L-mode DB 2.7: new contributions from FT/FTU and some analysis

Similar documents
Contents. Fitting Pedestal data to a) Thermal Conduction Model. b) MHD Limit Model. Determining scaling of Core.

GLOBAL ENERGY CONFINEMENT SCALING, UNCERTAINTIES, AND PROJECTIONS TO ITER

Confinement Understanding and the Extrapolation to ITER

THRESHOLD POWER AND ENERGY CONFINEMENT FOR ITER

Summary of CDBM Joint Experiments

STUDY OF ADVANCED TOKAMAK PERFORMANCE USING THE INTERNATIONAL TOKAMAK PHYSICS ACTIVITY DATABASE

Correlation Between Plasma Rotation and Electron Temperature Gradient Scale Length in LOC/SOC Transition at Alcator C-Mod

A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION INTO ENERGY TRANSPORT IN HIGH TEMPERATURE TOKAMAK PLASMAS

ECRH Results during Current Ramp-up and Post-Pellet Injection in FTU Plasma

Physics Basis of ITER-FEAT

1997 PRIORITIES FOR ITER PHYSICS RESEARCH S A1 OT F 1

Remarks to the H-mode workshop paper

Divertor Requirements and Performance in ITER

TOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS - Summary -

Characteristics of the H-mode H and Extrapolation to ITER

Understanding Confinement in Advanced Inductive Scenario Plasmas Dependence on Gyroradius and Rotation

The International Multi-Tokamak Profile Database

Alcator C-Mod. Double Transport Barrier Plasmas. in Alcator C-Mod. J.E. Rice for the C-Mod Group. MIT PSFC, Cambridge, MA 02139

Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER

TH/P8-4 Second Ballooning Stability Effect on H-mode Pedestal Scalings

Principles of Nuclear Fusion & Fusion research in Belgium R. R. Weynants

Transport and Boundary Physics: Summary Review. contact of author:

FAST 1 : a Physics and Technology Experiment on the Fusion Road Map

Combined LH and ECH Experiments in the FTU Tokamak

Relevant spatial and time scale in tokamaks. F. Bombarda ENEA-Frascati, FSN-FUSPHY-SAD

NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU. General Atomics. Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997

Confinement Study of Net-Current Free Toroidal Plasmas Based on Extended International Stellarator Database

BO Non-Local Heat Transport, Rotation Reversals and Up/Down Impurity Density Asymmetries in Alcator C-Mod Ohmic L-mode Plasmas. J.E.

Improved Plasma Confinement by Ion Bernstein Waves (IBWs) Interacting with Ions in JET

Improved Plasma Confinement by Ion Bernstein Waves (IBWs) Interacting with Ions in JET (Joint European Torus)

Integrated Transport Modeling of High-Field Tokamak Burning Plasma Devices

Mission and Design of the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE)

Sizing Up Plasmas Using Dimensionless Parameters

Bolometry. H. Kroegler Assciazione Euratom-ENEA sulla Fusione, Frascati (Italy)

JET JET JET EFDA THE JOINT EUROPEAN TORUS A EUROPEAN SUCCESS STORY

Design of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system

Comparison of Critical Values of R/L Te. for ETG Modes Based on an Analytic Expression. with GKS Simulations for DIII-D Discharges

Increased understanding of the dynamics and transport in ITB plasmas from multi-machine comparisons

The 2008 Public Release of the International Multi-tokamak Confinement Profile Database

Status of and Prospects for Advanced Tokamak Regimes from Multi-Machine Comparisons using the International Tokamak Physics Activity database

DYNAMICS OF THE FORMATION, SUSTAINMENT, AND DESTRUCTION OF TRANSPORT BARRIERS IN MAGNETICALLY CONTAINED FUSION PLASMAS

1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY

Comparison of Pellet Injection Measurements with a Pellet Cloud Drift Model on the DIII-D Tokamak

Alpha Particle Transport Induced by Alfvénic Instabilities in Proposed Burning Plasma Scenarios

Investigation of Intrinsic Rotation Dependencies in Alcator C-Mod

Electron Transport and Improved Confinement on Tore Supra

Role of Magnetic Configuration and Heating Power in ITB Formation in JET.

Triggering Mechanisms for Transport Barriers

Snakes and similar coherent structures in tokamaks

On active mitigation of runaway electrons during tokamak disruptions

Wave Form of Current Quench during Disruptions in Tokamaks

Overview of Tokamak Rotation and Momentum Transport Phenomenology and Motivations

Deuterium experiment project on LHD and impact of plasma ion species on confinement

and expectations for the future

Comparison of ITER Performance Predicted by Semi-Empirical and Theory-Based Transport Models

Key Quantities for ITB Formation and Sustainment

CONFINEMENT IN TOKAMAKS J.ONGENA

C-Mod Transport Program

ECRH Results during Current Ramp-up and Post-Pellet Injection in FTU Plasma

INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION

Effects of Alpha Particle Transport Driven by Alfvénic Instabilities on Proposed Burning Plasma Scenarios on ITER

Fusion Energy: Pipe Dream or Panacea

Q, Break-even and the nτ E Diagram for Transient Fusion Plasmas

Summer College on Plasma Physics August Physics of Edge Transport Barriers and Importance for Fusion Experiments

Recent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science

Current density modelling in JET and JT-60U identity plasma experiments. Paula Sirén

Tokamak operation at low q and scaling toward a fusion machine. R. Paccagnella^

Blob motion and control. simple magnetized plasmas

Turbulent Transport Analysis of JET H-mode and Hybrid Plasmas using QuaLiKiz, TGLF and GLF23

MHD Internal Transport Barrier Triggering in Low Positive Magnetic Shear Scenarios in JET

Dependence of non-local effects on plasma parameters during cold-pulse experiments in Alcator C-Mod

Reduction of Turbulence and Transport in the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak by Dilution of Deuterium Ions with Nitrogen and Neon Injection

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 22 nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Geneva, Switzerland, October 2008

Fast ion physics in the C-2U advanced, beam-driven FRC

Optimization of Plasma Initiation Scenarios in JT-60SA

MHD-particle simulations and collective alpha-particle transport: analysis of ITER scenarios and perspectives for integrated modelling

DIII D I. INTRODUCTION QTYUIOP

L Aquila, Maggio 2002

Impurity Transport Studies of Intrinsic MO and Injected Ge in High Temperature ECRH Heated FTU Tokamak Plasmas

High fusion performance at high T i /T e in JET-ILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing

EX/C3-5Rb Relationship between particle and heat transport in JT-60U plasmas with internal transport barrier

HFS PELLET REFUELING FOR HIGH DENSITY TOKAMAK OPERATION

Transport and turbulence reduction with negative triangularity : Correlation ECE measurements in TCV

Experimental Achievements on Plasma Confinement and Turbulence

The performance of improved H-modes at ASDEX Upgrade and projection to ITER

FIRE. D. Meade. Presented at UFA Burning Plasma Science Workshop II General Atomics San Diego, CA. May 1, Lighting the Way to Fusion FIRE

L-Mode and Inter-ELM Divertor Particle and Heat Flux Width Scaling on MAST

Characterization of neo-classical tearing modes in high-performance I- mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator C-Mod

Correlations of ELM frequency with pedestal plasma characteristics

High Performance Operational Limits of Tokamak and Helical Systems

Tokamak profile database construction incorporating Gaussian process regression

Progress in Transport Modelling of Internal Transport Barrier Plasmas in JET

S1/2 EX/S, EX/D, EX/W

Non-ohmic ignition scenarios in Ignitor

OV/2-5: Overview of Alcator C-Mod Results

Plasma Start-Up Results with EC Assisted Breakdown on FTU

EX8/3 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Geneva

Progress in characterization of the H-mode pedestal

Overview the CASTOR Fast Particles experiments

Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks

Transcription:

Confinement Database and Modelling Meeting 2-5 April, 2001 - Lausanne L-mode DB 2.7: new contributions from FT/FTU and some analysis G. Bracco Associazione Euratom-ENEA sulla Fusione, Frascati

Outline L mode DB vs 2.7, released 26/3/2001 L mode regressions, B t dependence Saturated OH confinement analysis New FT/FTU contribution (FT Hydrogen data) FTU data with pellet injection Conclusions

L mode DB version 2.7 TOKAMAK N DB23a BMIN BMAX H D HE3 HE4 M=1.5 ALCC 1039 6.07 12.57 113 926 ASDEX 639 98 1.01 2.82 104 535 CMOD 611 611 3.35 7.67 46 565 D3D 161 161 1.28 2.15 36 111 14 DIII 210 210 0.61 2.4 210 FT 273 2.43 9.99 20 253 FTU 300 255 2.48 8.04 22 278 JET 3516 433 1.56 3.87 156 2807 175 317 61 JFT2M 137 137 0.66 1.41 24 111 2 JT60 622 622 2.32 4.72 622 PBXM 31 31 1.25 1.36 31 PDX 51 51 0.7 2.2 51 RTP 18 1.94 2.2 18 START 21 21 0.2 0.42 21 T10 58 40 2.42 3.07 58 TDEV 14 14 1.77 1.77 14 TEXTOR 274 274 1.9 2.36 274 TFTR 409 409 1.27 4.82 14 395 TSUPRA 322 261 2.09 3.95 18 140 164 Tot: 8706 data new data since version 2.3a: ALCC, ASDEX, FT, FTU, JET, RTP, T10, TSUPRA A preliminary version 3.0 was presented at Frascati meeting Sept 2000; This version 2.7 contains the results of some clean-up work

L mode DB version 2.7: MEFF & PHASE (1) D TOKAMAK N BMIN BMAX OH L I EP ALCC 926 6.07 12.57 926 ASDEX 535 1.26 2.82 350 185 CMOD 565 3.35 7.67 339 226 D3D 111 1.28 2.15 111 DIII 210 0.61 2.4 210 FT 253 2.43 9.99 253 FTU 278 2.48 8.04 264 14 JET 2807 1.6 3.87 2543 264 JFT2M 111 0.7 1.41 111 PBXM 31 1.25 1.36 31 START 21 0.2 0.42 21 T10 58 2.42 3.07 28 30 TDEV 14 1.77 1.77 3 11 TEXTOR 274 1.9 2.36 99 82 93 TFTR 395 1.27 4.82 395 TSUPRA 140 2.96 3.88 33 65 42

L mode DB version 2.7: MEFF & PHASE (2) H TOKAMAK N BMIN BMAX OH L ALCC 113 6.23 10.05 113 ASDEX 104 1.01 2.8 52 52 CMOD 46 4.63 5.22 46 D3D 36 2.02 2.13 36 FT 20 5.97 6.06 20 FTU 22 5.72 5.82 22 JET 156 1.56 3.38 156 JFT2M 24 0.66 1.27 24 JT60 622 2.32 4.72 190 432 PDX 51 0.7 2.2 11 40 RTP 18 1.94 2.2 8 10 TFTR 14 3.51 4.14 14 TSUPRA 18 3.94 3.95 8 10 HE3 TOKAMAK NBMINBMAXOH L JET 175 1.71 3.48 175 LHEP EP M=1.5 TOKAMAK NBMINBMAXOH L LHEP EP JET 61 1.72 3.52 61 HE4 TOKAMAK NBMINBMAXOH L LHEP EP D3D 14 2.08 2.1 14 JET 317 1.62 3.7 317 JFT2M 2 1.15 1.17 2 TSUPRA 164 2.09 3.92 51 59 23 31

L mode: regression for data in DB2.3a 1498 data τ freefit =0.022 I 0.93 B 0.06 P -0.71 n 0.41 M 0.19 R 1.81 ε -0.03 k 0.69 RMSE=0.155 τ L96P(th) =0.023 I 0.96 B 0.03 P -0.73 n 0.40 M 0.2 R 1.83 ε -0.06 k 0.64 Free fit: by changing the R exponent to 1.84 the high-β constr. is fulfilled; The high-β constrained fit is practically the same Bohm ρ* dependence. Result very similar to ITERL96P(th) Selection criteria: ISELDB2=11 H, D, PHASE=L, BEILI2<2

L mode: constrained regression including new data τ constr =0.022 I 0.89 B 0.09 P -0.72 n 0.42 M 0.22 R 1.88 ε -0.05 k 0.71 RMSE=0.156 τ L96P(th) =0.023 I 0.96 B 0.03 P -0.73 n 0.40 M 0.2 R 1.83 ε -0.06 k 0.64 1704 data from 14 tokamaks new tokamaks FTU, RTP, T10 more data from TSUPRA The free fit is practically the same Bohm ρ* dependence. Result very similar to ITERL96P(th) Selection criteria: H, D, PHASE=L, BEILI2<2

L mode: TAUTH/Constr.regression versus B τ constr =0.022 I 0.89 B 0.09 P -0.72 n 0.42 M 0.22 R 1.88 ε -0.05 k 0.71 TAUTH/ τ constr Very weak magnetic field dependence in the scaling; no systematic trend. Bohm ρ* dependence. Result very similar to ITERL96P(th) B (T)

OHMIC Section Originally the OH section was composed only reference data for the additionally heated phase. Now OH data in L mode DB are the largest subset (6208 data over 8706). extended contributions: ALCC, ASDEX,CMOD,FT, FTU, JET, JT60 no data: D3D,DIII,JFT2M,PBXM,TFTR PDX,RTP,START,T10,TDEV,TEXTOR,TSUPRA few data: START: old data (higher values reported e.g. Varenna TTF 2000) TEXTOR: strange LOC data TSUPRA: SOC data? t 0.25 s (0.35 s reported in literature) PDX,RTP,T10,TDEV: SOC data? Some relevant quantities for OH confinement analysis are missing: ZEFF,TEV,TE0 (ALCC,CMOD), QEDGE(START,JT60)

OH: SOC regression A regression of the data in the Saturated OH Confinement regime (H,D, no pellet) has been performed: QEDGE has been defined for START (low aspect ratio formula) and JT60 (usual formula) SOC data selection 2 criteria: (1) critical density between LOC/SOC from Shimomura scaling : n 19 > 6.5 M 0.5 B/qR (2) τ neoa =0.007aR 2 k n 19 q >MIN defined ad-hoc for each tokamak NOH N (1) N (2) MIN ALCC 980 349 190 0.060 ASDEX 402 130 320 0.060 CMOD 385 213 167 0.080 FT 273 34 121 0.040 FTU 270 88 179 0.070 JET 1530 756 1037 0.700 JT60 189 119 125 0.500 PDX 11 9 4 0.040 RTP 8 1 START 21 18 6 0.003 T10 8 TDEV 3 TEXTOR 99 21 11 0.120 TSUPRA 41 6 8 0.300

SOC Regression (1) MEFF RGEO eps KAPPA nel19 bt ipma RMSE ITER Freefit (s) (1) 0.028 0.28 2.07 0.44 0.98 0.07 0.41 0.05 0.1841 4.23 (1) 0.028 0.31 2.05 0.47 1.02 0.51 0.1855 3.76 (2) 0.026 0.26 2.19 0.44 1.10 0.12 0.35-0.04 0.1759 4.01 (2) 0.028 0.26 2.01 0.33 1.04 0.41 0.1778 3.44 Constrained (1) 0.031 0.276 2.02 0.649 1.03 0.616 0.1964 3.76 (2) 0.029 0.182 1.96 0.474 1.14 0.57 0.2000 3.54 0.030 0.2 2 0.5 1 0.6 3.77 ITER-FEAT 2 6.2 0.32 1.85 6 5.3 15 τ SOC =0.03 B 0.6 R 2 ε 0.5 M 0.2 k τ SOC =0.09 B 0.6 R 2 ε τ SOC =0.05 B R 2 ε M 0.5 k 0.5 ZUO, EPS1995,TORE SUPRA NeoAlcator at n 19 =6.5 M 0.5 B/qR (ITER Physics Basis)

SOC Regression (2) τ SOC =0.03 B 0.6 R 2 ε 0.5 M 0.2 k τ SOC =0.05 B R 2 ε M 0.5 k 0.5 NeoAlcator at n 19 =6.5 M 0.5 B/qR [SOC data selected by the criteria τ neoa =0.007aR 2 k n 19 q >MIN(TOK)]

SOC Regression (3): B dependence TAUTH/τ SOC TAUTH/τSOC τ SOC =0.03 B 0.6 R 2 ε 0.5 M 0.2 k B freefit τ SOC =0.028 B 0.41 R 2.01 ε 0.33 M 0.26 k 1.04 A weak trend with B is observed with the constrained fit [SOC data selected by the criteria τ neoa =0.007aR 2 k n 19 q >MIN(TOK)] B

Pellet injection in OH plasma: ALCC, FTU FTU TAUTH NeoAlc TAUTH/τ SOC ALCC TAUTH NeoAlc B Energy confinement time can increase up to a factor 2 compared to SOC values with pellet injection

Conclusions L mode DB version 2.7 is in a better shape compared to the last meeting in Frascati, Oct.2000 L mode data regression confirms the results summarized by scaling ITERL96p(th) A scaling for saturated ohmic confinement has been obtained.