HE ATOM & APPROXIMATION METHODS MORE GENERAL VARIATIONAL TREATMENT. Examples:

Similar documents
Chapter 5 Vibrational Motion

Physics 324, Fall Dirac Notation. These notes were produced by David Kaplan for Phys. 324 in Autumn 2001.

1 Adiabatic and diabatic representations

Chapter 8 Approximation Methods, Hueckel Theory

Lecture 25 (Dec. 6, 2017)

Lecture #18

PHY4905: Nearly-Free Electron Model (NFE)

Physics 232 Gauge invariance of the magnetic susceptibilty

Assignment 2 Solutions SOLUTION. ϕ 1 Â = 3 ϕ 1 4i ϕ 2. The other case can be dealt with in a similar way. { ϕ 2 Â} χ = { 4i ϕ 1 3 ϕ 2 } χ.

5.76 Lecture #33 5/08/91 Page 1 of 10 pages. Lecture #33: Vibronic Coupling

5.80 Small-Molecule Spectroscopy and Dynamics

Physics 7440, Solutions to Problem Set # 8

Zeros of Polynomials

Lecture 14 and 15: Algebraic approach to the SHO. 1 Algebraic Solution of the Oscillator 1. 2 Operator manipulation and the spectrum 4

Properties and Tests of Zeros of Polynomial Functions

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 25: Mar 2 nd

The time evolution of the state of a quantum system is described by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE): ( ) ( ) 2m "2 + V ( r,t) (1.

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS 4786)

1. Szabo & Ostlund: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.7. These problems are fairly straightforward and I will not discuss them here.

Lecture #3. Math tools covered today

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation

5.74 TIME-DEPENDENT QUANTUM MECHANICS

LECTURE 14. Non-linear transverse motion. Non-linear transverse motion

1. Hydrogen Atom: 3p State

Lanczos-Haydock Recursion

Lecture 6. Bonds to Bands. But for most problems we use same approximation methods: 6. The Tight-Binding Approximation

Exercises and Problems

Office: JILA A709; Phone ;

PAPER : IIT-JAM 2010

3.2 Properties of Division 3.3 Zeros of Polynomials 3.4 Complex and Rational Zeros of Polynomials

Chimica Inorganica 3

(3) If you replace row i of A by its sum with a multiple of another row, then the determinant is unchanged! Expand across the i th row:

Lesson 10: Limits and Continuity

SECTION 2 Electrostatics

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE

Perturbation Theory I (See CTDL , ) Last time: derivation of all matrix elements for Harmonic-Oscillator: x, p, H. n ij n.

Chapter 4. Fourier Series

Recurrence Relations

x x x Using a second Taylor polynomial with remainder, find the best constant C so that for x 0,

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS 4786)

Recursive Algorithms. Recurrences. Recursive Algorithms Analysis

Ray-triangle intersection

Lecture 3. Properties of Summary Statistics: Sampling Distribution

Chapter 9 - CD companion 1. A Generic Implementation; The Common-Merge Amplifier. 1 τ is. ω ch. τ io

Ma 530 Introduction to Power Series

September 2012 C1 Note. C1 Notes (Edexcel) Copyright - For AS, A2 notes and IGCSE / GCSE worksheets 1

The Method of Least Squares. To understand least squares fitting of data.

MAT 271 Project: Partial Fractions for certain rational functions

Guiding-center transformation 1. δf = q ( c v f 0, (1) mc (v B 0) v f 0. (3)

Forces: Calculating Them, and Using Them Shobhana Narasimhan JNCASR, Bangalore, India

3. Z Transform. Recall that the Fourier transform (FT) of a DT signal xn [ ] is ( ) [ ] = In order for the FT to exist in the finite magnitude sense,

Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion. CSE 2353 Discrete Computational Structures Spring 2018

(3) If you replace row i of A by its sum with a multiple of another row, then the determinant is unchanged! Expand across the i th row:

Quantum Mechanics I. 21 April, x=0. , α = A + B = C. ik 1 A ik 1 B = αc.

We are mainly going to be concerned with power series in x, such as. (x)} converges - that is, lims N n

X. Perturbation Theory

Topic 9: Sampling Distributions of Estimators

Mark Lundstrom Spring SOLUTIONS: ECE 305 Homework: Week 5. Mark Lundstrom Purdue University

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. 3. First-order linear equations as the limiting case of second-order equations

Practice Problems: Taylor and Maclaurin Series

8. Applications To Linear Differential Equations

IP Reference guide for integer programming formulations.

(b) What is the probability that a particle reaches the upper boundary n before the lower boundary m?

1 1 2 = show that: over variables x and y. [2 marks] Write down necessary conditions involving first and second-order partial derivatives for ( x0, y

1.3 Convergence Theorems of Fourier Series. k k k k. N N k 1. With this in mind, we state (without proof) the convergence of Fourier series.

Similarity between quantum mechanics and thermodynamics: Entropy, temperature, and Carnot cycle

Apply change-of-basis formula to rewrite x as a linear combination of eigenvectors v j.

9.3 Power Series: Taylor & Maclaurin Series

The axial dispersion model for tubular reactors at steady state can be described by the following equations: dc dz R n cn = 0 (1) (2) 1 d 2 c.

Appendix: The Laplace Transform

Quadratic Functions. Before we start looking at polynomials, we should know some common terminology.

Microscopic Theory of Transport (Fall 2003) Lecture 6 (9/19/03) Static and Short Time Properties of Time Correlation Functions

TR/46 OCTOBER THE ZEROS OF PARTIAL SUMS OF A MACLAURIN EXPANSION A. TALBOT

Hydrogen (atoms, molecules) in external fields. Static electric and magnetic fields Oscyllating electromagnetic fields

Preliminary Examination - Day 1 Thursday, May 12, 2016

Matsubara-Green s Functions

mx bx kx F t. dt IR I LI V t, Q LQ RQ V t,

Math 113, Calculus II Winter 2007 Final Exam Solutions

Lecture #5. Questions you will by able to answer by the end of today s lecture

4.3 Growth Rates of Solutions to Recurrences

Multiple Groenewold Products: from path integrals to semiclassical correlations

1 Approximating Integrals using Taylor Polynomials

Lecture 6 Chi Square Distribution (χ 2 ) and Least Squares Fitting

Linear regression. Daniel Hsu (COMS 4771) (y i x T i β)2 2πσ. 2 2σ 2. 1 n. (x T i β y i ) 2. 1 ˆβ arg min. β R n d

DETERMINATION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF A NON- UNIFORM BEAM USING THE MEASUREMENT OF THE EXCITED LONGITUDINAL ELASTIC VIBRATIONS.

Vibrational Spectroscopy 1

EXAMINATIONS OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY

Exercise 4.3 Use the Continuity Theorem to prove the Cramér-Wold Theorem, Theorem. (1) φ a X(1).

The Heisenberg versus the Schrödinger picture in quantum field theory. Dan Solomon Rauland-Borg Corporation 3450 W. Oakton Skokie, IL USA

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 22: Feb 22nd 2005

FIR Filter Design: Part II

Numerical Methods in Fourier Series Applications

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 20

Inverse Matrix. A meaning that matrix B is an inverse of matrix A.

Chem Discussion #13 Chapter 10. Correlation diagrams for diatomic molecules. Key

18.01 Calculus Jason Starr Fall 2005

A widely used display of protein shapes is based on the coordinates of the alpha carbons - - C α

Lemma Let f(x) K[x] be a separable polynomial of degree n. Then the Galois group is a subgroup of S n, the permutations of the roots.

Lecture 6 Chi Square Distribution (χ 2 ) and Least Squares Fitting

Math 116 Final Exam December 12, 2014

Transcription:

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page HE ATOM & APPROXIMATION METHODS MORE GENERAL VARIATIONAL TREATMENT Do t restrict the wavefuctio to a sigle term! Could be a liear combiatio of several wavefuctios e.g. two terms: χ = c χ + c χ For simplicity we ll cosider: χ, χ orthoormal, o variatioal parameters c, c real, variatioal parameters Examples: -D oscillator with cubic, quartic potetial terms: x could be HO groud ad excited state wavefuctios χ ( x ), χ ( ) He atom -electro problem χ ( r, r, r r ) χ (, ) could be product H atom groud ad excited state wavefuctios χ (r r r φ ( r, ) = φ ( ) ( r r ) s ( ) ) ( r ) s s χ, = φ r φ s Best values of c ad c give miimum E var χ ot yet ormalized, so ca't write E var = χ H ˆ χ d τ ˆ τχ χ τ τ ( dτχ χd τ d c χ * * d H d d c + c χ ) Hˆ (c χ + c χ ) E var = = * * τ( χ + cχ )(cχ + c χ ) * ˆ c d τχ H χ + cc dτχ H χ + cc dτχ H χ + c d τχ H χ = * * * * c dτχ χ + cc d τχ χ + c c d τχ χ + c dτχ χ * ˆ * ˆ * ˆ Abbreviate itegrals

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page ch + cch + cch + ch var cs + ccs + ccs + cs E = I our case S ij = δ ij but we ll keep these terms for geerality Also ofte H = H but we ll keep both terms for ow ( c S + cc S + cc S + c S ) E var = c H + cc H + cc H + c H Miimize E : Differetiate w.r.t. parameters c c var, ( var cs + ccs + ccs + cs + cs E + c( S + S ) E = ch + ch + c ) E c var var H (c S + ccs + ccs + cs ) + c S + S ) E + c S E = ch + ch + c c E var ( H E var var For best c, c, = E = c c c ( H S E var ) + c H + H ( S + S ) E var = c H + H (S + S ) E var + c (H S E var ) = Drop subscript o E var below ( ) ( ) c H S E H + H S + S E = H + H S + S E (H S E c ( ) ) Solutios give by the secular determiat (H S E ) H + H (S + S ) E H + H (S + S ) E (H S E) = All this follows from χ = c χ + c χ & miimizatio of the eergy No assumptios made about the coefficiets or the itegrals

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 3 wheever we costruct a wavefuctio from two other fuctios, ψ = c φ + c φ we ca immediately solve for the eergies by solvig the secular determiat with the itegrals as defied. We ca also solve for the costats c, c for each eergy, which gives the wavefuctios. Ofte, ad i our case, S = S ad H = H (ote H is Hermitia) Secular determiat becomes ( H S E ) ( H S E ) ( H S E ) ( H S E ) = Also ofte, S = S = i which case (H S E ) H H ( H S E ) = ad also ofte, S = S = i which case (H E H ( H E) H = H ( H E) )( E) H = E ( H + H ) E + H H H = H + H ± ( H + H ) 4( H H H ) H + H H H E = = ± + H More geerally if we write wavefuctio as liear combiatio of N fuctios, ψ = c φ + c φ +... + c N φ N aalogous treatmet yields N eergies solved through secular determiat

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 4 H S E H S E L H S E N N H S E H S E L H S E N N M M M H N S N E H N S N E L H NN S NN E = We ll see this i costructig MO s out of AO s, for example. HE ATOM PERTURBATION THEORY ˆ H = ( + ) Z + + H ˆ ( ) + H ˆ ( ) He r r r Z Z, ) = separable i r ad r Ĥ ( ) (r r r r ˆ H ( ) ψ ( ) ( ) = E ( ) ψ exactly soluble part He atom groud state -electro wavefuctios ψ ( ) (, ) s ( ) ( ) r r = φ r φ s r = Z 3 Z 3 e Zr Zr e i atomic uits π π E ( ) Z = Z = = E s + E s = Z Z = 4 a.u. = 8.84 ev E expt =.93 a.u. = 79. ev Neglect of electro-electro repulsios is iadequate PERTURBATION THEORY ( ST order) H ˆ = H ˆ ( ) + Hˆ () H ˆ ( ) ψ ( ) = E ( ) ψ ( ) Expad ψ ad E: ( ) ψ =ψ +ψ () ( ) () E = E + E ( Hˆ ( ) + H ˆ () )(ψ ( ) +ψ ( ) ( ) = (E ) + E ( ) ( ) )(ψ +ψ ( ) )

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 5 ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) () () () ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) () () () Ĥ ψ + Ĥ ψ + Ĥ ψ + Ĥ ψ = E ψ + E ψ + E ψ + E ψ First terms o each side are equal. Last terms o each side are egligible. ˆ ( ) ( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) H ψ + H ψ = E ψ + E ψ () Solve for ψ ( * ) ad E (). Left-multiply by ψ ad itegrate: ( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ˆ dτψ * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) H ψ + dτψ * H ψ = dτψ * E ψ + dτψ * E ψ ( * ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) () ˆ ( ) Note dτψ H ψ = dτ (H ψ ) * ψ sice H is a Hermitia operator ( ) ( ) ( * ) ( * ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( * ) ( ) ( ) dτψ E ψ + dτψ H ψ = E dτψ ψ + E () ( )* () ( ) E = dτψ Ĥ ψ First-order correctio to eergy E ( ). HELIUM ATOM: PERTURBATION THEORY TREATMENT 3 ( ) Z 3 ψ, Z Zr (r r ) = φ s ( r ) φ s ( r ) = e π π Ĥ () = r e Zr () ( ) Z 6 τ Z 6 e Zr * e Zr ˆ Zr Zr Zr 5 Zr dτ = Z (McQ-S. prob. 7-3) π r π r 8 () ( ) E = dτψ H ψ = d e e e e = 5 E = E ( ) + E ( ) = Z + Z = a.u. = 74.83 ev 8 4 SUMMARY:

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 6 Neglect of e ( ) - e repulsio E = 4 a.u. = 8.84 ev st order perturbatio theory E ( ) + E ( ) = 4 a.u. = 74.83 ev 3 3 th order perturbatio theory E ( ) + E ( ) +... + E ( ) =.94 a.u. = 79. ev Experimet E =.93 a.u. = 79. ev Perturbatio theory results may be greater or less tha the true eergy, ulike variatioal results. Perturbatio theory ca be used to calculate ay eergy level, ot just the groud state. PERTURBATION THEORY (cot d) Now retur to ˆ ( ) ( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) H ψ + H ψ = E ψ + E ψ () Solve for ψ by writig ψ as liear comb. of uperturbed wavefuctios: ψ =ψ ( ) ( ) ( ) () +ψ =ψ + a j ψ j j ( * ) Left-multiply by ψ k ad itegrate: dτψ k H ψ + dτψ k ( * ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( * ) ( ) ( Ĥ ψ ) * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) = dτψ ( ) k E ψ + dτψ * k E ψ

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 7 ( ) k j * dτψ Hˆ ( ) a ψ () + dτψ ( * ) Hˆ ( ) ψ ( ) = dτψ ( * ) E ( ) a ψ + dτψ * E ψ j j k k j () ( ) ( ) ( ) j j k () ( * ) () ( * ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( * ) () ( ) * aj E j dτψ k ψ j + dτψ k H ψ = E aj d τψ k ψ j + E dτψ k ψ j j ( ) ( ) () () ( ) ( )* ( ) ( )* ( ) ( ) a (E E ) = E dτψ ψ dτψ Ĥ ψ k k k k () k E ( = = dτψ * ) ˆ ( ) ( ) H ψ ( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) () dτψ * k H ψ Ĥ k k a k = () () () E E k E E k () () ( * ) Hˆ ( ) ( ψ ) Ĥ j ψ () =ψ ( ) + dτψ j j j j j ψ =ψ ( ) +ψ ( ) =ψ ( ) + E () E () j E () E () j First-order correctio to the wavefuctio ψ () (See also McQ. prob. 7-4) Secod-order correctio to the eergy: (See also McQ. prob. 7-4) Expad ψ ad E: ( ) () () ψ =ψ +ψ + ψ ( E = E ) () + E + E () (Ĥ ( ) + Ĥ ( ) )(ψ ( ) +ψ () + ψ () ) = (E ( ) + E () + E () )(ψ ( ) +ψ () + ψ () ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ĥ ψ = E ψ zero order () ( ) ( ) () () ( ) ( ) () Ĥ ψ + Ĥ ψ = E ψ + E ψ first order Collect secod-order terms ( ) () () () () Ĥ ψ () + Ĥ ψ = E ( ) ψ () + E ψ + E () ψ ( ) ( * ) Left-multiply by ψ ad itegrate:

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 8 ( ) ˆ ( ) () ( ) ˆ dτψ * ( ) ( ) H ψ + dτψ * H ψ ( * ) ( ) () ( * ) () () ( * ) () ( ) = dτψ E ψ + dτψ E ψ + dτψ E ψ ( )* () () () ( )* () () ( )* () ( )* () dτψ E ψ = E dτψ ψ = E dτψ a ψ = a dτψ ψ = dτψ j j j j ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) () * Ĥ ψ = dτ (Ĥ ψ ) * ψ = dτψ * E ψ j j E = dτψ * Ĥ ψ Ĥ () Ĥ () Ĥ () = dτψ * Ĥ j ψ j j () () j = () j E E j j E E j () ( ) () () ( ) () () () PERTURBATION THEORY EXAMPLE: HO + liear potetial term Ĥ () = h d + kx µ dx Ĥ () = λh ωα x ψ () = α 4 e α x ψ () α 4 = α α x α = kµ ( x) e π π h () k E = + hω ω = µ FIRST ORDER: Fid E () for lowest HO levels α () ()* ˆ () () α x E = ψ H ψ dx = λh ωα xe dx = π () ()* ˆ () () α 4α 3 α x E = ψ H ψ dx = λh ωα ( ) x e dx = π It s as log as ψ ()* ψ () = ψ () is of eve symmetry! Simple model for polar molecule i a electric field HO with particle of charge q i field E (alog x directio) Ĥ () = U E ( x )= qe x () No effect to first order sice ψ are symmetric about x = Same for homouclear diatomic molecule: charge desity symmetric about x = Same for ANY molecule with iversio symmetry, e.g. SF 6 etc.!

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page 9 But ot for heterouclear diatomics or ay molecule without iversio symmetry! () The eergy levels chage to first order i the field: E E How much chage depeds o molecular dipole momet µ Ĥ () = U ( )= ( q x = q x E x i E i ) E i i i i µe µ= if charges are distributed symmetrically about x = More geerally Ĥ () = µ E vector quatities d ORDER: α 4 Recall geeral HO solutios: ψ () = NH (α α x xe ) N = (!) π ad recursio relatio for the Hermite polyomials H : ξ H ξ = H + ( ξ ) + H ( ξ ) ( ) Easy to verify for the first few: H ξ = H ξ = ξ H ξ = 4ξ H ξ = 8ξ ξ ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 ( ) 3 Fid E () for lowest HO levels Hˆ () Hˆ () () j j E = () E j j E () ˆ () ()* ˆ () () ()* () ()* N h () H j = ψ j H ψ dx = λ ω ψ j (α x)ψ dx = λh ω ψ j ψ dx N λh ω ()* () = ψ ψ dx j Oly j = term i the sum is ozero! Ĥ () = λhω = Ĥ () ˆ () ˆ () H H λ ( hω ) E () = = = λ h ω () () E E hω

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page Similar for ext level E () = Hˆ () Hˆ () j j () () j E E j ˆ () ()* ˆ () () ()* () ()* N h () N () H j = ψ j H ψ dx = λ ω ψ j (α x)ψ dx = λh ω ψ j ψ + ψ dx N N 8 ()* () ()* () j = λh ω ψ ψ dx + h ψ ψ dx j λ ω Oly j = ad j = terms i the sum are ozero Ĥ () = λhω = Ĥ () Ĥ () = λhω = Ĥ () ( ) ˆ () ˆ () ˆ () ˆ () λ hω λ hω E () = + = + = λ h ω () () () () E E E E hω hω H H H H ( ) same correctio! Actually HO + liear potetial problem ca be solved exactly! U = kx + h α λ ω x = kx + λh ωα x + λ ω h where d = λh ωα k h λ ω k ( x d ) λ ω h This is just HO with potetial eergy miimum shifted to x = d ad U = λ h ω (costat). Wavefuctios are the same except cetered aroud x = d istead of x = Eergies are the same except the miimum of eergy (the potetial eergy miimum) has bee set to λ hω istead of. Spacigs betwee eergy levels are still hω. HELIUM ATOM HARTREE-FOCK METHOD He electroic wavefuctio

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page Writte as product of two H-like s orbital wavefuctios: ~ ~ r r φ Z Z χ (, ) = s ( r ) φ s ( r ) where ~ 3 ~ Z Z ~ s r = π a φ ( ) e Zr a -electro H atom orbitals How do we kow the s orbitals are the best choices? WE DON T! MORE GENERAL APPROACH: Do t specify or restrict the form of the -electro wavefuctios! χ (r, r ) = φ ( r ) φ ( r ) Problem: Fid the best -electro orbitals, labeled the Hartree-Fock orbitals φ HF ( r ) φ HF, ( r ) ad solve for the eergy E var = E HF Iterpret φ * ( r ) φ ( r ) = φ ( ) as charge desity for electro #. r The effective potetial eergy for e- # at poit r due to e- # is φ ( )dr U eff ( r ) = φ * ( r ) r r Coulomb potetial felt by e- # averaged over all positios of e- #, weighted by φ ( r ) Now write effective Hamiltoia ad Schrodiger eq. for just electro #! Recall full Hamiltoia

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page ˆ H He (r r ( + r r r, ) = + ) Z + ad write ˆ eff Z H ( r ) = + r eff Ĥ ( r ) φ ( r ) = εφ ( r ) U eff ( ) r Hartree-Fock equatio for the He atom i just oe electro s coordiates! But to solve it, we eed φ ( r )! HOW TO DO IT: THE SELF-CONSISTENT FIELD (SCF) METHOD. Start with trial wavefuctio ( ) φ r eff ( ) ( r ). Use φ r to calculate U U φ r d eff ( r ) = φ * ( r ) ( ) r r 3. Isert U eff ( ) Ĥ eff r ito ( r ) ad solve HF equatio for φ ( r ) ˆ eff Z eff r r H ( r ) = + U ( ) ˆ r φ r = εφ ( r ) H eff ( ) ( ) eff ( ) ( r ). Use φ r calculate U φ r r U eff ( r ) = φ * ( ) d r ( ) r 3. Isert U eff eff ( r ) ( r ) ( ) ito Ĥ ˆ eff Z H ( r ) = + r Ĥ eff ( r ) φ ( r ) = ε φ ( r ) U eff ( ) r ad solve HF equatio for φ r

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page3 eff ( ) ( r ). Use φ r calculate U 3. Isert U eff ( ) ito Ĥ eff r ( ) r ( ) ad solve HF equatio for φ r etc. Cotiue util SELF-CONSISTENT results φ HF ( r,φ HF ) ( r ) are reached The χ (r r, ) = φ HF ( r ) φ HF ( r ) Calculate the Hartree-Fock eergy usig the full Hamiltoia: E HF HF = * ( ) φ HF* ( r ) ) + + HF Z φ r φ HF ( r ) d d r r r I + I + J φ r ( + ( ) r r where I = φ HF * ( ) r r φ HF* ( ) Z φ HF ( r ) dr I Z φ HF = r ( r )dr = I r HF J = * HF r * r φ HF r φ HF φ ( ) φ ( ) ( ) ( r ) drd r r Coulomb Itegral Result for the Helium atom: E HF = -77.87 ev E expt = -79. ev COMPARISON OF ENERGIES:

5.6 4 Lecture #3-4 page4 * ( ) ˆ eff ( ) ( ) ε = φ r H r φ r dr = I + J = E I ε = I + J ε + ε = I + I + J = E + J E What do these terms represet physically? I looks like the eergy of the Helium io, calculated usig the HF orbitals. (which were determied usig the Coulomb iteractio betwee electros) The ε = total eergy of He atom - eergy of He io = ioizatio eergy! E io ε HF value: Exp t:.98 au = 5. ev.94 au = 4.6 ev Mai approximatio: use of same orbitals for the atom ad the io. For io, should use H-atom orbital with Z= o iterelectro repulsio.