A Statistical Test for the Capacity Coefficient

Similar documents
Bayesian Analyses of the Survivor Interaction Contrast

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Math Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 June 1.

Statistical Measures for Workload Capacity Analysis

Humanistic, and Particularly Classical, Studies as a Preparation for the Law

Lecture 7. Poisson and lifetime processes in risk analysis

General Recognition Theory Extended to Include Response Times: Predictions for a Class of Parallel Systems

A COMPARISON OF POISSON AND BINOMIAL EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD Mai Zhou and Hui Fang University of Kentucky

Stochastic orders of variability

Reminder:!! homework grades and comments are on OAK!! my solutions are on the course web site

Colby College Catalogue

Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Non-parametric Survival Analysis

Colby College Catalogue

Colby College Catalogue

1 Glivenko-Cantelli type theorems

Colby College Catalogue

Analysis of Time-to-Event Data: Chapter 6 - Regression diagnostics

STAT Sample Problem: General Asymptotic Results

From Solute Transport to Chemical Weathering

A Theory of Interactive Parallel Processing: New Capacity Measures and Predictions for a Response Time Inequality Series

Labor and Capital Before the Law

Definitions of the Laplace Transform (1A) Young Won Lim 1/31/15

Introduction to repairable systems STK4400 Spring 2011

Chapter 7: Hypothesis testing

Solutions to the Review Questions

Survival Analysis I (CHL5209H)

Multi-state Models: An Overview

HKBU Institutional Repository

Survival Analysis Math 434 Fall 2011

RT Analysis 2 Contents Abstract 3 Analysis of Response Time Distributions 4 Characterization of Random Variables 5 Density Function

MATH 19B FINAL EXAM PROBABILITY REVIEW PROBLEMS SPRING, 2010

Asymptotics for posterior hazards

PhD course in Advanced survival analysis. One-sample tests. Properties. Idea: (ABGK, sect. V.1.1) Counting process N(t)

A Probabilistic View of Certain Weighted Fibonacci Sums

The Effect of Urea on the Sedimentation Coefficient of the Curly Top Virus Dimer

Product-limit estimators of the survival function with left or right censored data

Surface Groups Within Baumslag Doubles

problem score possible Total 60

First Order ODEs, Part II

The Rotational Spectrum of Chlorine Nitrate (CIONO 2 ): v 6 and the v 5 /v 6 v 9 Dyad

Section 14.1 Vector Functions and Space Curves

OPTIMUM DESIGN ON STEP-STRESS LIFE TESTING

Solutions to the Review Questions

04. Random Variables: Concepts

Solving Systems of Linear Equations Using Matrices

Popular Discontent with Law and Some Proposed Remedies

( t) Cox regression part 2. Outline: Recapitulation. Estimation of cumulative hazards and survival probabilites. Ørnulf Borgan

(1) Recap of Differential Calculus and Integral Calculus (2) Preview of Calculus in three dimensional space (3) Tools for Calculus 3

Growth of Graphene Architectures on SiC

Bias Correction in Classification Tree Construction ICML 2001

ODE Math 3331 (Summer 2014) June 16, 2014

EE (082) Ch. II: Intro. to Signals Lecture 2 Dr. Wajih Abu-Al-Saud

Vector Calculus, Maths II

The Structure and Functions of Proteins

Two Statistical Problems in X-ray Astronomy

EE 445 / 850: Final Examination

1 Differential Equations

EE/PEP 345. Modeling and Simulation. Spring Class 11

Bayesian Life Test Planning for the Weibull Distribution with Given Shape Parameter

β j = coefficient of x j in the model; β = ( β1, β2,

PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR ADDITIVE HAZARD MODELS WITH INTERVAL CENSORED DATA

Asset Pricing. Chapter IX. The Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model. June 20, 2006

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES. Curriculum 2019 SPECIMEN SOLUTIONS

for Time-to-event Data Mei-Ling Ting Lee University of Maryland, College Park

Recent Advances in Reliability Estimation of Time-Dependent Problems Using the Concept of Composite Limit State

Maxima and Minima. (a, b) of R if

Housing Market Monitor

Multivariate random variables

The regression model with one fixed regressor cont d

Model Selection in Bayesian Survival Analysis for a Multi-country Cluster Randomized Trial

Today. Statistical Learning. Coin Flip. Coin Flip. Experiment 1: Heads. Experiment 1: Heads. Which coin will I use? Which coin will I use?

Nonnegative Solutions for a Class of Nonpositone Problems

The branch of mechanics which deals with the motion of object is called dynamics. It is divided into two branches:

Bayesian semiparametric analysis of short- and long- term hazard ratios with covariates

the amount of the data corresponding to the subinterval the width of the subinterval e x2 to the left by 5 units results in another PDF g(x) = 1 π

Math 095 Final Exam Review - MLC

A Gentle Introduction to (or Review of ) Fundamentals of Chemistry and Organic Chemistry

Experimental design of fmri studies

Unfalsifiability and Mutual Translatability of Major Modeling Schemes for Choice Reaction Time

Asymptotics for posterior hazards

7 = 8 (Type a simplified fraction.)

The concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.

Review of Probability. CS1538: Introduction to Simulations

ACCELERATED LIFE MODELS WHEN THE STRESS IS NOT CONSTANT

Exponential Disutility Functions in Transportation Problems: A New Theoretical Justification

RENEWAL PROCESSES AND POISSON PROCESSES

Crowdsourcing Semantics for Big Data in Geoscience Applications

AC Magnetic Heating of Superparamagnetic Fe and Co Nanoparticles

Testing for a unit root in an ar(1) model using three and four moment approximations: symmetric distributions

Using Abel's Theorem to Explain Repeated Roots of the Characteristic Equation

Linear rank statistics

8 Basics of Hypothesis Testing

Practical Statistics

Statistical Inference and Methods

Competing sources of variance reduction in parallel replica Monte Carlo, and optimization in the low temperature limit

1.1. Bacteria Reproduce like Rabbits. (a) A differential equation is an equation. a function, and both the function and its

Information and Credit Risk

Cox s proportional hazards model and Cox s partial likelihood

Survival Analysis. Lu Tian and Richard Olshen Stanford University

Transcription:

Wright State University CORE Scholar Psychology Faculty Publications Psychology 7-16-2011 A Statistical Test for the Capacity Coefficient Joseph W. Houpt Wright State University - Main Campus, joseph.houpt@wright.edu James T. Townsend Follow this and additional works at: http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/psychology Part of the Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Quantitative Psychology Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Repository Citation Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2011). A Statistical Test for the Capacity Coefficient. The 44th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/psychology/8 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact corescholar@www.libraries.wright.edu.

A Statistical Test for the Capacity Coefficient Joseph W. Houpt James T. Townsend INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOBIIHGTON Math Psych '11 Medford, MA July 16, 2011

~ The workload capacity coefficient (C(t)) is a measure of how a persons performance changes with changes in workload. ~ Until now there have been no non-parametric statistical tests for C(t). ~ Develop a statistic test for the capacity coefficient for both OR and AND tasks. ~ Null hypothesis: C(t) = 1 ~ Adapt the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function. ~ Define unbiased and consistent estimators of OR and AND UCIP performance that are Gaussian Processes in the limit.

The Motivation ~ Can we dedicate the same amount of resources to processing each source when there are more sources?

The Motivation ~ Can we dedicate the same amount of resources to processing each source when there are more sources? ~ Fewer resources available for each process as the number of sources mcreases: Lim ited capacity. N=l N=2

The Motivation ~ Can we dedicate the same amount of resources to processing each source when there are more sources? ~ Unchanged amount of resources available for each process as the number of sources increases: Unlimited capacit y. N=l N=2

The Motivation ~ Can we dedicate the same amount of resources to processing each source when there are more sources? ~ More resources available for each process as the number of sources mcreases: Super capacity. N=l N=2

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model.

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unl imited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Pa rallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence First-Terminating (OR) Exhaustive (AND) (Town send & Nozawa, 1995) (Townsend & Wenger, 2004)

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence First-Terminating (OR) Exhaustive (AND) (Town send & Nozawa, 1995) (Townsend & Wenger, 2004)

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence First-Terminating (OR) Exhaustive (AND) (Town send & Nozawa, 1995) (Townsend & Wenger, 2004) SAs(t) SA(t)Ss(t) FAs(t) FA(t)Fs(t) log [SAs(t)] log [SA(t)Ss(t)] log [FAs(t)] log [FA(t)Fs(t)]

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence First-Terminating (OR) Exhaustive (AND) (Town send & Nozawa, 1995) (Townsend & Wenger, 2004) SAs(t) SA(t)Ss(t) FAs(t) FA(t)Fs(t) log [SAs(t)] log [SA(t)Ss(t)] log [FAs(t)] log [FA(t)Fs(t)] HAs(t) HA(t) + Hs(t) KAs(t) KA(t) + Ks(t)

The Measure ~ Fix a baseline for performance: Unlimited Capacity, Independent, Parallel (UCIP) model. ~ No change due to increased workload ~ Stochastic independence First-Terminating (OR) Exhaustive (AND) (Town send & Nozawa, 1995) (Townsend & Wenger, 2004) SAs(t) SA(t)Ss(t) FAs(t) FA(t)Fs(t) log [SAs(t)] log [SA(t)Ss(t)] log [FAs(t)] log [FA(t)Fs(t)] HAs(t) HA(t) + Hs(t) KAs(t) KA(t) + Ks(t) Cor (t) HAs(t) HA(t) + Hs(t) Cand (t) KA(t) + K 8 (t) KAs(t) Hazard Functions: Chechile (2003) Reverse Hazard Functions: Chechile (2011)

The Measure Limited Capacity Worse than predicted by a UCIP model

The Measure Limited Capacity Worse than predicted by a UCIP model - Unlimited Capacity Predicted by a UCIP model - -------

The Measure Limited Capacity Unlimited Capacity Super Capacity Worse than predicted Predicted by a UCIP Better than predicted by a UCIP model model by a UCIP model

The Nelson-Aalen Estimator Cumulative Hazard Function H(t) =lot ~(;(s) 1 ds =-log [1- F(t)] RT =the set of sample response times Y (t) = # of responses that have not occurred as of immediately before t

The Nelson-Aalen Estimator Cumulative Hazard Function ~ Unbiased: E [ H(t)- H(t)] = 0 ~ Consistent: limsize of RT--too H(t) = H(t) ~ [H(t)- H(t)J =?-Gaussian Process (e.g., Aalen, Borgan, & Gjessing, H. K., 2008)

The Nelson-Aalen Estimator Cumulative Reverse Hazard Function 00 K(t) = 1 ;~:~ ds =log [F(t)] G(t) = # of responses that have occurred up to and including t 1 k(t) = L G t t;e{rt> t} ( I)

The Nelson-Aalen Estimator Cumulative Reverse Hazard Function ~ Unbiased: E [ K(t)- K(t)J = 0 ~ Consistent: limsize ofrt---+oo K(t) = K(t) ~ [K(t)- K(t)] ::::} a Gaussian Process

UCI P Performance OR Process m 1 ~ Fucrp(t) = Il[1 ~ Fi(t)] i=l log (1 FiJCJP( t)) ~ log (D[l- F;( t)[) Hucrp(t) = L m i=l log (1 ~ Fi(t)) = L m i=l Hi(t). Hucrp(t) = L m Hi(t) Var ( Hucrp(t)) = L m L Y. 2 1 (t ) i=l i=l tjert(i)< t I J

UCI P Performance AND Process m Fucrp(t) =IT Fi(t) i=l log (FiJCJP(t)) ~log (D. F;(t)) Kucrp(t) = L m i=l log (Fi(t)) = L m i=l Ki(t). Kucrp(t) = L m m 1 Ki(t) Var ( kucrp(t)) =L L G-2(t ) i=l i=l tj ERT(i) < t I J

Test Statistic OR Task k ~ Lor(tj) _ ~ ~ Lor(tj) Zor( t) = ~ Y, ( ) ~ ~ Y: ( ) tje{rt(r)<t} r tj i=l tje{rt (i)<t} i tj Lor(tj) + L L Lor(tj) L Yr (t ) Y. (t ) 1 tje{rt(r) < t} J i=l tje{rt(i)<t} J Var [ Zor (t)] = 2 2 k

Test Statistic OR Task k ~ Lor(tj) _ ~ ~ Lor(tj) Zor( t) = ~ Y, ( ) ~ ~ Y: ( ) tje{rt(r)<t} r tj i=l tje{ RT(i) < t} i tj Lor(tj) + L L Lor(tj) L Yr (t ) Y. (t ) 1 tje{rt(r) < t} J i=l tje{rt(i)<t} J Var [Zor (t)] = 2 2 k Uor = Zor(t) rv N(O 1) Var [Zor (t)] '

Test Statistic AND Task Zand(t) Uand = Var [Zand(t)] "-' N(O, 1)

Weighting Function Lor(t) = Land(t) = Yr (t)(i:t 1 Yi( t)) ; r (t)+i:l Y;(t) if for all i, ~(t) > 0 { otherwise Gr (t)(i:t- 1 Gi(t)) ; r (t)+i:l Gi(t) if for all i, Gi(t) > 0 { otherwise

OR: Exponential Race Model Cor (t) < 1 Power as a Function of Trials and C(t) 1.0 0.8 O.S 0.4 Power 0.2 0.0

OR: Exponential Race Model Cor (t) > 1 Power as a Function of Trials and C(t) 1.0 Power 0.8 O.S 0.4 0.2 0.0

The Task pp PA AP AA

The Results OR Ca acit OR Task AND Task BJ -10.75 *** 2.88 ** RS -4.67 *** 2.93 ** JS -8.41 *** 3.16 *** MB -7.12*** 2.87 ** RM -9.69 *** 3.06 ** LB -3.02 ** 2.70 ** AND Capacity JG -5.54 *** 3.01 ** WY -6.08 *** 2.99 ** AW -5.75 *** 2.88 ** * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p 0.001 < "

~ Adapted the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function.

~ Adapted the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function. ~ Defined unbiased and consistent estimators of 0 R and AND UCIP performance that are Gaussian Processes in the limit.

~ Adapted the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function. ~ Defined unbiased and consistent estimators of 0 R and AND UCIP performance that are Gaussian Processes in the limit. ~ Developed a statistical test for the capacity coefficient for both OR and AND tasks. ~ Null hypothesis: C(t) = 1

~ Adapted the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function. ~ Defined unbiased and consistent estimators of 0 R and AND UCIP performance that are Gaussian Processes in the limit. ~ Developed a statistical test for the capacity coefficient for both OR and AND tasks. ~ Null hypothesis: C(t) = 1 ~ Yes, we are working on a non-parametric Bayesian C( t) test (with Andrew Heathcote)

~ Adapted the Nelson-Aalen Estimator for the cumulative reverse hazard function. ~ Defined unbiased and consistent estimators of 0 R and AND UCIP performance that are Gaussian Processes in the limit. ~ Developed a statistical test for the capacity coefficient for both OR and AND tasks. ~ Null hypothesis: C(t) = 1 ~ Yes, we are working on a non-parametric Bayesian C( t) test (with Andrew Heathcote) Thank you I