Present Status of the SuperCDMS program

Similar documents
Status of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment

CDMS-II to SuperCDMS

WIMP EXCLUSION RESULTS FROM THE CDMS EXPERIMENT

Identification of the Surface Event Background in the CDMS II Experiment. Sunil Golwala for the CDMS II Collaboration Caltech August 21, 2008

Scalability of the SuperCDMS experiment

Supporting Online Material for

Recent Results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search. Bruno Serfass - UC Berkeley on behalf of the CDMS and SuperCDMS collaborations

CDMS. Vuk Mandic. 13. July 2010

New Results from the CDMS-II experiment

Constraints on Low-Mass WIMP Signals from CDMS. Steven W. Leman (MIT) 18 March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond EW La Thuile, Valle d Aosta, Italy

Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon interactions from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search

Pushing the Limits: Dark Matter Search with SuperCDMS. Wolfgang Rau Queen s University Kingston For the SuperCDMS Collaboration

The CDMS-II Dark Matter Search and SuperCDMS

Analysis of the low-energy electron-recoil spectrum of the CDMS experiment

SuperCDMS at SNOLAB. What is CDMS? Technical Progress. Collaboration. Funding. Schedule and Needs. Why is SuperCDMS 25 kg timely?

Search for Axions with the CDMS Experiment

CDMS and SuperCDMS. SLAC Summer Institute - CDMS. August 2, 2007 Blas Cabrera Co-Spokesperson CDMS & Spokesperson SuperCDMS

Results from CRESST and CDMS

The complex vacuum configurations contribute to an extra non-perturbative term in the QCD Lagrangian[1],

First CDMS II Five-Tower Results. Sunil Golwala SLAC Summer Institute 2008 August 7, 2008

PoS(VERTEX 2009)026. Dark Matter search with Ge detectors. Paul L. Brink 1

Dark Matter Search Results from the Silicon Detectors of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment

The Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) : Status and future. Kipac SLAC April 2009

DUSEL NATIONAL LAB ROLE ESSENTIAL FOR SNOLAB AND DUSEL EXPERIMENTS SLUO

Latest Results on Direct Detection of Dark Matter WIMPs - CDMS & SuperCDMS

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Jun 2004

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 18 Jan 2012

SuperCDMS SNOLAB: A G2 Dark Matter Search. Ben Loer, Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics On behalf of the SuperCDMS Collaboration

Recent results from the second CDMSlite run and overview of SuperCDMS SNOLAB project

Search for Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with CDMS and XENON

Phonon Quasidiffusion in Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Large Germanium Detectors

Direkte Suche nach Dark Matter

The next generation dark matter hunter: XENON1T status and perspective

Dark Matter. and TPC Technologies

Backgrounds and Sensitivity Expectations for XENON100

Sensitivity and Backgrounds of the LUX Dark Matter Search

Review of dark matter direct detection experiments

A survey of recent dark matter direct detection results

Direct Detection in the next five years: Experimental challenges and Phonon Mediated Detectors

Dark Matter Detection and the XENON Experiment. 1 Abstract. 2 Introduction

SuperCDMS: Recent Results for low-mass WIMPS

PoS(idm2008)010. The PICASSO Dark Matter Search Project. A. Davour for the PICASSO collaboration Queen s University

Cryogenic Detectors Direct Dark Matter Search. Dark Matter

Dark Matter Direct Detection

Detectors of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search: Charge Transport and Phonon Emission in Ge 100 Crystals at 40 mk

Searches for Low-Mass WIMPs with CDMS II and SuperCDMS

The EDELWEISS DM search Phase II to Phase III

Monte Carlo Comparisons to a Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Detector with low Transition-Edge-Sensor Transition Temperature

Search for low-mass WIMPs with Spherical Detectors : NEWS-LSM and NEWS-SNO

Direct Detection of Dark Matter with LUX

Overview of Direct Detection Dark Matter Experiments

Direct Search for Dark Matter

DARWIN: dark matter WIMP search with noble liquids

Low energy neutron propagation in MCNPX and GEANT4

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 Jul 2005

Studies of the XENON100 Electromagnetic Background

Sensitivity of sodium iodide cryogenic scintillation-phonon detectors to WIMP signals

Backgrounds in PICO. Eric Vázquez Jáuregui SNOLAB. AARM Meeting Fermilab; Batavia IL, USA; March 19, 2014

arxiv: v3 [physics.ins-det] 4 Oct 2013

The XENON100 Dark Matter Experiment at LNGS: Status and Sensitivity

NEUTRON BACKGROUND STUDIES FOR THE EDELWEISS WIMP SEARCH

LARGE UNDERGROUND XENON

LUX: A Large Underground Xenon detector. WIMP Search. Mani Tripathi, INPAC Meeting. Berkeley, May 5, 2007

Dark Matter Search With The PICASSO Experiment

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 15 Feb 2005

Dark Matter Searches. Andrew Wagner SASS Presentation April 8, 2009

Direct Search for Dark Matter

Edelweiss-II : status and first results A new generation of background-free bolometers for WIMP search

Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter Search

Position calibration of cryogenic dark matter detectors

David Reyna Belkis Cabrera-Palmer AAP2010, Japan

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 4 Nov 2017

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 4 Oct 2014

Technical Specifications and Requirements on Direct detection for Dark Matter Searches

Background and sensitivity predictions for XENON1T

Direct Detection of Dark Matter. Lauren Hsu Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics TRISEP Summer School, June 10, 2014

SuperCDMS SNOLAB: Goals, Design, and Status. Sunil Golwala Caltech DM /02/19

The Search for Dark Matter with the XENON Experiment

WIMP Direct Detection: an outlook

Current status of LUX Dark Matter Experiment

Low Background Experiments and Material Assay. Tessa Johnson NSSC Summer School July 2016

Measuring Dark Matter Properties with High-Energy Colliders

DarkSide. Bianca Bottino Università di Genova and INFN Sezione di Genova on behalf of the DarkSide collaboration 1

Beta Screening Options

Background simulations and shielding calculations

Dark Matter Searches. Marijke Haffke University of Zürich

Dark Matter -- Astrophysical Evidences and Terrestrial Searches

Direct Searches for Dark Matter and the CDMS Experiment

Looking for WIMPs A Review

A Known Unknown: Directly Detecting the Missing Mass of the Universe - The US Perspective

Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA. Chris Kelso Fermilab and University of Chicago Cosmology on the Beach Jan.

THE CRYOGENIC UNDERGROUND OBSERVATORY FOR RARE EVENTS: STATUS AND PROSPECTS

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Nov 2011

PANDA-X A New Detector for Dark Matter Search. Karl Giboni Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Dark Matter Detection with XENON100 Accomplishments, Challenges and the Future

DEAP & CLEAN Detectors for the Direct Detection of Dark Matter

DarkSide-20k and the future Liquid Argon Dark Matter program. Giuliana Fiorillo Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II & INFN Napoli

Esperimenti bolometrici al Gran Sasso: CUORE e CRESST

Towards One Tonne WIMP Direct Detectors: Have we got what it takes?

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

Transcription:

J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 DOI 10.1007/s10909-008-9740-7 Present Status of the SuperCDMS program D.S. Akerib C.N. Bailey D.A. Bauer P.L. Brink R. Bunker B. Cabrera D.O. Caldwell J. Cooley P. Cushman F. DeJongh M.R. Dragowsky L. Duong E. Figueroa-Feliciano J. Filippini S.R. Golwala D.R. Grant J. Hall R. Hennings-Yeomans D. Holmgren M.E. Huber K.D. Irwin R. Mahapatra N. Mirabolfathi H. Nelson L. Novak R.W. Ogburn M. Pyle X. Qiu E. Ramberg W. Rau A. Reisetter T. Saab B. Sadoulet J. Sander R.L. Schmitt R.W. Schnee D.N. Seitz B. Serfass K.M. Sundqvist A. Tomada S. Yellin J. Yoo B.A. Young Received: 22 July 2007 / Accepted: 15 September 2007 / Published online: 25 January 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 P.L. Brink for the SuperCDMS Collaboration. S.R. Golwala California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA D.S. Akerib C.N. Bailey M.R. Dragowsky D.R. Grant R. Hennings-Yeomans R.W. Schnee Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA D.A. Bauer F. DeJongh J. Hall D. Holmgren E. Ramberg R.L. Schmitt J. Yoo Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA E. Figueroa-Feliciano Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA K.D. Irwin National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, USA W. Rau Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada B.A. Young Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA P.L. Brink ( ) B. Cabrera J. Cooley L. Novak R.W. Ogburn M. Pyle A. Tomada S. Yellin Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA e-mail: pbrink@stanford.edu J. Filippini N. Mirabolfathi B. Sadoulet D.N. Seitz B. Serfass K.M. Sundqvist University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA R. Bunker D.O. Caldwell R. Mahapatra H. Nelson J. Sander University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 819 Abstract The expected final reach of the Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) search experiment CDMS-II by the end of 2007 is a WIMP-nucleon crosssection sensitivity of 2.1 10 44 cm 2. To proceed further in our search, we have proposed the SuperCDMS Phase A project that would deploy 42 1-inch thick Ge detectors, at a site deeper than the location of CDMS II, and reach a desired sensitivity goal of 1.3 10 45 cm 2. These cross-sections are of interest and are complementary to Supersymmetry searches at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and future linear colliders. Keywords Dark Matter Cryogenic detectors PACS 14.80 Ly 95.35 +d 1 Introduction The expected WIMP-search sensitivity by the end of the presently running Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) II experiment [1] will begin to explore the region of WIMP-mass nucleon cross-section parameter space motivated by some Supersymmetric extensions beyond the Standard Model of Particle Physics (see Fig. 1). However the small mass and potential backgrounds of CDMS II will probably prevent much further progress than that indicated in Fig. 1 for CDMS II 2007. Thus, a few years ago we proposed a Roadmap [2, 3] for the CDMS technology that would allow deployment of larger mass detectors and address potential background issues to allow a push to even greater WIMP sensitivity. The first goal of the SuperCDMS program, a 25 kg Ge experiment, would utilize 7 SuperTowers (ST) of detectors, each containing 6 Ge detectors of mass 640 g, compared to the 19 Ge detectors of CDMS II of mass 240 g each. As indicated in Fig. 1, the projected WIMP sensitivity of this SuperCDMS Phase A experiment would be 1.3 10 45 cm 2 at 60 GeV/c 2 WIMP mass. This sensitivity would be sufficient to investigate some split-supersymmetry models [4, 5] and benchmarks from the Linear Collider Cosmology (LCC) study [6], along with a significant fraction of msugra models [7]. Performing this experiment at the present CDMS-II site, the Soudan Mine, Minnesota, would likely encounter a background due to muon-induced neutrons. Thus we proposed conducting the SuperCDMS program at a deeper site, the new SNOLAB facility in Canada. A shorter term Detector Development Project whose goal is to operate 2 SuperTowers of 25 mm-thick Ge detectors in the present CDMS II cryogenic facility at Soudan has recently been approved. M.E. Huber University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA T. Saab University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA P. Cushman L. Duong X. Qiu A. Reisetter University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

820 J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 Fig. 1 (Color online) Present (solid curves) and projected (dashed curves) WIMP exclusion limits for present CDMS II and proposed SuperCDMS experiments. The two lower fine-dashed curves indicate the expected sensitivity of the SuperCDMS Phase B (145 kg) and Phase C (1000 kg) experiments. The light (green) [4] anddark (blue) [5] crosses are theoretical predictions from split supersymmetry models. The (black) circles are the constrained MSSM benchmarks from the Linear Collider Cosmology (LCC) study [6]. The shaded regions are msugra theoretical models [7], all with WMAP constraints on the relic density. The darker grey (blue) shaded region also imposes a 1-sigma constraint from the muon g-2 measurement [7] This paper provides an update on our present activities on the SuperCDMS program. We have refined our estimates for background contributions, further validating the need to move to a deeper site. The first SuperCDMS detectors have been successfully fabricated and are undergoing evaluation [8]. The improvements in detector performance required appear to be within reach. 2 Background Contributions in Direct Wimp Search To perform a WIMP search experiment whose sensitivity increases linearly with time requires the search to be background free, with no events that could mimic the nuclear-recoil of interest [2]. Generally, for CDMS-style experiments, site selection and shield design around the cryostat determine the nuclear-recoil background due to neutrons; whereas detector design and surface contamination determine background contributions due to electron recoils. Table 1 contains a summary of our best estimates for all known background contributions to the CDMS experiments, ongoing [1] or planned. We anticipate revisions to our backgrounds budget as further Monte Carlo simulations are performed and more data become available, both from our present detectors at Soudan and neutron data from deeper sites. However, the following conclusions and goals are not expected to change significantly as we go forward.

J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 821 Table 1 Backgrounds expected in 10 40 kev nuclear recoil energy interval during the CDMS II five- Tower and SuperCDMS Detector Projects, and the future SuperCDMS 25 kg Experiment. Event Rates, and number of events {No.}, before veto include events that scatter in multiple detectors. Event rates and number of events for all other categories are for single-scatter events only. The event rates, in units of Events/kg-day, are computed assuming a fiducial volume of 70% of the total mass and a signal efficiency of 70%. The raw exposures assume a 68% duty cycle Background events All scatters Single scatters Leakage Not before veto after veto rejected singles Rate {No.} Rate {No.} Rate {No.} CDMS II Towers 1-5 at Soudan 4.5 kg 485 days (raw 1300 kg-d) Gammas n/a {n/a} 147 {1.3E5} 2.0E-6 4.2E-4 {0.25} Betas n/a {n/a} 0.4 {370} 2.1E-3 1.2E-3 {0.75} Neutrons: radio-nuclides n/a {n/a} 2.0E-5 {0.01} 1 2.0E-5 {0.01} muon-induced 1.1E-2 {7} 1.5E-4 {0.09} 1 1.5E-4 {0.09} SuperCDMS ST 1-2 at Soudan 7.5 kg 550 days (raw 2800 kg-d) Gammas n/a {n/a} 147 {2.9E5} 1.0E-7 2.1E-5 {0.03} Betas n/a {n/a} 0.16 {320} 2.5E-4 5.8E-5 {0.08} Neutrons: radio-nuclides n/a {n/a} 2.0E-5 {0.03} 1 2.0E-5 {0.03} muon-induced 1.1E-2 {15} 1.5E-4 {0.20} 1 1.5E-4 {0.20} SuperCDMS ST 1-7 at SNOLab 25 kg 1100 days (raw 18 tonne-d) Gammas n/a {n/a} 68 {8.6E5} 1.0E-7 1.0E-5 {0.09} Betas n/a {n/a} 0.16 {2000} 2.5E-4 5.8E-5 {0.51} Neutrons: radio-nuclides n/a {n/a} 1.5E-5 {0.13} 1 1.5E-5 {0.13} muon-induced 6.8E-5 {0.6} 4.5E-7 {4E-3} 1 4.5E-7 {0.004} 2.1 Nuclear Recoil Backgrounds The present Soudan CDMS-II veto shield is 94% efficient at identifying muoninduced neutrons interacting with a single detector, with 80% coming from muon tagging, the remainder from detecting associated shower fragments. As indicated in Table 1, we anticipate that muon-induced, fast, neutrons will be the dominant source of background for running the first two SuperTowers at the 2080 meter water equivalent (m.w.e.) deep Soudan site. Figure 2 shows a conceptual sketch for the cryostat and shielding appropriate to conduct a SuperCDMS experiment. At a deep site like SNOLab (6000 m.w.e.), neutrons from fission in the lead shield are expected to be the dominant source of nuclear recoil events, due to radio-nuclides assumed to be present at the 0.1 ppb level (see Table 1).

822 J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 Fig. 2 (Color online) Conceptual sketch of SuperCDMS cryostat and shield. The detector volume is 289 liters, surrounded by several copper cans, the lead shield, the Al vacuum can, the (outer) polyethylene and the active muon veto 2.2 Electron Recoil Backgrounds In order to protect the lead shield shown in Fig. 2 from radon gas and its associated plate-out daughters (a significant gamma background contribution at Soudan) we are considering installing the lead shield inside the outer vacuum chamber of the detector cryostat. Not only does this protect the lead from radon during operation, but the vacuum chamber wall can then be fabricated of aluminium rather than radio-pure copper. As indicated in Table 1, the majority of background events detected by the CDMS detectors are due to gammas or betas. However the CDMS detector technology [1] allows us to reject the majority of these events in our search for true nuclear-recoil events. The detector leakage factor is worse for events classified as betas. These are electron recoil events within a few microns of the detector surface. The increase in detector thickness for SuperCDMS from 10 mm to 25.4 mm is treated as a reduction in the beta rate per unit mass in Table 1. The remaining factor of 8 required in reducing the number of beta events will come from 4 sources [2]. Surface contamination due to radon-plate has dropped considerably for CDMS II Towers 4 and 5 compared to Towers 1 and 2 due to improved radon mitigation measures; the phonon sensor design has been re-optimized to increase the surface area coverage [8]; hydrogenation of the amorphous-si electrodes is also being investigated with some promising results [8]. Finally, analysis of the pulse shapes had already extracted a factor of 3 improvement during the course of CDMS II [9], and we expect further improvements with sensor redesign closely coupled to simulation results and analysis of data.

J Low Temp Phys (2008) 151: 818 823 823 3 SuperCDMS Outlook With the funding of the Detector Development Project, the successful fabrication of the first 25 mm-thick Ge detectors and ongoing characterization results, we are confident that the background goals of both the Detector Development Project and the 25 kg Ge experiment can be accomplished. References 1. N. Mirabolfathi et al., J. Low Temp. Phys., these proceedings, doi:10.1007/s10909-008-9741-6 2. R.W. Schnee et al., SuperCDMS Collaboration, astro-ph/0502435 3. P.L. Brink et al., SuperCDMS Collaboration, astro-ph/0503583 4. G.F. Giudice, A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 65 (2004) 5. A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 70, 075006 (2004) 6. E.A. Baltz et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 103521 (2006), hep-ph/0602187 7. E.A. Baltz, P. Gondolo, J. High Energy Phys. 0410, 052 (2004) 8. C.N. Bailey et al., J. Low Temp. Phys., these proceedings, doi:10.1007/s10909-007-9645-x 9. D.S.Akeribetal.,Phys.Rev.D73, 011102 (2006). CDMS Collaboration