Density models for credit risk

Similar documents
Information and Credit Risk

EMS SCHOOL Risk Theory and Related Topics

PROGRESSIVE ENLARGEMENTS OF FILTRATIONS AND SEMIMARTINGALE DECOMPOSITIONS

STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS, CONTROLLED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS AN APPLICATIONS

INVARIANCE TIMES. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d Évry and UMR CNRS Évry Cedex, France

DEFAULT TIMES, NON ARBITRAGE CONDITIONS AND CHANGE OF PROBABILITY MEASURES

CIMPA SCHOOL, 2007 Jump Processes and Applications to Finance Monique Jeanblanc

Pseudo-stopping times and the hypothesis (H)

Non-arbitrage condition and thin random times

Immersion of strong Brownian filtrations with honest time avoiding stopping times

Lecture 22 Girsanov s Theorem

Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales

The instantaneous and forward default intensity of structural models

Applications of Ito s Formula

An essay on the general theory of stochastic processes

B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAULT

Stochastic Areas and Applications in Risk Theory

The Cameron-Martin-Girsanov (CMG) Theorem

1. Stochastic Processes and filtrations

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

Existence and Comparisons for BSDEs in general spaces

Stochastic Integration and Continuous Time Models

Semimartingales and Shrinkage of Filtration

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

The multidimensional Ito Integral and the multidimensional Ito Formula. Eric Mu ller June 1, 2015 Seminar on Stochastic Geometry and its applications

On continuous time contract theory

Unexpected Default in Information based Model

Branching Processes II: Convergence of critical branching to Feller s CSB

Path Decomposition of Markov Processes. Götz Kersting. University of Frankfurt/Main

Tools of stochastic calculus

The Skorokhod problem in a time-dependent interval

Nonlinear representation, backward SDEs, and application to the Principal-Agent problem

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Supermartingales as Radon-Nikodym Densities and Related Measure Extensions

What happens after a default: the conditional. approach

Optimal investment strategies for an index-linked insurance payment process with stochastic intensity

A Barrier Version of the Russian Option

Stochastic Calculus (Lecture #3)

Generalized Gaussian Bridges of Prediction-Invertible Processes

Dynamic Risk Measures and Nonlinear Expectations with Markov Chain noise

Minimal Supersolutions of Backward Stochastic Differential Equations and Robust Hedging

The Pedestrian s Guide to Local Time

Counterparty Risk Modeling: A Marked Default Time Perspective

Fundamental Inequalities, Convergence and the Optional Stopping Theorem for Continuous-Time Martingales

Uniformly Uniformly-ergodic Markov chains and BSDEs

Question 1. The correct answers are: (a) (2) (b) (1) (c) (2) (d) (3) (e) (2) (f) (1) (g) (2) (h) (1)

Information Reduction in Credit Risk Models

Backward Stochastic Differential Equations with Infinite Time Horizon

Backward martingale representation and endogenous completeness in finance

On the dual problem of utility maximization

Mean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem

Numerical scheme for quadratic BSDEs and Dynamic Risk Measures

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 11 Jan 2013

Weak solutions of mean-field stochastic differential equations

Non-Zero-Sum Stochastic Differential Games of Controls and St

BSDEs of Counterparty Risk

SUPERMARTINGALES AS RADON-NIKODYM DENSITIES AND RELATED MEASURE EXTENSIONS

Representing Gaussian Processes with Martingales

Optimal Stopping Problems and American Options

ELEMENTS OF STOCHASTIC CALCULUS VIA REGULARISATION. A la mémoire de Paul-André Meyer

Squared Bessel Process with Delay

On the submartingale / supermartingale property of diffusions in natural scale

Exercises in stochastic analysis

Short-time expansions for close-to-the-money options under a Lévy jump model with stochastic volatility

Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes

{σ x >t}p x. (σ x >t)=e at.

On the monotonicity principle of optimal Skorokhod embedding problem

Exponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes

Convergence at first and second order of some approximations of stochastic integrals

Filtrations, Markov Processes and Martingales. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition

Mean-Variance Hedging for Continuous Processes: New Proofs and Examples

Nested Uncertain Differential Equations and Its Application to Multi-factor Term Structure Model

Survival Analysis: Counting Process and Martingale. Lu Tian and Richard Olshen Stanford University

Summable processes which are not semimartingales

A Direct Proof of the Bichteler-Dellacherie Theorem and Connections to Arbitrage

STAT 331. Martingale Central Limit Theorem and Related Results

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 24 Sep 2018

Thomas Knispel Leibniz Universität Hannover

4. Conditional risk measures and their robust representation

Stochastic Calculus for Finance II - some Solutions to Chapter VII

Utility Maximization in Hidden Regime-Switching Markets with Default Risk

Optimal Stopping under Adverse Nonlinear Expectation and Related Games

1 Infinitely Divisible Random Variables

STAT331. Combining Martingales, Stochastic Integrals, and Applications to Logrank Test & Cox s Model

MFE6516 Stochastic Calculus for Finance

On Minimal Entropy Martingale Measures

Affine Processes. Econometric specifications. Eduardo Rossi. University of Pavia. March 17, 2009

A new approach for investment performance measurement. 3rd WCMF, Santa Barbara November 2009

Toward a benchmark GPU platform to simulate XVA

Dynamic Pricing for Non-Perishable Products with Demand Learning

LECTURE 2: LOCAL TIME FOR BROWNIAN MOTION

arxiv: v2 [math.pr] 14 Nov 2018

Martingale Problems. Abhay G. Bhatt Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi

Stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations and modulation of solitary waves

Applications of Optimal Stopping and Stochastic Control

Wiener chaos and the Cox Ingersoll Ross model

OPTIONAL DECOMPOSITION FOR CONTINUOUS SEMIMARTINGALES UNDER ARBITRARY FILTRATIONS. Introduction

A class of globally solvable systems of BSDE and applications

Monitoring actuarial assumptions in life insurance

Jump Processes. Richard F. Bass

Transcription:

Density models for credit risk Nicole El Karoui, Ecole Polytechnique, France Monique Jeanblanc, Université d Évry; Institut Europlace de Finance Ying Jiao, Université Paris VII Workshop on stochastic calculus and finance, July 29, Hong-Kong Financial support from La Fondation du Risque and Fédération Bancaire Française 1

Density Hypothesis Density Hypothesis Let (Ω, A, F, P) be a filtered probability space. A strictly positive and finite random variable τ (the default time) is given. Our goals are to show how the information contained in the reference filtration F canbeusedtoobtaininformationonthelawofτ, to investigate the links between martingales in the different filtrations that will appear. 2

Density Hypothesis We assume the following density hypothesis: there exists a non-atomic non-negative measure η such that, for any time t, there exists an F t B(R + )-measurable function (ω, θ) α t (ω, θ) which satisfies P(τ dθ F t )=α t (θ)η(dθ), P a.s. The conditional distribution of τ is characterized by the survival probability defined by G t (θ) :=P(τ >θ F t )= θ α t (u)η(du) Let G t := G t (t) =P(τ >t F t )= t α t (u)η(du) Observe that the set A t := {G t > } contains a.s. the event {τ >t}. 3

Density Hypothesis The family α t (.) is called the conditional density of τ w.r.t. η given F t. Note that G t (θ) =E(G θ F t ) for any θ t the law of τ is P(τ >θ)= θ for any t, α t (u)η(du) =1 α (u)η(du) For an integrable F T σ(τ) r.v. Y T (τ), one has, for t T : E(Y T (τ) F t )=E( Y T (u)α T (u)η(du) F t ) The default time τ avoids F-stopping times, i.e., P(τ = ϑ) =for every F-stopping time ϑ. G t (θ) :=P(τ >θ F t )= θ α t (u)η(du) 4

Density Hypothesis The family α t (.) is called the conditional density of τ w.r.t. η given F t. Note that G t (θ) =E(G θ F t ) for any θ t taking, w.l.g., α (u) = 1, the law of τ is P(τ >θ)= θ for any t, α t (u)η(du) =1 For an integrable F T σ(τ) r.v. Y T (τ), one has, for t T : η(du) E(Y T (τ) F t )=E( Y T (u)α T (u)η(du) F t ) The default time τ avoids F-stopping times, i.e., P(τ = ϑ) =for every F-stopping time ϑ. G t (θ) :=P(τ >θ F t )= θ α t (u)η(du) 5

Density Hypothesis By using the density, we adopt an additive point of view to represent the conditional probability of τ G t (θ) = θ α t (u)η(du) In the default framework, the intensity point of view is often preferred, and one uses a multiplicative representation as G t (θ) =exp( θ λ t (u)η(du)) where λ t (u) = u ln G t (u) is the forward intensity. 6

Computation of conditional expectations Computation of conditional expectations Let D =(D t ) t be the smallest right-continuous filtration such that τ is a D-stopping time, and let G = F D. Any G t -measurable r.v. H G t may be represented as H G t = H F t 1 {τ>t} + H t (τ)1 {τ t} where Ht F is an F t -measurable random variable and H t (τ) isf t σ(τ) measurable H F t = E[HG t 1 {τ>t} F t ] G t a.s. on A t ; = if not. 7

Computation of conditional expectations Computation of conditional expectations Let D =(D t ) t be the smallest right-continuous filtration such that τ is a D-stopping time, and let G = F D. Any G t -measurable r.v. H G t may be represented as H G t = H F t 1 {τ>t} + H t (τ)1 {τ t} where Ht F is an F t -measurable random variable and H t (τ) isf t σ(τ) measurable H F t = E[HG t 1 {τ>t} F t ] G t a.s. on A t ; = if not. 8

Computation of conditional expectations Immersion property In the particular case where α t (θ) =α θ (θ), θ t one has G t =1 α t (θ)η(dθ) =1 α T (θ)η(dθ) =P(τ >t F T ) a.s. for any T t and P(τ >t F t )=P(τ >t F ). This last equality is equivalent to the immersion property (i.e. F martingales are G-martingales). Conversely, if immersion property holds, then P(τ >t F t )=P(τ >t F ) hence, the process G is decreasing and the conditional survival functions G t (θ) are constant in time on [θ, ), i.e., G t (θ) =G θ (θ) fort>θ. G t := P(τ >t F t )= t α t (u)η(du) 9

Dynamic point of view and density process Dynamic point of view and density process Regular Version of Martingales One of the major difficulties is to prove the existence of a universal càdlàg martingale version of this family of densities. 1

Dynamic point of view and density process F-decompositions of the survival process G The Doob-Meyer decomposition of the super-martingale G is given by G t =1+Mt F α u (u)η(du) where M F is the càdlàg square-integrable martingale defined as M F t = ( αt (u) α u (u) ) η(du) =E[ α u (u)η(du) F t ] 1. Let ζ F := inf{t : G t =}. We define λ F t := α t(t) G t for any t ζ F and let λ F t = λ F t ζ for any t>ζ F.Themultiplicative decomposition of F G is given by G t = L F t e λf s η(ds) where dl F t = e λf s η(ds) dm F t. 11

Dynamic point of view and density process F-decompositions of the survival process G The Doob-Meyer decomposition of the super-martingale G is given by G t =1+Mt F α u (u)η(du) where M F is the càdlàg square-integrable martingale defined as M F t = ( αt (u) α u (u) ) η(du) =E[ α u (u)η(du) F t ] 1. Let ζ F := inf{t : G t =}. We define λ F t := α t(t) G t for any t ζ F and let λ F t = λ F t ζ for any t>ζ F.Themultiplicative decomposition of F G is given by G t = L F t e λf s η(ds) where dl F t = e λf s η(ds) dm F t. 12

Dynamic point of view and density process Proof: 1) First notice that ( α u(u)η(du),t ) is an F-adapted continuous increasing process. By the martingale property of (α t (θ),t ), for any fixed t, G t = t α t (u)η(du) =E[ t α u (u)η(du) F t ], a.s.. From the properties of the density, 1 G t = α t(u)η(du) and M F t := (α t (u) α u (u))η(du) =E[ α u (u)η(du) F t ] 1. 2) By definition of L F t and 1), we have dl F t = e λf s η(ds) dg t + e λf s η(ds) λ F t G t η(dt) =e λf s η(ds) dm F t, which implies the result. 13

Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G-intensity Definition: Let τ be a G-stopping time. The G-compensator Λ G of τ is the G-predictable increasing process such that (1 {τ t} Λ G t,t ) is a G-martingale. The G-compensator is stopped at τ, i.e., Λ G t =Λ G t τ. Λ G coincides, on the set {τ t}, with an F-predictable process Λ F, i.e. Λ G t 1 {τ t} =Λ F t 1 {τ t}. the G-compensator Λ G of τ admits a density given by λ G t =1 {τ>t} λ F t =1 {τ>t} α t (t) G t. In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G-stopping time. For any t<ζ F and T t, wehaveα t (T )=E[λ G T F t]. 14

Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G-intensity Definition: Let τ be a G-stopping time. The G-compensator Λ G of τ is the G-predictable increasing process such that (1 {τ t} Λ G t,t ) is a G-martingale. The G-compensator is stopped at τ, i.e., Λ G t =Λ G t τ. Λ G coincides, on the set {τ t}, with an F-predictable process Λ F, i.e. Λ G t 1 {τ t} =Λ F t 1 {τ t}. the G-compensator Λ G of τ is absolutely continuous w.r.t. η with λ G t =1 {τ>t} λ F t =1 {τ>t} α t (t) G t. In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G-stopping time. For any t<ζ F and T t, wehaveα t (T )=E[λ G T F t]. 15

Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G-intensity Definition: Let τ be a G-stopping time. The G-compensator Λ G of τ is the G-predictable increasing process such that (1 {τ t} Λ G t,t ) is a G-martingale. The G-compensator is stopped at τ, i.e., Λ G t =Λ G t τ. Λ G coincides, on the set {τ t}, with an F-predictable process Λ F, i.e. Λ G t 1 {τ t} =Λ F t 1 {τ t}. the G-compensator Λ G of τ is absolutely continuous w.r.t. η with λ G t =1 {τ>t} λ F t =1 {τ>t} α t (t) G t. In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G-stopping time. For any t<ζ F and T t, wehaveα t (T )=E[λ G T F t]. 16

Dynamic point of view and density process Proof: 1) The G-martingale property of (1 {τ t} λg s η(ds),t ) is equivalent to the G-martingale property of This follows from (1 {τ>t} e λg s η(ds) =1 {τ>t} e λf s η(ds),t ) E[1 {τ>t} e λf s η(ds) E[1 {τ>t} e λf s η(ds) F s ] G s ] = 1 {τ>s} G s = 1 {τ>s} E[G t e λf s η(ds) F s ] G s =1 {τ>s} L F s G s, where the last equality follows from the F-local martingale property of L F. Moreover, the continuity of the compensator Λ G implies that τ is totally inaccessible. 17

Dynamic point of view and density process 2) By the martingale property of density, for any T t, α t (T )=E[α T (T ) F t ]. Applying 1), we obtain [ α t (T )=E α T (T ) 1 ] {τ>t} F t = E[λ G T F t ], t <ζ F, G T hence, the value of the density can be partially deduced from the intensity. 18

Dynamic point of view and density process G-martingale characterization Acàdlàg process Y G is a G-martingale if and only if there exist an F-adapted càdlàg process Y and an F t B(R + )-optional process Y t (.) such that Y G t = Y t 1 {τ>t} + Y t (τ)1 {τ t} and that (Y t G t + Y s(s)α s (s)η(ds), t ) is an F-local martingale; (Y t (θ)α t (θ),t θ) isanf-martingale on [θ, ζ θ ). 19

Dynamic point of view and density process Any F-martingale Y F is a G-semimartingale. Moreover, it admits the decomposition Yt F where M Y,G is a G-martingale and A Y,G := A t 1 {τ>t} + A t (τ)1 {τ t} is an optional process with finite variation given by = M Y,G t + A Y,G t A t = d[y F,G] s G s and A t (θ) = θ d[y F,α(θ)] s α s (θ). 2

Dynamic point of view and density process Girsanov theorem Let Zt G = z t 1 {τ>t} + z t (τ)1 {τ t} be a positive G-martingale with Z G =1andletZt F = z t G t + z t(u)α t (u)η(du) be its F projection. Let Q be the probability measure defined on G t by dq = Zt G dp. Then, α Q t (θ) =α t (θ) z t(θ), t [θ, ζ θ ); Zt F and: (i) the Q-conditional survival process is defined on [,ζ F )by G Q t = G t z t Z F t (ii) the (F, Q)-intensity process is λ F,Q t (iii) L F,Q is the (F, Q)-local martingale = λ F t z t (t) z t,η(dt)- a.s.; L F,Q t = L F t z t Z F t exp (λ F,Q s λ F s)η(ds),t [,ζ F ) 21

Dynamic point of view and density process Girsanov theorem Let Zt G = z t 1 {τ>t} + z t (τ)1 {τ t} be a positive G-martingale with Z G =1andletZt F = z t G t + z t(u)α t (u)η(du) be its F projection. Let Q be the probability measure defined on G t by dq = Zt G dp. Then, α Q t (θ) =α t (θ) z t(θ), t [θ, ζ θ ); Zt F and: (i) the Q-conditional survival process is defined on [,ζ F )by G Q t = G t z t Z F t (ii) the (F, Q)-intensity process is λ F,Q t (iii) L F,Q is the (F, Q)-local martingale = λ F t z t (t) z t,η(dt)- a.s.; L F,Q t = L F t z t Z F t exp (λ F,Q s λ F s)η(ds),t [,ζ F ) 22

Dynamic point of view and density process Girsanov theorem Let Zt G = z t 1 {τ>t} + z t (τ)1 {τ t} be a positive G-martingale with Z G =1andletZt F = z t G t + z t(u)α t (u)η(du) be its F projection. Let Q be the probability measure defined on G t by dq = Zt G dp. Then, α Q t (θ) =α t (θ) z t(θ), t [θ, ζ θ ); Zt F and: (i) the Q-conditional survival process is defined on [,ζ F )by G Q t = G t z t Z F t (ii) the (F, Q)-intensity process is λ F,Q t (iii) L F,Q is the (F, Q)-local martingale = λ F t z t (t) z t,η(dt)- a.s.; L F,Q t = L F t z t Z F t exp (λ F,Q s λ F s)η(ds),t [,ζ F ) 23

Dynamic point of view and density process Girsanov theorem Let Zt G = z t 1 {τ>t} + z t (τ)1 {τ t} be a positive G-martingale with Z G =1andletZt F = z t G t + z t(u)α t (u)η(du) be its F projection. Let Q be the probability measure defined on G t by dq = Zt G dp. Then, α Q t (θ) =α t (θ) z t(θ), t [θ, ζ θ ); Zt F and: (i) the Q-conditional survival process is defined on [,ζ F )by G Q t = G t z t Z F t (ii) the (F, Q)-intensity process is λ F,Q t (iii) L F,Q is the (F, Q)-local martingale = λ F t z t (t) z t,η(dt)- a.s.; L F,Q t = L F t z t Z F t exp (λ F,Q s λ F s)η(ds),t [,ζ F ) 24

Dynamic point of view and density process Proof: For any t [,ζ F ), the Q-conditional probability can be calculated by G Q t = Q(τ >t F t )= E[1 {τ>t} Z G t F t ] Z F t = z t G t Z F t and, for any θ t, Q(τ θ F t )= EP [1 {τ θ} Z G t F t ] Z F t = EP [1 {τ θ} z t (τ) F t ] Z F t = θ z t(u)α t (u)η(du). Z F t The density process is then obtained by taking derivatives. Finally, we use λ F,Q t = α Q t (t)/g Q t and L F,Q t = G Q t e λf,q s η(ds). 25

Dynamic point of view and density process Given a density process, it is possible to construct a random variable τ such that P(τ >θ F t )=G t (θ) aswepresentnow: Let (Ω, A, F, P) andτ a random variable with law P(τ >t)=g (t) = η(du), independent of F t, constructed on an extended probability space, and α the given density process. Define dq Gt = Q G t dp Gt with Q G 1 t = 1 t<τ α t (u)η((du)+ 1 τ t α t (τ). G t t Then, Q is a probability which coincides with P on F t and under Q, α Q = α. (Note that this result was obtained by Grorud and Pontier in a finite horizon case) 26

Dynamic point of view and density process Given a density process, it is possible to construct a random variable τ such that P(τ >θ F t )=G t (θ) aswepresentnow: Let (Ω, A, F, P) andτ a random variable with law P(τ >θ)=g (θ) = η(du), independent of F θ, constructed on an extended probability space, and α the given density process. Define dq Gt = Q G t dp Gt with Q G 1 t = 1 t<τ α t (u)η((du)+ 1 τ t α t (τ). G t t Then, Q is a probability which coincides with P on F t and under Q, α Q = α. (Note that this result was obtained by Grorud and Pontier in a finite horizon case) 27

Dynamic point of view and density process Given a density process, it is possible to construct a random variable τ such that P(τ >θ F t )=G t (θ) aswepresentnow: Let (Ω, A, F, P) andτ a random variable with law P(τ >t)=g (t) = η(du), independent of F t, constructed on an extended probability space, and α the given density process. Define dq Gt = Z G t dp Gt with Zt G 1 = 1 t<τ α t (u)η(du)+ 1 τ t α t (τ). G t t Then, Q is a probability which coincides with P on F t and under Q, α Q = α. (Note that this result was obtained by Grorud and Pontier in a finite horizon case) 28

Dynamic point of view and density process Given a density process, it is possible to construct a random variable τ such that P(τ >θ F t )=G t (θ) aswepresentnow: Let (Ω, A, F, P) andτ a random variable with law P(τ >t)=g (t) = η(du), independent of F t, constructed on an extended probability space, and α the given density process. Define dq Gt = Z G t dp Gt with Zt G 1 = 1 t<τ α t (u)η(du)+ 1 τ t α t (τ). G t t Then, Q is a probability which coincides with P on F t and under Q, α Q = α. (Note that this result was obtained by Grorud and Pontier in a finite horizon case) 29

Dynamic point of view and density process The change of probability measure generated by the two processes z t =(L F t ) 1, z t (θ) = α θ(θ) α t (θ) provides a model where the immersion property holds true, and where the intensity processes does not change. More generally, the only changes of probability measure for which the immersion property holds with the same intensity process are generated by a process z such that (z t L F t,t ) is an uniformly integrable martingale. 3

Dynamic point of view and density process Assume that immersion property holds under P. 1) Let the Radon-Nikodým density (Zt G,t ) be a pure jump martingale with only one jump at time τ. Then, the (F, P)-martingale (Zt F,t ) is the constant martingale equal to 1. Under Q, the intensity process is λ F,Q t = λ F z t (t) t,η(dt)-a.s., and the immersion property still z t holds. 2) The only changes of probability measure compatible with immersion property have Radon-Nikodým densities that are the product of a pure jump positive martingale with only one jump at time τ, and a positive F-martingale. 31

Modelling of density process Modelling of density process 32

Modelling of density process HJM framework and short rate models To model the family of density processes we make references to the classical interest rate models. We suppose in what follows that F is a Brownian filtration. See D.C. Brody and L. Hugston (21) for related approach 33

Modelling of density process Suppose that for any θ, the bounded martingale (G t (θ),t ) satisfies dg t (θ) =Z t (θ)dw t where (Z t (θ),t ) is an F-predictable process. If the process z t (θ) such that Z t (θ) = θ z t(u)η(du) is bounded by an integrable process, then 1. dα t (θ) = z t (θ)dw t. 2. The martingale part in the Doob-Meyer decomposition of G is given by Mt F =1 Z s(s)dw s. See D.C. Brody and L. Hugston (21) for related approach 34

Modelling of density process Proof: 1) is obvious by definition. 2) is obtained by using previous results and integration by part, in fact, ( s ) Wt F =1 η(du) z s (u)dw s =1 dw s z s (u)η(du). u Observe in addition that Z t () = since G t () = 1 for any t, which implies 2) See D.C. Brody and L. Hugston (21) for related approach 35

Modelling of density process We can also consider (G t (θ),t ) in the classical HJM models where its dynamics is given in multiplicative form. We also deduce the dynamics of the forward rate, in both forward and backward forms. The density can then be calculated as α t (θ) =λ t (θ)g t (θ). See D.C. Brody and L. Hugston (21) for related approach 36

Modelling of density process For any t, θ, let Ψ(t, θ) = Z t(θ) G t (θ) and define ψ(t, θ) by Ψ(t, θ) = θ ψ(t, u)η(du). Recall the forward rate λ t(θ) ofτ given by λ t (θ) = θ ln G t (θ). Then 1. G t (θ) =G (θ)exp ( Ψ(s, θ)dw s 1 2 Ψ(s, θ) 2 ds) ; 2. λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds; ( 3. G t =exp λf sη(ds)+ Ψ(s, s)dw s 1 t 2 ds) Ψ(s, s) 2 ; dg t (θ) =Z t (θ)dw t 37

Modelling of density process For any t, θ, let Ψ(t, θ) = Z t(θ) G t (θ) and define ψ(t, θ) by Ψ(t, θ) = θ ψ(t, u)η(du). Recall the forward rate λ t(θ) ofτ given by λ t (θ) = θ ln G t (θ). Then 1. G t (θ) =G (θ)exp ( Ψ(s, θ)dw s 1 2 Ψ(s, θ) 2 ds) ; 2. λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds; ( 3. G t =exp λf sη(ds)+ Ψ(s, s)dw ) s 1 t 2 Ψ(s, s) 2 d s ; dg t (θ) =Z t (θ)dw t 38

Modelling of density process For any t, θ, let Ψ(t, θ) = Z t(θ) G t (θ) and define ψ(t, θ) by Ψ(t, θ) = θ ψ(t, u)η(du). Recall the forward rate λ t(θ) ofτ given by λ t (θ) = θ ln G t (θ). Then 1. G t (θ) =G (θ)exp ( Ψ(s, θ)dw s 1 2 Ψ(s, θ) 2 ds) ; 2. λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds; ( 3. G t =exp λf sη(ds)+ Ψ(s, s)dw s 1 t 2 ds) Ψ(s, s) 2 ; dg t (θ) =Z t (θ)dw t 39

Modelling of density process For any t, θ, let Ψ(t, θ) = Z t(θ) G t (θ) and define ψ(t, θ) by Ψ(t, θ) = θ ψ(t, u)η(du). Recall the forward rate λ t(θ) ofτ given by λ t (θ) = θ ln G t (θ). Then 1. G t (θ) =G (θ)exp ( Ψ(s, θ)dw s 1 2 Ψ(s, θ) 2 ds) ; 2. λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds; ( 3. G t =exp λf sη(ds)+ Ψ(s, s)dw s 1 t 2 ds) Ψ(s, s) 2 ; dg t (θ) =Z t (θ)dw t 4

Modelling of density process Proof: The process G t (θ) is the solution of the equation dg t (θ) G t (θ) =Ψ(t, θ)dw t, t, θ. Hence 1), from which we deduce immediately 2) by differentiation w.r.t. θ. Now, note that by 1), ln G t = λ (s)η(ds)+ Ψ(s, t)dw s 1 2 Ψ(s, t) 2 ds 41

Modelling of density process Woreover, we have by 2) that λ s (s)η(ds) = = + λ (s)η(ds) η(ds) s λ (s)η(ds) η(ds) s ψ(u, s)ψ(u, s) du + 1 2 ( Ψ(u, t) 2 ψ(u, s)dw u (Ψ(u, t) Ψ(u, u))dw u Ψ(u, u) 2 )du. Observe in addition that by definition of the forward rate λ t (θ) and then, we have λ s (s) =λ F s, which implies 3). Finally, 4) is a direct result from 2). As a conditional survival probability, G t (θ) is decreasing on θ, whichis equivalent to that λ t (θ) is positive. This condition is similar as for the zero coupon bond prices. 42

Modelling of density process In the second approach, we can borrow short rate models for the F-intensity λ F of τ, and then obtain the dynamics of conditional probability G t (T )fort t. The monotonicity condition of G t (T )ont is equivalent to the positivity condition on λ F. 43

Modelling of density process Example: The non-negativity of λ is satisfied if for any θ, the process ψ(θ)ψ(θ) is non negative, or if ψ(θ) is non negative; for any θ, the local martingale ζ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ s(θ)dw s is a Doléans-Dade exponential of some martingale, i.e., is solution of ζ t (θ) =λ (θ)+ ζ s (θ)b s (θ)dw s, that is, if ψ s(θ)dw s = b s(θ)ζ s (θ)dw s. Here the initial condition is a positive constant λ (θ). λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds 44

Modelling of density process Hence, we set ( ψ t (θ) = b t (θ)ζ t (θ) = b t (θ)λ (θ)exp b s (θ)dw s 1 2 ) b 2 s(θ)ds where λ is a positive intensity function and b(θ) is a non-positive F-adapted process. Then, the family ( α t (θ) =λ t (θ)exp where θ ) λ t (v) dv, λ t (θ) =λ (θ) satisfies the required assumptions. ψ s (θ) dw s + ψ s (θ)ψ s (θ) ds λ t (θ) =λ (θ) ψ(s, θ)dw s + ψ(s, θ)ψ(s, θ) ds 45

Modelling of density process Other examples 46

Modelling of density process Example: Cox-like construction. Here λ is a non-negative F-adapted process, Λ t = λ sds Θ is a given r.v. independent of F with unit exponential law V is a F -measurable non-negative random variable τ =inf{t :Λ t ΘV }. For any θ and t, G t (θ) =P(τ >θ F t )=P(Λ θ < ΘV F t )=P ( exp Λ θ V e Θ ) F t. Let us denote exp( Λ t /V )=1 ψ sds, with ψ s =(λ s /V )exp s (λ u /V ) du, and define γ t (s) =E (ψ s F t ). Then, α t (s) =γ t (s)/γ (s). 47

Modelling of density process Backward construction of the density Let ϕ(,α) be a family of densities on R +, depending of some parameter and X F a random variable. Then and we can chose ϕ(u, X)du =1 α t (u) =E(α (u) F t )=E(ϕ(u, X) F t ) 48

Modelling of density process Other example Let β(θ) be a family of non negative F-martingales with expectation equal to 1 and set where L β t = β t (θ)η(dθ). dβ t (θ) =β t (θ)σ t (θ)dw t α t (θ) = β t(θ) L β t Then, α is a family of densities under Q with dq = L β t dp and dα t (θ) =α t (θ)(σ t (θ) σ t )(dw t σ t dt) where σ t = 1 β L β t (θ)σ t (θ)η(dθ). Note the similarity with normalized t and non-normalized filter. See also Brody and Hughston. 49

Multidefaults Multidefaults Computation of prices in case of multidefaults is now easy In a first step, one orders the default Computation before the first default are done in the reference filtration Between the first and the second default, one takes as new reference filtration the filtration generated by the first default and the previous reference filtration, as explained previously for the after default computations and we continue till the end 5

Multidefaults Let τ = τ 1 τ 2 andσ = τ 1 τ 2 and assume that G t (θ 1,θ 2 ):=P(τ >θ 1,σ >θ 2 F t )= α t (u, v)dη(u, v). θ 1 θ 2 The F-density of τ is given by α τ F t (θ 1 )= θ 1 α t (θ 1,v)η 2 (dv), a.s.. For any θ 2,t, the G (1) -density of σ is given by α α σ G(1) t t (u, θ 2 )η 1 (du) t (θ 2 )=1 {τ>t} G τ F t (t) +1 {τ t} α t (τ,θ 2 ) α τ F t (τ), a.s.. 51

Multidefaults Begin at the beginning, and go on till you come to the end. Then,... Lewis Carroll, Alice s Adventures in Wonderland. 52

Multidefaults Begin at the beginning, and go on till you come to the end. Then, stop. Lewis Carroll, Alice s Adventures in Wonderland. 53

Multidefaults THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 54