The Homogenous Lorentz Group

Similar documents
Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics

A Brief Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

The Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory

Introduction to Group Theory

10 Lorentz Group and Special Relativity

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Chapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE. 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra

Instructor: Sudipta Mukherji, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

232A Lecture Notes Representation Theory of Lorentz Group

Quantum Field Theory

Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation

Attempts at relativistic QM

Lorentz and Poincaré groups

Physics 557 Lecture 5

The special theory of relativity

Gravitation: Special Relativity

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics

Special Relativity. Chapter The geometry of space-time

2 Lie Groups. Contents

The Lorentz and Poincaré groups. By Joel Oredsson

Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1

The Lorentz group provides another interesting example. Moreover, the Lorentz group SO(3, 1) shows up in an interesting way in computer vision.

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

Symmetries for fun and profit

2. Lie groups as manifolds. SU(2) and the three-sphere. * version 1.4 *

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Overthrows a basic assumption of classical physics - that lengths and time intervals are absolute quantities, i.e., the same for all observes.

Lorentz Transformations and Special Relativity

Disclaimer. [disclaimer]

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

Lorentz Group and Lorentz Invariance

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Chapter 17 The bilinear covariant fields of the Dirac electron. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

Representations of Lorentz Group

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

Quantum Field Theory III

Wigner s Little Groups

Review and Notation (Special relativity)

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Lecture 13 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell

1 Tensors and relativity

General Relativity (225A) Fall 2013 Assignment 2 Solutions

Faraday Tensor & Maxwell Spinor (Part I)

Introduction to Covariant Formulation

Spacetime and 4 vectors

Class Meeting # 12: Kirchhoff s Formula and Minkowskian Geometry

1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

REVIEW. Quantum electrodynamics (QED) Quantum electrodynamics is a theory of photons interacting with the electrons and positrons of a Dirac field:

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Physics 513, Quantum Field Theory Homework 4 Due Tuesday, 30th September 2003

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3)

L = e i `J` i `K` D (1/2,0) (, )=e z /2 (10.253)

A method for construction of Lie group invariants

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Rotation Eigenvectors and Spin 1/2

Symmetry Groups conservation law quantum numbers Gauge symmetries local bosons mediate the interaction Group Abelian Product of Groups simple

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

Particle Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

THE DIRAC AND WEYL SPINOR REPRESENTATIONS

x 3 x 1 ix 2 x 1 + ix 2 x 3

Appendix C Lorentz group and the Dirac algebra

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 18 Oct 2018

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Electromagnetic. G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Jefferson Lab Professor of Physics Old Dominion University Physics 804 Electromagnetic Theory II

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents

An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

REPRESENTATION OF THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS IN 6-DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Extending the 4 4 Darbyshire Operator Using n-dimensional Dirac Matrices

Problem Set #1: 1.1, 1.3, 1.7, 1.10, 1.13 (Due Monday Sept. 23rd)

MATH 742 ADVANCED TOPICS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS REPRESENTATION THEORY OF THE POINCARÉ GROUP FINAL PROJECT

Minkowski spacetime. Pham A. Quang. Abstract: In this talk we review the Minkowski spacetime which is the spacetime of Special Relativity.

Linearized Gravity Return to Linearized Field Equations

Non-Abelian Gauge Invariance Notes Physics 523, Quantum Field Theory II Presented Monday, 5 th April 2004

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

The l.h.s. of this equation is again a commutator of covariant derivatives, so we find. Deriving this once more we find

1.7 Plane-wave Solutions of the Dirac Equation

e ik(x y) m 2 where the last equality follows from eq. (3.10a) for the sum over polarizations. = i

Vectors. Three dimensions. (a) Cartesian coordinates ds is the distance from x to x + dx. ds 2 = dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2 = g ij dx i dx j (1)

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises

Transcription:

The Homogenous Lorentz Group Thomas Wening February 3, 216 Contents 1 Proper Lorentz Transforms 1 2 Four Vectors 2 3 Basic Properties of the Transformations 3 4 Connection to SL(2, C) 5 5 Generators of L + 7 6 Summary 9 1 Proper Lorentz Transforms Before we get started let us revise the Lorentz transformation between two equally oriented inertial systems moving with velocity v along the x 1 -axis. Here x = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ), x = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ) are the space-time coordinates of our inertial systems. With x := ct can write such transformation in coordinates: x = γx βγx 1, (1) x 1 = βγx + γx 1, (2) x 2 = x 2, x 3 = x 3, where β := v/c and γ := 1/ 1 β 2. Easily, we see that this translates perfectly into matrix operations: x γ βγ x x 1 x 2 = βγ γ x 1 1 x 2. (3) x 3 1 x 3 1

We go a step further and define the angle Ψ := cosh 1 γ. (4) Then we have γ = cosh Ψ and β = tanh Ψ, which turns our transformation matrix into cosh Ψ sinh Ψ sinh Ψ cosh Ψ 1. (5) 1 This reminds us very much of a rotation in R 3 through an angle θ about the x 3 -axis: cos θ sin θ sin θ cos θ. (6) 1 There are a few differences however. First of all, there is a difference in signs. Moreover, the rotation matrix contains sin, cos, while the matrix of our Lorentz transformation contains sinh and cosh. Yet, the different signs cause their determinants to be the same. For the rotation matrix it is 1; for our Lorentz transformation matrix it is also (coshψ) 2 (sinhψ) 2 = 1. 2 Four Vectors In special relativity we work in the 4-dimensional Minkwoski space denoted as M, which is an R-vector space with a pseudo scalar product, M. The latter is different from the Euclidean scalar product. For convenience we will simply write, instead of, M. Its elements are called four vectors x µ = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ). In physics we choose x = ct with the speed of light c and the spatial coordinates x = (x 1, x 2, x 3 ). While we might be tempted to identify Minkowski space with the 4-dimensional R 4, its structure is inherently different from that of Euklidean space. Convention: In this presentation we are using the Einstein sum convention. Over the same indices appearing multiple times, each as a sub- and a superscript, a summation is carried out, e.g. a i j,k b j := i ai j,k b i. We can define a pseudo scalar product in M: x, y = x y (x 1 y 1 + x 2 y 2 + x 3 y 3 ). (7) Moreover, we distinct between covariant and controvariant vectors. If x µ = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ) is a covariant vector, then x µ = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ) is its corresponding controvariant vector. The only difference is the different sign in the spatial coordinates. The time coordinate however is left 2

unchanged. Now we can introduce the pseudo metric tensor g µν, g µν (from now on simply metric tensor ). We define its covariant form as 1, µ = ν = g µν = g µν := 1, 1 µ = ν 3 (8), µ ν If not otherwise noted µ, ν run from to 3. Furthermore, the metric tensor has following important properties: g µν x µ = x ν, g µν x µ = x ν. So basically, the metric tensor switches indices and turns a covariant into a controvariant, or a controvariant into a covariant vector. We will be using these properties later on. In fact, we can identify vectors and even scalars with tensors. We call a tensor with n distinct indices a tensor of n-th order. Thus, a scalar is a th -order tensor, a vector a 1 st -order tensor. The highest order we will deal with in this presentation are 2 nd -order tensors. There are 3 types of them, classified by the position of their indices: covariant tensors Λ µν, controvariant tensors Λ µν, and mixed tensors Λ µ ν, Λ µ ν. With the aid of this definition we can redefine the scalar product in a more useful manner: x, y := x µ g µν y ν = x µ y µ. (9) If we identify the diagonal matrix g := diag(1, 1, 1, 1) with the metric tensor, the corresponding vector notation becomes x, y = x T gy. Now it becomes clear why this is not a real scalar product: The matrix g corresponding to this bilinear form is indefinite. 3 Basic Properties of the Transformations The general homogenous Lorentz transformations are mappings of M onto itself. They are linear mappings preserving the Minkowski norm x := x, x of four vectors. Like all linear mappings they can be represented by a quadratic matrix Λ. Thus, the transformation in coordinate form is defined by x µ = Λ µ νx ν. (1) 3

The homogenous Lorentz transformations conserve the pseudo norm induced by the scalar product. Let x := Λx, then x 2 = x T gx = (Λx) T g(λx) (11) Hence, we can conclude that Λ T gλ = g, which gives us = x T Λ T gλx (12)! = x T gx (13) = x 2. (14) Λ T gλ = g det(λ T Λ) = (det Λ) 2 = 1. (15) So we find det Λ = ±1. This means that Λ Gl 4 (R) is an invertible 4x4- matrix. Now, let L := {Λ Gl 4 (R Λ T gλ = g} be the set of all homogenous Lorentz transformations. Then L is a group. Proof Let Λ 1, Λ 2 be in L. We define Λ 3 := Λ 1 Λ 2. Then Λ 3 is another homogenous Lorentz transformation since Λ T 3 gλ 3 = Λ T 2 Λ T 1 gλ 1 Λ 2 = Λ T 2 gλ 2 = g. (16) Moreover, the product of any Λ i L is associative since matrix multiplication is associative. The identity element is the unit matrix E 4. Since det Λ there is an inverse element Λ 1 L for each Λ L. Let us go back to the scalar product in M. First we contemplate the component with σ = ρ = in Λ µ σg µν Λ ν ρ = g ρσ. We find, that g µν Λ µ Λν = g ( Λ ) 2 + 3 µ,ν=1 g µν Λ µ Λν (17) ( ) = g Λ 2 3 (Λ ν ) 2. (18) This yields 1 ( Λ 2 ) Λ 1 Λ 1. Combined with the fact that det Λ = ±1, this implies that L is not a connected group. It is made up of four disjoint sets which we call components. Moreover, there are three discrete transformations in L: the identity Id, ν=1 4

space inversion I S, time inversion I T, and space-time inversion I ST = I S I T = I T I S = Id. symbol Λ det Λ discrete transformation L + +1 +1 Id L +1-1 I S L + 1 +1 I T L 1-1 Id Table 1: The different components of L and their properties The space-time inversion I ST is really just a composition of the first two inversions. The set {Id, I S, I T I ST } L is an Abelian subgroup of the Lorentz group. Table 1 gives us an oversight over the four components of L. Of all the components only the proper orthochronous Lorentz group L + is a subgroup of L. The other components can be identified with left cosets of the corresponding discrete transformation and L +. Moreover, the union of L + with any of the other components forms a subgroup of L. From now on, we will restrict our discussion to the proper orthochronous Lorentz group L +. Because its parameter space is not bound. 4 Connection to SL(2, C) We want to show the relation of L + to SL(2, C). In doing so, we use the Pauli matrices: ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 i 1 σ 1 :=, σ 1 2 :=, σ i 3 :=. 1 With the 2x2-identity matrix E 2 =: σ we define a controvariant 4-tupel σ µ := (σ, σ 1, σ 2, σ 3, ) = (σ, σ). It is important to keep in mind that this is now not a 4-tupel of numbers, but a 4-tupel of matrices. We define another such controvariant 4-tupel σ µ := σ µ = (σ, σ). (19) With these definitions, we associate to each x µ a hermitian 2x2-matrix ( X = σ µ x µ x = + x 3 x 1 ix 2 ) x 1 + ix 3 x x 3. (2) 5

This means that X Mat 2 (C) is self-adjoined, i.e. X = X T. First we show that T r(σ µ σ ν ) = 2g µν. (21) Proof We need following property of the Pauli matrices: σ µ σ ν = δ µν σ + i ɛ µνρ σ ρ. (22) With the definitions of the controvariant 4-tupels and the properties of the Pauli matrices we now find, that µ = ν = T r(σ σ ) = 2, (23) µ =, 1 ν 3 T r(σ σ ν ) = T r(σ ν ) =, (24) 1 µ 3, ν = T r(σ σ ν ) = T r(σ µ ) =, (25) 1 µ = ν 3 T r(σ σ ν ) = T r(δ µµ σ ) = 2, (26) 1 µ, ν 3, µ ν T r(σ σ ν ) = i ɛ µνρ T r(σ ρ ) =. (27) Hence, this yields T r(σ µ σ ν ) = 2g µν. Using this, we find the equation T r(σ µ X) = T r(σ µ σ ν x ν ) = T r(g µρ σ ρ σ ν x ν ) = g µρ x ν T r(σ ρ σ ν = g µρ 2 g ρν x ν = 2g µρ x ρ = 2x µ. Moreover, the determinant of X is det X = x + x 3 x 1 ix 2 x 1 + ix 3 x x 3 = (x ) 2 (x 3 ) 2 ( (x 1 ix 2 )(x 1 + ix2) ) = (x ) 2 x 2 = x 2. (28) Given a unimodular complex matrix T {A Gl 2 (C) det A = 1} we transform the matrix X: X = T XT. (29) Clearly, since the determinants of T, T equal 1, the Minkowski norm is conserved under such transformation. Hence, X corresponds to a Lorentz transformation Λ. 6

5 Generators of L + Since pure rotations do not affect the x -coordinate, one can extend the generators of SO(3) by a null row and column for it: i i X 1 = i i, X 2 = i, X 3 = i (3). At last, we have to find the corresponding generator for the Lorentz boost cosh Ψ sinh Ψ B 1 = sinh Ψ cosh Ψ 1 (31) 1 It is obtained by taking the derivative of B 1 at Ψ = : i db i 1(Ψ) dψ = i Ψ= =: Y 1. (32) The Y 2, Y 3 for Lorentz boosts along the x 2 -,x 3 -axes are found in an analogous fashion. The commutators of these generators are [X i, X j ] = iɛ ijk X k, [X i, Y j ] = iɛ ijk Y k, [Y i, Y j ] = iɛ ijk Y k. The first equation shows clearly that the spatial rotations{x 1, X 2, X 3 } form the subalgebra SO(3). The second equation shows us that the tripel (Y 1, Y 2, Y 3 ) transforms just like a vector under spatial rotations. The last equation shows that the Lorentz boosts {Y 1, Y 2, Y 3 } do not form a subalgebra, i.e. they do not close in on themselves. The commutation relations are further simplified by defining the linear combinations X ± := 1 ( ) X ± iy, (33) 2 where X := (X 1, X 2, X 3 ), and Y := (Y 1, Y 2, Y 3 ). Using this, we acquire the commutations [X + i, X+ j ] = iɛ jikx + k, 7

[X i, X j ] = iɛ jikx k, [X + i, X j ] =. We see that the first two equations close in on themselves. They form two independent SU(2) algebras. Further, we note that there is a big similarity to the SO(4) in this respect. Howoever, these equations here are complex equations. The commutation relations for SO(4) on the other hand are real equations. Both are locally isomorphic to one another. The irreducible representations j 1, j 2 of the first and second SO(2) respectively can now be enumerated. Each has 2j 1,2 + 1 degrees of freedom. L + is not compact. Hence, its irreducible representations cannot be unitary. We want to discuss some examples. The trivial representation is (,). The Weyl representations (, 1 2 ), ( 1 2, ) are the lowest dimensional irreducible representations with two degrees of freedom. The Dirac representation ( 1 2, ) (, 1 2 ) is used in quantum electrodynamics to describe the electron. It acts on 4-component spinors. The representation ( 1 2, 1 2 ) corresponds to the defining representation of L +. Of course, it has four degrees of freedom. The representation (1, ) (, 1) with 6 degrees of freedom is carried by antisymmetric tensors F µν. In electrodynamics the six independent components can be identified with the electrical and magnetic field components. 6 Summary Let us resume the core aspects of this presentation. The Minkowski space M is a 4-dimensional R-vector space with the pseudo scalar product x, y := x µ g µν y ν. The Lorentz transformations are all endomorphisms of M onto itself that leave the Minkowski norm x := x, x invariant, their absolute determinant is 1. The Lorentz group L is the set of all such transformations. It is not connected and consists of 4 disjoint sets called components. The proper orthochronous Lorentz group L + is the only component that is also a subgroup of L. Its elements Λ have the properties det Λ = +1, Λ +1 and its discrete transformation is Id = gµν. 8

In SL(2, C) we can define a hermitian 2x2-matrix X := σ µ x µ, which is invariant under transformation X = T XT with a unimodular matrix T. It corresponds to a Lorentz transformation Λ L +. The generators of L + are the generators X 1,2,3 of spatial rotations with an additional null row and column for the x -coordinate. The generators of the Lorentz boosts Y j along the x j -axis (j=1,2,3) are obtained by taking the derivative Y j := i db j (Ψ)/dΨ Ψ= at Ψ =. The Lie algebra of L + is [X + i, X+ j ] = iɛ ijkx + k, [X i, X j ] = iɛ ijkx k, [X+ i, X j ] =, where X ± := 1 2 Literatur ( X ± i Y ). H.F. Jones: Groups, representations and Physics. Adam Hilger Ldt., 199, S.198-28 G. Costa, G. Fogli: Symmetries and Group Theory in Particle Physics - An Introduction to Space-time and Internal Symmetries. Springer- Verlag, 212, S.43-51 9