ACAE -- ESTUDIO PILOTO DE DIAGNÓSTICO DE FÍSICA DE ROCAS DEL YACIMIENTO CABALLOS EN LOS CAMPOS PUERTO COLON - LORO Y HORMIGA AREA SUR PUTUMAYO

Similar documents
Pressure and Compaction in the Rock Physics Space. Jack Dvorkin

Shear Wave Velocity Estimation Utilizing Wireline Logs for a Carbonate Reservoir, South-West Iran

Downloaded 11/02/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at Summary.

IDENTIFYING PATCHY SATURATION FROM WELL LOGS Short Note. / K s. + K f., G Dry. = G / ρ, (2)

Shaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication

The role of seismic modeling in Reservoir characterization: A case study from Crestal part of South Mumbai High field

We apply a rock physics analysis to well log data from the North-East Gulf of Mexico

BPM37 Linking Basin Modeling with Seismic Attributes through Rock Physics

Rock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation. for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea. R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.

AVO Attributes of a Deep Coal Seam

A Fast Method For Estimating Shear Wave Velocity By Using Neural Network

Estimating the hydrocarbon volume from elastic and resistivity data: A concept

Quick Look : Rule Of Thumb of Rock Properties in Deep Water, Krishna-Godavari Basin

ATTENUATION CHARACTERISTICS OF SAUDI ARABIAN RESERVOIR SANDSTONE AND LIMESTONE CORES

Simultaneous Inversion of Clastic Zubair Reservoir: Case Study from Sabiriyah Field, North Kuwait

Comparative Study of AVO attributes for Reservoir Facies Discrimination and Porosity Prediction

Competing Effect of Pore Fluid and Texture -- Case Study

The elastic properties such as velocity, density, impedance,

Crosswell tomography imaging of the permeability structure within a sandstone oil field.

Reservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes

Geological Classification of Seismic-Inversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad*

Some consideration about fluid substitution without shear wave velocity Fuyong Yan*, De-Hua Han, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston

RESEARCH PROPOSAL. Effects of scales and extracting methods on quantifying quality factor Q. Yi Shen

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Integrating rock physics modeling, prestack inversion and Bayesian classification. Brian Russell

GRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY. Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University ABSTRACT

Rock physics of a gas hydrate reservoir. Gas hydrates are solids composed of a hydrogen-bonded ROUND TABLE

Integration of rock attributes to discriminate Miocene reservoirs for heterogeneity and fluid variability

Rock Physics of Organic Shale and Its Implication

Downloaded 09/09/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION

Calibration of the petro-elastic model (PEM) for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel

Derived Rock Attributes Analysis for Enhanced Reservoir Fluid and Lithology Discrimination

THE USE OF SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES AND SPECTRAL DECOMPOSITION TO SUPPORT THE DRILLING PLAN OF THE URACOA-BOMBAL FIELDS

Delineating a sandstone reservoir at Pikes Peak, Saskatchewan using 3C seismic data and well logs

SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting

Use of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization

The Marrying of Petrophysics with Geophysics Results in a Powerful Tool for Independents Roger A. Young, eseis, Inc.

SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting. that the project results can correctly interpreted.

Geophysical model response in a shale gas

An empirical study of hydrocarbon indicators

Rock Physics of Shales and Source Rocks. Gary Mavko Professor of Geophysics Director, Stanford Rock Physics Project

Heriot-Watt University

PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION CORE COPYRIGHT. Petrophysical Evaluation Approach and Shaly Sands Evaluation. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

An overview of AVO and inversion

Statistical Rock Physics

Rock Physics Perturbational Modeling: Carbonate case study, an intracratonic basin Northwest/Saharan Africa

ROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES ABSTRACT

Characterization of Heterogeneities in Carbonates Ravi Sharma* and Manika Prasad, Colorado School of Mines

AFI (AVO Fluid Inversion)

RP04 Improved Seismic Inversion and Facies Using Regional Rock Physics Trends: Case Study from Central North Sea

Exploration / Appraisal of Shales. Petrophysics Technical Manager Unconventional Resources

A New AVO Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction and Application to the Marmousi II Dataset*

Geophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA

SPE These in turn can be used to estimate mechanical properties.

Lithology prediction and fluid discrimination in Block A6 offshore Myanmar

Bakken and Three Forks Logging Acquisition for Reservoir Characterization and Completion Optimization

Rock Physics & Formation Evaluation. Special Topic

Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.

Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion and Amplitude Versus Angle Modeling Reduces the Risk in Hydrocarbon Prospect Evaluation

Uncertainties in rock pore compressibility and effects on time lapse seismic modeling An application to Norne field

Geophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA

Pre-stack (AVO) and post-stack inversion of the Hussar low frequency seismic data

FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Generation of synthetic shear wave logs for multicomponent seismic interpretation

The relationship between elastic-wave velocities and density in sedimentary rocks: A proposal

Stochastic vs Deterministic Pre-stack Inversion Methods. Brian Russell

Sections Rock Physics Seminar Alejandra Rojas

Generating Vs from Vp sonic logs. David G. Schieck and Robert R. Stewart INTRODUCTION

AVO responses for varying Gas saturation sands A Possible Pathway in Reducing Exploration Risk

Seismic reservoir and source-rock analysis using inverse rock-physics modeling: A Norwegian Sea demonstration

Reservoir Characterization of Plover Lake Heavy-Oil Field

Downloaded 11/20/12 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Rock Physics Modeling in Montney Tight Gas Play

QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION

A look into Gassmann s Equation

OTC OTC PP. Abstract

Use of Seismic Inversion Attributes In Field Development Planning

PETROPHYSICAL WELLBORE INVERSION. TOTAL Emmanuel CAROLI, Peppino TERPOLILLI

SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting

Quantitative Interpretation

Downloaded 10/02/18 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Uncertainty analysis for the integration of seismic and CSEM data Myoung Jae Kwon & Roel Snieder, Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines

Poisson's Ration, Deep Resistivity and Water Saturation Relationships for Shaly Sand Reservoir, SE Sirt, Murzuq and Gadames Basins, Libya (Case study)

Recent advances in application of AVO to carbonate reservoirs: case histories

Summary. Simple model for kerogen maturity (Carcione, 2000)

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF AMPLITUDE VARIATION WITH OFFSET (AVO) IN FRACTURED MEDIA

SRC software. Rock physics modelling tools for analyzing and predicting geophysical reservoir properties

INTRODUCTION TO WELL LOGS And BAYES THEOREM

Rock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration

Keywords. PMR, Reservoir Characterization, EEI, LR

VELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh

Downloaded 02/05/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Downloaded 12/02/14 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Downloaded 08/14/14 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

AVO Crossplotting II: Examining Vp/Vs Behavior

V Sw =1 * V (1-S w ) 2* (V Sw =1 -V (1-Sw )) * (TWT 99 -TWT 94 ) under reservoir conditions (Rm 3 ) V Sw =1

Variety of Cementation Factor between Dolomite and Quartzite Reservoir

Effects of Fracture Parameters in an Anisotropy Model on P-Wave Azimuthal Amplitude Responses

Transcription:

ACAE -- ESTUDIO PILOTO DE DIAGNÓSTICO DE FÍSICA DE ROCAS DEL YACIMIENTO CABALLOS EN LOS CAMPOS PUERTO COLON - LORO Y HORMIGA AREA SUR PUTUMAYO PROBLEM: Provide a rational rock-physics basis for determining the lateral heterogeneity and reservoir quality in D in formation. Seismically discriminate massive blocky sands (e.g., ), from shaley sands (e.g., ). ACAE 0 ACAE 8A 0. 0. 0 0 00 00 0. 0 000 Permeability (md) 0 0 00 00 0. 0 000 Permeability (md) APPROACH: Rock physics analysis of ~ 0 well logs and 0 core plugs

U Reservoir Quality: and Permeability ACAE Case Study. 0.0 U 000 0..0 and Velocity 0. 0 AC0 U Permeability (md) 00 0 Unit Unit Unit Unit..0 U 0.7 0 00 0 00 000 Resistivity...6.8 RHOB...0. PhiRHO 0 00 0. Role of Clay () Acae 6 Acae 9 Hormiga A Loro 9D San-Miguel 6 60 0 0. 00 80 60 0. 0 0.0 0. 0. 0

ACAE Case Study. 6 POINTS OF REFERENCE: HAN'S DATASET 0. C = 0 C = -7% C = 8-% C = 8-% Vs (km/s) C = 0 C = -7% C = 8-% C = 8-% Poisson's Ratio 0. 0. Water-Saturated 0. 0 0. 0. Clay Content Acae 8 Caliper < 8. CROSS PLOTTING with POINTS OF REFERENCE Caliper < 7 Hormiga A Caliper < 6. HAN C = 0 HAN C = 0 HAN C = 0 HAN C = -7% HAN C = -7% HAN C = -7% Density- Density- Density-

ACAE Case Study. -- Looking at Bigger Picture 9. AC Acae Highlighted are zones with caliper < 9.. AC Acae_ Depth > 9 kft Caliper < 9. 9. Acae 7 Highlighted are zones with caliper < 9.. AC 7 AC 7 AC 7 Han -8% Clay AC 0.0 Density- 0.0 Acae_7 Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9. Density- Acae_ Depth > 9 kft Caliper < 9. Han -8% Clay 0. 0. 0 00 0 0 00 0 Acae_7 Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9.

ACAE Case Study. -- Looking at Bigger Picture 9. AC 8 Acae 8 Highlighted are zones with caliper < 9.. AC 8 AC 8 Han -8% Clay Acae_8 Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9. Acae Highlighted are zones with caliper < 9.. On the right: Dark-blue symbols are for log Vp plotted versus core porosity. 0.0 AC AC AC Han -8% Clay Acae_ Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9. 0.0 Density- Density- Han -8% Clay Acae_8 Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9. 0. Han -8% Clay 0. Acae_ Depth > 9. kft Caliper < 9. 0 00 0 0 00 0 0.

Predicting in Wells φ F = φ t + C( φ c ) ACAE Case Study.6 Dry Clay < % % < Clay < 8% All Samples No Clay VERIFYING LOG DATA BY CORE MEASUREMENTS 0. Vp Log 8% < Clay < 7% Load-Bearing Frame AC 8A AC 0.7 HR Predicted 0.0 PhiRHO ECP Core Our Core 0.0 0.0 Vp Log 0. 0.8 0. 0. 0. 0.9 0.7 Predicted.0 0 0 0. MPa 0 MPa MPa 0 MPa. 6 Predicted. 6

ACAE Case Study.7 Comment on Log Data Quality.0 0.0 0. U U Understanding rock physics helps in dealing with older data sets. 0 U.0 AC6 U. 0.70 0 7 00 0 00 0 00000 0 Resistivity..6 RHOB.0 Han -7% Clay.0 Han -7% Clay...0.0. U U U U PhiRHO. U U U U 7 PhiRHO

ACAE Case Study.8 How to Predict from Seismic -- By Integrating Core Data ACAE 8A and 0 PLUGS Poisson's Ratio 7 ACAE 8A and 0 PLUGS Log(Permeability) OIL-SATURATED ROCK 0.6 6 OIL-SATURATED PLUGS. 0.. Log(Permeability) 0 0. 0. Acoustic Impedance 0. 0-0. - 0.8 0-9 -. - 0 0.0 0.0 0.06 0.08 0. 0. 0. 0.6 0.8 0.6 8 0 0.0 0.0 0.06 0.08 0. 0. 0. 0.6 0.8 0. - 0. ACAE 8A and 0 PLUGS Log(Permeability). 0.. Poisson's Ratio 0. 0. GLAUCONITES POOR QUALITY 0. 0 The petrophysical signal for AVO lithology analysis is the lithology dependence of Vp/Vs. Inspection of Vp versus Vs trend curves for sandstones, shales, limestones, and dolomites, reveals that lithology discrimination is most robust at higher velocities where sandstones have low Vp/Vs (. -.6) and the other lithologies have higher Vp/Vs (. 7-.0). Castagna and Backus, 99-0. - 0. GOOD QUALITY -. 8 0 6 8 0 Acoustic Impedance - 8

ACAE Case Study.9 Knowing Model Helps Forward-Model Seismic Response Acae Pseudo-8A 900.6 900.6 Depth (m) 000.66.68 Depth (m) 000.66.68.7.7 depth 00 time.7.7 depth 00 time.7.7.76.76 00.78.8 00.78.8 0 00 00 0 Ip.8 0 0 distance 0 00 00 0 Ip 0 0 distance.6.66.6.66 0 Hz.68 Original.68 + % Clay.7.7.7.7 time.7 time.7.76.76.78.78.8.8.8.8 0 0 0 0 0 distance distance 9