Geometry and the Kato square root problem

Similar documents
Geometry and the Kato square root problem

Geometry and the Kato square root problem

L coefficient operators and non-smooth Riemannian metrics

The Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry

The Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry

Square roots of perturbed sub-elliptic operators on Lie groups

Square roots of operators associated with perturbed sub-laplacians on Lie groups

Rough metrics, the Kato square root problem, and the continuity of a flow tangent to the Ricci flow

Quadratic estimates and perturbations of Dirac type operators on doubling measure metric spaces

Local Hardy Spaces and Quadratic Estimates for Dirac Type Operators on Riemannian Manifolds

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Hardy spaces associated to operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates and bounded holomorphic functional calculus.

Lecture 4: Harmonic forms

CONTINUITY OF SOLUTIONS TO SPACE-VARYING POINTWISE LINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. Lashi Bandara

Orientation transport

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Hodge de Rham decomposition for an L 2 space of differfential 2-forms on path spaces

Divergence Theorems in Path Space. Denis Bell University of North Florida

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 18 May 2017

CS 468. Differential Geometry for Computer Science. Lecture 13 Tensors and Exterior Calculus

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Poisson configuration spaces, von Neumann algebras, and harmonic forms

CS 468 (Spring 2013) Discrete Differential Geometry

The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator

SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS WITH SINGULAR POTENTIALS ON MANIFOLDS OF BOUNDED GEOMETRY

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

THE HODGE DECOMPOSITION

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Minimal timelike surfaces in a certain homogeneous Lorentzian 3-manifold II

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

Survey of Taubes P SL(2, C) connections on 3-manifolds with L 2 bounds on curvature

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 31 Dec 2018

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

MATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY

Motivation towards Clifford Analysis: The classical Cauchy s Integral Theorem from a Clifford perspective

The oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains

Inequalities of Babuška-Aziz and Friedrichs-Velte for differential forms

Trotter s product formula for projections

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

The spectral zeta function

ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Lecture 5: Hodge theorem

Calderón-Zygmund inequality on noncompact Riem. manifolds

Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

Second Order Elliptic PDE

The Calabi Conjecture

THE UNIFORMISATION THEOREM OF RIEMANN SURFACES

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO SEVERAL COMPLEX VARIABLES

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras

Stochastic calculus of variations on the diffeomorphisms group

Normally hyperbolic operators & Low Regularity

RICCI SOLITONS ON COMPACT KAHLER SURFACES. Thomas Ivey

Sectorial Forms and m-sectorial Operators

The X-ray transform for a non-abelian connection in two dimensions

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III

Rigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere

Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm

L -uniqueness of Schrödinger operators on a Riemannian manifold

ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS. Zhongwei Shen

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Spectral Triples on the Sierpinski Gasket

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

THE VORTEX EQUATION ON AFFINE MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

Maxwell s equations in Carnot groups

Variational Formulations

Cohomology of Harmonic Forms on Riemannian Manifolds With Boundary

On the Convergence of a Modified Kähler-Ricci Flow. 1 Introduction. Yuan Yuan

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

A Remark on -harmonic Functions on Riemannian Manifolds

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

The Hopf argument. Yves Coudene. IRMAR, Université Rennes 1, campus beaulieu, bat Rennes cedex, France

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

Published as: J. Geom. Phys. 10 (1993)

Isometries of Riemannian and sub-riemannian structures on 3D Lie groups

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

The Cheeger-Müller theorem and generalizations

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

ON THE GEOMETRY OF CONFORMAL FOLIATIONS WITH MINIMAL LEAVES

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

The spectral action for Dirac operators with torsion

Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version

Lecture Notes on PDEs

An observation concerning uniquely ergodic vector fields on 3-manifolds. Clifford Henry Taubes

WELL-POSEDNESS OF THE LAPLACIAN ON MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY AND BOUNDED GEOMETRY

L19: Fredholm theory. where E u = u T X and J u = Formally, J-holomorphic curves are just 1

Transcription:

Geometry and the Kato square root problem Lashi Bandara Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University 7 June 2013 Geometric Analysis Seminar University of Wollongong Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 1 / 28

Outline Brief overview of the Kato square root problem on R n. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 2 / 28

Outline Brief overview of the Kato square root problem on R n. A motivating application to hyperbolic PDE. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 2 / 28

Outline Brief overview of the Kato square root problem on R n. A motivating application to hyperbolic PDE. Recent progress on the Kato square root problem on smooth manifolds by McIntosh and B. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 2 / 28

Outline Brief overview of the Kato square root problem on R n. A motivating application to hyperbolic PDE. Recent progress on the Kato square root problem on smooth manifolds by McIntosh and B. Recent progress on subelliptic Kato square root problems on Lie groups by ter Elst, McIntosh, and B. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 2 / 28

Outline Brief overview of the Kato square root problem on R n. A motivating application to hyperbolic PDE. Recent progress on the Kato square root problem on smooth manifolds by McIntosh and B. Recent progress on subelliptic Kato square root problems on Lie groups by ter Elst, McIntosh, and B. Kato square root problem on smooth manifolds with non-smooth metrics, connection to geometric flows and PDEs. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 2 / 28

The Kato square root problem Let A L (R n, L(C N )) and a L (R n ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 3 / 28

The Kato square root problem Let A L (R n, L(C N )) and a L (R n ). Suppose that there exists κ 1, κ 2 > 0 such that for all u W 1,2 (R n ), Re a(x) κ 1 and Re A u, u κ 2 u 2. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 3 / 28

The Kato square root problem Let A L (R n, L(C N )) and a L (R n ). Suppose that there exists κ 1, κ 2 > 0 such that for all u W 1,2 (R n ), Re a(x) κ 1 and Re A u, u κ 2 u 2. The Kato square root problem on R n is the statement that D( a div A ) = W 1,2 (R n ) a div A u u. (K1) Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 3 / 28

The Kato square root problem Let A L (R n, L(C N )) and a L (R n ). Suppose that there exists κ 1, κ 2 > 0 such that for all u W 1,2 (R n ), Re a(x) κ 1 and Re A u, u κ 2 u 2. The Kato square root problem on R n is the statement that D( a div A ) = W 1,2 (R n ) a div A u u. (K1) This was answered in the positive in 2002 by Pascal Auscher, Steve Hofmann, Michael Lacey, Alan McIntosh and Phillipe Tchamitchian in [AHLMcT]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 3 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). In general, this is not true by a counterexample of McIntosh in 1972 in [Mc72]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). In general, this is not true by a counterexample of McIntosh in 1972 in [Mc72]. A second related question is the following. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). In general, this is not true by a counterexample of McIntosh in 1972 in [Mc72]. A second related question is the following. Suppose that J t is a family of closed, densely-defined, Hermitian forms on H with domain W and L(t) the associated self-adjoint operators to J t with domain W. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). In general, this is not true by a counterexample of McIntosh in 1972 in [Mc72]. A second related question is the following. Suppose that J t is a family of closed, densely-defined, Hermitian forms on H with domain W and L(t) the associated self-adjoint operators to J t with domain W. If t J t extends to holomorphic family (for small z), then is t L(t) : V H a bounded operator? Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

If further A = A, (K1) is a trivial consequence of the Lax-Milgram Theorem. Solution to (K1) implies that D( div A ) = D( div A ). We can ask a more abstract question for accretive operators L on a Hilbert space H. There, the question is whether D( L ) = D( L). In general, this is not true by a counterexample of McIntosh in 1972 in [Mc72]. A second related question is the following. Suppose that J t is a family of closed, densely-defined, Hermitian forms on H with domain W and L(t) the associated self-adjoint operators to J t with domain W. If t J t extends to holomorphic family (for small z), then is t L(t) : V H a bounded operator? Counterexample to this second question by McIntosh in 1982 in [Mc82]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 4 / 28

Motivations from PDE For k = 1, 2, let L k = div A k where A k L (R n, L(C n )) non-negative self-adjoint and L k uniformly elliptic. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 5 / 28

Motivations from PDE For k = 1, 2, let L k = div A k where A k L (R n, L(C n )) non-negative self-adjoint and L k uniformly elliptic. As aforementioned, D( L k ) = W 1,2 (R n ) and L k u u for u W 1,2 (R n ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 5 / 28

Motivations from PDE For k = 1, 2, let L k = div A k where A k L (R n, L(C n )) non-negative self-adjoint and L k uniformly elliptic. As aforementioned, D( L k ) = W 1,2 (R n ) and L k u u for u W 1,2 (R n ). Let u k be solutions to the wave equation with respect to L k with the same initial data. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 5 / 28

Motivations from PDE For k = 1, 2, let L k = div A k where A k L (R n, L(C n )) non-negative self-adjoint and L k uniformly elliptic. As aforementioned, D( L k ) = W 1,2 (R n ) and L k u u for u W 1,2 (R n ). Let u k be solutions to the wave equation with respect to L k with the same initial data. That is, 2 t u k + L k u k = 0 t u k t=0 = g L 2 (R n ) u k (0) = f W 1,2 (R n ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 5 / 28

Suppose there exists a C > 0 L 1 u L 2 u C A 1 A 2 u. (P) Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 6 / 28

Suppose there exists a C > 0 L 1 u L 2 u C A 1 A 2 u. (P) Then, whenever t > 0, the following estimate holds: u 1 (t) u 2 (t) + ˆ t 0 (u 1 (s) u 2 (s)) ds Ct A 1 A 2 ( f + g ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 6 / 28

Suppose there exists a C > 0 L 1 u L 2 u C A 1 A 2 u. (P) Then, whenever t > 0, the following estimate holds: u 1 (t) u 2 (t) + ˆ t 0 (u 1 (s) u 2 (s)) ds Ct A 1 A 2 ( f + g ). See [Aus]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 6 / 28

The estimate (P) is related to the second question of Kato. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 7 / 28

The estimate (P) is related to the second question of Kato. By solving the Kato square root problem (K1) for complex coefficients A, we are able to automatically obtain (P) from (K1). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 7 / 28

Kato square root problem on manifolds Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with metric g, Levi-Civita connection, and volume measure µ. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 8 / 28

Kato square root problem on manifolds Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with metric g, Levi-Civita connection, and volume measure µ. Write div = in L 2 and let S = (I, ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 8 / 28

Kato square root problem on manifolds Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with metric g, Levi-Civita connection, and volume measure µ. Write div = in L 2 and let S = (I, ). Assume a L (M) and A = (A ij ) L (M, L(L 2 (M) L 2 (T M)). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 8 / 28

Kato square root problem on manifolds Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with metric g, Levi-Civita connection, and volume measure µ. Write div = in L 2 and let S = (I, ). Assume a L (M) and A = (A ij ) L (M, L(L 2 (M) L 2 (T M)). Consider the following second order differential operator L A : D(L A ) L 2 (M) L 2 (M) defined by L A u = as ASu = a div(a 11 u) a div(a 10 u) + aa 01 u + aa 00 u. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 8 / 28

The main theorem on manifolds Theorem (B.-Mc, 2012) Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with Ric C and inj(m) κ > 0. Suppose the following ellipticity condition holds: there exists κ 1, κ 2 > 0 such that Re av, v κ 1 v 2 Re ASu, Su κ 2 u 2 W 1,2 for v L 2 (M) and u W 1,2 (M). Then, D( L A ) = D( ) = W 1,2 (M) and L A u u + u = u W 1,2 for all u W 1,2 (M). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 9 / 28

Lipschitz estimates Since we allow the coefficients a and A to be complex, we obtain the following stability result as a consequence: Theorem (B.-Mc, 2012) Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold with Ric C and inj(m) κ > 0. Suppose that there exist κ 1, κ 2 > 0 such that Re av, v κ 1 v 2 and Re ASu, Su κ 2 u 2 W for v L 2 (M) and 1,2 u W 1,2 (M). Then for every η i < κ i, whenever ã η 1, Ã η 2, the estimate L A u L A+ Ã u ( ã + Ã ) u W 1,2 holds for all u W 1,2 (M). The implicit constant depends in particular on A, a and η i. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 10 / 28

The Hodge-Dirac operator Let Ω(M) denote the algebra of differential forms over M under the exterior product. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 11 / 28

The Hodge-Dirac operator Let Ω(M) denote the algebra of differential forms over M under the exterior product. Let d be the exterior derivative as an operator on L 2 (Ω(M)) and d its adjoint, both of which are nilpotent operators. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 11 / 28

The Hodge-Dirac operator Let Ω(M) denote the algebra of differential forms over M under the exterior product. Let d be the exterior derivative as an operator on L 2 (Ω(M)) and d its adjoint, both of which are nilpotent operators. The Hodge-Dirac operator is then the self-adjoint operator D = d +d. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 11 / 28

The Hodge-Dirac operator Let Ω(M) denote the algebra of differential forms over M under the exterior product. Let d be the exterior derivative as an operator on L 2 (Ω(M)) and d its adjoint, both of which are nilpotent operators. The Hodge-Dirac operator is then the self-adjoint operator D = d +d. The Hodge-Laplacian is then D 2 = d d + d d. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 11 / 28

The Hodge-Dirac operator Let Ω(M) denote the algebra of differential forms over M under the exterior product. Let d be the exterior derivative as an operator on L 2 (Ω(M)) and d its adjoint, both of which are nilpotent operators. The Hodge-Dirac operator is then the self-adjoint operator D = d +d. The Hodge-Laplacian is then D 2 = d d + d d. For an invertible A L (L(Ω(M))), we consider perturbing D to obtain the operator D A = d +A 1 d A. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 11 / 28

Curvature endomorphism for forms Let { θ i} be an orthonormal frame at x for Ω 1 (M) = T M. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 12 / 28

Curvature endomorphism for forms Let { θ i} be an orthonormal frame at x for Ω 1 (M) = T M. Denote the components of the curvature tensor in this frame by Rm ijkl. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 12 / 28

Curvature endomorphism for forms Let { θ i} be an orthonormal frame at x for Ω 1 (M) = T M. Denote the components of the curvature tensor in this frame by Rm ijkl. The curvature endomorphism is then the operator for ω Ω x (M). R ω = Rm ijkl θ i (θ j (θ k (θ l ω))) Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 12 / 28

Curvature endomorphism for forms Let { θ i} be an orthonormal frame at x for Ω 1 (M) = T M. Denote the components of the curvature tensor in this frame by Rm ijkl. The curvature endomorphism is then the operator for ω Ω x (M). R ω = Rm ijkl θ i (θ j (θ k (θ l ω))) This can be seen as an extension of Ricci curvature for forms, since g(r ω, η) = Ric(ω, η ) whenever ω, η Ω 1 x(m) and where : T M TM is the flat isomorphism through the metric g. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 12 / 28

Curvature endomorphism for forms Let { θ i} be an orthonormal frame at x for Ω 1 (M) = T M. Denote the components of the curvature tensor in this frame by Rm ijkl. The curvature endomorphism is then the operator for ω Ω x (M). R ω = Rm ijkl θ i (θ j (θ k (θ l ω))) This can be seen as an extension of Ricci curvature for forms, since g(r ω, η) = Ric(ω, η ) whenever ω, η Ω 1 x(m) and where : T M TM is the flat isomorphism through the metric g. The Weitzenböck formula then asserts that D 2 = tr 12 2 + R. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 12 / 28

Theorem (B., 2012) Let M be a smooth, complete Riemannian manifold and let β C \ {0}. Suppose there exist η, κ > 0 such that Ric η and inj(m) κ. Furthermore, suppose there is a ζ R satisfying g(r u, u) ζ u 2, for u Ω x (M) and A L (L(Ω(M))) and κ 1 > 0 satisfying Re Au, u κ 1 u 2. Then, D( D 2 A + β 2 ) = D(D A ) = D(d) D(d A) and D 2 A + β 2 u D A u + u. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 13 / 28

Lie groups Let G be a Lie group of dimension n with Lie algebra g and equipped with the left-invariant Haar measure µ. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 14 / 28

Lie groups Let G be a Lie group of dimension n with Lie algebra g and equipped with the left-invariant Haar measure µ. We say that a linearly independent a = {a 1,..., a k } g is an algebraic basis if we can recover a basis for g through multi-commutation. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 14 / 28

Lie groups Let G be a Lie group of dimension n with Lie algebra g and equipped with the left-invariant Haar measure µ. We say that a linearly independent a = {a 1,..., a k } g is an algebraic basis if we can recover a basis for g through multi-commutation. Let A i denote the right-translation of a i and A i = A i. Let span {A 1,..., A k } = A TG be the bundle obtained through the right-translation of a and A = { A 1,..., A k} the dual of A. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 14 / 28

Subelliptic distance Theorem of Carathéodory-Chow tells us that for any two points x, y G, we can find an absolutely continuous curve γ : [0, 1] G such that γ(t) = i γ i (t)a i (γ(t)) A. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 15 / 28

Subelliptic distance Theorem of Carathéodory-Chow tells us that for any two points x, y G, we can find an absolutely continuous curve γ : [0, 1] G such that γ(t) = i γ i (t)a i (γ(t)) A. The length of such a curve then is given by l(γ) = ˆ 1 0 ( i γ i (t) 2 ) 1 2 dt Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 15 / 28

Subelliptic distance Theorem of Carathéodory-Chow tells us that for any two points x, y G, we can find an absolutely continuous curve γ : [0, 1] G such that γ(t) = i γ i (t)a i (γ(t)) A. The length of such a curve then is given by l(γ) = ˆ 1 0 ( i γ i (t) 2 ) 1 2 dt Define distance d(x, y) as the infimum over the length of all such curves. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 15 / 28

Subelliptic distance Theorem of Carathéodory-Chow tells us that for any two points x, y G, we can find an absolutely continuous curve γ : [0, 1] G such that γ(t) = i γ i (t)a i (γ(t)) A. The length of such a curve then is given by l(γ) = ˆ 1 0 ( i γ i (t) 2 ) 1 2 dt Define distance d(x, y) as the infimum over the length of all such curves. The measure µ is Borel-regular with respect to d. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 15 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Each vector field A i is a skew-adjoint differential operator. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Each vector field A i is a skew-adjoint differential operator. We consider it as a unbounded operator on L 2 (G) with domain D(A i ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Each vector field A i is a skew-adjoint differential operator. We consider it as a unbounded operator on L 2 (G) with domain D(A i ). By also considering as a closed, densely-defined operator on L 2 (M), we obtain the first-order Sobolev space W 1,2 (G) = D( ) = k i=1 D(A i). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Each vector field A i is a skew-adjoint differential operator. We consider it as a unbounded operator on L 2 (G) with domain D(A i ). By also considering as a closed, densely-defined operator on L 2 (M), we obtain the first-order Sobolev space W 1,2 (G) = D( ) = k i=1 D(A i). We write the divergence as div =. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Subelliptic operators For f C (G), define f = A i f A i. This defines an sub-connection on C (M). Each vector field A i is a skew-adjoint differential operator. We consider it as a unbounded operator on L 2 (G) with domain D(A i ). By also considering as a closed, densely-defined operator on L 2 (M), we obtain the first-order Sobolev space W 1,2 (G) = D( ) = k i=1 D(A i). We write the divergence as div =. Then, the subelliptic Laplacian associated to A is k = div = A 2 i. i=1 Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 16 / 28

Nilpotent Lie groups The Lie group G is nilpotent if the inductively defined sequence g 1 = [g, g], g 2 = [g 1, g],... is eventually zero. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 17 / 28

Nilpotent Lie groups The Lie group G is nilpotent if the inductively defined sequence g 1 = [g, g], g 2 = [g 1, g],... is eventually zero. Theorem (B.-E.-Mc., 2012) Let (G, d, µ) be a connected, nilpotent Lie group with a an algebraic basis, d the associated sub-elliptic distance, and µ the left Haar measure. Suppose that a, A L and that there exist κ 1, κ 2 > 0 satisfying Re av, v κ 1 v 2, and Re A u, u κ 2 u 2. for every v L 2 (G) and u W 1,2 (G). Then, D( a div A ) = W 1,2 (G) and a div A u u for u W 1,2 (G). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 17 / 28

General Lie groups Let S = (I, ) as in the manifold case. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 18 / 28

General Lie groups Let S = (I, ) as in the manifold case. Theorem (B.-E.-Mc., 2012) Let (G, d, µ) be a connected Lie group, a an algebraic basis, d the associated sub-elliptic distance, and µ the left Haar measure. Let a, A L such that Re av, v κ 1 v 2, and Re ASu, Su κ 2 u W 1,2 for every v L 2 (G) and u W 1,2 (G). Then, D( as AS) = W 1,2 (G) with as ASu u W 1,2 = u + u. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 18 / 28

Operator theory We adapt the framework due to Axelsson (Rosén), Keith, McIntosh in [AKMc]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 19 / 28

Operator theory We adapt the framework due to Axelsson (Rosén), Keith, McIntosh in [AKMc]. Let H be a Hilbert space and Γ : H H a closed, densely-defined, nilpotent operator. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 19 / 28

Operator theory We adapt the framework due to Axelsson (Rosén), Keith, McIntosh in [AKMc]. Let H be a Hilbert space and Γ : H H a closed, densely-defined, nilpotent operator. Suppose that B 1, B 2 L(H ) such that here exist κ 1, κ 2 > 0 satisfying Re B 1 u, u κ 1 u 2 and Re B 2 v, v κ 2 v 2 for u R(Γ ) and v R(Γ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 19 / 28

Operator theory We adapt the framework due to Axelsson (Rosén), Keith, McIntosh in [AKMc]. Let H be a Hilbert space and Γ : H H a closed, densely-defined, nilpotent operator. Suppose that B 1, B 2 L(H ) such that here exist κ 1, κ 2 > 0 satisfying Re B 1 u, u κ 1 u 2 and Re B 2 v, v κ 2 v 2 for u R(Γ ) and v R(Γ). Furthermore, suppose the operators B 1, B 2 satisfy B 1 B 2 R(Γ) N (Γ) and B 2 B 1 R(Γ ) N (Γ ). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 19 / 28

Operator theory We adapt the framework due to Axelsson (Rosén), Keith, McIntosh in [AKMc]. Let H be a Hilbert space and Γ : H H a closed, densely-defined, nilpotent operator. Suppose that B 1, B 2 L(H ) such that here exist κ 1, κ 2 > 0 satisfying Re B 1 u, u κ 1 u 2 and Re B 2 v, v κ 2 v 2 for u R(Γ ) and v R(Γ). Furthermore, suppose the operators B 1, B 2 satisfy B 1 B 2 R(Γ) N (Γ) and B 2 B 1 R(Γ ) N (Γ ). The primary operator we consider is Π B = Γ + B 1 Γ B 2. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 19 / 28

If the quadratic estimates ˆ 0 tπ B (1 + t 2 Π 2 B) 1 u 2 u (Q) hold for every u R(Π B ), then, H decomposes into the spectral subspaces of Π B as H = N (Π B ) E + E and D( Π 2 B ) = D(Π B) = D(Γ) D(Γ B 2 ) Π 2 B u Π Bu Γu + Γ B 2 u. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 20 / 28

If the quadratic estimates ˆ 0 tπ B (1 + t 2 Π 2 B) 1 u 2 u (Q) hold for every u R(Π B ), then, H decomposes into the spectral subspaces of Π B as H = N (Π B ) E + E and D( Π 2 B ) = D(Π B) = D(Γ) D(Γ B 2 ) Π 2 B u Π Bu Γu + Γ B 2 u. The Kato problems are then obtained by letting H = L 2 (M) (L 2 (M) L 2 (T M)) and letting Γ = ( ) 0 0, Γ = S 0 ( 0 S 0 0 ), B 1 = ( ) a 0, B 0 0 2 = ( ) 0 0. 0 A Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 20 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). The idea is to reduce the quadratic estimate (Q) to a Carleson measure estimate. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). The idea is to reduce the quadratic estimate (Q) to a Carleson measure estimate. This is achieved via a local T (b) argument. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). The idea is to reduce the quadratic estimate (Q) to a Carleson measure estimate. This is achieved via a local T (b) argument. Geometry enters the picture precisely in the harmonic analysis. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). The idea is to reduce the quadratic estimate (Q) to a Carleson measure estimate. This is achieved via a local T (b) argument. Geometry enters the picture precisely in the harmonic analysis. We need to perform harmonic analysis on vector fields, not just functions. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Geometry and harmonic analysis Harmonic analytic methods are used to prove quadratic estimates (Q). The idea is to reduce the quadratic estimate (Q) to a Carleson measure estimate. This is achieved via a local T (b) argument. Geometry enters the picture precisely in the harmonic analysis. We need to perform harmonic analysis on vector fields, not just functions. One can show that this is not artificial - the Kato problem on functions immediately provides a solution to the dual problem on vector fields. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 21 / 28

Elements of the proofs Similar in structure to the proof of [AKMc] which is inspired from the proof in [AHLMcT]. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 22 / 28

Elements of the proofs Similar in structure to the proof of [AKMc] which is inspired from the proof in [AHLMcT]. A dyadic decomposition of the space Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 22 / 28

Elements of the proofs Similar in structure to the proof of [AKMc] which is inspired from the proof in [AHLMcT]. A dyadic decomposition of the space A notion of averaging (in an integral sense) Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 22 / 28

Elements of the proofs Similar in structure to the proof of [AKMc] which is inspired from the proof in [AHLMcT]. A dyadic decomposition of the space A notion of averaging (in an integral sense) Poincaré inequality - on both functions and vector fields Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 22 / 28

Elements of the proofs Similar in structure to the proof of [AKMc] which is inspired from the proof in [AHLMcT]. A dyadic decomposition of the space A notion of averaging (in an integral sense) Poincaré inequality - on both functions and vector fields Control of 2 in terms of. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 22 / 28

The case of non-smooth metrics on manifolds We let M be a smooth, complete manifold as before but now let g be a C 0 metric. Let µ g denote the volume measure with respect to g. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 23 / 28

The case of non-smooth metrics on manifolds We let M be a smooth, complete manifold as before but now let g be a C 0 metric. Let µ g denote the volume measure with respect to g. Let h C 0 (T (2,0) M). Then, define h op,g = sup x M sup h x (u, v). u g = v g =1 If g is another C 0 metric satisfying g g op,g δ < 1, then L 2 (M, g) = L 2 (M, g) and W 1,2 (M, g) = W 1,2 (M, g) with comparable norms. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 23 / 28

Π B under a change of metric The operator Γ g does not change under the change of metric. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 24 / 28

Π B under a change of metric The operator Γ g does not change under the change of metric. However, Γ g = C 1 Γ gc where C is the bounded, invertible, multiplication operator on L 2 (M) L 2 (M) L 2 (T M). Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 24 / 28

Π B under a change of metric The operator Γ g does not change under the change of metric. However, Γ g = C 1 Γ gc where C is the bounded, invertible, multiplication operator on L 2 (M) L 2 (M) L 2 (T M). Thus, Π B,g = Γ g + B 1 Γ gb 2 = Γ g + B 1 C 1 Γ gcb 2. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 24 / 28

Π B under a change of metric The operator Γ g does not change under the change of metric. However, Γ g = C 1 Γ gc where C is the bounded, invertible, multiplication operator on L 2 (M) L 2 (M) L 2 (T M). Thus, Π B,g = Γ g + B 1 Γ gb 2 = Γ g + B 1 C 1 Γ gcb 2. This allows us to reduce the study of Π B,g for a C 0 metric g to the study of Π B, g = Γ g + B 1 Γ g B 2 where B 1 = B 1 C 1 and B 2 = CB 2, but now with a smooth metric g. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 24 / 28

Connection to geometric flows Given a C 0 metric g on a smooth compact manifold, we are able to always find C metric g. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 25 / 28

Connection to geometric flows Given a C 0 metric g on a smooth compact manifold, we are able to always find C metric g. The metric g has inj(m, g) > κ and Ric( g) g η so we obtain a corresponding Kato square root estimate in this setting. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 25 / 28

Connection to geometric flows Given a C 0 metric g on a smooth compact manifold, we are able to always find C metric g. The metric g has inj(m, g) > κ and Ric( g) g η so we obtain a corresponding Kato square root estimate in this setting. The non-compact situation poses issues. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 25 / 28

Connection to geometric flows Given a C 0 metric g on a smooth compact manifold, we are able to always find C metric g. The metric g has inj(m, g) > κ and Ric( g) g η so we obtain a corresponding Kato square root estimate in this setting. The non-compact situation poses issues. Smooth the metric via mean curvature flow for, say, a C 2 imbedding? Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 25 / 28

Connection to geometric flows Given a C 0 metric g on a smooth compact manifold, we are able to always find C metric g. The metric g has inj(m, g) > κ and Ric( g) g η so we obtain a corresponding Kato square root estimate in this setting. The non-compact situation poses issues. Smooth the metric via mean curvature flow for, say, a C 2 imbedding? Smooth the metric via Ricci flow in the general case? Regularity of the initial metric? Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 25 / 28

Application to PDE In the case we are able to find a suitable C metric near the C 0 one, then we have Lipschitz estimates. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 26 / 28

Application to PDE In the case we are able to find a suitable C metric near the C 0 one, then we have Lipschitz estimates. Possible application to hyperbolic PDE? Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 26 / 28

Application to PDE In the case we are able to find a suitable C metric near the C 0 one, then we have Lipschitz estimates. Possible application to hyperbolic PDE? Stability of geometries with Ricci bounds and injectivity radius bounds? Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 26 / 28

References I [AHLMcT] Pascal Auscher, Steve Hofmann, Michael Lacey, Alan McIntosh, and Ph. Tchamitchian, The solution of the Kato square root problem for second order elliptic operators on R n, Ann. of Math. (2) 156 (2002), no. 2, 633 654. [AKMc-2] Andreas Axelsson, Stephen Keith, and Alan McIntosh, The Kato square root problem for mixed boundary value problems, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 74 (2006), no. 1, 113 130. [AKMc], Quadratic estimates and functional calculi of perturbed Dirac operators, Invent. Math. 163 (2006), no. 3, 455 497. [Aus] Pascal Auscher, Lectures on the Kato square root problem, Surveys in analysis and operator theory (Canberra, 2001), Proc. Centre Math. Appl. Austral. Nat. Univ., vol. 40, Austral. Nat. Univ., Canberra, 2002, pp. 1 18. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 27 / 28

References II [Christ] Michael Christ, A T (b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the Cauchy integral, Colloq. Math. 60/61 (1990), no. 2, 601 628. [Mc72] Alan McIntosh, On the comparability of A 1/2 and A 1/2, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1972), 430 434. [Mc82], On representing closed accretive sesquilinear forms as (A 1/2 u, A 1/2 v), Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications. Collège de France Seminar, Vol. III (Paris, 1980/1981), Res. Notes in Math., vol. 70, Pitman, Boston, Mass., 1982, pp. 252 267. [Morris] Andrew J. Morris, The Kato square root problem on submanifolds, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 86 (2012), no. 3, 879 910. Lashi Bandara (ANU) Geometry and the Kato problem 7 June 2013 28 / 28