A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection

Similar documents
COMBINATORICS OF RAMANUJAN-SLATER TYPE IDENTITIES

On the Ordinary and Signed Göllnitz-Gordon Partitions

COMBINATORICS OF RAMANUJAN-SLATER TYPE IDENTITIES. James McLaughlin Department of Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA

Partition Congruences in the Spirit of Ramanujan

Partition Identities

Partition of Integers into Distinct Summands with Upper Bounds. Partition of Integers into Even Summands. An Example

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 24 Jan 2017

ON THE SLACK EULER PAIR FOR VECTOR PARTITION

PARITY RESULTS FOR BROKEN k DIAMOND PARTITIONS AND (2k + 1) CORES

ON PARTITION FUNCTIONS OF ANDREWS AND STANLEY

A RESULT ON RAMANUJAN-LIKE CONGRUENCE PROPERTIES OF THE RESTRICTED PARTITION FUNCTION p(n, m) ACROSS BOTH VARIABLES

CONGRUENCES RELATED TO THE RAMANUJAN/WATSON MOCK THETA FUNCTIONS ω(q) AND ν(q)

Singular Overpartitions

SYLVESTER S WAVE THEORY OF PARTITIONS

CONGRUENCES RELATED TO THE RAMANUJAN/WATSON MOCK THETA FUNCTIONS ω(q) AND ν(q)

Compositions, Bijections, and Enumerations

GEOMETRY AND COMPLEXITY OF O HARA S ALGORITHM

Combinatorics, Modular Forms, and Discrete Geometry

FURTHER RESULTS FOR PARTITIONS INTO FOUR SQUARES OF EQUAL PARITY. Michael D. Hirschhorn and James A. Sellers

Michael D. Hirschhorn and James A. Sellers. School of Mathematics UNSW Sydney 2052 Australia. and

An Algebraic Identity of F.H. Jackson and its Implications for Partitions.

SOME CONGRUENCES FOR PARTITION FUNCTIONS RELATED TO MOCK THETA FUNCTIONS ω(q) AND ν(q) S.N. Fathima and Utpal Pore (Received October 13, 2017)

COMPOSITIONS, PARTITIONS, AND FIBONACCI NUMBERS

Research Article New Partition Theoretic Interpretations of Rogers-Ramanujan Identities

Polynomial analogues of Ramanujan congruences for Han s hooklength formula

The part-frequency matrices of a partition

CHARACTERIZING THE NUMBER OF m ARY PARTITIONS MODULO m Mathematics Subject Classification: 05A17, 11P83

Course : Algebraic Combinatorics

REFINEMENTS OF SOME PARTITION INEQUALITIES

INFINITELY MANY CONGRUENCES FOR BROKEN 2 DIAMOND PARTITIONS MODULO 3

congruences Shanghai, July 2013 Simple proofs of Ramanujan s partition congruences Michael D. Hirschhorn

Binary Partitions Revisited

ARITHMETIC PROPERTIES FOR HYPER M ARY PARTITION FUNCTIONS

The part-frequency matrices of a partition

A PERIODIC APPROACH TO PLANE PARTITION CONGRUENCES

q-pell Sequences and Two Identities of V. A. Lebesgue

On m-ary Overpartitions

PARTITIONS AND (2k + 1) CORES. 1. Introduction

SOME CONGRUENCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE EQUATION X α = X β IN CERTAIN FINITE SEMIGROUPS

A REFINEMENT OF THE ALLADI-SCHUR THEOREM

Some Restricted Plane partitions and Associated Lattice Paths S. Bedi Department of Mathematics, D.A.V College, Sector 10 Chandigarh , India

Ramanujan-type congruences for overpartitions modulo 16. Nankai University, Tianjin , P. R. China

C-COLOR COMPOSITIONS AND PALINDROMES

A COMBINATORIAL PROOF AND REFINEMENT OF A PARTITION IDENTITY OF SILADIĆ

Combinatorial Analysis of the Geometric Series

are the q-versions of n, n! and . The falling factorial is (x) k = x(x 1)(x 2)... (x k + 1).

Coloring Vertices and Edges of a Path by Nonempty Subsets of a Set

#A22 INTEGERS 17 (2017) NEW CONGRUENCES FOR `-REGULAR OVERPARTITIONS

The Kth M-ary Partition Function

A note on partitions into distinct parts and odd parts

Article 12 INTEGERS 11A (2011) Proceedings of Integers Conference 2009 RECURSIVELY SELF-CONJUGATE PARTITIONS

ANALOGUES OF THE TRIPLE PRODUCT IDENTITY, LEBESGUE S IDENTITY AND EULER S PENTAGONAL NUMBER THEOREM

Enumeration Problems for a Linear Congruence Equation

CONGRUENCES FOR GENERALIZED FROBENIUS PARTITIONS WITH AN ARBITRARILY LARGE NUMBER OF COLORS

Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for The award of the degree of. Masters of Science in Mathematics and Computing

Elementary proofs of congruences for the cubic and overcubic partition functions

Warm-up Quantifiers and the harmonic series Sets Second warmup Induction Bijections. Writing more proofs. Misha Lavrov

Integer Partitions: An Overview

Some congruences for Andrews Paule s broken 2-diamond partitions

CONGRUENCES MODULO SQUARES OF PRIMES FOR FU S k DOTS BRACELET PARTITIONS

A LATTICE POINT ENUMERATION APPROACH TO PARTITION IDENTITIES

Arithmetic Properties for a Certain Family of Knot Diagrams

Integer Partitions. Student ID: Tutor: Roman Kotecky\Neil O Connell April 22, 2015

Generalization of a few results in integer partitions

Ramanujan-type congruences for broken 2-diamond partitions modulo 3

Integer Partitions With Even Parts Below Odd Parts and the Mock Theta Functions

On an identity of Gessel and Stanton and the new little Göllnitz identities

Coloring Vertices and Edges of a Path by Nonempty Subsets of a Set

Euler s partition theorem and the combinatorics of l-sequences

Ramanujan-Slater Type Identities Related to the Moduli 18 and 24

PLANE PARTITIONS AMY BECKER, LILLY BETKE-BRUNSWICK, ANNA ZINK

THE METHOD OF WEIGHTED WORDS REVISITED

Arithmetic Relations for Overpartitions

Objective Type Questions

ARITHMETIC OF THE 13-REGULAR PARTITION FUNCTION MODULO 3

Stanton Graph Decompositions

Combinatorics of non-associative binary operations

N E W S A N D L E T T E R S

Quadratic Forms and Congruences for l-regular Partitions Modulo 3, 5 and 7. Tianjin University, Tianjin , P. R. China

ON CONGRUENCE PROPERTIES OF CONSECUTIVE VALUES OF P(N, M) Brandt Kronholm Department of Mathematics, University at Albany, Albany, New York, 12222

Generating Functions

1 Introduction 1. 5 Rooted Partitions and Euler s Theorem Vocabulary of Rooted Partitions Rooted Partition Theorems...

CONGRUENCES MODULO 2 FOR CERTAIN PARTITION FUNCTIONS

4-Shadows in q-series and the Kimberling Index

CONGRUENCES FOR BROKEN k-diamond PARTITIONS

Ramanujan-type Congruences for Broken 2-Diamond Partitions Modulo 3

arxiv: v2 [math.nt] 2 Aug 2017

Srinivasa Ramanujan Life and Mathematics

Solutions of Exam Coding Theory (2MMC30), 23 June (1.a) Consider the 4 4 matrices as words in F 16

An Involution for the Gauss Identity

IAP LECTURE JANUARY 28, 2000: THE ROGERS RAMANUJAN IDENTITIES AT Y2K

Math 4400 First Midterm Examination September 21, 2012 ANSWER KEY. Please indicate your reasoning and show all work on this exam paper.

Definition: Let S and T be sets. A binary relation on SxT is any subset of SxT. A binary relation on S is any subset of SxS.

ELEMENTARY PROOFS OF PARITY RESULTS FOR 5-REGULAR PARTITIONS

Congruences modulo high powers of 2 for Sloane s box stacking function

PARTITIONS WITH FIXED DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LARGEST AND SMALLEST PARTS

Rademacher-Type Formulas for Partitions and Overpartitions

THE NATURE OF PARTITION BIJECTIONS II. ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY. Introduction

Practice Exam 1 CIS/CSE 607, Spring 2009

Matrix compositions. Emanuele Munarini. Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di Milano

Transcription:

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.1/48 A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection Andrew Sills Georgia Southern University

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.2/48 joint work with James Sellers and Gary Mullen Penn State University Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 11(1) (2004) #R43

PARTITION definition A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.3/48 A partition λ of the integer n is a representation of n as an unordered sum of positive integers λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r = n.

PARTITION definition A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.3/48 A partition λ of the integer n is a representation of n as an unordered sum of positive integers λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r = n. Each summand λ i is called a part of the partition λ.

PARTITION definition A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.3/48 A partition λ of the integer n is a representation of n as an unordered sum of positive integers λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r = n. Each summand λ i is called a part of the partition λ. Often a canonical ordering of parts is imposed: λ 1 λ 2 λ r.

The Partitions of 6 A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.4/48 6 5 + 1 4 + 2 4 + 1 + 1 3 + 3 3 + 2 + 1 3+1+1+1 2+2+2 2+2+1+1 2+1+1+1+1 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1

Euler s partition identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.5/48

Euler s partition identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.6/48 The number of partitions of n into odd parts equals the number of partitions of n into distinct parts.

Euler s partition identity Example A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.7/48 Of the eleven partitions of 6, four of them have only odd parts: 5+1 3+3 3+1+1+1 1+1+1+1+1+1

Euler s partition identity Example A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.7/48 Of the eleven partitions of 6, four of them have only odd parts: 5+1 3+3 3+1+1+1 1+1+1+1+1+1 and four of them have distinct parts: 6 5 + 1 4 + 2 3 + 2 + 1.

Frequency Notation for Partitions A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.8/48 Any partition λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 + + λ r may be written in the form f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 + f 4 4 +...,

Frequency Notation for Partitions A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.8/48 Any partition λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 + + λ r may be written in the form or more briefly, as f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 + f 4 4 +..., {f 1,f 2,f 3,f 4,...}, where f i represents the number of appearances of the positive integer i in the partition.

Frequency Notation for Partitions A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.9/48 For example, the partition 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1

Frequency Notation for Partitions A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.10/48 For example, the partition 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 2 1 + 4 2 + 1 3 + 2 4 + 0 5 + 4 6 + 0 7 + 0 8 + 0 9

Frequency Notation for Partitions A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.11/48 For example, the partition 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 2 1 + 4 2 + 1 3 + 2 4 + 0 5 + 4 6 + 0 7 + 0 8 + 0 9 may be represented by the frequency sequence {2, 4, 1, 2, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,... }.

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.12/48 Thus each sequence {f i } i=1, where each f i is a nonnegative integer and only finitely many of the f i are nonzero, represents a partition of the integer i=1 if i.

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.13/48

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.14/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r odd parts.

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.14/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r odd parts. Rewrite λ in the form f 1 1 + f 3 3 + f 5 5 +.

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.14/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r odd parts. Rewrite λ in the form f 1 1 + f 3 3 + f 5 5 +. Replace each f i with its binary expansion + a i3 8 + a i2 4 + a i1 2 + a i0 1.

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.15/48 So, f 1 1 + f 3 3 + f 5 5 + f 7 7 +

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.16/48 So, f 1 1 + f 3 3 + f 5 5 + f 7 7 + = ( + a 1,3 8 + a 1,2 4 + a 1,1 2 + a 1,0 1) 1 +( + a 3,3 8 + a 3,2 4 + a 3,1 2 + a 3,0 1) 3 +( + a 5,3 8 + a 5,2 4 + a 5,1 2 + a 5,0 1) 5.

Glaisher s proof of Euler s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.17/48 So, f 1 1 + f 3 3 + f 5 5 + f 7 7 + = ( + a 1,3 8 + a 1,2 4 + a 1,1 2 + a 1,0 1) 1 +( + a 3,3 8 + a 3,2 4 + a 3,1 2 + a 3,0 1) 3 +( + a 5,3 8 + a 5,2 4 + a 5,1 2 + a 5,0 1) 5. = a 1,0 + 2a 1,1 + 3a 3,0 + 4a 1,2 + 5a 5,0 + 6a 3,1 + 7a 7,0 +... where each a i,j {0, 1}.

Euler s partition identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.18/48 The number of partitions of n into odd parts equals the number of partitions of n into distinct parts.

Euler s partition identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.19/48 The number of partitions of n into nonmultiples of 2 equals the number of partitions of n where no part appears more than once.

Glaisher s partition identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.20/48 The number of partitions of n into nonmultiples of m equals the number of partitions of n where no part appears more than m 1 times.

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.21/48

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.22/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r nonmultiples of m.

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.22/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r nonmultiples of m. Rewrite λ in the form where f i =0 if m i. f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 +,

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.22/48 Let λ 1 + λ 2 + + λ r be a partition λ of some positive integer n into r nonmultiples of m. Rewrite λ in the form where f i =0 if m i. f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 +, Replace each f i with its base m expansion + a i3 m 3 + a i2 m 2 + a i1 m + a i0 1.

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.23/48 So, f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 + f 4 4 +

Proof of Glaisher s identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.24/48 So, f 1 1 + f 2 2 + f 3 3 + f 4 4 + = ( + a 1,3 m 3 + a 1,2 m 2 + a 1,1 m + a 1,0 1) 1 +( + a 2,3 m 3 + a 2,2 m 2 + a 2,1 m + a 2,0 1) 2 +( + a 3,3 m 3 + a 3,2 m 2 + a 3,1 m + a 3,0 1) 3. where each 0 a i,j m 1.

Partition Ideals A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.25/48

Partition Ideals A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.26/48 Informal Definition A partition ideal C is a set of partitions such that for each λ C, if one or more parts is removed from λ, the resulting partition is also in C.

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.27/48

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.28/48 Let R 1 (n) denote the number of partitions of n into parts congruent to ±1 (mod 5).

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.28/48 Let R 1 (n) denote the number of partitions of n into parts congruent to ±1 (mod 5). Let R 2 (n) denote the number of partitions λ 1 + + λ r of n such that λ i λ i+1 2.

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.28/48 Let R 1 (n) denote the number of partitions of n into parts congruent to ±1 (mod 5). Let R 2 (n) denote the number of partitions λ 1 + + λ r of n such that λ i λ i+1 2. Then R 1 (n) = R 2 (n) for all n.

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.29/48

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.30/48 The partitions enumerated by R 1 (n) are those for which f i = 0 whenever i ±1 (mod 5).

The First Rogers-Ramanujan Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.30/48 The partitions enumerated by R 1 (n) are those for which f i = 0 whenever i ±1 (mod 5). The partitions enumerated by R 2 (n) are those for which f i + f i+1 1.

Minimal Bounding Sequence A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.31/48 Let the sequence {d C 1,d C 2,d C 3,...} be defined by d C j = sup f j, {f i } i=1 C

Minimal Bounding Sequence A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.31/48 Let the sequence {d C 1,d C 2,d C 3,...} be defined by d C j = sup f j, {f i } i=1 C each d i is a nonnegative integer or +.

Euler s Theorem Revisited A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.32/48 Let O denote the set of all partitions with only odd parts.

Euler s Theorem Revisited A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.32/48 Let O denote the set of all partitions with only odd parts. {d O j } j=1 = {, 0,, 0,, 0,... }

Euler s Theorem Revisited A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.32/48 Let O denote the set of all partitions with only odd parts. {d O j } j=1 = {, 0,, 0,, 0,... } Let D denote the set of all partitions with distinct parts.

Euler s Theorem Revisited A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.32/48 Let O denote the set of all partitions with only odd parts. {d O j } j=1 = {, 0,, 0,, 0,... } Let D denote the set of all partitions with distinct parts. {d D j } j=1 = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,... }.

Equivalent Partition Ideals A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.33/48 Let p(c,n) denote the number of partitions of an integer n in the partition ideal C.

Equivalent Partition Ideals A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.33/48 Let p(c,n) denote the number of partitions of an integer n in the partition ideal C. We say that two partition ideals C 1 and C 2 are equivalent, and write C 1 C 2, if p(c 1,n) = p(c 2,n) for all integers n.

Euler s Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.34/48 O D.

The Multiset Associated with a Partition Ideal of Order 1 A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.35/48 Define the multiset associated with C, M(C), as follows: M(C) := {j(d C j + 1) j Z + and d C j < }.

The Multiset Associated with a Partition Ideal of Order 1 A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.35/48 Define the multiset associated with C, M(C), as follows: M(C) := {j(d C j + 1) j Z + and d C j < }. Andrews proved C 1 C 2 if and only if M(C 1 ) = M(C 2 ).

The Multiset Associated with a Partition Ideal of Order 1 A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.36/48 M(O) = M(D) = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,... }

Partitions of Infinity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.37/48 MacMahon defined a partition of infinity to be a formal expression of the form (g 1 1) 1+(g 2 1) g 1 +(g 3 1) (g 1 g 2 )+(g 4 1) (g 1 g 2 g 3 )+... where each g i 2 or for some fixed k, g 1,g 2,g 3,...,g k 1 > 1, g k =, and g k+1 = g k+2 = g k+3 = = 1.

Partitions of Infinity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.38/48 Note that a partition of infinity may be thought of as a minimal bounding sequence for a partition ideal of order one with d 1 = g 1 1 d g1 = g 2 1 d g1 g 2 = g 3 1 d g1 g 2 g 3 = g 4 1. and d i = 0 if i {1,g 1,g 1 g 2,g 1 g 2 g 3,...}.

Partitions of Infinity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.39/48 If g i = m for all i, we have a minimal bounding sequence for the partition ideal of the base m expansion.

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.40/48 All partitions of infinity have generating function 1 1 q.

Given any partition ideal of order 1 C for which each term in the minimal bounding sequence is 0 or, A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.41/48

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.41/48 Given any partition ideal of order 1 C for which each term in the minimal bounding sequence is 0 or, and any equivalent partition ideal of order 1 C,

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.41/48 Given any partition ideal of order 1 C for which each term in the minimal bounding sequence is 0 or, and any equivalent partition ideal of order 1 C, there exists a collection of partitions of infinity which gives rise to a Glaisher-type bijection from C to C.

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.41/48 Given any partition ideal of order 1 C for which each term in the minimal bounding sequence is 0 or, and any equivalent partition ideal of order 1 C, there exists a collection of partitions of infinity which gives rise to a Glaisher-type bijection from C to C. Further, there is an explicit algorithm for finding the required partitions of infinity.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.42/48 Let C denote the set of partitions into parts not equal to 2, 9, 10, 12, 18 or 20.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.42/48 Let C denote the set of partitions into parts not equal to 2, 9, 10, 12, 18 or 20. Let C denote the set of partitions where the parts 1, 9, and 10 may appear at most once, 3 and 4 may appear at most twice, 2 may appear at most four times, and all other positive integers may appear without restriction.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.42/48 Let C denote the set of partitions into parts not equal to 2, 9, 10, 12, 18 or 20. Let C denote the set of partitions where the parts 1, 9, and 10 may appear at most once, 3 and 4 may appear at most twice, 2 may appear at most four times, and all other positive integers may appear without restriction. C C.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.43/48 d C j = { 0 if j {2, 9, 10, 12, 18, 20} otherwise. {d C j } j=1 = {1, 4, 2, 2,,,,, 1, 1,,,,,... }.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.43/48 d C j = { 0 if j {2, 9, 10, 12, 18, 20} otherwise. {d C j } j=1 = {1, 4, 2, 2,,,,, 1, 1,,,,,... }. Any partition of n in C can be written in the form 8 n = f 1 1 + f i i + f 11 11 + i=3 +f 19 19 + f i i, i=21 17 i=13 f i i where each f i is a nonnegative integer.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.44/48 Expand f 1 by the partition of infinity defined by g 1,1 = 2, g 1,2 = 5, g 1,3 = 2, g 1,4 =, g 1,k = 1 if k > 4.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.44/48 Expand f 1 by the partition of infinity defined by g 1,1 = 2, g 1,2 = 5, g 1,3 = 2, g 1,4 =, g 1,k = 1 if k > 4. Expand f 3 by the partition of infinity defined by g 3,1 = 3, g 3,2 = 2, g 3,3 =, g 3,k = 1 if k > 3.

An Inelegant Partition Identity A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.44/48 Expand f 1 by the partition of infinity defined by g 1,1 = 2, g 1,2 = 5, g 1,3 = 2, g 1,4 =, g 1,k = 1 if k > 4. Expand f 3 by the partition of infinity defined by g 3,1 = 3, g 3,2 = 2, g 3,3 =, g 3,k = 1 if k > 3. Expand f 4 by the partition of infinity defined by g 4,1 = 3, g 4,2 =, g 4,k = 1 if k > 2.

n = ( a1,0 (1) + a 1,1 (2) + a 1,2 (2 5) + a 1,3 (2 5 2) ) 1 + ( a 2,0 (1) + a 2,1 (3) + a 2,2 (3 2) ) 3 + ( a 4,0 (1) + a 4,1 (3) ) 4 + ( a 5,0 (1) ) 5 + ( a 6,0 (1) ) 6 + ( a 7,0 (1) ) 7 + ( a 8,0 (1) ) 8 + ( a 11,0 (1) ) 11. where 0 a j,k g j,k+1 1 = d jgj,1 g j,2...g j,k. A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.45/48

A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.46/48 Apply the distributive property to obtain n = a 1,0 (1) + a 1,1 (2) + a 1,2 (10) + a 1,4 (20) + a 2,0 (3) + a 2,1 (9) + a 2,2 (18) + a 4,0 (4) + a 4,1 (12) + a 5,0 (5) + a 6,0 (6) where, in particular,. a 1,0 1, a 1,1 4, a 1,2 2, a 2,0 2, a 2,1 1, a 4,0 2.

Canonical Bijections A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.47/48 Any C for which each term in {d C j } j=1 an M(C) with no repeated elements. is 0 or has

Canonical Bijections A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.47/48 Any C for which each term in {d C j } j=1 an M(C) with no repeated elements. is 0 or has If for some C, M(C ) has no repeated elements, it is equivalent to some C with minimal bounding sequence consisting of only 0 s and s.

Canonical Bijections A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.47/48 Any C for which each term in {d C j } j=1 an M(C) with no repeated elements. is 0 or has If for some C, M(C ) has no repeated elements, it is equivalent to some C with minimal bounding sequence consisting of only 0 s and s. This C maps bijectively to C via the Glaisher-type bijection where the role of the base m expansion is played by an appropriate partition of infinity.

Canonical Bijections A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.47/48 Any C for which each term in {d C j } j=1 an M(C) with no repeated elements. is 0 or has If for some C, M(C ) has no repeated elements, it is equivalent to some C with minimal bounding sequence consisting of only 0 s and s. This C maps bijectively to C via the Glaisher-type bijection where the role of the base m expansion is played by an appropriate partition of infinity. If C C and M(C ) = M(C ) has no repeated elements, there is a canonical bijection between them.

Further Canonical Bijections for Equivalent Partition Ideals A Generalization of the Euler-Glaisher Bijection p.48/48 Max Kanovich Professor of Computer Science Queen Mary, University of London