Saturated fusion systems with parabolic families

Similar documents
arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 4 Jul 2018

Fusion systems and self equivalences of p-completed classifying spaces of finite groups of Lie type

Homework 2 /Solutions

Fusion Systems On Finite Groups and Alperin s Theorem

AN ALGEBRAIC MODEL FOR FINITE LOOP SPACES

Chapter One. Affine Coxeter Diagrams

Buildings. Brian Lehmann Cambridge University Part III May Graduate Research Fellowship.

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Math 250A, Fall 2004 Problems due October 5, 2004 The problems this week were from Lang s Algebra, Chapter I.

Burnside rings and fusion systems

arxiv: v3 [math.gr] 29 Oct 2013

FOCAL SUBGROUPS OF FUSION SYSTEMS AND CHARACTERS OF HEIGHT ZERO

REDUCED, TAME, AND EXOTIC FUSION SYSTEMS

In the special case where Y = BP is the classifying space of a finite p-group, we say that f is a p-subgroup inclusion.

Lecture 6: Etale Fundamental Group

Bruhat-Tits Buildings

Abstract Algebra II Groups ( )

its image and kernel. A subgroup of a group G is a non-empty subset K of G such that k 1 k 1

2 BOB OLIVER AND JOANA VENTURA Another problem is that in general, when e L is a linking system and A C e L, then e L can be thought of as an extensio

GROUP ACTIONS EMMANUEL KOWALSKI

The number of simple modules associated to Sol(q)

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

φ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b) φ(a b) = φ(a) φ(b),

Exercises on chapter 1

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

INTRODUCTION TO FUSION SYSTEMS

6 More on simple groups Lecture 20: Group actions and simplicity Lecture 21: Simplicity of some group actions...

3. G. Groups, as men, will be known by their actions. - Guillermo Moreno

REALIZING A FUSION SYSTEM BY A SINGLE FINITE GROUP

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 4 Jun 2015

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

On Fixed Point Sets and Lefschetz Modules for Sporadic Simple Groups

INTRODUCTION TO FUSION SYSTEMS. Markus Linckelmann

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

Frank Moore Algebra 901 Notes Professor: Tom Marley Direct Products of Groups:

Math 594, HW2 - Solutions

arxiv: v3 [math.at] 21 Dec 2010

Reduced fusion systems over 2-groups of sectional rank at most 4. Bob Oliver

HOMEWORK Graduate Abstract Algebra I May 2, 2004

Two subgroups and semi-direct products

QUIVERS AND LATTICES.

Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings

Groups and Symmetries

A characterisation of p-soluble groups

FUSION SYSTEMS IN ALGEBRA AND TOPOLOGY MICHAEL ASCHBACHER, RADHA KESSAR, AND BOB OLIVER

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

Adjoint Representations of the Symmetric Group

Pseudo Sylow numbers

Theorems and Definitions in Group Theory

Representations and Linear Actions

Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018

On exceptional completions of symmetric varieties

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

II. Products of Groups

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Teddy Einstein Math 4320

Extra exercises for algebra

Quiz 2 Practice Problems

THE ABELIAN MONOID OF FUSION-STABLE FINITE SETS IS FREE

Solutions to Assignment 4

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 23 Nov 2009

12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold.

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN

Most rank two finite groups act freely on a homotopy product of two spheres

Factorization in Polynomial Rings

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5824 Topics in Groups. Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation

Selected exercises from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote (3rd edition).

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURES NOTES 5: SUBGROUPS, CONJUGACY, NORMALITY, QUOTIENT GROUPS, AND EXTENSIONS.

REDUCED FUSION SYSTEMS ON SYLOW 3-SUBGROUPS OF THE MCLAUGHLIN GROUP

EXERCISES ON THE OUTER AUTOMORPHISMS OF S 6

HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC DOMAINS. 1. Introduction

for all i = 1,..., k and we are done.

Nick Gill. 13th July Joint with Hunt (USW) and Spiga (Milano Bicocca).

1 Categorical Background

Maximal non-commuting subsets of groups

The Outer Automorphism of S 6

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 23 May 2018

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

MTH Abstract Algebra II S17. Review for the Final Exam. Part I

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 5: HOMOMORPHISMS, ISOMORPHISMS, SUBGROUPS, QUOTIENT ( FACTOR ) GROUPS. ANDREW SALCH

EXERCISE SHEET 2 WITH SOLUTIONS

Kent Regional Algebra Weekend April 2011 Schedule. Saturday 16 April

MATH 1530 ABSTRACT ALGEBRA Selected solutions to problems. a + b = a + b,

CLASSIFICATION OF GROUPS OF ORDER 60 Alfonso Gracia Saz

if G permutes the set of its subgroups by conjugation then Stab G (H) = N G (H),

The Segre Embedding. Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006

MATH 436 Notes: Cyclic groups and Invariant Subgroups.

ON BASE SIZES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Independent generating sets and geometries for symmetric groups

COUNTING INVOLUTIONS. Michael Aschbacher, Ulrich Meierfrankenfeld, and Bernd Stellmacher

15 Permutation representations and G-sets

Algebraic Geometry: Limits and Colimits

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2

Groups. Chapter The symmetric group

Finite Subgroups of Gl 2 (C) and Universal Deformation Rings

EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF LINKING SYSTEMS: CHERMAK S PROOF VIA OBSTRUCTION THEORY

Transcription:

Saturated fusion systems with parabolic families Silvia Onofrei The Ohio State University AMS Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19-21 October 2013

Basics on Fusion Systems A fusion system F over a finite p-group S is a category whose: objects are the subgroups of S, morphisms are such that Hom S (P,Q) Hom F (P,Q) Inj(P,Q), every F -morphism factors as an F -isomorphism followed by an inclusion. Let F be a fusion system over a finite p-group S. A subgroup P of S is fully F -normalized if N S (P) N S (ϕ(p)), for all ϕ Hom F (P,S); F -centric if C S (ϕ(p)) = Z(ϕ(P)) for all ϕ Hom F (P,S); F -essential if Q is F -centric and S p (Out F (P)) = S p (Aut F (P)/Aut P (P)) is disconnected. The fusion system F over a finite p-group S is saturated if the following hold: Sylow Axiom Extension Axiom The normalizer of P in F is the fusion system N F (P) on N S (P) ϕ Hom N F (Q,R) if ϕ Hom F (PQ,PR) with ϕ(p) = P and ϕ Q = ϕ. The fusion system F is constrained if F = N F (Q) for some F -centric subgroup Q 1 of S. The group G has (finite) Sylow p-subgroup S if S is a finite p-subgroup of G and if every finite p-subgroup of G is conjugate to a subgroup of S. F S (G) is the fusion system on S with Hom F (P,Q) = Hom G (P,Q), for P,Q S. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 1/10

Basics on Chamber Systems 1 A chamber system over a set I is a nonempty set C whose elements are called chambers together with a family of equivalence relations ( i ;i I) on C indexed by I. 2 The i-panels are the equivalence classes with respect to i. 3 Two distinct chambers c and d are called i- adjacent if they are contained in the same i-panel: c i d 4 A gallery of length n connecting two chambers c 0 and c n is a sequence of chambers c 0 i1 c 1 i2... in 1 c n 1 in c n 5 The chamber system C is connected if any two chambers can be joined by a gallery. 6 The rank of the chamber system is the cardinality of the set I. 7 A morphism ϕ : C D between two chamber systems over I is a map on chambers that preserves i-adjacency: if c,d C and c i d then ϕ(c) i ϕ(d) in D. 8 Aut(C) is the group of all automorphisms of C (automorphism has the obvious meaning). 9 If G is a group of automorphisms of C then orbit chamber system C/G is a chamber system over I. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 2/10

Fusion Systems with Parabolic Families A fusion system F over a finite p-group S has a family {F i ;i I} of parabolic subsystems if: (F0) i I, F i is saturated, constrained, of F i -essential rank one; (F1) B := N F (S) is a proper subsystem of F i for all i I; (F2) F = F i ;i I and no proper subset {F j ;j J I} generates F ; (F3) F i F j = B for any pair of distinct elements F i and F j ; (F4) F ij := F i,f j is saturated constrained subsystem of F for all i,j I. Proposition (Onofrei, 2011) If F contains a family of parabolic subsystems then there are: p -reduced p-constrained finite groups B,G i,g ij with B = F S (B), F i = F S (G i ), F ij = F S (G ij ), i,j I; injective homomorphisms ψ i : B G i, ψ ij : G i G ij such that ψ ji ψ j = ψ ij ψ i, i,j I. In other words, A = {(B,G i,g ij ),(ψ i,ψ ij ); i,j I} is a diagram of groups. The proof is based on: [BCGLO, 2005]: Every saturated constrained fusion system F over S is the fusion system F S (G) of a finite group G that is p -reduced O p (G) = 1 and p-constrained C G (O p (G)) O p (G), and if we set U := O p (F ) then 1 Z(U) G Aut F (U) 1. [Aschbacher, 2008]: If G 1 and G 2 are such that F = F S (G 1 ) = F S (G 2 ) then there is an isomorphism ϕ : G 1 G 2 with ϕ S = Id S. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 3/10

Fusion - Chamber System Pairs Lemma (Onofrei, 2011) If G is a faithful completion of the diagram of groups A then: (P1) G := G i,i I = G j,j J I (P2) G i G j = B for all i j in I; (P3) B G i for all i I; (P4) g G B g = 1. Hence (G;B,G i,i I) is a parabolic system of rank n = I. The chamber system C = C(G;B,G i,i I) is defined as follows: the chambers are cosets gb for g G; two chambers gb and hb are i-adjacent if gg i = hg i where g,h G. G acts chamber transitively, faithfully on C by left multiplication. Definition (Onofrei, 2011) A fusion - chamber system pair (F,C) consists of: a fusion system F with a family of parabolic subsystems {F i ;i I}; a chamber system C = C(G;B,G i,i I) with G a faithful completion of A. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 4/10

Main Theorem on Fusion - Chamber System Pairs Theorem (Onofrei, 2011) Let (F, C) be a fusion-chamber system pair. Assume the following hold. (i). C P is connected for all p-subgroups P of G. (ii). If P is F -centric and if R is a p-subgroup of Aut G (P), then (C P /C G (P)) R is connected. Then F = F S (G) is a saturated fusion system over S. Sketch of the Argument Step 1: S is a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Since C P is connected, C P /0 and g G such that gb C P, thus P gbg 1 and since gsg 1 Syl p (gbg 1 ), h G such that hph 1 S. Step 2: F is the fusion system given by conjugation in G, this means F = F S (G). Clearly F F S (G). F S (G) F follows from the fact that every morphism in F S (G) is a composite of morphisms ϕ 1,...,ϕ n with ϕ i F S (G ji ), j i I. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 5/10

Main Theorem: Sketch of the Argument Step 3: Every morphism in F is a composition of restrictions of morphisms between F -centric subgroups. Recall F i is saturated, constrained and of essential rank one. If E i is F i -essential then E i is F -centric. Alperin-Goldschmidt Theorem: Each morphism ϕ i F i can be written as a composition of restrictions of F i -automorphisms of S and of automorphisms of fully F i -normalized F i -essential subgroups of S. Hence we may use: [BCGLO, 2005]: It suffices to verify the saturation axioms for the collection of F -centric subgroups only. Step 4: The Sylow Axiom: For all F -centric P that are fully F -normalized, Aut S (P) Syl p (Aut F (P)). Proposition [Stancu, 2004]: Assume that Aut S (S) is a Sylow p-subgroup of Aut F (S); The Extension Axiom holds for all F -centric subgroups P. Then if Q is F -centric and fully F -normalized then Aut S (Q) is a Sylow p-subgroup of Aut F (Q). Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 6/10

Main Theorem: Sketch of the Argument Step 5: The Extension Axiom: Let P be F -centric. For any ϕ Hom F (P,S) there is a morphism ϕ Hom F (N ϕ,s) such that ϕ P = ϕ. PC S (P) N ϕ N S (P) For P S we introduce a new chamber system Rep(P,C) as follows: The chambers are the elements of Rep(P,B) := Inn(B) \ Inj(P,B); [α] Rep(P,B) denotes the class of α Inj(P,B) The i-panels are represented by the elements of Rep(P,B,G i ) := {[γ] Rep(P,G i ) : γ Inj(P,G i ) with γ(p) B}. Let τ K H denote the inclusion map of the group H into the group K. [ ] [ ] Two chambers [α] and [β] are i-adjacent if τ G i B α = τ G i B β in Rep(P,G i ). N G (P) acts on Rep(P,C) via g [α] = [α c g 1 ] for g N G (P). Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 7/10

Main Theorem: Sketch of the Argument There is an N G (P)-equivariant chamber system isomorphism f P : C P Rep(P,C) 0 given by f P (gb) = [c g 1 ] that induces an isomorphism on the orbit chamber systems C P /C G (P) Rep(P,C) 0 where Rep(P,C) 0 is the connected component of Rep(P,C) that contains [τ B P ], affords the action of Aut G (P) = N G (P)/C G (P). For ϕ Hom F (P,S) let K = N ϕ /Z(P) = Aut Nϕ (P). The map Γ : Rep(N ϕ,c) 0 Rep(P,C) K 0 ( C P /C G (P) ) K is onto. that is induced by the restriction N ϕ P between the connected component of Rep(N ϕ,c) that contains [τ B N ϕ ] and the fixed point set of K acting on Rep(P,C) 0 Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 8/10

Main Theorem: Sketch of the Argument There is an N G (P)-equivariant chamber system isomorphism f P : C P Rep(P,C) 0 given by f P (gb) = [c g 1 ] that induces an isomorphism on the orbit chamber systems C P /C G (P) Rep(P,C) 0 where Rep(P,C) 0 is the connected component of Rep(P,C) that contains [τ B P ], affords the action of Aut G (P) = N G (P)/C G (P). For ϕ Hom F (P,S) let K = N ϕ /Z(P) = Aut Nϕ (P). The map Γ : Rep(N ϕ,c) 0 Rep(P,C) K 0 ( C P /C G (P) ) K is onto. that is induced by the restriction N ϕ P between the connected component of Rep(N ϕ,c) that contains [τ B N ϕ ] and the fixed point set of K acting on Rep(P,C) 0 Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 8/10

An Application: Fusion Systems with Classical Parabolic Families Assume F contains a family of parabolic systems. Set U i = O p (F i ) and U ij = O p (F ij ). We say F contains a classical family of parabolic systems with diagram M if: For each i I, Out Fi (U i ) is a rank one finite group of Lie type in characteristic p. For each pair i,j I, Out Fij (U ij ) is either a rank two finite group of Lie type in characteristic p or it is a (central) product of two rank one finite groups of Lie type in characteristic p. The diagram M is a graph whose vertices are labeled by the elements of I, Out Fij (U ij ) is a product of two rank one Lie groups then the nodes i and j are not connected, Out Fij (U ij ) is a rank two Lie group the nodes i and j are connected by a bond of strength m ij 2, where m ij denotes the integer that defines the Weyl group. Proposition Let (F,C) be a fusion-chamber system pair with I 3. Assume that: (i). F contains a classical family of parabolic systems with diagram M ; (ii). M is a spherical diagram. Then F is the fusion system of a finite simple group of Lie type in characteristic p extended by diagonal and field automorphisms. Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 9/10

Thank You The End Fall Central Sectional Meeting, Saint Louis, Missouri, 19 October 2013 10/10