KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS

Similar documents
KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS

CLASS FIELD THEORY NOTES

Modular forms and the Hilbert class field

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

ERIC LARSON AND LARRY ROLEN

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

Height pairings on Hilbert modular varieties: quartic CM points

A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO HILBERT MODULAR SURFACES AND HIRZEBRUCH-ZAGIER DIVISORS

1, for s = σ + it where σ, t R and σ > 1

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM SOLUTIONS October 20, 2011

CHARACTERIZING INTEGERS AMONG RATIONAL NUMBERS WITH A UNIVERSAL-EXISTENTIAL FORMULA

CONSTRUCTING SUPERSINGULAR ELLIPTIC CURVES. Reinier Bröker

THE SPLITTING FIELD OF X 3 7 OVER Q

Galois Representations

Graduate Preliminary Examination

c ij x i x j c ij x i y j

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory How small can disc(k) be for a number field K of degree n = r 1 + 2r 2?

Don Zagier s work on singular moduli

TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

THE ARITHMETIC OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF HALF INTEGRAL WEIGHT EISENSTEIN SERIES. H(1, n)q n =

Applications of Complex Multiplication of Elliptic Curves

TAMAGAWA NUMBERS OF ELLIPTIC CURVES WITH C 13 TORSION OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

AN ARITHMETIC FORMULA FOR THE PARTITION FUNCTION

Thus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally

SPECIAL VALUES OF j-function WHICH ARE ALGEBRAIC

CM-Fields with Cyclic Ideal Class Groups of 2-Power Orders

A new family of character combinations of Hurwitz zeta functions that vanish to second order

Maximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields

PARITY OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF KLEIN S j-function

RIGHT-LEFT SYMMETRY OF RIGHT NONSINGULAR RIGHT MAX-MIN CS PRIME RINGS

Twisted L-Functions and Complex Multiplication

THE ASYMPTOTIC DISTRIBUTION OF ANDREWS SMALLEST PARTS FUNCTION

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

On the distribution of rational points on certain Kummer surfaces

Hermitian modular forms congruent to 1 modulo p.

The Kronecker-Weber Theorem

ON 3-CLASS GROUPS OF CERTAIN PURE CUBIC FIELDS. Frank Gerth III

Generation of class fields by using the Weber function arxiv: v3 [math.nt] 12 Oct 2014

Transcendence in Positive Characteristic

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

Dirichlet Series Associated with Cubic and Quartic Fields

Local root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields

Chapter 8. P-adic numbers. 8.1 Absolute values

AN ARITHMETIC FORMULA FOR THE PARTITION FUNCTION

ON THE SEMIPRIMITIVITY OF CYCLIC CODES

18 The analytic class number formula

Independence of Heegner Points Joseph H. Silverman (Joint work with Michael Rosen)

DONG QUAN NGOC NGUYEN

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 15 Mar 2012

(τ) = q (1 q n ) 24. E 4 (τ) = q q q 3 + = (1 q) 240 (1 q 2 ) (1 q 3 ) (1.1)

CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS CARL ERICKSON

THE ARITHMETIC OF BORCHERDS EXPONENTS. Jan H. Bruinier and Ken Ono

Constructing Class invariants

THE CHOWLA-SELBERG FORMULA FOR CM ABELIAN SURFACES

On the generation of the coefficient field of a newform by a single Hecke eigenvalue

THE UNIT GROUP OF A REAL QUADRATIC FIELD

Ideal class groups of cyclotomic number fields I

Projects on elliptic curves and modular forms

Explicit Methods in Algebraic Number Theory

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

x mv = 1, v v M K IxI v = 1,

Twists of elliptic curves of rank at least four

FIELD THEORY. Contents

KUMMER S CRITERION ON CLASS NUMBERS OF CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS

IDEAL CLASS GROUPS OF CYCLOTOMIC NUMBER FIELDS I

On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms

AN APPLICATION OF THE p-adic ANALYTIC CLASS NUMBER FORMULA

Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves

ON TAMELY RAMIFIED IWASAWA MODULES FOR THE CYCLOTOMIC p -EXTENSION OF ABELIAN FIELDS

FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF VECTOR-VALUED MODULAR FORMS OF DIMENSION 2

A COMPUTATION OF MINIMAL POLYNOMIALS OF SPECIAL VALUES OF SIEGEL MODULAR FUNCTIONS

THE GENERALIZED ARTIN CONJECTURE AND ARITHMETIC ORBIFOLDS

Classical modular group

Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields

Arithmetic properties of harmonic weak Maass forms for some small half integral weights

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

ADRIAN BARQUERO-SANCHEZ AND RIAD MASRI

Logarithm and Dilogarithm

Addition sequences and numerical evaluation of modular forms

GENERIC ABELIAN VARIETIES WITH REAL MULTIPLICATION ARE NOT JACOBIANS

Introduction to modular forms Perspectives in Mathematical Science IV (Part II) Nagoya University (Fall 2018)

Abstract. Gauss s hypergeometric function gives a modular parameterization of period integrals of elliptic curves in Legendre normal form

THE DIRICHLET CLASS NUMBER FORMULA FOR IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS

Homework 4 Solutions

LINEAR FORMS IN LOGARITHMS

Some algebraic number theory and the reciprocity map

AVERAGE RECIPROCALS OF THE ORDER OF a MODULO n

20 The modular equation

Class Field Theory. Anna Haensch. Spring 2012

Part II. Number Theory. Year

QUADRATIC CONGRUENCES FOR COHEN - EISENSTEIN SERIES.

An Additive Characterization of Fibers of Characters on F p

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative

CONSTRUCTION OF THE HILBERT CLASS FIELD OF SOME IMAGINARY QUADRATIC FIELDS. Jangheon Oh

20 The modular equation

A Note on the Transcendence of Zeros of a Certain Family of Weakly Holomorphic Forms

Transcription:

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS RIAD MASRI Abstract. We generalize Kronecker s solution of Pell s equation to CM fields K whose Galois group over Q is an elementary abelian 2-group. This is an identity which relates CM values of a certain Hilbert modular function to products of logarithms of fundamental units. When K is imaginary quadratic, these CM values are algebraic numbers related to elliptic units in the Hilbert class field of K. Assuming Schanuel s conjecture, we show that when K has degree greater than 2 over Q these CM values are transcendental. 1. Introduction and statement of results The analytic construction of solutions of certain natural Diophantine equations is a problem of central importance in number theory. One of the most remarkable examples of this is Kronecker s solution of Pell s equation x 2 dy 2 = ±1. (1.1) The fundamental unit ε d in the real quadratic field Q( d) satisfies (1.1). Kronecker expressed ε d in terms of values of the Dedekind eta function η(z) at CM points on the modular curve SL 2 (Z)\H (see the discussion below, and in particular, equation (1.5)). In this paper we will generalize Kronecker s solution of Pell s equation to CM fields K whose Galois group over Q is an elementary abelian 2-group (see Theorem 1.3). This is an identity which relates values of a certain Hilbert modular function at CM points on a Hilbert modular variety to products of logarithms of fundamental units. When K is imaginary quadratic, these CM values are algebraic numbers which can be expressed as absolute values of Galois conjugates of elliptic units in the Hilbert class field of K (see [S, p. 103]). In contrast, when K has degree greater than 2 over Q we will show, assuming Schanuel s conjecture, that these CM values are transcendental (see Theorem 1.6). This result is related to interesting recent work of Murty and Murty [MM1, MM2] on transcendental values of class group L functions for imaginary quadratic fields. We begin by reviewing Kronecker s solution of Pell s equation. For a quadratic field Q( ) of discriminant, let χ be the Kronecker symbol, L(χ, s) be the Dirichlet L function, h( ) be the class number, ε be the fundamental unit, and w be the number of roots of unity. Let K = Q( D) be an imaginary quadratic field of discriminant D < 4 (so w D = 2). For an ideal class C of K, let τ a H be the CM point of discriminant D on the modular curve SL 2 (Z)\H corresponding to [a] = C 1 (here H is the complex upper half-plane). More precisely, if Q(X, Y ) = N(a)X 2 + bxy + cy 2 is the reduced, primitive, integral binary quadratic form of discriminant b 2 4N(a)c = D corresponding to the class 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11F41. Key words and phrases. CM point, Hilbert modular function, Pell s equation. 1

2 RIAD MASRI C 1, then τ a = b + D 2N(a) is the unique root in H of the dehomogenized form Q(X, 1) (here N(a) is the norm of a). Kronecker established the following limit formula for the constant term in the Laurent expansion of the partial Dedekind zeta function ζ K (s, C) at s = 1, lim s 1 [ ζ K (s, C) π 1 D s 1 ] = π D (2γ log D 2 log g(τ a )), (1.2) where γ is Euler s constant and g : H R + is the SL 2 (Z)-invariant function g(z) := (2/ D )Im(z) η(z) 2, where η(z) = e(z/24) (1 e(nz)), e(z) := e 2πiz n=1 is Dedekind s weight 1/2 modular form for SL 2 (Z). Let D = D 1 D 2 be a nontrivial factorization of D into coprime fundamental discriminants D 1 > 0 and D 2 < 0. Let χ be the genus character of K corresponding to the decomposition D = D 1 D 2 and let L K (χ, s) = χ(c)ζ K (s, C) be the L function of χ where CL(K) is the ideal class group of K. Kronecker established the factorization L K (χ, s) = L(χ D1, s)l(χ D2, s). (1.3) By orthogonality of group characters, one obtains from (1.2) the formula L K (χ, 1) = 2π χ(c) log F (τ a ). D On the other hand, by Dirichlet s class number formula for quadratic fields one has 2 log(ε )h( ), if > 0, L(χ, 1) = 2πh( ), if < 0. w (1.4) Equating both sides of Kronecker s factorization (1.3) at s = 1 yields the beautiful identity χ(c) log F (τ a ) = 2h(D 1)h(D 2 ) log(ε D1 ), w D2 or equivalently F (τ a ) χ(c) = ε 2h(D 1)h(D 2 )/w D2 D 1. (1.5)

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 3 The fundamental unit ε D1 satisfies Pell s equation x 2 D 1 y 2 = ±1, thus one has a solution of this equation in terms of the CM values F (τ a ). Recall that a CM field is a totally imaginary quadratic extension of a totally real number field. In order to generalize Kronecker s identity (1.5) to CM fields we proceed as follows. First, we evaluate the special value L K (χ, 1) where χ is a nontrivial class group character of a CM field K (see Theorem 1.1). To do this we establish a suitable version of the Kronecker limit formula for CM fields, which relates the constant term in the Laurent expansion at s = 1 of ζ K (s, C) to values of a Hilbert modular function at CM points on a Hilbert modular variety (see Theorem 4.1). Second, we identify the CM fields which possess a genus character χ whose L function L K (χ, s) factors as a product of quadratic Dirichlet L functions. These are the CM fields whose Galois group over Q is an elementary abelian 2-group. Given such a factorization, we can evaluate L K (χ, 1) using Dirichlet s class number formula for quadratic fields. By equating the two different evaluations of L K (χ, 1) we will generalize (1.5). Note that a limit formula for CM fields was established by Konno in [K]. See also the work of Asai [A], who calculated the constant term in the Laurent expansion at s = 1 of the realanalytic Eisenstein series associated to any number field of class number 1. Our approach to the limit formula for CM fields differs from [K]. In particular, we proceed via the Fourier expansion of the Hilbert modular Eisenstein series, which enables us to use periods of this Eisenstein series to explicitly determine the CM zero-cycles along which we evaluate the Hilbert modular function. In order to state our results we fix the following notation. Let F be a totally real number field of degree n over Q with embeddings σ 1,..., σ n and ring of integers O F. Let K be a CM extension of F with a CM type Φ, and let CM(K, Φ, O F ) = {z a H n : [a] CL(K)} be the zero-cycle of CM points on the Hilbert modular variety X F = SL 2 (O F )\H n (see Section 3). Let R K, w K and d K be the regulator, number of roots of unity, and absolute discriminant of K, respectively. In the following theorem we give a formula for the special value L K (χ, 1). Theorem 1.1. Let F be a totally real number field of degree n over Q with narrow class number 1. Let K be a CM extension of F with a CM type Φ. For each class C CL(K), let z a be the CM point in CM(K, Φ, O F ) corresponding to C 1. Then for each nontrivial class group character χ of K, L K (χ, 1) = 2n+1 π n R K w K dk χ(c) log G(z a ), where G : H n R + is the SL 2 (O F )-invariant function G(z) := ( 2 n d F / ) n d K Im(z i ) φ(z) 2, i=1 z = (z 1,..., z n ) H n and φ(z) is the positive, real-analytic function generalizing η(z) defined by (1.6).

4 RIAD MASRI Remark 1.2. The narrow class number 1 assumption in Theorem 1.1 can be removed by working adelically. We have worked classically throughout the paper to emphasize the parallels with Kronecker s original work. The function φ(z) in Theorem 1.1 is defined by where r F is the residue of ζ F (2s 1) at s = 1/2 and f(z) := exp ζ F (2) i=1 φ(z) := f(z) d F /2π n r F, (1.6) n y i + πn df ã O F ã=ab a O F b O F /O F e 2πiS(aby) N F/Q ((b)) where z = x + iy H n, OF is the dual lattice, O F is the unit group, n S(aby) = σ i (ab) y i, T (abx) = i=1 n σ i (ab)x i, i=1 e2πit (abx) and the prime means the sum is over nonzero elements. In Proposition 4.3 we will show that φ(z) transforms like 1 n 2 φ(mz) = (σ i (γ)z i + σ i (δ)) φ(z) i=1 ( ) α β for M = SL γ δ 2 (O F ). Our main result is the following theorem generalizing Kronecker s identity (1.5). Theorem 1.3. Let F be a totally real number field with narrow class number 1. Let K be a CM extension of F with Gal(K/Q) = (Z/2Z) r for some integer r 2, and let E be an unramified quadratic extension of K with Gal(E/Q) = (Z/2Z) r+1. Let χ be the genus character of K arising from the extension E/K. Let i for 1 i 2 r be the discriminants of the quadratic subfields Q( i ) of E which are not contained in K and define S R := { i : i > 0} and S I := { i : i < 0}. Then ( ) G(z a ) χ(c) α dk = exp 2 r log(ε i ), i=1 i R F i S R where α := w 2 r K i=1 h( i) Q. i S I w i In the following theorem we give an explicit example of Theorem 1.3 for CM biquadratic fields.,

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 5 Theorem 1.4. Let F = Q( p) where p 1 mod 4 is a prime such that F has narrow class number 1. Let D = D 1 D 2 < 0 be a composite fundamental discriminant with D 1 > 0 and D 2 < 0 fundamental discriminants. Let K = Q( D, pd) and E = Q( D 1, D 2, p). Let χ be the genus character of K arising from the extension E/K. Then where G(z a ) χ(c) = exp ( β d K log(ε D1 ) log(ε pd1 ) log(ε p ) β := w Kh(D 1 )h(d 2 )h(pd 1 )h(pd 2 ) pd 1 D 2 w D2 w pd2 Q. Kronecker s identity (1.5) implies that the product of CM values g(τ a ) χ(c) is an algebraic number. This product is also related to elliptic units in the Hilbert class field H of K = Q( D). Namely, using quotients of powers of η(τ a ) and the theory of complex multiplication, one can construct a sequence ζ l, l = 1,..., h(d) 1, of independent units in H (see [S, p. 103]). If σ k is the automorphism of H/K corresponding to the ideal class C k under the isomorphism one can show that where ζ (k) l g(τ ak ) g(τ ak a 1 l Gal(H/K) CL(K), ) = ζ(k) l 1/12h(D), k, l = 1,..., h(d) 1, := σ k (ζ l ). In particular, the quotients g(τ ak )/g(τ ak a 1 ) are algebraic. l More generally, let H K be the Hilbert class field of a CM field K as in Theorem 1.1 and let h K be the class number of K. In light of the preceding facts, it is natural to ask whether the products of CM values G(z a ) χ(c) are algebraic, and if so, whether they are related to analogs of elliptic units in H K. We will show, assuming Schanuel s conjecture, that these products are transcendental. Recall the following well-known conjecture of Schanuel from transcendental number theory (see e.g. [Wa, Conjecture 1.14]). Conjecture 1.5 (Schanuel). Given complex numbers x 1,..., x n that are linearly independent over Q, the field has transcendence degree at least n over Q. We will prove the following theorem. Q(x 1,..., x n, exp(x 1 ),..., exp(x n )) ),

6 RIAD MASRI Theorem 1.6. Let notation and assumptions be as in Theorem 1.3. Then assuming Schanuel s conjecture, the numbers G(z a ) χ(c) are transcendental. Theorem 1.6 indicates that one cannot in general expect the quotients G(z ak ) G(z ak a 1 ), k, l = 1,..., h K 1, l to be related to analogs of elliptic units in H K. For example, if we assume in Theorem 1.6 that K has class number 2, then Schanuel s conjecture implies that the quotients G(z a )/G(z OK ) are transcendental. Note that there are more than 150 CM biquadratic fields with class number 2 (see [BWW]). Organization. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we calculate the Laurent expansion at s = 1 of the Hilbert modular Eisenstein series. In Section 3 we review some facts regarding CM zero-cycles on Hilbert modular varieties. Finally, in Sections 4, 5, 6, and 7, we prove Theorems 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.6, respectively. Acknowledgments. I would like to thank Matt Papanikolas and Tonghai Yang for many helpful discussions, Kumar Murty for his interest in this work, and the referee for suggestions which improved the exposition. The author was supported in part by the NSF grant DMS- 1162535. 2. Laurent expansion of the Hilbert modular Eisenstein series Let F be a totally real number field with class number 1. Let F have degree n over Q with embeddings σ 1,..., σ n and let z = x + iy = (z 1,..., z n ) H n. Let O F be the ring of integers of F and SL 2 (O F ) be the Hilbert modular group. Then SL 2 (O F ) acts componentwise on H n by linear fractional transformations, Let Mz = (σ 1 (M)z 1,..., σ n (M)z n ), M SL 2 (O F ). N(y(z)) = n Im(z j ) = j=1 denote the product of the imaginary parts of the components of z H n. Define the realanalytic Hilbert modular Eisenstein series E(z, s) := N(y(Mz)) s, z H n, Re(s) > 1, where M Γ \SL 2 (O F ) Γ = n j=1 y j {( ) } SL 0 2 (O F ).

Furthermore, let KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 7 N(a + bz) = n (σ j (a) + σ j (b)z j ) j=1 for (a, b) O F O F and define the Eisenstein series E(z, s) := (a,b) O F O F /O F N(y(z)) s N(a + bz) 2s, z Hn, Re(s) > 1, where the sum is over a complete set of nonzero, nonassociated representatives of O F O F (recall that (a, b) and (a, b ) are associated if there exists a unit ɛ O F such that (a, b) = (ɛa, ɛb )). The two Eisenstein series are related by ã O F ã=ab a O F b O F /O F E(z, s) = ζ F (2s)E(z, s), (2.1) where ζ F (s) is the Dedekind zeta function of F. The Eisenstein series E(z, s) has the Fourier expansion [ ( )] n E(z, s) = N(y(z)) s ζ F (2s) + N(y(z))1 s πγ s 1 2 ζ F (2s 1) (2.2) df Γ(s) [ ] + 2n N(y(z)) 1 2 π s n df Γ(s) ( ) NF/Q ((a)) s 1 2 n e 2πiT (abx) K N F/Q ((b)) s 1 (2π σ j (ab) y j ) 2 =: A(s) + B(s) + C(s), where O F is the dual lattice, d F is the absolute discriminant, T (ax) = n j=1 σ j(a)x j is the trace, K s (v) is the usual K-Bessel function of order s, and A(s), B(s), C(s) are the three functions on the right hand side of (2.2), respectively. The Fourier expansion provides a meromorphic continuation of E(z, s) to C with a simple pole at s = 1. We now use this to compute the Laurent expansion at s = 1. The Laurent expansion of A(s) at s = 1 is Next, observe that A(s) = N(y(z))ζ F (2) + O(s 1). j=1 N(y(z)) 1 s = 1 log N(y(z)) (s 1) + O(s 1) 2, df df df and [ ( )] n πγ s 1 2 = π n 2nπ n log(2)(s 1) + O(s 1) 2, Γ(s) ζ F (2s 1) = r F 2(s 1) + A F + O(s 1).

8 RIAD MASRI After a calculation, we find that the Laurent expansion of B(s) at s = 1 is Using we compute where B(s) = πn r F 2 d F 1 (s 1) + πn df A F πn r F 2 d F [log N(y(z)) + 2n log(2)] + O(s 1). n j=1 K 1/2 (v) = π/2ve v K 1/2 (2π σ j (ab) y j ) = N(y(z)) 1/2 2 n N F/Q ((ab)) 1/2 e 2πS(aby), S(aby) = n σ j (ab) y j. j=1 Thus the Laurent expansion of C(s) at s = 1 is C(s) = πn df ã O F ã=ab a O F b O F /O F e 2πiS(aby) N F/Q ((b)) e2πit (abx) + O(s 1). Putting things together, we find that the Laurent expansion of E(z, s) at s = 1 is where the residue and E 0 (z) = E(z, s) = E 1 s 1 + E 0(z) + O(s 1), (2.3) E 1 = πn r F 2 d F, πn df A F E 1 2n log(2) + log ( N(y(z)) E 1 f(z) ), (2.4) where log f(z) = N(y(z))ζ F (2) + πn df ã O F ã=ab a O F e 2πiS(aby) N F/Q ((b)) e2πit (abx). b O F /O F 3. CM zero-cycles on Hilbert modular varieties In this section we review some facts we will need regarding CM zero-cycles on Hilbert modular varieties following Bruinier and Yang [BY, Section 3]. See also the recent book of Howard and Yang [HY]. Let F be a totally real number field of degree n over Q. For S F, let S + be the subset of S consisting of totally positive elements. For a fractional ideal f 0 of F, let ( ) α β Γ(f 0 ) = SL(O F f 0 ) = {M = SL γ δ 2 (F ) : α, δ O F, β f 0, γ f 1 0 }.

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 9 Recall that Γ(f 0 ) acts on H n by The quotient space Mz = (σ 1 (M)z 1,..., σ n (M)z n ). X(f 0 ) = Γ(f 0 )\H n is the (open) Hilbert modular variety associated to f 0. The variety X(f 0 ) parameterizes isomorphism classes of triples (A, i, m) where (A, i) is an abelian variety with real multiplication i : O F End(A) and m : ( ) ( M A, M + A ( F f 0 ) 1, ( F f 0 ) 1,+) is an O F -isomorphism from M A to ( F f 0 ) 1 which maps M + A to ( F f 0 ) 1,+. Here M A is the polarization module of A and M + A is its positive cone. Let K be a CM extension of F and Φ = (σ 1,..., σ n ) be a CM type of K. A point z = (A, i, m) X(f 0 ) is a CM point of type (K, Φ) if one of the following equivalent definitions holds: (1) As a point z H n, there is a point τ K such that and is a fractional ideal of K. Φ(τ) = (σ 1 (τ),..., σ n (τ)) = z Λ τ = f 0 + O F τ (2) (A, i ) is a CM abelian variety of type (K, Φ) with complex multiplication i : O K End(A) such that i = i OF. Fix ε 0 K such that ε 0 = ε 0 and Φ(ε 0 ) = (σ 1 (ε 0 ),..., σ n (ε 0 )) H n. Let a be a fractional ideal of K and f a = ε 0 K/F aa F. By [BY, Lemma 3.1], the CM abelian variety (A a = C n /Φ(a), i) defines a CM point on X(f 0 ) if there exists an r F such that f a = rf 0. Thus any pair (a, r) with a a fractional ideal of K and r F with f a = rf 0 defines a CM point (A a, i, m) X(f 0 ) (we refer the reader to [BY] for a discussion of how the O F - isomorphism m depends on r). Two such pairs (a 1, r 1 ) and (a 2, r 2 ) are equivalent if there exists an α K such that a 2 = αa 1 and r 2 = r 1 αᾱ. Write [a, r] for the class of (a, r) and identify it with its associated CM point (A a, i, m) X(f 0 ). By [BY, Lemma 3.2], given a CM point [a, r] X(f 0 ) there is a decomposition a = O F α + f 0 β with z = α/β K H n = {z K : Φ(z) H n }. Moreover, z represents the CM point [a, r] X(f 0 ). Let CM(K, Φ, f 0 ) be the set of CM points [a, r] X(f 0 ), which we view as a CM zero-cycle in X(f 0 ). Let CM(K, Φ) = CM(K, Φ, f 0 ), [f 0 ] CL(F ) + where CL(F ) + is the narrow ideal class group of F. The forgetful map CM(K, Φ) CL(K), [a, r] [a]

10 RIAD MASRI is surjective. Each fiber is indexed by ɛ O,+ F or 2; in particular, it equals 1 if ɛ N K/F O K. Assume now that F has narrow class number 1. Then and the forgetful map CM(K, Φ) = CM(K, Φ, O F ), CM(K, Φ) CL(K) /N K/F O K. Here #(O,+ F /N K/F O K ) equals 1 is injective (hence bijective) since N K/F O K = O F. We will repeatedly use this bijection to identify the zero-cycle of CM points CM(K, Φ, O F ) X F := X(O F ) with the set {z a K H n : [a] CL(K)}, where z a represents [a, r] X F as above. The reader should keep in mind that the later set depends on Φ. 4. Proof of Theorem 1.1 We first establish the following version of the Kronecker limit formula for CM fields. Theorem 4.1. Let F be a totally real number field of degree n over Q with narrow class number 1. Let K be a CM extension of F with a CM type Φ. For each class C CL(K), let z a be the CM point in CM(K, Φ, O F ) corresponding to C 1. Then we have where and lim s 1 [ ζ K (s, C) (2π)n R K (2π) n R K w K dk ] 1 = w K dk s 1 ( π n A F + 2 log(d F ) log(d K ) 2 log G(z a ) E 1 df G(z) := ), ( 2 n d F / d K ) N(y(z)) φ(z) 2 (4.1) φ(z) := f(z) 1/4E 1. Proof. Fix a CM type Φ for K. Let C CL(K), and fix an integral ideal a C 1. Then the partial Dedekind zeta function equals ζ K (s, C) = N K/Q (b) s b C = N K/Q (a 1 (ω)) s (ω) a = N K/Q (a) s N K/Q ((ω)) s. Notice that ω a/o K N K/Q ((ω)) s = O ω a/o K 1 K : O F ω a/o F N K/Q ((ω)) s.

Thus we have KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 11 ζ K (s, C) = N K/Q(a) s O K : O F ω a/o F By the facts in Section 3 there exists a decomposition a = O F α + O F β, N K/Q ((ω)) s. where z a = β/α K H n and z a represents the CM point [a, r] X F (here f 0 = O F since #CL(F ) + = 1). Then N K/Q ((ω)) s = N K/Q ((aα + bβ)) s ω a/o F (a,b) O F O F /O F = N K/Q ((α)) s N K/Q ((a + bz a )). By a calculation with the CM type Φ we obtain (a,b) O F O F /O F N K/Q ((a + bz a )) = N (a + bz a ) 2, where we have identified z a with Φ(z a ) H n. Moreover, one has N K/Q (a/(α)) = N(y(z a )) 2n d F dk. By combining the preceding calculations, we obtain ( ) 2 n s d F 1 ζ K (s, C) = dk O K : O F ( ) 2 n s d F 1 = dk O K : O E(z a, s). F (a,b) O F O F /O F N(y(z a )) s N(a + bz a ) 2s Observe that ( ) 2 n s 1 ( ) d F 2 n d F = 1 + log (s 1) + O(s 1) 2. dk dk Then after a calculation using the Laurent expansion E(z a, s) = E 1 s 1 + E 0(z a ) + O(s 1) given by (2.3), we obtain the limit formula in the theorem. Remark 4.2. If F = Q in Theorem 4.1, we recover the Kronecker limit formula (1.2). The function φ(z) is positive and real-analytic. In the following proposition, we identify how φ(z) transforms with respect to SL 2 (O F ) (see also [S, pp. 108-109]). ( ) α β Proposition 4.3. For all M = SL γ δ 2 (O F ), we have φ(mz) = N(γz + δ) 1 2 φ(z).

12 RIAD MASRI Proof. From the relation (2.1) we see that E(z, s) has weight 0 with respect to SL 2 (O F ). Then the Laurent expansion (2.3) implies that E 0 (Mz) = E 0 (z), which by (2.4) implies that ( ) N(Im(Mz)) log f(mz) = log f(z) + E 1 log. N(Im(z)) A straightforward calculation shows that and thus N(Im(Mz)) N(Im(z)) = N(γz + δ) 2, f(mz) = N(γz + δ) 2E 1 f(z). The result now follows from the definition of φ(z). Remark 4.4. By Proposition 4.3, the function G : H n R + defined by (4.1) has weight 0 with respect to SL 2 (O F ) and thus is well-defined on CM points. We can now deduce Theorem 1.1. Proof of Theorem 1.1: For a class group character χ of K, let L K (χ, s) = χ(c)ζ K (s, C) be its associated L function. By orthogonality for group characters, if χ is nontrivial we have χ(c) = 0. The theorem now follows from Theorem 4.1. 5. Proof of Theorem 1.3 Let K be a CM field with Gal(K/Q) = (Z/2Z) r for some integer r 2, and let E be an unramified quadratic extension of K with Gal(E/Q) = (Z/2Z) r+1. Then the zeta function ζ E (s) (resp. ζ K (s)) factors as ζ(s) times the product of the quadratic Dirichlet L functions associated to the quadratic subfields of E (resp. K). Note that there are 2 r 1 quadratic subfields of K, 2 r+1 1 quadratic subfields of E, and 2 r quadratic subfields of E that are not contained in K. By class field theory, the unramified extension E/K gives rise to a real class group character χ of K (a genus character) whose L-function factors as L K (χ, s) = ζ E(s) ζ K (s). Then by the preceding facts we obtain the factorization 2 r L K (χ, s) = L(χ i, s), i=1 where χ i for 1 i 2 r are the Kronecker symbols associated to the quadratic subfields Q( i ) of E which are not contained in K.

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 13 Divide the discriminants i into two disjoint sets, S R := { i : i > 0} and S I := { i : i < 0}. Then we obtain the following formula for L K (χ, 1) using Dirichlet s class number formula (1.4) for quadratic fields, L K (χ, 1) = 22r π #S I 2 r i=1 h( i) i S R log(ε i ) i. (5.1) i S I w i 2 r i=1 On the other hand, by Theorem 1.1 we have L K (χ, 1) = 2n+1 π n R K w K dk χ(c) log G(z a ). (5.2) Observe that #S R = #S I = 2 r 1 = [F : Q] = n, and the regulators of K and F satisfy the relation R K = 2 n 1 R F (see [W, p. 41]). The theorem now follows by equating (5.1) and (5.2) and simplifying the resulting expression. 6. Proof Theorem 1.4 Let F = Q( p) where p 1 mod 4 is a prime such that F has narrow class number 1. Let D = D 1 D 2 < 0 be a composite fundamental discriminant with D 1 > 0 and D 2 < 0 fundamental discriminants. Let K = Q( D, pd), which is a CM biquadratic extension of Q with Gal(K/Q) = (Z/2Z) 2. Let E = Q( D 1, D 2, p), which is an unramified quadratic extension of K with Gal(E/Q) = (Z/2Z) 3. Let χ be the genus character of K arising from the extension E/K, and let K denote Q( ) for a fundamental discriminant. Then we have the following diagram: E = Q( D 1, D 2, p) χ K = Q( D, pd) K D1 K D2 K D F = Q( p) K pd K pd1 K pd2 We have Then the factorizations Q L K (χ, s) = ζ E(s) ζ K (s). ζ E (s) = ζ(s)l(χ p, s)l(χ D, s)l(χ pd, s)l(χ D1, s)l(χ D2, s)l(χ pd1, s)l(χ pd2, s)

14 RIAD MASRI and yield ζ K (s) = ζ(s)l(χ p, s)l(χ D, s)l(χ pd, s) L K (χ, s) = L(χ D1, s)l(χ D2, s)l(χ pd1, s)l(χ pd2, s). By Dirichlet s class number formula (1.4) for quadratic fields, we have L K (χ, 1) = 2 log(ε D 1 )h(d 1 ) 2πh(D 2 ) 2 log(ε pd1 )h(pd 1 ) 2πh(pD 2 ) D1 w D2 D2 pd1 w pd2 pd2. (6.1) On the other hand, by Theorem 1.1 we have L K (χ, 1) = 16π2 log(ε p ) w K dk χ(c) log G(z a ), (6.2) where we used R K = 2 log(ε p ) (see [W, Proposition 4.16]). The theorem now follows by equating (6.1) and (6.2) and simplifying the resulting expression. 7. Proof of Theorem 1.6 Assume first that r = 2. Then K = (Z/2Z) 2, E = (Z/2Z) 3, and the maximal totally real subfield F of K is real quadratic. Let Q( D 1 ) and Q( D 2 ) be the real quadratic subfields of E which are not contained in K, and let F = Q( D 3 ). Then because R K = 2 log(ε D3 ), it suffices to show that A := exp(b) is transcendental, where B := Q 1 Q2 log(ε D1 ) log(ε D2 ) log(ε D3 ) for rational numbers Q 1, Q 2 Q. Let x 1 := log(ε D1 ), x 2 := log(ε D2 ) and x 3 := log(ε D3 ). Then Q(x 1, x 2, x 3, exp(x 1 ), exp(x 2 ), exp(x 3 )) = Q(log(ε D1 ), log(ε D2 ), log(ε D3 )). Because ε D1, ε D2 and ε D3 are multiplicatively independent, x 1, x 2 and x 3 are linearly independent over Q. Then by Schanuel s conjecture (see Conjecture 1.5), the field Q(log(ε D1 ), log(ε D2 ), log(ε D3 )) has transcendence degree at least 3 over Q, and hence exactly 3 as it is generated by 3 elements. In particular, x 1, x 2 and x 3 are algebraically independent over Q. We claim that because x 1, x 2 and x 3 are algebraically independent over Q, the numbers x 1, x 2, x 3 and x 4 := B are linearly independent over Q. To see this, suppose to the contrary that there exist rational numbers α i Q, not all zero, such that Define the polynomial α 1 x 1 + α 2 x 2 + α 3 x 3 + α 4 B = 0. (7.1) q(t 1, t 2, t 3 ) := α 1 t 1 t 3 + α 2 t 2 t 3 + α 3 t 2 3 + α 4 Q 1 Q2 t 1 t 2.

KRONECKER S SOLUTION OF PELL S EQUATION FOR CM FIELDS 15 Then (7.1) implies that q(x 1, x 2, x 3 ) = 0, which contradicts the algebraic independence of x 1, x 2 and x 3 over Q. Thus x 1, x 2, x 3 and x 4 are linearly independent over Q. By another application of Schanuel s conjecture, the field Q(x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4, exp(x 1 ), exp(x 2 ), exp(x 3 ), exp(x 4 )) = Q(log(ε D1 ), log(ε D2 ), log(ε D3 ), B, A) = Q(log(ε D1 ), log(ε D2 ), log(ε D3 ), A) has transcendence degree at least 4 over Q, hence A must be transcendental. This completes the proof when r = 2. Next assume that r 2. Then K = (Z/2Z) r, E = (Z/2Z) r+1, and F = (Z/2Z) r 1. The rank of the unit group O F is n 1, where n = [F : Q], and recall that the regulators of K and F satisfy the relation R K = 2 n 1 R F. Let ε 1,..., ε n 1 be fundamental units for the n 1 real quadratic subfields of F. These units form a set of multiplicatively independent units in F which are a basis for O F /{±1}, and thus R F = det(log σ i (ε j ) ) 1 i,j n 1 where the σ i run through any n 1 embeddings of F. The conjugate of a unit in a real quadratic field is, up to a sign, its inverse. Thus for σ Gal(F/Q), either σ(ε j ) = ε j or σ(ε j ) = ±ε 1 j. It follows that the regulator R F is a positive integer multiple of the product log(ε 1 ) log(ε n 1 ). Therefore it suffices to show that exp(c) is transcendental, where C := Q i S R log(ε i ) 3 Q4 log(ε 1 ) log(ε n 1 ) for rational numbers Q 3, Q 4 Q. Because the units {ε 1,..., ε n 1 } {ε i : i S R } are multiplicatively independent, a straightforward modification of the argument for r = 2 shows that exp(c) is transcendental. References [A] T. Asai, On a certain function analogous to log η(z). Nagoya Math. J. 40 (1970), 193 211. [BY] J. H. Bruinier and T. H. Yang, CM-values of Hilbert modular functions. Invent. Math. 163 (2006), 229 288. [BWW] D. A. Buell, H. C. Williams, and K. S. Williams, On the imaginary bicyclic biquadratic fields with class-number 2. Math. Comp. 31 (1977), 1034-1042. [HY] B. Howard and T. H. Yang, Intersections of Hirzebruch-Zagier divisors and CM cycles. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2041, (2011). [K] S. Konno, On Kronecker s limit formula in a totally imaginary quadratic field over a totally real algebraic number field. J. Math. Soc. Japan 17 (1965), 411 424. [MM1] M. Ram Murty and V. Kumar Murty, Transcendental values of class group L functions. Math. Ann. 351 (2011), 835 855. [MM2] M. Ram Murty and V. Kumar Murty, Transcendental values of class group L functions, II. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 3041 3047. [S] C. L. Siegel, Lectures on advanced analytic number theory. Notes by S. Raghavan. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics, No. 23 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay 1965 iii+331+iii pp.

16 RIAD MASRI [Wa] M. Waldschmidt, Diophantine approximation on linear algebraic groups. Transcendence properties of the exponential function in several variables. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 326. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000. xxiv+633 pp. [W] L. Washington, Introduction to cyclotomic fields. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 83. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. xiv+487 pp. Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 E-mail address: masri@math.tamu.edu