Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Similar documents
ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMAND

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Introduction to structural dynamics

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Introduction to Continuous Systems. Continuous Systems. Strings, Torsional Rods and Beams.


CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading

Combined Effect of Soil Structure Interaction and Infill Wall Stiffness on Building_- A Review

3.4 Analysis for lateral loads

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

2C9 Design for seismic and climate changes. Jiří Máca

Table of Contents. Preface... 13

Seismic Analysis of Structures by TK Dutta, Civil Department, IIT Delhi, New Delhi.

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

Dynamics of Structures

Alireza Mehdipanah BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDINGS FEATURING TRANSFER BEAMS IN THE REGIONS OF LOW TO MODERATE SEISMICITY

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Software Verification

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Chapter 4 Analysis of a cantilever

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

[Hussain, 4(9): September 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Advanced Vibrations. Elements of Analytical Dynamics. By: H. Ahmadian Lecture One

midas Civil Dynamic Analysis

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

CIVL 8/7117 Chapter 12 - Structural Dynamics 1/75. To discuss the dynamics of a single-degree-of freedom springmass

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Contents i. Contents

IMPROVING LATERAL STIFFNESS ESTIMATION IN THE DIAGONAL STRUT MODEL OF INFILLED FRAMES

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

3. MDOF Systems: Modal Spectral Analysis

FORMULA FOR FORCED VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES USING STATIC FACTORED RESPONSE AS EQUIVALENT DYNAMIC RESPONSE

MODAL ANALYSIS OF PLANE FRAMES

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS BASICS:

A Mathematical Formulation to Estimate the Fundamental Period of High-Rise Buildings Including Flexural-Shear Behavior and Structural Interaction

DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES

Cork Institute of Technology. Summer 2007 Mechanics of Machines (Time: 3 Hours)

Theory and Practice of Rotor Dynamics Prof. Dr. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Structural Dynamics Prof. P. Banerji Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 1 Introduction

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

A Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Procedure Consistent with New Zealand Standards

APPLICATION OF RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD TO PASSIVELY DAMPED DOME STRUCTURE WITH HIGH DAMPING AND HIGH FREQUENCY MODES

Dynamics of structures

Influence of First Shape Factor in Behaviour of Rubber Bearings Base Isolated Buildings.

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

Stochastic Structural Dynamics Prof. Dr. C. S. Manohar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

VIBRATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Verification Examples. FEM-Design. version

The sensitivity analysis of the translation and the rotation angle of the first-order mode shape of the joints in frame structures

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

SPECIAL DYNAMIC SOIL- STRUCTURE ANALYSIS PROCEDURES DEMONSTATED FOR TWO TOWER-LIKE STRUCTURES

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane

Modal analysis of shear buildings

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses

DETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

Final Exam Solution Dynamics :45 12:15. Problem 1 Bateau

Comparison between Different Shapes of Structure by Response Spectrum Method of Dynamic Analysis

Grandstand Terraces. Experimental and Computational Modal Analysis. John N Karadelis

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING

Estimation of Natural Period based on Dynamic Analysis for Regular Structures with Shear Wall

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe

Influence of the Soil Structure Interaction on the Fundamental Period of Large Dynamic Machine Foundation

LANMARK UNIVERSITY OMU-ARAN, KWARA STATE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSE: MECHANICS OF MACHINE (MCE 322). LECTURER: ENGR.

STUDY ON MASS IRREGULARITY OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS

Structural Dynamics Lecture 7. Outline of Lecture 7. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.) System Reduction. Vibration due to Movable Supports.

Structural Matrices in MDOF Systems

Reduction in number of dofs

Selection of Rayleigh Damping Coefficients for Seismic Response Analysis of Soil Layers

Vertical acceleration and torsional effects on the dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

Some Aspects of Structural Dynamics

BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, Pilani Pilani Campus

Foundation Engineering Dr. Priti Maheshwari Department Of Civil Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Roorkee

CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM

1. Multiple Degree-of-Freedom (MDOF) Systems: Introduction

Transcription:

Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893 (Part 1) 00, regarding dynamic analysis are discussed using an example. The data for the example has been taken from SP Explanatory Handbook for IS 1893. Dynamic Analysis Dynamic analysis shall be performed to obtain the design seismic forces and its distribution to different levels along the height of building and to the various lateral load resisting elements in following cases: (1) Regular Building Greater than 40 m height in zone IV and V and those greater than 90 m in height in zone II and III. () Irregular building All framed buildings higher than 1 m in zone IV and V, and those greater than 40 m height in zone II and III. (3) For irregular building lesser than 40 m in height in zone II and III, dynamic analysis even though not mandatory, is recommended. Method of Dynamic Analysis: Buildings with regular, or nominally irregular plan configuration may be modeled as a system of masses lumped at floor levels with each mass having one degree of freedom, that of lateral displacement in the direction under consideration. Undamped free vibration analysis of entire building modeled as spring mass model shall be performed using appropriate masses and elastic stiffness of the structural system to obtain natural periods (T) and mode shapes {φ} of those of its modes of vibration that needs to be considered. The number of modes to be used should be such that the sum of total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90% of total seismic mass. In dynamic analysis following expressions shall be used for the computation of various quantities: (a) Modal mass (M k ) Modal mass of the structure subjected to horizontal or vertical as the case may be, ground motion is a part of the total seismic mass of the structure that is effective in mode k of vibration. The modal mass for a given mode has a unique value, irrespective of scaling of the mode shape. M k = (Σ W i φ ik ) /( g Σ W i φ ik ) Where g = acceleration due to gravity, φ ik = mode shape coefficient at floor i in mode k W i = Seismic weight of floor i. 1

(b) Modal Participation factor (P k ) Modal participation factor of mode k of vibration is the amount by which mode k contributes to the overall vibration of the structure under horizontal or vertical earthquake ground motions. Since the amplitudes of 95 percent mode shape can be scaled arbitrarily, the value of this factor depends on the scaling used for the mode shape. P k = (Σ W i φ ik ) /(Σ W i φ ik ) (c) Design lateral force at each floor in each mode The peak lateral force (Q ik ) at floor i in mode k is given by Q ik = A k φ ik P k W i Where A k = Design horizontal spectrum value using natural period of vibration (T k ) of mode k. = (Z I S a ) / ( R g) (d) Storey shear forces in each mode The peak shear force (V ik ) acting in storey i in mode k is given by V ik = Σ Q ik (e) Storey shear force due to all modes considered The peak storey shear force (V i ) in storey i due to all modes considered is obtained by combining those due to each mode as per following rules: (i) CQC method: The peak response quantities shall be combined as per Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC) method λ = r r Σ Σλ i ρ ij λ j 1 1 Where, r = Number of modes being considered, ρ ij = Cross-modal coefficient λ i = Response quantity in mode i including sign λ j = Response quantity in mode j including sign ρ ij = 8 ζ (1 + β) β 1.5 (1 - β ) + 4 ζ β (1 + β)

ζ = Modal damping ratio (in fraction) % and 5% for steel and reinforced concrete building respectively β = Frequency ratio = ω i /ω j ω i = Circular frequency in i th mode and ω j = Circular frequency in j th mode (ii) SRSS method : If the bulding does not have closely spaced modes, than the peak response quantity (λ) due to all modes considered shall be obtained as per Square Root of Sum of Square method r λ = Σ (λ k ) 1 Where λ k = Absolute value of quantity in mode k and r = Number of modes being considered Closely spaced modes of a structure are those of its natural modes of vibration whose natural frequencies differ from each other by 10 percent or less of the lower frequency. (iii) SAV: If the building has a few closely spaced modes, then the peak response quantity (λ* ) due to these modes shall be obtained as r λ* = Σ(λ k ) c Where the summation is for the closely spaced modes only. This peak response quantity due to the closely spaced modes (λ* ) is then combined with those of the remaining well separated modes by the method of SRSS. The analytical model for dynamic analysis with unusual configuration should be such that it adequately models the types of irregularities present in the building configuration. Building with plan irregularities like torsion irregularities, re-entrant corners, diaphragm discontinuity, out-of plane offset, non parallel systems as defined in IS 1893 can not be modeled for dynamic analysis as discussed above. The design base shear (V B ) shall be compared with base shear (V B ) calculated using a fundamental period T a, as given by empirical formula of clause 7.6 of IS 1893. Where V B is less than V B, all the response quantities shall be multiplied by V B /V B. To illustrate above procedure an example is solved as follows. 3

Example of Dynamic analysis as per IS 1893 (Part I) -00 Analyse a 15 storey RC building as shown in fig. The live load on all the floors is 00 kg/m and soil below the building is hard. The site lies in zone V. All the beams are of size 40 50 cm and slabs are 15 cm thick. The sizes of columns are 60 60 cm in all the storeys and wall alround is 1 cm thick. (Data from SP 198) Analysis of the building (a) Calculation of dead load, live load and storey stiffness: Dead loads and live loads at each floor are computed and lumped. Stiffness in a storey is lumped assuming all the columns to be acting in parallel with each column contributing stiffness corresponding to K c = 1EI/L 3, where I is the moment of inertia about bending axis, L is the column height, and E the elastic modulus of the column material. The total stiffness of storey is thus ΣK c. The lumped mass at all floor level is 5.43 (t-s /m) and at roof level is 40 (t-s /m). The values of I, K c and ΣK c for all the floors / storeys is 1.08 10 8 cm 4, 904 t/m and 180480 t/m, respectively. The value of modulus of elasticity of column material considered is 1880000 t/m. (b) The first three natural frequencies and the corresponding mode shape are determined using Stodola Vienello iteration procedure and are given in as below: Periods and modes shape coefficients at various levels for first three modes Mode No. 1 3 Period in seconds 1.04 0.348 0.10 Mode shape coefficient at various floor levels φ 1 0.037 0.108 0.175 φ 0.073 0.06 0.305 φ 3 0.108 0.85 0.356 φ 4 0.143 0.336 0.315 φ 5 0.175 0.356 0.19 φ 6 0.06 0.34 0.019 φ 7 0.35 0.96-0.158 φ 8 0.61 0. -0.96 φ 9 0.85 0.17-0.355 φ 10 0.305 0.019-0.34 φ 11 0.33-0.089-0.08 φ 1 0.336-0.190-0.039 φ 13 0.347-0.73 0.140 φ 14 0.353-0.330 0.83 φ 15 0.356-0.355 0.353 3 bays @ 7.5 m =.5m 15 storey @ 3 m = 45 m 4 bays @ 7.5 m = 30 m 4

(c) The next step is to obtain seismic forces at each floor level in each individual mode as per IS 1893 (i) Calculate mode participation factors P k = Σ W i φ ik / Σ W i φ ik (ii) Calculation of modal mass M k = (Σ W i φ ik ) /(g Σ W i φ ik ) (iii) Calculate design lateral force at each floor in each mode Q ik = A k φ ik P k W i A k is design horizontal spectrum value depending upon natural period of vibration (T k ) of mode k. (iv) Calculate storey shear force in each mode V ik = Σ Q ik (v) Calculate the storey shear forces due to all mode considered by combining those due to each mode as per clause 7.8.4.4 of IS 1893 As per CQC method λ = ( ΣΣλ i ρ ij λ j ) 1/ As per SRSS method λ = ( Σλ k ) 1/ As per SAV method λ = ( Σλ k ) These calculations are tabulated as below: Computation of mode participation factor P 1 Lateral force (Q i1 ) and shear force (V i1 ) for mode 1 Floor Weight Mode W i φ i1 W i φ i1 Q i1 = V i1 No. W i coefficientφ i1 A 1 φ i1 P 1 W i 1 514.34 0.037 19.030518 0.70419.348176 19.497345 514.34 0.073 37.546696.740909 4.63888 17.149170 3 514.34 0.108 55.548538 5.9994 6.854136 1.51681 4 514.34 0.143 73.550385 10.517706 9.075383 05.66140 5 514.34 0.175 90.00901 15.751610 11.10638 196.586761 6 514.34 0.06 105.953697 1.8646 13.07368 185.480530 7 514.34 0.35 10.869507 8.404333 14.914091 17.406906 8 514.34 0.61 134.4310 35.03743 16.564161 157.49813 9 514.34 0.85 146.58646 41.777130 18.087301 140.98650 10 514.34 0.305 156.873184 47.84631 19.356586 1.841354 11 514.34 0.33 166.13187 53.660408 0.498943 103.48477 1 514.34 0.336 17.817673 58.066738 1.33977 8.98585 13 514.34 0.347 178.475403 61.930965.0083 61.661846 14 514.34 0.353 181.561417 64.091179.40868 39.639763 15 39.40 0.356 139.694397 49.73105 17.36895 17.36895 Total 1778.89065 498.085571 Mode participation factor P 1 = Σ W i φ i1 / Σ W i φ i1 = 1778.89065 / 498.085571 = 3.571456 A 1 = (Z I S a ) / ( R g) 5

Z = 0.36 (zone V), I = 1.0, R = 5.0, S a /g = 1/1.04 = 0.9596 (for hard soil) A 1 = (0.36 1.0 0.9596) / ( 5.0) = 0.0345456 Modal mass = (Σ W i φ i1 ) / Σ W i φ i1 = (1778.89065) / 498.085571 = 6353.3 % of total mass = 6353.3/ 7593.16 = 83.67 % Computation of mode participation factor P Lateral force (Q i ) and shear force (V i ) for mode Floor Weight Mode W i φ i W i φ i Q i = V i No. W i coefficientφ i A φ i P W i 1 514.34 0.108 55.548538 5.9994 5.903646 6.543804 514.34 0.06 105.953697 1.8646 11.60656 56.640160 3 514.34 0.85 146.58646 41.777130 15.579063 45.379501 4 514.34 0.336 17.817673 58.066738 18.366896 9.800436 5 514.34 0.356 183.104446 65.185181 19.460165 11.433540 6 514.34 0.34 175.90370 60.159069 18.694878-8.0665 7 514.34 0.96 15.44141 45.06466 16.180361-6.7150 8 514.34 0. 114.183105 5.348650 1.13571-4.901863 9 514.34 0.17 65.30969 8.95763 6.9450-55.03713 10 514.34 0.019 9.7748 0.185676 1.038604-61.97938 11 514.34-0.089-45.77611 4.074074-4.865041-63.017986 1 514.34-0.190-97.7481 18.567614-10.386043-58.15946 13 514.34-0.73-140.414368 38.3331-14.93103-47.766903 14 514.34-0.330-169.731659 56.011448-18.038918-3.843800 15 39.40-0.355-139.301987 49.4506-14.80488-14.80488 Total 588.486694 498.346680 Mode participation factor P = Σ W i φ i / Σ W i φ i =588.486694 / 498.346680= 1.180878 A = (Z I S a ) / ( R g) Z = 0.36 (zone V), I = 1.0, R = 5.0, S a /g =.5 (for hard soil) A = (0.36 1.0.5) / ( 5.0) = 0.09 Modal mass = (Σ W i φ i ) / Σ W i φ i = (588.486694) / 498.346680= 694.91 % of total mass = 694.91/ 7593.16 = 9.15 % 6

Computation of mode participation factor P 3 Lateral force (Q i3 ) and shear force (V i3 ) for mode 3 Floor Weight Mode W i φ i3 W i φ i3 Q i3 = V i3 No. W i coefficientφ i3 A 3 φ i3 P 3 W i 1 514.34 0.175 90.00901 15.751610 5.631668 1.699989 514.34 0.305 156.873184 47.84631 9.815193 16.06831 3 514.34 0.356 183.104446 65.185181 11.4564 6.5319 4 514.34 0.315 16.016571 51.0351 10.13700-5.0393 5 514.34 0.19 98.75960 18.960569 6.178744-15.34095 6 514.34 0.019 9.7748 0.185676 0.611438-1.519039 7 514.34-0.158-81.65457 1.839943-5.08459 -.130478 8 514.34-0.96-15.44141 45.06466-9.55564-17.045887 9 514.34-0.355-18.590103 64.819481-11.4440-7.5034 10 514.34-0.34-166.645615 53.993179-10.46631 3.903916 11 514.34-0.08-106.98376.5335-6.693640 14.330547 1 514.34-0.039-0.059195 0.78309-1.55057 1.04187 13 514.34 0.140 7.00736 10.081031 4.505334.7945 14 514.34 0.83 145.557739 41.19841 9.10711 17.773911 15 39.40 0.353 138.517197 48.896568 8.666700 8.666700 Total 346.84188 498.886536 Mode participation factor P = Σ W i φ i3 / Σ W i φ i3 =346.84188 / 498.886536= 0.695197 A k = (Z I S a ) / ( R g) Z = 0.36 (zone V), I = 1.0, R = 5.0, S a /g =.5 (for hard soil) A k = (0.36 1.0.5) / ( 5.0) = 0.09 Modal mass = (Σ W i φ i3 ) / Σ W i φ i3 = (346.84188) / 498.886536= 41.37 % of total mass = 41.37/ 7593.16 = 3.18 % 7

Storey shear due to modes considered Floor No. V i1 V i V i3 SAV SRSS CQC 1 19.497345 6.543804 1.699989 303.741119 9.63397 9.911057 17.149170 56.640160 16.06831 89.857666 4.98909 5.53697 3 1.51681 45.379501 6.5319 64.14896 17.39763 17.745331 4 05.66140 9.800436-5.0393 40.665863 07.87509 08.07100 5 196.586761 11.433540-15.34095 3.360596 197.515579 197.51500 6 185.480530-8.0665-1.519039 15.06199 186.897095 186.8893 7 17.406906-6.7150 -.130478 1.58881 175.863403 175.76309 8 157.49813-4.901863-17.045887 17.440567 164.11917 163.973633 9 140.98650-55.03713-7.5034 03.486115 151.481110 151.30743 10 1.841354-61.97938 3.903916 188.74655 137.64694 137.33459 11 103.48477-63.017986 14.330547 180.833313 1.007080 11.43195 1 8.98585-58.15946 1.04187 16.16949 103.49103 10.803680 13 61.661846-47.766903.7945 131.707993 81.118584 80.450851 14 39.639763-3.843800 17.773911 90.57477 54.46043 53.949886 15 17.36895-14.80488 8.666700 40.708481 4.318855 4.07533 As per clause 7.8.4.4 of IS 1893, if the building does not have closely spaced modes, the peak response quantity due to all modes considered shall be obtained as per SRSS method. Closely spaced modes of the structure are those of its natural modes of vibration whose natural frequencies differ from each other by 10 percent or less of the lower frequency. In this example as shown below, the frequencies in each mode differ by more than 10%, so building is not having closely spaced modes and so, SRSS method can be used. Mode Time period Natural frequency π / T 1 1.04 6.03 0.348 18.06 3 0.10 9.9 The comparison of storey shear using SRSS method and CQC method is shown above. 8

As per clause 7.8. of IS 1893 the design base shear (V B ) shall be compared with base shear (V B ) calculated using a fundamental period T a. When V B is less than V B, all the response quantities (e.g. member forces, displacements, storey forces, storey shear and base reactions ) shall be multiplied by V B /V B. For this example T a = 0.075 h 0.75 for RC frame building T a = 0.075 (45) 0.75 = 1.3031 sec For hard soil S a /g = 1.00/T a = 1/1.3031 = 0.7674 V B = A h W W = 514.34 14 + 39.4 = 7593.16 A h = (Z I S a ) / ( R g) Z = 0.36 (for zone V) I = 1.0 R = 5.0 (considering SMRF) A h = (0.36 1 0.7674) / ( 5.0) = 0.076 Base shear V B = 0.076 7593.16 = 09.77 t Base shear from dynamic analysis V B = 9.9 t So, V B > V B, response quantities need not required to be modified. 9

Appendix: Procedure to calculate time period and mode shape factors In many structural system a number of independent displacement coordinates are required to describe the displacement of the mass of structure at any instant of the time. In order to simplify the solution, it is usually assumed that the mass of the structure is lumped at the centre of mass of the individual storey levels. This results in a diagonal matrix of mass properties in which translational mass is located on the main diagonal. It is also convenient to develop the structural stiffness matrix in terms of structural matrices of the individual storey level. This idealization is based on assumption: (i) Floor diaphragm is rigid in its own plane, (ii) the girders are rigid relative to column, (iii) the columns are flexible in horizontal direction but rigid in the vertical. Under these assumptions the building structure is idealized as having three dynamic degrees of freedom at each storey level: a translational degree of freedom in two orthogonal directions and a rotation about vertical axis through the centre of mass. For the simplest idealization, (building having symmetrical plan) each storey level has one translational degree of freedom. Then the stiffness matrix will have following form: Mass m 1 Stiffness k 1 Mass m Stiffness k Mass m 3 Stiffness k 3 Mass m n- Stiffness k n- Mass m n-1 Stiffness k n-1 Mass m n Stiffness k n 10

Mass matrix [M] = m 1 0 0. 0 0 0 0 m 0. 0 0 0 0 0 m 3. 0 0 0 0 m i. 0 0 0 0 m n- 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n k 1 -k 1 0 0 0 0...0 -k 1 k 1 +k k 0 0 0 0 0 -k k +k 3 k 3 0 0 0 Stiffness matrix [K] = 0.. 0 k i-1 k i-1 +k i ki 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 -k n- k n- +k n-1 k n-1 0. 0 0 -k n-1 k n Equation of motion for undamped free vibration of a multi degree of freedom system can be written in matrix form as [M] {y } + [k] {y} = {0} Since motion of a system in free vibration are simple harmonic, the displacement vector can be represented as {y} = {A} sinωt differentiating twice with respect to time results in {y } = - ω {y} Substituting in equation of motion ([K] ω [m]){y} = {0} 11

The classical solution to the above equation derives from the fact that in order for a set of homogeneous equation to have a non trivial solution, the determinant of the coefficient matrix must be zero: Det([K] ω [m]) = {0} Expanding the determinant by minors results in a polynomial of degree N, which is called frequency equation. The N roots of the polynomial represents the frequencies of the N modes of the vibration. The mode having lowest frequency ( largest time period) is called the first or fundamental mode. Once the frequencies are known they can be substituted one at a time into the equilibrium equation, which can be solved for relative amplitudes of motion for each of the displacements components in the particular mode of the vibration. To solve this eigen value problem for calculation of eigen values ( natural frequencies) and eigen vector (mode shape) for large size problem various computer aided techniques are to be used. Some of the methods for the solution of eigen value problem are as: (1) Vector iteration method Power method Inverse iteration method Forward iteration () Transformation methods Jacobi method Givens method Householder Q-R method (3) Approximate solution techniques Static condensation Dynamic condensation Rayleigh-Ritz method (4) Sub-space iteration method 1