SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS FOR PLANAR TEXTURES IN SUPERFLUID 3 He

Similar documents
5 Topological defects and textures in ordered media

Physical Dynamics (PHY-304)

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

Physical Dynamics (SPA5304) Lecture Plan 2018

Geometric phases and spin-orbit effects

= 0. = q i., q i = E

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 25 Mar 2016

Representations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials

Physics 106b: Lecture 7 25 January, 2018

Transcendental cases in stability problem. Hamiltonian systems

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Physics 106a, Caltech 4 December, Lecture 18: Examples on Rigid Body Dynamics. Rotating rectangle. Heavy symmetric top

Hamiltonian aspects of fluid dynamics

II. DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Washington Mio CENTER FOR APPLIED VISION AND IMAGING SCIENCES

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 6 Nov 2015

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Lecture 41: Highlights

One can specify a model of 2d gravity by requiring that the eld q(x) satises some dynamical equation. The Liouville eld equation [3] ) q(

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Qualifying Exam. Aug Part II. Please use blank paper for your work do not write on problems sheets!

Methods in Computer Vision: Introduction to Matrix Lie Groups

11.D.2. Collision Operators

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 28 Aug 2017

Variation Principle in Mechanics

Symmetries in Semiclassical Mechanics

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

Contributions to the general theory of transformations

Semiclassical spin coherent state method in the weak spin-orbit coupling limit

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 22 Jul 1994

Math 302 Outcome Statements Winter 2013

13. Rigid Body Dynamics II

Vectors. January 13, 2013

Classical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime

Sophus Lie s Approach to Differential Equations

Spin Superfluidity and Graphene in a Strong Magnetic Field

Mechanics Physics 151

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

On Spatial Involute Gearing

An introduction to Birkhoff normal form

Semester University of Sheffield. School of Mathematics and Statistics

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

A Numerical Criterion for Lower bounds on K-energy maps of Algebraic manifolds

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid

Some Collision solutions of the rectilinear periodically forced Kepler problem

The Superfluid Phase s of Helium 3

Wigner s Little Groups

From the definition of a surface, each point has a neighbourhood U and a homeomorphism. U : ϕ U(U U ) ϕ U (U U )

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

Introduction to Integrability

Notes on Group Theory Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Linear Representations

Cocycles and stream functions in quasigeostrophic motion

Exchange statistics. Basic concepts. University of Oxford April, Jon Magne Leinaas Department of Physics University of Oslo

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

MAGNETIC BLOCH FUNCTIONS AND VECTOR BUNDLES. TYPICAL DISPERSION LAWS AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

Hamiltonian Dynamics from Lie Poisson Brackets

On Spatial Involute Gearing

Dynamical Systems & Lyapunov Stability

Changing coordinates to adapt to a map of constant rank

The Equilateral Pentagon at Zero Angular Momentum: Maximal Rotation Through Optimal Deformation

Appendix: SU(2) spin angular momentum and single spin dynamics

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

CP1 REVISION LECTURE 3 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL MECHANICS. Prof. N. Harnew University of Oxford TT 2017

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

GLOBAL, GEOMETRICAL COORDINATES ON FALBEL S CROSS-RATIO VARIETY

The Goryachev-Chaplygin Top and the Toda Lattice

Classical Mechanics III (8.09) Fall 2014 Assignment 3

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

Superintegrability in a non-conformally-at space

Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

Duality between constraints and gauge conditions

On the Torus Quantization of Two Anyons with Coulomb Interaction in a Magnetic Field

Seminar Geometrical aspects of theoretical mechanics

Hamiltonian Dynamics

Classical Oscilators in General Relativity

Phase Synchronization

Integrodifferential Hyperbolic Equations and its Application for 2-D Rotational Fluid Flows

3 HW Unitary group. 3.2 Symplectic Group. ] GL (n, C) to be unitary:

Use conserved quantities to reduce number of variables and the equation of motion (EOM)

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Continuous Symmetries and Conservation Laws. Noether s Theorem

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations

Kinematics. Chapter Multi-Body Systems

AMADEU DELSHAMS AND RAFAEL RAMíREZ-ROS

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

1 Hamiltonian formalism

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 8 Mar 1995

Lecture 10. Central potential

The Kepler Problem and the Isotropic Harmonic Oscillator. M. K. Fung

Transcription:

SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS FOR PLANAR TEXTURES IN SUPERFLUID 3 He V. L. GOLO, M. I. MONASTYRSKY, AND S. P. NOVIKOV Abstract. The Ginzburg Landau equations for planar textures of superfluid 3 He are proved to be equivalent to a completely integrable Hamiltonian system. General solutions to these equations are obtained by means of hyperelliptic integrals. 1. Introduction Superfluid 3 He in the state of the p-pairing can be described in terms of a complex 3 3 matrix field A pi (the order parameter), which minimizes the Ginzburg-Landau free energy, [1, 3, 5], F = d 3 x[f grad + F b + F h + F d ]; (1) F grad = γ 1 K A pi K A pi + γ 2 K A pi i A pk + γ 3 K A pk i A pi ; F b = α Tr(A + A) + β 1 Tr(AA t ) 2 + β 2 [Tr(A + A)] 2 + β 3 Tr[(A A t )(AA t ) ] + β 4 Tr[(A + A) 2 ] + β 5 Tr[(A + A)(A + A) ]; F d is the dipole energy density, F h is the magnetic energy density. For a uniform spacial configuration of the order parameter the F grad terms are absent. Then the minimization of F b gives values of the order parameter A pi for the familiar A and B phases, which constitute smooth manifolds M A and M B. In these two cases the order parameter is of the form: (I) for the A phase A pi = d p ( i + 1 i ), d 2 = 1, ( i) 2 = ( i ) 2 = 1 = const, i i = 0 M A = S 2 SO(3)/Z 2 (II) for the B phase A pi = 3 R 1/2 pi e iϕ, = const M B = SO(3) U(1) where R pi is a rotation matrix. The density F b is invariant under the transformations (2) A R 1 1 AR 2e iϕ Date: Received March 10, 1979. Communicated by J. Sinai. 1

2 V. L. GOLO, M. I. MONASTYRSKY, AND S. P. NOVIKOV where R 1, R 2 are rotation matrices. Transformations (2) constitute the symmetry group G = SO(3) SO(3) U(1). It should be noted that the order parameter for superfluid phases of 3 He takes its values in homogeneous spaces of the group G. For space dependent states, A pi = A pi (x), we have F grad 0. Then in the London (or hydrodynamic) limit, [3], we assume that the order parameter takes its values in the manifold of a superfluid phase, which lies in the space of complex 3 3-matrices, and the space dependence of the order parameter is determined by the minimization of free energy density (1) under appropriate boundary conditions. This situation is similar to the problem of chiral fields which take values in a homogeneous space M = G/H of the group G and generate a metric on M by the gradient terms of the Lagrangian. But it should be noticed that the gradient terms appearing in the theory of superfluid 3 He differ from the gradient terms of chiral theory in that they do not generate, in general, the standard-invariant metric on the manifold of the order parameter, while they do in chiral theory. In this paper we assume that the order parameter depends only on a space variable z, i.e. we consider planar textures, which describe reasonably well superfluid 3 He confined between two parallel plates devided by a narrow gap [7]. We have found that for planar textures in the A phase of superfluid 3 He there exists a mechanical analogy with a top that substantially differs from the top of classical mechanics in having moments of inertia which can change. Until now there has been only the analogy with the top of classical rigid body, which was derived for the needs of NMR [19]. Using the SO(3) SO(3) U(1)-symmetry of superfluid 3 He we have obtained general solutions to the GL equations for the order parameter by means of hyperelliptic integrals. These solutions fulfill only the necessary conditions of the minimization problem and it is still necessary to select the true minima among them. 2. Equations for the A phase We shall consider separately two cases: (i) L L d and (ii) L L d, where L, L d are the characteristic and dipole lengths respectively. (i) L L d In this case we may cancel out the dipole energy and take the order parameter in the most general form (5) A = e iϕ R 1 1 A 0R 2, A 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0. 1 i 0 We note that any value of the order parameter A for the A phase may be written in the form A = R1 1 A 0R 2 since we have the formula (6) e iϕ A 0 = R 1 ϕ A 0 R ϕ, R ϕ = cos ϕ sin ϕ 0 sin φ cos ϕ 0 0 0 1 Following papers [8], [9], we shall introduce the velocities (7) v = i z R 1 1 R 1 ; w = R 1 2 i z R 2.

SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS... 3 They take their values in the Lie algebra of the group SO(3) and we may write the equations v = v a f a, w = w a f a where f a, a = 1, 2, 3 are the generators of SO(3) having matrix elements (f a ) bc = iε abc. With the help of v, w and their coordinates v a, w a we may write down the density of the free energy given by Eq. (1) in the form (8) F grad = I ab (A)w a w b + χ ab (A)v a v b, I ab (A) = γ 1 (f a A + Af b ) ii + (γ 2 + γ 3 )(f a A + Af b ) 33, χ ab (A) = γ 1 (A + f a f b A) ii + (γ 2 + γ 3 )(A + f a f b A) 33, The velocities v, w are defined by Eq. (7) in the same way as the angular velocities of a three-dimensional rigid body. The matrices I ab and χ ab change for different values of A as is clearly seen from their explicit form (8 ) I ab = χ ab (A) = 2 (2γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) 3 2 )(δ ab d a d b ) γ 1 3 2 +(γ 1 +γ 2 +γ 3 ) 2 (γ 1 +γ 2 +γ 3 ) 1 2 γ 1 1 3 (γ 1 +γ 2 +γ 3 ) 1 2 γ 1 3 2 +(γ 1 +γ 2 +γ 3 ) 1 2 γ 1 2 3. γ 1 1 3 γ 1 2 3 γ 1 ( 2 2 + 3 2 ) Here i, d p ; i, p = 1, 2, 3 are the familiar complex and real vectors for the order parameter A pi. It is convenient to define a scalar product of two complex 3 3-matrices by the formula (9) X Y = γ 1 (X + Y ) ii + (γ 2 + γ 3 )(X + Y ) 33. Then we have (10) I ab (A) = Af a Af b, χ ab (A) = f a A f b A. Now let us notice that under variations of the rotation matrices of the order parameter R 1,2 R 1,2 (1 + iθ(1, 2) +... ) the velocities v a, w a and the order parameter are transformed as follows v a v a + z ϑ (1) a + ε abc v b ϑ (1) c +... w a w a z ϑ (2) a + ε abc w b ϑ (2) c +... A A iϑ (1) a f a A + iϑ (2) a Af a +.... Hence we may obtain the equations of motion (or the equations for texture) in the form () (12) M a spin (i f a f b A f c A + c.c.)v b v c = 0 M a orb (i Af a f b Af c + c.c.)w b w c = 0 M a spin = F grad / v a ; M a orb = F grad / w a, M a spin = z M a spin ε abc v b M c spin, M a orb = z M a orb + ε abc w b M c orb. They are similar to the Euler equations for a top. Since there are no cross terms with respect to v a, w a in Eqs. ( 12) we may say that we have two 3-dimensional tops, which nonetheless do interact with each other as follows from Eq. (8 ). The second terms in Eqs. ( 12) have appeared since our tops have changing inertia :

4 V. L. GOLO, M. I. MONASTYRSKY, AND S. P. NOVIKOV coefficients. We may transform Eqs. ( 12) into a Hamiltonian form by means of Poisson brackets as follows H = F grad ; z Mspin(orb) a = {M spin(orb) a ; H}; {M a spin; M b spin} = ε abc M c spin; {A pi ; A qj } = 0; {M a orb; M b orb} = ε abc M c orb; {M a orb; M b spin} = 0; {M spin ; A} = if a A; {M a orb} = iaf a We have six conserved quantities or integrals for our system: (1) The spin currents jspin a, a = 1, 2, 3 generated by the rotations in the spin indices (since the dipole energy is cancelled out); (2) The momentum along the axis OZ, i.e. the Hamiltonian H of the system; (3) The superfluid current j m = A Af a w a + c.c. generated by the gauge transformation A e iϕ A, (4) Morb 3, generated by the rotation in the orbital indices round the axis OZ cos ψ sin ψ 0 A AR ψ ; ψ = sin ψ cos ψ 0 0 0 1 We notice that the components jspin a of spin current coincide with the spin momenta Mspin a, a = 1, 2, 3. It is easy to see that the integrals H = F grad, j m, M 3 orb, M 3 spin, (M a spin) 2 are in involution, i.e. the Poisson brackets among any two of them are zero. Hence our system is completely integrable. But it should be noticed that the actual integration requires additional consideration of the symmetry of the order parameter, (cf. below). It is easy to incorporate the magnetic field in Eqs. ( 12), but since the magnetic energy is represented by the term F H = g H H p A pi 2 We lose two spin current integrals and our system is no longer completely integrable. (ii) L L d In this case we shall use only the superfluid velocity w = R 1 i z R. Now the function F grad takes the form (13) F grad = I ab (A)w a w b, I ab = [A; f a ] [A; f b ] where means scalar product (9). First we suppose that the magnetic field is absent. Then by the considerations similar to those of the last subsection we obtain the Euler equations in the form (14) M a + (i [A; f b ] [[A; f a ]f c ] i [[A; f a ]f b ] [A; f c ] )w b w c = 0, M a = F grad / w a, M a = z M a + ε abc w b M c.

SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS... 5 The magnetic field can be incorporated in the free energy density through the additional term F H = g H H pa pi 2 which generates the right hand side in Eq. (13). We consider only the case of the magnetic field being parallel to the axis OZ. Then the arguments of the previous subsection go through for obvious reasons and we have three integrals in involution H = F grad + F H, j m, M 3 and our system is completely integrable. (iii) Now we shall obtain explicit formulae for the solutions by symmetry considerations with the Euler angles. We consider separately the two cases: (i) L L d and (ii) L L d. (i) L L d In this case the minimization of the dipole energy density reduces the order parameter to the form A = R 1 A 0 R, A 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0. 1 i 0 The free energy density is invariant under the transformation of the order parameter (15) A e iϕ R 1 ψ AR ψ where R ψ is a rotation round the OZ-axis by an angle ψ. We notice that e iϕ R 1 ψ AR ψ = (Rϕ 1 RR ψ ) 1 A(Rϕ 1 RR ψ ). The whole point about the symmetry of the order parameter of the A-phase is that transformations (14) generate two commuting one-dimensional subgroups of SO(3), which act on SO(3) as follows: R R 1 ϕ RR ψ. From the Euler form of a rotation matrix R = R (z) ϕ R (z) ϑ R(z) ψ. where R ϕ (z), R (z) ψ are rotations round the axis OZ by the angles ϕ, ψ and R(x) ϑ is a rotation round the axis OX by the angle ϑ, we infer that the angles ϕ, ψ can be cancelled out by transformations (14) with a suitable choice of ϕ, ψ. Therefore, the coefficients I ab of the free energy density depend only on the angle ϑ. 1 Hence we obtain (16) F grad = I ϑ2 + I 22 sin 2 ϑ ψ 2 + I 33 ( ψ cos θ + ϕ) 2 2I 23 sin ϑ( ψ cos ϑ + ϕ) ψ; I = 2 (3γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 ); I 12 = I 13 = I 21 = I 31 = 0 I 22 = 2 (2γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 + γ 1 cos 2 ϑ + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) sin 2 ϑ cos 2 ϑ); I 23 = 2 (γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) sin 2 ϑ) sin ϑ cos ϑ; 1 This result was also obtained in papers [10, ].

6 V. L. GOLO, M. I. MONASTYRSKY, AND S. P. NOVIKOV Here the dot denotes the derivative z. Using the cyclic variables ϕ, ψ we may put (15) in the form (17) F grad = I ϑ2 + 1 4 sin 2 ϑ I(ϑ) {j m I 33 2j m M 3 (I 33 cos ϑ I 22 sin ϑ) + M 2 3 (I 33 cos 2 ϑ 2I 23 sin ϑ cos ϑ + I 22 sin 2 ϑ)} I(ϑ) = I 22 I 33 I 2 23 Since F grad is an integral of motion we may write Eq. (16) in the form (18) I ϑ 2 + ϕ(ϑ) 4 sin 2 ϑ I(ϑ) = E, where ϕ(ϑ) is the function in the brackets of Eq. (16). We may incorporate the magnetic energy in the free energy density if the magnetic field is directed along the axis OZ, since in this case the symmetry considerations of Eqs. (12 14) go through. We have (19) I ϑ 2 + ϕ(ϑ) 4 sin 2 ϑ I(ϑ) + 2g HH 2 2 cos 2 ϑ = E. We may write solutions to Eq. (18) as a hyperelliptic integral (20) z = ±I 1/2 2 sin ϑ I 1/2 dϑ (4 sin 2 ϑ I(ϑ)(E 2g H H 2 2 cos 2 ϑ) ϕ(ϑ)) 1/2 = I 1/2 I(t) dt ({4(1 t 2 )(E 2g H H 2 2 t 2 )I(t) ϕ(t)} I(t)) 1/2 = 2I 1/2 I(t)dt, t = cos ϑ, (P 12 (t)) 1/2 where I(t) and ϕ(t) are polynomials of the 4-th and 6-th order, respectively. We may write solutions for ϕ, ψ in a similar form [ ] ϕ = I 1/2 K5 (t) 1 t (21) 2 + K dt 4(t) (P 12 (t)), 1/2 ψ = ±I 1/2 K5 (t) 1 t 2 dt (P 12 (t)) 1/2 where t = cos ϑ, P 12 (t) is the polynomial under the radical in Eq. (19); K 4 (t), K 5 (t), K5 (t) are polynomials in t of degree 4 and 5. (ii) L L d This case can be treated along the same lines as the last one. We shall consider textures in the absence of the magnetic field. We may eliminate all the Euler angles except ϑ and obtain the coefficients I ab, X ab in the form X ab = 2 {γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) sin 2 ϑ}(δ ab δ a3 δ b3 ); I = γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) cos 2 ϑ; I 23 = γ 1 sin ϑ cos ϑ; I 12 = I 21 = 0; I 22 = γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 + γ 1 sin 2 ϑ; I 33 = γ 1 + γ 1 cos 2 ϑ; I 32 = I 23 = 0. We have the conserved quantities ϕ spin, ψ spin, M 2 spin = const.

SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS... 7 With their help we can put the free energy density in the form F = I 12 ϑ2 + I 22 sin 2 ϑ ψ 2 2I 23 sin ϑ ψ( ψ cos ϑ + ϕ) + I 33 ( ψ cos ϑ + ϕ) 2 + M 2 spin 4 2 [γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 ) sin 2 ϑ] 1. We notice that ϕ, ψ are cyclic variables and we can derive an equation for ϑ. Here we shall write down only the equations for the simplest case of M 3 = 0, M spin = 0. We have (γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)i(u)du z = ± (u(γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)p 3 (u)), 1/2 ψ = j mγ 1 2 ϕ = ± j mγ 1 2 where u = cos 2 ϑ, and γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u du ((γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)p 3 (u)) 1/2 1 u, γ1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u du 1 u (u(γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)p 3 (u)) 1/2 (γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)du (u(γ 1 + (γ 2 + γ 3 )u)p 3 (u)), 1/2 j m 2γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 2 I(u) = 2 (γ 1 (2γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 ) + γ 1 (γ 2 + γ 3 )u) P 3 (u) = I(u)[4E(1 u)i(u) ϕ(u)] ϕ(u) = (2γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 ) 2 j m (γ 2 + γ 3 ) 2 j m u. Appendix A. Equations for the B Phase We assume that the characteristic length of a texture is much less than the dipole length L d. Then the order parameter is of the form A = 3 Re iϕ where R is a rotation matrix and is a complex number. Again we shall use the velocities w = R 1 i z R, v = z ϕ. Then it is easy to see that the gradient part of the free energy density can be written as F = I 2 (w2 1 + w 2 2) + J 2 w2 3 + m 2 v2, (22) J = 2 2 3 2γ 1 ; I = 2 3 2 (2γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 ), m = 2 3 2 (3γ 1 + γ 2 + γ 3 ). We notice that Eq. (21) has the form of a Lagrangian for symmetric top with a mass m, inertia-coefficients I, J. The velocities w = (w 1, w 2, w 3 ), v mean the velocity of the center mass and the angular velocity of the top. Now the integration technique for symmetric top must work for planar textures in the B phase. Here we want to notice an interesting example. Let us take into account the dipole energy contribution to the free-energy F d = g d (cos ϑ + 2 cos 2 ϑ),

8 V. L. GOLO, M. I. MONASTYRSKY, AND S. P. NOVIKOV where ϑ is a rotation angle of the order parameter. If we assume that the rotation axis is perpendicular to the plates confining the superfluid throughout the gap, then there exists a solution, first found by Maki, for which the Euler equations reduce to only one equation for ϑ. It has the form J ϑ + g d sin ϑ(1 + 4 cos ϑ) = 0 and can be solved by means of the elliptic functions. Appendix B. Singularities of the Euler Angles We shall demonstrate that for the rotation group the Euler angles ϕ, ψ, ϑ constitute a system of coordinates having a singularity at ϑ = 0, π. Since the Euler angles change within range 0 ϕ, ψ 2π, 0 ϑ π we may say using the geometrical language that they form a product Π of a twodimensional torus and a segement Π = S 1 ϕ S 1 ψ I ϑ the angles ϕ, ψ taking values in the circles and the angle ϑ in the segment I ϑ. The formulae, which express a rotation matrix by the Euler angles, give a map (23) Π = S 1 ϕ S 1 ψ I ϑ SO(3), R = R(ϕ, ψ, ϑ) of the space Π onto the rotation group. We notice that Π is a manifold with the boundary consisting of two tori S 1 ϕ S 1 ψ, ϑ = 0, π. Map (22) has points of degeneracy at the boundary. To see this we may consider the formulae for the angular velocity ϕ sin ϑ sin ψ 0 cos ψ ωc ψ ; C = sin ϑ cos ψ 0 sin ψ. ϑ cos ϑ 1 0 We may say that Eq. (23) gives the differential of smooth map (22) and ϕ, ψ, ϑ and ω 1, ω 2, ω 3 are coordinates of tangent vectors on Π and SO(3) respectively. The matrix C in Eq. (23) is degenerate of rank 2 at ϑ = 0, π i.e. at the boundary which is mapped into the matrices cos α sin α 0 cos β sin β 0 R(ϕ, ψ, ϑ = 0) = sin α cos α 0 ; R(ϕ, ψ, ϑ = π) = sin β cos β 0, 0 0 1 0 0 1 here α(ϕ, ψ) = ϕ + ψ, β(ϕ, ψ) = ϕ ψ. To put this in geometrical terms we may say that the tori of the boundary are contracted by map (22) into circles. On the other hand we have no contraction or singular points for 0 < ϑ < π. Hence the Euler angles provide a means to obtain the manifold SO(3) as follows: (1) two pairs (ϕ, ψ) and (ϕ + 2πn, ψ + 2πn), n is an integer, are equivalent; (2) ϑ changes within the segment 0 ϑ π;

SOLUTIONS TO THE GINZBURG LANDAU EQUATIONS... 9 (3) if ϑ = 0 the pairs (ϕ, ψ) and (ϕ, ψ ) determine the same point of SO(3) if ϕ + ψ = ϕ + ψ if ϑ = π the pairs (ϕ, ψ) and (ϕ, ψ ) determine the same point of SO(3) if ϕ ψ = ϕ ψ. Acknowledgments. We are thankful to H. Kleinert and K. Maki for sending the preprints of their papers. References [1] Mermin, N.D., Stare, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 35 38 (1973) [2] Golo, V.L., Monastyrsky, M.I.: Lett. Math. Phys. 2, 373 378 (1978) [3] Leggett, A.J.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 414 (1975) [4] Golo, V.L., Monastyrsky, M.I.: Preprint ITEP-173 (1976); Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 28, 75 89 (1978) [5] Ambegaokar, V., degennes, P.G., Reiner, D.: Phys. Rev. A9, 2676 2685 (1976) [6] Maki, K.: Physica 90 B, 84 93 (1977) [7] Fetter, A.: Phys. Rev. 15B, 1350 1356 (1977) [8] Slavnov, A.A., Faddeev, L.D.: TMF 8, 297 307 (1971) [9] Golo, V.L., Monastyrsky, M.I.: Lett. Math. Phys. 2, 379 383 (1978) [10] Kleinert, H., Lin-Liu, Y.R.: Preprint USC, 1978 [] Maki, K., Kumar, P.: Phys. Rev. 16B, 4805 4813 (1977) [12] Fomin, I.: J. Low Temp. Phys. 31, 509 526 (1978) Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, USSR