MODELS OF RADAR CLUTTER FROM THE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

Similar documents
A GLRT FOR RADAR DETECTION IN THE PRESENCE OF COMPOUND-GAUSSIAN CLUTTER AND ADDITIVE WHITE GAUSSIAN NOISE. James H. Michels. Bin Liu, Biao Chen

CFAR DETECTION OF SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED TARGETS IN K- DISTRIBUTED CLUTTER WITH UNKNOWN PARAMETERS

Kalman filtering for drift correction in IR detectors

A New Nonlinear Filtering Method for Ballistic Target Tracking

Envelope PDF in Multipath Fading Channels with Random Number of Paths and Nonuniform Phase Distributions

EXTENDED GLRT DETECTORS OF CORRELATION AND SPHERICITY: THE UNDERSAMPLED REGIME. Xavier Mestre 1, Pascal Vallet 2

ADAPTIVE ARRAY DETECTION ALGORITHMS WITH STEERING VECTOR MISMATCH

A SIRV-CFAR Adaptive Detector Exploiting Persymmetric Clutter Covariance Structure

2-D SENSOR POSITION PERTURBATION ANALYSIS: EQUIVALENCE TO AWGN ON ARRAY OUTPUTS. Volkan Cevher, James H. McClellan

Asymptotic Analysis of the Generalized Coherence Estimate

Performance Bounds for Polynomial Phase Parameter Estimation with Nonuniform and Random Sampling Schemes

An Investigation of the Generalised Range-Based Detector in Pareto Distributed Clutter

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Noncoherent Integration Gain, and its Approximation Mark A. Richards. June 9, Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Integration in Radar Signal Processing

Different approaches to model wind speed based on stochastic differential equations

Discrete Simulation of Power Law Noise

Adaptive Binary Integration CFAR Processing for Secondary Surveillance Radar *

A PARAMETRIC MOVING TARGET DETECTOR FOR DISTRIBUTED MIMO RADAR IN NON-HOMOGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT

MULTIPLE-CHANNEL DETECTION IN ACTIVE SENSING. Kaitlyn Beaudet and Douglas Cochran

SIMULATION OF DOUBLY-SELECTIVE COMPOUND K FADING CHANNELS FOR MOBILE-TO-MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Yuan Liu, Jian Zhang, and Yahong Rosa Zheng

2.7 The Gaussian Probability Density Function Forms of the Gaussian pdf for Real Variates

Radar detection with the Neyman Pearson criterion using supervised-learning-machines trained with the cross-entropy error

A SUBSPACE-BASED APPROACH TO SEA CLUTTER SUPPRESSION FOR IMPROVED TARGET DETECTION

CFAR TARGET DETECTION IN TREE SCATTERING INTERFERENCE

Statistics of Correlated Generalized Gamma Variates

Overview of Beamforming

A New Method of Generating Multivariate Weibull Distributed Data

Estimating Correlation Coefficient Between Two Complex Signals Without Phase Observation

BORD: bayesian optimum radar detector

Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 44, , 2012

The Effect of Memory Order on the Capacity of Finite-State Markov and Flat-Fading Channels

Robust Space-Time Adaptive Processing Using Projection Statistics

Products and Ratios of Two Gaussian Class Correlated Weibull Random Variables

Applied Probability and Stochastic Processes

Comparison of DPSK and MSK bit error rates for K and Rayleigh-lognormal fading distributions

Weibull-Gamma composite distribution: An alternative multipath/shadowing fading model

Performance Analysis of an Adaptive Algorithm for DOA Estimation

MODEL ORDER ESTIMATION FOR ADAPTIVE RADAR CLUTTER CANCELLATION. Kelly Hall, 4 East Alumni Ave. Kingston, RI 02881

FAST AND ACCURATE DIRECTION-OF-ARRIVAL ESTIMATION FOR A SINGLE SOURCE

Robust extraction of specific signals with temporal structure

STRUCTURE-AWARE DICTIONARY LEARNING WITH HARMONIC ATOMS

Optimum Time-Frequency Distribution for Detecting a Discrete-Time Chirp Signal in White Gaussian Noise. Abstract

adar Detection in Non-Gaussian Environment : Optimum Detectors Evaluation of their Performance

L29: Fourier analysis

Determining the Optimal Decision Delay Parameter for a Linear Equalizer

Target Detection Studies Using Fully Polarimetric Data Collected by the Lincoln Laboratory MMW SAR. L.M. Novak MIT Lincoln Laboratory

This is the published version of a paper presented at IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2013.

An Adaptive Detector with Range Estimation Capabilities for Partially Homogeneous Environment

Gaussian Filters for Nonlinear Filtering Problems

Hyung So0 Kim and Alfred 0. Hero

Chapter 5 continued. Chapter 5 sections

Modifying Voice Activity Detection in Low SNR by correction factors

Microwave Phase Shift Using Ferrite Filled Waveguide Below Cutoff

Detection-Threshold Approximation for Non-Gaussian Backgrounds

On the Robustness of Algebraic STBCs to Coefficient Quantization

Antonio De Maio, Maria S. Greco, and Danilo Orlando. 1.1 Historical Background and Terminology Symbols Detection Theory 6

Performance Analysis of Multiple Antenna Systems with VQ-Based Feedback

Publication VI. Esa Ollila On the circularity of a complex random variable. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, volume 15, pages

TARGET DETECTION WITH FUNCTION OF COVARIANCE MATRICES UNDER CLUTTER ENVIRONMENT

Optimal Speech Enhancement Under Signal Presence Uncertainty Using Log-Spectral Amplitude Estimator

Neural Network Identification of Non Linear Systems Using State Space Techniques.

Coherent Multilook Radar Detection for Targets in Pareto Distributed Clutter

Phase Factor Influence on Amplitude Distortion and Aliasing of Pseudo-QMF Banks

On the Average Crossing Rates in Selection Diversity

Ground Moving Target Parameter Estimation for Stripmap SAR Using the Unscented Kalman Filter

Exponentiated Weibull distribution family under aperture averaging for Gaussian beam waves

Comparison of Travel-time statistics of Backscattered Pulses from Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Rough Surfaces

Learning Gaussian Process Models from Uncertain Data

Fuzzy Logic Based Nonlinear Kalman Filter Applied to Mobile Robots Modelling

State Estimation of Linear and Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

Approximate Ergodic Capacity of a Class of Fading Networks

DETECTION PERFORMANCE FOR THE GMF APPLIED TO STAP DATA

Intelligent CFAR Detector Based on Support Vector Machine

RAO-BLACKWELLISED PARTICLE FILTERS: EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS

On capacity of multi-antenna wireless channels: Effects of antenna separation and spatial correlation

MONTE-CARLO BASED ESTIMATION METHODS FOR RAPIDLY-VARYING SEA CLUTTER

Analysis of methods for speech signals quantization

AD- A javal Research Laboratory. convergence performance of Akdaptive Detectors, part 4. Radar D ivislofl E E19930 NRVJIFB53419*2,9M

KNOWLEDGE-BASED RECURSIVE LEAST SQUARES TECHNIQUES FOR HETEROGENEOUS CLUTTER SUPPRESSION

Sparse Sensing in Colocated MIMO Radar: A Matrix Completion Approach

Densità spettrale di clutter

Estimation of the Optimum Rotational Parameter for the Fractional Fourier Transform Using Domain Decomposition

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - Vol. VIII - Design Techniques in the Frequency Domain - Edmunds, J.M. and Munro, N.

A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS

ESTIMATOR STABILITY ANALYSIS IN SLAM. Teresa Vidal-Calleja, Juan Andrade-Cetto, Alberto Sanfeliu

Signal Detection Basics - CFAR

COMPARISON OF MODEL ORDER SELECTION TECHNIQUES FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION PARAMETER ESTIMATION ALGORITHMS

Fusion of Decisions Transmitted Over Fading Channels in Wireless Sensor Networks

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY. CEAS Technical Report 829

Diversity Performance of a Practical Non-Coherent Detect-and-Forward Receiver

BAYESIAN MULTI-TARGET TRACKING WITH SUPERPOSITIONAL MEASUREMENTS USING LABELED RANDOM FINITE SETS. Francesco Papi and Du Yong Kim

PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF CHIRP SIGNALS IN PRESENCE OF STATIONARY NOISE

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 3, March-2015 ISSN

Maximum-Likelihood fitting

MULTICHANNEL SIGNAL PROCESSING USING SPATIAL RANK COVARIANCE MATRICES

Lecture 2. Spring Quarter Statistical Optics. Lecture 2. Characteristic Functions. Transformation of RVs. Sums of RVs

A Machine Learning Approach to Distribution Identification in Non-Gaussian Clutter

Clutter Non Gaussiano e controllo dei falsi allarmi

Clutter Non Gaussiano e controllo dei falsi allarmi

NONLINEAR ECHO CANCELLATION FOR HANDS-FREE SPEAKERPHONES. Bryan S. Nollett and Douglas L. Jones

Transcription:

Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, Madrid, Spain, February -17, 6 (pp376-38) MODELS OF RADAR CLUTTER FROM THE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION R. VICEN-BUENO, M. ROSA-ZURERA, L. CUADRA-RODRIGUEZ and D. DE LA MATA-MOYA Signal Theory and Communications Department Escuela Politécnica Superior, University of Alcalá Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, km. 33.6, 885 Alcalá de Henares - Madrid (SPAIN) E-mails:{raul.vicen, manuel.rosa, lucas.cuadra, david.mata}@uah.es Abstract: The clutter is always present in the radar signal, so it is important to generate models that give us the possibility to minimize its effect in the detection of targets in a radar space. In that way, it is focused this paper, where, we try to propose a model that generates discrete time coherent sequences with a Weibull distribution for its modulus and a Uniform distribution for its phase. The coherent Weibull sequence is achieved in two steps. The fist one generates a coherent correlated Gaussian sequence (CCGS) from a coherent white Gaussian sequence (CWGS) using a correlator filter. The second one generates with a NonLinear MemoryLess Transformation (NLMLT) a coherent correlated Weibull sequence (CCWS) from the CCGS generated before. The covariance matrix of the CCWS desired fixes all the parameters of the correlator filter and the NMLT. This matrix includes the power of the sequence, the correlation coefficient between its samples and the clutter frequency of the sequence that models the radar clutter. Key Words: Radar, Radar Simulation, Clutter Generation, Coherent Weibull, Weibull, Weibull Statistics. 1 Introduction Modelling clutter radar sequences is important to study the detection skills of the radar detectors. In that way, it is generated this investigation. So, several works have developed models of clutter radar based on the Weibull distribution [1] []. So, this model is considered in this article. Other models based on K- distribution and Log-Normal distributions proposed different models of radar clutter [3]. These models are valid for different situations where the radar detector works. The sections and 3 presents the mathematical procedure to obtain a sequence having a Weibull Probability Distribution Function () for the amplitude, a uniform for the phase and an AutoCorrelation Function (ACF), between the successive samples, selected as we want with the use of the covariance matrix. Section introduces the concept of a coherent Weibull random variable (RV) and describes the corresponding statistical properties. The coherent correlated Weibull sequence (CCWS) is dealt with in section 3. It is shown that the CCWS is obtained by feeding with a coherent correlated Gaussian sequence (CCGS) a NonLinear MemoryLess Transformation (NLMLT). The main result of this subsection is the derivation of an explicit relationship between the ACFs of the Gaussian and the Weibull sequences, at the input and the output of the nonlinear device, respectively. The section 4 is dedicated to establish the parameters used to estimate the error and the convenience of using the model proposed. Finally, several trials made to demonstrate the convenience of the proposed model are shown in the section 5 and the conclusions of the developed investigation are given in the section 6. Coherent Weibull random variable Starting with the definition of a complex-valued (i.e. coherent) Weibull random variable w = u+jv, where u and v are the in-phase and quadrature components of the Weibull variable, respectively. The variable w is obtained by multiplying a real-valued Weibull random variable (the amplitude of the coherent variable) by the factor exp(jφ), where φ (the phase of the coherent variable w) is another real-valued random variable evenly distributed in the interval [, π) and independent of the amplitude. The joint of (u, v) is found to be [ p(u, v) = 1 a ( πσ u + v ) a 1 e 1 σ (u +v ) a ] (1)

Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, Madrid, Spain, February -17, 6 (pp376-38) where a is the skewness parameter of the Weibull variable, and σ is related to the power of w. Extending the nomenclature already established for the realvalued Weibull variates [4], we define the scale factor b with ' k Coherent White Gaussian sequence Correlator Filter k Coherent Correlated Gaussian sequence NonLinear MemoryLess Transformation NLMLT wk Coherent Correlated Weibull sequence b = ( σ ) 1 a which is related to the power of w as follows: ( ) E{ } = E{ u + v } = b a Γ a () (3) where Γ() is the Gamma function. The of the amplitude is the well known of the real-valued Weibull variable, namely [4] p() = ab a a 1 e ( ) a b (4) It is also demonstrated that the of the variable tan 1 ( v u) is evenly distributed in the interval [, π), and hence the RV has circular simetry as the coherent Gaussian RV. The amplitude and the phase are independent RVs, i.e. p(, φ) = p()p(φ). The marginal s of u and v are p(u) = p(v) = p(u, v)du (5) The integral can not be solved in closed form in the general case, but rather by resorting to numerical integration. It is found that the variables u, v and w have zero mean values. When a equals, the p(u, v) is Gaussian and the corresponding amplitude is Rayleigh. When a equal 1, an Exponential of the amplitude is obtained. As a goes to zero, the tails of the s of u, v and increase. 3 Model of the coherent Weibull sequence generator The model took for generating coherent Weibull sequences is shown in fig. 1. This generator is composed of two blocks. The first one is the Correlator Filter, which is used to correlate a coherent white Gaussian sequence (CWGS), in order to obtain a coherent correlated Gaussian sequence (CCGS). This block is explained in depth in the subsection 3.1. The second block is used to obtain the coherent correlated Weibull sequence (CCWS) from a CCGS with an specified covariance matrix. This block is explained in depth in the subsection 3.. Figure 1: Generator of coherent correlated Weibull sequences 3.1 Correlator filter The aim of this block is to obtain a CCGS with a desired covariance matrix from a zero mean and unity power CWGS. This covariance matrix involves parameters like the correlation coefficient of the samples and the power of the sequence. This matrix, its properties and the way to obtain it are explained in depth in the subsection 3.. The first step to achieve our objective is to generate a CWGS. This sequence is obtained with (6). ξ [k] = x [k] + jy [k] (6) where k denotes the k-th instant of the sequence and the sequences x and y are real-valued gaussian sequences with zero mean and a power of 1, each. So the sequence ξ has zero mean and unity power. In order to transform the CWGS present at the input of the Correlator Filter in the desired CCGS, it is necessary to obtain the coefficients of this filter. The filter makes the transformation of the sequences like is noted in (7) ξ = U L 1 ξ (7) where U is the matrix with the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix of the desired CCGS (M cg ) and L is the diagonal matrix with the eigenvectors of the M cg matrix. The sizes of both matrixes is NxN, where N is the length of the sequence (column vector) of ξ and ξ. 3. NonLinear MemoryLess Transformation This block deals with the problem to obtain a CCWS with a desired covariance matrix (M cw ) from a CCGS. In order to design it, it is necessary to define which are the parameters of the CCWS and its covariance matrix (M cw ). One way to obtain a CCWS from a CCGS is shown in fig. [5]. In this figure, a denotes the skewness parameter of a Weibull sequence. It is demonstrated in [] that the M cw matrix depends on the power of the CCWS (P cw ), the correlation coefficient of the CCWS (ρ cw ) and its doppler

Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, Madrid, Spain, February -17, 6 (pp376-38) k xk Re k yk Im k Figure : (NLMLT) + 1 1 a X X uk vk j + wk NonLinear MemoryLess Transformation frequency (f cw ). The last parameter is an application of the problem we deal with, the generation of synthetic radar sequences. Expression (8) shows how the M cw matrix is computed knowing these parameters of the sequence. (M cw ) h,k = P cw ρ h k cw ej(π(h k)f cw ) (8) In (8), h and k denote the indexes of the elements of the matrix, where both varies from 1 to N (length of the sequence to generate). Whereas, the M cg matrix is computed with expression (9) in the same way as (8) and with the same kind of parameters but applied to the CCGS, where h and k are the same as used in (8). (M cg ) h,k = P cg ρ h k cg ej(π(h k)f cg) (9) For the expressions (8) and (9), several relationships between their parameters exist. The power of the CCGS (P cg ) is related to the power of the CCWS (P cw ) using the expression (1). The P cw depends only of the a and b parameters of the CCCWS. These parameters, its use and its interpretation are defined for expression (1). where Γ() is the Eulero Gamma function [7] and F (A; B; C; D) is the Gauss Hypergeometric function [7], b is the scale parameter (related with the power of the sequence) and a is the shape parameter (called skewness parameter) of the Weibull sequence. It is appreciated that for a =, the correlation coefficients ρ cw and ρ cg are the same because the sequences at the input (ξ) and at the output (w) coincide. This affirmation can be compared with that obtained in the section for the same value of a. In [5] it is demonstrated that for high values of ρ cg, a linear dependency between ρ cw and ρ cg can be drawn by (13) ρ cw = K a ρ cg + (1 K a ) (13) where K a depends on the value of the skewness parameter of the Weibull sequence. A set of K a values is given in (14) K.6 = 1.758 K.8 = 1.46 K 1. = 1.11 (14) 4 Confidence of the generated sequences The confidence of the generated sequences is measured in two ways, based in the Probability Distribution Function () and based in the covariance matrix. The first one deals with the mean error obtained in the between the theoretical and practical cases. This error is measured with the expression () P cg = b a (1) The doppler frequency of the CCGS (f cg ) is related to the doppler frequency of the CCWS (f cw ) using the expression (11). f cg = f cw (11) The relationship between the correlation coefficient of the CCWS (ρ cw ) and the coefficient of the CCGS (ρ cg ) is given by (1) ρ cw = ρ ( ) cga aγ( a ) 1 ρ a +1 ( 1 cg Γ a + 3 ) ( 1 F a + 3 ; 1 a + 3 ) ; ; ρcg (1) e P DF = 1 M M P DF T H P DF P R () k=1 where M is the number of bins took for the discretization of the theoretical (P DF T H ) and the practical (P DF P R ). The P DF T H is the theoretical of a Weibull sequence with specific a and b parameters. Whereas, the P DF P R is estimated with the histogram of M bins of the generated sequence obtained from the generator proposed in section 3. The second way to measure the confidence of the generated sequence is based in the computation of the mean error of the covariance matrix generated by the generator proposed in section 3. This error can be calculated with expression (16)

5 1 5 3 35 4 Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, Madrid, Spain, February -17, 6 (pp376-38) =.8 a=.6 b=3.3 P cw =db =.9 a=.6 b=3.3 P cw =db 5 5 4 4 3 3 1 1 5 1 5 3 35 4 =.8 a=1. b=8.3 P cw =db =.9 a=1. b=8.3 P cw =db 5 5 4 4 3 3 1 1 5 1 5 3 35 4 5 1 5 3 35 4 Figure 3: Temporal representation of the discrete time Weibull sequence for the same Clutter Power (P cw = db) and different combination of parameters like {ρ cw =.8; a =.6; b = 3.3} and {ρ cw =.8; a = 1.; b = 8.3} Figure 4: Temporal representation of the discrete time Weibull sequence for the same Clutter Power (P cw = db) and different combination of parameters like {ρ cw =.9; a =.6; b = 3.3} and {ρ cw =.9; a = 1.; b = 8.3} e Mc = 1 N N N k=1 n=1 (M c ) h,k ( M c ) h,k (16) where () h,k denotes the indexes of the element the matrixes M c (the desired covariance matrix of the sequence) and M c (the covariance matrix of the generated sequence). The matrix M c can be obtained with the expression (17) M c = E[w w T ] (17) where E[] is the mathematical expectation, w denotes the complex conjugation of the samples that compose the coherent Weibull sequence w and w T denotes the transposition of the matrix (vector) where is stored the coherent Weibull sequence w. 5 Results According to the explanations of the previous sections, here it is shown the results of the analysis of the generated sequences. Figures 3 and 4 show the temporal representation of several Weibull sequences generated with the model we propose. They are generated for coefficient parameters usually used in the generation of radar models [5]. These values of the parameters are ρ cw =.8 and ρ cw =.9, which indicates that the samples of the sequences have a high correlation between them. This effect is perfectly viewed in both figures. The length of the sequences generated is 1 samples, but in the figures is only represented the first 4 samples in order to view it with more detail. In figures 5 and 6 it is shown the theoretical and practical (measured with the histogram) s. As can be observed in both examples, the practical and theoretical s are very similar. This test was made for different values and the s were always very close. So, it can be conclude that the model proposed approximate the Weibull distribution for different combination of parameters. Moreover, the phase distribution of the generated Weibull sequences is uniform, as was taken in the model. This affirmation is made taking into account the results shown in fig. 7. The confidence, based in the error, of the generated sequences gives the following results: e P DF =.e 3 for parameters {ρ cw =.9; a =.6; b = 3.3; P cw = db} and e P DF = 5.e 3 for parameters {ρ cw =.9; a = 1.; b = 8.3; P cw = db}. This errors have been obtained as the mean of several trials. Whereas the confidence based on the covariance matrix error of the generated Weibull sequences is: e Mc =.117 for parameters {ρ cw =.9; a =.6; b = 3.3; P cw = db} and e Mc =.16 for parameters {ρ cw =.9; a = 1.; b = 8.3; P cw = db}. Both errors are very low, so the generated sequences can be taken as correct coherent Weibull sequences. 6 Conclusions As can be observed in the results obtained for the generated sequences, several signs avoid us to think that the model proposed approximate the Weibull distrib-

Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation, Madrid, Spain, February -17, 6 (pp376-38) s of the theoretical and practical Weibull sequence () for pcw=.9;a=.6;b=3.3;pcw=db s of the theoretical and practical Weibull sequence () for pcw=.9;a=1.;b=8.3;pcw=db.4.1 Theoretical Practical Theoretical Practical.1.3.8..6.4.1. 1 3 4 5.5 6 7 8 9 1 5 1 5.1.1.1.8.8.8.6.6.6 3 35 4.1.5 5 1...4.4.4... 4 6 8 Figure 5: Theoretical and Practical s for a discrete time Weibull sequence of parameters {ρcw =.9; a =.6; b = 3.3; Pcw = db} ution we are looking forward. The first sign is that the distribution of the modulus of the coherent sequence is approximated in a correct way by the model proposed. The second sign is that the phase distribution of the coherent sequence has a circular symmetry in the Real Vs Imaginary part representation, what is an indicative that its phase distribution is uniform. And the third one is that the coefficients (errors) took for estimating the confidence of the generated sequences are very low, what is an indication that the model works. References: [1] F. Gini, F. Lombardini and L. Verrazzani, Decentralized CFAR detection with binary integration in Weibull clutter, IEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 33, NO., April 1997, pp. 396-47. [] V. ALOISIO, A. DI VITO and G. GALATI, Optimum detection of moderately fluctuating radar targets, IEE Proc. on Radar, Sonar and Navigation, vol. 141, NO. 3, June 1994, pp. 16417. [3] K. Cheikh and S. Faozi, Application of neural networks to radar signal detection in Kdistributed clutter, First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing Workshop Proceedings, 18-1 July 4, pp. 633-637. [4] D. C. Schleher, Automatic detection and radar data processing, Artech House, 198. [5] A. Farina, A. Russo, F. Scannapieco and S. Barbarossa, Theory of radar detection in coherent 4 6 1 5 3 35 Figure 6: Theoretical and Practical s for a discrete time Weibull sequence of parameters {ρcw =.9; a = 1.; b = 8.3; Pcw = db} 4 3 1 1 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 4 Figure 7: Real Vs Imaginary parts of discrete time Weibull sequence of parameters {ρcw =.9; a =.6; b = 3.3; Pcw = db}. Demonstration that its phase have a circular (uniform) distribution Weibull clutter, in Optimised Radar Processors, IEE Radar, Sonar, Navigation and Avionics Series 1, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., London, UK, 1987, pp. 1-116. [6] A. Farina, A. Russo and F. Scannapieco, Radar detection in coherent Weibull clutter, IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, NO. 6, June 1987, pp. 893895. [7] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series ans products, Academic Press, 1965.