X is a T space with a base of countable order [5], then X is weakly a-favorable if and only if there is a dense G g subset which is metrically topologically complete. Remarks, (i) It follows from (10) that the concepts of weakly a-favorable, a-favorable, and pseudo-complete coincide for the class of quasiregular spaces which have dense metrizable subspaces. In particular, they coincide for quasi-regular, semi-metrizable spaces (since every semi-metrizable Baire space has a dense metrizable subspace). (ii) It follows from (A) and (8) that X x Y is weakly a-favorable if and only if both X and Y are weakly a-favorable. (iii) Statement (9) generalizes 4.2 of [2]. The proof given here is shorter and simpler than the proof of 4.2 that is given in [2]. (iv) Statement (11) is very similar to the corollary to Theorem 2.4 of [2]. (v) A generalization of Theorem 2.4 of [2] can be obtained by combining (3), (8), and (10). Proof. The proofs of (1), (2), (3), and (5) are easy and are omitted. The proof of (A) is quite similar to the proof of theorem 7.12(iv) of [3]» and is omitted. (6) Suppose o = (cp ) en isa winning strategy for (X, J ). Since J is quasi-regular, the family Ä of all regular elements of J is a pseudo-base for J ; hence we may assume that \j\r(<f> )' n N\ C J{. Suppose X. = (]\G : n N\, where each G is open in X. Denote the r r u n n * relative topology on X by 3", and define y: AQ * J so that XQ n y(u) = (7 for all U in 3". Define, by induction, a sequence S = (if/ ) which 0 U n n ZV satisfies (2.1) and (2.2) relative to (X, 3 n), and such that it n N and (Í7.,, U ) e D(if/ ), then (G, D y((7 ),, G D y(u )) D(<p ) and xl ' n n I ' 1 ' n ' n ' n (3.1) if) ([/,,, U ) = Xn cp ÍG.n y([/. ), -, G n y(v )). nl ' n Ü rnl ' 1 ' ' n ' n In detail: Suppose 72 > 1, and that, for / = 1,, 72-1,<A- has been defined. Suppose (Uy,---, Un) e (3"*)" and C/.+ 1 C />.(t71, - - -, (7.) for / = 1,,?2-1. Then XnyiU )Cifj Au.,---, u A 0 ' 72 ' 72 1 1 ' 72 1 CcS,(G, n y(//,),---, G. n yiu A). 'n l 1 1 zz 1 rz 1 Since R(c/j _.)C Ji and X is dense in X, y(u ) is contained in ^-l(gin WO* * G -In yiun-l})- Theref re ^ iuv---, UJ can be defined by (3.1).

480 H. E. WHITE, JR. Now, if (U ) m is an d -sequence, then (G C\ y(u ))., is an o- ' v n ners U n ' n n N sequence. Hence Ç\\U : n N\ =C\\G n n y(u ): n N\ 4 0, n n and Sisa u winning strategy for (X, J Q). r. (7) Define 6*: 3"* U* by letting 0*((7) = Y -v 6[X ^ U] for each U in If (X, J ) is weakly a-favorable and ö = (c/j ),, is a winning strategy for (X, J ), then we define, by induction, a sequence b = (if/ ) which satisfies (2.1) and (2.2) relative to (Y, ll) and such that, if n N and (V,,---,V )ed(ifj ), then (0~ l\v, 1,, ^-I!V ]) e D(cp ) and I '72 72 1 ' 72 72 ÍV.,---, V )=6*Í4> Í6-l[V.],-.-, 6-1[V ])). 'ni1 ' n r n i ' ' n If (V )., is an «-sequence, then (6~ [V ])., is an d-sequence, so C\\Vn: zz e N\ = ftcttd-^vj: n N\] 4 0. If (Y, ll) is weakly a-favorable and 0 = (ifj) en is a winning strategy for (Y, ll), then we define, by induction, a sequence d = (cp ) en which satisfies (2.1) and (2.2) and such that, it n N and (U.,- -, U ) D(<f, ), then «fd^), -, 6*(Un)) D(if/n) and <p ((/,,, U )=6-l[ifj Í6*ÍU,),---, 6*ÍU ))]. ~ n 1' 'rz rn 1 n If ('/ ),., is an «-sequence, then (6 (U )),., is an t>.-sequence, so n n N ^ ' x n n N 0 ^ Die/ :zz N DfliÖ-1^^ )]:» enur'fni^u ):«e/v},é0. 72 72 72 (8) Suppose b = ((fy ) is a winning strategy for (X, J ). Define, by induction, sequences vn = (ib )... (y ) ^., of functions such that (a) o satisfies (2.1) and (2.2) relative to (Y, ll), (b) D(yx) = D(ifj J and, if V D(yx), then y1(v)= Ö_1[V] and-7>1(v)= 6[<p y(y y(v))], and (c) for all 72 in N, (n.l) D(yn+l)= D(if/n+1) and R(yn + l)c D(cpn+1), and (n.2) if (V1,.--,Vn + 1) D(yn + 1)andyn(Vv...,Vn)=(Ul,...,Un),then and Yn±i{vv->vn+l) = iuv---,un,6-'[vn+l]ncpn(uv.-.,un)) Now, if (V ) N is an ö -sequence, then there is an d-sequence (Í7 ) CK1 such that 6[U ]=V for all 77 in N. Hence C\\V : n N\ A nn^n n n n 6{fl\Un:n e N\]/0. (9) Suppose o = (zi ) is a winning strategy for (Y, ll) and that

a-favorable TOPOLOGICAL SPACES 481 (G )., is a sequence v n n N L of dense, open subsets of X x Y. It suffices to show that C\\G : zz e N\ 4 0. n We define, by induction, a sequence (y ).. of functions such that, for each 72 in N, (n.l) D(y ) is a disjoint subfamily of J, R(y ) C ll, and H x y (f/) C G for ail // in D(y ), (n.2) D(y, ) refines />(y ), (n.3) if ' n 72 72 72+1 72 tfy e 0(y;) for j = 1,, zz, and fíy + 1 C H. for j = 1, - -, n - 1, then (y.ctf,), ""' yn-hrp ë D(-^J' and ^n-4)ud(y ) is dense in X. In detail: At the 72th step, let A denote the set of all functions y such that (n.l) and (n.3) (and, if 7Z > 1, ((n - 1).2)), with y replaced by y, hold. Order J by inclusion. Since Zorn's lemma is applicable, there is a maximal element y in J. If y does not satisfy (n.4) and 72 > 1, then, for 7 = 1,, 72-1, there is H. in D(y.) such that H.+ lc H. fot j = 1,---, n- 2, and Hn n [X ^ cl[u/)(yn)]] 40. So there are H in 3"*, K in U such that H x K is contained in G«{[^-in[X'X'Cl[UD(y")]]]X0"-l(yiWl),'"'y"-l(f/"-l))}' Then y u (//, K) e A. Therefore y satisfies (n.4). ' n ' n ' n Since X is a Baire space, (\\{jd(cp ): n N\ 4 0. Suppose x (\\KJD(<p ): 72 N\. Then there is a sequence (// ) N such that for each 77 in N, h\ D(yn) and H^ C /^ By ((n.3))^, "(,(»>,.«* is an S- sequence; hence Diy (# ): n N\ 4 0. And, if y e D!y (W ): n N\, then («i y)efllf/ xy?!(//n): 72 e N C f lg : n N\. (10) Suppose d = (cp ) en is a winning strategy for (X, J) and 9 = Ui^ : n N\ where, for each n in N, 9 is a disjoint family and U > is ^^ n 7 ' n ' J n dense in X. We define, by induction, a sequence (y ) en of functions.such that, for each?2 in zv, (n.l) D(y ) is a disjoint subfamily of J that refines 9 and R(yn) C 3"*, (n.2) D(y" + j) refines DQ^), (n.3) if H. D(Yj) for 7 = 1,, 72, and H.+ l C H. for 7= 1,, 77-1, then (y/r/j), -, y^f/^)) e D(r/jn) and <Pn(yl(Hl ),, Y Wn)) = #. and (n.4)ud(y ) is dense in X. In detail: At the 77th step, let y be a maximal element of J, where we r' 'n n' define A verbatim as in (9). If y does not satisfy (n.4) and 72 > 1, then there is P in 9 and, for / = 1,, n - 1, there is H. in D(y ) such that n n ' ' ' ' ' 7 ' j H., C H. foi j = 1,,72-2 and 7+1 7 ' ' K=P«"Hn_ln[x^cl[\jDiyn)JJ40.

482 H. E. WHITE, JR. Then y»uí^1o.i)»-'vi(vi)'jo',f)iey<,- Therefore y satisfies (n.4). Let X0"=n<UD(yn):72e N\ and 9>Q =! H O X0: // e U!D(y ):» 6 /Vi. Then J$0 is a base for a topology J. on X Define the pseudo-metric d on X. by letting dix, y) = inf Ît2~ ': there is H in Diy ) such that x, y H i for all x, y in X Then J is the pseudo-metric topology induced by d. In fact, if H e D(y ) and x H O X n, then \y X.: d(x, y)< n~l\ = ' zz zz zz (r ^ U ' ^ f/ O X And (X d) is complete. For suppose (x ) is a Cauchy sequence in (X, d). We may assume that, for all 72 in N, d(x, x.,)< «~. Then there is a sequence (H ),., such that, for all 72 in N, x H D(y ) ' zz n N n n ' n and Hn + l C tf^. By ((n.3))nen, (yn(hn))n N is an S-sequence; hence fliy (W ): zz /V z 0. But, since y. (//, ) C // for each 72, Hi W : ' zz zz zz+izz+1 zz zz n N\ 4 0 And, if * eol H : n N\, then (x ),.. converges to x. Hence zz n n en " (X,.) ) is both a-favorable and pseudo-complete. Since J _ is a pseudobase for the relative topology J(^0) on^0' ^0' ^0^ *s ^>otn a"favorable and pseudo-complete. Since X. is dense in X, (X, J ) is a-favorable and, if J is quasi-regular, (X, J ) is pseudo-complete. (11) The proof of (11) is very similar to the proof of (10). In fact, if (X, 3) s a T space without any isolated points, and Jo is a base of countable order for J, then we can choose the sequence (9 )... so that \j\ J : ' ^ * n ncn ^ n?2 N\ C 9> and 9 C\ 9 = 0 for all 72 in N. Then it is easily verified n n + i ' that J 0 = 3 (X ); hence X is the required metrically topologically complete dense Gg. REFERENCES 1. J. M. Aarts and D. J. Lutzer, Completeness properties designed for recognizing Baire spaces (to appear). 2. -, Pseudo-completeness and the product of Baire spaces, Pacific J. Math. 48 (1973), 1-10. 3. G. Choquet, Lectures on analysis. I: Integration and topological vector spaces, Benjamin, New York, 1969. MR 40 #3252. 4. J. C. Oxtoby, Cartesian products of Baire spaces, Fund. Math. 49 (1960/61), 157-166. MR 25 #4055; erratum, 26, 1453. 5. H. H. Wicke and J. M. Worrell, Jr., Open continuous mappings of spaces having bases of countable order, Duke Math. J. 34 (1967), 255-272. MR 35 #979. 25I NORTH BLACKBURN ROAD, RT. 5, ATHENS, OHIO 45701