Convex optimization examples

Similar documents
Lecture 4: Linear and quadratic problems

Example 1 linear elastic structure; forces f 1 ;:::;f 100 induce deections d 1 ;:::;d f i F max i, several hundred other constraints: max load p

EE364 Review Session 4

Applications of Robust Optimization in Signal Processing: Beamforming and Power Control Fall 2012

Final exam.

CHAPTER 3 ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING

Exercises. Exercises. Basic terminology and optimality conditions. 4.2 Consider the optimization problem

Tutorial on Convex Optimization: Part II

Optimization in. Stephen Boyd. 3rd SIAM Conf. Control & Applications. and Control Theory. System. Convex

Efficient Computation of the Pareto Boundary for the Two-User MISO Interference Channel with Multi-User Decoding Capable Receivers

ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING BASED ON CO- VARIANCE MATRIX RECONSTRUCTION FOR LOOK DIRECTION MISMATCH

Convex optimization problems. Optimization problem in standard form

Disciplined Convex Programming

Introduction to Convex Optimization

EE5138R: Problem Set 5 Assigned: 16/02/15 Due: 06/03/15

ELEC E7210: Communication Theory. Lecture 10: MIMO systems

Lecture 1 Introduction and overview

COM Optimization for Communications 8. Semidefinite Programming

Array Antennas. Chapter 6

Linear Optimum Filtering: Statement

Optimization in Wireless Communication

On the complexity of maximizing the minimum Shannon capacity in wireless networks by joint channel assignment and power allocation

Trust Degree Based Beamforming for Multi-Antenna Cooperative Communication Systems

J. Liang School of Automation & Information Engineering Xi an University of Technology, China

New Rank-One Matrix Decomposition Techniques and Applications to Signal Processing

Convex Functions. Daniel P. Palomar. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)

Beamspace Adaptive Beamforming and the GSC

Agenda. 1 Cone programming. 2 Convex cones. 3 Generalized inequalities. 4 Linear programming (LP) 5 Second-order cone programming (SOCP)

4. Convex optimization problems

INTERIOR-POINT METHODS ROBERT J. VANDERBEI JOINT WORK WITH H. YURTTAN BENSON REAL-WORLD EXAMPLES BY J.O. COLEMAN, NAVAL RESEARCH LAB

Multiuser Downlink Beamforming: Rank-Constrained SDP

Convex Optimization and Modeling

Response Vector Constrained Robust LCMV. Beamforming Based on Semidefinite Programming

EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam

A Minimax Theorem with Applications to Machine Learning, Signal Processing, and Finance

SINR Balancing in the Downlink of Cognitive Radio Networks with Imperfect Channel Knowledge

Overview of Beamforming

L interférence dans les réseaux non filaires

Lecture: Convex Optimization Problems

EE364a: Convex Optimization I March or March 15 16, Final Exam

DYNAMICS OF SERIAL ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS

ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. SPATIAL BF

4. Convex optimization problems

CMSC 451: Lecture 7 Greedy Algorithms for Scheduling Tuesday, Sep 19, 2017

Near Optimal Adaptive Robust Beamforming

A ROBUST BEAMFORMER BASED ON WEIGHTED SPARSE CONSTRAINT

4. Convex optimization problems (part 1: general)

On Solving SOCPs with an Interior-Point Method for NLP

IPAM Summer School Optimization methods for machine learning. Jorge Nocedal

DOWNLINK transmit beamforming has recently received

Course Outline. FRTN10 Multivariable Control, Lecture 13. General idea for Lectures Lecture 13 Outline. Example 1 (Doyle Stein, 1979)

Exam Spring Embedded Systems. Prof. L. Thiele

Research Article Robust STAP for MIMO Radar Based on Direct Data Domain Approach

Electromagnetic Waves

Research Article Optimal Spatial Matrix Filter Design for Array Signal Preprocessing

Physics 142 Wave Optics 1 Page 1. Wave Optics 1. For every complex problem there is one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L.

WIDEBAND STAP (WB-STAP) FOR PASSIVE SONAR. J. R. Guerci. Deputy Director DARPA/SPO Arlington, VA

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1559

Date: 1 April (1) The only reference material you may use is one 8½x11 crib sheet and a calculator.

Architectures and Algorithms for Distributed Generation Control of Inertia-Less AC Microgrids

The Q-parametrization (Youla) Lecture 13: Synthesis by Convex Optimization. Lecture 13: Synthesis by Convex Optimization. Example: Spring-mass System

Capacity Region of the Two-Way Multi-Antenna Relay Channel with Analog Tx-Rx Beamforming

Resonance on String. Weight Box Sine wave generator Mass Holder

EE363 homework 8 solutions

Minimum Mean Squared Error Interference Alignment

Module 7 : Antenna. Lecture 52 : Array Synthesis. Objectives. In this course you will learn the following. Array specified by only its nulls.

Date: 31 March (1) The only reference material you may use is one 8½x11 crib sheet and a calculator.

Multi-objective Optimization and Pareto optimality

Characterization of Convex and Concave Resource Allocation Problems in Interference Coupled Wireless Systems

Controlled Diffusions and Hamilton-Jacobi Bellman Equations

Distributed Computation of Minimum Time Consensus for Multi-Agent Systems

CS 6901 (Applied Algorithms) Lecture 3

An Adaptive Sensor Array Using an Affine Combination of Two Filters

Novel spectrum sensing schemes for Cognitive Radio Networks

PHYSICS 149: Lecture 22

1 Introduction. 2 Successive Convexification Algorithm

ORF 363/COS 323 Final Exam, Fall 2015

FRTN10 Multivariable Control, Lecture 13. Course outline. The Q-parametrization (Youla) Example: Spring-mass System

Beamforming. A brief introduction. Brian D. Jeffs Associate Professor Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham Young University

ELE539A: Optimization of Communication Systems Lecture 16: Pareto Optimization and Nonconvex Optimization

Laplacian Filters. Sobel Filters. Laplacian Filters. Laplacian Filters. Laplacian Filters. Laplacian Filters

Transmit Beamforming Techniques for Wireless Information and Power Transfer in MISO Interference Channels

Sequential Convex Programming

EE236A Linear Programming Exercises. Prof. L. Vandenberghe Electrical Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles

A Probabilistic Downlink Beamforming Approach with Multiplicative and Additive Channel Errors

Convex Optimization. Prof. Nati Srebro. Lecture 12: Infeasible-Start Newton s Method Interior Point Methods

Lecture: Examples of LP, SOCP and SDP

Lecture 2: Convex functions

III. Spherical Waves and Radiation

Chapter 13. Hooke s Law: F = - kx Periodic & Simple Harmonic Motion Springs & Pendula Waves Superposition. Next Week!

NEW ZEALAND SCHOLARSHIP 2004 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE FOR PHYSICS

8. Geometric problems

Acoustic Source Separation with Microphone Arrays CCNY

Algorithm-Hardware Co-Optimization of Memristor-Based Framework for Solving SOCP and Homogeneous QCQP Problems

Lecture 36 Date:

Convex Optimization in Communications and Signal Processing

Yell if you have any questions

A Unified Approach to the Design of Interpolated and Frequency Response Masking FIR Filters

Wave Propagation in Uniaxial Media. Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces

ELE539A: Optimization of Communication Systems Lecture 6: Quadratic Programming, Geometric Programming, and Applications

Transcription:

Convex optimization examples multi-period processor speed scheduling minimum time optimal control grasp force optimization optimal broadcast transmitter power allocation phased-array antenna beamforming optimal receiver location 1

Multi-period processor speed scheduling processor adjusts its speed s t [s min,s max ] in each of T time periods energy consumed in period t is φ(s t ); total energy is E = T t=1 φ(s t) n jobs job i available at t = A i ; must finish by deadline t = D i job i requires total work W i 0 θ ti 0 is fraction of processor effort allocated to job i in period t 1 T θ t = 1, D i t=a i θ ti s t W i choose speeds s t and allocations θ ti to minimize total energy E 2

Minimum energy processor speed scheduling work with variables S ti = θ ti s t solve convex problem s t = n S ti, i=1 D i t=a i S ti W i minimize E = T t=1 φ(s t) subject to s min s t s max, t = 1,...,T s t = n i=1 S ti, t = 1,...,T Di t=a i S ti W i, i = 1,...,n a convex problem when φ is convex can recover θ t as θ ti = (1/s t)s ti 3

Example T = 16 periods, n = 12 jobs s min = 1, s max = 6, φ(s t ) = s 2 t jobs shown as bars over [A i,d i ] with area W i 40 35 12 30 10 25 8 φ(st) 20 job i 6 15 4 10 5 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s t 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 t 4

Optimal and uniform schedules uniform schedule: S ti = W i /(D i A i +1); gives E unif = 204.3 optimal schedule: S ti ; gives E = 167.1 6 optimal 6 uniform 5 5 4 4 st 3 st 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 t 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 t 5

Minimum-time optimal control linear dynamical system: x t+1 = Ax t +Bu t, t = 0,1,...,K, x 0 = x init inputs constraints: u min u t u max, t = 0,1,...,K minimum time to reach state x des : f(u 0,...,u K ) = min{t x t = x des for T t K +1} 6

state transfer time f is quasiconvex function of (u 0,...,u K ): f(u 0,u 1,...,u K ) T if and only if for all t = T,...,K +1 x t = A t x init +A t 1 Bu 0 + +Bu t 1 = x des i.e., sublevel sets are affine minimum-time optimal control problem: minimize f(u 0,u 1,...,u K ) subject to u min u t u max, t = 0,...,K with variables u 0,...,u K a quasiconvex problem; can be solved via bisection 7

Minimum-time control example u 1 u 2 force (u t ) 1 moves object modeled as 3 masses (2 vibration modes) force (u t ) 2 used for active vibration suppression goal: move object to commanded position as quickly as possible, with (u t ) 1 1, (u t ) 2 0.1, t = 0,...,K 8

Ignoring vibration modes treat object as single mass; apply only u 1 analytical ( bang-bang ) solution 3 1 2.5 2 (ut)1 0.5 0 0.5 (xt)3 1.5 1 0.5 (ut)2 1 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 0 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 0.1 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 9

With vibration modes no analytical solution a quasiconvex problem; solved using bisection 3 1 2.5 2 (ut)1 0.5 0 0.5 (xt)3 1.5 1 0.5 (ut)2 1 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 0 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 0.1 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 t 10

Grasp force optimization choose K grasping forces on object resist external wrench respect friction cone constraints minimize maximum grasp force convex problem (second-order cone program): minimize max i f (i) 2 max contact force subject to i Q(i) f (i) = f ext force equillibrium i p(i) (Q (i) f (i) ) = τ ext torque equillibrium ( ) 1/2 µ i f (i) 3 f (i)2 1 +f (i)2 2 friction cone constraints variables f (i) R 3, i = 1,...,K (contact forces) 11

Example 12

Optimal broadcast transmitter power allocation m transmitters, mn receivers all at same frequency transmitter i wants to transmit to n receivers labeled (i,j), j = 1,...,n A ijk is path gain from transmitter k to receiver (i,j) N ij is (self) noise power of receiver (i,j) variables: transmitter powers p k, k = 1,...,m transmitter k receiver (i, j) transmitter i 13

at receiver (i, j): signal power: S ij = A iji p i noise plus interference power: I ij = k ia ijk p k +N ij signal to interference/noise ratio (SINR): S ij /I ij problem: choose p i to maximize smallest SINR: A iji p maximize min i i,j k i A ijkp k +N ij subject to 0 p i p max... a (generalized) linear fractional program 14

Phased-array antenna beamforming (x i,y i ) θ omnidirectional antenna elements at positions (x 1,y 1 ),..., (x n,y n ) unit plane wave incident from angle θ induces in ith element a signal e j(x icosθ+y i sinθ ωt) (j = 1, frequency ω, wavelength 2π) 15

demodulate to get output e j(x icosθ+y i sinθ) C linearly combine with complex weights w i : y(θ) = n w i e j(x icosθ+y i sinθ) i=1 y(θ) is (complex) antenna array gain pattern y(θ) gives sensitivity of array as function of incident angle θ depends on design variables Rew, Imw (called antenna array weights or shading coefficients) design problem: choose w to achieve desired gain pattern 16

Sidelobe level minimization make y(θ) small for θ θ tar > α (θ tar : target direction; 2α: beamwidth) via least-squares (discretize angles) minimize i y(θ i) 2 subject to y(θ tar ) = 1 (sum is over angles outside beam) least-squares problem with two (real) linear equality constraints 17

y(θ) 50 θ tar = 30 sidelobe level 10 18

minimize sidelobe level (discretize angles) (max over angles outside beam) minimize max i y(θ i ) subject to y(θ tar ) = 1 can be cast as SOCP minimize t subject to y(θ i ) t y(θ tar ) = 1 19

y(θ) 50 θ tar = 30 sidelobe level 10 20

convex (& quasiconvex) extensions: y(θ 0 ) = 0 (null in direction θ 0 ) w is real (amplitude only shading) Extensions w i 1 (attenuation only shading) minimize σ 2 n i=1 w i 2 (thermal noise power in y) minimize beamwidth given a maximum sidelobe level nonconvex extension: maximize number of zero weights 21

Optimal receiver location N transmitter frequencies 1,...,N transmitters at locations a i, b i R 2 use frequency i transmitters at a 1, a 2,..., a N are the wanted ones transmitters at b 1, b 2,..., b N are interfering receiver at position x R 2 b 3 a 3 x a 2 b 2 a 1 b 1 22

(signal) receiver power from a i : x a i α 2 (α 2.1) (interfering) receiver power from b i : x b i α 2 (α 2.1) worst signal to interference ratio, over all frequencies, is x a i α 2 S/I = min i x b i α 2 what receiver location x maximizes S/I? 23

S/I is quasiconcave on {x S/I 1}, i.e., on {x x a i 2 x b i 2, i = 1,...,N} b 3 a 3 a 2 b 2 a 1 b 1 can use bisection; every iteration is a convex quadratic feasibility problem 24