Interaction between tidal terms and GPS orbits

Similar documents
Influence of subdaily tidal model on station coordinates and GPS orbits

Interaction between subdaily Earth rotation parameters and GPS orbits Natalia Panafidina, Urs Hugentobler, Manuela Seitz

Impact of solar radiation pressure modeling on GNSS-derived geocenter motion

Common Realization of Terrestrial and Celestial Reference Frame

Geodätische Woche The global radiational S1 tide - current Earth rotation research at TU Wien. September 17, 2015

GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions

GNSS-specific local effects at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell

Assessment of the International Terrestrial Reference System 2014 realizations by Precise Orbit Determination of SLR Satellites

3.6 ITRS Combination Centres

IGS POLAR MOTION MEASUREMENTS

Call for space geodetic solutions corrected for non-tidal atmospheric loading (NT-ATML) at the observation level

Consistent dynamic satellite reference frames and terrestrial geodetic datum parameters - status report PN 6 -

Very Long Baseline Interferometry for Geodesy and Astrometry

CODE's multi-gnss orbit and clock solution

GNSS Estimates of Short-period Nutation

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF IGS REPROCESSED ORBIT & POLAR MOTION ESTIMATES

Evaluation of the impact of atmospheric pressure loading modeling on GNSS data analysis

A priori gradients in the analysis of GPS and VLBI observations

Current status of the ITRS realization

Application of Satellite Laser Ranging for Long- Wavelength Gravity Field Determination

Very Long Baseline Interferometry for Geodesy and Astrometry

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

Assessment of the orbits from the 1st IGS reprocessing campaign

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18" Mathematical models in GPS" Mathematical models used in GPS"

ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC EXCITATION OF EARTH ROTATION

Understanding Earth Rotation Part 2: Physical Foundations and Interpretation

Introduction to geodetic VLBI

Sebastian Strasser, Torsten Mayer-Gürr

Originally published as:

Using non-tidal atmospheric loading model in space geodetic data processing: Preliminary results of the IERS analysis campaign

Earth gravity field recovery using GPS, GLONASS, and SLR satellites

Analysis effects in IGS station motion time series P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, T. van Dam, J. Ray, Z. Altamimi

3.3 Analysis Coordinator

Frequent epoch reference frames instead of instant station positions and constant velocities

Strategy for the Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)

Consistent realization of Celestial and Terrestrial Reference Frames

State-of-the-art physical models for calculating atmospheric pressure loading effects

Application of Accelerometer Data in Precise Orbit Determination of GRACE -A and -B

TIDAL EFFECTS IN GPS/GLONASS DATA PROCESSING

Nutation determination by means of GNSS

Fundamental Station Wettzell - geodetic observatory -

The global S 1 tide and Earth s nutation

The Earth s time-variable gravity field observed by GOCE

Assessment of the orbit-related sea level error budget for the TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry mission

Combined Earth orientation parameters based on homogeneous and continuous VLBI and GPS data

Challenges and Perspectives for TRF and CRF Determination

Hydrological Mass Variations due to Extreme Weather Conditions in Central Europe from Regional GRACE 4D Expansions

OBSERVING AND MODELING LONG-PERIOD TIDAL VARIATIONS IN POLAR MOTION

Report about the scientific and teaching activities within Galactic VLBI Hana Krásná

Precise Point Positioning requires consistent global products

PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION OF GPS SATELLITES FOR REAL TIME APPLICATIONS

arxiv:physics/ v1 30 Jun 2004

Correction to Atmospheric Effects and Spurious Signals in GPS Analyses

Direct measurement of diurnal polar motion by ring laser gyroscopes

Challenges and perspectives for CRF and TRF determination

IGS-related multi-gnss activities at CODE

Contribution of non-tidal oceanic mass variations to Earth rotation determined from space geodesy and ocean data

Atmospheric Effects in Space Geodesy

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

IGS Reprocessing. and First Quality Assessment

Impact of the SRP model on CODE's 5- system orbit and clock solution for the MGEX

Past, present and possible updates to the IERS Conventions. J. Ray, NGS G. Petit, BIPM

Accelerometers for GNSS Orbit Determination

ITRF2014 Et la prise en compte des mouvements non linéaires

Towards a Rigorous Combination of Space Geodetic Techniques

The Transit Timing method: How to detect extrasolar planets? Jean Coupon. (Supervisor: Norman W. Murray)

NGA GNSS Division Precise Ephemeris Parameters

GRACE processing at TU Graz

Estimation of polar motion, polar motion rates, and GNSS orbits in the IGS

Earth gravity field recovery using GPS, GLONASS, and SLR satellites

Wavelet analysis in TEC measurements obtained using dual-frequency space and satellite techniques

The GOP analysis center: a global near real-time solution

Connecting terrestrial to celestial reference frames

Gravity Monitoring with a Superconducting Gravimeter in Vienna

Torsten Mayer-Gürr Institute of Geodesy, NAWI Graz Technische Universität Graz

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part II : ITRS & ETRS89 relationship

COMBINING GPS AND VLBI MEASUREMENTS OF CELESTIAL MOTION OF THE EARTH S SPIN AXIS AND UNIVERSAL TIME. Jan VONDRÁK* and Cyril RON

Nuisance Flooding and Relative Sea-Level Rise: The Importance of Present-Day. Land Motion

On the accuracy assessment of celestial reference frame realizations

Overview of the ILRS contribution to the development of ITRF2013

CONT08 - First Results and High-Frequency Earth Rotation

Evaluation of the accuracy of the IAU 2006/2000 precession-nutation

2 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria. C Hackman 1, Guergana Guerova 2, S Byram 1, J Dousa 3 and U Hugentobler 4

Impact of A Priori Gradients on VLBI-Derived Terrestrial Reference Frames

The Ohio State University IGS LEO/GPS Pilot Project: Status and Future Plans

Improvement of the CNES/CLS IDS Analysis Center solution for the contribution to the next ITRF

Impact of A Priori Gradients on VLBI-Derived Terrestrial Reference Frames

The Kinematic Reference Frame for ITRF

Time Variable Gravity (TVG) in GRGS REPRO2 solution (GR2)

Co-location of VLBI with other techniques in space: a simulation study

Detecting and monitoring the time-variable gravity field of Greenland

A new best estimate for the conventional value W 0

ICRF-3: ROADMAP TO THE NEXT GENERATION ICRF

Calibration/validation of GOCE data by terrestrial torsion balance observations

Rotation and Interior of Terrestrial Planets

EPOS-RT: Software for Real-time GNSS Data Processing

Global Mapping Function (GMF): A new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data

GRACE. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment. JPL Level-2 Processing Standards Document. For Level-2 Product Release 05.1

Global reference systems and Earth rotation

Where do objects get their energy?

Transcription:

Interaction between tidal terms and GPS orbits Natalia Panafidina, Manuela Seitz, Urs Hugentobler Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI) Centrum für Geodätische Erdsystemforschung (CGE) München TU München EGU 2013, Vienna, Austria, 7-12 April 2013

Introduction Subdaily Earth Rotation model: IERS2010 (+ libration) Kept fixed in the processing Errors up to ~20% Empirical tidal models from GPS & VLBI: Big corrections (more than 10 µas in PM) for some tidal terms: K1(23.93h), S1 (24h), M2(12.42h), S2(12h), K2(11.97h) IERS2010+libration: K1 correction ~30 µas

Introduction Subdaily Earth Rotation model: IERS2010 (+ libration) Kept fixed in the processing Errors up to ~20% Empirical tidal models from GPS & VLBI: Big corrections (more than 10 µas in PM) for some tidal terms: K1(23.93h), S1 (24h), M2(12.42h), S2(12h), K2(11.97h) IERS2010+libration: K1 correction ~30 µas Influence of a wrong subdaily model on the orbits, coordinates, ERPs Are there draconitic signatures caused by a wrong subdaily model?

Data and solutions Data: Daily NEQs (1994-2007): station coordinates, 1h-ERPs, GPS orbits IERS2000 subdaily model used in processing What we do: Daily solutions, transformation 1h-ERPs tidal terms change apriori values for tidal terms + fix tidal terms change subdaily model Daily estimates: GPS orbits, station coordinates, geocenter (NNR+NNT), 24h ERPs

Data and solutions Influence of subdaily tidal model: change 1 tide in PM by ~100 µas Daily solutions standard subdaily model changed subdaily model Time series of differences: GPS orbits ERPs Station coordinates Spectra

Data and solutions Influence of subdaily tidal model: change 1 tide in PM by ~100 µas Daily solutions standard subdaily model changed subdaily model Time series of differences: GPS orbits ERPs Station coordinates Spectra

GPS satellites and tidal variations in Earth rotation Prograde K1 period: 23h56min in terrestrial reference frame (~1 cpd) 11h58min in inertial reference frame (~2 cpd) Orbital period of GPS satellites: 11h58min K1 CIP After half a period: CIP

GPS satellites and tidal variations in Earth rotation Prograde K1 period: 23h56min in terrestrial reference frame (~1 cpd) 11h58min in inertial reference frame (~2 cpd) Orbital period of GPS satellites: 11h58min K1 CIP After half a period: CIP K1 is seen as a constant shift

GPS satellites and tidal variations in Earth rotation Prograde K1 period: 23h56min in terrestrial reference frame (~1 cpd) 11h58min in inertial reference frame (~2 cpd) Orbital period of GPS satellites: 11h58min K1 CIP After half a period: CIP K1 is seen as a constant shift Beat periods: Close periods are seen as slow rotation

GPS satellites and tidal variations in Earth rotation Prograde K1 period: 23h56min in terrestrial reference frame (~1 cpd) 11h58min in inertial reference frame (~2 cpd) Orbital period of GPS satellites: 11h58min Diurnal tides have periods in CRF ~12 hours Beat periods: Φ1(23.80h) ~185d Ψ1(23.87h) ~380d K1(23.93h) ~shift S1(24.00h) ~352d P1(24.07h) ~179d

GPS satellites and tidal variations in Earth rotation Prograde K1 period: 23h56min in terrestrial reference frame (~1 cpd) 11h58min in inertial reference frame (~2 cpd) Orbital period of GPS satellites: 11h58min Diurnal tides have periods in CRF ~12 hours Beat periods: Φ1(23.80h) ~185d Ψ1(23.87h) ~380d K1(23.93h) ~shift S1(24.00h) ~352d P1(24.07h) ~179d Semi-diurnal tides have periods in CRF ~8 hours Beat periods: M2(12.42h) ~25.82h S2(12.00h) ~24.07h K2(11.67h) ~23.94h

Test solutions Daily solutions standard subdaily model changed subdaily model Changed tidal terms: S1(24.00h), beat period ~352d P1(24.07h), beat period ~180d O1(25.82h), beat period ~14d Spectra of time series of differences: GPS orbits: 6 Kepler elements, CODE Radiation Pressure Parameters

Influence of tidal model on the orbit: Kepler elements and radiation pressure parameters S1(24.00h), beat period ~352d S1(24.00h), beat period ~352d P1(24.07h), beat period ~180d P1(24.07h), beat period ~180d O1(25.82h), beat period ~14d O1(25.82h), beat period ~14d O1

Influence of tidal model on the orbit: noise increase Aposteriori RMS: Standard solution minus test solution changed S1 (24.00h) Standard solution minus test solution changed M2r (12.42h)

Influence of tidal model on the orbit Can we see tidal contribution in time series of real orbital parameters? Test: K1 change of 100 µas ~1.5cm change in semi-major axis, ~0.4 nm/sec**2 in RPR Realistic changes for main tides ~0.6cm change in semi-major axis, ~0.1 nm/sec**2 in RPR

Influence of tidal model on the orbit Can we see tidal contribution in time series of real orbital parameters? Test: K1 change of 100 µas ~1.5cm change in semi-major axis, ~0.4 nm/sec**2 in RPR Realistic changes for main tides ~0.6cm change in semi-major axis, ~0.1 nm/sec**2 in RPR Spectra of daily estimates of orbital parameters from standard solution

Conclusions Errors in subdaily tidal model lead to periodic signals in the GPS orbits with beat periods of the tides (+ aliasing if sampled e.g. 24h) Beat periods of ~350 days can contribute to observed signals with draconitic periods Diurnal tides are better absorbed by the orbits because their periods in CRF are close to those of GPS satellites Semi-diurnal tides increase the residuals more than diurnal tides Periodic signals in the orbits caused by wrong tides are very small, but still can be seen by spectral anslysis

Thank you!

Influence of tidal model on the station coordinates YELL, CHUR (Canada): tide S1 KOKB, MKEA (Hawaii): tide S1 HUR