P. Tinyakov 1,2 TELESCOPE ARRAY: LATEST RESULTS. P. Tinyakov. for the Telescope Array Collaboration. Telescope Array detector.

Similar documents
SERCH FOR LARGE-SCALE

P. Tinyakov 1 TELESCOPE ARRAY: LATEST RESULTS. P. Tinyakov. for the Telescope Array Collaboration. Telescope Array detector. Spectrum.

Results from the Telescope Array Experiment

OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS

Recent Results of the Telescope Array Experiment. Gordon Thomson University of Utah

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics. Hang Bae Kim Hanyang University Hangdang Workshop,

UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era

Studies of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays with the Pierre Auger Observatory

Study of the arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory

The Pierre Auger Observatory Status - First Results - Plans

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays What we have learnt from. HiRes and Auger. Andreas Zech Observatoire de Paris (Meudon) / LUTh

The AUGER Experiment. D. Martello Department of Physics University of Salento & INFN Lecce. D. Martello Dep. of Physics Univ. of Salento & INFN LECCE

Ultra- high energy cosmic rays

Measurement of air shower maxima and p-air cross section with the Telescope Array

ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

Extensive Air Showers and Particle Physics Todor Stanev Bartol Research Institute Dept Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware

Multi-Messenger Astonomy with Cen A?

RECENT RESULTS FROM THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY

The High Resolution Fly s Eye (HiRes) Experiment. John N. Matthews University of Utah

PoS(ICRC2015)657. Telescope Array extension: TA 4

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Observations and Analysis

The Pierre Auger Project: Status and Recent Results. Pierre Auger Project. Astrophysical motivation

NEW VIEWS OF THE UNIVERSE. Recent Studies of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays. Alan Watson University of Leeds, UK (regular KICP Visitor)

Mass Composition Study at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Recent results on UHECRs from the Pierre Auger Observatory. Olivier Deligny (IPN Orsay), on behalf the Pierre Auger Collaboration

Parameters Sensitive to the Mass Composition of Cosmic Rays and Their Application at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Anisotropy studies with the Pierre Auger Observatory

PoS(ICRC2017)548. Telescope Array anisotropy summary

Ultrahigh Energy cosmic rays II

UHECR autocorrelation function after Auger

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 25 Mar 2015

Measurement of Anisotropy and Search for UHECR Sources

UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory

Charged Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos

Highlights from the Telescope Array Experiment

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 10 Nov 2011

PoS(ICRC2015)326. TA anisotropy summary

First Results from the Pierre Auger Project

A few grams of matter in a bright world

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 24 Mar 2015

Status and results from the Pierre Auger Observatory

An Auger Observatory View of Centaurus A

Is the search for the origin of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays over? Alan Watson University of Leeds, England

EVIDENCE OF INTERMEDIATE-SCALE ENERGY SPECTRUM ANISOTROPY IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE FROM TELESCOPE ARRAY

Experimental Constraints to high energy hadronic interaction models using the Pierre Auger Observatory part-i

Recent measurements of ultra-high energy cosmic rays and their impact on hadronic interaction modeling

The Pierre Auger Observatory: on the arrival directions of the most energetic cosmic rays

The Pierre Auger Observatory in 2007

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Tale of Two Observatories

Extensive Air Shower and cosmic ray physics above ev. M. Bertaina Univ. Torino & INFN

HiRes Composition. John Belz, University of Utah Nuclear Interactions Workshop University of Washington 20 February 2008

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays (III)

Overview: UHECR spectrum and composition Arrival directions and magnetic field Method for search for UHE nuclei sources Application to the Auger data

STATUS OF ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

Search for UHE photons and neutrinos using Telescope Array surface detector

Arrival directions of the highest-energy cosmic rays detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory

Intergalactic Magnetic Field and Arrival Direction of Ultra-High-Energy Protons

Search for clustering of ultra high energy cosmic rays from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Cosmic Rays in large air-shower detectors

THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY: STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS

Charged-particle and gamma-ray astronomy: deciphering charged messages from the world s most powerful

Recent Results of the Observatory Pierre Auger. João R. T. de Mello Neto Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS WHERE DO WE STAND AFTER 10 YEARS AT THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY

Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Studies on UHECR composition and hadronic interactions by the Pierre Auger Observatory

UHECRs sources and the Auger data

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Oct 2004

Recent results from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Full author list:

High Energy Messenger Workshop KICP, June Foteini Oikonomou

Higher Statistics UHECR observatories: a new era for a challenging astronomy

Search for ultra-high energy photons and neutrinos at the Pierre Auger Observatory

EeV Neutrinos in UHECR Surface Detector Arrays:

The Highest Energy Cosmic Rays

Latest results and perspectives of the KASCADE-Grande EAS facility

Cosmic Rays: high/low energy connections

The Pierre Auger Observatory

Searches for cosmic ray anisotropies at ultra-high energies

Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory. Paul Sommers, Penn State August 7, 2008, SSI

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays. Malina Kirn March 1, 2007 Experimental Gravitation & Astrophysics

The air-shower experiment KASCADE-Grande

Experimental High-Energy Astroparticle Physics

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

Cosmic ray studies at the Yakutsk EAS array: energy spectrum and mass composition

Development of a prototype for Fluorescence detector Array of Single-pixel Telescopes (FAST)

UltraHigh Energy Cosmic Rays Corrected for Galaxy Magnetic Field Models: FRIs & BL Lacs (Galactic Plane sources?)

7 th International Workshop on New Worlds in Astroparticle Physics São Tomé, September 2009 THE AMIGA PROJECT

Air Shower Measurements from PeV to EeV

PoS(ICRC2015)349. TA Spectrum Summary

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 24 Feb 2013

AugerPrime. Primary cosmic ray identification for the next 10 years. Radomír Šmída.

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays & Neutrinos above the Terascale

Some Thoughts on Laboratory Astrophysics for UHE Cosmic Rays. Pierre Sokolsky University of Utah SABRE Workshop SLAC, March, 2006

Search for EeV Protons of Galactic Origin

Analysis of the modulation in the first harmonic of the right ascension distribution of cosmic rays detected at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Energy Spectrum of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays Measured by The Telescope Array

Cosmic Rays - in Poland

Correlation between the UHECRs measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory and Telescope Array and neutrino candidate events from IceCube

ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

Cosmic Rays in large air-shower detectors

Transcription:

1,2 1 Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium 2 Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia Telescope

Outline Telescope Telescope

UHECR ground-based experiments Telescope

ARRAY DETECTOR Telescope

ARRAY HYBRID DETECTOR Telescope 507 scintillator s covering 680 km 2 3 fluorescence sites, 38 telescopes Surface fully operational from March 2008 SD relative size: TA 9 AGASA PAO/4

TA surface s Telescope Deployed with the spacing 1.2 km Powered by solar panels. Connected by radio.

Telescope

Hybrid event example Telescope

SPECTRUM Telescope

TA spectrum TA measures spectrum by three techniques: Middle Drum fluorescence (FD-mono) Surface (SD) Hybrid (SD+FD) Telescope

FD-mono spectrum Telescope

Surface spectrum Dataset: Geometrical cuts: θ < 45 core inside the array, distance to border > 1200 m Cuts on reconstruction quality: number of s hit 4 χ 2 /d.o.f < 4.0 pointing direction resolution < 5 fractional S 800 uncertainty < 0.25 1.75 years, 6264 events after cuts Telescope

TA surface spectrum Telescope

SD, FD-mono and hybrid spectra Telescope Note: SD energy normalized by 27% down

Comparison with other experiments Telescope

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION Telescope

Telescope stereo result Telescope TA data favor protons [Y. Tameda, UHECR-2010, Nagoya]

TA X max distributions (I) Telescope

TA X max distributions (II) Telescope

ANISOTROPIES Telescope

Sky distribution, E > 10 EeV E>10 EeV Telescope Equatorial coordinates, 655 events

Sky distribution, E > 40 EeV Telescope Equatorial coordinates, 35 events

Sky distribution, E > 57 EeV Telescope Equatorial coordinates, 15 events

Search for clustering at small scales E > 10 EeV Telescope = no excess over background

Search for clustering at small scales E > 40 EeV Telescope = no excess over background

Test of correlations with AGN 472 AGN from 2006 Veron catalog with z < 0.018 (D < 75 Mpc) separation angle 3.1 CR E>57 EeV Telescope AGN z<0.018 Equatorial coordinates

Test of correlations with AGN 16 N_corr 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 expectation data background 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 N_tot Telescope Currently: observed 6, background 3.6, p = 16% = compatible with background

Correlation with LSS UHECR flux at high energies is expected to be anisotropic because matter distribution is not uniform at distances 100 Mpc The matter distribution can be modeled out to 250 Mpc from the XSCz catalog (T. Jarrett, in preparation) containing over 700 000 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts From the matter distribution the UHECR flux map may be calculated and compared to observation This involves a single parameter the smearing angle θ representing deflections in magnetic fields and finite angular resolution Telescope

Correlations with LSS E > 40 EeV Telescope Galactic coordinates

Correlations with LSS E > 57 EeV Telescope Galactic coordinates

Results of the statistical tests probability 1 0.1 NULL = structure E>40 EeV NULL = iso 95% CL 0.01 0.001 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 smearing angle, degrees Compatible with both structure and isotropy Telescope

Results of the statistical tests probability 1 0.1 0.01 NULL = structure NULL = iso E>57 EeV 95% CL 0.001 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 smearing angle, degrees Compatible with structure not compatible with isotropy @ 95%CL Telescope

PHOTON LIMIT Telescope

Photon flux limits 38 Log E 2 F Γ ev 2 km 2 yr 1 sr 1 37.5 37 36.5 36 35.5 PRELIMINARY Y Y Y A TA ICRC TA PA PA A PA Telescope 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 Log E min ev G.Rubtsov, JPS March 2010; Quarks 10

CONCLUSIONS TA observes the cut-off in the spectrum, significance currently is 3.5σ TA data favor light at high energies (like HiRes, unlike Auger) Almost fully consistent with isotropy (except perhaps at E > 57 EeV) no significant small-scale clustering no significant correlation with AGN no significant correlation with LSS Telescope

BACKUP SLIDES Telescope

TA surface in detail < Surface Detector > GPS scintillator box wlan (2.4GHz) solarpanel (120w) WLSF: 1.0mmφ (2cm separation) PMTs: 3m 2 ET 9123SA 2 (12mm 2 layers) 200kg electronics box + battery (100Ah) Telescope

atmosphere monitoring < Atmospheric Monitor (LIDAR, CLF) & LINAC > back-scat. side-scat. Telescope LIDAR 4mJ @355nm electron shower LINAC 40MeV 10 9 e (6.4mJ) CLF 5mJ @355nm 100m 20.85km

SD event example Telescope

FD event example Telescope

Energy scale Telescope SD energy: CORSIKA QGSJET-II full MC FD energy: MD mono, BRM, LR hybrid Result: E = E SD /1.27

Statistical significance of GZK cut-off Telescope G.Thomson, ICHEP 10, Paris

Auger & HiRES XMAX results Auger: Phys.Rev.Lett.104.091101 ] 2 <X max> [g/cm 850 800 750 700 650 18 10 QGSJET01 QGSJETII Sibyll2.1 EPOSv1.99 19 10 proton E [ev] HiRES: Phys.Rev.Lett.104.161101 iron ] 2 ) [g/cm max RMS(X 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 18 10 19 10 proton iron E [ev] Telescope

Telescope C: Centaurus supercluster (60 Mpc); Ca: Canes I group (4 Mpc) and Canes II group (9 Mpc); Co: Coma cluster (90 Mpc); E: Eridanus cluster (30 Mpc); F: Fornax cluster (20 Mpc); He: Hercules superclusters (140 Mpc); Hy: Hydra supercluster (50 Mpc); L: Leo supercluster (130 Mpc), Leo I group (10 Mpc), and Leo II group (20 Mpc); M81: M81 group (4 Mpc); M101: M101 group (8 Mpc); P: Pegasus cluster (60 Mpc); PI: Pavo-Indus supercluster (70 Mpc); PC: Pisces- Cetus supercluster (250 Mpc); PP: Perseus-Pisces supercluster (70 Mpc); S: Shapley supercluster (200 Mpc); UM: Ursa Major supercluster (240 Mpc), Ursa Major North group (20 Mpc), and Ursa Major South group (20 Mpc); V: Virgo cluster (20 Mpc); VII: Virgo II group (20 Mpc); VIII: Virgo III group (20 Mpc).

The statistical test ( flux sampling ) Telescope Events following the model would produce uniform distribution over the bands No binning is needed (on the picture it is for illustration only): two distributions may be compared by the KS test