The Arm Prime Factors Decomposition

Similar documents
The Arm Prime Factors Decomposition

MATH342 Practice Exam

Public Key Cryptosystems RSA

Practice Final Solutions

Practice Final Solutions

Various Proofs for the Decrease Monotonicity of the Schatten s Power Norm, Various Families of R n Norms and Some Open Problems

ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY AND DIRICHLET S THEOREM

2 Asymptotic density and Dirichlet density

2 Asymptotic density and Dirichlet density

Elementary Analysis in Q p

SOME SUMS OVER IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS

Math 4400/6400 Homework #8 solutions. 1. Let P be an odd integer (not necessarily prime). Show that modulo 2,

A CONCRETE EXAMPLE OF PRIME BEHAVIOR IN QUADRATIC FIELDS. 1. Abstract

Participation Factors. However, it does not give the influence of each state on the mode.

16.2. Infinite Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Excerpt from "Intermediate Algebra" 2014 AoPS Inc.

DIRICHLET S THEOREM ON PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS. 1. Introduction

Mersenne and Fermat Numbers

An Overview of Witt Vectors

MATH 2710: NOTES FOR ANALYSIS

MATH 250: THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIMES. ζ(s) = n s,

HENSEL S LEMMA KEITH CONRAD

Quadratic Reciprocity

I(n) = ( ) f g(n) = d n

f(r) = a d n) d + + a0 = 0

Mobius Functions, Legendre Symbols, and Discriminants

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE

MA3H1 TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY PART III

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #10 10/8/2013

RECIPROCITY LAWS JEREMY BOOHER

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY EIGHTH LECTURE

GOOD MODELS FOR CUBIC SURFACES. 1. Introduction

Pell's Equation and Fundamental Units Pell's equation was first introduced to me in the number theory class at Caltech that I never comleted. It was r

TAIL OF A MOEBIUS SUM WITH COPRIMALITY CONDITIONS

PRIME NUMBERS YANKI LEKILI

3 Properties of Dedekind domains

16.2. Infinite Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

p-adic Measures and Bernoulli Numbers

#A47 INTEGERS 15 (2015) QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS WITH INFINITELY MANY SOLUTIONS IN POSITIVE INTEGERS

MATH 3240Q Introduction to Number Theory Homework 7

A review of the foundations of perfectoid spaces

The Hasse Minkowski Theorem Lee Dicker University of Minnesota, REU Summer 2001

Math 104B: Number Theory II (Winter 2012)

Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics available online at HENSEL CODES OF SQUARE ROOTS OF P-ADIC NUMBERS

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.nt] 21 Oct 2004

#A37 INTEGERS 15 (2015) NOTE ON A RESULT OF CHUNG ON WEIL TYPE SUMS

Department of Mathematics

Cryptography. Lecture 8. Arpita Patra

Primes of the form ±a 2 ± qb 2

ON SETS OF INTEGERS WHICH CONTAIN NO THREE TERMS IN GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION

Solvability and Number of Roots of Bi-Quadratic Equations over p adic Fields

#A8 INTEGERS 12 (2012) PARTITION OF AN INTEGER INTO DISTINCT BOUNDED PARTS, IDENTITIES AND BOUNDS

On the Multiplicative Order of a n Modulo n

Math 5330 Spring Notes Prime Numbers

The Euler Phi Function

x 2 a mod m. has a solution. Theorem 13.2 (Euler s Criterion). Let p be an odd prime. The congruence x 2 1 mod p,

Numerical Linear Algebra

An Inverse Problem for Two Spectra of Complex Finite Jacobi Matrices

POINTS ON CONICS MODULO p

arxiv: v2 [math.ho] 24 Nov 2014

Outline. EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 26 Error Correction Codes, Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs) Simple Error Detection Coding

THE CHARACTER GROUP OF Q

MATH 248A. THE CHARACTER GROUP OF Q. 1. Introduction

MA3H1 Topics in Number Theory. Samir Siksek

Chapter 7 Rational and Irrational Numbers

Pythagorean triples and sums of squares

MAZUR S CONSTRUCTION OF THE KUBOTA LEPOLDT p-adic L-FUNCTION. n s = p. (1 p s ) 1.

MAS 4203 Number Theory. M. Yotov

Combinatorics of topmost discs of multi-peg Tower of Hanoi problem

Pretest (Optional) Use as an additional pacing tool to guide instruction. August 21

On the Rank of the Elliptic Curve y 2 = x(x p)(x 2)

Chapter 2 Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Series.

When do Fibonacci invertible classes modulo M form a subgroup?

Primes - Problem Sheet 5 - Solutions

SQUAREFREE VALUES OF QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS COURSE NOTES, 2015

Weil s Conjecture on Tamagawa Numbers (Lecture 1)

Some sophisticated congruences involving Fibonacci numbers

Sets of Real Numbers

Multiplicative group law on the folium of Descartes

Positive decomposition of transfer functions with multiple poles

Number Theory Naoki Sato

DISCRIMINANTS IN TOWERS

AMS10 HW1 Grading Rubric

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): 10.

March 4, :21 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE FLSpaper2011

By Evan Chen OTIS, Internal Use

Analysis of some entrance probabilities for killed birth-death processes

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY THIRD LECTURE

Factorability in the ring Z[ 5]

Arithmetic and Metric Properties of p-adic Alternating Engel Series Expansions

1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations

On the Toppling of a Sand Pile

Solutions to Problem Set 5

QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY

Analytic number theory and quadratic reciprocity

.4. Congruences. We say that a is congruent to b modulo N i.e. a b mod N i N divides a b or equivalently i a%n = b%n. So a is congruent modulo N to an

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.nt] 3 Dec 2004

CS 6260 Some number theory. Groups

Verifying Two Conjectures on Generalized Elite Primes

Relaxed p-adic Hensel lifting for algebraic systems

Transcription:

The Arm Prime Factors Decomosition Arm Boris Nima arm.boris@gmail.com Abstract We introduce the Arm rime factors decomosition which is the equivalent of the Taylor formula for decomosition of integers on the basis of rime numbers. We make the link between this decomosition and the -adic norm known in the -adic numbers theory. To see how it works, we give examles of these two formulas.

Introduction The Arm theory [1] gives the decomosition of functions on each function basis. Also, because the fundamental arithmetic theorem tells us each integers can be decomose in rime factors, I wondered if it was ossible to build the decomosition of integers on the basis of rime integers. As a matter of fact, this is ossible and the answer of this question is the Arm rime factors decomosition. To build an equivalent of the Taylor formula for the rime numbers basis, we need to find a good scalar roduct on this basis. In first lace, I remarked that if a rime number P divise an integer n N + then the difference between it and its integer art would be zero whereas that if does not divise n then the same difference would be ositive. In mathematical words it means : if n then otherwise n n [ ] n [ ] n = 0 > 0 0.1 However, we need to build a Kronecker which is one whe is why we take the exonential minus 0.1 multily by x : n δ n = ex is an integer and zero otherwise. This [ ] n x 0.2 which is one when divise n and zero otherwhise. For all that, it still remains the roblem of the multilicity m i of each rime number i because 0.2 tells us only if a rime number is in the rime factors decomosition of an integer n. Thus we have to sum all the ower of if we want to know the multilicity of each factor : δ m n = m i 0.3 With all these ingredients, we build the final Arm rime factors decomosition formula 1.5 which is nothing else that the multilication of 0.3 by the logarithm of all rime numbers. In this case the formula 0.3 gives a -adic valuation in the -adic number theory. Thus we can give an exlicit exression for the well-known -adic norm of rational numbers used in the -adic numbers theory : a = δ m b δ m a 0.4 b for each rime numbers P. 1

In the first section, we introduce the Arm rime factors decomosition formula which gives the decomosition of each integer in the rime numbers basis. After describing the scalar roduct, we give in the second section a full examle of rime factors decomosition with the number 277945762500 which is nothing else that 1 2.2 2.3 3.5 5.7 7. Next in the third section, we give the formula of the -adic norm and, in the fourth section, we calculate all -adic norm of the rational which is 21.3 2.5 2.7.11 1. 2

1 The Arm Prime Factors Decomosition Formula We give the rojection on the rime integers basis of each ositive integer n Theorem 1. n N + the Arm rime factors decomosition is given by lnn = [ ] ex m m x P where [ ] is the integer art and P is the set of all rime numbers. ln 1.5 Proof : The main idea here is that if m n i.e. m divise n then n N + and n m Q + \ N +. In other m words, we have that if m n the is an integer so it is equal to its integer arts. m Because n [ ] n m 0, we can construct the Kronecker m N m δ m n : [ ] ex m m x = 1 if m n [ ] ex m m x = 0 otherwise 1.6 If we consider the usual rime factors decomosition showed in the fundamental theorem of arithmetic : n = i m i 1.8 i=1 where m i is the multilicity of each rime factors i P. In the Arm rime factors decomosition formula, the multilicity m i of each rime factor i is obtained by summing the Kronecker : [ ] ex m m x With 1.9, we can find the Arm rime factors decomosition formula 1.5 : which is the final result. lnn = i = i = P lnn = P m i ln i n ex ex ex m i n m [ n n m m i [ n m 1.7 = m i 1.9 [ n m ] x ln i ] x ln ] x ln 1.10 3

Remark 1. We can deduce of the Arm rime factors decomosition formula 1.5 that the scalar roduct of the logarithm of each integer n N + on the basis {ln } P is given by < l, ln > = which the multilicity of each rime factor. [ ] ex m m x 1.11 Corollary 1. Each integer n N + can be decomosed in : n = [ ex n m n ]x m P 1.12 Proof : We just take the exonential of 1.5 2 Examle Of Arm Prime Factors decomosition Here we aly the Arm rime factors decomostion formula to find the rime factors of the integer : n = 277945762500 2.13 The formula 1.5 gives : lnn = ln2 e n 2 [ n 2 ]x + e n 2 2 [ n 2 2 ]x + e n 2 3 [ n 2 3 ]x +... + ln3 e n 3 [ n 3 ]x + e n 3 2 [ n 3 2 ]x + e n 3 3 [ n 3 3 ]x + e n 3 4 [ n 3 4 ]x +... + ln5 e n 5 [ n 5 ]x + e n 5 2 [ n 5 2 ]x + e n 5 3 [ n 5 3 ]x +e n 5 4 [ n 5 4 ]x + e n 5 5 [ n 5 5 ]x + e n 5 6 [ n 5 6 ]x +... + ln7 e n 7 [ n 7 ]x + e n 7 2 [ n 7 2 ]x + e n 7 3 [ n 7 3 ]x + e n 7 4 [ n 7 4 ]x +e n 7 5 [ n 7 5 ]x + e n 7 6 [ n 7 6 ]x + e n 7 7 [ n 7 7 ]x + e n 7 8 [ n 7 8 ]x +... 2.14. 2.15 4

which is with the value of n : lnn = ln2 e 138972881250[138972881250]x + e 69486440625[69486440625]x +e 34743220312.5[34743220312.5]x +... + ln3 e 92648587500[92648587500]x + e 30882862500[30882862500]x +e 10294287500[10294287500]x + e 3431429166.66[3431429166.66]x +... + ln5 e 55589152500[55589152500]x + e 11117830500[11117830500]x + e 2223566100[2223566100]x +e 444713220[444713220]x + e 88942644[88942644]x + e 17788528.8[1.77885288]x +... + ln7 e 39706537500[39706537500]x + e 5672362500[5672362500]x + e 810337500[810337500]x +e 115762500[115762500]x + e 16537500[16537500]x +e 2362500[2362500]x + e 337500[337500]x + e 48214.3[48214.3]x +.... 2.16 When we evaluate, it becomes : lnn = ln2 1 + 1 + e x2 +... + ln3 1 + 1 + 1 + e 0.666..x +... + ln5 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + e 0.8x +... + ln7 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + e 0.3x +... So we have the decomosition of lnn in rime factors :. 2.17 lnn = 2 ln2 + 3 ln3 + 5 ln5 + 7 ln7 2.18 Hence If we define the integer function n = 1 1.2 2.3 3.5 5.7 7 = Υ7 2.19 Υi = k k 2.20 k P;k i 5

3 Link with the -adic numbers The formula 1.9 of an integer n gives the multilicity of an rime factor. This multilicity is called the -adic valuation in the -adic numbers theory. We give here its exlicit exression Proosition 1. The -adic valuation of a rime factor i of an integer n is given by [ ] v n = ex m m x Proof : See 1.9. Now, with the -adic valuation, we can define the corresonding -adic norm. 3.21 Proosition 2. The -adic norm of a rational number a b Q, where a and b are corime, is given by a [ [ = ex b m b ]x m ex a m a ]x m 3.22 b or its logarithm is : a ln = b Proof : The -adic norm of an integer a : [ ] [ ] b b a a ex m m x ex m m x a = i ln 3.23 i mi 3.24 as in 1.8, where the rime factor i P and m i is the multilicity of each i, is defined as a i = m i i 3.25 However we know from 1.9 that the multilicity of each rime factor is given by i [ ] a a ex m m x = m i 3.26 Hence the -adic norm of n 3.25 is given by a i = [ ex a m a ]x m i 3.27 And so the -adic norm of a rational a b Q is given by a [ b = ex b m b ]x m i i which gives the formula 3.22. ex [ a m a ]x m 3.28 6

4 Examle of -adic norm As examle, we consider the rational : a = 4.29 b With the formula 3.22, we can first calculate the 2-adic norm [ ] [ ] ln = ex 2 2 m 2 m x ex 2 m 2 m x ln 2 [ ] [ ] = ex 2 x ex 2 2 x ln 2 2 ln = ln2 4.30 2 or in the exonential form : = 2 4.31 2 Now we calculate the 3-adic norm ln = 3 = + ln 3 or in the exonential form : Now we calculate the 5-adic norm ln = 5 = ex ex ex [ 3 m 3 m [ ] 3 x ex 3 [ ] 9 x ex 9 ] x ex [ ] 3 m 3 m x ln 3 [ ] 3 x ln 3 3 [ ] 9 x ln 3 9 = 2 ln3 4.32 + ln 5 or in the exonential form : ex ex = 1 3 9 ex [ 5 m 5 m [ ] 5 x ex 5 [ ] 25 x ex 25 ] x ex 4.33 [ ] 5 m 5 m x ln 5 [ ] 5 x ln 5 5 [ ] 25 x ln 5 25 = 2 ln5 4.34 = 25 4.35 5 7

Now we calculate the 7-adic norm ln = 7 ln 7 = or in the exonential form : ex Now we calculate the 11-adic norm ln = 11 ln 11 ex 7 [ 7 m 7 m [ ] x 7 ] x ex ex 7 [ 7 m 7 m [ ] x 7 ] x ln 7 ln 7 = ln7 4.36 = or in the exonential form : ex = 1 7 7 ex 11 [ 11 m 11 m [ ] x 11 ] x ex ex 11 4.37 [ ] 11 m 11 m x ] x ln 11 [ 11 ln 11 = ln11 4.38 = 11 4.39 11 And we have that = 1 4.40 {2, 3, 5, 7, 11}. So we have the rime factors decomosition of a b = 21.3 2.5 2 7.11 1 4.41 8

Discussion Maybe the Arm rime factors formula 1.5 is too simle but it gives a ractical way to calculate the decomosition of every logarithms of integers on the basis of the logarithm of rime numbers. However, the Arm rime factors decomosition formula 1.5 is not efficient when it is rogrammed on comuters because it does the same work as the traditional algorithm it checks if the division is an integer or not. In addition, the traditional algorithm which do the rime factorization is faster than this one. The only utility of my formula is that it gives a ractical formula in the theory. Furthermore in the formula 1.5 there is summation over ositive integers and we have to sto it until a big value if we want the algorithm to be finish. Besides there is an other summation over rime numbers and the algorithm needs to calculate all the rime numbers so it takes a lot of time for calculating. After all, I ve decided to write this article even if the algorithm is not efficient because the formulas are right and give the results. 9

Références [1] Arm B. N., The Arm Theory 10