Human-Caused Fires: An Exploratory Pattern Analysis J E N A F E R R A R E S E N I C H O L A S J O N E S D I G I T A L C O M P I L A T I O N A N D D A T A B A S E D E S I G N P O R T L A N D S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y G E O G 5 7 5 F A L L 2 0 1 0 Human Caused Fires: Exploratory Pattern Analysis Introduction Datasets Methods Applications Limitations Questions References A pretty picture http://www.forwolves.org/ralph/wpages/the-great-burn-roadless.htm 1
Introduction Why we chose this project http://wildfirestoday.blogspot.com/ http://www.nps.gov/fire/public/photocontest/photos/05012009140324.jpg http://radiofreemoscow.org/tag/usfs/ Introduction Clearwater National Forest 1.8 million acres 612,400 visitors annually ~11% of fires are humancaused Average cost of large (>10 ac.) human-caused fires: $760,136 lightining-caused fires: $241,077 2
Introduction Database Design Objectives Integrate existing databases and shape files Derive additional useful feature classes Normalize database for efficiency and standardization of present and future data Create domains to limit future data entry options Define relationships that allow for exploration of fire occurrence patterns and predictions Establish topologies that enforce data integrity and ensure valid analyses Datasets Fire Data Points: Ignition Locations for All Fires Polygons: Extents for Fires >10 acres Human Features Data Points: Campgrounds, Boating Sites, Picnic Areas, etc Polylines: Roads and Trails Landscape Data Rasters: Anderson s Fire Behavior Fuel Model 3
Methods Data Organization Data Normalization Data Integrity Enforcement: Domain Establishment Relationship Class Creation Topology Creation and Validation http://alexen.dk/blog/?tag=data-analysis Methods : Data Organization Created two feature datasets to hold spatial layers Raster and Tablular data located in geodatabase root 4
Methods : Normalization Created tables and reclassed spatial data fields to reduce redundancy Methods : Domains Created domains to codify values, ensuring data integrity of current and future data 5
Methods : Relationship Classes Linked tabular and spatial data In Arc10, can be located either with origin or destination data Methods : Topology Defined rules to limit and/or require certain relationships between feature classes Before doing a spatial analysis, features have to be in the correct location 6
Methods : Topology Example Rule : Trailheads must be covered by endpoints of Trails Failed Topology Successfully Validated Where to Move? Applications : Intended Identify problem areas of visitor behavior Identify best allocation of education and prevention resources Highlight high-priority areas for fuel treatments/ mitigation/reduction Inform fire management and enforcement decisions (e.g. campground fire bans, fire patrols, etc ) 7
Applications : Demonstration Clustering analysis of human-caused fires 1. Is there clustering? 2. If so, where is the clustering? 3. Is the clustering related to the presence of a humanmade feature, the available fuels or a combination of both? Applications : Patterns Is there any clustering? Used Average Nearest Neighbor tool Result: 0.78 8
Applications : Patterns Where is the clustering? Used Anselin Local Moran s I Applications : Patterns Is there an association with specific fuel models? 9
Applications : Patterns Applications : Patterns Is there an association with human-made features? Near Analysis of all fires in relation to developed recreation sites 10
Applications : Patterns Average distance to developed recreation feature human-caused fires: 3.5km lightning-caused fires: 3.8km Closest Feature Type: All fires Fires <1km from features Human Lightning Human Lightning Picnic Area 24.6% 3.6% 6.3% 0.5% Campground 13.4% 23.0% 12.5% 6.0% Trailhead 7.5% 10.6% 0.0% 4.7% Dispersed Rec Site 47.0% 52.2% 78.1% 81.9% Lookout Tower 5.2% 9.3% 3.1% 6.5% Boating Site 2.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.5% Interpretation Site 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Conclusions Validation of initial assumption human-caused fires are clustered Anselin local Moran s I conclusion there are hotspots and spatial outliers throughout the study area, further investigation of those locations might be warranted Fuel model association human caused fires have a different concentration than naturally occurring wildfires Recreation association - more closely tied to frontcountry recreation areas 11
Limitations Updating requires revisiting multiple sources Does not consider/include weather data Coarse spatial resolution of fuel model may lead to seemingly erroneous results Ignition points are often best estimate with a lower than optimal accuracy and precision Human actions are more complex than captured in this database Questions? http://www.wjfw.com/stories.html?sku=20100326154512 12
References Anderson, H.E. 1982. Aids to Determining Fuel Models For Estimating Fire Behavior. General Technical Report INT-122. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 28p. Clearwater National Forest. 2006. Trail Guide Descriptions and Information on Selected Trails Within the Clearwater National Forest. 47p. Retrieved from http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/clearwater/visitorinfo/assets/trail_guide.pdf. Accessed 11/13/2010. Clearwater National Forest GIS Library. 2009. http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/clearwater/gis/library.htm Accessed 10/10-11/30/2010. ESRI. ArcGIS Resource Center. Web-based Help. http://resources.arcgis.com/content/web-based-help. Accessed 10/15/2010 12/04/2010. ESRI. ArcGIS: Working with Geodatabase Topology, An ESRI White Paper. 2003. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/geodatabase-topology.pdf. Accessed 11/13/2010. National Visitor Use Monitoring Results. 2009. Clearwater National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Region 1. http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/nvum/2009/clearwater_fy2006.pdf. Accessed 11/28/2010. Olivera, F. and S. Koka. Arc Catalog and Geodatabases. https://ceprofs.civil.tamu.edu/folivera/gis- CE/ArcGISMaterials/03Geodatabases/Class/ArcCatolog%20and%20Geodatabases1.ppt Accessed 11/13/2010. Oregon Department of Forestry. 2005. GIS Metadata CAR Hazard:FBFM. 2p. Scott, J.H. and R.E. Burgan. 2005. Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel s Surface Fire Spread Model. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station. 80p. Wells, G. 2008. The Rothermel Fire-Spread Model: Still Running Like a Champ. Fire Science Digest: 2. 11p. 13