This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

Similar documents
C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

= = = (a) Use the MATLAB command rref to solve the system. (b) Let A be the coefficient matrix and B be the right-hand side of the system.

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

2 More examples with details

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Beyond Worst-Case Analysis Luca Trevisan September 5, 2017

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Differentiating Gaussian Processes

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Singular Value Decomposition: Theory and Applications

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

8. Superfluid to Mott-insulator transition

For all questions, answer choice E) NOTA" means none of the above answers is correct.

First day August 1, Problems and Solutions

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

A Quantum Gauss-Bonnet Theorem

From Biot-Savart Law to Divergence of B (1)

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. SOLUTIONS to RE-EXAM for ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. COURSE CODES: FFR 135, FIM 720 GU, PhD

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES EXAMPLES OF C ALGEBRAS

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

Dynamic Systems on Graphs

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Open string operator quantization

Grover s Algorithm + Quantum Zeno Effect + Vaidman

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Structure and Drive Paul A. Jensen Copyright July 20, 2003

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

9 Characteristic classes

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

Mechanics Physics 151

7. Products and matrix elements

Lorentz Group. Ling Fong Li. 1 Lorentz group Generators Simple representations... 3

Magnetic nano-grains from a non-magnetic material: a possible explanation

1 GSW Iterative Techniques for y = Ax

V.C The Niemeijer van Leeuwen Cumulant Approximation

The Dirac Equation for a One-electron atom. In this section we will derive the Dirac equation for a one-electron atom.

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

5 The Rational Canonical Form

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

IV. Performance Optimization

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

Canonical transformations

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Lecture Notes on Linear Regression

Stanford University CS359G: Graph Partitioning and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevisan January 13, 2011

Supplemental document

Math1110 (Spring 2009) Prelim 3 - Solutions

More metrics on cartesian products

Binding energy of a Cooper pairs with non-zero center of mass momentum in d-wave superconductors

Lecture 3: Probability Distributions

Complex Numbers Alpha, Round 1 Test #123

DECOUPLING THEORY HW2

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

1 Derivation of Point-to-Plane Minimization

Computing π with Bouncing Balls

CSCE 790S Background Results

Spectral Graph Theory and its Applications September 16, Lecture 5

Math 217 Fall 2013 Homework 2 Solutions

Dynamics of a Superconducting Qubit Coupled to an LC Resonator

The Feynman path integral

MTH 263 Practice Test #1 Spring 1999

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Solutions to Problem Set 6

Physics 4B. A positive value is obtained, so the current is counterclockwise around the circuit.

The equation of motion of a dynamical system is given by a set of differential equations. That is (1)

), it produces a response (output function g (x)

PHY2049 Exam 2 solutions Fall 2016 Solution:

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

Line Drawing and Clipping Week 1, Lecture 2

Module 9. Lecture 6. Duality in Assignment Problems

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Formulas for the Determinant

Homework Notes Week 7

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

Difference Equations

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

The Prncpal Component Transform The Prncpal Component Transform s also called Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT, Hotellng Transform, oregenvector Transfor

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Random Walks on Digraphs

Non-interacting Spin-1/2 Particles in Non-commuting External Magnetic Fields

At zero K: All atoms frozen at fixed positions on a periodic lattice.

Internal Mobility Edge in Doped Graphene: Frustration in a Renormalized Lattice

Eigenvalues of Random Graphs

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

Fundamental loop-current method using virtual voltage sources technique for special cases

LECTURE 9 CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS

PHYS 1101 Practice problem set 12, Chapter 32: 21, 22, 24, 57, 61, 83 Chapter 33: 7, 12, 32, 38, 44, 49, 76

Transcription:

1 Problem set #1 1.1. A one-band model on a square lattce Fg. 1 Consder a square lattce wth only nearest-neghbor hoppngs (as shown n the fgure above): H t, j a a j (1.1) where,j stands for nearest neghbors (sold bonds n the fgure above). Here we assume that the hoppng strength t s real. In ths model, all lattce stes are equvalent and thus each unt cell contans only one ste. As a result, the band structure for ths model contans only one band. 1.1.1. -space Ths model contans two bonds per unt cell (one along the x-drecton and the other along y). So we can rewrte the Hamltonan as: H t a a e x r t a a e y r t a a e x t a r a r e y (1.2) Here e x a, 0 and ey 0, a are the lattce vectors (the two green vectors shown n the fgure above) wth a the length of the nearest-neghbor bonds. The frst term n the Hamltonan descrbes hoppngs along the +x drecton. The second one shows hoppngs along +y. The last two terms are the Hermtan conjugate of the frst two, and they are hoppngs along -x and -y drectons. The sum s over all unt cells.

2 homewor1.nb Rewrte the Hamltonan n -space as H Ε 1 a a usng the Fourer transform: a 1 N a r and a 1 N a r (1.3) Fnd the dsperson relaton Ε 1 and show that Ε 1 x, y s a perodc functon Ε 1 x 2 n a, y 2 m a Ε 1 x, y (1.4) for any ntegers m and n. 1.1.2. Complex hoppngs Fg. 2 Let s consder the same lattce, but now we allow the hoppng strength to be complex. Here, we assume that the hoppngs along the y-axs have real coeffcent t. For hoppngs along the x-axs, the hoppng strength s t e Φ f the hoppng s toward the +x drecton (along the arrows shown n Fg. 2). Due to the Hermtan condton H H, the hoppng toward the -x drecton has coeffcent t Φ. The Hamltonan now reads: H t Φ a a e x r t a a e y r t Φ a a e x t a r a r e y (1.5) Rewrte the Hamltonan n -space as H Ε 2 a a usng Fourer transformatons. Fnd the dsperson relaton Ε 2. Show that Ε x, y s also a perodc functon Ε 1 x 2 n a, y 2 m a Ε 1 x, y (1.6) for any ntegers m and n. 1.1.3. Compare the two models Compare the band structure fnd n problem 1.1.1 and 1.1.2,.e.. Ε 1 x, y and Ε 2 x, y. Show that these two dspersons are actually the same functon f one shfts the momentum by some constant: Ε 1 x, y Ε 2 x Α, y Β (1.7) Fnd Α and Β. 1.1.4. Why the two models have the same band structure (up to a shft of )? As mentoned n the lecture, the phase of the hoppng strength for each ndvdual bond doesn t have any physcal meanng. The only thng matters

homewor1.nb 3 here s the flux through each plaquette (sum over all phases around a plaquette). Chec the flux through each plaquette for both these two models and show that they are the same. If two models have the same flux pattern, they are actually the same model, although the phase on each bond may be dfferent. In other words, the two model are connected by a gauge transformaton. Let s consder the Hamltonan of problem 1.1.2 H t Φ a a e x r t a a e y r Perform the followng gauge transformaton: t Φ a a e x t a r a r e y (1.8) a r a exp Φ x a a r (1.9) a r a exp Φ x a a r Here x s the x component of r. Now, rewrte the Hamltonan usng a terms of a and a r, the Hamltonan turns nto r (1.10) and a r as our annhlaton and creatons operators. Please show that n H t a a e t a x r a e t a y r a t a e a x e y (1.11) whch s exactly the Hamltonan we studed n problem 1.1.1. So ndeed the two models are dentcal. 1.2. A two-band model on a square lattce wth Drac ponts Fg. 3 Let s consder the same lattce. Now we choose the phase of hoppngs accordng to the arrows shown n Fg. 3. H t, j Φj a b j h.c. (1.12) Here, we assume that electrons can hop only between nearest neghbors and we also assume all the nearest-neghbor hoppng strength to have the same absolute value (t, whch s real and postve). For the complex phase Φ j, f the hoppng s along the drecton of the arrow, Φ j 4, so that the hoppng strength s t 4. In the opposte drecton (aganst the arrow), the hoppng strength s t 4. For ths model, there are two dfferent types of stes (red and blac). For the red stes, the arrows at ths ste pont away from the ste along x and towards the ste along y. For the blac stes, the arrows pont towards the ste along x and away from the ste along y. To ndcate that we have two dfferent types of ste, we use a and a to represent fermon creaton and annhlaton operators for the red stes and usng b and b for the blac ste. Because we have two types of

4 homewor1.nb stes, we now that the model wll gve us two bands. 1.2.1. magnetc flux and tme-reversal symmetry Consder a square formed by four nearest-neghbor bonds, whch s the smallest plaquette on ths lattce. If we goes around the square (n the counter-cloc drecton), the Aharonov Bohm phase pced up by the electron s: Φ 1 Φ 2 Φ 3 Φ 3 4 4 ± For ths lattce, half of the squares have + and the other half have -. As we learned n the lecture, a ±-flux doesn t brea the tme-reversal symmetry, because. Therefore, ths model s tme-reversally nvarant, smlar to graphene (although we do have complex hoppngs here, they don t brea the tme-reversal symmetry) 1.2.2. fnd the Band structure Ths model contans four bonds per unt cell (the four bonds around one blac ste). (1.13) H t 4 a b e x r t 4 a b e x r t 4 a b e y r t 4 a b e y r t 4 b a e x r t 4 b a e x r t 4 b a e y r t 4 b a e y r (1.14) Here, e x a, 0 and ey 0, a wth a beng the length of the nearest-neghbor bonds. The frst term n the Hamltonan descrbes hoppngs from b to a along the +x drecton. The second, thrd and fourth ones are along -x, +y and -y drectons respectvely. The last four terms are the Hermtan conjugate of the frst four, whch descrbes hoppngs from a stes to b stes. The sum here sums over all unt cells. Rewrte the Hamltonan n the -space as H a, b 0 a a 0 b a 0 a b 0 b b a b (1.15) Fnd the two-by-two matrx, whch s the ernel of the Hamltonan 0 0 a a 0 a b 0 b a 0 b b (1.16) Fnd the egenvalues of 0 as a functon of x and y, Ε ± x, y 1.2.3. Drac ponts Show that the two bands touch each other at 2 a, 2 a and 2 a, 2 a, Ε 2 a, 2 a Ε 2 a, 2 a Ε 2 a, 2 a Ε 2 a, 2 a (1.17) (1.18) Expand the dsperson Ε ± x, y near the pont, as a power seres: Ε Ε 2 a q x, 2 a q y v F q 2 x q 2 y Oq 2 2 a q x, 2 a q y v F q 2 x q 2 y Oq 2 Fnd the Ferm veloctes v F. Here we fnd two band crossng ponts and near the band crossng ponts, the energy s a lnear functon of the momentum q q x 2 q y 2. In other words, we fnd two Drac ponts n ths model, smlar to graphene. (1.19) (1.20) 1.2.4. the Brlloun zone

homewor1.nb 5 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 Fg. 4 Contour plot for Ε as a functon of x and y. Here I set a 1. Darer color means smaller Ε. The two green arrows are the vectors Q 1 and Q 2 defned below. The blac square mars the frst Brlloun zone and the two red dots mars the two Drac ponts. Show that Ε s a perodc functon (the same s true for Ε ) Ε m Q 1 n Q2 Ε (1.21) for any ntegers m and n. Here Q 1, and Q a a 2,. As a result, the Brlloun zone s the square wth four corner ponts located at a a a, 0, 0, a, a, 0 and 0, a. The Brlloun zone and the two vectors Q 1 Drac ponts. and Q2 are shown on the fgure above, as well as the 1.3. two-band model on a square lattce wth a nontrval Chern number Fg. 5

6 homewor1.nb Let s add next-nearest-neghbor hoppngs to the model we consdered above n Problem 1.2. Here we eep the nearest-neghbor hoppngs the same as n Problem 1.2. H H NN H NNN (1.22) Here H NN descrbes the nearest-neghbor hoppngs and t s the same as the Eq. (1.12). H NN t, j Φj a b j h.c. (1.23) H NNN are the next-nearest-neghbor hoppngs whch are mared by the dagonal lnes n Fg. 5. Here we assume that all the next-nearest-neghbor hoppngs are real. Along the sold dagonal lnes, the hoppng strength s t. Along dashed lnes, the strength s -t. (They have opposte sgns) H NNN, j t j ' a a j, j t j ' b b j (1.24) 1.3.1. magnetc flux and tme-reversal symmetry Consder a trangle formed by two nearest-neghbor bonds and one next-nearest-neghbor bond, whch s the smallest plaquette on ths lattce. If we goes around the square (n the counter-cloc drecton), the Aharonov Bohm phase pced up by the electron s: Φ 1 Φ 2 Φ 3 The phase for nearest-neghbor hoppngs are ± 4 (Φ 1 Φ 2 ± 4). For next-nearest-neghbor bonds, the phase s 0 f t j ' 0 and f t j ' 0. Therefore the total phase s (1.25) Φ 1 Φ 2 Φ 3 ± 2 or Φ 1 Φ 2 Φ 3 ± 2 (1.26) These fluxes are NOT nteger tmes. As we learned n the lecture, they brea the tme-reversal symmetry. So ths model s NOT tme-reversally nvarant. 1.3.2. Band structure H NN has been taen care of n the prevous problem. Now we convert H NNN nto -space. For red-red hoppngs, there are two next-nearestneghbor bonds per unt cell, one along the 45-degree lne and the other along 135-degree lne. In addton, there are two other NNN bonds for blac-blac hoppngs. As a result the Hamltonan s: H NNN t ' a v1 a r t ' a v2 a r t ' b v1 b r t ' b v2 b r h.c. (1.27) Here, v 1 a, a and v2 a, a wth a beng the length of the nearest-neghbor bonds. The sum here sums over all unt cells. Rewrte H NNN n the -space as H NNN a, b 1 a a 1 b a 1 a b 1 b b a b (1.28) Fnd the two-by-two matrx, whch s the ernel of the Hamltonan for H NNN 1 1 a a 1 a b 1 b a 1 b b (1.29) As a result, the full Hamltonan H H NN H NNN tae the followng form n -space H a, b a a b a a b b b a b (1.30) where 0 1. Fnd the matrx and fnd ts egenvalues Ε ±. Show that gaps open up at the two Drac ponts by computng the gap: Ε 2 a, 2 a Ε 2 a, 2 a (1.31)

homewor1.nb 7 Ε 2 a, 2 a Ε 2 a, 2 a Fnd and show >0 as long as t s nonzero. (1.32) 1.3.3. Egenvectors To fnd the egenvectors of 0 1, we frst rewrte the two two matrx n terms of dentty and Paul matrces. 0 I x Σ x y Σ y z Σ z (1.33) where I 1 0 0 1 and Σ x 0 1 1 0 and Σ y 0 0 and Σ z 1 0 0 1. (1.34) Fnd the four coeffcents 0, x, y and z and show that u I 1 I z x y (1.35) s one egenvector for the lower band. In addton, please show that u II 1 II x y z (1.36) s also a egenvector for the lower band. 1.3.4. Can one use one wavefuncton to cover the whole Brlloun zone? Compute u I and u II at, and show that one of them s sngular. Compute u I and u II at, and show that one of them s sngular. Can one use a sngle wavefuncton u I or u II to cover the whole Brlloun zone? 1.3.5. Compute the Chern number Draw a small crcle around the pont, to separate the Brlloun zone nto two regons: nsde and outsde. Insde the crcle, use wavefuncton u I and outsde use u II. Now there s no sngular pont. As we have proved n class, at the boundary of these two regons (the crcle), the two wavefunctons are connected by a gauge transformaton Χ x y x y (1.37) Expand near, as 2 a q x, 2 a q y At small q, show that (1.38) Χ x y x y q x q y 1 34 q x q y Θ 3 4 (1.39) where Θ s the polar angle. As a result, the Chern number s

8 homewor1.nb C 1 ΧΘ 0 ΧΘ 2 1 2 So ths s a topologcal nsulator, f we fll the lowest band. (1.40) 1.4. (optonal) two-band model on a square lattce: topologcally trval nsulator Let s consder the same model as n Problem 1.2 (wth only nearest-neghbor hoppngs). Now we add dfferent potental energy for a stes and b stes H t, j Φj a b j h.c.v a a b b (1.41) Fnd the ernel of the Hamltonan for ths model, whch s a two-by-two matrx. Fnd ts egenvalues and show that gaps are opened at the two Drac ponts. Expand the ernel n terms of dentty and Paul matrces. 0 I x Σ x y Σ y z Σ z (1.42) Compute u I and u II at, and show that one of the s sngular. Compute ui and u II at, and show that one of the s sngular. Can one use a sngle wavefuncton u I or u II to cover the whole momentum space?