Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Systems of Nonlinear Coupled Equations

Similar documents
Variational Iteration Method for Solving Nonlinear Coupled Equations in 2-Dimensional Space in Fluid Mechanics

Exact Solutions for Systems of Volterra Integral Equations of the First Kind by Homotopy Perturbation Method

Homotopy perturbation method for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations

Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Partial Differential Equations of Fractional Order

The variational homotopy perturbation method for solving the K(2,2)equations

Application of He s homotopy perturbation method to boundary layer flow and convection heat transfer over a flat plate

Homotopy Perturbation Method for the Fisher s Equation and Its Generalized

Homotopy Perturbation Method for Computing Eigenelements of Sturm-Liouville Two Point Boundary Value Problems

Soliton solution of the Kadomtse-Petviashvili equation by homotopy perturbation method

The Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving the Modified Korteweg-de Vries Equation

HOMOTOPY PERTURBATION METHOD FOR SOLVING THE FRACTIONAL FISHER S EQUATION. 1. Introduction

ALGORITHMS FOR NONLINEAR FRACTIONAL PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS: A SELECTION OF NUMERICAL METHODS. Shaher Momani Zaid Odibat Ishak Hashim

The Homotopy Perturbation Method for free vibration analysis of beam on elastic foundation

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 18/2009 NEW ITERATIVE METHODS FOR SOLVING NONLINEAR EQUATIONS BY USING MODIFIED HOMOTOPY PERTURBATION METHOD

New interpretation of homotopy perturbation method

The Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving the Kuramoto Sivashinsky Equation

Homotopy perturbation method for the Wu-Zhang equation in fluid dynamics

The Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) for Nonlinear Parabolic Equation with Nonlocal Boundary Conditions

Analysis of Fractional Nonlinear Differential Equations Using the Homotopy Perturbation Method

Research Article Note on the Convergence Analysis of Homotopy Perturbation Method for Fractional Partial Differential Equations

The Modified Adomian Decomposition Method for. Solving Nonlinear Coupled Burger s Equations

On Using the Homotopy Perturbation Method for Finding the Travelling Wave Solutions of Generalized Nonlinear Hirota- Satsuma Coupled KdV Equations

Conformable variational iteration method

Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving the Second Kind of Non-Linear Integral Equations. 1 Introduction and Preliminary Notes

SOLUTION OF TROESCH S PROBLEM USING HE S POLYNOMIALS

Comparison of Homotopy-Perturbation Method and variational iteration Method to the Estimation of Electric Potential in 2D Plate With Infinite Length

Analytical Solution to Intra-Phase Mass Transfer in Falling Film Contactors via Homotopy Perturbation Method

On the Homotopy Perturbation Method and the Adomian Decomposition Method for Solving Abel Integral Equations of the Second Kind

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 20/2009 AN EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR SOLVING FRACTIONAL INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Wen-Hua Wang

The comparison of optimal homotopy asymptotic method and homotopy perturbation method to solve Fisher equation

HOMOTOPY PERTURBATION METHOD TO FRACTIONAL BIOLOGICAL POPULATION EQUATION. 1. Introduction

SOLVING THE KLEIN-GORDON EQUATIONS VIA DIFFERENTIAL TRANSFORM METHOD

Comparison of Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Method with Homotopy Perturbation Method of Twelfth Order Boundary Value Problems

Application of Homotopy Perturbation Method in Nonlinear Heat Diffusion-Convection-Reaction

On Solutions of the Nonlinear Oscillators by Modified Homotopy Perturbation Method

On the Numerical Solutions of Heston Partial Differential Equation

An Analytic Study of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

He s Homotopy Perturbation Method for Nonlinear Ferdholm Integro-Differential Equations Of Fractional Order

Solving a class of linear and non-linear optimal control problems by homotopy perturbation method

Abdolamir Karbalaie 1, Hamed Hamid Muhammed 2, Maryam Shabani 3 Mohammad Mehdi Montazeri 4

Application of Homotopy Perturbation and Modified Adomian Decomposition Methods for Higher Order Boundary Value Problems

Solution of an anti-symmetric quadratic nonlinear oscillator by a modified He s homotopy perturbation method

Analytical solution for determination the control parameter in the inverse parabolic equation using HAM

Research Article Free Vibration Analysis of an Euler Beam of Variable Width on the Winkler Foundation Using Homotopy Perturbation Method

A New Numerical Scheme for Solving Systems of Integro-Differential Equations

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 2 (1) (2009) Research Article

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Solution of Differential Equations of Lane-Emden Type by Combining Integral Transform and Variational Iteration Method

On the coupling of Homotopy perturbation method and Laplace transformation

Solving nonlinear fractional differential equation using a multi-step Laplace Adomian decomposition method

Exact Solutions of Fractional-Order Biological Population Model

Homotopy perturbation and Elzaki transform for solving Sine-Gorden and Klein-Gorden equations

Numerical Solution of the (2+1)-Dimensional Boussinesq Equation with Initial Condition by Homotopy Perturbation Method

LOWELL JOURNAL. MUST APOLOGIZE. such communication with the shore as Is m i Boimhle, noewwary and proper for the comfort

Variational Iteration Method for a Class of Nonlinear Differential Equations

Exact Solution of Some Linear Fractional Differential Equations by Laplace Transform. 1 Introduction. 2 Preliminaries and notations

Approximate Closed-form Solutions for a System of Coupled Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations: Brusselator Model.

On the convergence of the homotopy analysis method to solve the system of partial differential equations

Shiraz University of Technology. From the SelectedWorks of Habibolla Latifizadeh. Habibolla Latifizadeh, Shiraz University of Technology

MULTISTAGE HOMOTOPY ANALYSIS METHOD FOR SOLVING NON- LINEAR RICCATI DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Dynamic Response and Oscillating Behaviour of Fractionally Damped Beam

Numerical Solution of 12 th Order Boundary Value Problems by Using Homotopy Perturbation Method

A new modification to homotopy perturbation method for solving Schlömilch s integral equation

The Modified Variational Iteration Method for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations

Homotopy Analysis Transform Method for Time-fractional Schrödinger Equations

Solution of Linear and Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations by Combine Elzaki Transform and Homotopy Perturbation Method

Approximate Solution of an Integro-Differential Equation Arising in Oscillating Magnetic Fields Using the Differential Transformation Method

V. G. Gupta 1, Pramod Kumar 2. (Received 2 April 2012, accepted 10 March 2013)

A Study On Linear and Non linear Schrodinger Equations by Reduced Differential Transform Method

Application of Variational Iteration Method to a General Riccati Equation

Research Article Application of Homotopy Perturbation and Variational Iteration Methods for Fredholm Integrodifferential Equation of Fractional Order

Application of homotopy perturbation method to non-homogeneous parabolic partial and non linear differential equations

Comparison of homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method through an evolution equation

Analytical Solution of BVPs for Fourth-order Integro-differential Equations by Using Homotopy Analysis Method

Homotopy Analysis Method for Nonlinear Jaulent-Miodek Equation

Application of HPM for determination of an unknown function in a semi-linear parabolic equation Malihe Rostamian 1 and Alimardan Shahrezaee 1 1,2

Computers and Mathematics with Applications. A modified variational iteration method for solving Riccati differential equations

Application of He s Amplitude - Frequency. Formulation for Periodic Solution. of Nonlinear Oscillators

Differential transformation method for solving one-space-dimensional telegraph equation

Complex Variables. Chapter 2. Analytic Functions Section Harmonic Functions Proofs of Theorems. March 19, 2017

EffectofVariableThermalConductivityHeatSourceSinkNearaStagnationPointonaLinearlyStretchingSheetusingHPM

Numerical Simulation of the Generalized Hirota-Satsuma Coupled KdV Equations by Variational Iteration Method

Exact traveling wave solutions of nonlinear variable coefficients evolution equations with forced terms using the generalized.

The Existence of Noise Terms for Systems of Partial Differential and Integral Equations with ( HPM ) Method

On The Exact Solution of Newell-Whitehead-Segel Equation Using the Homotopy Perturbation Method

International Journal of Modern Mathematical Sciences, 2012, 3(2): International Journal of Modern Mathematical Sciences

Variational iteration method for fractional heat- and wave-like equations

Approximate Analytical Solutions of Two. Dimensional Transient Heat Conduction Equations

Computers and Mathematics with Applications. A new application of He s variational iteration method for the solution of the one-phase Stefan problem

Rational Energy Balance Method to Nonlinear Oscillators with Cubic Term

Soliton solutions of Hirota equation and Hirota-Maccari system

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 15 Mar 2012

Biological population model and its solution by reduced differential transform method

Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Twelfth Order Boundary Value Problems

A robust uniform B-spline collocation method for solving the generalized PHI-four equation

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 16 Oct 2014

EXACT TRAVELING WAVE SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR FRACTIONAL PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS USING THE IMPROVED (G /G) EXPANSION METHOD

Solution of Nonlinear Fractional Differential. Equations Using the Homotopy Perturbation. Sumudu Transform Method

2 One-dimensional differential transform

Transcription:

Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol 6, 2012, no 96, 4787-4800 Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Systems of Nonlinear Coupled Equations A A Hemeda Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt aahemeda@yahoocom Abstract In recent years, many more of the numerical methods were used to solve a wide range of mathematical, physical and engineering problems linear and nonlinear In this article, we shall use the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) to solve some systems of partial differential equations viz the systems of coupled Burgers equations in one- and two- dimensions and the system of Laplace s equation This article, confirms the power, simplicity and efficiency of the method compared with more of the other methods, also confirms that this method is a suitable method for solving any partial differential equations or systems of partial differential equations as well Keywords: Homotopy perturbation method; Coupled Burgers equations; Laplace s equation; Partial differential equations 1 Introduction The HPM, proposed first by Ji-Huan He [1,2], for solving differential and integral equations, linear and nonlinear, has been the subject of extensive analytical and numerical studies The method, which is a coupling of the traditional perturbation method and homotopy in topology, deforms continuously to a simple problem which is easily solved This method, which does not require a small parameter in an equation, has a significant advantage in that provides an analytical approximate solution to a wide range of linear and nonlinear problems in applied sciences The HPM is applied to Volterra s integro-differential equation [3], nonlinear oscillators [4], bifurcation of nonlinear problems [5], bifurcation of delay-differential equations [6], nonlinear wave equations [7], boundary value problems [8] and to other fields [9-17] The HPM yields a very rapid convergence of the solution series in most cases, usually only a few

4788 A A Hemeda iterations leading to very accurate solutions Thus, He s HPM is a universal one which can solve various kinds of linear and nonlinear equations The aim of this article is to extend the application of the He s HPM to solve linear and nonlinear systems of partial differential equations such as the systems of coupled Burgers equations in one- and two- dimension and the system of Laplace s equation The obtained results confirms the power, simple and easy of the method to implement In the following we shall illustrate the HPM introduced by He [1,2] and a modification algorithm of the HPM introduced by Momani [18] 2 Homotopy perturbation method To achieve our goal, we consider the following nonlinear differential equation [1-18]: with the boundary conditions: L(u)+N(u) =f(r), r Ω, (1) B ( u, u ) =0, r Γ, (2) n where L is a linear operator, N is a nonlinear operator, B is a boundary operator, Γ is the boundary of the domain Ω and f(r) is a known analytic function By the homotopy perturbation technique [1,2], He construct a homotopy: v(r, p) :Ω [0, 1] R which satisfies: or H(v, p) =(1 p)[l(v) L(u 0 )] + p [L(v)+N(v) f(r)] = 0, (3) H(v, p) =L(v) L(u 0 )+pl(u 0 )+p [N(v) f(r)] = 0, (4) where r Ω, p [0, 1] is an impeding parameter and u 0 is an initial approximation which satisfies the boundary conditions Obviously, from Eqs (3) and (4), we have: H(v, 0) = L(v) L(u 0 )=0, (5)

Homotopy perturbation method 4789 H(v, 1) = L(v)+N(v) f(r) =0 (6) The changing process of p from zero to unity is just of v(r, p) from u 0 (r) to u(r) In topology, this is called deformation, L(v) L(u 0 ) and L(v)+N(v) f(r) are called homotopic The basic assumption is that the solution of Eqs (3) and (4) can be expressed as a power series in p : v = v 0 + pv 1 + p 2 v 2 + (7) The approximate solution of Eq (1), therefore, can be readily obtained: u = lim p 1 v = v 0 + v 1 + v 2 + (8) The convergence of the series (8) has been proved in [1,2] Alternative framework To illustrate the modification algorithm of the HPM, consider the following nonlinear partial differential equation with time derivative of any order [18]: D n t u(x, t) =L(u, u x,u xx )+N(u, u x,u xx )+f(x, t), t > 0, (9) where L is a linear operator, N is a nonlinear operator and f is a known analytic function, subject to the initial conditions: m t u(x, 0) = h m(x), m =0, 1, 2,, n 1 (10) m In view of the homotopy technique, we can construct the following homotopy: or [ ] n u n t L(u, u u x,u n xx ) f(x, t) =p t + N(u, u x,u n xx ) Dt n u, (11) [ ] n u n u f(x, t) =p tn t + L(u, u x,u n xx )+N(u, u x,u xx ) Dt n u, (12)

4790 A A Hemeda where p [0, 1] The homotopy parameter p always changes from zero to unity When p = 0, Eq (11) becomes the linearized equation: n u t = L(u, u x,u n xx )+f(x, t), (13) and Eq (12) becomes the linearized equation: n u = f(x, t), (14) tn and when p =1, Eq (11) or Eq (12) turns out to be the original differential Eq (9) The basic assumption is that the solution of Eq (11) or Eq (12) can be written as a power series in p : u = u 0 + pu 1 + p 2 u 2 + (15) Finally, we approximate the solution u(x, t) by: u(x, t) = u i (x, t) (16) i=0 For illustrating the HPM in solving systems of partial differential equations, linear and nonlinear, we consider the following three systems of coupled Burgers equations and Laplace s equation 3 Applications Problem 31 As a first application is the following one-dimensional coupled Burgers equations: u t u xx 2uu x +(uv) x =0, (17a) v t v xx 2vv x +(uv) x =0, (17b) with the initial conditions: u(x, 0) = cos x, v(x, 0) = cos x (17c)

Homotopy perturbation method 4791 In view of Eq (12), the homotopy for Eqs (17a) and (17b) are: [ ] u u t = p t + u xx +2uu x (uv) x D t u, (18a) [ ] v v t = p t + v xx +2vv x (uv) x D t v (18b) As above, the basic assumption is that the solutions of Eqs (17a) and (17b) can be written as a power series in p: u = u 0 + pu 1 + p 2 u 2 +, (19a) v = v 0 + pv 1 + p 2 v 2 + (19b) Therefore, substituting (19) and the initial conditions (17c) into (18) and equating the terms with identical powers of p, we can obtain the following set of linear partial differential equations: u 0 t =0, u 0(x, 0) = cos x, v 0 t =0, v 0(x, 0) = cos x, u 1 t = u 0 t +(u 0) xx +2u 0 (u 0 ) x u 0 (v 0 ) x v 0 (u 0 ) x D t u 0, u 1 (x, 0) = 0, v 1 t = v 0 t +(v 0) xx +2v 0 (v 0 ) x u 0 (v 0 ) x v 0 (u 0 ) x D t v 0, v 1 (x, 0) = 0, u 2 t = u 1 t +(u 1) xx +2u 0 (u 1 ) x +2u 1 (u 0 ) x u 0 (v 1 ) x u 1 (v 0 ) x v 1 (u 0 ) x v 0 (u 1 ) x D t u 1, u 2 (x, 0) = 0,

4792 A A Hemeda v 2 t = v 1 t +(v 1) xx +2v 0 (v 1 ) x +2v 1 (v 0 ) x u 0 (v 1 ) x u 1 (v 0 ) x v 1 (u 0 ) x v 0 (u 1 ) x D t v 1, v 2 (x, 0) = 0, u 3 t = u 2 t +(u 2) xx +2u 0 (u 2 ) x +2u 1 (u 1 ) x +2u 2 (u 0 ) x u 0 (v 2 ) x u 1 (v 1 ) x u 2 (v 0 ) x v 0 (u 2 ) x v 1 (u 1 ) x v 2 (u 0 ) x D t u 2, u 3 (x, 0) = 0, v 3 t = v 2 t +(v 2) xx +2v 0 (v 2 ) x +2v 1 (v 1 ) x +2v 2 (v 0 ) x u 0 (v 2 ) x u 1 (v 1 ) x u 2 (v 0 ) x v 0 (u 2 ) x v 1 (u 1 ) x v 2 (u 0 ) x D t v 2, v 3 (x, 0) = 0, Consequently, the first few components of the homotopy perturbation solution for Eq (17) are derived in the following form: u 0 (x, t) = cos x, v 0 (x, t) = cos x, u 1 (x, t) = cos xt, v 1 (x, t) = cos xt, u 2 (x, t) = cos x t2 2, v 2 (x, t) = cos x t2 2,

Homotopy perturbation method 4793 u 3 (x, t) = cos x t3 6, v 3 (x, t) = cos x t3 6, and so on, in the same manner the rest of components can be obtained The n-term approximate solution for Eq (17) is given by: n 1 ] u(x, t) = u i (x, t) = cos x [1 t + t2 2! t3 3! +, (20a) i=0 n 1 ] v(x, t) = v i (x, t) = cos x [1 t + t2 2! t3 3! + (20b) i=0 In closed form this gives the solution: u(x, t) = cos x exp( t), (21a) v(x, t) = cos x exp( t), (21b) which is the exact solution for the one-dimensional coupled Burgers equations (17) Problem 32 As a second application is the following two-dimensional coupled Burgers equations: u t 2 u 2u u +(uv) x +(uv) y =0, (22a) v t 2 v 2v v +(uv) x +(uv) y =0, (22b) with the initial conditions:

4794 A A Hemeda u(x, y, 0) = cos(x + y), v(x, y, 0) = cos(x + y), (22c) In view of Eq (12), the homotopy for Eqs (22a) and (22b) are: [ ] u u t = p t + 2 u +2u u (uv) x (uv) y D t u, (23a) [ ] v v t = p t + 2 v +2v v (uv) x (uv) y D t v, (23b) As the above problem, substituting (19) and the initial conditions (22c) into (23) and equating the terms with identical powers of p, we can obtain the following set of linear partial differential equations: u 0 t =0, u 0(x, y, 0) = cos(x + y), v 0 t =0, v 0(x, y, 0) = cos(x + y), u 1 t = u 0 t + 2 u 0 +2u 0 u 0 u 0 v 0 v 0 u 0 D t u 0, u 1 (x, y, 0) = 0, v 1 t = v 0 t + 2 v 0 +2v 0 v 0 u 0 v 0 v 0 u 0 D t v 0, v 1 (x, y, 0) = 0, u 2 t = u 1 t + 2 u 1 +2u 0 u 1 +2u 1 u 0 u 0 v 1 u 1 v 0 v 0 u 1 v 1 u 0 D t u 1, u 2 (x, y, 0) = 0, v 2 t = v 1 t + 2 v 1 +2v 0 v 1 +2v 1 v 0 u 0 v 1

Homotopy perturbation method 4795 u 1 v 0 v 0 u 1 v 1 u 0 D t v 1, v 2 (x, y, 0) = 0, u 3 t = u 2 t + 2 u 2 +2u 0 u 2 +2u 1 u 1 +2u 2 u 0 u 0 v 2 u 1 v 1 u 2 v 0 v 0 u 2 v 1 u 1 v 2 u 0 D t u 2, u 3 (x, y, 0) = 0, v 3 t = v 2 t + 2 v 2 +2v 0 v 2 +2v 1 v 1 +2v 2 v 0 u 0 v 2 u 1 v 1 u 2 v 0 v 0 u 2 v 1 u 1 v 2 u 0 D t v 2, v 3 (x, y, 0) = 0 Consequently, the first few components of the homotopy perturbation solution for Eq (22) are derived in the following form: u 0 (x, y, t) = cos(x + y), v 0 (x, y, t) = cos(x + y), u 1 (x, y, t) = 2 cos(x + y)t, v 1 (x, y, t) = 2 cos(x + y)t, u 2 (x, y, t) = 2 cos(x + y)t 2, v 2 (x, y, t) = 2 cos(x + y)t 2, u 3 (x, y, t) = 4 3 cos(x + y)t3, v 3 (x, y, t) = 4 3 cos(x + y)t3,

4796 A A Hemeda and so on, in the same manner the rest of components can be obtained The n-term approximate solution for Eq (22) is given by: n 1 ] u(x, y, t) = u i (x, y, t) = cos(x + y) [1 (2t)+ (2t)2 (2t)3 +, 2! 3! i=0 (24a) n 1 ] v(x, y, t) = v i (x, y, t) = cos(x + y) [1 (2t)+ (2t)2 (2t)3 + (24b) 2! 3! i=0 In closed form this gives the solution: u(x, y, t) = cos(x + y) exp( 2t), (25a) v(x, y, t) = cos(x + y) exp( 2t), (25b) which is the exact solution for the two-dimensional coupled Burgers equations (22) Problem 33 Finally, the third application is the system of Laplace s equation Many physical processes are governed by Laplace s equation: 2 u =0, (26) this equation can be replaced by a system of first-order equations In this case, let u and v represent the unknown variables We require that: u x = v y, (27a) u y = v x, (27b)

Homotopy perturbation method 4797 which is the famous Cauchy-Riemann equations (Churchill, 1960) These equations are extensively used in conformally mapping one region onto another [19] Remark: It should be noted that some differences exist in solving Laplace s equation and Cauchy-Riemann equations A solution of the Cauchy-Riemann equations is a solution of Laplace s equation but the converse is not necessarily true Now, consider the system of Laplace s equation: u x v y =0, (28a) v x + u y =0, (28b) with the initial conditions: u(0,y) = cos y, v(0,y) = sin y (28c) In view of Eq (12), the homotopy for Eqs (28a) and (28b) are: [ u u x = p x + v ] y D xu, (29a) [ v v x = p x u ] y D xv (29b) As the above problems, substituting (19) and the initial conditions (28c) into (29) and equating the terms with identical powers of p, we can obtain the following set of linear partial differential equations: u 0 x =0, u 0(0,y) = cos y, v 0 x =0, v 0(0,y) = sin y, u 1 x = u 0 x + v 0 y D xu 0, u 1 (0,y)=0,

4798 A A Hemeda v 1 x = v 0 x u 0 y D xv 0, v 1 (0,y)=0, u 2 x = u 1 x + v 1 y D xu 1, u 2 (0,y)=0, v 2 x = v 1 x u 1 y D xv 1, v 2 (0,y)=0, u 3 x = u 2 x + v 2 y D xu 2, u 3 (0,y)=0, v 3 x = v 2 x u 2 y D xv 2, v 3 (0,y)=0, Consequently, the first few components of the homotopy perturbation solution for Eq (28) are derived in the following form: u 0 (x, y) = cos y, v 0 (x, y) = sin y, u 1 (x, y) = cos yx, v 1 (x, y) = sin yx, u 2 (x, y) = cos y x2 2, v 2 (x, y) = sin y x2 2, u 3 (x, y) = cos y x3 6, v 3 (x, y) = sin y x3 6,

Homotopy perturbation method 4799 and so on, in the same manner the rest of components can be obtained The n-term approximate solution for Eq (28) is given by: n 1 u(x, y) = i=0 i=0 ] u i (x, y) = cos y [1+x + x2 2! + x3 3! +, (30a) n 1 ] v(x, y) = v i (x, y) = sin y [1+x + x2 2! + x3 3! + (30b) In closed form this gives the solution: u(x, y) = exp(x) cos y, (31a) v(x, y) = exp(x) sin y, (31b) which is the exact solution for the system of Laplace s equation (28) 4 Conclusion The modified homotopy perturbation method suggested in this article is an efficient method for obtaining the exact solution of the coupled Burgers equations and the system of Laplace s equation Therefore, this method is a powerful mathematical tool to solve any system of partial differential equations linear and nonlinear, it is also a promising method to solv other linear and nonlinear partial differential equations References [1] JH He, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 178 (1999) 257 [2] JH He, Int J Non-Linear Mech 35(1) (2000) 37 [3] M El-Shahed, Int J Nonlin Sci Numer Simul 6(2) (2005) 163 [4] JH He, Appl Math Comput 151 (2004) 287 [5] JH He, Int J Nonlin Sci Numer Simul 6(2) (2005) 207 [6] JH He, Phys Lett A 374(4-6) (2005) 228 [7] JH He, Chaos Solitons Fractals 26(3) (2005) 695

4800 A A Hemeda [8] JH He, Phys Lett A 350(1-2) (2006) 87 [9] JH He, Appl Math Comput 135 (2003) 73 [10] JH He, Appl Math Comput 156 (2004) 527 [11] JH He, Appl Math Comput 156 (2004) 591 [12] JH He, Chaos Solitons Fractals 26(3) (2005) 827 [13] JH He, Int J Mod Phys B 20(10) (2006) 1141 [14] A Siddiqui, R Mahmood, Q Ghori, Int J Nonlin Sci Numer Simul 7(1) (2006) 7 [15] A Siddiqui, M, Ahmed, Q Ghori, Int J Nonlin Sci Numer Simul 7(1) (2006) 15 [16] S Abbasbandy, Appl Math Comput 172 (2006) 485 [17] S Abbasbandy, Appl Math Comput 173 (2006) 493 [18] S Momani, Z odibat, Phys Lett A 365 (2007) 345 [19] DA Anderson, JC Tannehill, RH Pletcher, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington New York London, McGraw-Hill Book Company, (1984) Received: March, 2012