Relativistic effects in large-scale structure

Similar documents
Testing gravity. Camille Bonvin Kavli Institute for Cosmology and DAMTP Cambridge

Relativistic effects in large-scale structure

Propagation of gravitational waves in a inhomogeneous universe. Benasque 2017 Standard Sirens Camille Bonvin p. 1/19

Effect of weak lensing on GWs

CMB beyond a single power spectrum: Non-Gaussianity and frequency dependence. Antony Lewis

Synergistic cosmology across the spectrum

Theoretical Cosmology

Fluctuations of cosmic parameters in the local universe

Relativistic Structure Formation in the Universe

The impact of relativistic effects on cosmological parameter estimation

On the gravitational redshift of cosmological objects

Testing gravity on Large Scales

Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity

Cosmology. Introduction Geometry and expansion history (Cosmic Background Radiation) Growth Secondary anisotropies Large Scale Structure

Modified gravity as an alternative to dark energy. Lecture 3. Observational tests of MG models

Cross-Correlation of CFHTLenS Galaxy Catalogue and Planck CMB Lensing

What do we really know about Dark Energy?

Physical Cosmology 6/6/2016

Consistent Parameterization of Modified Gravity

Anisotropy in the CMB

Modified gravity. Kazuya Koyama ICG, University of Portsmouth

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Second Order CMB Perturbations

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

General Relativistic N-body Simulations of Cosmic Large-Scale Structure. Julian Adamek

Lecture 3+1: Cosmic Microwave Background

NeoClassical Probes. of the Dark Energy. Wayne Hu COSMO04 Toronto, September 2004

Cosmology with Galaxy bias

Rayleigh scattering:

BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS. Cosmological Parameters and You

Parameterizing. Modified Gravity. Models of Cosmic Acceleration. Wayne Hu Ann Arbor, May 2008

redshift surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto T. Sato (Hiroshima) G. Huetsi (UCL) 2. Redshift-space distortion

Cosmological information from large-scale structure

A Framework for. Modified Gravity. Models of Cosmic Acceleration. Wayne Hu EFI, November 2008

Testing gravity. Lam Hui Columbia University

3 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

non-linear structure formation beyond the Newtonian approximation: a post-friedmann approach

CONSTRAINTS AND TENSIONS IN MG CFHTLENS AND OTHER DATA SETS PARAMETERS FROM PLANCK, INCLUDING INTRINSIC ALIGNMENTS SYSTEMATICS.

Physics of the Large Scale Structure. Pengjie Zhang. Department of Astronomy Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Constraining Modified Gravity and Coupled Dark Energy with Future Observations Matteo Martinelli

2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I

The Dark Sector ALAN HEAVENS

Light Propagation in the Averaged Universe. arxiv:

Lensing by (the most) massive structures in the universe

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

Cosmology & CMB. Set2: Linear Perturbation Theory. Davide Maino

(x 2 + ξ 2 ) The integral in (21.02) is analytic, and works out to 2/ξ 2. So. v = 2GM ξc

CONSTRAINTS AND TENSIONS IN MG CFHTLENS AND OTHER DATA SETS PARAMETERS FROM PLANCK, INCLUDING INTRINSIC ALIGNMENTS SYSTEMATICS. arxiv:1501.

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

Examining the Viability of Phantom Dark Energy

Modified Gravity and Cosmology

CMB studies with Planck

Gravity at the Horizon

Cosmic Acceleration from Modified Gravity: f (R) A Worked Example. Wayne Hu

TESTING GRAVITY WITH COSMOLOGY

Weak Lensing: a Probe of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay)

ITP, Universität Heidelberg Jul Weak Lensing of SNe. Marra, Quartin & Amendola ( ) Quartin, Marra & Amendola ( ) Miguel Quartin

Gauge-Invariant Formalism of Cosmological Weak Lensing

Chapter 9. Perturbations in the Universe

New Probe of Dark Energy: coherent motions from redshift distortions Yong-Seon Song (Korea Institute for Advanced Study)

Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy ad Cosmology

Ay1 Lecture 17. The Expanding Universe Introduction to Cosmology

Astro 448 Lecture Notes Set 1 Wayne Hu

Toward Higher Accuracy: A CDM Example

Redshift Space Distortion Introduction

Is inflation really necessary in a closed Universe? Branislav Vlahovic, Maxim Eingorn. Please see also arxiv:

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

Gravitation: Cosmology

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

Chapter 4. COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATION THEORY

The flickering luminosity method

Theory of Cosmological Perturbations

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

Anisotropic signatures in cosmic structures from primordial tensor perturbations

The Silk Damping Tail of the CMB l. Wayne Hu Oxford, December 2002

Wide-angle effects in future galaxy surveys

Esra Russell New York University Abu Dhabi Collaboration with C. Battal-Kilinc & O. Pashaev EWASS 2015, Tenerife, Spain, 22 June 2015

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation VII December 2017

Shant Baghram. Séminaires de l'iap. IPM-Tehran 13 September 2013

PROBLEM SET 10 (The Last!)

Primordial and Doppler modulations with Planck Antony Lewis On behalf of the Planck collaboration

Gravity and action at a distance

Measuring Gravitational Redshifts in Galaxy Clusters (arxiv:1303:3663)

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 23 Dec 1999 Abstract

Cosmological neutrinos

Lecture 2: Cosmological Background

Correlations between the Cosmic Microwave Background and Infrared Galaxies

A FIGURE OF MERIT ANALYSIS OF CURRENT CONSTRAINTS ON TESTING GENERAL RELATIVITY USING THE LATEST COSMOLOGICAL DATA SETS.

The Power. of the Galaxy Power Spectrum. Eric Linder 13 February 2012 WFIRST Meeting, Pasadena

Secondary Polarization

BAO analysis from the DR14 QSO sample

Uniformity of the Universe

Microwave Background Polarization: Theoretical Perspectives

Cosmology (Cont.) Lecture 19

Cosmological Structure Formation Dr. Asa Bluck

An Acoustic Primer. Wayne Hu Astro 448. l (multipole) BOOMERanG MAXIMA Previous COBE. W. Hu Dec. 2000

Fisher Matrix Analysis of the Weak Lensing Spectrum

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Examining the Viability of Phantom Dark Energy

Transcription:

Relativistic effects in large-scale structure Camille Bonvin Kavli Institute for Cosmology and DAMTP Cambridge Benasque August 2014

Outline How do relativistic effects distort our observables? Effect on: the galaxy number counts the convergence κ(or magnification) How can we measure relativistic effects? We can isolate these effects by looking at anti-symmetries in the correlation function. How can we use them to test gravity? Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 2 /32

Galaxy survey We want to measure fluctuations in the distribution of galaxies. We pixelise the map. We count the number of galaxies per pixel: = N N N Question: what are the effects contributing to? Credit: M. Blanton, SDSS Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 3 /32

Galaxy survey We want to measure fluctuations in the distribution of galaxies. We pixelise the map. We count the number of galaxies per pixel: = N N N Question: what are the effects contributing to? Credit: M. Blanton, SDSS Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 4 /32

Galaxy number counts We observe (z,n) = N(z,n) N(z) N(z) N(z,n) = ρ(z,n)v(z,n) and N = ρ(z) V(z) = ρ(z,n) V(z,n) ρ(z) V(z) ρ(z) V(z) (z,n) = b δ(z,n)+ δv(z,n) V 3 δz 1+z Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 5 /32

Galaxy number counts We observe (z,n) = N(z,n) N(z) N(z) N(z,n) = ρ(z,n)v(z,n) and N = ρ(z) V(z) ρ = ρ+δρ V = V +δv z = z +δz = ρ(z,n) V(z,n) ρ(z) V(z) ρ(z) V(z) (z,n) = b δ(z,n)+ δv(z,n) V 3 δz 1+z Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 6 /32

Galaxy number counts We observe (z,n) = N(z,n) N(z) N(z) N(z,n) = ρ(z,n)v(z,n) and same redshift bin different physical volume ρ = ρ+δρ = V = V +δv ρ(z,n) V(z,n) ρ(z) V(z) ρ(z) V(z) Observer dzdω (z,n) = b δ(z,n)+ δv(z,n) V 3 δz 1+z Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 7 /32

Galaxy number counts We observe (z,n) = N(z,n) N(z) N(z) N(z,n) = ρ(z,n)v(z,n) and same solid angle different physical volume ρ = ρ+δρ = V = V +δv ρ(z,n) V(z,n) ρ(z) V(z) ρ(z) V(z) Observer dzdω (z,n) = b δ(z,n)+ δv(z,n) V 3 δz 1+z Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 8 /32

Galaxy number counts We observe (z,n) = N(z,n) N(z) N(z) N(z,n) = ρ(z,n)v(z,n) and same radial bin different distance ρ = ρ+δρ = V = V +δv ρ(z,n) V(z,n) ρ(z) V(z) ρ(z) V(z) Observer dzdω (z,n) = b δ(z,n)+ δv(z,n) V 3 δz 1+z Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 9 /32

Fluctuations Perturbed Friedmann universe: ds 2 = a 2[ ( 1+2Ψ ) dη 2 + ( 1 2Φ ) δ ij dx i dx j] galaxy n µ We follow the propagation of photons from the galaxies to the observer and calculate: Changes in energy Observer Changes in direction Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 10/32

Result density redshift space distortion Yoo et al (2010) CB and Durrer (2011) Challinor and Lewis (2011) (z,n) = b D 1 H r(v n) Doppler + r 0 ( dr r r rr Ω (Φ+Ψ) 1 Ḣ H 2 2 rh ) lensing V n+ 1 H V n+ 1 H rψ r +Ψ 2Φ+ 1 H Φ 3 H k V + 2 dr (Φ+Ψ) r 0 ( ) [ Ḣ + H 2 + 2 r ] Ψ+ dr ( Φ+ rh Ψ) 0 gravitational redshift potential Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 11/32

Result standard expression Yoo et al (2010) CB and Durrer (2011) Challinor and Lewis (2011) (z,n) = b D 1 H r(v n) + r 0 ( dr r r rr Ω (Φ+Ψ) 1 Ḣ H 2 2 rh ) lensing: important at high z V n+ 1 H V n+ 1 H rψ r +Ψ 2Φ+ 1 H Φ 3 H k V + 2 dr (Φ+Ψ) r 0 ( ) [ Ḣ + H 2 + 2 r ] Ψ+ dr ( Φ+ rh Ψ) 0 relativistic contributions: important at large scale ( H k H k D ) 2 D Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 12/32

Convergence Galaxy surveys observe also the shape and the luminosity of galaxies measure of the convergence. The convergence κmeasures distortions in the size. The shear γmeasures distortions in the shape. Relativistic distortions affect the convergence at linear order. We solve Sachs equation D 2 δx α (λ) Dλ 2 = R α βµνk β k µ δx ν Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 13/32

Gravitational lensing κ = 1 2r 1 r + r 0 r 0 Convergence Doppler lensing ( ) dr r r 1 r Ω (Φ+Ψ)+ rh 1 V n ( dr (Φ+Ψ)+ 1 1 ) r dr ( Φ+ rh Ψ) 0 ) Ψ+Φ ( 1 1 rh Sachs Wolfe CB (2008) Bolejko et al (2013) Bacon et al (2014) Integrated terms Doppler lensing The moving galaxy is further away it looks smaller, i.e. demagnified Observer Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 14/32

Observations Due to relativistic effects, and κcontain additional information. δ,v,φ,ψ (Φ+Ψ),V,Φ,Ψ This can help testing gravity by probing the relation between density, velocity and gravitational potentials. Two difficulties: The relativistic effects are small: we need to go to large scales. We always measure the sum of all the effects. We need a way of isolating relativistic effects look for anti-symmetries in the correlation function. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 15/32

Density The density contribution = b δ, generates an isotropic correlation function. x x s ξ(s) = (x) (x ) the separation depends only on s = x x n Observer ξ(s) = Ab2 D 2 1 2π 2 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 0 (k s) Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 16/32

Density The density contribution = b δ, generates an isotropic correlation function. ξ(s) = (x) (x ) the separation depends only on s = x x s x x n Observer ξ(s) = Ab2 D 2 1 2π 2 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 0 (k s) Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 17/32

Redshift distortions Redshift distortions break the isotropy of the correlation function. Real space Redshift space Quadrupole = b δ 1 H r(v n) Hamilton (1992) n Observer n Observer ξ 2 = D 2 1 µ 2 (s) = A 2π 2 ( ) 4fb 3 + 4f2 µ 2 (s)p 2 (cosβ) 7 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 2 (k s) P2 cosβ P 2 (cosβ) = 3 2 cos2 β 1 2 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0 45 90 135 180 Β Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 18/32

Redshift distortions Redshift distortions break the isotropy of the correlation function. x β s x = b δ 1 H r(v n) Quadrupole Hamilton (1992) Observer n ξ 2 = D 2 1 µ 2 (s) = A 2π 2 ( ) 4fb 3 + 4f2 µ 2 (s)p 2 (cosβ) 7 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 2 (k s) P2 cosβ P 2 (cosβ) = 3 2 cos2 β 1 2 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0 45 90 135 180 Β Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 19/32

Redshift distortions Redshift distortions break the isotropy of the correlation function. x β s x = b δ 1 H r(v n) Hexadecapole ξ 4 = D 2 1 µ 4 (s) = A 2π 2 Hamilton (1992) 8f 2 35 µ 4(s)P 4 (cosβ) dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 4 (k s) Observer n P 4 (cosβ) = 1 8 P4 cosβ 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 [ ] 35cos 4 β 30cos 2 β +3 0 45 90 135 180 Β Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 20/32

Redshift distortions ξ 0 (s) = 1 2 = b δ 1 H r(v n) ξ 2 (s) = 5 dµ ξ(s,µ)p 2 (µ) 2 ξ 4 (s) = 9 2 1 1 1 1 1 Hamilton (1992) 1 dµ ξ(s,µ) dµ ξ(s,µ)p 4 (µ) 1.0 x β Observer n s x Measure separately: and b σ 8 f σ 8 f = dlnd 1 dlna µ = cosβ µ 4 (s) = A 2π 2 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T 2 δ(k)j 4 (k s) P4 cosβ 0.5 0.0 0.5 0 45 90 135 180 Β Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 21/32

Relativistic effects The relativistic effects break the symmetry of the correlation function. x x The correlation function differs for galaxies behind or in front of the central one. Observer n This differs from the breaking of isotropy, due to redshift distortions, which is symmetric. To measure the asymmetry, we need two populations of galaxies: faint and bright. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 22/32

Relativistic effects The relativistic effects break the symmetry of the correlation function. The correlation function differs for galaxies behind or in front of the central one. x x Observer n This differs from the breaking of isotropy, due to redshift distortions, which is symmetric. To measure the asymmetry, we need two populations of galaxies: faint and bright. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 23/32

Relativistic effects The relativistic effects break the symmetry of the correlation function. B F The correlation function differs for galaxies behind or in front of the central one. F Observer n This differs from the breaking of isotropy, due to redshift distortions, which is symmetric. To measure the asymmetry, we need two populations of galaxies: faint and bright. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 24/32

Cross-correlation The following terms break the symmetry: rel = 1 H rψ+ ( 1 Ḣ H 2 2 rh ) V n+ 1 H V n Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 25/32

Dipole in the correlation function CB, Hui and Gaztanaga (2013) ξ(s,β) = D 2 1f H H 0 ( Ḣ H 2 + 2 rh ) (b B b F )ν 1 (s) cos(β) B β F ν 1 (s) = A 2π 2 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T δ (k)t Ψ (k)j 1 (k s) Observer n By fitting for a dipole in the correlation function, we can measure relativistic effects, and separate them from the density and redshift space distortions. ξ 1 (s) = 3 2 1 1 dµ ξ(s,µ) µ µ = cosβ Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 26/32

120 z = 0.25 Monopole Multipoles 0 Quadrupole 100 80 20 s 2 Ξ 0 60 40 s 2 Ξ 2 40 20 60 0 20 80 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200 s Mpc h s Mpc h 8 Hexadecapole 2.0 Dipole 6 1.5 s 2 Ξ 4 4 s 2 Ξ 1 1.0 2 0.5 0 50 100 150 200 0.0 50 100 150 200 s Mpc h s Mpc h Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 27/32

κ g = 1 2r r 0 Convergence dr r r r Ω (Φ+Ψ) κ v = ( ) 1 rh 1 V n We can isolate the Doppler lensing by looking for anti-symmetries in κ redshift space κ κ real space κ κ demagnified magnified Observer n Observer n Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 28/32

Dipole CB, Bacon, Clarkson, Andrianomena and Maartens (in preparation) β κ s 2 Ξ 1 ξ(s,β) = 2A 9π 2 Ω 2 D1 2 m 0 2 4 6 8 10 H H 0 f ( 1 1 )( b+ 3f Hr 5 z = 0.1 z = 0.5 Gravitational lensing Doppler lensing 50 100 150 200 s Mpc h ) ν 1 (s)cos(β) Observer n 50 100 150 200 The dipole due to gravitational lensing is completely subdominant. s 2 Ξ 1 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Gravitational lensing Doppler lensing s Mpc h Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 29/32

Testing Euler equation The monopole and quadrupole in allow to measure V The dipole allows to measure: rel = 1 H rψ+ ( 1 Ḣ H 2 2 rh ) V n+ 1 H V n If Euler equation is valid: rel = V n+hv n+ r Ψ = 0 ( Ḣ H 2 + 2 rh ) V n With the dipole, we can test Euler equation. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 30/32

Measuring the anisotropic stress The dipole in the convergence is sensitive to: The standard part κ v = ( ) 1 rh 1 κ g = 1 2r r can be measure through κκ and 0 V n dr r r r Ω (Φ+Ψ) γγ Assuming Euler equation, we can test the relation between the two metric potentials Φand Ψ. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 31/32

Conclusion Our observables are affected by relativistic effects. These effects have a different signature in the correlation function: they induce anti-symmetries. By measuring these anti-symmetries we can isolate the relativistic effects and use them to test the relations between the density, velocity and gravitational potential. Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 32/32

Contamination The density and velocity evolve with time: the density of the faint galaxies in front of the bright is larger than the density behind. This also induces a dipole in the correlation function. F Larger redshift smaller density 2 1 relativistic B s 2 Ξ 1 0 total F Observer n 1 2 evolution 50 100 150 200 s Mpc h Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 33/32

Dipole in the correlation function ξ(s,β) = D 2 1f H H 0 ( Ḣ H 2 + 2 rh ) (b B b F )ν 1 (s) cos(β) B β F ν 1 (s) = A 2π 2 dk k ( k H 0 ) ns 1 T δ (k)t Ψ (k)j 1 (k s) 2.0 Observer n 1.5 z = 0.25 s 2 Ξ 1 1.0 0.5 z = 0.5 z = 1 0.0 CB, Hui and Gaztanaga (2013) 50 100 150 200 s Mpc h b B b F 0.5 Benasque Camille Bonvin p. 34/32