Physics 6C. Special Relativity. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

Similar documents
Chapter 35. Special Theory of Relativity (1905)

Chapter 26 Lecture Notes

The Special Theory of Relativity

If the speed of light were smaller than it is, would relativistic phenomena be more or less conspicuous than they are now?

The Lorenz Transform

Today: Review of SR. Einstein s Postulates of Relativity (Abbreviated versions) Let's start with a few important concepts

Chapter Outline The Relativity of Time and Time Dilation The Relativistic Addition of Velocities Relativistic Energy and E= mc 2

Chapter 39 Relativity

Special Relativity Einstein

Announcements. Today s class. The Lorentz transformation. Lorentz transformation (Relativistic version of Galileo transformation)

Relativity III. Review: Kinetic Energy. Example: He beam from THIA K = 300keV v =? Exact vs non-relativistic calculations Q.37-3.

Physics 43 HW 2 Chapter 39 Problems given from 7 th Edition

Simultaneity. CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 2. Gedanken (Thought) experiments. The complete Lorentz Transformation. Re-evaluation of Time!

Time Contraction: The Possibility of Faster Than Light without Violation of Lorentz Transformation or Causality and the Vacuum Energy Dependent

Chapter 28 Special Relativity

Special Relativity. Relativity

Einstein s theory of special relativity

PHYSICS FOR THE IB DIPLOMA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Relativity fundamentals explained well (I hope) Walter F. Smith, Haverford College

arxiv:physics/ Oct 2002

8.022 (E&M) Lecture 11

( x vt) m (0.80)(3 10 m/s)( s) 1200 m m/s m/s m s 330 s c. 3.

Lecture 3 - Lorentz Transformations

CHAPTER 26 The Special Theory of Relativity

MOVING OBJECTS OBSERVATION THEORY IN PLACE OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY

VII. Relativistic optics. Electromagnetic fields in inertial frames of reference. dt j ( ) ψ = 0. ri r j. Galilean transformation

Special and General Relativity

Agenda 2/12/2017. Modern Physics for Frommies V Gravitation Lecture 6. Special Relativity Einstein s Postulates. Einstein s Postulates

Test of General Relativity Theory by Investigating the Conservation of Energy in a Relativistic Free Fall in the Uniform Gravitational Field

Journal of Theoretics Vol.5-2 Guest Commentary Relativistic Thermodynamics for the Introductory Physics Course

Relativistic Dynamics

τ = 10 seconds . In a non-relativistic N 1 = N The muon survival is given by the law of radioactive decay N(t)=N exp /.

Doppler Effect (Text 1.3)

The Lorentz Transform 2

Special Relativity Simply Debunked in Five Steps!

Relativity and Astrophysics Lecture 10 Terry Herter. Doppler Shift The Expanding Universe Hubble s discovery

Special Relativity Electromagnetic and Gravitation combined Into one theory

Electromagnetic Theory Prof. Ruiz, UNC Asheville, doctorphys on YouTube Chapter B Notes. Special Relativity. B1. The Rotation Matrix

The Thomas Precession Factor in Spin-Orbit Interaction

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 Jan 2018

On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity. Stephen J. Crothers. 22 nd February, 2017

Espen Gaarder Haug Norwegian University of Life Sciences January 5, 2017

arxiv:physics/ v4 [physics.gen-ph] 9 Oct 2006

Pseudo-Superluminal Motion 1

Announcements. Review: Lorentz & velocity transformations (relativistic version of Galileo) Transformations (in 1D) Some examples

If velocity of A relative to ground = velocity of B relative to ground = the velocity of A relative to B =

Name Solutions to Test 1 September 23, 2016

Recapitulate. Prof. Shiva Prasad, Department of Physics, IIT Bombay

On the quantitative effects

Volume Charge Density in Most General Lorentz Transformation

Special Relativity Entirely New Explanation

Electromagnetism and Relativity

Millennium Relativity Acceleration Composition. The Relativistic Relationship between Acceleration and Uniform Motion

Relativistic Addition of Velocities *

On the derivation of the Lorentz-transformation

Physics Essays volume 16, number 3, 2003

Transformation of Orbital Angular Momentum and Spin Angular Momentum

Relativistic Analysis of Doppler Effect and Aberration based on Vectorial Lorentz Transformations

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture : Jan 11th 200. First Quiz This Friday!

Doppler-Voigt-Einstein Selforganization The Mechanism for Information Transfer

Relativity in Classical Physics

l. For adjacent fringes, m dsin m

A Classical Reconstruction of Relativity

THE TWIN PARADOX A RELATIVISTIC DOMAIN RESOLUTION

DO PHYSICS ONLINE. SPECIAL RELATIVITY Frames of Reference

1. RELATIVISTIC KINEMATICS

How the Thrust of Shawyer s Thruster can be Strongly Increased

TWO WAYS TO DISTINGUISH ONE INERTIAL FRAME FROM ANOTHER

TWO WAYS TO DISTINGUISH ONE INERTIAL FRAME FROM ANOTHER

Final Review. A Puzzle... Special Relativity. Direction of the Force. Moving at the Speed of Light

MOTION OF AN ELECTRON IN CLASSICAL AND RELATIVISTIC ELECTRODYNAMICS AND AN ALTERNATIVE ELECTRODYNAMICS

Does Heisenberg s Uncertainty Collapse at the Planck Scale? Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle Becomes the Certainty Principle

Department of Natural Sciences Clayton State University. Physics 3650 Quiz 1. c. Both kinetic and elastic potential energies can be negative.

Journal of Physical Mathematics

Ch. 38: Special Relativity End of Chapter Problem Solutions

Intro to Nuclear and Particle Physics (5110)

Armenian Theory of Special Relativity (Illustrated) Robert Nazaryan 1 and Haik Nazaryan 2

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.class-ph] 8 Aug 2003

Journal of Theoretics Vol.4-4

Critical Reflections on the Hafele and Keating Experiment

Einstein's Energy Formula Must Be Revised

SPH4U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS

Moment of inertia: (1.3) Kinetic energy of rotation: Angular momentum of a solid object rotating around a fixed axis: Wave particle relationships: ω =

). In accordance with the Lorentz transformations for the space-time coordinates of the same event, the space coordinates become

The Laws of Acceleration

THE ESSENTIAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MASS AND ENERGY

Einstein s Three Mistakes in Special Relativity Revealed. Copyright Joseph A. Rybczyk

Generation of EM waves

Simple Considerations on the Cosmological Redshift

Copyright 2012 Nelson Education Ltd. Unit 5: Revolutions in Modern Physics U5-13

physics/ Nov 1999

Espen Gaarder Haug Norwegian University of Life Sciences April 4, 2017

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1

Module 5: Red Recedes, Blue Approaches. UNC-TFA H.S. Astronomy Collaboration, Copyright 2012

The gravitational phenomena without the curved spacetime

23.1 Tuning controllers, in the large view Quoting from Section 16.7:

a) What is the duration of the trip according to Ginette? b) What is the duration of the trip according to Tony?

Electromagnetic Waves

Physics; Watching the Game From the Outside

An iterative least-square method suitable for solving large sparse matrices

Transcription:

Physis 6C Speial Relatiity

Two Main Ideas The Postulates of Speial Relatiity Light traels at the same speed in all inertial referene frames. Laws of physis yield idential results in all inertial referene frames.

Two Main Ideas The Postulates of Speial Relatiity Light traels at the same speed in all inertial referene frames. Laws of physis yield idential results in all inertial referene frames. Inertial referene frames refer to obserers moing at onstant eloity with respet to eah other.

Two Main Ideas The Postulates of Speial Relatiity Light traels at the same speed in all inertial referene frames. Laws of physis yield idential results in all inertial referene frames. Inertial referene frames refer to obserers moing at onstant eloity with respet to eah other. If there is a nonzero aeleration, the frames are not inertial, and we would need to use General Relatiity. Way too muh math for this ourse sorry

Two Main Ideas The Postulates of Speial Relatiity Light traels at the same speed in all inertial referene frames. Laws of physis yield idential results in all inertial referene frames. Inertial referene frames refer to obserers moing at onstant eloity with respet to eah other. If there is a nonzero aeleration, the frames are not inertial, and we would need to use General Relatiity. Way too muh math for this ourse sorry The relationship between what is seen in the two referene frames is found ia the Lorentz Transformation. We will see the following fator in all of our equations: 1 1 Here is the relatie speed of the frames, and is the speed of light.

The main results of Speial Relatiity are the following: 1) Time Dilation - if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure times to be longer (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) t t t t 1 t refers to the objet at rest in its own frame

The main results of Speial Relatiity are the following: 1) Time Dilation - if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure times to be longer (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) t t t t 1 t refers to the objet at rest in its own frame ) Length Contration if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure lengths to be shorter in the diretion of motion (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) L L L L 1 L refers to the objet at rest in its own frame

The main results of Speial Relatiity are the following: 1) Time Dilation - if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure times to be longer (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) t t t t 1 t refers to the objet at rest in its own frame ) Length Contration if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure lengths to be shorter in the diretion of motion (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) L L 1 L L L refers to the objet at rest in its own frame 3) Addition of eloities is more ompliated than in the non-relatiisti ase. At low speeds, we just add or subtrat the relatie eloities and it works fine, but near the speed of light we need to be more areful. Here s a formula: = V V 1 V is the relatie speed between the frames, and and are the eloities of the objet in eah frame. This formula is triky to use, so pratie seeral examples.

The main results of Speial Relatiity are the following: 1) Time Dilation - if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure times to be longer (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) t t t t 1 t refers to the objet at rest in its own frame ) Length Contration if an objet is moing, an obserer will measure lengths to be shorter in the diretion of motion (ompared to the frame of the objet itself) L L L L 1 L refers to the objet at rest in its own frame 3) Addition of eloities is more ompliated than in the non-relatiisti ase. At low speeds, we just add or subtrat the relatie eloities and it works fine, but near the speed of light we need to be more areful. Here s a formula: = V V 1 V is the relatie speed between the frames, and and are the eloities of the objet in eah frame. This formula is triky to use, so pratie seeral examples. 4) Energy and Mass are equialent (E rest =m ). We an also get formulas for relatiisti momentum and total energy. p m 1 E total m 1 K E rest

http://www.youtube.om/wath?=jqnhtkzbti4 http://www.youtube.om/wath?=cigmlyya7u&nr=1 http://www.youtube.om/wath?=ppfzpqlwif Visual demonstrations of speial relatiity.

In the year 84, a spaeraft flies oer Moon Station III at a speed of.8. A sientist on the moon measures the length of the moing spaeraft to be 14 m. The spaeraft later lands on the moon, and the same sientist measures the length of the now stationary spaeraft. What alue does she get?

In the year 84, a spaeraft flies oer Moon Station III at a speed of.8. A sientist on the moon measures the length of the moing spaeraft to be 14 m. The spaeraft later lands on the moon, and the same sientist measures the length of the now stationary spaeraft. What alue does she get? Use the length ontration formula with L=14m and =.8. We are looking for L. L L 1

In the year 84, a spaeraft flies oer Moon Station III at a speed of.8. A sientist on the moon measures the length of the moing spaeraft to be 14 m. The spaeraft later lands on the moon, and the same sientist measures the length of the now stationary spaeraft. What alue does she get? Use the length ontration formula with L=14m and =.8. We are looking for L. L L 1 14m L 1.8

In the year 84, a spaeraft flies oer Moon Station III at a speed of.8. A sientist on the moon measures the length of the moing spaeraft to be 14 m. The spaeraft later lands on the moon, and the same sientist measures the length of the now stationary spaeraft. What alue does she get? Use the length ontration formula with L=14m and =.8. We are looking for L. L L 14m L 14m L L 1 33m 1.6.8 Notie that anels out. This usually happens when you use speeds written in terms of. Our result is onsistent with the onept of length ontration. The ship is measured to be shorter when it is moing.

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship?

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship? We will be using the time dilation formula. Notie the differene between part a) and part b) In part a) the time as measured on the spaeship is gien. This is Δt beause the pendulum is at rest relatie to the ship.

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship? We will be using the time dilation formula. Notie the differene between part a) and part b) In part a) the time as measured on the spaeship is gien. This is Δt beause the pendulum is at rest relatie to the ship. t t 1

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship? We will be using the time dilation formula. Notie the differene between part a) and part b) In part a) the time as measured on the spaeship is gien. This is Δt beause the pendulum is at rest relatie to the ship. t t 1.5s t t.3s 1.75 1 The people on earth measure a longer (dilated) time for eah swing, as expeted.

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship? We will be using the time dilation formula. Notie the differene between part a) and part b) In part a) the time as measured on the spaeship is gien. This is Δt beause the pendulum is at rest relatie to the ship. t t 1.5s t t.3s 1.75 1 The people on earth measure a longer (dilated) time for eah swing, as expeted. Part b) uses the same formula, but now we are gien Δt instead.

Inside a spaeship flying past the earth at ¾ the speed of light, a pendulum is swinging. a) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by an astronaut performing an experiment inside the spaeship, how long will the swing take as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth who is wathing the experiment? b) If eah swing takes 1.5 s as measured by a person at mission ontrol on earth, how long will the swing take as measured by an astronaut inside the spaeship? We will be using the time dilation formula. Notie the differene between part a) and part b) In part a) the time as measured on the spaeship is gien. This is Δt beause the pendulum is at rest relatie to the ship. t t 1.5s t t.3s 1.75 1 The people on earth measure a longer (dilated) time for eah swing, as expeted. Part b) uses the same formula, but now we are gien Δt instead. t t t 1.5s t 1.75 1 1.s Again the people on earth measure a longer time beause the lok is moing relatie to them.

Two partiles are reated in a high-energy aelerator and moe off in opposite diretions. The speed of one partile, as measured in the laboratory, is.65, and the speed of eah partile relatie to the other is.95. What is the speed of the seond partile, as measured in the laboratory?

Two partiles are reated in a high-energy aelerator and moe off in opposite diretions. The speed of one partile, as measured in the laboratory, is.65, and the speed of eah partile relatie to the other is.95. What is the speed of the seond partile, as measured in the laboratory? Pitures will probably help here =? 1 -V=.65 = V V 1 this is the lab This is what you see in the laboratory frame. Partile 1 is moing at.65, and Partile is moing the other diretion.

Two partiles are reated in a high-energy aelerator and moe off in opposite diretions. The speed of one partile, as measured in the laboratory, is.65, and the speed of eah partile relatie to the other is.95. What is the speed of the seond partile, as measured in the laboratory? Pitures will probably help here =? 1 -V=.65 = V V 1 this is the lab This is what you see in the laboratory frame. Partile 1 is moing at.65, and Partile is moing the other diretion. V=-.65 =-.95 1 This is the same senario in the referene frame of Partile 1. Partile is moing away at -.95, and Partile 1 is at rest in its own frame.

Two partiles are reated in a high-energy aelerator and moe off in opposite diretions. The speed of one partile, as measured in the laboratory, is.65, and the speed of eah partile relatie to the other is.95. What is the speed of the seond partile, as measured in the laboratory? Pitures will probably help here =? 1 -V=.65 = V V 1 this is the lab This is what you see in the laboratory frame. Partile 1 is moing at.65, and Partile is moing the other diretion..95 (.65).65.95 1.3 1.6175.78 V=-.65 =-.95 1 So in the lab, Partile looks like it is moing to the left at speed.78. This is the same senario in the referene frame of Partile 1. Partile is moing away at -.95, and Partile 1 is at rest in its own frame.

Here s a sample problem: The sun produes energy by nulear fusion reations, in whih matter is onerted to energy. The rate of energy prodution is 3.8 x 1 6 Watts. How many kilograms of mass does the sun onert to energy eah seond?

Here s a sample problem: The sun produes energy by nulear fusion reations, in whih matter is onerted to energy. The rate of energy prodution is 3.8 x 1 6 Watts. How many kilograms of mass does the sun onert to energy eah seond? We only need to use Einstein s E=m for this one.

Here s a sample problem: The sun produes energy by nulear fusion reations, in whih matter is onerted to energy. The rate of energy prodution is 3.8 x 1 6 Watts. How many kilograms of mass does the sun onert to energy eah seond? We only need to use Einstein s E=m for this one. 6 3.8 1 J m 9 m 4. 1 kg 8 3 1 m s Remember, a Watt is a Joule per seond